CE940920L22
CE EMC TEST REPORT
REPORT NO. :
MODEL NO. :
RECEIVED :
TESTED :
ISSUED :
CE940920L22
WP54G
Sep. 21, 2005
Nov. 02 ~ Dec. 06, 2005
Dec. 13, 2005
APPLICANT : Compex Systems Pte Ltd.
ADDRESS : 135, Joo Seng Road, #08-01 PM Industrial
Building Singapore 368363
ISSUED BY : Advance Data Technology Corporation
LAB ADDRESS : No. 47, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Tsuen, Lin Kou Hsiang
244, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C.
TEST LOCATION : No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd., Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei
Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C.
This test report consists of 79 pages in total. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the
approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of our
laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by CNLA, A2LA any government
agency. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample
No. 2177-01
Report No.: CE940920L22
1
0528
ILAC MRA
Report Format Version 2.0.4
Table of Contents
1
CERTIFICATION......................................................................................................6
2
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS .............................................................................7
2.1
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ...........................................................................8
3
GENERAL INFORMATION ......................................................................................9
3.1
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT ........................................................................9
3.2
DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODE...........................................................................10
3.3
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLIED STANDARD...................................10
3.4
DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS................................................................... 11
3.5
CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST ....................................................12
4
EMISSION TEST ...................................................................................................17
4.1
CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT .........................................................17
4.1.1
LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT.......................................17
4.1.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................17
4.1.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................18
4.1.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................18
4.1.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................18
4.1.6
EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS...........................................................................19
4.1.7
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................20
4.1.8
TEST RESULTS (B) ..............................................................................................22
4.2
RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ..............................................................24
4.2.1
LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT............................................24
4.2.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................25
4.2.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................26
4.2.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................26
4.2.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................27
4.2.6
EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS...........................................................................27
4.2.7
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................28
4.2.8
TEST RESULTS (B) ..............................................................................................29
4.3
HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT ..........................................................30
4.3.1
LIMITS OF HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT........................................30
4.3.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................30
Report No.: CE940920L22
2
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.3.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................31
4.3.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................31
4.3.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................31
4.3.6
EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS...........................................................................32
4.3.7
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................33
4.4
VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKS MEASUREMENT...................................34
4.4.1
LIMITS OF VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKS MEASUREMENT ................34
4.4.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................34
4.4.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................34
4.4.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................35
4.4.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................35
4.4.6
EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS...........................................................................35
4.4.7
TEST RESULTS ....................................................................................................36
5
IMMUNITY TEST...................................................................................................37
5.1
GENERAL DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................37
5.2
GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION.......................................38
5.3
PARTICULAR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION FOR DATA DISPLAY
FUNCTION OF EUT ..............................................................................................39
5.4
EUT OPERATING CONDITION .............................................................................39
5.5
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE IMMUNITY TEST (ESD).....................................40
5.5.1
TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................40
5.5.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................40
5.5.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................41
5.5.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................42
5.5.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................42
5.5.6
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................43
5.5.7
TEST RESULTS (B) ..............................................................................................45
5.6
RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD IMMUNITY TEST
(RS) .......................................................................................................................47
5.6.1
TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................47
5.6.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................47
5.6.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................48
Report No.: CE940920L22
3
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.6.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................48
5.6.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................49
5.6.6
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................50
5.6.7
TEST RESULTS (B) ..............................................................................................50
5.7
ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT/BURST IMMUNITY TEST (EFT).......................51
5.7.1
TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................51
5.7.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................51
5.7.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................51
5.7.4
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................52
5.7.5
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................53
5.7.6
TEST RESULTS (B) ..............................................................................................53
5.8
SURGE IMMUNITY TEST .....................................................................................54
5.8.1
TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................54
5.8.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................54
5.8.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................55
5.8.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................55
5.8.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................56
5.8.6
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................57
5.9
IMMUNITY TO CONDUCTED DISTURBANCES INDUCED BY RF FIELDS (CS) .58
5.9.1
TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................58
5.9.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................58
5.9.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................59
5.9.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................59
5.9.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................60
5.9.6
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................61
5.9.7
TEST RESULTS (B) ..............................................................................................61
5.10
POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD IMMUNITY TEST ...............................62
5.10.1
TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................62
5.10.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................62
5.10.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................62
5.10.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................62
5.10.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................63
Report No.: CE940920L22
4
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.10.6
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................64
5.10.7
TEST RESULTS (B) ..............................................................................................64
5.11
VOLTAGE DIP/SHORT INTERRUPTIONS/VOLTAGE VARIATIONS (DIP)
IMMUNITY TEST...................................................................................................65
5.11.1
TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................65
5.11.2
TEST INSTRUMENTS...........................................................................................65
5.11.3
TEST PROCEDURE..............................................................................................65
5.11.4
DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................65
5.11.5
TEST SETUP ........................................................................................................66
5.11.6
TEST RESULTS (A) ..............................................................................................67
6
PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION.............................................68
7
APPENDIX - INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES ......................79
Report No.: CE940920L22
5
Report Format Version 2.0.4
1 CERTIFICATION
PRODUCT : NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G NETWORK ACCESS POINT
BRAND NAME : Compex
MODEL NO. : WP54G
APPLICANT : Compex Systems Pte Ltd.
TESTED : Nov. 02 ~ Dec. 06, 2005
TEST SAMPLE : ENGINEERING SAMPLE
STANDARDS : EN 55022:1994+A1:1995
EN 55024:1998+A1:2001
+A2:1997, Class B
+A2:2003
EN 61000-3-2:2000, Class A (refer IEC 61000-4-2:2001
to *Note below)
IEC 61000-4-3:2002+A1:2002
EN 61000-3-3:1995+A1:2001
IEC 61000-4-4:2004
IEC 61000-4-5:2001
IEC 61000-4-6:2003+A1:2004
IEC 61000-4-8:2001
IEC 61000-4-11:2004
The above equipment (model: WP54G) has been tested by Advance Data
Technology Corporation, and found compliance with the requirement of the above
standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT)
configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the
measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in
this report.
PREPARED BY :
, DATE :
Dec. 13, 2005
, DATE :
Dec. 13, 2005
, DATE :
Dec. 13, 2005
( Suntee Liu )
TECHNICAL
ACCEPTANCE :
Responsible for EMC
( Clark Lin )
APPROVED BY :
( Ken Lu / Manager )
*Note: The power consumption of EUT is 10W, which is less than 75W and no limits apply. Therefore it
is deemed to comply with EN 61000-3-2 without any testing.
Report No.: CE940920L22
6
Report Format Version 2.0.4
2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
After estimating all the combination of every test mode, the result shown as below is
the worst case.
The EUT has been tested according to the following specifications:
Standard
EN 55022:1994
+A1:1995+A2:1997,
Class B
EN61000-3-2:2000,
Class A
EN 61000-3-3:1995
+A1:2001
EMISSION
Test Type
Result
Conducted test
PASS
Radiated test
PASS
Harmonic current
emissions
Voltage fluctuations &
flicker
Remarks
Meet the requirement of limit
Minimum passing margin is
-0.64dB at 23.129MHz
Meet the requirement of limit
Minimum passing margin is
-1.24dB at 375.02MHz
PASS
Meets the requirements
PASS
Meets the requirements
NOTE: The information of measurement uncertainty is available upon the customer’s request.
Report No.: CE940920L22
7
Report Format Version 2.0.4
IMMUNITY (EN 55024:1998+A1:2001+A2+2003)
Test Type
Result
Remarks
Electrostatic discharge
Meets the requirements of
IEC 61000-4-2:2001
PASS
immunity test
Performance Criterion B
Radiated, radioIEC 61000-4-3:2002
frequency,
Meets the requirements of
PASS
electromagnetic field
+A1:2002
Performance Criterion A
immunity test
Electrical fast transient /
Meets the requirements of
IEC 61000-4-4:2004
PASS
burst immunity test.
Performance Criterion A
Meets the requirements of
IEC 61000-4-5:2001
Surge immunity test
PASS
Performance Criterion A
Immunity to conducted
IEC 61000-4-6:2003
Meets the requirements of
PASS
disturbances, induced by
+A1:2004
Performance Criterion A
radio-frequency fields
Power frequency
Meets the requirements of
IEC 61000-4-8:2001
PASS
magnetic field immunity
Performance Criterion A
test.
Meets the requirements of
Voltage Dips:
1. >95% reduction Voltage dips, short
Performance Criterion A
IEC 61000-4-11:2004 interruptions and voltage
PASS 2. 30% reduction –
variations immunity tests
Performance Criterion A
Voltage Interruptions:
1. >95% reduction –
Performance Criterion B
Standard
2.1 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated
for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4:
Measurement
Conducted emissions
Radiated emissions
Frequency
9kHz~30MHz
30MHz ~ 200MHz (Horizontal)
30MHz ~ 200MHz (Vertical)
200MHz ~1000MHz (Horizontal)
200MHz ~1000MHz (Vertical)
1GHz ~ 18GHz
18GHz ~ 40GHz
Uncertainty
2.44 dB
3.58 dB
3.73 dB
3.75 dB
3.73 dB
2.26 dB
1.94 dB
This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the
95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.
Report No.: CE940920L22
8
Report Format Version 2.0.4
3 GENERAL INFORMATION
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT
PRODUCT
MODEL NO.
POWER SUPPLY
DATA CABLE
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G NETWORK ACCESS POINT
WP54G
9Vdc from adapter
12Vdc from POE
1.6 m non-shielded RJ45 UTP cable without core
NOTE:
1. The EUT is powered by the following power supplies.
POE for EMI test:
Brand
Ktec
Model
KSAFD1200150W1EU
Input Power
100~240Vac, 50/60Hz, 0.4A
Output Power 12Vdc, 1.5A
POE for EMS test:
Brand
Netstar
Model
POE101A
Input Power
100~240Vac, 50/60Hz, 0.25A
Output Power 48Vdc, 0.3A
Adapter:
Brand
OEM
Model
AD-0970B
Input Power
230Vac, 50Hz, 80mA
Output Power 9Vdc, 700mA
Power Cord
1.83 m non-shielded cable without core
2. The above EUT information was declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features
description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual.
Report No.: CE940920L22
9
Report Format Version 2.0.4
3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODE
2 samples are provided for testing. Sample 1C could be powered by the adapter or
the POE. Sample 1B only could be powered by the POE.
The EUT was pre-tested under following test modes. The test mode 1 and 3 are to be
worst cases, and presented in the report.
Test Mode
Test Condition
1
1C is powered by adapter
2
1C is powered by POE
3
1B is powered by POE
Test results are presented in the report as below.
Test Results
Test Condition
A
1C is powered by adapter
B
1B is powered by POE
3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLIED STANDARD
The EUT is a kind of ITE equipment and, according to the specifications of the
manufacturers, must comply with the requirements of the following standards:
EN 55022:1994+A1:1995 +A2:1997,
Class B
EN 61000-3-2:2000, Class A
EN 61000-3-3:1995+A1:2001
EN 55024:1998+A1:2001+A2:2003
IEC 61000-4-2:2001
IEC 61000-4-3:2002+A1:2002
IEC 61000-4-4:2004
IEC 61000-4-5:2001
IEC 61000-4-6:2003+A1:2004
IEC 61000-4-8:2001
IEC 61000-4-11:2004
All tests have been performed and recorded as per the above standards.
Report No.: CE940920L22
10
Report Format Version 2.0.4
3.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS
The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary
accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to
form a representative test configuration during the tests.
For emission test
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
PRODUCT
NOTEBOOK
NOTEBOOK
NOTEBOOK
PRINTER
MODEM
POE
BRAND
DELL
DELL
DELL
EPSON
ACEEX
LINKSYS
MODEL NO.
PP05L
D600
PP11L
LQ-300+
1414V/3
WAPPOE12
SERIAL NO.
27368374672
F8HBC1S
9Y27F1S
DCGY054105
0401008273
NA
FCC ID
E2K24CLNS
E2K24CLNS
FCC DOC
FCC DoC Approved
IFAXDM1414
NA
SIGNAL CABLE DESCRIPTION OF THE ABOVE SUPPORT UNITS
NA
NA
NA
1.8 m shielded cable
1.6 m shielded cable
NA
NOTE:
1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m).
2. Item 2 and 6 acted as communication partners to transfer data.
For harmonics, flicker and immunity test
NO.
1
2
3
PRODUCT
NOTEBOOK
COMPUTER
NOTEBOOK
COMPUTER
Standard PoE
NO.
1 NA
2 NA
3 NA
BRAND
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO.
FCC ID
DELL
PP05L
3616274224
E2K24CLNS
ASUS
A2400H
41NP025671
NA
Netstar
POE101A
NA
NA
SIGNAL CABLE DESCRIPTION OF THE ABOVE SUPPORT UNITS
NOTE:
1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m).
2. Item 1-3 acted as communication partners to transfer data.
Report No.: CE940920L22
11
Report Format Version 2.0.4
3.5
CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST
For conducted & radiated emission test (test results A)
(Power from adapter)
RJ45 UTP cable
RJ45 UTP cable
EUT
Notebook
Modem
Printer
*Test Table
Notebook
Notebook
*Kept in a remote area
Report No.: CE940920L22
12
Report Format Version 2.0.4
For conducted emission test (test results B)
(Power from POE)
RJ45 UTP cable
POE
EUT
RJ45 UTP cable
Notebook
Modem
Printer
*Test Table
RJ45 UTP cable
Notebook
Notebook
*Kept in a remote area
Report No.: CE940920L22
13
Report Format Version 2.0.4
For radiated emission test (test results B)
(Power from POE)
RJ45 UTP cable
RJ45 UTP cable
EUT
Notebook
Modem
Printer
*Test Table
RJ45 UTP cable
POE
Notebook
Notebook
*Kept in a remote area
Report No.: CE940920L22
14
Report Format Version 2.0.4
For harmonics, flicker and immunity test (test results A)
(Power from adapter)
RJ45 UTP cable
EUT
*Test Table
Notebook
Notebook
*Kept in a remote area
Report No.: CE940920L22
15
Report Format Version 2.0.4
For immunity test (test results B)
(Power from POE)
RJ45 UTP cable
EUT
*Test Table
POE
Notebook
Notebook
*Kept in a remote area
Report No.: CE940920L22
16
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4 EMISSION TEST
4.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
4.1.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
FREQUENCY (MHz)
0.15 - 0.5
0.50 - 5.0
5.0 - 30.0
NOTE:
Class A (dBuV)
Quasi-peak
Average
79
66
73
60
73
60
Class B (dBuV)
Quasi-peak
Average
66 - 56
56 - 46
56
46
60
50
(1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
(2) The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to
0.50 MHz.
(3) All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of
conductors and apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field
strengths specified above.
4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO.
CALIBRATED UNTIL
Test Receiver
ESCS30
100291
Nov. 11, 2006
ROHDE & SCHWARZ
RF signal cable
5D-FB
Cable-HYC01-01
Jan. 09, 2006
Woken
LISN
NNBL 8226-2
8226-142
May. 02, 2006
SCHWARZBECK
LISN
ESH2-Z5
100104
Feb. 15, 2006
ROHDE & SCHWARZ
Software
ADT_Cond_V3
NA
NA
ADT
NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in HwaYa Shielded Room 1.
3. The VCCI Site Registration No. is C-2040.
Report No.: CE940920L22
17
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with
EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization
network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through
another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 Ohm/ 50uH of coupling impedance for the
measuring instrument.
b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum
conducted interference.
c. The frequency range from 150 kHz to 30 MHz was searched. Emission levels under
(Limit - 20dB) was not reported.
4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
4.1.5 TEST SETUP
Ve rtic a l G ro u n d
R e fe re n c e P la n e
40cm
Te s t R e c e iv e r
EUT
80cm
L IS N
H o r i z o n ta l G r o u n d
R e f e r e n c e P la n e
N o t e : 1 .S u p p o r t u n i ts w e r e c o n n e c t e d t o s e c o n d L I S N .
2 .B o t h o f L I S N s ( A M N ) a r e 8 0 c m f r o m E U T a n d a t le a s t 8 0 c m
f r o m o t h e r u n its a n d o t h e r m e ta l p l a n e s
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Report No.: CE940920L22
18
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS
a. The notebook ran a test program to enable all functions.
b. The notebook sent “H” messages to the printer and the printer printed “H” patterns.
c. The notebook sent “H” messages to its screen and the screen displayed “H”
patterns.
d. The notebook sent “H” messages to the modem.
e. The EUT communicated data with the notebooks via wired and wireless
transmission.
f. Steps b ~ e were repeated.
Report No.: CE940920L22
19
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.1.7 TEST RESULTS (A)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
6dB
230 Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
BANDWIDTH
ENVIRONMENTAL 25 deg.C, 70% RH,
PHASE
CONDITIONS
1000 hPa
EUT
TESTED BY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 kHz
Line 1
Skys Huang
Freq.
Corr.
Reading Value
[MHz]
0.306
0.588
0.716
0.818
16.229
20.258
21.664
23.129
Factor
(dB)
0.11
0.15
0.18
0.20
0.67
1.05
1.14
1.23
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
38.66
43.15
44.29
41.24
51.85 48.25
49.63 46.55
49.59 46.93
51.06 48.13
No
WP54G
Emission
Level
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
38.77
43.30
44.47
41.44
52.52 48.92
50.68 47.60
50.73 48.07
52.29 49.36
Limit
Margin
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
60.07 50.07
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
(dB)
Q.P.
AV.
-21.30
-12.70
-11.53
-14.56
-7.48
-1.08
-9.32
-2.40
-9.27
-1.93
-7.71
-0.64
REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually.
2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and
measurement with the average detector is unnecessary.
3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value
5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value.
Report No.: CE940920L22
20
Report Format Version 2.0.4
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
6dB
230 Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
BANDWIDTH
ENVIRONMENTAL 25 deg.C, 70% RH,
PHASE
CONDITIONS
1000 hPa
EUT
TESTED BY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9 kHz
Line 2
Skys Huang
Freq.
Corr.
Reading Value
[MHz]
0.166
0.341
0.912
16.230
19.710
21.664
23.129
Factor
(dB)
0.11
0.11
0.22
0.52
0.71
0.77
0.81
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
40.43
38.78
39.35
47.82
47.24
46.36
47.87
-
No
WP54G
Emission
Level
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
40.54
38.89
39.57
48.34
47.95
47.13
48.68
-
Limit
Margin
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
65.18 55.18
59.17 49.17
56.00 46.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
(dB)
Q.P.
-24.64
-20.28
-16.43
-11.66
-12.05
-12.87
-11.32
AV.
-
REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually.
2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and
measurement with the average detector is unnecessary.
3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value
5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value.
Report No.: CE940920L22
21
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.1.8 TEST RESULTS (B)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
6dB
230 Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
BANDWIDTH
ENVIRONMENTAL 25 deg.C, 70% RH,
PHASE
CONDITIONS
1000 hPa
EUT
TESTED BY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 kHz
Line 1
Skys Huang
Freq.
Corr.
Reading Value
[MHz]
0.150
0.369
0.890
0.965
1.559
7.491
20.258
23.129
Factor
(dB)
0.11
0.11
0.22
0.23
0.25
0.48
1.05
1.23
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
45.91
43.60
44.01
44.18
42.13
35.52
42.12
46.63
-
No
WP54G
Emission
Level
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
46.02
43.71
44.23
44.41
42.38
36.00
43.17
47.86
-
Limit
Margin
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
66.00 56.00
58.53 48.53
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
(dB)
Q.P.
-19.98
-14.82
-11.77
-11.59
-13.62
-24.00
-16.83
-12.14
AV.
-
REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually.
2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and
measurement with the average detector is unnecessary.
3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value
5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value.
Report No.: CE940920L22
22
Report Format Version 2.0.4
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
6dB
230 Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
BANDWIDTH
ENVIRONMENTAL 25 deg.C, 70% RH,
PHASE
CONDITIONS
1000 hPa
EUT
TESTED BY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
9 kHz
Line 2
Skys Huang
Freq.
Corr.
Reading Value
[MHz]
0.151
0.371
0.814
0.888
0.963
1.039
1.480
1.559
1.633
4.820
5.486
21.664
Factor
(dB)
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.22
0.23
0.24
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.40
0.40
0.77
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
45.07
48.82 45.07
45.19
46.78 43.04
46.61 42.95
45.42
41.30
43.36
43.05
43.43
46.94
45.42
-
No
WP54G
Emission
Level
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
45.18
48.93 45.18
45.39
47.00 43.26
46.84 43.18
45.66
41.55
43.61
43.30
43.83
47.34
46.19
-
Limit
Margin
[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
AV.
65.97 55.97
58.49 48.49
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
56.00 46.00
60.00 50.00
60.00 50.00
(dB)
Q.P.
AV.
-20.80
-9.56
-3.31
-10.61
-9.00
-2.74
-9.16
-2.82
-10.34
-14.45
-12.39
-12.70
-12.17
-12.66
-13.81
-
REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually.
2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and
measurement with the average detector is unnecessary.
3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value
5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value.
Report No.: CE940920L22
23
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.2 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
4.2.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
Class A (at 10m)
Class B (at 10m)
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
30~230
40
30
230~1000
47
37
FREQUENCY (MHz)
NOTE:
1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m).
3. All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors
and apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above.
Report No.: CE940920L22
24
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION &
MANUFACTURER
Test Receiver
ROHDE & SCHWARZ
Test Receiver
ROHDE & SCHWARZ
Spectrum Analyzer
Agilent
BILOG Antenna
SCHWARZBECK
BILOG Antenna
SCHWARZBECK
HORN Antenna
EMCO
Preamplifier
Agilent
Preamplifier
Agilent
Preamplifier
Agilent
RF signal cable
Woken
RF signal cable
Woken
RF signal cable
HUBER+SUHNER
Software
ADT
Antenna Tower
HD Deisel GmbH
Antenna Tower
HD Deisel GmbH
Turn Table
HD Deisel GmbH
Controller
HD Deisel GmbH
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO.
CALIBRATED
UNTIL
ESIB7
100212
May 06, 2006
ESIB7
100187
Nov. 28, 2006
8564EC
4208A00662
Dec. 20, 2005
VULB9168
9168-148
Nov. 01, 2006
VULB9168
9168-149
Nov. 01, 2006
3115
5623
Jul. 13, 2006
8447D
2944A10636
Dec. 05, 2006
8447D
2944A10637
Dec. 05, 2006
8449B
3008A01959
Dec. 21, 2005
8D-FB
Cable-Hych1-01
Jun. 02, 2006
8D-FB
Cable-Hych1-02
Jun. 02, 2006
SUCOFLEX 104
218186/4
Nov. 16, 2006
ADT_Radiated_V7
NA
NA
MA240
11030
NA
MA240
12030
NA
DS430
50303
NA
HD2000
18303
NA
NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in HwaYa Chamber 1.
3. The VCCI Site Registration No. is R-1893.
4. The IC Site Registration No. is IC4924-1.
Report No.: CE940920L22
25
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground
at a 10 meters semi-anechoic chamber. The table was rotated 360 degrees to
determine the position of the highest radiation.
b. The EUT was set 10 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna,
which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower.
c. The antenna is a broadband antenna, and its height is varied from one meter to
four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field
strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to
make the measurement.
d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then
the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable
table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading.
e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified
bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is below 1 GHz.
NOTE: The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is
120kHz for quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency below 1GHz.
4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
Report No.: CE940920L22
26
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.2.5 TEST SETUP
Ant. Tower
EUT&
Support Units
1-4m
Variable
10m
Turn Table
80cm
Ground Plane
Test Receiver
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
4.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS
Same as item 4.1.6.
Report No.: CE940920L22
27
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.2.7 TEST RESULTS (A)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL NO.
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
EUT
FREQUENCY
30 ~ 1000 MHz
RANGE
ENVIRONMENTAL 24 deg. C, 67% RH,
CONDITIONS
1000 hPa
TESTED BY
WP54G
INPUT POWER
230 Vac, 50 Hz
DETECTOR
FUNCTION
Quasi-Peak
Scott Yang
ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 10 M
No.
Freq.
(MHz)
1
2
129.14
249.66
Emission
Level
(dBuV/m)
23.43 QP
31.57 QP
3
4
5
6
7
348.80
400.01
442.10
700.64
970.84
32.77 QP
31.95 QP
28.71 QP
28.32 QP
29.24 QP
-6.57
-5.43
Antenna
Height
(m)
3.50 H
4.00 H
Table
Angle
(Degree)
201
273
Raw
Value
(dBuV)
10.85
19.09
Correction
Factor
(dB/m)
12.58
12.47
-4.23
-5.05
-8.29
-8.68
-7.76
3.00 H
2.50 H
2.00 H
4.00 H
2.00 H
280
53
228
221
213
16.62
14.23
10.08
4.24
1.05
16.14
17.72
18.63
24.08
28.19
Limit
(dBuV/m)
Margin
(dB)
30.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 10 M
No.
Freq.
(MHz)
1
61.10
Emission
Level
(dBuV/m)
25.11 QP
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
86.37
107.31
126.00
166.07
173.85
249.66
348.80
700.64
25.35 QP
24.36 QP
24.14 QP
24.60 QP
26.92 QP
30.73 QP
27.29 QP
30.45 QP
REMARKS:
-4.89
Antenna
Height
(m)
2.50 V
Table
Angle
(Degree)
45
Raw
Value
(dBuV)
11.83
Correction
Factor
(dB/m)
13.27
-4.65
-5.64
-5.86
-5.40
-3.08
-6.27
-9.71
-6.55
1.50 V
1.50 V
1.50 V
1.50 V
1.00 V
2.00 V
3.50 V
2.50 V
2
2
209
151
202
93
149
127
15.90
13.43
11.38
10.87
13.64
17.50
10.22
5.08
9.46
10.92
12.76
13.73
13.28
13.23
17.06
25.37
Limit
(dBuV/m)
Margin
(dB)
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
1. Emission level(dBuV/m)=Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m)
2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB)
3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value.
Report No.: CE940920L22
28
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.2.8 TEST RESULTS (B)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL NO.
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
EUT
FREQUENCY
30 ~ 1000 MHz
RANGE
ENVIRONMENTAL 24 deg. C, 67% RH,
CONDITIONS
1000 hPa
TESTED BY
WP54G
INPUT POWER 230 Vac, 50 Hz
DETECTOR
FUNCTION
Quasi-Peak
Scott Yang
ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 10 M
No.
Freq.
(MHz)
1
2
162.16
250.00
Emission
Level
(dBuV/m)
26.46 QP
34.81 QP
3
4
5
6
7
8
302.06
348.80
375.02
700.64
788.12
875.59
27.63 QP
33.41 QP
35.76 QP
30.52 QP
31.38 QP
34.56 QP
-3.54
-2.19
Antenna
Height
(m)
3.50 H
3.50 H
Table
Angle
(Degree)
265
277
Raw
Value
(dBuV)
12.91
22.31
Correction
Factor
(dB/m)
13.55
12.50
-9.37
-3.59
-1.24
-6.48
-5.62
-2.44
3.00 H
2.50 H
2.16 H
1.50 H
1.50 H
1.00 H
158
346
325
171
190
323
12.12
17.27
18.82
6.44
5.61
7.75
15.52
16.14
16.94
24.08
25.77
26.81
Limit
(dBuV/m)
Margin
(dB)
30.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 10 M
No.
Freq.
(MHz)
Emission
Level
(dBuV/m)
Limit
(dBuV/m)
Margin
(dB)
Antenna
Height
(m)
Table
Angle
(Degree)
Raw
Value
(dBuV)
Correction
Factor
(dB/m)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
30.63
64.78
87.49
98.47
166.39
189.40
249.66
304.09
375.00
799.78
875.59
953.35
21.58 QP
28.54 QP
25.70 QP
26.04 QP
24.93 QP
27.80 QP
33.64 QP
30.50 QP
34.29 QP
31.23 QP
31.63 QP
32.46 QP
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
-8.42
-1.46
-4.30
-3.96
-5.07
-2.20
-3.36
-6.50
-2.71
-5.77
-5.37
-4.54
2.50 V
3.50 V
1.00 V
1.50 V
1.50 V
1.00 V
1.00 V
1.00 V
1.50 V
2.00 V
2.00 V
2.00 V
93
336
90
343
2
57
114
312
254
159
141
51
9.09
15.68
16.39
16.38
11.22
15.57
20.41
14.02
16.40
4.00
3.44
2.94
12.49
12.86
9.32
9.66
13.71
12.23
13.23
16.47
17.89
27.23
28.20
29.51
REMARKS:
1. Emission level(dBuV/m)=Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m)
2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB)
3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value.
Report No.: CE940920L22
29
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.3 HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT
4.3.1 LIMITS OF HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT
Limits for Class A equipment
Harmonics Max. permissible
Order
harmonics current
n
A
Odd harmonics
3
2.30
5
1.14
7
0.77
9
0.40
11
0.33
13
0.21
15<=n<=39 0.15x15/n
Even harmonics
2
1.08
4
0.43
6
0.30
8<=n<=40 0.23x8/n
Harmonics
Order
n
3
5
7
9
11
13
15<=n<=39
Limits for Class D equipment
Max. permissible
Max. permissible
harmonics current per
harmonics current
watt mA/W
A
Odd Harmonics only
3.4
2.30
1.9
1.14
1.0
0.77
0.5
0.40
0.35
0.33
0.30
0.21
3.85/n
0.15x15/n
NOTE: 1.Class A and Class D are classified according to item section 5 of EN 61000-3-2.
2.According to section 7 of EN61000-3-2, the above limits for all equipment except for
lighting equipment having an active input power > 75 W and no limits apply for equipment
with an active input power up to and including 75 W.
4.3.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
Schaffner AC Power
Source
Schaffner Signal Conditioning
Unit- Lumped Impedance
Software
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO. CALIBRATED UNTIL
NSG1007
55616
Nov. 21, 2006
CCN1000-1-LR1
72224
Nov. 21, 2006
Shchaffner Win
2100V3
NA
NA
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya EMS Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
Report No.: CE940920L22
30
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.3.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. The EUT was placed on the top of a wooden table 0.8 meters above the ground
and operated to produce the maximum harmonic components under normal
operating conditions for each successive harmonic component in turn.
b. The classification of EUT is according to section 5 of EN 61000-3-2: 2000.
The EUT is classified as follows:
Class A: Balanced three-phase equipment, Household appliances excluding
equipment as Class D, Tools excluding portable tools, Dimmers for
incandescent lamps, audio equipment, equipment not specified in one of
the three other classes.
Class B: Portable tools. Arc welding equipment which is not professional
equipment
Class C: Lighting equipment, including dimming devices.
Class D: Equipment having a specified power less than or equal to 600 W of the
following types: Personal computers and personal computer monitors.
c. The correspondent test program of test instrument to measure the current
harmonics emanated from EUT is chosen. The measure time shall be not less
than the time necessary for the EUT to be exercised.
4.3.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
4.3.5 TEST SETUP
EUT
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Report No.: CE940920L22
31
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.3.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS
a. The notebook ran a test program to enable all functions.
b. The notebook sent “H” messages to its screen and the screen displayed “H”
patterns.
c. The EUT communicated data with the notebooks via wired and wireless
transmission.
d. Steps b ~ c were repeated.
Report No.: CE940920L22
32
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.3.7 TEST RESULTS (A)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
FUNDAMENTAL
POWER
230.15 Vrms
VOLTAGE/AMPERE 0.036 Arms
FREQUENCY
RATED POWER
POWER
6W
CONSUMPTION
FACTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL
22 deg. C, 64% RH,
TESTED BY
CONDITIONS
1000 hPa
EUT
WP54G
50 Hz
0.713
Dark Su
NOTE: 1. Limits are not specified for equipment with a rated power of 75W or less (other than lighting
equipment).
2. According to EN61000-3-2 the manufacturer shall specify the power of the apparatus. This
value shall be used for establishing limits. The specified power shall be within +/-10% of the
measured power.
Report No.: CE940920L22
33
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.4 VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKS MEASUREMENT
4.4.1 LIMITS OF VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKS
MEASUREMENT
TEST ITEM
Pst
LIMIT
1.0
Plt
0.65
Tdt (ms)
500
dmax (%)
4%
dc (%)
3.3%
NOTE
Pst means short-term flicker indicator.
Plt means long-term flicker indicator.
Tdt means maximum time that dt exceeds
3.3 %.
dmax means maximum relative voltage
change.
dc means relative steady-state voltage
change
4.4.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
Schaffner AC Power
Source
Schaffner Signal Conditioning
Unit- Lumped Impedance
Software
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO. CALIBRATED UNTIL
NSG1007
55616
Nov. 21, 2006
CCN1000-1-LR1
72224
Nov. 21, 2006
Shchaffner Win
2100V3
NA
NA
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya EMS Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
4.4.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. The EUT was placed on the top of a wooden table 0.8 meters above the ground
and operated to produce the most unfavorable sequence of voltage changes
under normal operating conditions.
b. During the flick measurement, the measure time shall include that part of whole
operation cycle in which the EUT produce the most unfavorable sequence of
voltage changes. The observation period for short-term flicker indicator is 10
minutes and the observation period for long-term flicker indicator is 2 hours.
Report No.: CE940920L22
34
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.4.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
4.4.5 TEST SETUP
EUT
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
4.4.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS
Same as item 4.3.6.
Report No.: CE940920L22
35
Report Format Version 2.0.4
4.4.7 TEST RESULTS
FUNDAMENTAL
VOLTAGE/AMPERE
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
POWER
Operating
FREQUENCY
POWER
230.09 Vrms
FACTOR
0.036 Arms
OBSERVATION
22 deg. C, 64% RH,
PERIOD (Tp)
1000 hPa
TESTED BY
Dark Su
EUT
MODE
WP54G
50.00 Hz
0.713
10 mins
TEST PARAMETER
MEASUREMENT
VALUE
LIMIT
REMARKS
Pst
0.001
1.0
PASS
Plt
0.001
0.65
PASS
Tdt (ms)
0
500
PASS
dmax (%)
0
4%
PASS
dc (%)
0
3.3%
PASS
NOTE:
1. Pst means short-term flicker indicator.
2. Plt means long-term flicker indicator.
3. Tdt means maximum time that dt exceeds 3.3 %.
4. dmax means maximum relative voltage change.
5. dc means relative steady-state voltage change.
Report No.: CE940920L22
36
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5 IMMUNITY TEST
5.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Product Standard
Basic Standard,
specification
requirement, and
Performance
Criteria
EN 55024:1998+A1:2001+A2:2003
IEC 61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge – ESD:
8kV air discharge, 4kV Contact
discharge,
Performance Criterion B
IEC 61000-4-3 Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field
Susceptibility Test – RS:
80-1000 MHz, 3V/m, 80% AM (1kHz),
Performance Criterion A
IEC 61000-4-4 Electrical Fast Transient/Burst - EFT,
Power line: 1kV, Signal line: 0.5kV,
Performance Criterion B
IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Immunity Test:
1.2/50 us Open Circuit Voltage, 8 /20 us
Short Circuit Current,
Power Line - line to line: 1 kV, line to
earth: 2kV,
Performance Criterion B
IEC 61000-4-6 Conducted Radio Frequency
Disturbances Test – CS:
0.15-80 MHz, 3Vrms, 80% AM, 1kHz,
Performance Criterion A
IEC 61000-4-8 Power Frequency Magnetic Field Test,
50 Hz, 1A/m,
Performance Criterion A
IEC 61000-4-11 Voltage Dips:
i) >95% reduction -0.5 period,
Performance Criterion B
ii) 30% reduction – 25 period,
Performance Criterion C
Voltage Interruptions:
i) >95% reduction – 250 period,
Performance Criterion C
Report No.: CE940920L22
37
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.2 GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION
According to Clause 7.1 of EN EN 55024 standard, the following describes the
general performance criteria.
The equipment shall continue to operate as intended without
operator intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of
function is allowed below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended. The
performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
Criterion A
performance. If the minimum performance level or the permissible
performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either
of these may be derived from the product description and
documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect from
the equipment if used as intended.
After the test, the equipment shall continue to operate as intended
without operator intervention. No degradation of performance or
loss of function is allowed, after the application of the phenomenon
below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the
equipment is used as intended. The performance level may be
replaced by a permissible loss of performance.
Criterion B
During the test, degradation of performance is allowed. However,
no change of operating state if stored data is allowed to persist
after the test. If the minimum performance level (or the permissible
performance loss) is not specified by the manufacturer, then either
of these may be derived from the product description and
documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect from
the equipment if used as intended.
Loss of function is allowed, provided the function is selfrecoverable, or can be restored by the operation of the controls by
Criterion C
the user in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
Functions, and/or information stored in non-volatile memory, or
protected by a battery backup, shall not be lost.
Report No.: CE940920L22
38
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.3 PARTICULAR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION FOR
DATA DISPLAY FUNCTION OF EUT
Criterion A
Criterion B
Criterion C
When seen from normal viewing distance, the EUT shall operate
with no change beyond the manufacturer’s specification, in flicker,
color, focus and jitter (except for the power magnetic field test).
Screen disturbances during the application of the test are
permissible.
Failures which are not self-recovered after removal of the external
disturbance, but which can be recovered to normal operation by
reset or reboot are permissible.
5.4 EUT OPERATING CONDITION
Same as item 4.3.6.
Report No.: CE940920L22
39
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.5 ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE IMMUNITY TEST (ESD)
5.5.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Discharge Impedance:
Discharge Voltage:
Polarity:
Number of Discharge:
Discharge Mode:
Discharge Period:
IEC 61000-4-2
330 ohm / 150 pF
Air Discharge: 2; 4; 8 kV (Direct)
Contact Discharge: 2; 4 kV (Direct/Indirect)
Positive & Negative
Air Discharge: min. 20 times at each test point
Contact Discharge: min. 50 times at each test point
Single Discharge
1 second minimum
5.5.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO. CALIBRATED UNTIL
Thermo ESD Simulator
MZ-15/EC
0310225
Sep. 29, 2006
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE
ESD 30C
1003-12
Jul. 10, 2006
ESS-2000
ESS0382041
Dec. 30, 2005
NOISEKEN ELECTRONIC
DISCHARGE SIMULATOR
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya ESD Room No. 1.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
Report No.: CE940920L22
40
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.5.3 TEST PROCEDURE
The discharges shall be applied in two ways:
a. Contact discharges to the conductive surfaces and coupling planes:
The EUT shall be exposed to at least 200 discharges, 100 each at negative and
positive polarity, at a minimum of four test points. One of the test points shall be
subjected to at least 50 indirect discharges to the center of the front edge of the
horizontal coupling plane. The remaining three test points shall each receive at
least 50 direct contact discharges. If no direct contact test points are available,
then at least 200 indirect discharges shall be applied in the indirect mode. Test
shall be performed at a maximum repetition rate of one discharge per second.
b. Air discharges at slots and apertures and insulating surfaces:
On those parts of the EUT where it is not possible to perform contact discharge
testing, the equipment should be investigated to identify user accessible points
where breakdown may occur. Such points are tested using the air discharge
method. This investigation should be restricted to those area normally handled
by the user. A minimum of 10 single air discharges shall be applied to the
selected test point for each such area.
The basic test procedure was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-2:
a. Electrostatic discharges were applied only to those points and surfaces of the
EUT that are accessible to users during normal operation.
b. The test was performed with at least ten single discharges on the pre-selected
points in the most sensitive polarity.
c. The time interval between two successive single discharges was at least 1
second.
d. The ESD generator was held perpendicularly to the surface to which the
discharge was applied and the return cable was at least 0.2 meters from the
EUT.
e. Contact discharges were applied to the non-insulating coating, with the pointed
tip of the generator penetrating the coating and contacting the conducting
substrate.
f. Air discharges were applied with the round discharge tip of the discharge
electrode approaching the EUT as fast as possible (without causing mechanical
damage) to touch the EUT. After each discharge, the ESD generator was
removed from the EUT and re-triggered for a new single discharge. The test
was repeated until all discharges were complete.
g. At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to the
Horizontal Coupling Plane at points on each side of the EUT. The ESD
generator was positioned vertically at a distance of 0.1 meters from the EUT
with the discharge electrode touching the HCP.
h. At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to the
center of one vertical edge of the Vertical Coupling Plane in sufficiently different
positions that the four faces of the EUT were completely illuminated. The VCP
(dimensions 0.5m x 0.5m) was placed vertically to and 0.1 meters from the
EUT.
Report No.: CE940920L22
41
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.5.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
5.5.5 TEST SETUP
0.1m
1m
Vertical
coupling plane
0.5mm Isolation Support
ESD
Generator
EUT
470k
X4
Nearest
Wall
80cm
Horizontal
coupling plane
PS
Reference Ground Plane
Ground Reference Plane
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
NOTE:
TABLE-TOP EQUIPMENT
The configuration consisted of a wooden table 0.8 meters high standing on the Ground Reference
Plane. The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5 meters square
connected to the protective grounding system. A Horizontal Coupling Plane (1.6m x 0.8m) was placed
on the table and attached to the GRP by means of a cable with 940kW total impedance. The equipment
under test, was installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-2, and its
cables were placed on the HCP and isolated by an insulating support of 0.5mm thickness. A distance of
1-meter minimum was provided between the EUT and the walls of the laboratory and any other metallic
structure.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment under test was installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC
61000-4-2, and its cables were isolated from the Ground Reference Plane by an insulating support of
0.1-meter thickness. The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum that is at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5
meters square connected to the protective grounding system and extended at least 0.5 meters from the
EUT on all sides.
Report No.: CE940920L22
42
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.5.6 TEST RESULTS (A)
EUT
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
MODEL
WP54G
MODE
Operating
INPUT POWER
(SYSTEM)
230 Vac, 50 Hz
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
23 deg.C, 50% RH,
986 hPa
TESTED BY
Dark Su
TEST RESULTS OF DIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge
Level (kV)
Polarity
2; 4
Test Point
Contact
Discharge
Air Discharge
Test Result
+/-
4; 6
NOTE 2
NA
PASS
2; 4; 8
+/-
5; 7
NA
NOTE 2
PASS
2; 4; 8
+/-
1-3
NA
NOTE 1
PASS
(+/-)
Description of test point: Please refers to following page for representative mark only.
TEST RESULTS OF INDIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge
Level (kV)
Polarity
2; 4
+/-
(+/-)
Test Point
Horizontal
Coupling
Plane
Vertical
Coupling
Plane
Test Result
4 sides
NOTE 1
NOTE 1
PASS
Description of test point:
2. Rear side
1. Front side
3. Right side
4. Left side
NOTE:
1. There was no change compared with initial operation during and after the test.
2 The connection of the EUT broke off for a while and automatically recovered to the initial
operation during the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
43
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5
3
4
6
7
2
Report No.: CE940920L22
1
44
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.5.7 TEST RESULTS (B)
EUT
MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
Operating
(SYSTEM)
23 deg.C, 49% RH,
TESTED BY
986 hPa
WP54G
230 Vac, 50 Hz
Dark Su
TEST RESULTS OF DIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge
Level (kV)
Polarity
2; 4; 8
Test Point
Contact
Discharge
Air Discharge
Test Result
+/-
1
NA
NOTE 2
PASS
2; 4; 8
+/-
2-3
NA
NOTE 1
PASS
2; 4
+/-
4-5
NOTE 2
NA
PASS
(+/-)
Description of test point: Please refers to following page for representative mark only.
TEST RESULTS OF INDIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge
Level (kV)
Polarity
2; 4
+/-
(+/-)
Test Point
Horizontal
Coupling
Plane
Vertical
Coupling
Plane
Test Result
4 sides
NOTE 1
NOTE 1
PASS
Description of test point:
2. Rear side
1. Front side
3. Right side
4. Left side
NOTE:
1. There was no change compared with initial operation during and after the test.
2 The connection of the EUT broke off for a while and automatically recovered to the initial
operation during the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
45
Report Format Version 2.0.4
3
2
4
5
1
Report No.: CE940920L22
46
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.6 RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD
IMMUNITY TEST (RS)
5.6.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Modulation:
Frequency Step:
Polarity of Antenna:
Test Distance:
Antenna Height:
Dwell Time:
IEC 61000-4-3
80 MHz ~ 1000 MHz
3 V/m
1 kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
1 % of preceding frequency value
Horizontal and Vertical
3m
1.5m
at least 3 seconds
5.6.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
MODEL NO.
Boonton RF Power Meter
4232A-01-02
107402
Nov. 20, 2006
SML03
101499
Nov. 20, 2006
FP 6001
307198
Feb. 21, 2006
ADT_RS_V450
NA
NA
R&S Signal Generator
AR ELECTRIC FIELD SENSOR
Software
SERIAL NO. CALIBRATED UNTIL
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya RS Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
Report No.: CE940920L22
47
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.6.3 TEST PROCEDURE
The test procedure was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-3
a. The testing was performed in a fully-anechoic chamber. The transmit antenna was
located at a distance of 3 meters from the EUT.
b. The frequency range is swept from 80 MHz to 1000 MHz, with the signal 80%
amplitude modulated with a 1kHz sinewave. The rate of sweep did not exceed 1.5
x 10-3 decade/s. Where the frequency range is swept incrementally, the step size
was 1% of preceding frequency value.
c. The dwell time at each frequency shall be not less than the time necessary for the
EUT to be able to respond.
d. The field strength level was 3V/m.
e. The test was performed with the EUT exposed to both vertically and horizontally
polarized fields on each of the four sides.
5.6.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
Report No.: CE940920L22
48
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.6.5 TEST SETUP
3m measurement distance in a Full Anechoic Chamber
EUT
RF Amplifier
RF Generator
and
control system
Monitoring
system
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
NOTE:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-3 was placed on
a non-conductive table 0.8 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the power and
signal wire according to relevant installation instructions.
FLOOR STANDING EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-3 was placed on
a non-conductive wood support 0.1 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the
power and signal wire according to relevant installation instructions.
Report No.: CE940920L22
49
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.6.6 TEST RESULTS (A)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
MODE
Operating
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTAL 23 deg.C, 50% RH,
TESTED BY
CONDITIONS
986 hPa
EUT
WP54G
230 Vac, 50 Hz
Dark Su
Azimuth
Field
Strength
(V/m)
Observation
Test Result
V&H
0
3
NOTE
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
90
3
NOTE
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
180
3
NOTE
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
270
3
NOTE
PASS
Frequency
(MHz)
Polarity
80 ~ 1000
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
5.6.7 TEST RESULTS (B)
EUT
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
MODEL
MODE
Operating
INPUT POWER
230 Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTA 26 deg.C, 62% RH,
L CONDITIONS
990 hPa
WP54G
TESTED BY
JN Chen
Frequency
(MHz)
Polarity
Azimuth
Field
Strength
(V/m)
Observation
Test Result
80 ~ 1000
V&H
0
3
NOTE
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
90
3
NOTE
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
180
3
NOTE
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
270
3
NOTE
PASS
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
50
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.7 ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT/BURST IMMUNITY TEST (EFT)
5.7.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Test Voltage:
IEC 61000-4-4
Power line: 1 kV
Signal line: 0.5 kV
Polarity:
Positive & Negative
Impulse Frequency:
5 kHz
Impulse Waveshape : 5/50 ns
Burst Duration:
15 ms
Burst Period:
300 ms
Test Duration:
Not less than 1 min.
5.7.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
EMC-Partner EFT Generator
EMC-Partner
Capacitive Coupling clamp
EFT Adapter WONORO
Software
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO.
CALIBRATED
UNTIL
TRA2000EFT-C1
623
Nov. 15, 2006
CN-EFT1000
364
NA
WA
EF1Ada-001
NA
EMC-Partner
GENECS
NA
NA
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya EFT Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
5.7.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. Both positive and negative polarity discharges were applied.
b. The length of the “hot wire” from the coaxial output of the EFT generator to the
terminals on the EUT should not exceed 1 meter.
c.
The duration time of each test sequential was 1 minute.
d. The transient/burst waveform was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-4, 5/50ns.
Report No.: CE940920L22
51
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.7.4 TEST SETUP
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Report No.: CE940920L22
52
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.7.5 TEST RESULTS (A)
EUT
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
MODEL
MODE
Operating
INPUT POWER
230 Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
23 deg.C, 50% RH,
985 hPa
TESTED BY
WP54G
Dark Su
Test Point
Polarity
Test Level
(kV)
Observation
Test Result
L1
+/-
1
NOTE
PASS
L2
+/-
1
NOTE
PASS
L1-L2
+/-
1
NOTE
PASS
RJ45 UTP cable
+/-
0.5
NOTE
PASS
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
5.7.6 TEST RESULTS (B)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
MODE
Operating
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTAL 26 deg.C, 62% RH,
TESTED BY
CONDITIONS
990 hPa
EUT
WP54G
230 Vac, 50 Hz
JN Chen
Test Point
Polarity
Test Level
(kV)
Observation
Test Result
RJ45 UTP cable
+/-
0.5
NOTE
PASS
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
53
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.8 SURGE IMMUNITY TEST
5.8.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Wave-Shape:
IEC 61000-4-5
Combination Wave
1.2/50 us Open Circuit Voltage
8 /20 us Short Circuit Current
Test Voltage:
Power line ~ line to line: 0.5; 1 kV
Surge Input/Output:
L1-L2
Generator Source Impedance: 2 ohm between networks
Polarity:
Positive/Negative
Phase Angle:
0° /90°/180°/270°
Pulse Repetition Rate:
1 time / min. (maximum)
Number of Tests:
5 positive and 5 negative at selected points
5.8.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. CALIBRATION UNTIL
EMC-Partner Modular
Impulse Generator
Surge Adapter WONORO
MIG0603IN3
352
Nov. 15, 2006
WA
SU1 Ada-001
NA
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya Surge Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
Report No.: CE940920L22
54
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.8.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. For EUT power supply:
The surge is to be applied to the EUT power supply terminals via the capacitive
coupling network. Decoupling networks are required in order to avoid possible
adverse effects on equipment not under test that may be powered by the same
lines, and to provide sufficient decoupling impedance to the surge wave. The
power cord between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling networks shall be 2
meters in length (or shorter).
b. For test applied to unshielded unsymmetrically operated interconnection lines of
EUT:
The surge is applied to the lines via the capacitive coupling. The coupling /
decoupling networks shall not influence the specified functional conditions of the
EUT. The interconnection line between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling
networks shall be 2 meters in length (or shorter).
c.
For test applied to unshielded symmetrically operated interconnection /
telecommunication lines of EUT:
The surge is applied to the lines via gas arrestors coupling. Test levels below the
ignition point of the coupling arrestor cannot be specified. The interconnection line
between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling networks shall be 2 meters in
length (or shorter).
5.8.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
Report No.: CE940920L22
55
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.8.5 TEST SETUP
Combination
Wave Generator
Coupling &
DecouplingNetwork
AC/DC Power Line (if any)
Signal Line (if any)
EUT
L 2m
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Report No.: CE940920L22
56
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.8.6 TEST RESULTS (A)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
MODE
Operating
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTAL 23 deg.C, 50% RH,
TESTED BY
CONDITIONS
985 hPa
EUT
WP54G
230 Vac, 50 Hz
Dark Su
Observation
Voltage
(kV)
Test Point
Polarity
(+/-)
0°
90°
180°
270°
0.5; 1
L1-L2
+/-
NOTE
NOTE
NOTE
NOTE
Test Result
PASS
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
57
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.9 IMMUNITY TO CONDUCTED DISTURBANCES INDUCED BY RF
FIELDS (CS)
5.9.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Modulation:
Frequency Step:
Coupled Cable:
Coupling Device:
IEC 61000-4-6
0.15 MHz ~ 80 MHz
3 Vr.m.s.
1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
1 % of preceding frequency value
Power Mains, Unshielded
CDN-M2 (2 wires), CDN-T8, EM-Clamp
5.9.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
SERIAL NO.
CALIBRATED
UNTIL
03030
Nov. 04, 2006
03049
Nov. 04, 2006
03050
Nov. 04, 2006
03056
Nov. 04, 2006
03057
Nov. 04, 2006
P/N:FCC-801-T2
03030
Nov. 04, 2006
P/N:FCC-801-T4
03031
Nov. 04, 2006
P/N:FCC-801-T8
03032
Nov. 04, 2006
P/N:F-203I23MM
434
Nov. 04, 2006
4232A-01-02
104302
Nov. 04, 2006
SML 01
ADT_CS_V37
102148
NA
Oct. 25, 2006
NA
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
MODEL NO.
FCC POWER LINE COUPLING
DECOUPLING NETWORK
FCC POWER LINE COUPLING
DECOUPLING NETWORK
FCC POWER LINE COUPLING
DECOUPLING NETWORK
FCC POWER LINE COUPLING
DECOUPLING NETWORK
FCC POWER LINE COUPLING
DECOUPLING NETWORK
FCC SIGNAL LINE POWER LINE
COUPLING DECOUPLING NETWORK
FCC SIGNAL LINE POWER LINE
COUPLING DECOUPLING NETWORK
FCC SIGNAL LINE POWER LINE
COUPLING DECOUPLING NETWORK
M/N:FCC-801M1-25A
M/N:FCC-801M2-25A
M/N:FCC-801M2-25A
M/N:FCC-801M3-25A
M/N:FCC-801M3-25A
EMI Injection Clamp
BOONTON 4232ARF
POWER METER
R&S Signal generator
Software
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya CS Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
Report No.: CE940920L22
58
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.9.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. The EUT shall be tested within its intended operating and climatic conditions.
b. The test shall be performed with the test generator connected to each of the
coupling and decoupling devices in turn, while the other non-excited RF input ports
of the coupling devices are terminated by a 50-ohm load resistor.
c. The frequency range is swept from 150 kHz to 80 MHz, using the signal level
established during the setting process and with a disturbance signal of 80 %
amplitude. The signal is modulated with a 1 kHz sine wave, pausing to adjust the
RF signal level or the switch coupling devices as necessary. The sweep rate shall
not exceed 1.5 x 10-3 decades/s. The step size shall not exceed 1 % of the start
and thereafter 1 % of preceding frequency value where the frequency is swept
incrementally.
d. The dwell time at each frequency shall not be less than the time necessary for the
EUT to be exercised, and able to respond. Sensitive frequencies such as clock
frequency(ies) and harmonics or frequencies of dominant interest, shall be
analyzed separately.
e. Attempts should be made to fully exercise the EUT during testing, and to fully
interrogate all exercise modes selected for susceptibility.
5.9.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
Report No.: CE940920L22
59
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.9.5 TEST SETUP
Ground Reference Plane
Note: 1. The EUT is setup 0.1m above Ground Reference Plane
2. The CDNs and / or EM clamp used for real test depends on ports and cables configuration of
EUT.
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Report No.: CE940920L22
60
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.9.6 TEST RESULTS (A)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
WP54G
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
MODE
230 Vac, 50 Hz
Operating
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTAL 23 deg.C, 50% RH,
TESTED BY
Dark Su
CONDITIONS
986 hPa
EUT
Frequency
Band (MHz)
Applied
Voltage
(Vrms)
Tested Line
Injection
Method
Observation
Test Result
0.15 ~ 80
3
Power line
CDN-M2
NOTE
PASS
0.15 ~ 80
3
RJ45 UTP cable
CDN-T8
NOTE
PASS
NOTE: There is no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
5.9.7 TEST RESULTS (B)
EUT
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
MODEL
MODE
Operating
INPUT POWER
230 Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
23 deg.C, 50% RH,
986 hPa
TESTED BY
WP54G
Dark Su
Frequency
Band (MHz)
Applied
Voltage
(Vrms)
Tested Line
Injection
Method
Observation
Test Result
0.15 ~ 80
3
RJ45 UTP cable
EM-Clamp
NOTE
PASS
NOTE: There is no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
61
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.10 POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD IMMUNITY TEST
5.10.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Observation Time:
Inductance Coil:
IEC 61000-4-8
50Hz
1 A/m
1 minute
Rectangular type, 1mx1m
5.10.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO. CALIBRATED UNTIL
Schaffner Induction Coil Interface
INA2141
6015
NA
Schaffner AC Power Source
NSG1007
55616
Nov. 21, 2006
INA702
111
NA
Shchaffner Win
2120V3
NA
NA
Schaffner INA702 Coil
Software
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya EMS Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
5.10.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. The equipment is configured and connected to satisfy its functional requirements.
b. The power supply, input and output circuits shall be connected to the sources of
power supply, control and signal.
c. The cables supplied or recommended by the equipment manufacturer shall be
used. 1 meter of all cables used shall be exposed to the magnetic field.
5.10.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
Report No.: CE940920L22
62
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.10.5 TEST SETUP
Test
Generator
EUT
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
NOTE:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The equipment shall be subjected to the test magnetic field by using the induction coil of standard
dimension (1 m x 1 m). The induction coil shall then be rotated by 90 degrees in order to expose the
EUT to the test field with different orientations.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment shall be subjected to the test magnetic field by using induction coils of suitable
dimensions. The test shall be repeated by moving and shifting the induction coils, in order to test the
whole volume of the EUT for each orthogonal direction. The test shall be repeated with the coil shifted
to different positions along the side of the EUT, in steps corresponding to 50 % of the shortest side of
the coil. The induction coil shall then be rotated by 90 degrees in order to expose the EUT to the test
field with different orientations.
Report No.: CE940920L22
63
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.10.6 TEST RESULTS (A)
EUT
MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
Operating
(SYSTEM)
23 deg.C, 50% RH,
TESTED BY
986 hPa
WP54G
230 Vac, 50 Hz
Dark Su
Direction
Field Strength
(A/m)
Observation
Test Result
X - Axis
1
NOTE
PASS
Y - Axis
1
NOTE
PASS
Z - Axis
1
NOTE
PASS
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
5.10.7 TEST RESULTS (B)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
INPUT POWER
MODE
Operating
(SYSTEM)
ENVIRONMENTAL 26 deg.C, 62% RH,
TESTED BY
CONDITIONS
990 hPa
EUT
WP54G
230 Vac, 50 Hz
JN Chen
Direction
Field Strength
(A/m)
Observation
Test Result
X - Axis
1
NOTE
PASS
Y - Axis
1
NOTE
PASS
Z - Axis
1
NOTE
PASS
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
64
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.11 VOLTAGE DIP/SHORT INTERRUPTIONS/VOLTAGE
VARIATIONS (DIP) IMMUNITY TEST
5.11.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Test Duration Time:
Interval between Event:
Phase Angle:
Test Cycle:
IEC 61000-4-11
Minimum 3 test events in sequence
Minimum 10 seconds
0°/45°/90°/135°/180°/225°/270°/315°/360°
3 times
5.11.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER
Schaffner AC Power
Source
Schaffner Signal Conditioning
Unit- Lumped Impedance
Software
MODEL NO.
SERIAL NO.
CALIBRATED UNTIL
NSG1007
55616
Nov. 21, 2006
CCN1000-1-LR1
72224
Nov. 21, 2006
Shchaffner Win
2100V3
NA
NA
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in Hwa Ya EMS Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
5.11.3 TEST PROCEDURE
The EUT shall be tested for each selected combination of test levels and duration with
a sequence of three dips/interruptions with intervals of 10 s minimum (between each
test event). Each representative mode of operation shall be tested. Abrupt changes in
supply voltage shall occur at zero crossings of the voltage waveform.
5.11.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation.
Report No.: CE940920L22
65
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.11.5 TEST SETUP
Voltage
Dips
Generator
EUT
AC Power Line
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the
Test Configuration.
Report No.: CE940920L22
66
Report Format Version 2.0.4
5.11.6 TEST RESULTS (A)
NETPASSAGE WP54G WIRELESS-G
MODEL
NETWORK ACCESS POINT
ENVIRONMENTAL 23 deg. C, 50% RH,
INPUT POWER
CONDITIONS
985 hPa
EUT
TESTED BY
Voltage
% Reduction
WP54G
230 Vac, 50 Hz
Dark Su
Ut: 230Vac, 50Hz
Duration
Observation
(Period)
Test Result
>95
0.5
NOTE 1
PASS
30
25
NOTE 1
PASS
>95
250
NOTE 2
PASS
NOTE:
1. There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
2. The connection of the EUT broke off during the test and automatically recovered to the initial
operation after the test.
Report No.: CE940920L22
67
Report Format Version 2.0.4
6 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION
Conducted Emission Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
68
Report Format Version 2.0.4
Conducted Emission Test
(Test results B)
Report No.: CE940920L22
69
Report Format Version 2.0.4
Radiated Emission Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
70
Report Format Version 2.0.4
Radiated Emission Test
(Test results B)
Report No.: CE940920L22
71
Report Format Version 2.0.4
Harmonics Emission Test & Voltage Fluctuation and Flicker Test
(Test results A)
ESD Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
72
Report Format Version 2.0.4
ESD Test
(Test results B)
RS Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
73
Report Format Version 2.0.4
RS Test
(Test results B)
EFT Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
74
Report Format Version 2.0.4
EFT Test
(Test results B)
Surge Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
75
Report Format Version 2.0.4
CS Test (Power line with CDN-M2)
(Test results A)
CS Test (RJ45 UTP cable with CDN-T8)
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
76
Report Format Version 2.0.4
CS Test (RJ45 UTP cable with EM-Clamp)
(Test results B)
Magnetic Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
77
Report Format Version 2.0.4
Magnetic Test
(Test results B)
Voltage Dip and Interruption Test
(Test results A)
Report No.: CE940920L22
78
Report Format Version 2.0.4
7 APPENDIX - INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES
We, ADT Corp., were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio,
Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved by
the following approval agencies according to ISO/IEC 17025:
USA
Germany
Japan
Norway
Canada
R.O.C.
Netherlands
Singapore
Russia
FCC, NVLAP, UL, A2LA
TUV Rheinland
VCCI
NEMKO
INDUSTRY CANADA , CSA
CNLA, BSMI, DGT
Telefication
PSB , GOST-ASIA(MOU)
CERTIS(MOU)
Copies of accreditation certificates of our laboratories obtained from approval
agencies can be downloaded from our web site: www.adt.com.tw/index.5/phtml. If
you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:
Linko EMC/RF Lab
Tel: 886-2-26052180
Fax: 886-2-26052943
Hsin Chu EMC/RF Lab
Tel: 886-3-5935343
Fax: 886-3-5935342
Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety/Telecom Lab
Tel: 886-3-3183232
Fax: 886-3-3185050
Linko RF Lab
Tel: 886-3-3270910
Fax: 886-3-3270892
Email: [email protected]
Web Site: www.adt.com.tw
The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.
Report No.: CE940920L22
79
Report Format Version 2.0.4
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertisement