CR-IDENT CR-IDENT: A MATLAB Toolbox for Multivariable Control-Relevant System Identification Hyunjin Lee 1 and Daniel E. Rivera2 Control Systems Engineering Laboratory Department of Chemical Engineering Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-6006 January, 2008 Copyright © Control Systems Engineering Laboratory, ASU. 1 Currently with the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Insti- tute, Troy, NY. Email: hlee6@rpi.edu or peacemaple@hotmail.com 2 To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Phone: (480) 965-9476, Fax: (480) 965-0037, E-mail: daniel.rivera@asu.edu Contents 1 CR-IDENT Overview 4 2 Installing CR-IDENT and System Requirements 6 3 Getting Started with the CR-IDENT Toolbox 7 4 Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI 8 4.1 Background in Multisine Input Signal Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.2 Generating Multi-Channel Input Signals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2.1 Input Signal Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2.2 General Signal Specs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4.2.3 Parameter Selection for Signal Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.2.4 Plots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.2.5 Action Buttons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.3 Data Structure from Input Signal Design GUI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.4 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5 Running Experiment from Input Design GUI 18 6 Frequency Response Estimation GUI 19 6.1 Background in Frequency Response Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6.2 Entry Data Format for Frequency Response Estimation GUI . . . . . . . . 19 6.3 Start Estimating Frequency Reponses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.4 7 6.3.1 Loading DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.3.2 Freqeuncy Response Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6.3.3 Plots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 6.3.4 Additive Uncertainty Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 6.3.5 Action Buttons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI 26 7.1 Entry Data Format for Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI . . . . . 27 7.2 Getting Started with Control-Relevant Curvefitting . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 7.3 8 9 7.2.1 Loading DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 7.2.2 Specification for Matrix Fraction Description . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 7.2.3 Parameter Estimation by Unweighted Curvefitting . . . . . . . . . 29 7.2.4 Parameter Estimation by Weighted Curvefitting . . . . . . . . . . . 30 7.2.5 MPC Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 7.2.6 Action Buttons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Robust Loopshaping GUI 33 8.1 Entry Data Format for Robust Loopshaping GUI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 8.2 Getting Started with Robust Loopshaping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 8.2.1 Loading DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 8.2.2 Process Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 8.2.3 Uncertainty Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 8.2.4 Performance Weights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 8.2.5 Transfer Function Plots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 8.2.6 Action Buttons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 8.2.7 Sensitivity Function Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Illustrative Examples of CR-IDENT 39 9.1 Illustration with Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator Problem . . . . . . . . . . . 40 9.2 Illustration with Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column . . . . . . . . . . 42 9.3 Example Study of Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column . . . . . . . . . 45 10 Remarks and Conclusions 49 11 Acknowledgements 49 1 CR-IDENT Overview This document describes CR-IDENT, a Matlab-based toolbox that implements a comprehensive framework for multivariable control-relevant system identification aimed primarily at process system applications. CR-IDENT consists of a series of graphic user interface (GUI) modules that accomplish (1) multivariable input signal design for multisine and pseudo-random binary sequences (PRBS), (2) frequency response estimation, (3) control-relevant frequency response curvefitting, and (4) robust loopshaping. The toolbox is intended to generate efficient models whose end use is the design of high-performance model-based control systems (Rivera et al., 2003; Lee, 2006). An important component in the implementation of this design procedure is its reliance on a priori knowledge of the system of interest to design input signals meeting both theoretical and practical user requirements. Data from identification testing using these signals are the basis for the subsequent steps of frequency-response estimation, and control-relevant parameter estimation. A resultant representation is a discrete-time state-space model that can be used as the nominal model for Model Predictive Control or other forms of multivariable control design. Improving the link between system identification and control design has been a subject of great interest in the control systems literature for nearly two decades (Hjalmarsson, 2005). There is a continuing need for control-relevant identification methodologies focused on multivariable problems that appeal to both academic and industrial practitioners. In principle, such methodologies should be comprehensive in nature, take full advantage of a priori knowledge of a system to be identified, be as short and non-invasive as possible to the process (i.e., “plant-friendly”), and not make substantial demands on user-skill levels in its implementation (Rivera et al., 2003). Based on recent research activities in the Control Systems Engineering Laboratory at Arizona State University, CR-IDENT has been developed with these goals in mind (Rivera et al., 2003; Lee, 2006). The functionality implemented in the CR-IDENT is summarized in Figure 1. Although aimed primarily at process system applications, the methodology is broadly-applicable and can be useful in multiple application domains. These modules can be used independently or as part of an integrated procedure, as shown in Figure 1. The functionality of each module is accessed with a graphical user interface (GUI) to provide flexibility and convenience to the user. The theoretical background behind CR-IDENT is described in various papers by Lee et al. (2003a; 2003b), Lee and Rivera (2004; 2005a; 2005b), Rivera et al. (2007) and the Ph.D. dissertation by Lee (2006). 4 Figure 1: Summary of the design procedure and functionality available in CR-IDENT, a comprehensive framework for multivariable control-relevant system identification. This document presents the general features of the CR-IDENT and helps the users get started and acquire the experience of using this toolbox. In the following, we will introduce the four main GUIs in the CR-IDENT with step-by-step guidelines for the user. Moreover, two illustrative example cases are provided based on the Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator Problem (Prett and Garcı́a, 1988) and Jacobsen-Skogestad high-purity distillation columns (Jacobsen and Skogestad, 1994). These examples can be accessed directly from the GUI. A variety of multisine input signal designs supported by the toolbox is demonstrated and the data arising from these designs are used to obtain models which are evaluated through the closed-loop Model Predictive Control application. This document is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the installation of the CR-IDENT release and Section 3 shows how to get started with the CR-IDENT. Section 4 explains the Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI and Section 5 introduces examples of Matlab Simulink for the open-loop experiment simulation. Sections 6 and 7 present the Frequency Response Estimation GUI and Control-Relevant Curvefitting GUI, respectively. Section 8 presents the Robust Loopshaping GUI that involves uncertainty estimation, performance weight specification, and µ-analysis. The illustrative example cases are given with step-by-step procedures and discussed in Section 9. Section 9.3 presents an illustrative example that follows the identification test monitoring procedure taking advantage of interactive and iterative usage for control-relevant modeling, targeted on Model Predictive Control application. Finally, Section 10 presents remarks and conclusions. 5 2 Installing CR-IDENT and System Requirements The directory structure for the CR-IDENT toolbox is shown in Figure 2 Figure 2: Directory structure for CR-IDENT Toolbox The toolbox is designed using Matlab R14 with Service Pack 3 (Version 7.1) and requires the Signal Processing, Control System, System Identification, and Model Predictive Control Toolboxes as well as Simulink. Installation of the CR-IDENT Toolbox is accomplished by the following steps: 1. Copy “CRIDENT Toolbox releasexx.zip” at a directory. 2. Uncompress “CRIDENT Toolbox releasexx.zip” from the current directory. If it is properly uncompressed, the main directory contains the same sub-directories as Figure 2. 3. Start Matlab on your computer and open “Set Path” window from “File” menu on the Matlab command window. 4. Click “Add with Subfolders” and select “CRIDENT Toolbox releasexx” directory. Then, it will automatically include the sub-directories. 5. Hit the “Save” button and close the “Set Path” window. 6 Although the CR-IDENT toolbox should work in all Matlab plaforms, its development has been primarily done using PC-Windows. 3 Getting Started with the CR-IDENT Toolbox Now, CR-IDENT is ready to be started by the user. Invoking the command >> crident calls a main menu (see Figure 3) with options corresponding to each of the four GUIs that comprise CR-IDENT. The toolbox consists of modules for multi-channel input signal design (multisine and PRBS), frequency-response estimation, control-relevant frequencyresponse curvefitting, and robust loopshaping. Figure 3: The main GUI for CR-IDENT, a toolbox for multivariable control-relevant identification. To open each individual GUI, the user needs to hit the buttons on the CR-IDENT GUI, which will then open the corresponding GUI window. Currently, it is not possible to run multiple instances of the same GUI. Salient aspects for each GUI module are described in the ensuing sections. 7 4 4.1 Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI Background in Multisine Input Signal Design By enabling direct specification of the power spectrum, multisine signals represent a versatile class of inputs for accomplishing system identification (see Figure 5). A multisine input u j (k) for the j-th channel of a multivariable system with m inputs is defined as mδ u j (k) = ∑ δ̂ ji cos(ωikT + φ δji ) + i=1 m(δ +ns ) p ∑ 2α ji cos(ωi kT + φ ji ) i=mδ +1 m(δ +ns +na ) + ∑ â ji cos(ωi kT + φ aji ), j = 1, · · · , m (1) i=m(δ +ns )+1 where m is the number of channels, δ , ns , na are the number of sinusoids per channel (m(δ + ns + na ) = Ns /2), φ δji , φ ji , φ aji are the phase angles, and δ̂ ji , α ji , & â ji represents the Fourier coefficients defined by the user. δ̂ ji , â ji are the “snow effect” Fourier coefficients, and ωi = 2πi/Ns T is the frequency grid. The “snow effect” (Guillaume et al., 1991) refers to sinusoids where both Fourier coefficients and phases are selected by the optimizer, which can serve as an aid for achieving plant-friendliness (Lee et al., 2003b). The snow effect is not implemented in the current version of CR-IDENT; instead the user can specify l f and h f which are Fourier coefficients in the low and high frequency grids. Figure 4 shows a general zippered input power spectrum for a three-channel MIMO case as implemented in CR-IDENT. For orthogonal input signals, the power spectrum of channels should not be excited at the same frequencies; only a single input channel is excited at a specific frequency, while the other channels are suppressed. To achieve a zippered spectrum, we define the Fourier coefficients α ji for u j (k) as ( 6= 0, i = mδ + j, m(δ + 1) + j, ..., m(δ + ns − 1) + j α ji = = 0, for all other i up to m(δ + ns ) (2) A frequency range of interest containing the bandwidth of the primary power spectrum should fall within the range specified by the inequality of (3) (Braun et al., 2002; Rivera et al., 2002). α 1 = ω∗ ≤ ω ≤ ω ∗ = L H β τdom τdom (3) Within the primary bandwidth, sinusoidal harmonics perturb the dynamics of a system of 8 Figure 4: Conceptual design of a standard “zippered” spectrum for a three-channel signal. interest to produce informative datasets for system identification. Consequently, 2πm(1 + δ ) 2πm(ns + δ ) π ≤ ω∗ ≤ ω ≤ ω ∗ ≤ ≤ Ns T Ns T T (4) which in turn translates into the following inequalities for the number of sinusoids, the sampling time, and the sequence length (ns , T, and Ns , respectively) ns + δ ≥ (1 + δ ) ω∗ ω∗ ns − 1 π π T ≤ min , ω ∗ ω ∗ − ω∗ ns + δ 2πm(1 + δ ) 2πm(ns + δ ) max 2m(ns + δ ), ≤ Ns ≤ ω∗ T ω ∗T (5) (6) (7) The principal design guideline implemented in the CR-IDENT uses a priori knowledge of dominant time constants of the system and speed of the response specifications to define a primary bandwidth for excitation in the signal (Lee et al., 2003b; Lee and Rivera, 2005b). For users not wishing to use these guidelines, the input GUI supports direct parameter specification with a verification routine to insure proper implementation. The input design GUI (Figure 5) offers various options for multi-channel implementation such as phase-shifted, orthogonal (“zippered”) spectrum, and modified zippered spectrum designs (Lee and Rivera, 2004). The phase-shifted multisine input design adopts a technique well-known in the literature for pseudo-random signals in which multiple channels 9 Figure 5: Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI in CR-IDENT. are shifted relative to each other in order to reduce the interactions between channels. A similar feature is available for PRBS signals. A zippered power spectrum design gives orthogonality to individual input channels so that only one input channel is excited at each frequency grid. The result of this approach is longer signal lengths relative to shifted signals, but with lower levels of cross-correlation. For the case of strongly interactive systems, CR-IDENT offers the multisine signal with a modified zippered spectrum that contains both correlated and uncorrelated harmonics over the frequency bandwidth. A modified zippered spectrum enables a directional adjustment that can be used to emphasize specific gain directions, i.e., the low-gain direction. This is a critical consideration in the identification of highly-interactive systems (Lee et al., 2003b; Lee and Rivera, 2005b; Rivera et al., 2007). If users provide a gain matrix, the GUI computes the system gain directions and adjusts the signal’s input directions and power amplitudes to produce a more balanced distribution in the output state-space (Lee and Rivera, 2005b). For all multisine signal choices shown in Figure 5, the phases can be obtained through either the closed-form formula by Schroeder (1970) or the iterative p-norm optimization 10 approach that minimizes crest factor developed by Guillaume et al. (1991). Signals can be validated in both time and frequency domains and be exported in “struct” format. A modified Shell Heavy Oil Fractionator (Prett and Garcı́a, 1988) and Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column (Jacobsen and Skogestad, 1994) problems are provided as examples with the CR-IDENT. When the user selects the example buttons on the GUI, these bring up default parameters that represent sensible choices of design variables for each of the two example systems. 4.2 Generating Multi-Channel Input Signals The detailed procedure of how to generate input signals using the Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI is given here. 4.2.1 Input Signal Type Figure 6: Input signal type selection on the Input Design GUI First, the user determines an input signal type between “Multisine” or “PRBS.” The GUI will disable some components depending on the user selection. Multisine Inputs: “Phases” should be either Guillaume-Phasing (Guillaume et al., 1991) or Schroeder-Phasing (Schroeder, 1970). The crest factor minimization algorithm using Guillaume-Phasing takes more time to compute than Schroeder-Phasing. 11 “Multisine Type” should be given among Shifted, Zippered, or Modified Zippered design that specifies an input power spectrum for multiple input channels. If the number of input channels is one, they are all identical. “Low Frequency Interval (δ )” creates the given number of channel groups in the input power spectrum at low frequency grids using “Low Frequency Ratio (lf)” (≤ 1). The coefficients in the lower frequency grids in Figure 4 that correspond to l f . “High Frequency Ratio (hf)” (≤ 1) defines Fourier coefficients at higher frequencies outside the primary bandwidth. The coefficients in the higher frequency grid in Figure 4 have value h f . “Harmonic Suppression (hs)” suppresses sinusoidal harmonics at the frequency grids of the multiples of prime number (2,3,5,...) in the input power spectrum. “Correlated Harmonics Design” is for a modified zippered spectrum that requires two additional design factors. • “gamma (γ)” applies its ratio to the correlated harmonics. • “direction” specifies a particular input directional vector (in real or complex values) of interest to the correlated harmonics. This can be given directly by the user or can be computed from a steady-state gain by hitting on the Gain Matrix button. Then, the following window will show up. Figure 7: Entering a gain matrix for design a modified zippered spectrum The user can directly enter a gain matrix or a variable name that exists in the Matlab workspace. A general scheme of the modified zippered spectrum is illustrated in Figure 8. 12 Figure 8: Conceptual design of a modified zippered power spectrum for 2-channel signal PRBS Inputs: PRBS inputs rely on the phase-shifting method for multiple input implementation. “Inverse Repeat Sequence” results in an even frequency grid harmonic suppression effect. 4.2.2 General Signal Specs Although the user can determine general signal specs, more often these parameters should be based on the system’s physical characteristics. Figure 9: General input signal specs on the Input Design GUI “Sampling Time” is the minimum hold time of change for the input sequence, which should 13 agree with the measurement sampling time in the output. “Number of Channels” corresponds to the number of input channels in a given system. The user can select a value between 1 and 20 on the current GUI, or numerically specify a number larger than 20. “Number of Cycles” repeats one period of the input signal for the specified number of cycles. “Amplitude” is the input magnitude that can be given in several ways for multiple channels. For example when the user has two input channels, the amplitude can be given either in string or number format, • 1 ≡ [1 • [1 4.2.3 1] ≡ 1 ∗ ones(2, 1) 0.5] Parameter Selection for Signal Bandwidth Figure 10: Design parameter selection on the Input Design GUI Design Guideline: a priori process information is utilized for this option, which specifies the primary excitation bandwidth as described before from (3) to (7) L “T domL” and “T domH” indicate the low and high dominant time constants, i.e., τdom H . and τdom 14 “Al pha” and “Beta” represent αs and βs for the speed of closed-loop response and settling time requirement, respectively. “No. of Sinusoids” is an optional parameter allows the user to specify the number of sinusoids in the primary excitation bandwidth. Direct Specification for Shifted Signals: The options are changed based on Multisine and PRBS, respectively, such that 1. Multisine • “Number of Sinusoids” directly specifies the number of sinusoids for the primary bandwidth. • “Sequence Length” directly specifies the sequence length for multisine input signals. 2. PRBS • “Switching intervals (nsw)” indicates that the input magnitude will remain unchanged for at least this time interval. • “No. of shift registers” specifies for the number of registers for the pseudorandom binary sequence generator. Frequency Bandwidth Specification: This is a simple specification relative to the previous selections. It allows the user to specify a primary bandwidth (ω∗ - ω ∗ ) for both multisine and PRBS inputs (see Equation (3)). “Lower w” indicates ω∗ for the lower bound of a primary bandwidth. “Upper w” indicates ω ∗ for the upper bound of a primary bandwidth. “No. of Sinusoids” is only available with the Multisine signal option, which generates that amount of sinusoids within the specified bandwidth. 4.2.4 Plots The GUI provides several plots for the input signal. 15 • “Time Series” plots one cycle of the generated input signals. • “Input Power Spectrum” draws the input power spectrum based on one cycle. • “Auto/Cross Correlation” takes the correlation analysis for input signals. The user can specify the lag size. Figure 11: Plotting options on the Input Design GUI 4.2.5 Action Buttons Figure 12: Action buttons on the Input Design GUI The GUI provides a series of the action buttons for signal generation and data management. “Analyze/Plot” generates input signals with selected user’s choices and plot options. A small bar window shows up for the progress status. “SAVE” opens a window to save the current signal data to a file. 16 “LOAD” opens a window to load a signal data file to the current GUI. “CLEAR ALL” clears all the data information on the GUI. “Close Figures” closes all the open Matlab figures. “toWorkspace” transfers the input signal data to the Matlab workspace with a variable name on the text box given by the user. 4.3 Data Structure from Input Signal Design GUI The data structure from the Input Signal Design GUI has a number of components that are needed for the internal operation of the GUI. The essential components for executing an identification testing experiment, as well as being useful for subsequent portions of CRIDENT, are as follows Components Description u Inputs Ts Sampling time Ns One cycle sequence length ns Number of sinusoids in the primary bandwidth Table 1: Essential components of the data in “struct” format from Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI 4.4 Examples The input design GUI provides two example cases based on the Shell Heavy Oil Fractionator (Prett and Garcı́a, 1988) and the Jacobsen-Skogestad (Jacobsen and Skogestad, 1994) high-purity distillation column problems. Preset values are loaded on the GUI when buttons for these examples are selected; the user can then analyze these examples within the GUI as desired. 17 Figure 13: Illustrative examples on the Input Signal Design GUI 5 Running Experiment from Input Design GUI The user can use the designed input data in variety of ways for simulation or experiment for identification testing. To use the input signal on the Matlab workspace, it can be available directly from the GUI using “toWorkspace” or using a command “load filename” on the Matlab command window. With a designed input signal, u, Ns , and Ts are used as essential information for running the testing experiment. The user has to decide a number of cycles for the total test duration. Ns should not be modified and will be the basis for calculating the test cycles. The simulation or experiment styles may depend on the user. However, the input and output data should be collected properly for the further identification analysis. Figures 14 and 15 show typical examples of the simulation set using Matlab Simulink. Figure 14: A Matlab Simulink simulation for Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column 18 Figure 15: A Matlab Simulink simulation for a modified Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator Problem 6 6.1 Frequency Response Estimation GUI Background in Frequency Response Estimation The Frequency-Response Estimation GUI (Figure 16) enables estimating frequency responses from multisine-generated data using both parametric and non-parametric approaches. The Empirical Transfer Function Estimate (ETFE) and Spectral Analysis (SA) methods are used for non-parametric estimation, while high-order ARX models are utilized for parametric frequency-response estimation. For noisy ETFE responses, a Model-on-Demand curve smoothing algorithm by Stenman et al. (2000) is available. The specific requirements created by zippered frequency grids are considered for orthogonal ETFE computation; this also includes the treatment of signals that involve harmonic suppression. Since multisine signals with the modified zippered spectrum contain correlated harmonics, ETFEs cannot be computed; however, SA and ARX estimation options are available, instead. 6.2 Entry Data Format for Frequency Response Estimation GUI Having completed experimental testing, the generated dataset can be used for further analysis in CR-IDENT. The first cycle of the data is usually not used for the identification analysis in order to reduce the impact of transient effects. 19 Figure 16: Frequency-Response Estimation GUI. The GUI takes “iddata” or “struct” format as input data whose essential components include the following: input and output time series, sampling time, the sequence length for one cycle, and the number of sinusoids (only for “struct”; see Table 2). Once the input data is loaded, the GUI analyzes an input signal type and blocks the choices that are not available with the given input type. Users can export the estimated responses in “idfrd” or “struct” format. These are used in the ensuing modules in support of advanced control system design, e.g., control-relevant parameter estimation and robust loopshaping, among other uses. 20 Components Description y Outputs u Inputs Ts Sampling Time Ns One cycle sequency length ns Number of sinusoids (in “struct”) Table 2: Components of the experimental data, entry structure for Frequency Response Estimation GUI 6.3 Start Estimating Frequency Reponses 6.3.1 Loading DATA An experimental dataset is loaded using the block in Figure 17. The user can load the data from the Matlab workspace or a *.mat file of either “struct” or “iddata” object. From the workspace, the user enters a data name on the edit block and hit the “LOAD DATA” button. If the entered data is not available on the workspace, an error message will appear. From a *.mat file, the user hits the “LOAD DATA” button with the empty edit box. Then, it prompts the file open window for selecting a data file. Figure 17: Load an input/output dataset to Frequency Response Estimation GUI Once the experiment dataset is loaded, the GUI determines the input signal type based on 21 its input power spectrum. The user has no control over the “Input Signal Type”. “Quick Start” runs a series of frequency response estimations with basic options available on the GUI. 6.3.2 Freqeuncy Response Methods The user decides a method of frequency response estimation with the loaded input/output data using the selection options in Figure 18. Figure 18: Methods of frequency response estimation option ETFE Analysis computes non-parametric Empirical Transfer Function Estimates. “Modelon-Demand Curve Smoothing” is available for smoothing noisy frequency responses. The ETFE of the h`-th element of G is obtained from a fraction of output and input DFT sequences (Ljung and Glad, 1994) such that gh` (ωi ) = 1 r s r ∑s=1 Yh (ωi ) U` (ωi ) (8) Yhs (ωi ) and U` (ωi ) represent the DFT sequences of ysh (k) and u` (k) at frequency ωi , respectively, and ysh (k) = yh (k + (s − 1)Ns ) (9) for k = 1, ..., Ns and s = 1, ..., r. Spectral Analysis uses the “spa” command of the Matlab. Alternatively, a frequency response estimator can be obtained as follows gh` (ωi ) = Su` yh (ωi ) Su` u` (ωi ) 22 (10) where Su` yh (ωi ) and Su` u` (ωi ) represent power spectra of corresponding signal sequence. “Lag Window” is determined from the number of sinusoids (ns ) and the sequence length (Ns ). “Conf. Level” (confidence level) is optional for the standard deviation analysis with the frequency response. With a selected confidence level, the GUI generates shaded areas associated with the frequency responses. The user can consult the “spa” command in Matlab for details. High-Order ARX Analysis utilizes a parametric ARX (auto-regressive exogenous) estimation. From a high-order ARX model, frequency responses are approximated as G(ωi ) ≈ (1 + A1 z1 + ... + Ana zna )−1 (B0 + B1 z1 ... + Bnb znb ) znk (11) where z = e− jωi T for a discrete-time model. The user can run either single-input multipleoutput (SIMO) or multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) ARX analysis depending on the order in “[na, nb, nk]”. “na” determines the number of discrete output terms in the ARX model. For a 2×2 system, “na” can be given “10” or “10 10” for SIMO and MIMO, respectively. “nb” indicates the number of discrete input terms in ARX structure, which should be given with respect to each input. “nk” represents the order of discrete input delay in ARX structure, which should be given with respect to each input. “Order Selection” is an option available for SIMO-ARX analysis. The user should specify ranges of the orders, e.g., [[1:10] [1:10] [1:1]] for “na”, “nb”, and “nk”, respectively. It also requires a validation dataset with the same data dimension (data length can be different) as the loaded estimation dataset. To load a validation dataset, it is the same for loading the estimation dataset by hitting “LOAD” button. “Residual Analysis” is available with the ARX model and residual data. “Conf. Level” (confidence level) generates the standard deviation analysis with the pa23 rameter values in the ARX model. 6.3.3 Plots With the selected options, the user can start analyzing the input/output data into frequency responses interactively on the GUI (Figure 19). Figure 19: Analysis and Plot for frequency response estimation “Response Amplitudes” generates the frequency response amplitudes for individual transfer functions. “Response Phases” generates the frequency response phases for individual transfer functions. “Time Sequences” draws the input and output time sequence over the total length. “Input Power Spectrum” provides an input power spectrum. “Output Power Spectrum” provides an output power spectrum using the last cycle from the estimation data. 6.3.4 Additive Uncertainty Estimation Additive uncertainty estimation is included in the GUI. One can assume that each element pi j in the plant P is independent, but confined to a disk with radius `i j at p̃i j in the Nyquist 24 plane (Morari and Zafiriou, 1988) |pi j − p̃i j | ≤ `i j (12) Therefore, a set of models are defined as they reside within the distance `. For more information for the additive uncertainty description, the user can refer to Lee (2006). Figure 20: Additive uncertainty estimation on the Frequency Response Estimation GUI 6.3.5 Action Buttons The user can manipulate the estimated frequency responses for further analysis using the action buttons, as shown in Figure 21. The estimation data can be in either “IDFRD” or “struct” format for further analysis in the CR-IDENT. Figure 21: Action buttons on the Frequency Response Estimation GUI “SAVE” stores the estimation data into a *.mat file. “LOAD” opens a *.mat data file and uploads it on the GUI. “Export to IDFRD” transforms the frequency response data into an IDFRD object to the Matlab workspace. The IDFRD object can be used for the control-relevant curvefitting; however, currently it cannot contain the uncertainty description and other information from the GUI. “toWorkspace” puts the current data information into the Matlab workspace (in “struct” format) with a given variable name. 25 “CLEAR” empties all the information and data on the GUI. “Close Figures” closes all the Matlab figures. 6.4 Examples By the use of the Input Signal Design GUI, two examples of open-loop testing experiment are performed in Matlab Simulink. Their Simulink MDL files are available in the “example” directory. The input/output dataset are uploaded for frequency response estimation by hitting the buttons in Figure 22 Figure 22: Example cases on the Frequency Estimation GUI A Modified Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator provides the two cases using phase-shifted and standard zippered multisine input designs. In addition the model is slightly modified from the Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator with longer time delays in transfer functions. Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column provides the three cases using phase-shifted, standard zippered, and modified zippered multisine input designs. In particular, the modified zippered spectrum is considered for the directional adjustment to enhance the low gain directionality in the outputs, meaningful for such a highly interactive systems. 7 Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI The goal of the control-relevant frequency-response curvefitting GUI (Figure 23) is to optimally estimate a useful parametric model with satisfactory control-relevance which can be used as a nominal for Model Predictive Control (MPC). The approach used here follows according to the analysis described in Lee and Rivera (2005a; 2005b). Users can rely on frequency responses from the previous GUI, or import frequency responses in “idfrd” or “struct” format with the proper syntax. The controlrelevant curvefitting algorithm approximates frequency-responses into parsimonious discretetime state-space model representations based on linear Matrix Fractional Descriptions (MFD). 26 Figure 23: Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI. The curvefitting relies on frequency-dependent pre- and post- weight functions meaningful to MPC control (Rivera and Gaikwad, 1995). The control-relevant weighting functions systematically shift the model error into regions that are less significant to closed-loop control performance. Sanathanan-Koerner iteration and Gauss-Newton minimization are applied to successively improve the model estimate; robustness criteria such as the Small Gain Theorem can be specified from the GUI to monitor the control-relevancy of an MFD model. If a closed-loop Simulink model is available, users can test the estimated model with respect to setpoint tracking directly from the GUI. 7.1 Entry Data Format for Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI The necessary components for the entry data structure to the control-relevant curvefitting GUI are given as follows Components Description Gw Frequency response, in complex valued-form w Frequency grids Ts Sampling time [in minute] Table 3: Essential components for Control-Relevant Frequency Response Curvefitting GUI 27 The components in Table 3 can be contained either “IDFRD”or “struct” format. 7.2 7.2.1 Getting Started with Control-Relevant Curvefitting Loading DATA An estimated data is loaded using the block in Figure 24. The user can load the data from the Matlab workspace or a *.mat file. From the workspace the user enters a data structure name on the edit block and hit the “LOAD DATA” button. If the entered data is not available on the workspace, an error message will appear. From a *.mat file the user just hits the “LOAD DATA” button with the empty edit box. Then, it prompts the file open window for selecting a data file. Figure 24: Loading the dataset to the Control-Relevant Curvefitting GUI Once the dataset is loaded without errors, its information is analyzed and printed in “System Information” box, e.g., the number of inputs and outputs and frequency bandwidth range. 7.2.2 Specification for Matrix Fraction Description Model Orders: The MFD model consists of a matrix polynomial fraction. A model P̃ is approximated into a linear parametric, real rational transfer function, formed by a left-side fractional matrix polynomial description. Left MFD P̃(ξ −1 , θ ) = A(ξ −1 , θ )−1 B(ξ −1 , θ ) (13) where A and B denote parameterized polynomial matrices in the indeterminate ξ −1 . ξ (ωi ) = jωi represents a continuous time model, whereas ξ (ωi ) = e jωi T represents the shift opera28 tor. It requires the model orders for the number of matrix polynomial in the B (“nb”) and A (“na”), respectively. In addition, the time delay (“nk”) can be specified. Iteration Options & Error Criteria: “SK-Loop Iteration” gives the minimum and maximum iteration numbers for the Sanathanan and Koerner (1963) method that updates the weighting functions utilizing the previous model parameter. “G.N. Iteration at a SK step” specifies the number of Gauss-Newton error minimization iteration at each SK-step. Extended from the original SK-method, an optimal model parameter set is considered simultaneously with the SK-iteration. “Abs. Error” sets the absolute weighted error criterion for the SK and GN loop termination. “Rel. Error” sets the relative weighted error criterion for the SK and GN loop termination. “Relative Parameter Difference” sets the relative parameter difference criterion with the previous and current model parameters for the SK and GN loop termination. The curvefitting loop terminates only when all three user error specifications are met. If the loop is not numerically converging properly, the curvefitter will terminate abruptly. Curvefitting noisy frequency responses requires a more relaxed set of error criteria to keep it from abrupt termination. Over-parameterization could result in crashes in the loop iteration. On the other hand, the user can try setting some relaxed error criteria while monitoring model performance with the Small Gain Theorem analysis and closed-loop MPC evaluation. 7.2.3 Parameter Estimation by Unweighted Curvefitting Model estimation error is minimized iteratively without using weighting functions. Currently, the input change weighting is not implemented in the routine. This will considered for the future release version. 29 Figure 25: Specification options for MFD model on the curvefitting GUI Figure 26: Unweighted curvefitting into MFD model 7.2.4 Parameter Estimation by Weighted Curvefitting The control-relevant weighting is considered for curvefitting the frequency response into a parametric MFD model. In particular, this requires more information than the unweighted curvefitting. The weighted curvefitting needs an initial parameter model to obtain the pre/post weighting functions. Since the closed-loop response is reflected on the weighting functions, the user should provide an appropriate tuning set for MPC. Select Initial Weighting: The current release version is only based on the initial model “from Unweighted MFD Model” for initial weights. The future release will consider “from Loopshaping bounds” and “from User Defined Weights.” Model Predictive Control Tuning for Weighting: MPC (Model Predictive Control) takes a set of tuning parameters: PH (prediction horizon), MH (moving horizon), Ywt (output weighting), and Uwt (move suppression). The detailed information can referred to the Matlab MPC Toolbox manual. Moreover, the weighting function also needs the “Input Changes” which is located in the “MPC Evaluation” panel. “Tuning Adjustment” is a feature that draws the sensitivity and complementary sensitivity 30 functions using a parametric model and the given MPC tuning set for the user convenience. “True Plant” is an option for the user to provide the true plant to the curvefitting GUI, in the state-space model or a Matlab transfer function object. If provided, true plant is used for the spectral radius analysis and the comparison with frequency responses and parametric models. Figure 27: Control-relevant weighted curvefitting into MFD model 7.2.5 MPC Evaluation Taking advantage of the estimated parametric model, a closed-loop evaluation with the MPC tuning parameters used for the weighting function that can be performed. It requires a Matlab Simulink Model (*.MDL) file in “MPC Simulink Model”, and the user is required to assign a name for an MPC object in “MPC Object.” In addition, the user should specify “End Time” in the same unit with the sampling time. “Input Change” is considered for generating the weighting function and a reference change 31 Figure 28: Preparation for MPC closed-loop evaluation in the closed-loop evaluation with MPC. For example, it can be given for a two-output system as r = [1 7.2.6 − 1] Action Buttons Figure 29: Action buttons on the Curvefitting GUI “Close Figures” closes all the Matlab figures. “SAVE” stores all the information from the GUI into a file. “LOAD” opens a file and uploads it onto the GUI. “CLEAR ALL” empties all the information on the GUI. “toWorkspace” exports all the information to the Matlab workspace. 32 7.3 Examples By the use of the Input Signal Design and Frequency Estimation GUIs, two example cases for the curvefitting procedure available directly from the GUI. The frequency responses can be uploaded by hitting the buttons in Figure 30 Figure 30: Illustrative example cases on the curvefitting GUI A Modified Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator provides the two cases using phase-shifted and standard zippered multisine input designs. In addition, the model is slightly modified from the Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator with longer time delays in transfer functions. Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column provides the three cases using phase-shifted, standard zippered, and modified zippered multisine input designs. In particular, the modified zippered spectrum is considered for the directional adjustment to enhance the low gain direction in the distillation column. The frequency responses are estimated based on the ETFE for a standard zippered spectrum signal and Spectral Analysis for phase-shifted and modified zippered spectrum signals. 8 Robust Loopshaping GUI The goal of the Robust Loopshaping GUI is to design a set of models that can meet the requirements of robust stability and performance. Figure 31 shows the necessary components for this robust loopshaping procedure. The robustness bounds for the sensitivity and complementary sensitivity functions involve performance weight(s) and uncertainty bound. Those conditions of robust stability and performance are computed using Structured Singular Value analysis. For successful robust control system design, it is necessary to iterate between controlrelevant parameter estimation and robust loopshaping; this follows a procedure we call identification test monitoring (Rivera et al., 2003). Initially, frequency responses with uncertainty bounds are considered to compute robust loop bounds that are used as a preliminary guideline for controller tuning in the control-relevant curvefitting. The evaluation of 33 Figure 31: Robust Loopshaping GUI. a parametric model is performed using robust loopshaping considering both uncertainty bounds and model estimation error. If the model satisfies the loop bounds, the procedure can be terminated; otherwise, the user needs to change performance weights and otherwise iterate on the control-relevant parameter estimation and robust loopshaping procedures. 8.1 Entry Data Format for Robust Loopshaping GUI The Robust Loopshaping GUI supports data formats from the Frequency Response Estimation GUI and the Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI. Specifically, the Robust Loopshaping GUI needs input and output data, frequency responses, or a parametric model to evaluate robustness conditions. In addition, the data structure from the Robust Loopshaping GUI can work with the Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI supporting iterative procedure during identification test monitoring. 34 8.2 8.2.1 Getting Started with Robust Loopshaping Loading DATA A dataset from Frequency Response Estimation GUI and Control-Relevant Parameter Estimation GUI is loaded using the block in Figure 32. The user can load the data from the Matlab workspace or a *.mat file. From the workspace the user enters a data structure name on the edit box and hit the “LOAD DATA” button. If the entered data is not available on the workspace, an error message will appear. From a *.mat file the user just hits the “LOAD DATA” button with the empty edit box. Then, it prompts the file open window for selecting a data file. Figure 32: Loading the dataset to the Robust Loopshaping GUI Once the dataset is loaded without errors, data information is analyzed and printed in the box, e.g., the number of inputs and outputs, the number of sinusoids, the sequence length, and the sampling time. If available, it indicates the signal-to-noise ratio in dB. 8.2.2 Process Source The Robust Loopshaping GUI computes robust loop bounds based on frequency responses or a parametric models. The user can select a process source in Figure 33. If a parametric MFD model is selected, the loopshaping procedure will consider model estimation error in addition to uncertainty bounds. 35 Figure 33: Process Source for the Robust Loopshaping GUI 8.2.3 Uncertainty Estimation Uncertainty estimation relies on the same procedure implemented in the Frequency Response Estimation GUI. The user may change the confidence level during the iterative procedure of designing a robust control system. Figure 34: Uncertainty Estimation on the Robust Loopshaping GUI 8.2.4 Performance Weights The two performance weights are considered for the robust control system: (1) Wp performance weight (Figure 35) on the sensitivity function S̃ such that kWp S̃k < 1 Wp = s/Ms + ωb s + ωb ε (14) (15) where Ms is the peak sensitivity, ωb is the bandwidth, and ε is given as |S̃(0)| ≤ ε, and (2) Wu on P̃−1 H̃ = CS̃ (Figure 36) is given as kWu P̃−1 H̃k < 1 (16) s + ωbc /Mu ε1 s + ωbc (17) Wu = where Mu is the maximum gain of CS̃, ωbc is the controller bandwidth, and ε1 ≥ |CS̃| at high frequencies. The parameters for Wp and Wu can be specified on Figure 37. 36 Figure 35: Performance weight Wp on S̃ Figure 36: Performance weight Wu on CS̃ 8.2.5 Transfer Function Plots Robust loopshaping involves a number of transfer functions and the user can plot them on the GUI. Select check boxes of transfer functions and hit “Refresh Plot” button on Figure 38, it will update the figure window, as shown in Figure 39. 8.2.6 Action Buttons “Close Figures” closes all the Matlab figures. “Robust Stability” analyzes robust stability on a set of models, i.e., µ(M11 ). “Mu Analysis Test” performs µ-analysis test on a set of models, i.e., µ(M). 37 Figure 37: Performance weight specification on the Robust Loopshaping GUI Figure 38: Plotting options on the Robust Loopshaping GUI “LOOP SHAPING” computes robust loop bounds taking advantage of µ-analysis, i.e., σ̄ (S̃) and σ̄ (H̃). “SAVE” stores all the information from the GUI into a file. “LOAD” opens a file and uploads it onto the GUI. “CLEAR” empties all the information on the GUI. “toWorkspace” exports all the information to the Matlab workspace. 8.2.7 Sensitivity Function Specification With computed robust loop bounds, the user can optionally specify a nominal model that can meet robustness conditions. The specified nominal model and computed loop bounds are used a guideline for controller tuning in control-relevant curvefitting. 38 Figure 39: Plotting window on the Robust Loopshaping GUI Figure 40: Action buttons on the Robust Loopshaping GUI 9 Illustrative Examples of CR-IDENT CR-IDENT includes two built-in illustrative example cases to help the user with appropriate parameter specification on the GUIs. In this section, we demonstrate step-by-step procedures for using CR-IDENT on two example cases: a modified version of the Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator Problem (Prett and Garcı́a, 1988) and Jacobsen-Skogestad distillation column (Jacobsen and Skogestad, 1994). The results and discussion for the JacobsenSkogestad distillation column are presented later in this section. 39 Figure 41: Nominal model specification on the Robust Loopshaping GUI 9.1 Illustration with Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator Problem 1. Open the Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI 2. Hit “Heavy-Oil Fractionator” button, and it brings the preset parameters on the GUI. The user may change some design options or multisine signal type. 3. Choose “Time Series”, “Power Spectral Density”, and “Auto/Cross Correlation”. 4. Hit “Analyze/Plot” button. 5. Put “test01” on the edit box above the “toWorkspace” button. 6. Hit “toWorkspace” button. 7. Go to the Matlab command window. Run “run shell idtest” and follow the instructions from the program such that Enter Multisine Input Data Structure (e.g., contains ###.u): test01 Please make input signals as us[i,:], i=channel index Please enter a number of cycles for running [nc=3]: 21 Please enter a name for saving Input/Output data to a structure: idtest01 idtest01 = u: y: Ts: Ns: ns: ncycles: [7000x2 double] [7000x2 double] 4 350 10 21 with “vard=1.0” for the noise option on the popup menu selection. Lowering the value of vard will require less input signal cycles for successful estimation. The user may change noise realization inside the script program of “run shell idtest.m” 8. Open the Frequency Response Estimation GUI 40 9. Put “idtest01” on the data load box and Hit “LOAD DATA” button. 10. Select “Spectral Analysis” since the input signal is designed by the phase-shifting method. Put “256” in the “Lag Window” box. 11. Select “Response Amplitudes” and Hit “ESTIMATE” button (the user can choose different options). 12. Put “fresptest01” on the edit box in the “toWorkspace” box and Hit the button. 13. Open the Control-Relevant Curvefitting GUI 14. Before loading “fresptest01” on the GUI, please Hit “Heavy-Oil Fractionator” and Choose “Phase-Shifted Case” because by doing this the user can take advantage of preset curvefitting options for “A Modified Shell Heavy-Oil Fractionator” case on the GUI. Then proceed to load “fresptest01’.’ 15. Hit “MFD ESTIMATE” button for the unweighted curvefitting. If it is successful, the user can run the closed-loop evaluation with MPC by hitting the “MPC Test” button with “MFD Model” selected. The user may change the parameters in “Matrix Fraction Description Method” to improve the numerical convergence for the loop iteration. Model orders are [na=1, nb=1, nk=1], and Iteration Options & Error Criteria are “SK-Loop Iteration: Max=30, Min=2”, “GN Iteration at a SK step=50”, “Abs. Error=1e-12”, “Rel. Error=0.0001”, “Relative Parameter Difference=1e-10.” 16. Hit “CRMFD ESTIMATE” button for the weighted curvefitting. If it is successful, the user can run the closed-loop evaluation with MPC by hitting the “MPC Test” button with “CRPEP Model” selected. The user may change the parameters in “Matrix Fraction Description Method” to improve the numerical convergence for the loop iteration. To use the true model during the curvefitting, hit “Load Model” with putting “shell ss” in the edit box and select “True Plant(optional).” For MPC-relevant weights, “PH=35”, “MH=10”, “Ywt=[1 1]”, and “Uwt=[15 22]*1.605.” MPC Evaluation is set as “MPC Object=mpc3”, “MPC Simulink Model=Shell HOFP MPC”, “Input Change: r=[0.1 -0.1]”, and “End Time=1500.” 17. The use may iterate the last two steps until the estimated model shows desirable performance in the closed-loop evaluation. Otherwise, the user may need to refine the frequency responses or to redo the input signal design and testing experiment. 41 9.2 Illustration with Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column Utilizing the step-wise procedures given in the previous section, a modified zippered spectrum input design is utilized for the Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column. The openloop Matlab Simulink simulation is provided at “run jacobsen skogestad idtest” in the “Example” directory. 1. Open the Multivariable Input Signal Design GUI 2. Hit “Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column” button, and it brings the preset parameters on the GUI. The user may change some design options or multisine signal type. 3. Choose “Time Series”, “Power Spectral Density”, and “Auto/Cross Correlation”. 4. Hit “Analyze/Plot” button. 5. Put “test02” on the edit box above the “toWorkspace” button. 6. Hit “toWorkspace” button. 7. Go to the Matlab command window. Run “run jacobsen skogestad idtest” and follow the instructions from the program such that Enter Multisine Input Data Structure (e.g., contains ###.u): test02 Defining the Full-Order High-Purity Column... MULTIVARIABLE IDENTIFICATION OF THE HIGH-PURITY DISTILLATION COLUMN The 82-state high-purity column is described as: y(t) = [P_LV(s)] u(t) + [P_F(s)] d(t) where y(t) = |dyD| | | ; |dxB| |dL | u(t) = | | ; |dV | d(t)=dF Enter the variance of noise added to Output 1(0=no noise) [4.7e-005]: Enter the variance of noise added to Output 2(0=no noise) [8.7e-005]: Please make input signals as us[i,:], i=channel index Please enter a number of cycles for running [nc=3]:6 Please enter a name for saving Input/Output data to a structure: idtest02 42 idtest02 = u: y: Ts: Ns: ns: ncycles: [4580x2 double] [4580x2 double] 8 916 78 6 Inside the script program “run jacobsen skogestad idtest.m”, the user may change noise realization. 8. Open the Frequency Response Estimation GUI 9. Put “idtest02” on the data load box and Hit “LOAD DATA” button. 10. Select “Spectral Analysis” since the input signal is designed by a modified zippered power spectrum design. Put “256” or “512” in the “Window Lag” box. 11. Select “Response Amplitudes” and Hit “ESTIMATE” button (the user can choose different options). 12. Put “fresptest02” on the edit box in the “toWorkspace” box and Hit the button. 13. Open the Robust Loopshaping GUI 14. Put “fresptest02” on the data load box and Hit “LOAD DATA” button. 15. Choose “Frequency Responses” on the “Process Source”. 16. Select a “Confidence Level” for the Uncertainty Estimation and then press the “Estimate” button. 17. Select a “Performance Weight” and put appropriate parameters. Once such case is “Wp ” with mb = 4, wb = 0.001, and A = 10−6 . 18. Hit the “LOOP SHAPING” and it computes the robustness bounds with respect to the nonparametric frequency responses. 19. Write “rsloop02” in the edit box and Hit the “toWorkspace”. 20. Open the Control-Relevant Curvefitting GUI 21. Before loading “rsloop02” on the GUI, please Hit “Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column” and Choose “Modified Zippered Case” because by doing this the user can take advantage of preset curvefitting options for “Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column” case on the GUI. 43 22. Hit “MFD ESTIMATE” button for the unweighted curvefitting. If it is successful, the user can run the closed-loop evaluation with MPC by hitting the “MPC Test” button with “MFD Model” selected. The user may change the parameters in “Matrix Fraction Description Method” to improve the numerical convergence for the loop iteration. Model orders are [na=1, nb=1, nk=1], and Iteration Options & Error Criteria are “SK-Loop Iteration: Max=20, Min=2”, “GN Iteration at a SK step=100”, “Abs. Error=1e-12”, “Rel. Error=0.001”, “Relatvie Parameter Difference=0.001.” 23. Hit “CRMFD ESTIMATE” button for the weighted curvefitting. If it is successful, the user can run the closed-loop evaluation with MPC by hitting the “MPC Test” button with “CRPEP Model” selected. The user may change the parameters in “Matrix Fraction Description Method” to improve the numerical convergence for the loop iteration. To use the true model during the curvefitting, hit “Load Model” with putting “jacob ss” in the edit box and select “True Plant(optional).” For MPCrelevant weights, “PH=35”, “MH=5”, “Ywt=[1 1]”, and “Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.13.” MPC Evaluation is set as “MPC Object=mpc3”, “MPC Simulink Model=Jacobsen Skogestad MPC”, “Input Change: r=[0.1 -0.1]”, and “End Time=500.” 24. The user may iterate the last two steps until the estimated model satisfies the robustness conditions and shows desirable nominal performance in the closed-loop evaluation. 25. Once the weighted model is obtained, repeat the procedure with the Robust Loopshaping GUI and compute the robustness conditions based on the parametric model. For a weighting fuction in the loopshaping, “Wp ” is used with mb = 4, wb = 0.001, and A = 10−6 , and “Confidence Level” is 95%. 26. When new robustness condition bounds are computed, repeat the procedure in the Control-Relevant Curvefitting GUI. Find a controller tuning parameter set that can satisfy robustness conditions. If a weighted model satisfies robust conditions in both Control-Relevant Curvefitting and Robust Loopshaping GUIs, the user can stop. 27. At last, the obtained set of models based on the weighted model and uncertainty bounds may possess sufficient model adequacy for robust control system. 44 9.3 Example Study of Jacobsen-Skogestad Distillation Column The Jacobsen-Skogestad column represents a highly interactive system, and as a result a directional input signal design is considered to achieve balanced gain directionality in the data. From a priori model information, a steady-state gain is obtained such that " # 0.785 −0.771 K= 0.966 −0.978 (18) and SVD analysis on K gives " U= −0.6249 −0.7807 −0.7807 0.6249 # " Σ= 1.7609 0 0 0.0130 # " VH = −0.7072 −0.7070 # 0.7070 −0.7072 (19) A γ range is obtained using the above information as γmin = 54.25 ≤ γ ≤ γmax = 84.65 (20) As a result, γavg = 69.45 and v2 = [−0.7070 −0.7072] are selected for designing a modified zippered power spectrum, as shown in Figure 42a. The input magnitude is set to u = [±14 ±14]. The high magnitude helps in reducing the uncertainty norm bound by applying a higher signal-to-noise ratio, as indicated by the following equation n Φv `¯a ∝ N Φu (21) where n is the number of model parameters and N is the data length. The nature of the distillation process requires information at the lower frequencies for accurate gain directionality of steady-state, while the closed-loop dynamics requires information at the higher frequenH = 67, cies. Considering such characteristics, we can decide on design parameters τdom L = 15, α = 2, and β = 3 that lead to a much shorter bandwidth, i.e., a sequence length τdom Ns = 316. The higher correlated harmonics increase the corresponding output span in the [1 -1] direction (see Figure 43), which ultimately enhances the low gain directionality. Spectral analysis is applied to compute nonparametric frequency responses (P̃) using a Hamming window with 128 lags. An uncertainty description bound is estimated to define a set of models, as shown in Figure 45. As a consequence, robust loopshaping can be applied. In this experiment, robust stability is satisfied over all frequencies, as shown in Figure 46. Robust stability and performance conditions from robust loopshaping can be used 45 to assess control adequacy of the models estimated from the data, and hence can influence the decision to start or stop experimental testing. The experiment is tested for 14 cycles to reduce the norm bound of model uncertainty to a suitable level for robust loopshaping analysis. Initially, robust loopshaping on P̃ is performed, providing provides σ̄ (H̃) and σ̄ (S̃) as a preliminary tuning guideline to properly tune the MPC controller in control-relevant curvefitting that are selected to satisfy σ̄ (H̃) and σ̄ (S̃) bounds (Figure 44a). Relying on previously weighted models, we can iteratively tune the weighted curvefitting algorithm until a weighted model meets the loopshaping bounds. When a weighted model satisfies the loopshaping bounds, its Small Gain condition shows sufficient levels of nominal stability, as seen in Figure 44b. The weighted model (P̂) is then taken into account again for robust loopshaping including the model error P̃ − P̂. The model estimation error and model uncertainty are incorporated into N Ĥ and N Ŝ structures for loopshaping. As the bounds of σ̄ (Ĥ) and σ̄ (Ŝ) are satisfied with the weighted model P̂, a finalized model can be obtained that meets both control relevance and robustness requirements with an MPC tuning set of PH=35, MH=5, Ywt=[1 1], and Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.13 (Figure 47). A closed-loop model evaluation of a satisfactory curvefit model using setpoint tracking is shown in Figure 48. With a faster set of MPC tuning parameters, only the weighted model shows fast and over-damped responses without offset; the unweighted model suffers numerical oscillations in y2 and overshoot in y1 . A synergistic effect of using the directional input signal design and weighted curvefitting clearly results in the accurate estimate of the low singular values (Figure 49). In spite of the large number of testing cycles, the unweighted curvefitted model does not show a reasonable estimate of the low singular values. This is clear evidence that the weighted curvefitting is effectively able to efficiently capture the low gain directional information which is designed to be emphasized by the use of a modified zippered spectrum. The performance weight and tuning parameters can provide flexibility to adjust the robust loop bounds during the iterative procedure between the curvefitting and loopshaping. The success of control-relevant and robust models can be guaranteed when a sufficient number of testing cycles are tested so that the uncertainty norm bound is reduced to a suitable level. A control-relevant model satisfying robustness conditions is obtained after 14 cycles, at which time experimental testing is halted. At each cycle interval, the identification test monitoring framework evaluates updated robust loopshaping bounds and whether these are applicable for weighted curvefitting; if so, we can halt identification testing. Figures 51 to 52 show the intermediate identification test monitoring analysis at 5 and 10 cycles, respectively. Their Small Gain conditions 46 Input PSD Time Sequences : Noise in Y [9.41972 14.9255]dB 0.4 0.2 4 Y1 10 0 −0.2 −0.4 2 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Noisy 2500 Noise free 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0.4 0 10 0 −0.4 u Φ (ω) Y2 0.2 −0.2 10 −2 U2 10 0 −10 −4 10 U2 10 0 −10 −6 10 −2 −1 10 10 Frequency [rad/min] Time [min] (a) Input PSD (b) Time Sequences Figure 42: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column: a standard zippered power spectrum design (a) and time series of input and output data (b) Input State−Space Output State−Space 0.4 15 0.3 10 0.2 0.1 Y2 U2 5 0 0 −0.1 −5 −0.2 −10 −0.3 −15 −0.4 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 −0.4 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 U1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Y 1 (a) Input State-Space (b) Output State-Space Figure 43: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column: input (a) and output (b) state-space plots 47 G22 0 10 −1 −1 10 10 −2 10 −2 −3 −2 10 −1 10 10 10 0 10 G22 1 −3 10 −2 10 1 10 10 0 −1 0 True10 Plant 10 G(ω) Unweighted MFD G22 Weighted CR−MFD 0 10 10 −1 −1 10 10 −2 10 G22 0 10 −2 −3 −2 10 10 −1 10 10 0 10 −3 10 −2 −1 10 10 0 10 (a) Frequency Responses and Curvefits Spectral Radius Analysis[ρ(Em H)] 0 10 unweighted MFD weighted MFD σmax(Wy S) σmax([r−d]) −1 10 −2 −1 10 10 (b) Small Gain Condition ρ(Em Ĥ) Figure 44: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column:: frequency responses and curvefitting (a) with MPC tuning set: PH=35, MH=5, Ywt=[1 1], and Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.13 (a) and Small Gain condition for the unweighted and weighted curvefit models (b) 48 are all under the unity (around 10−1 ) over the bandwidth (Figures 51a to 52a), which is much lower than those of unweighted models. With the increasing number of cycles, the levels of uncertainty bound are lower and have very similar values at 10 and 14 cycles (see Figure 50). The robust loopshaping bounds are changed dynamically along testing cycles. σ̄ (H) is always lower than the unity in this case; therefore, σ̄ (S) is only considered for applicable robustness bound in the identification test monitoring procedure. σ̄ (S) after 5 cycles is only available for the high frequencies (Figure 51b). After 10 cycles, σ̄ (S) is computed for a wider range but is partly missing in the low frequencies (Figures 52b). All the low singular value plots show good estimation to the true plant (Figures 51d to 52d). Robust stability analysis is improved with increasing test cycles from 5 to 10 cycles (see Figures 53 and 54). 10 Remarks and Conclusions CR-IDENT represents a software implementation of a comprehensive control-relevant identification methodology that is motivated by the needs and requirements of process systems, particularly strongly interactive ones such as high purity distillation. The toolbox reduces the background and skill level required to implement this procedure, since only a priori knowledge of a system in terms of time constants and steady-state gains (if available) is required to initiate this toolbox. Following identification testing, the frequency-response estimation and control-relevant curvefitting modules work interactively (with necessary iterations between the GUIs) to produce a useful model leading to a high performance Model Predictive Controller. This was demonstrated for a strongly interactive distillation column simulation. As a result, CR-IDENT is able to provide an integrated framework that is highly demanded to achieve a systematic identification test monitoring procedure. The most updated CR-IDENT toolbox and its documents can be accessed from the ASU-CSEL website using the link: http://www.fulton.asu.edu/˜csel/Software.html. 11 Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by grant number PRF-37610-AC9 from the American Chemical Society-Petroleum Research Fund, and general support from the Honeywell Foundation to the Control Systems Engineering Laboratory. 49 Additive Uncertainty Norm Bounds −2 ||∆ || Stage 3 ||∆a || 10 a −3 10 −4 10 −2 −1 10 10 Frequency [rad/min] Figure 45: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column: additive model uncertainty norm bound with 35 cycles Robust Stability 0 10 −1 µ 10 −2 10 −3 10 −2 10 Frequency [rad/min] −1 10 Figure 46: Experiment (at 14 cycles) of identification test monitoring for the JacobsenSkogestad high purity distillation column: robust stability analysis 50 Robust Loopshaping with Weighted CR−MFD G(ω) 0 Amplitude 10 −1 10 −2 10 Sω Hω δ(S(ω)) δ(H(ω)) Wp (ω) −3 10 −2 −1 10 10 Frequency Figure 47: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column: robust loopshaping bounds on P̂ with MPC tuning set: PH=35, MH=5, Ywt=[1 1], and Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.13 y2 y1 MPC Setpoint Tracking Test 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Setpoint 150 200 Weighted MFD Unweighted MFD 0 50 100 0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 Time [min] 150 200 0 −0.05 −0.1 −0.15 u1 40 20 0 u2 20 10 0 Figure 48: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column: setpoint (r=[0.1 -0.1]) tracking test with MPC, MPC tuning set: PH=35, MH=5, Ywt=[1 1], and Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.13 51 Singular Value Plot 0 σmax 10 −1 10 True Plant Unweighted MFD −1 10 Weighted MFD −2 10 −2 σmin 10 −3 10 −2 10 Frequencies [Rad/Min] −1 10 Figure 49: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column: singular values of true plant vs. estimated models in frequency domain, MPC tuning set: PH=35, MH=5, Ywt=[1 1], and Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.13 Additive Uncertainty Norm Bounds −2 10 ||∆a || −3 10 ||∆a|| Stage 3 (14 cycles) −4 10 ||∆a|| Stage 3 (10 cycles) ||∆a|| Stage 3 (5 cycles) −2 −1 10 10 Frequency [rad/min] Figure 50: Experiment of identification test monitoring for the Jacobsen-Skogestad high purity distillation column: additive uncertainty norm bounds at 5, 10, and 14 cycles 52 Spectral Radius Analysis[ρ(Em H)] Robust Loopshaping with Weighted CR−MFD G(ω) 0 10 0 Amplitude 10 −1 10 −1 10 Sω −2 10 unweighted MFD weighted MFD σmax(Wy S) σmax([r−d]) −2 Hω δ(S(ω)) δ(H(ω)) Wp (ω) −1 10 10 −2 −1 10 10 Frequency (a) Small Gain condition ρ(Em Ĥ) (b) Robust Loopshaping on P̂ MPC Setpoint Tracking Test y2 50 100 0 −0.05 −0.1 −0.15 True Plant Unweighted MFD Weighted MFD 0 10 max 0 Setpoint Weighted MFD 200 150 Unweighted MFD σ y1 Singular Value Plot 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 −1 10 0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200 −2 10 −1 10 u1 10 5 0 u2 σ min 10 −2 10 5 0 0 50 100 Time [min] 150 200 −2 10 Frequencies [Rad/Min] (c) Setpoint Test −1 10 (d) Singular Values Figure 51: Experiment of identification test monitoring (at ncycles = 5) for the JacobsenSkogestad high purity distillation column: Small Gain condition (a), robust loopshaping (b), MPC setpoint test (c), and singular values (d) with MPC tuning set: PH=35, MH=5, Ywt=[1 1], and Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.2 53 Spectral Radius Analysis[ρ(Em H)] Robust Loopshaping with Weighted CR−MFD G(ω) 1 10 0 10 unweighted MFD weighted MFD σmax(Wy S) σmax([r−d]) Amplitude 0 10 −1 10 −1 10 −2 10 Sω Hω δ(S(ω)) δ(H(ω)) Wp (ω) −2 10 −2 −1 10 10 −2 −1 10 10 Frequency (a) Small Gain condition ρ(Em Ĥ) (b) Robust Loopshaping on P̂ MPC Setpoint Tracking Test 50 100 0 −0.05 −0.1 −0.15 Setpoint 150 Weighted MFD 200 Unweighted MFD 0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200 max 0 y2 True Plant Unweighted MFD Weighted MFD 0 10 σ y1 Singular Value Plot 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 −1 10 −2 10 −1 10 u1 20 10 0 −2 10 u2 σ min 20 −3 10 10 0 0 50 100 Time [min] 150 200 −2 10 Frequencies [Rad/Min] (c) Setpoint Test −1 10 (d) Singular Values Figure 52: Experiment of identification test monitoring (at ncycles = 10) for the JacobsenSkogestad high purity distillation column: Small Gain condition (a), robust loopshaping (b), MPC setpoint tracking test (c), and singular values (d) with MPC tuning set: PH=35, MH=5, Ywt=[1 1], and Uwt=[0.05 0.03]*0.2 54 Robust Stability 0.1 10 −0.1 µ 10 −0.3 10 −0.5 10 −0.7 10 −2 10 Frequency [rad/min] −1 10 Figure 53: Experiment (at 5 cycles) of identification test monitoring for the JacobsenSkogestad high purity distillation column: robust stability analysis Robust Stability 0 µ 10 −1 10 −2 10 −2 10 Frequency [rad/min] −1 10 Figure 54: Experiment (at 10 cycles) of identification test monitoring for the JacobsenSkogestad high purity distillation column: robust stability analysis 55 References Braun, M.W., R. Ortiz-Mojica and D.E. Rivera (2002). Application of minimum crest factor multisinusoidal signals for “plant-friendly” identification of nonlinear process systems. Control Engineering Practice 10, 301. Guillaume, P., J. Schoukens, R. Pintelon and I. Kollár (1991). Crest-factor minimization using nonlinear Chebyshev approximation methods. IEEE Trans. on Inst. and Meas. 40(6), 982–989. Hjalmarsson, H. (2005). From experiment design to closed-loop control. Automatica 41, 393–438. Jacobsen, E.W. and S. Skogestad (1994). Inconsistencies in dynamic models for illconditioned plants application to low-order models of distillation columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33, 631–640. Lee, H. (2006). A plant-friendly multivariable system identification framework based on identification test monitoring. PhD thesis. Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Arizona State University. Tempe, AZ, U.S.A. Lee, H. and D.E. Rivera (2004). A control-relevant, plant-friendly system identification methodology using shifted and ”zippered” input signals. In: 2004 AIChE Annual Meeting. Austin, TX. paper 414r. Lee, H. and D.E. Rivera (2005a). Control relevant curvefitting for plant-friendly multivariable system identification. In: 2005 American Control Conference. Portland, OR. pp. 1431–1436. Lee, H. and D.E. Rivera (2005b). An integrated methodology for plant-friendly input signal design and control-relevant estimation of highly interactive processes. In: Annual AIChE 2005 Meeting. Cincinnati, OH. paper 520b. Lee, H., D.E. Rivera and H. D. Mittelmann (2003a). A novel approach to plant-friendly multivariable identification of highly interactive systems. In: Annual AIChE 2003 Meeting. San Francisco, CA. paper 436a. Lee, H., D.E. Rivera and H. Mittelmann (2003b). Constrained minimum crest factor multisine signals for plant-friendly identification of highly interactive systems. In: 13th IFAC Symp. on System Identification. Rotterdam. pp. 947–952. 56 Ljung, L. and T. Glad (1994). Modeling of Dynamic Systems. Prentice-Hall. New Jersey. Morari, M. and E. Zafiriou (1988). Robust Process Control. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prett, D.M. and C.E. Garcı́a (1988). Fundamental Process Control. Butterworth. Stoneham, M.A. Rivera, D.E. and S.V. Gaikwad (1995). Systematic techniques for determining modeling requirements for SISO and MIMO feedback control problems. Journal of Process Control 5(4), 213–224. Rivera, D.E., H. Lee, H.D. Mittelmann and M.W. Braun (2007). High purity distillation: Using plant-friendly multisine signals to identify a strongly interactive process. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 27, 72 – 89. Special section on “Applications of System Identification. Rivera, D.E., H. Lee, M.W. Braun and H.D. Mittelmann (2003). Plant-friendly system identification: a challenge for the process industries. In: 13th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID 2003). Rotterdam, Netherlands. pp. 917–922. Rivera, D.E., M.W. Braun and H.D. Mittelmann (2002). Constrained multisine inputs for plant-friendly identification of chemical process. In: 15th IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain. paper T-We-A11. Sanathanan, C.K. and J. Koerner (1963). Transfer function synthesis as a ratio of two complex polynomials. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 9, 56–58. Schroeder, M.R. (1970). Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory IT-16, 85–89. Stenman, A., F. Gustafsson, D.E. Rivera, L. Ljung and T. McKelvey (2000). On adaptive smoothing of empirical transfer function estimates. Control Engineering Practice 8(2), 1309–1315. 57

Download PDF

- Similar pages
- Trust 10" Zippered Soft Sleeve for tablets
- V7 Professional Sleeve 16"
- Cirkuit Planet CPL-LB2001
- V7 Professional II Frontloader Notebook Case 16"
- V7 Vantage II Frontloader Laptop Case 16"
- Targus Large Digital Camera Case
- Targus TBR003CA
- Case Logic EVA MP3 Travel Accessory Case
- V7 Vantage II Notebook Backpack 16.1"