Click here to read this article in full

Click here to read this article in full
Introduction to Wireless Networking
See our 'Wireless Around the Home' article and our Wireless Networking Prima for a broad
overview. A useful article to read if you are looking to link buildings is Linking Buildings using
Wireless networking is, potentially, a quick and easy and economical alternative to running wires
around your home or office. It also opens up possibilities for connecting buildings which are up to
several kilometres apart. There are currently three standards upon which wireless networking
devices are built. The table summarises some of the features for each
Data Rate
54 Mbps
Product now starting to appear which promise better
obstacle penetration and scatter making them superior for
non-line-of-site (NLOS) operation than the 2.4GHz
products. Larger number of non-overlapping channels also
makes this standard suitable for high cell densities.
11/22 Mbps 2.4GHz
The first system to appear at mass-market pricing. Suitable
for both internal and inter-building applications though
poor penetration and scatter can reduce effectiveness for
both indoor and remote bridging applications.
54 Mbps
Newish 2.4GHz standard gives much the same
functionality as 802.11b but at higher data rates. OFDM
standard is supposed to give improvements over the older
11b products for indoor use. In practice though the lower
signal sensitivity at higher speeds reduces effectiveness.
You will see specifications for different brands of wireless networking devices quoting wildly
different ranges. Take these claims with a pinch of salt. Unless the manufacturers have got
something very wrong, or are operating at illegal power output levels, then products from different
sources will all behave similarly since they are built to the same power standard.
There are two types of application in which wireless networking is used: internal and inter-building.
Radio waves travel in straight lines and at 2.4GHz do not penetrate obstacles very well. Some
surfaces reflect the signals quite well whilst others tend to absorb them. Water, which comprises
most of you , is particularly good at absorbing the energy, so you will find that putting your hand
over an antenna can reduce the signal substantially. (Your hand won't warm up because output
power is limited to 100mW in Europe - well below the power output of your mobile phone!). 5GHz
wireless suffers from similar problems BUT, with better penetration and scatter, it offers
considerably improved non-line-of-site (NLOS) capabilities over 2.4GHz devices.
As a general rule 802.11b/g devices will usually cover a house quite well but there are no
guarantees. You might also find, particularly for 11g, that the connection speeds will drop in order
to get a reliable link. In fact, often an 11g product with up to 54meg potential will give similar
performance to an 11b device even though 11b is only up to 11meg speed. The signal passes better
through wooden floors and ceilings than through brick walls, and has no chance at all through
concrete or stone. The use of an access point in the loft connected to a directional antenna pointing
down from the rafters has proved an effective way to get full coverage in a typical house. For a
more restrictive range the built-in antennas often work very well.
Your choice of wireless network adapter may be significant. If your mini tower PC stands on the
floor with it's back to a radiator, you can't a expect built-in adapter with integral aerial to work very
well. Or if you tend to sit with your notebooks aerial sticking out of the left hand side and your
access point is down the corridor to your right, then the computer itself will screen the signal. Try
an adapter with an external aerial that can see over your keyboard.
See our 'Wireless Around the Home' article for a more in depth discussion on using 2.4GHz
wireless in buildings
802.11a/5GHz radio, although costing a little more than 2.4GHz products, has much better
penetration and scatter making it considerably better for indoors operation where it needs to reach
remote rooms. In our opinion, 5Ghz is the future for wireless networking in buildings
You can read more information on 5GHz wireless in our '5GHz Frequency Bands' Article.
The following table is a guide to the distances you might expect to achieve using 'off-the-shelf'
wireless devices a standard 100mW access point with a given antenna gain at both ends . A receiver
sensitivity of about -83dB is assumed.
Line of sight
range for
(20db UK
power limit)
Line of sight
range for
(30db UK
power limit)
Effective gain takes into account the antenna gain and
also any losses in cabling. For instance if you have a
12dB antenna but lose 5dB in the cable to it, then you
have an effective gain of 7dB.
The table should only be used as a rough guide, we are
not promising that you will achieve these numbers, nor
that the figures represent maximum or minimum limits.
Please also see our article about line-of-sight signal
You should ensure that you do not exceed any legal
power density limits which apply in your region.
Metal, external antennas can make good lightning
conductors! Consider what equipment you are putting at
risk if you choose not to invest in a lightning arrester.
The distance figures for 5GHz operation may look bad
when compared to 2.4GHz but it's worth remembering
that the permitted power output levels for 5Ghz are 4
times those for 2.4GHz wireless! That means, if you stick
to the legal power limits, then the range for 5GHz
devices is about 10 times further than the equivalent
2.4GHz equipment.
Antenna Gain
Q. How does an antenna produce gain?
A. By focusing the available radio energy in one direction.
Q. OK, so how can an 'omni-directional' antenna have gain?
A. Because it radiates around itself in a disc pattern, stealing power from above and below.
The above Q&As should help you get a feel for the radiation pattern for different types of antennas.
A 0dB antenna radiates equally over a complete sphere. Bearing in mind that 3dB represents a
doubling of radiated power, you could imagine a 3dB directional antenna radiating its signal into
one half of that sphere. A 3dB omni-directional antenna would have a radiation pattern in the shape
of a sphere with a cone removed from the top and bottom.
Diversity Receivers
Wireless signals (both 2.4GHz and, to a much greater extent, 5Ghz) reflect readily off many
surfaces, there will often be a pattern of patches around the room where reflected signals cancel out
the direct signals leading to 'dead zones'. If your antenna is in such a dead zone you get no signal.
However, for every dead zone there will be a 'double-power' zone. Due to the shortness of the radio
waves at these high frequencies then the distance between a good patch and a bad patch can be only
a few centimetres Wouldn't it be nice if you could have a second antenna, just a few centimetres
away? Then, there would be a good chance of this second antenna sitting in a better reception zone.
A system with two aerials in this arrangement is called a diversity receiver. Many wireless devices
use diversity receivers to try and improve NLOS operation.
More Articles
More in depth discussions on using wireless devices can be found on the following articles:
Line of Site and building linking
Wireless around the home
Solwise Range R&TTE Certificates
'ADSL Around the Home'
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF