Juxtacellular Monitoring and Localization of Single Neurons within Sub-

Juxtacellular Monitoring and Localization of Single Neurons within Sub-
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Video Article
Juxtacellular Monitoring and Localization of Single Neurons within Subcortical Brain Structures of Alert, Head-restrained Rats
1
2
1
Jeffrey D. Moore , Martin Deschênes , David Kleinfeld
1
Department of Physics 0374, University of California, San Diego
2
Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Centre de Recherche de l’Université Laval Robert-Giffard
Correspondence to: Jeffrey D. Moore at [email protected]
URL: http://www.jove.com/video/51453
DOI: doi:10.3791/51453
Keywords: Neuroscience, Issue 98, electrophysiology, juxtacellular, iontophoresis, stereotaxic surgery, thalamus, vibrissa
Date Published: 4/27/2015
Citation: Moore, J.D., Deschênes, M., Kleinfeld, D. Juxtacellular Monitoring and Localization of Single Neurons within Sub-cortical Brain Structures
of Alert, Head-restrained Rats. J. Vis. Exp. (98), e51453, doi:10.3791/51453 (2015).
Abstract
There are a variety of techniques to monitor extracellular activity of single neuronal units. However, monitoring this activity from deep brain
structures in behaving animals remains a technical challenge, especially if the structures must be targeted stereotaxically. This protocol
describes convenient surgical and electrophysiological techniques that maintain the animal’s head in the stereotaxic plane and unambiguously
isolate the spiking activity of single neurons. The protocol combines head restraint of alert rodents, juxtacellular monitoring with micropipette
electrodes, and iontophoretic dye injection to identify the neuron location in post-hoc histology. While each of these techniques is in itself wellestablished, the protocol focuses on the specifics of their combined use in a single experiment. These neurophysiological and neuroanatomical
techniques are combined with behavioral monitoring. In the present example, the combined techniques are used to determine how selfgenerated vibrissa movements are encoded in the activity of neurons within the somatosensory thalamus. More generally, it is straightforward
to adapt this protocol to monitor neuronal activity in conjunction with a variety of behavioral tasks in rats, mice, and other animals. Critically, the
combination of these methods allows the experimenter to directly relate anatomically-identified neurophysiological signals to behavior.
Video Link
The video component of this article can be found at http://www.jove.com/video/51453/
Introduction
Monitoring neuronal activity in an alert animal actively engaged in a behavioral task is critical for understanding the function and organization
of the nervous system. Extracellular recording of the electrical activity from single neuronal units has long been a staple tool of systems
neuroscience and is still widely in use at present. A variety of electrode types and configurations are available depending on the scientific and
technical demands of a particular experiment. Chronically implanted microdrives or electrode arrays are often used in freely moving animals,
1-4
including birds, rodents, and non-human primates . Alternatively, acute penetrations with metal or glass microelectrodes via an external
micromanipulator are often used to record from anesthetized or head-restrained animals. Glass micropipette electrodes have the advantage
that they can be used in the juxtacellular or “cell attached” configuration to unambiguously isolate the activity of single neurons without the
5
complications of post-hoc spike sorting . These electrodes further permit recording from anatomically-identified cells or locations, as they
can be used to inject small deposits of dye or neuroanatomical tracers, or even to fill the individual recorded cell. This configuration has been
6-10
successfully applied in rats, mice and birds . The presently described technique focuses on juxtacellular monitoring and extracellular dye
deposits in alert, head-restrained rats. Note that unlike single cell juxtacellular fills, these dye deposits do not provide information about cell
11
morphology or axonal projections , but they enable exact anatomical localization to approximately 50 μm and, critically, have a significantly
higher yield in alert animals. Information regarding single-cell juxtacellular fills is nonetheless provided as an alternative strategy for anatomical
labeling.
In brief, the protocol consists of three major phases. In the first phase, the rat is acclimated to body restraint in a cloth sock (Figure 1) over
a period of 6 days. In the second phase, a head restraint apparatus (Figure 2) and recording chamber are surgically implanted such that
the rat can be maintained in the stereotaxic plane during multiple subsequent recording sessions (Figure 3); this procedure enables the
12
experimenter to target particular sub-cortical regions of the brain for electrophysiological study based on standard reference coordinates .
The third phase involves placing the rat in an appropriate jig for conducting the behavioral and electrophysiological experiments (Figure 4),
constructing the electrode from a quartz capillary tube (Figure 5), making juxtacellular neuronal recordings that unambiguously isolate single
6-9
units , and marking the anatomical location of the recording site with Chicago Sky Blue dye (Figures 6 and 7). The recordings are performed
with simultaneous behavioral monitoring; however, the technical details of the behavior will depend on the scientific goals of each experiment
and are thus beyond the scope of a single protocol. After completion of the experimental procedure, which can be repeated on multiple days,
the animal is euthanized. The brain is extracted and processed according to standard neuroanatomical techniques using either bright field or
fluorescence microscopy.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 1 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Protocol
Experimental protocols were carried out on female Long Evans rats (250 - 350 g) in accordance with federally prescribed animal care and use
guidelines and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California San Diego.
1. Acclimating the Rat to Body Restraint
NOTE: Place the rat on a restricted diet. Feed the rat once per day immediately after each daily handling session to acclimate the rat to the
restraint (described below). Provide enough feed to maintain the animal at 80% of its initial weight. This amount is approximately 6 grams of feed
per day for a 250 g female Long Evans rat.
1. Acclimate the rat to being handled by humans. Gently restrain the rat by hand for periods of approximately 5 sec every 30 sec. Do this for 15
min a day on 2 consecutive days. Monitor the rats daily for signs of stress during the training period. Signs include struggling in response to
restraint, vocalization, and tooth-chattering.
rd
2. On the 3 day, place the rat in a body-constraining cloth sock (Figure 1) for 15 min a day on two consecutive days.
th
3. On the 5 day, place the rat inside the sock, and place the sock inside a rigid tube on the experimental jig (Figure 4). Leave the rat in the
tube for 15 min a day on 2 consecutive days.
th
4. Feed the rat immediately after each training session. At the end of the last session (6 day) give unrestricted access to food. Select for
implantation only those rats which do not show signs of excessive stress on the last training day.
NOTE: Though selection of rats for implantation is subjective, in our hands over 90% of rats were found to be responsive to habituation and
able to undergo implantation.
2. Implanting the Recording Chamber and Head-restraint Mechanism
1. Make a reference wire by soldering bare stainless steel wire to a pin connector. Cut the wire so that 3-5 mm remains uncovered by the pin.
Autoclave the reference wire, along with all surgical tools.
2. Administer ketamine/xylazine anesthesia. Administer 95 mg/kg ketamine mixed with 5 mg/kg xylazine intraperitoneally. The initial dose lasts
for 1½ to 2 hr. Supplement the anesthesia every 30-45 min thereafter, as needed. Lubricate the animal’s eyes with an ophthalmic ointment.
3. Check the toe withdrawal reflex to determine the plane of anesthesia, and maintain anesthesia as necessary.
4. Place the rat in a stereotaxic holding frame with ear bars (Figure 3A). Shave the hair on the head and disinfect the wound site with povidoneiodine (10% solution). Take care to insert the ear bars appropriately so that they do not damage the ear drum. Ear bars with blunt tips are
preferable.
5. Make an incision with a scalpel approximately along the midline of the cranium from the rostro-caudal level of the eyes to the back of the
ears. Use scissors to cut and remove a 2-3 mm strip of skin on either side of the incision.
6. Scrape away the periosteum to expose the surface of the cranium out to the lateral ridges. Cover the exposed cranium with thin layer of
superglue.
7. Drill a small hole, with a slightly smaller diameter than 0-80 screws, using a ½ mm diameter drill burr (see Materials section). Drill the hole
immediately posterior to where the bregma suture meets the lateral ridge, and at a 30-45° angle into the cranium, so that the screw can go in
with the top more lateral than the bottom.
8. Screw in a 0-80 flat-bottom machine screw to the hole (approximately 3 turns), at 30-45° angle. Be careful not to screw in too deeply to avoid
damaging the underlying brain tissue.
9. Repeat this procedure for 6 additional screws in the configuration shown (Figure 3B). Apply superglue to the base of all screws.
10. Place a syringe needle in the stereotax manipulator. Measure from the bregma suture, and make a dent in the cranium with the needle near,
but outside of the desired craniotomy location, as a reference mark.
NOTE: In this demonstration, the stereotaxic coordinates of the mark are 3 mm posterior and 1 mm lateral to the bregma suture.
11. Mark the dent with a permanent marker. Note the stereotaxic coordinates of the mark, as it will serve as a stereotaxic reference point (Figure
3B).
12. Make a craniotomy centered on the desired coordinates (3 mm posterior and 3 mm lateral to bregma in this example). Leave the dura mater
intact. Cover the craniotomy with modified artificial cerebral spinal fluid (125 mM NaCl, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 3.1 mM CaCl2, 1.3
13
mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) (Figure 3C).
13. Cut a 0.2 ml centrifuge tube to 4 - 5 mm in length, and cut off the cap. Place the tube on the cranium and center it over the craniotomy.
14. Apply dental cement around the bottom of the tube to seal the base of the tube to the cranium. Be careful not to leak cement into the exposed
craniotomy (Figure 3D).
15. Drill another small hole (about ½ mm diameter) in the contralateral cranial plate and carefully insert the reference wire. Construct the
reference wire by soldering a pin that interfaces with the recording amplifier to the end of the wire (see Equipment section). Do not move the
reference wire once it is in the brain as this may cause damage.
16. Apply superglue to the hole in which the wire was inserted. This will seal the pin and wire in place temporarily.
17. Mix the two parts of the silicone gel kit (see Materials section) in approximately equal portions. Wait two minutes for mixing and fill the
centrifuge tube approximately ⅓ full with gel.
18. Attach a right angle post clamp (see Materials section) to the head restraint bar. Attach the head plate (Figure 2A) to the holding bar (Figure
2B) at a 45° pitch angle so that the bottom of the plate is toward the nose of the animal. It is helpful to use an inclinometer to set the pitch
angle to match that of the experimental jig (Figure 4).
19. Attach the holding bar to the stereotax manipulator arm so that the bar is parallel to the ear bars. Lower the bar and plate so that the plate is
posterior of the lambda suture and anterior to the caudal-most screw.
20. Grasp the front head-bolt (an 8-32 stud or screw, see Materials section) at approximately 45° angle with a helping hands arm and clamp, so
that the head of the screw faces down and towards the tail of the animal. Lower the screw so that it touches the anterior 0-80 screws (Figure
3F, G).
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 2 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
21. Secure the bolt and plate in place with dental acrylic. Apply dental acrylic around the bone screw heads, reference pin, and around the sides
of the centrifuge tube. Wait approximately 10 min for the dental acrylic to dry (Figure 3H).
22. Apply a layer of dental cement around the edges of the dental acrylic, cementing the skin to the implant. Wait for the cement to dry.
23. Poke several holes in the cap of the centrifuge tube, and place the cap on the tube.
24. Remove the helping hands clamp. Then carefully remove the head-holding bar from the stereotax, and then remove head plate from the bar
(Figure 3I).
25. Remove the animal from the stereotax and administer post-operative care and monitoring in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations,
and laws (e.g., Buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg, every 8-12 hr for a minimum of 24 hr). If inflammation develops around the edges of the implant,
apply a thin layer of antibiotic ointment to the affected site daily until resolved.
3. Juxtacellular Monitoring of Neuronal Units
1. Pull quartz capillary tubing on a carbon dioxide laser micropipette puller (see Equipment section) with tip diameters of less than 1 μm
(Figure 5A).
NOTE: the heating parameters will vary according to the particular instrument, and that the required neck diameter will vary depending on the
brain structure of interest. For recordings in rat thalamus, micropipettes have necks ranging from 5-7 mm.
2. Secure the pipette in place under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope equipped with long working distance objectives. Use
modeling clay to hold the pipette in place on the microscope’s stage.
3. Slowly move a glass block (0.5 - 1 cm thick; a piece of glass used for making ultra-microtome knives is convenient) into the field of view with
the pipette tip. Using the stage micromanipulator, gently touch the pipette tip to the glass, causing it to break. Repeat as necessary until the
pipette tip outer diameter is between 1-3 μm (Figure 5B,C). Ensure that these micropipettes have impedances between approximately 5-15
MΩ.
8
4. Prepare extracellular saline (135 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.2 with NaOH) and add 2% (w/
v) Chicago Sky Blue. Using a syringe with a 30 G needle or smaller, fill the back end of the pipette with the solution. Alternatively, for single
cell juxtacellular labeling add 2% (w/v) Neurobiotin or biotinylated dextran amine (BDA-3000 or BDA-10000) to the saline solution in place of
Chicago Sky Blue.
5. Place the rat inside the cloth sock inside the rigid tube on an appropriate experimental jig (Figure 4).Wait a minimum of 72 hr after surgery
before placing the animal on the head-restraint jig. Tighten the drawstring around the upper sternum, rather than the neck, to avoid
obstruction of the airway. If breathing appears to be labored or obstructed, loosen the drawstring or move it posteriorly. Carry out this
procedure while the rat is alert.
6. Attach the head-restraining plate on the rat to the corresponding piece on the jig. To do this, first pin the head-restraint plate in place, and
then secure it using a 4-40 screw. Be sure to wait until the animal is calm in order to avoid applying excessive torque to the head. Next, place
an 8-32 nut on the head-restraining bolt that is implanted on the rat. Then screw in a threaded stainless-steel rod to the head-bolt. Affix the
rod to the experimental jig in such a way that it can be tightened in place (Figure 4).
NOTE: Securing the animal with head-bolt as well as the head-restraint plate minimizes bending of the apparatus and improves recording
stability. In most cases recording can commence on the first day the animal is head-restrained. However, if the animal fidgets excessively or
vocalizes, provide one day of head-restraint habituation training before commencing any recordings. In this case, leave the animal on the jig
for 15 min and then place it back in its cage. Repeat this step the following day and continue with the protocol.
7. Open the recording chamber and remove the silicone gel. Clean the craniotomy using fine forceps if tissue has re-grown in the craniotomy.
8. Attach the pipette to the motorized micromanipulator, and plug in the headstage pre-amplifier.
NOTE: In the present demonstration, a small relay circuit on the headstage is used to switch between the amplifier lead wires and an external
current source with high compliance (Figure 6A-C). Note that some amplifiers have an appropriate built-in high compliance source (see
Discussion and Materials sections).
9. Use the motorized micromanipulator to move the tip of the pipette to the stereotaxically identified mark in the recording chamber. Note the
coordinates of this location. Be careful not to break the tip of the pipette on the cranium.
10. Move the pipette to the desired recording location in the anterior-posterior and medio-lateral axes. Then advance the pipette ventrally through
the dura until it is approximately 500 μm dorsal to the intended recording location.
11. Slowly advance the pipette while listening for spiking events on an audio monitor of the amplified voltage recorded between the pipette tip
and the reference wire. Once spiking events are identified, continue to move the pipette 0-100 μm until positive going voltage deflections
greater than approximately 500 μV are observed.
NOTE: The electrode resistance will increase by a factor of approximately 1.5-10 when this occurs.
12. Begin recording once a unit has been isolated as according to step 3.11, along with all other behavioral and physiological measures of
interest. In the present demonstration, self-generated vibrissa movements are monitored with high speed videography (see Materials
section).
13. To label the recording site, switch the electrode leads to connect to the current source. There are several ways to do this, using either a relay
circuit (Figure 6A-C), a built-in current source on the amplifier, or manually (Figure 6D, see step 3.8 and Discussion). Pass -4 μA with 2 sec
pulses at 50% duty cycle for 4 min to iontophoretically inject Chicago Sky Blue through the pipette.
14. Kill and perfuse the animal after several labeling procedures according to standard practice. Section the brain and counterstain as necessary
14
to identify the anatomical location of the recording site. Counterstain the tissue for cytochrome oxidase reactivity as per . Alternatively,
identify the Chicago Sky Blue deposits using fluorescence microscopy.
NOTE: To accurately differentiate between different labeled units it is important that all labels are made with the same pipette on the same
day, without unclamping the pipette between labels. In this case recording sites can be differentiated by their relative locations in post-hoc
histology along with the noted manipulator coordinates of each site (see step 3.9). For unambiguous identification, mark the labels at least
200 μm apart from one another, and no more than 3-5 labels per brain region.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 3 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Representative Results
15,16
Neuronal units in ventral posterior medial (VPM) thalamus encode the phase of vibrissa movement during self-generated whisking
. Figure
7A shows sample spiking activity of a VPM thalamic unit as a rat is actively whisking. Figure 7B shows a histogram of spike times aligned to
17
the instantaneous phase of vibrissa motion . There are more spikes during the retraction phase of whisking. After the recording, the location
of the unit was labeled via iontophoresis of Chicago sky blue dye, as shown in Figure 7C. The tissue is counterstained for cytochrome oxidase
activity to reveal the neuroanatomical borders of VPM thalamus. A similar version of this protocol was recently applied to monitor whisking18
related multiunit neuronal activity (10-20 μm diameter pipette tips) in specific brainstem nuclei .
Figure 1: Cloth restraining sock. (A) Photograph of a rat sock with drawstrings and drawstring clasps. The small end is placed snugly around
the sternum, and the large end around the tail. (B) Design pattern for the sock in panel 1A. Dimensions are in inches.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 4 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Figure 2: Mechanical design of head restraint apparatus. (A) Mechanical design of a precision head restraint plate for rats. Dimensions are in
inches. (B) Mechanical design of a head restraint bar for use with the plate in panel 2A. The protocol requires two of these parts, mounted using
right-angle post clamps at the same pitch angle. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 5 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Figure 3: Surgical procedure. (A) Rat in a stereotaxic holding frame (protocol step 2.4). (B) Surgical site with implanted screws and cranial
markings (protocol step 2.10). (C) Surgical site with a craniotomy (protocol step 2.12). (D) Surgical site with the recording chamber (protocol step
2.14). (E) Surgical site with the reference wire and silicone gel (protocol step 2.17). (F, G) Surgical site with head restraint plate and bar held in
place (protocol step 2.20). (H) Surgical site in with plate and bar cemented in place (protocol step 2.21). (I) Final head-restraint and recording
chamber implant (protocol step 2.24). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 6 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Figure 4: Experimental jig. Diagram of rat in the mechanical jig for electrophysiological and behavioral monitoring experiments (protocol steps
3.5-3.6). The jig utilizes the bar and plate in Figure 2.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 7 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Figure 5: Micropipette electrode construction. (A) Micrograph of an unbroken micropipette (protocol step 3.1). Scale bar is as in panel C. (B)
Micrograph of the unbroken micropipette and glass block under microscope (protocol step 3.2). The reflection of the tip can be seen in the glass.
Scale bar is as in panel C. (C) Micrograph of the broken micropipette (protocol step 3.3). (D) Micrograph of the tip of the unbroken micropipette
in the boxed region of panel A. Scale bar is as in panel E. (E) Micrograph of the tip of the broken micropipette in the boxed region of panel C.
Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 8 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Figure 6: Equipment for switching between the amplifier and current source. (A) Setup to switch the leads from the amplifier to the current
source via a magnetic relay (optional). A printed circuit board containing the voltage-controlled relay switch is attached to the amplifier head
stage. (B) Layout for the printed circuit board in panel 6A. The board connects the amplifier leads and current source leads to the input pins of
the relay, and the electrode leads to the output pins. The electrode is connected to either the current source or the amplifier by applying either
0 or 5 V to the relay control pins. Bottom view. Dimensions are in inches. (C) Top view of the board layout in panel 6B. (D) Setup to switch the
leads from the amplifier to the current source manually (optional) requires an open pipette holder and flexible lead wire like the ones shown (see
also: Equipment section). This approach is an alternative to the relay circuit in panels 6A-C. Please click here to view a larger version of this
figure.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 9 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Figure 7: Experimental setup and representative results. (A) Spikes and vibrissa movement from one unit (protocol step 3.12). (B1)
Normalized vibrissa position versus phase in the whisk cycle. Each whisk is normalized such that the most caudal position during the whisk is
defined as zero and the most rostral position defined as one. The trajectory represents the normalized position versus instantaneous phase in
17
the whisk cycle . All identified whisks are superimposed. (B2) Raster of the phase in the whisk cycle at which spikes occur. Each trial on the
vertical axis represents a single whisk. (B3) Histogram of spike rates with respect whisk cycle phase for the same unit. (C1) Location of Chicago
Sky Blue dye with cytochrome oxidase counterstaining (protocol steps 3.13-3.14). (C2) High resolution view of the outlined region in panel C1.
The arrowhead points to the dye label. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Discussion
Construction of the experimental jig
The description of the mechanical parts used to build the experimental jig (Figure 4) is omitted from the protocol, as it can be constructed in
a variety of ways. In this demonstration standard opto-mechanical parts and support clamps are used to mount the head restraint bar and
the body restraint tube (see Materials section). Similar opto-mechanical parts can be used to mount the electrode holder to the motorized
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 10 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
micromanipulator. It is important that the head restraint bar on the jig is mounted at the same pitch angle as the bar used to implant the headrestraint plate during surgery. If the electrode is to be moved along the standard stereotaxic axes, then the x-axis of the electrode should move
parallel to the head-restraint bar, and the z-axis perpendicular to plane containing lambda and bregma and parallel to the ground (Figure 4).
Types of appropriate amplifiers and current sources
There are a variety of commercial amplifiers and current sources that can be used for this experiment. Most extracellular and intracellular
electrophysiology amplifiers with a current clamp mode that achieve a total gain of 1,000X are appropriate. For iontophoresis of Chicago Sky
Blue with 1-3 μm pipettes, a current source that can deliver up to 10 μA with a resolution of at least 1 μA and a compliance of at least 100 V
is recommended. Note that some commercial amplifiers have appropriate built-in current sources (see alternate parts in Materials section).
However, to circumvent the requirement of an appropriate combined amplifier/current source, a magnetic relay circuit can be attached to the
front end of the amplifier headstage (Figure 6A-C). Such a circuit is optional but it allows the experimenter to switch between the amplifier and
a separate current source to deliver iontophoresis pulses without physically perturbing the electrode. An alternative approach is to manually
replace the electrode lead wires with ones that connect to the current source. In this case, it is best to use a pipette holder which does not
enclose the top (unbroken end) of the pipette, and to use flexible lead wire (Figure 6D).
Steps that may require repeated practice
There are several steps that may require practice to master. The step that requires the most dexterity is breaking the tip of the pipette. It is helpful
to paint the edge of the glass block to visualize the reflection of the tip in the glass. Then one can slowly advance the block and the pipette
until the tip barely meets its reflection. Advancing pipette or block too fast can shatter the micropipette and make the tip diameter too large or
uneven. We recommend using micropipettes made of quartz, as described in the protocol. Quarts micropipettes effectively penetrate intact rat
dura in chronically prepared craniotomies without bending or breaking. This eliminates the need for dura resection, which can cause additional
complications. Borosilicate micropipettes with short tapers (<5 mm) also penetrate the dura, but their use is limited to recording from superficial
structures like the cerebral cortex or striatum. Recording from deeper structures, particularly in thalamus or brainstem, requires long tapered,
preferably quartz micropipettes. A second step that requires practice is positioning the pipette in the juxtacellular configuration. Moving the
pipette too quickly when close to a cell can rupture the membrane. Therefore, it is helpful to monitor the resistance of the pipette to know when
the tip is close to a putative cell. Changes in membrane resistance of at least 2-fold indicate that the electrode may be near or touching a cell
membrane.
Common pitfalls
There are several common pitfalls to bear in mind. First, because the pipette tip is necessarily very close to the cell, it is possible to “lose” the cell
if the pipette drifts away from the membrane. It is also possible for a cell to become agitated or rupture midway through the recording. If it does,
the spike width and firing rate may increase and the spike amplitude may decrease. These are indications that the cell may be unhealthy. Animal
movement will inevitably cause these events to happen on some proportion of the recordings, but can be minimized by having the animal well
habituated and by avoiding making unnecessary, sudden loud noises or causing vibrations that startle the animal.
Potential modifications to the protocol
It is possible to use this recording and labeling technique in contexts in which the animal is performing a variety of behavioral tasks. Training for
a particular behavioral task can be carried out following surgery but before beginning to record. Neuronal activity can be recorded at least 1-2
weeks after preparing the craniotomy, and iontophoretic spots can last for at least 2-3 days. This time frame permits a variety of experimental
manipulations, including recording from multiple brain regions during separate recording sessions.
The technique may also be modified to fill the individual neurons from which the recordings are made. This alternative strategy of juxtacellular
labeling of single neurons requires mechanical stability that is only achieved when the animal is still or anesthetized. For this labeling strategy,
the use of BDA is recommended over Neurobiotin. BDA is not degraded by proteases, which significantly increases the rate of success over
Neurobiotin. Labeling should be attempted during the last recording session before perfusing the animal. Note that detailed descriptions of the
6,19
8
juxtacellular protocol have been described previously
.While the technique has been employed successfully in alert rats , in our experience
iontophoretic injection of Chicago Sky Blue has a substantially higher yield. Note that both Chicago Sky Blue and Neurobiotin or BDA labeling
can be done in the same animal.
This technique is likely to be appropriate for a variety of species. Note that juxtacellular recordings have been made in cortical regions of alert
9
mice , for example. While training, handling, and head-restraint are species specific, the particular techniques for monitoring and labeling
described in this protocol should remain the same. Finally, simply by changing the size of the pipette tip and parameters of the current pulses this
20,21
technique may be used for iontophoretic injection of a variety of molecules, including pharmacological agents
. Thus, the technique could also
be useful for neuropharmacological studies which involve behaving animals.
Conclusions
22
It is often the case that brain regions which are extremely close together can have markedly different properties and/or functions . In such
cases, relating the activity of single neurons from anatomically defined regions to organismal behavior is critical for understanding neural circuits
and computation. The present article demonstrates a protocol to accomplish this using a combination of standard techniques and describes
sensory encoding in VPM thalamic neurons as an example. The technique is likely to be relevant and feasible in a variety of brain regions
and behavioral paradigms in different animal models. It has a substantially higher success rate than single cell juxtacellular labeling in alert
6,8
animals , and has the advantage of better anatomical resolution over techniques that utilize multi-electrode arrays or microdrives.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 11 of 12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
www.jove.com
Disclosures
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant MT-5877), the National Institutes of Health (grants NS058668 and
NS066664), and the US-Israeli Binational Foundation (grant 2003222) for funding these studies.
References
1. Fee, M. S., & Leonardo, A. Miniature motorized microdrive and commutator system for chronic neural recording in small animals. Journal of
Neuroscience Methods. 112(2), 83-94 (2001).
2. Ventakachalam, S., Fee, M. S., & Kleinfeld, D. Ultra-miniature headstage with 6-channel drive and vacuum-assisted micro-wire implantation
for chronic recording from neocortex. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 90(1), 37-46 (1999).
3. Szuts, T. A. et al. A wireless multi-channel neural amplifier for freely moving animals. Nature Neuroscience. 14(2), 263-269 (2011).
4. Roy, S., & Wang, X. Wireless multi-channel single unit recording in freely moving and vocalizing primates. Journal of neuroscience methods.
203(1), 28-40 (2012).
5. Hill, D. N., Mehta, S. B., & Kleinfeld, D. Quality metrics to accompany spike sorting of extracellular signals. Journal of Neuroscience. 31(24),
8699–8705 (2011).
6. Pinault, D. A novel single-cell staining procedure performed in vivo under electrophysiological control: morpho-functional features of
juxtacellularly labeled thalamic cells and other central neurons with biocytin or Neurobiotin. Journal of neuroscience methods. 65(2), 113-136
(1996).
7. Person, A. L., & Perkel, D. J. Pallidal neuron activity increases during sensory relay through thalamus in a songbird circuit essential for
learning. The Journal of neuroscience. 27(32), 8687-8698 (2007).
8. Kock, C. P., & Sakmann, B. Spiking in primary somatosensory cortex during natural whisking in awake head-restrained rats is cell-type
specific. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 106(38), 16446-16450 (2009).
9. Connor, D. H., Peron, S. P., Huber, D., & Svoboda, K. Neural activity in barrel cortex underlying vibrissa-based object localization in mice.
Neuron. 67(6), 10481061 (2010).
10. Hellon, R. The marking of electrode tip positions in nervous tissue. The Journal of physiology. 214, 12P (1971).
11. Furuta, T., Deschênes, M., & Kaneko, T. Anisotropic distribution of thalamocortical boutons in barrels. The Journal of Neuroscience. 31(17),
6432-6439 (2011).
12. Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Academic Press, (1986).
13. Kleinfeld, D., & Delaney, K. R. Distributed representation of vibrissa movement in the upper layers of somatosensory cortex revealed with
voltage sensitive dyes. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 375(1), 89-108 (1996).
14. Wong-Riley, M. Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase
histochemistry. Brain research. 171(1), 11-28 (1979).
15. Moore, J. D., Deschênes, M., & Kleinfeld, D. Self-generated vibrissa motion and touch are differentially represented throughout ventral
posterior medial thalamus in awake, head-fixed rats. In Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting. 41 496.08/TT424 Society for
Neuroscience, (2011).
16. Khatri, V., Bermejo, R., Brumberg, J. C., & Zeigler, H. P. Whisking in air: Encoding of kinematics by VPM neurons in awake rats.
Somatosensory and Motor Research. 27(3), 11-20 (2010).
17. Hill, D. N., Curtis, J. C., Moore, J. D., & Kleinfeld, D. Primary motor cortex reports efferent control of vibrissa position on multiple time scales.
Neuron. 72(2), 344–356 (2011).
18. Moore, J. D. et al. Hierarchy of orofacial rhythms revealed through whisking and breathing. Nature 497(7448), 205-210 (2013).
19. Duque, A., & Zaborszky, L. in Neuroanatomical Tract-Tracing 3. 197-236 Springer, (2006).
20. Neuroactive substances: Neuropharmacology by microiontophoresis. (Kation Scientific), http://kationscientific.com/fsubstances.html (2015).
21. Dyes and Tracers: Sitemarking and tracktracing by microiontophoresis. (Kation Scientific), http://kationscientific.com/fdyes.html (2015).
22. Urbain, N., & Deschênes, M. A new thalamic pathway of vibrissal information modulated by the motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience.
27(45), 12407-12412 (2007).
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Visualized Experiments
April 2015 | 98 | e51453 | Page 12 of 12
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertisement