kiefhaber 2010

kiefhaber 2010
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Heidelberg
Diploma thesis
in Physics
submitted by
Daniel Kiefhaber
born in Kaiserslautern
2010
Development of a Reflective Stereo Slope Gauge for the
Measurement of Ocean Surface Wave Slope Statistics
This diploma thesis has been carried out by Daniel Kiefhaber
at the
Institute of Environmental Physics
under the supervision of
Prof. Dr. Bernd Jähne
and
Prof. Dr. Ulrich Platt
Abstract
An optical instrument for the measurement of surface ocean wave statistics has been developed and is presented in this thesis. Based on the reflective stereo slope gauge (RSSG)
principle, it can simultaneously measure wave slope and height statistics. The instrument
comprises a stereo camera setup and two light sources built from infrared LEDs (940 nm).
Slope statistics are derived from the statistical distribution of the positions of specular reflections in images of the water surface. The parallax of the reflections in the stereo images
gives the distance of the camera to the water surface which can be used to infer wave height
statistics. A laboratory version of the instrument has been built, calibrated and tested in
experiments at the Aeolotron wind wave facility. Two-dimensional slope probability distributions for slopes in the range of −0.05 < sx,y < 0.05 were obtained for a range of wind
speeds and clean water as well as surface slick conditions. The mean square slope of the
surface was derived and compared to data from simultaneous reference measurements. The
two data sets are found to agree well for lower wind speeds, at higher wind speeds significant deviations occur. The causes for these deviations have been identified and taken
into account in designing the instrument for field measurements. This ocean version of the
instrument is ready to accompany heat exchange measurements aboard a research vessel in
the Baltic Sea in June 2010.
Zusammenfassung
Ein optisches Instrument zur Messung von Wellenstatistiken von Ozean-Oberflächenwellen
wurde entwickelt und wird in dieser Arbeit präsentiert. Es basiert auf dem reflective
stereo slope gauge (RSSG) Prinzip und kann gleichzeitig die Statistik von Wellenneigungen und Wellenhöhen messen. Das Instrument umfasst ein Stereo-Kamera-System und
zwei Lichtquellen, die aus Infrarot-LEDs (940 nm) aufgebaut sind. Neigungsstatistiken werden aus der statistischen Verteilung der Positionen von spiegelnden Reflexen in Bildern
der Wasseroberfläche gewonnen. Die Parallaxe der Reflexe in den Stereo-Bildern ergibt
die Entfernung der Kamera zur Wasseroberfläche, aus welcher auf Wellenhöhenstatistiken zurückgeschlossen werden kann. Eine Laborversion des Instruments wurde aufgebaut, kalibriert und in Experimenten am Aeolotron Wind-Wellen-Kanal getestet. Zweidimensionale Neigungsverteilungen wurden sowohl für sauberes Wasser, als auch unter
Oberflächenfilm-Bedingungen für verschiedene Windgeschwindigkeiten in einem Neigungsbereich −0.05 < sx,y < 0.05 bestimmt. Die mittlere quadratische Neigung der Oberfläche
wurde aus den Verteilungen abgeleitet und mit Daten aus simultanen Referenzmessungen verglichen. Die beiden Datensätze stimmen bei niedrigen Windgeschwindigkeiten gut
überein, bei höheren Windgeschwindigkeiten treten signifikante Abweichungen auf. Die
Gründe für diese Abweichungen wurden identifiziert und im Design des Instruments für
Feldmessungen berücksichtigt. Diese Ozeanversion des Instruments steht bereit um im Juni
2010 Wärmeaustauschmessungen an Bord eines Forschungsschiffs in der Ostsee zu begleiten.
Contents
1 Introduction
1
2 Theory
5
2.1
Fluid Mechanics Basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
2.1.1
Reference Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
2.1.2
Navier-Stokes Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
2.1.3
Potential Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
2.1.4
Bernoulli Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
Water Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
2.2.1
Small Amplitude Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
2.2.2
Description of the Wave Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
Surface Slope Probability Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
2.3.1
Gram-Charlier Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13
2.3.2
Bound Wave Model
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
2.3.3
Non-Gaussian Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
Reflections at the Water Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
2.4.1
The Fresnel Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
2.4.2
Reflection and Refraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
2.4.3
Upwelling Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18
2.2
2.3
2.4
3 Method
3.1
3.2
3.3
21
Historical Review of Measurement Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21
3.1.1
Optical Measurement Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21
3.1.2
Stereo Imaging of Water Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
Slope Measurement Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28
3.2.1
The Geometry of Reflection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28
3.2.2
Reference Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
3.2.3
Transformations Between the Reference Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
3.2.4
Ray Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32
Height Measurement Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34
3.3.1
Distance from Stereo Triangulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34
3.3.2
Dependence of Parallax on Object Distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
III
4 Setup and Simulation
4.1
4.2
4.3
Experimental Setup
41
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41
4.1.1
Setup of the Stereo Camera System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41
4.1.2
The Aeolotron Wind Wave Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
Image Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
4.2.1
Consistency Check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
4.2.2
Curvature Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
Calibration of the RSSG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53
4.3.1
Illumination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53
4.3.2
LED Intensity Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
55
4.3.3
Stereo Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56
5 Data Evaluation
59
5.1
Preprocessing During Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59
5.2
Slope Statistics Reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
61
5.2.1
Finite-sized Light Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
61
5.2.2
Probability Distribution of Small Slopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62
5.2.3
Extraction of the Mean Square Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
5.2.4
Implementation of the image processing algorithm . . . . . . . . . . .
67
Wave Height Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
68
5.3.1
Parallax Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
68
5.3.2
Implementation of the Image Processing Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . .
70
5.3
6 Results
71
6.1
Sample Images . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71
6.2
Mean Square Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71
6.3
The Effect of Surfactants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
72
6.4
Slope Probability Density Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
75
6.5
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79
7 Conclusion and Outlook
83
7.1
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
83
7.2
Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
84
Bibliography
85
1 Introduction
More than two thirds of the surface of the Earth are covered with bodies of water. They play
a prominent role in the global climate system, e.g. by solving and storing huge amounts of
greenhouse gases, like CO2 . The fraction of fossil fuel CO2 that is taken up by the oceans is
estimated to be 30-40 % (Donelan and Wanninkhof, 2002; Sabine et al., 2004). Over longer,
millenial timescales, the oceans are expected to eventually dissolve about 85 % of the anthropogenic CO2 released into the atmosphere (Field and Raupach, 2004). Global climate
models which are important tools to make predictions about future climate development need
to account for this. Thus it is necessary to know how the greenhouse gases that are added
to the atmosphere by burning of fossil fuel are dissolved in the oceans and which factors the
transport rates depend on.
Although the oceans are a net sink for CO2 in the global carbon cycle, figure 1.1 indicates
that the situation is more complex. CO2 transport between atmosphere and oceans is not
unidirectional and shows high spatial variability on global scales. The situation becomes even
more complicated when transfer is investigated on much smaller scales. The gas flux depends
on many factors, such as concentration gradients, wind, air and sea temperature, surfactant
coverage etc. Figure 1.2 illustrates the variety of interactions between the atmosphere and
the oceans. Most of them are interconnected and many contribute to some extent to air-sea
gas exchange rates (Wanninkhof et al., 2009).
The “bottleneck” for the transport of trace gases like CO2 , but also for heat, from the atmosphere to the ocean is the interface between air and sea. While the near surface atmosphere
is well mixed by wind-induced turbulence, the turbulence cannot cross the gas-liquid phase
boundary (Jähne, 1985). In the so-called aqueous boundary layer which has a thickness of
20 to 2000 micrometers, transport can only occur by the relatively slow molecular diffusion
(Jähne, 2010). The exact processes that determine the rates of gas and heat transfer at the
air-sea boundary are a topic of ongoing research. It is, however, well established that gas
exchange rates are heavily dependent on surface roughness – constituted by waves (Jähne
et al., 1987).
The ocean surface is practically never completely calm and flat. Even in the absence of
wind – the generating and driving force behind most waves – one can usually observe a long
wavelength swell, possibly coming from storms thousands of kilometers away. A remarkable
feature of ocean waves is the huge spectrum of wavelengths that occur (see figure 1.3). From
small so-called capillary waves with wavelengths of millimeters to centimeters, to the short
1
1 Introduction
Figure 1.1: The oceans as a sink for CO2 : The map shows the spatial distribution of the mean
annual net flux of CO2 between the atmosphere and the ocean (year 2000). It is based
on 3 million surface water measurements of CO2 concentration. The resulting net global
air-sea flux is 1.42 · 1012 kg of Carbon per year. (Taken from Takahashi et al. (2009).)
Figure 1.2: Interactions between the lower atmosphere and the upper oceans. Source: SOLAS International Project Office (http://www.solas-int.org/resources/downloads.html).
2
Figure 1.3: Schematic represenation of the energy contained in the surface waves of the oceans. The
red box indicates the part of the spectrum this work is concerned with. Redrawn and
modified after Kinsman (1965).
gravity waves that appear shortly after the onset of wind, with wavelengths in the order
of decimeters to meters, to long swell with wavelengths of tens and hundreds of meters.
The spectrum is extended even further if tides and tsunamis are included. The latter are
generated not by wind but by submarine earthquakes and can practically not be observed on
the open ocean, because their wavelengths are in the order of hundreds of kilometers while
their amplitudes are mere centimeters.
While tsunamis and longer gravity waves may be dominant in the public perception of ocean
waves, they are not as relevant to gas exchange. Two effects contribute to the enhancement of
gas exchange: First, the total surface area is increased in the presence of waves, and second,
breaking waves create turbulence and bring water from deeper layers to the surface. The
increase in surface area is only 5 % for a relatively rough surface with a mean square slope
of 0.1 (Cox and Munk, 1956). Turbulence induced by breaking waves is far more important
and can triple gas transfer rates (Jähne et al., 1979). Not all breaking waves are producing
spectacular whitecaps. Short waves can introduce turbulence in the boundary layer by socalled microscale wave breaking (Banner and Phillips, 1974). Since diffusion through the
boundary layer is very slow, turbulence that renews the surface with fresh and unsaturated
water from below strongly accelerates gas exchange (Zappa et al., 2001).
The wave field in the open ocean is not fully described by the local wind speed. For example, it can be significantly altered in the presence of surfactants. These surfactants may be
anthropogenic, e.g. oil, but can just as well be biological, e.g. produced by phytoplankton.
Surfactants effectively dampen capillary and short gravity waves and thus reduce the overall
effect of wind stress on the water surface significantly. What is striking is that a mono molec-
3
1 Introduction
ular layer of a surfactant can be sufficient to produce observable effects (Hühnerfuss et al.,
1987; Jähne et al., 1987).
Gas exchange experiments are conducted both on the open ocean and in laboratory facilities.
Laboratory facilities allow experiments to investigate dependencies on single environmental
parameters that can be controlled in a closed facility (Jähne, 1980). On the other hand,
since it is not trivial to scale all oceanic processes to laboratory size, field experiments are
indispensable.
The goal of this work is the development of an improved measurement instrument to measure
certain properties of surface waves in the field, i.e. on the open ocean. This instrument,
the Reflective Stereo Slope Gauge (RSSG), will be installed on research vessels and able
to measure statistics of the height and slope distribution of waves. In earlier realizations
of the measurement principle, Waas and Jähne (1992) and Dieter (1998) showed that the
RSSG can successfully measure wave height and slope statistics in the field. However, the
technological development of the time limited the performance of the instrument. The new
RSSG can measure partial slope probability distributions and derive slope and height statistics
with unprecedented resolution. Statistical parameters that can be determined include the
mean square slope, the variance of the slope probability distribution, which can be used to
parameterize the influence of surface roughness on gas transfer rates (Jähne et al., 1987).
4
2 Theory
2.1 Fluid Mechanics Basics
2.1.1 Reference Frames
In fluid mechanics, two reference frames are commonly used and have been given special
names. A Eulerian reference frame is at rest (with respect to the earth) and the velocity of
the fluid is described by the vector field u(x, t). In this specification, the rate of change of a
given property1
D
∂
∂ ∂xj
∂
∂
∂
≡
+
=
+ uj
=
+ u · ∇,
Dt
∂t ∂xj ∂t
∂t
∂xj
∂t
(2.1)
where the last conversion is only valid in Cartesian coordinates.
The total rate of change is composed of the local rate of change
change u · ∇. The material derivative operator
is fully equivalent to the
d
dt
D
Dt
∂
∂t
and the advective rate of
which is popularly used in fluid mechanics
operator from elementary calculus. It is used to highlight the
physical interpretation of local and advective change.
A Lagrangian reference frame is not at rest, but moving with the fluid’s velocity u. Here, the
material derivative reduces to the (partial) time derivative
D
∂
≡
,
Dt
∂t
(2.2)
since the velocity of the fluid relative to the reference frame is zero and there cannot be
advection.
In laboratory studies of fluid mechanics, instruments are usually fixed to, say, wind-wave
facilities, and thus measure fluid properties in a Eulerian reference frame. In open ocean
experiments, drifting buoys can be deployed to follow the mean water flow and thus measure
in a Lagrangian reference frame, while ship-borne measurements can also be conducted from
a Eulerian frame, since GPS-based navigation permits holding a position accurately.
1
Einstein’s tensor summation convention notation is used.
5
2 Theory
2.1.2 Navier-Stokes Equation
Newton’s second axiom – or law of motion – states that any force applied to a body produces
a proportional acceleration, the constant of proportionality being the mass m. This law can
be applied not only to point-like bodies, but also to a continuum, such as a body of water.
There are four forces acting on water in the ocean, arising from pressure, gravitation, the
Coriolis effect (i.e. the Earth’s rotation), and friction. The acceleration a can therefore be
written as the vector sum
a = p + g + c + m,
(2.3)
where p, g, c, and m are the pressure, gravitational, Coriolis, and frictional forces per unit
mass, respectively. Since acceleration is the rate of change of velocity
Du
= p + g + c + m.
Dt
(2.4)
The fundamental equation of motion for fluids is the Navier-Stokes equation, which describes
the forces acting on a unit volume of a fluid. For incompressible fluids ( dρ
dt = 0), it is obtained
from (2.4) by multiplication with the fluid density ρ. In the special case of interest, i.e. oceanic
surface wind waves, the Coriolis force can be neglected2 and the Navier-Stokes equation
reduces to
ρ
Du
= ρ (p + g + m ) = −∇p + ρg + µ∇2 u ,
Dt
(2.5)
with the dynamic viscosity µ.
2.1.3 Potential Flow
Expanding the material derivative on left hand side of the Navier-Stokes equation (2.5) gives
ρ
Du
∂u
=ρ
+ ρ(u · ∇)u.
Dt
∂t
(2.6)
Due to the nonlinear term (u·∇)u, a general analytical solution to the Navier-Stokes equation,
is not known. However, a number of special solutions exist and in many cases the equation
can be linearized without introducing unreasonable error.
Using the vector identity
1
(u · ∇)u = (∇ × u) × u + ∇u2
2
(2.7)
and the definition of the vorticity ω ≡ ∇×u, the Navier-Stokes equation can then be rewritten
as
ρ
2
6
∂u
1
+ ρ(ω × u) + ρ (∇u2 ) = −∇p + ρg + µ∇2 u .
∂t
2
(2.8)
This approximation holds as long as the frequencies of the considered motions are large compared to the
Earth’s angular frequency (see e.g. Kinsman, 1965).
2.2 Water Waves
As a consequence of Kelvin’s circulation theorem (Kundu, 2007), an inviscid flow, upon which
only conservative body forces act, remains irrotational if it was at some point irrotational.
This applies to surface waves that were generated from rest. However, the circulation theorem
requires that the last term in (2.8) vanishes. The effects of the small viscosity of water are
confined to boundary layers and do not affect the propagation of waves significantly (Kundu,
2007).
For irrotational or potential flow with ω = 0, the fluid’s motion is conservative, allowing for
the definition of a velocity potential Φ in such a way that
(2.9)
u ≡ ∇Φ.
2.1.4 Bernoulli Equation
Although historically Bernoulli formulated his famous equation before the Navier-Stokes equation was found, it can be derived from the latter or, more precisely, from the Euler equation,
which is the formulation for inviscid fluids. Dividing (2.8) by ρ, dropping the viscosity term
and rearranging the others, substituting g = −∇(gz),
∂u
1
∇p
+ ∇( u2 ) +
+ ∇(gz) = −(ω × u) .
∂t
2
ρ
(2.10)
For barotropic flow, where the fluid’s density is a function of pressure only (ρ = ρ(p)),
1
∇p = ∇
ρ
Z
dp
ρ
(2.11)
and thus the Euler equation can be condensed to
Z
1 2
dp
∂u
+∇ u +
+ (gz) = −(ω × u) .
∂t
2
ρ
(2.12)
This further simplifies for irrotational flows, with ω = 0 and (2.9), to finally yield the Bernoulli
equation for inviscid and irrotational (unsteady) flows:
∂Φ 1 2
∇
+ u +
∂t
2
Z
dp
+ (gz) = 0 .
ρ
(2.13)
After this rather general introduction to some concepts of fluid dynamics, the next section
will treat some special characteristics of surface waves.
7
2 Theory
Figure 2.1: Coordinate system for the description of wave propagation.
2.2 Water Waves
2.2.1 Small Amplitude Waves
Surface wave propagation was already studied in the 19th century by Airy, Stokes, and Boussinesq (Airy, 1845; Boussinesq, 1872; Stokes, 1849). In this section, the dispersion relation for
small amplitude or Airy waves is deduced for irrotational and incompressible flows. Making
the assumption of plane waves, the three-dimensional problem can be reduced to a twodimensional problem, with the wave propagating in the x-direction and the z-axis pointing in
the direction opposite to gravity (see figure 2.1). The small amplitude constraint implies that
the wave amplitude a is small compared to the wavelength λ, i.e. a/λ 1. In an irrotational
flow a velocity potential can be defined such that
ux =
∂Φ
,
∂x
uz =
∂Φ
.
∂z
(2.14)
If the flow is incompressible, (2.14) can be combined with the equation of continuity ∇ · u = 0
to yield the Laplace equation for the velocity potential
∂2Φ ∂2Φ
+
= 0.
∂x2
∂z 2
(2.15)
Certain boundary conditions have to be specified to obtain a unique solution of the Laplace
equation. For surface waves, the kinematic boundary conditions state that fluid particles
remain in the fluid and can never leave it. This implies that at the bottom of the water body
(ocean, wind-wave facility, etc.)
∂Φ ∂z 8
= uz (−H) = 0,
z=−H
(2.16)
2.2 Water Waves
because fluid particles cannot flow into the bottom. At the free surface, a fluid particle’s
vertical velocity uz has to be equal to the rate of change of the surface level:
Dη = uz (η)
Dt z=η
∂η
∂η ∂Φ + ux =
∂t
∂x ∂z z=η
(2.17a)
.
(2.17b)
z=η
This second boundary condition is nonlinear. To obtain analytical solutions, (2.17) has to be
linearized. Since a/λ 1, the surface slope
∂η
∂x
at z = η is small. For small motions, also ux
is small (see Kundu, 2007), thus the second term on the left hand side of (2.17b) is quadratic
in small quantities and can be neglected. The term on the right hand side of (2.17b) needs
to be evaluated at the (unknown) water surface z = η. To a first order of accuracy, it can be
evaluated at z = 0 instead. With these assumptions (2.17b) simplifies to
∂η
∂Φ =
∂t
∂z .
(2.18)
z=0
The third boundary condition, the dynamic boundary condition at the free surface takes into
account that the pressure difference between the air above the surface and the water just
below the surface is the pressure caused by the surface tension σ:
p
z=η
σ
=− .
r
(2.19)
Again, for small amplitude waves this condition can be evaluated at z = 0 instead of z = η
without unreasonable loss of accuracy.
The curvature 1/r of the water surface η(x) in (2.19) can be approximated as
1
∂ 2 η/∂x2
∂2η
=
≈
,
r
∂x2
[1 + (∂η/∂x)2 ]3/2
(2.20)
since a/λ 1 implies that the surface slope ∂η/∂x is also small.
The velocity potential Φ needs to fulfill the Bernoulli equation (2.13), which can be linearized
for small amplitude waves by omitting the u2 factor as being of second order. The equation,
evaluated at z = η using (2.19) and (2.20) and absorbing the integration constant into Φ (for
a more detailed discussion and complete derivation see Kundu (2007)), then transforms to
∂Φ σ ∂2η
=
− gη
∂t z=η
ρ ∂x2
(2.21)
9
2 Theory
Again, using the small amplitude constraint, we can evaluate
z = η, so
∂Φ
∂t
at z = 0 rather than at
∂Φ σ ∂2η
=
− gη.
∂t z=0
ρ ∂x2
(2.22)
The Laplace equation for Φ (2.15) needs to be solved under the kinetic boundary conditions
(2.18) and (2.16). To get a unique solution, we have to specify a wave form for η(x, t). We
assume a monochromatic sinusoidal wave propagating in the x-direction,
η(x, t) = a cos(kx − ωt).
(2.23)
The motivation for using a sinusoidal wave is coming from the theory of Fourier analysis, which
states that any disturbance on the water surface can be decomposed into a linear superposition
of sinusoidal components. Wind waves on the ocean are not necessarily sinusoidal.
The derivation of the solution of (2.15) for Φ(x, z, t) can be found in Kundu (2007) and
Kinsman (1965), only the result is presented here:
Φ(x, z, t) =
aω cosh k(z + H)
sin(kx − ωt)
k
sinh kH
(2.24)
To get the dispersion relation, i.e. ω(k), we need to combine (2.24) with the dynamic boundary
condition (2.19), the definition of the velocity potential (2.9), and the sinusoidal wave ansatz
(2.23) which gives
s
ω=
σ 2
kg 1 + k tanh kH.
ρg
(2.25)
Deep Water Waves
In deep water and for sufficiently large wavenumbers k, kH 1 and thus tanh kH ≈ 1, so
that equation (2.25) simplifies and the phase velocity is given by
ω
c(k) = =
k
c(λ) =
r
g σ
+ k.
k
ρ
(2.26a)
s
gλ σ 2π
+
.
2π
ρ λ
(2.26b)
The dispersion relation for (pure) water with temperature T = 20 ℃, and consequently the
surface tension σ = 72.5 mN/m, c(λ), is shown in 2.2 (red solid curve). The green (dashed)
curve is obtained by neglecting the first term in (2.26b), the blue (dashdotted) curve by
neglecting the second term.
The first term under the root in (2.26b), the gravitational term, is ∝ λ, while the second,
the surface tension term, is ∝
1
λ.
It is thus clear that the first term is dominant for long
wavelengths, waves in this regime are called gravity waves, while the second is important for
10
2.2 Water Waves
Figure 2.2: Dispersion relation for the phase velocity of water waves (solid red) with contributions
from capillary waves (dashed green) and gravity waves (dashdotted blue).
very short wavelengths, where the absolute displacement of a fluid particle is not as important
as the relative displacement compared to its neighbors (which leads to increased curvature).
Waves in this regime, that are strongly depending on surface tension are called capillary waves.
The minimum of the combined relation is at λ = 1.71 cm, the corresponding phase velocity is
cmin = 23.1 cm.
Finite Depth Effects
In shallow water and for sufficiently small wavenumbers k when kH 1, tanh kH can be
approximated as tanh kH ≈ kH in (2.25), which then reduces to
ω=
p
p
kg tanh kH = k gH.
(2.27)
The capillary term can be neglected, since surface tension is negligible for small wavenumbers.
The phase speed equation (2.26b) simplifies to
c=
p
gH
(2.28)
and becomes independent of the wavelength or wavenumber. This approximation is accurate
with errors of less than 3 % if H < 0.07λ. Surface waves are thus regarded as shallow-water
waves if the water depth is < 7 % of the wavelength (Kundu, 2007).
11
2 Theory
2.2.2 Description of the Wave Field
The movement of the water surface of an ocean or lake appear random and chaotic. To
some extent they are, but in a sense that they can be described in terms of statistics. For
most practical purposes (and certainly for heat and gas transfer, themselves being statistical
processes), the behavior of single waves is not of interest.3
One way to describe the wave field is in terms of its Fourier transform, which is called the
wave spectrum. For a general introduction on the spectral description of wave fields see, for
instance, Phillips (1977).
Another way to statistically describe the water surface is in terms of probability density functions (PDFs) of elevation, slope, curvature, etc. The measurement instrument presented in
this work (see section 4.1) can directly measure the slope probability distribution for small
slopes. From the probability for these small slopes, statistical parameters like the variance of
the distribution – the mean square slope – can be estimated.
This requires that the shape of the PDF is known a priori and only some coefficients have
to be fitted to the acquired data. The slope PDF has been investigated for over 50 years and
various parameterizations have been published. Some of most important ones are presented
in the next section. The process of extracting statistical parameters from the measurement
data is described in section 5.2.
2.3 Surface Slope Probability Distribution
For most applications, it is neither practically possible nor reasonable to describe a water
surface in terms of the motions of single fluid packets. Especially for the description of larger
scale wave fields in the ocean, it is necessary to use a statistical description to capture the
essence of the wave motions. If processes on timescales which are much longer than the
lifetime of an individual wave, like gas exchange, are studied, using a statistical description
of the wave field is not a limitation.
The elevation of a random sea may be represented to a first approximation as the sum of
independent components, say sine waves. Consider the displacement at a single point
η (1) =
3
X
an cos(kn · x − ωn t + Θn ),
(2.29)
Tsunamis and rogue waves are prominent exemptions. Due to their sparseness, they would not play a
significant role in any statistical description, yet their effects are devastating.
12
2.3 Surface Slope Probability Distribution
where kn is the vector wavenumber and ωn is the frequency, related to kn by the dispersion relation (2.25). Using trigonometric identities, and suitable substitutions (see Longuet-Higgins,
1963), this can be written in the form
0
η
(1)
=
N
X
0
ξn cos(k · x − σt) +
ξn0 sin(k
· x − σt) =
n=1
2N
X
α n ξn ,
(2.30)
n=1
where the αn are constants for a fixed position and time.
The αn and ξn can be interpreted as independent random variables that are symmetrically
distributed about the mean water level 0 with variance Vi . Then, from the central limit
theorem, it follows that the probability density function (PDF) p(η) converges to a Gaussian
distribution (Kendall and Stuart, 1977). A similar argument holds for the surface slope, which
is the derivative of the elevation.
However, non-linear interactions between the wave components in (2.30) arise from the nonlinearity of the Navier-Stokes equation. The water surface cannot be described as a linear
superposition of component waves and higher-order terms have to be accounted for:
η = αi ξi + αij ξi ξj + αijk ξi ξj ξk + . . . ,
(2.31)
where the summation convention is used and αi , αij , αijk , etc. are constants. In this higher
order description the ξi , ξj are not independent, so the central limit theorem no longer applies
and the joint PDF p(η) is no longer Gaussian.
The deviation of the slope PDF from a Gaussian distribution was already noticed by researchers in the middle of the last century (Cox and Munk, 1954b; Schooley, 1954). Since then,
a number of models have been developed to parametrize and interpret the non-Gaussianity
of the distribution, some of which will be presented in the following sections.
2.3.1 Gram-Charlier Expansion
The first and most widespread parametrization of the slope probability distribution was given
by Cox and Munk (1954a). They made use of the fact that the non-linear wave-wave interactions are rather weak and that a Gaussian distribution needs small variations only to describe
the slope PDF. These deviations from the normal distribution are described in terms of a
Gram-Charlier series (Kendall and Stuart, 1977):


∞
X
1
1
p(s∗x , s∗y ) =
exp − (s∗x 2 + s∗y 2 ) 1 +
cij Hi (s∗x )Hj (s∗y ) .
2πσx σy
2
(2.32)
i,j=1
Here, s∗x =
sx
σx
=
1 ∂η
σx ∂x
and s∗y =
sy
σy
=
1 ∂η
σy ∂y
are the normalized slope components in the cross-
and upwind directions. Hi , Hj are Hermite polynomials, the first five are given in table 2.1.
13
2 Theory
H0 (x)
1
H1 (x)
x
H2 (x)
x2 − 1
H3 (x)
x3 − 3x
H4 (x)
x4 − 6x2 + 3
p(0,sy*)
Table 2.1: The first five Hermite polynomials.
sy*
Figure 2.3: The Gram-Charlier expansion (red) according to (2.33) with the coefficient parametrization of Bréon and Henriot (2006), for U = 10 m/s. The green line is the corresponding
Gaussian. The effects of skewness and peakedness are clearly visible.
The series expansion is usually truncated and two empirical facts are included: (1) The mean
slope is negligible over an area much greater than the longest ocean wavelength. (2) There is
no asymmetry crosswind (as long as the directions of wind and wave propagation are aligned)
(Cox and Munk, 1954b). The Gram-Charlier expansion the reduces to (Cox and Munk,
1956)
p(s∗x , s∗y )
1
1
1
1 ∗2
∗2
=
exp(− (sx + sy )) 1 − c21 (s∗x 2 − 1)s∗y − c03 (s∗y 3 − 3s∗y )
2πσx σy
2
2
6
(2.33)
1
1
1
∗4
∗2
∗2
∗2
∗4
∗2
+ c40 (sx − 6sx + 3) + c22 (sx − 1)(sy − 1) + c04 (sy − 6sy + 3).
24
4
24
Despite their low number of samples under limited variation of environmental conditions,
Cox and Munk’s data is generally accepted to be the benchmark for every new PDF that is
proposed (Zappa et al., 2008). A recent study evaluating millions of satellite images collected
all over the world found good agreement with the Cox-Munk-PDF (Bréon and Henriot (2006)).
The deviation of the Gram-Charlier PDF (red) from a Gaussian distribution (green) is shown
in 2.3, its strength is determined by the skewness coefficients c21 and c03 as well as the
peakedness coefficients c40 , c22 , and c04 . Skewness causes an asymmetry of the distribution
and shifts the maximum to slightly negative values. Peakedness increases the probabilities for
small and large slopes compared to a normal distribution (see 2.3).
14
2.3 Surface Slope Probability Distribution
Although this parametrization is arguably the most successful, it has been criticized by numerous authors (Liu et al., 1997a; Tatarskii, 2003; Wentz, 1976). Among the arguments given
against it are the fact that the truncated expansion is not positive for all values of sx , sy , thus
cannot represent a PDF. Longuet-Higgins (Longuet-Higgins, 1963) criticizes that Cox and
Munk fail to deliver a physical justification for the distribution and that any decent function
may be represented by such an expansion. However, Longuet-Higgins shows that for weakly
non-linear interacting waves a similar expansion, a truncated Edgeworth series (see Edgeworth, 1906), can be obtained. In his argumentation, the skewness of the distribution is due
to second order non-linear wave-wave interactions, while the peakedness is due to third-order
interactions.
2.3.2 Bound Wave Model
An attempt to give additional physical insight into the causes for the skewness of the distribution, beyond the fact that it is caused by nonlinear interaction, is made by Longuet-Higgins
(1982). He theoretically investigates multiple effects that could cause non-linearities and finds
that the only effect that can yield skewness of the correct magnitude and sign is the modulation of ripples that are riding on longer waves. The ripples do not “see” the mean free water
surface, but propagate on a tilted, slowly changing, water surface.
Based on this work, Plant (2003b) obtains a new formulation of the slope PDF by distinguishing two types of waves: free waves and bound waves. Free waves are created directly
by the wind, while bound waves arise from non-linear wave interactions. In this model, the
slope distribution is the superposition of two statistically independent Gaussian distributions
for free and bound waves. Plant (2003a) shows that this approach is in agreement with the
Cox & Munk Gram-Charlier parametrization, see figure 2.4.
Another parametrization using multiple Gaussians is given by Tatarskii (2003). Fitting 6 noncentered, non-normalized Gaussians and using fourth order polynomials for the coefficients’
dependence on wind speed, the Cox and Munk data can be accurately described. In using
such a large number of Gaussians, any effort of a physical interpretation is dropped, since any
sufficiently smooth and positive function can be approximated by a sum of Gaussians.
2.3.3 Non-Gaussian Distributions
Motivated by the fact that the Gram-Charlier expansion is not suited to describe large slopes,
other non-Gaussian distributions have been proposed. Based on PDFs for wavelength and
wave height given by Longuet-Higgins (1975) and assuming statistical independence of both,
Liu et al. (1997b) derives the following expression for the wave slope PDF (in terms of the
variables used in equation (2.33)):
15
2 Theory
Figure 2.4: Comparison of bound wave/free wave model to Gram-Charlier parametrization. The
solid curve is the Gram-Charlier fit to Cox & Munk data for wind speed U = 13.5 m/s.
Circles and squares are the Gaussian PDFs representing bound and free waves, respectively. The asterisks are the sum of circles and squares and coincide with the solid curve.
From Plant (2003a).
p(s∗x , s∗y )
"
#−(n+2)/2
s∗y 2
n
s∗x 2
+
.
=
1+
2π(n − 1)σx σy
n−1 n−1
(2.34)
The parameter n is called the peakedness coefficient, a skewness term has to be added to equation (2.34) in order to fit experimental data. For large values of n, the proposed formulation
is approaching a Gaussian distribution.
Another approach leading to a non-Gaussian slope PDF is given in Chapron et al. (2000).
The surface is described as a collection of randomly distributed patches in the order of meters.
These patches encompass a dense population of gravity-capillary and short-scale waves and
the local slope PDF within a patch is assumed to be Gaussian, while the slope variance
parameter is allowed to vary randomly from patch to patch. The resulting slope PDF then is
non-Gaussian and, after Bayes’ theorem, written as
Z
p(s) =
16
p(s|α)p(α)dα.
(2.35)
2.4 Reflections at the Water Surface
2.4 Reflections at the Water Surface
2.4.1 The Fresnel Equations
When a beam of light hits the water surface, a portion of the intensity is reflected. Since
the water surface is, no matter how many waves may be present, smooth at the scale of the
optical wavelengths, the water surface acts like a mirror on the incident beam. This mirror
may be curved (by waves) and thus focus or defocus the beam. It certainly is not perfect,
since by far the largest portion of the intensity is penetrating the water body. The reflection
and transmission coefficients are given by the Fresnel equations, which can be derived from
the fundamental Maxwell equations (see, for instance Hecht, 2001; Jackson, 1998). Here, only
the result is given:
q
2
na
2
1
−
(
sin
θ
)
i
n
na cos θi − nw cos θt
w

q
Rs =
=
na
na cos θi + nw cos θt
na cos θi + nw 1 − ( nw sin θi )2
 q
2
na
2
2 − n cos θ
n
sin
θ
)
1
−
(
i
w
i
a
nw
na cos θt − nw cos θi

= q
Rp =
na
na cos θt + nw cos θi
2
na 1 − ( nw sin θi ) + nw cos θi
2

na cos θi − nw
(2.36)
(2.37)
In the second formulation, Snell’s law
nw
sin θi
=
sin θt
na
(2.38)
was used to express θt in terms of θi and the refractive indices of air na and water nw .
The first equation holds for light that is polarized in the direction perpendicular to the plane
of the incident and reflected ray, the second equation for light that is polarized in the direction
parallel to the reflection plane. Unpolarized light is a superposition of both, thus the total
reflection coefficient R = (Rs + Rp )/2.
Setting na = 1 and nw = 4/3, the reflection coefficient is
1
49
for normal incidence. As can be
seen from figure 2.5, the reflected intensity is practically constant for near normal incidence
with incidence angles up to 0.3 rad. Since in our experimental setup only small incidence angles
occur, the angular dependence of the reflectivity can be dropped and reflection brightness can
be considered independent of the incidence angle.
2.4.2 Reflection and Refraction
When a beam of light is reflected and refracted at the water surface, the direction of both
the reflected and the refracted beam depend on the “direction” of the surface – the surface
slope. From the reflection condition θin = θout or Snell’s law in (2.38), the slope can be
recovered when the directions of the incident and reflected or refracted beams are known,
respectively. Figure 2.6 shows the basic principle of how the surface slope can be obtained
17
2 Theory
Figure 2.5: Left: Reflection coefficient as determined from the Fresnel formula for na = 1 and
nw = 34 .
Right: For near normal incidence, the reflection coefficient is practically constant at
about 2%.
from the direction of reflected and refracted light rays. Measurement techniques that employ
either one of the principles are presented in section 3.1.1.
2.4.3 Upwelling Light
In section 2.4.1 it was shown that only about 2 % of the incident light is reflected at the
air-water interface. For a reflection-based wave imaging method to produce accurate results,
it is necessary that reflections that can be seen in the images are actually coming from the
water surface and that light is not reflected off particles, sea-weed, fish etc. that are floating
in the water below the surface. These reflections can easily have the same (or even a higher)
intensity as those coming from the surface and can therefore hardly be separated. One possible
solution to the problem is using light with a wavelength that is absorbed in water. Visible
light is hardly absorbed by water, which is unfortunate because most cameras are optimized
for this part of the spectrum.
Fortunately, in the absorption spectrum of water, there is a peak in the near infrared at
970 nm (see figure 2.7) which is due to a vibrational excitation. By matching the light sources
as closely as possible to this peak, the penetration depth (i.e. the depth at which the intensity
has decreased to 1/e) can be significantly reduced and upwelling light be effectively suppressed.
While the penetration depth for red light at 650 nm is 295 cm (Pope and Fry, 1997), it is only
2.1 cm at 970 nm (Kou et al., 1993).
18
2.4 Reflections at the Water Surface
sin θa
n
4
= w≈
sin θw na
3
θin = θout
θin
θout
θa
θw
Figure 2.6: Left: Reflection: The incident angle equals the reflected angle.
Right: Refraction: According to Snell’s law, the ratio of the sines of the angles equals
the inverse ratio of the refractive indices.
19
2 Theory
Figure 2.7: The penetration depth of light in water. In the visible range (upper figure) the penetration depth is of the order of many meters, at the absorption peak at 970 nm (detail in
lower figure) of the order of cm. Data is from Pope and Fry (1997) (dashed line) and
Kou et al. (1993) (solid line).
20
3 Method
3.1 Historical Review of Measurement Methods
3.1.1 Optical Measurement Techniques
Over the past 60 years, a number of methods for measuring wave field parameters have been
developed. They range from relatively simple wave wires, that can measure water elevation
through the variation of resistance or capacity, to elaborated optical techniques, both for
laboratory and field use, as well as remote sensing methods, used from satellites, which can
detect wave heights and slopes either optically or by the use of radar backscattering. In this
chapter, the most important available methods are characterized and a historical overview is
given.
Optical methods can be divided into two groups, based on the physical principle they rely
on: refraction-based methods (see section 3.1.1) and reflection-based methods (see section
3.1.1). The fundamental physics of reflection and refraction were treated in section 2.4.
Numerous implementations of both methods have been made and there are advantages and
disadvantages to each of them, which will be described in the following sections. However,
only a short overview can be given here, reviews of pros and cons of the available methods
can also be found in (Balschbach, 2000; Fuß, 2004; Jähne et al., 1994, 2005; Rocholz, 2005).
Refraction-based Methods
The Cox Slope Gauge A slope meter based on the refraction of light at the air-water
interface was first used by Cox (1958). He placed an ink-filled wedge horizontally below a
wind wave flume. The wedge was illuminated uniformly from below, such that absorption by
the ink created a brightness gradient. Using a photometer and a telescope, he recorded time
series of the intensity of the light leaving the water at a certain point. Since the light refraction
is dependent on the surface slope, the rays that enter the telescope can be traced back to
different origins at the wedge. This way, slope in one direction is coded in light intensity.
Although this method was, in Cox’s own opinion, “less than ideal” since the intensity was
wave height, curvature and even slope dependent, especially for larger slopes, it provided a
good basis for further development.
21
3 Method
The Laser Slope Gauge In the 1970s, the Cox method was significantly improved by the
use of Lasers for lighting. When a Laser is installed in the water with the beam pointing
towards the surface, the light is refracted at the air-water-interface and from the deflection
the slope at a single point of the surface can be reconstructed. Tober et al. (1973) used
graded transmission filters for position detection of the refracted Laser beam, Sturm and
Sorrell (1973) and Scott (1974) used photo diodes that were extended in one dimension and
cylindrical lenses to focus the beam onto them. Both could, similar to Cox, measure only one
slope component at a time. Hughes et al. (1977) were the first to measure two-dimensional
slopes. The refracted laser was absorbed on a translucent screen, the position of the laser
point on the screen recorded with a modified video camera. By using telecentric lenses, they
could make their slope measurement independent of wave height. The maximum recordable
deflection and thus the maximum slope was determined by the diameter of the telecentric
lenses. The device was eventually installed on a buoy and deployed on the ocean.
A further improvement was the development of the scanning laser slope gauge (Bock and Hara,
1992), which can make de facto area measurements. The laser scans the water surface at very
high frequencies. The change of the surface shape during the scan interval is insignificant and
2D slope data can be recorded..
The Imaging Slope Gauge The imaging slope gauge (ISG) is an enhancement to Cox’s
method. The photo diode is replaced by a camera, which permits the measurement of the
slope in an extended area on the water surface. With an early implementation of the ISG
principle, Jähne and Riemer (1990) made the first systematic study of two-dimensional wave
spectra. Two orthogonal brightness gradients were used for illumination so that both slope
components could be measured in rapid sequence. Zhang and Cox (1994) was the first to
measure both slope components simultaneously by using a discrete two-dimensional color
matrix. More recent implementations of this color imaging slope gauge (CISG) make use of
continuous color gradients and high speed digital cameras (Balschbach, 2000; Rocholz, 2008).
Field measurements have been made using an ISG (Klinke and Jähne, 1995), however, since
either the light source or the camera have to be installed below the water surface, these
measurements are rather difficult and the field measurement device never made it past the
prototype phase.
Reflection-based Methods
Reflection-based ocean wave slope measurements have a long history. In contrast to refractionbased techniques, they do not need any submerged parts, illumination and detector can be
placed above the water surface. This feature makes them optimal candidates for field measurements.
Stereo Photography Optical wave measurements were performed as early as 1906, when
German photographers made use of stereo photography to study coastlines and found that
22
3.1 Historical Review of Measurement Methods
they could also gather useful information about waves by the same technique. A more detailed
historical account and explanation of the technique is given in section 3.1.2.
Cox & Munk Method Cox and Munk are the pioneers of wave slope imaging (as opposed to
wave amplitude imaging, that was done earlier with stereo photography). In 1954, they took
photometric (i.e. out of focus) images of sun glitter on the water surface from a plane and
were able to derive the wave slope PDF from the brightness distribution in the images. They
determined wave spectra, the dependency of mean square slope on wind speed and studied
the effects of surface slicks (Cox and Munk, 1954a, 1956, 1954b). Even though they could
only gather data on a very limited number of flights and with a relatively narrow spectrum
of environmental conditions, their slope measurements were (and to some extent still are)
benchmarks for other field measurement methods developed subsequently.
Stilwell Photography Stilwell (1969) used a different approach. He also relied on ambient
natural illumination, but instead of imaging sun glitter, he made use of the ambient sky light.
Under restricted environmental conditions, the sky can be used as an extended light source
with known luminance. A cloudless sky emits light with an intensity gradient in one direction
only, a completely overcast sky has uniform brightness. As was shown in section 2.4.1, the
reflection coefficient of the water surface depends on the incident angle. Combining these
effects, ideally, brightness of the image of the waves should only depend on surface slope.
Wave spectra can then be extracted from the image by means of Fourier transformation, a
technique applied to images of ocean waves already by Barber (1949). In contrast to the Cox
& Munk method, Stilwell photography can capture slope information for (almost) every point
in the image, a major drawback are severe restrictions on the environmental conditions under
which the method can be applied.
Reflective Slope Gauge The Reflective Slope Gauge or RSG works similarly to the Cox &
Munk method, but with an artificial light source. Early attempts of obtaining slope information by this method go back as far as 1954, when Schooley took flash photography images
of the water surface of the Anacostia River (Schooley, 1954). Later, Wu (1971) used a setup
with a light source and a telescope to obtain 1d slope information at a single point of the
water surface. Although Schooley and Wu could obtain some useful results, the method was
not widely used until the advent of digital image processing, when for the first time it was
possible to process larger amounts of images (Dieter, 1998; Waas and Jähne, 1992).
If a point-like light source is used, reflections, and therefore information about the surface
slope, can only be seen in isolated parts of the image. Theoretically, it would be possible to
use an intensity gradient in an extended light source for position coding (similarly to Stilwell
photography), however, this has not proven to be of use for the investigation of small-scale
waves due to lens effects caused by the curvature of the water surface. In theory, position
could also be coded using a light source with a color gradient, but since only 2 % of the light
23
3 Method
is reflected and 98 % is transmitted at the air-water interface, upwelling light, that is light
reflected from within the water (from floating particles, the bottom of a wind-wave facility,
etc.) might have higher intensity than the light reflected at the surface. This is a problem
especially for blue light, which has the highest penetration depth (see 2.4.1).
Polarimetric Imaging The reflection coefficient given by the Fresnel equations (2.37) depends on the polarization of the incident light. Polarimetric Imaging is an improvement of
Stilwell photography, in which not only the incident angle of reflected light is used to reconstruct surface slope, but also its polarization. From the measurement of the four component
Stokes vector, which contains the intensity, the degree of linear polarization as well as the circular polarization, the wave slope can be deduced (Zappa et al., 2008). Polarimetric imaging
poses the same constraints on environmental conditions as Stilwell photography, a uniformly
overcast or clear sky is needed. The implementation of Zappa et al. could not resolve capillary waves, because long integration times were needed, Pezzaniti et al. (2009) report that
integration times could be reduced to 1 ms at frame rates of 60 Hz.
Non-optical methods
Wave Wires Wave wires are vertically suspended in the water and can measure wave amplitude by measuring the change in capacity or resistance caused by a change in water height.
If one desires to measure gravity waves, these wires have sufficient precision. Fast changes
in water height, however, cannot be resolved, since water adhesion will not follow the fast
motion of the capillary waves. Wave spectra can be reconstructed from two-dimensional water elevation measurements using arrays of wave wires Donelan et al. (1985), but wires may
cause spurious waves or wakes when a net flow is present and thus influence each other’s
measurement.
Radar Backscatter Radar backscatter is “almost” an optical technique, since it also makes
use of electromagnetic radiation that is reflected at the water surface, like the reflection-based
methods described above. The main difference is that for optical methods, the wavelength of
the radiation is much smaller than the wavelengths occurring on the ocean surface, the ocean
surface appears to be smooth and reflects light like a mirror. Radar waves have wavelengths
comparable to those of short ocean waves, thus they are not reflected from a mirror but
scattered at a rough surface; interference effects (Bragg scattering etc.) become important. A
detailed description of radar scattering at the ocean surface is given by Valenzuela (1978).
Reflection vs. Refraction
For laboratory use, the refraction-based CISG has the advantage of the highest information
density. Slope information can be obtained for each point on the water surface. In laboratory
24
3.1 Historical Review of Measurement Methods
setups, the requirement of having either the light source, or the camera suspended into the
water (or placed beneath the water tank), is usually not a restriction.
For field measurements, the use of refraction-based methods is theoretically possible, but
interactions of the suspended part of the setup with the wave field cannot be avoided and
some sort of buoy is needed to hold the setup. Reflection-based methods do not need any
submerged parts, they can be mounted on a ship, a platform, a pier etc. Also, since they
do not get in contact with the water, they can be installed in such a way as to minimize
(or even eliminate) any distortion of the wave field. Two different measurement techniques
seem promising for field experiments under different conditions. Polarimetric (or Stilwell)
imaging has the advantage of a higher information density, but poses significant restrictions
on environmental conditions, limiting its applicability for field measurements. The Reflective
Slope Gauge cannot obtain continuous elevation and slope maps of the surface, but has the
advantage of being independent of natural illumination and thus of daytime and environmental
conditions. It can also measure wave statistics during experiments conducted at night (e.g.
heat transfer experiments).
3.1.2 Stereo Imaging of Water Waves
In contrast to most of the techniques presented in the preceding section, stereo photography
is measuring wave elevation and not wave slope. Since slope is the spatial derivative of
elevation, s(x, t) = ∇η(x, t), the wave elevation (relative to the mean water level) can be
reconstructed from two-dimensional slope measurements and wave slope can be determined
from two-dimensional water elevation measurements.
Historical Review
For a long period of time, stereo photography was seen as the only practical approach towards
measuring wave fields. It was used as early as 1904 by German oceanographers Laas and
Kohlschütter (Kohlschütter, 1906; Laas, 1905, 1906, 1921). At that time, ship-borne stereo
photography was primarily used for cartographic purposes, to determine the course of the
coastline. As a side effect, wave amplitudes and wavelengths could be determined. This
raised the interest of shipbuilders who could use reliable information on wave amplitude
distributions to estimate the necessary strength of the ship’s side to withhold the impact of
waves. Later, Schumacher did systematic measurements of waves using stereo photography
and for the first time also took time series at a frequency of 1 Hz (Schumacher, 1939, 1950). His
work ended abruptly at the outbreak of World War II. Not long after Schumacher reported on
the German experiments at a symposium on gravity waves organized by the National Bureau
of Standards in Washington D.C. (Schumacher, 1952), a massive American collaboration, the
Stereo Wave Observation Project (SWOP) was launched. Air-borne stereo images were taken
and simultaneous wave pole reference measurements were conducted aboard a research vessel
25
3 Method
in the same area. The manual evaluation of the images was costly and time consuming and
despite big personal and financial efforts, only 2 of 100 image pairs were evaluated to yield
directional wave spectra (Cote et al., 1960).
Later attempts to extend the measurement of wave spectra to the capillary wave range by
e.g. Dobson (1970), Holthuijsen (1983a), Holthuijsen (1983b), Shemdin et al. (1988), and
Banner et al. (1989) only had meager success. The number of images that were evaluated
were limited due to the huge effort which was necessary. This problem could only be solved
with the development of automated digital image processing (Waas, 1988). Especially for the
smaller waves, another effect became significant: the stereo images of waves were similar, but
not identical. The reason and consequence of this inherent problem of stereo wave imaging is
explained in the following section.
Correspondence Problem
The main task in stereo imaging is finding corresponding points, that is, finding the location
of an object in the two stereo images. Once an object is found in both images, its distance
from the stereo camera setup is readily determined, provided that the necessary extrinsic
calibration parameters (i.e. the position and rotation of the cameras relative to each other)
are known.
The correspondence problem cannot be solved in general, certain conditions have to be met
by the objects of interest as well as by their environment. Complications can be caused by:
• occlusions: two objects may overlap, one may be (partly) hidden by another
• discontinuities: the surface of objects may be discontinuous, which one might only see
from one angle
• brightness differences: objects may have different brightnesses when viewed from different angles due to directed reflection
All these effects influence the appearance of an object in an image, thus complicating the
matching of the same object in two images. Fortunately, the water surface is relatively well
behaved and does not usually show a lot of these features. Discontinuities and occlusions only
occur when waves break.1
Stereo imaging works well when objects have distinctive structures that separate them from
the background. Unfortunately, the water surface is not usually well structured (although
small capillary waves give some sort of structure). Complications for stereo imaging arise
from another characteristic of the water surface: on the scale of the optical wavelengths, the
water surface is smooth, making it a near perfect specular reflector (i.e. it reflects light like
a mirror). As a consequence, when looking at the water surface, one does not really see the
water surface itself, but the light source that is illuminating it.
1
As long as the distance to the water surface is sufficiently larger than the maximum wave amplitude.
26
3.1 Historical Review of Measurement Methods
Figure 3.1: Left: Stereo imaging with an arbitrary light source: reflections into the two cameras
come from different spots on the water surface.
Right: Using two light sources in complementary positions, reflections into the corresponding cameras come from the same spots. Reflections into the “wrong” cameras have
to be suppressed.
Stereo imaging works well with Lambertian reflectors, which emit light of the same intensity
in all directions and avoid brightness differences in the two images. Accurate stereo imaging
of the water surface is possible only by arranging cameras and light sources in a distinctive
way, described in section 3.1.2 and developed by Waas and Jähne (1992). The inherent
inaccuracies of stereo imaging of water waves with natural illumination limit its applicability
to the measurement of gravity waves (Jähne et al., 2005).
The Reflective Stereo Slope Gauge – RSSG
Waas and Jähne (Waas, 1988, 1992) combined the slope measurement principle of the reflective
slope gauge (see 3.1.1) with water elevation (height) measurements from stereo photography
and thus developed the reflective stereo slope gauge (RSSG). By using artificial light sources,
they were able to solve the correspondence problem for capillary waves and overcome the
limitations of stereo imaging of the water surface.
Figure 3.1 illustrates the problem of an arbitrarily positioned light source, where the two
cameras see reflections coming from different spots on the water surface. In this case, stereo
imaging is inaccurate, the waves look different in both images, and corresponding points can
hardly be found resulting in inevitable mismatches. A similar argument holds for arbitrary
extended light sources, like ambient sky light. Therefore, the RSSG can neither rely on Sun
glitter nor on ambient sky light for illumination.
This general problem of stereo imaging at specular surfaces can be circumvented if two light
sources are used, as is also shown in figure 3.1. The light sources need to be arranged in
such a way that the path of the light beam is the same for both cameras. This requires the
light sources to be positioned in the center of the image sensor, which obviously is impossible.
Fortunately, the requirement can be weakened, it is sufficient for paths of the light beam to
27
3 Method
overlap when projected onto axes parallel and perpendicular to the stereo base. This allows
for the light sources to be placed next to the cameras in a direction normal to the stereo base,
as is done in the experimental setup described in the next chapter.
If the light sources and cameras are arranged in this way, the reflections that can be seen in
the two images are equal and corresponding points are easy to determine from the shape of
the reflections.
The distance to the water surface (and thereby water elevation and wave amplitude) can then
be computed from the parallax (i.e. the shift of the same reflection from one image to the
other) of the reflections, which allows a partial 3-dimensional reconstruction of the wave field.
Since the distance of the water surface is known for a limited number of points only, it needs
to be interpolated. The exact shape of the wave field, especially its structure in the capillary
range cannot be recovered.
Knowledge of the distances of the individual speckles is also needed for exact calibration
of the slope measurements (see section 3.2). The dependence of the slope corresponding to
a reflection at a certain image position on the height is rather weak and a mean calibration
usually sufficient, but since the distances can easily be determined for each reflection, a precise
calibration is possible.
In the next sections, the principles of height and slope measurements with the reflective stereo
slope gauge are explained in detail.
3.2 Slope Measurement Principle
The simplified picture in figure 3.2 illustrates the slope measurement principle. A light ray
coming from the light source is reflected at the water surface according to the reflection
condition θin = θout ; the direction of the reflected ray is determined by the surface tilt angle.
A surface slope that is corresponding to visible reflections can be assigned to each pixel in the
image, the equations become more complex when camera and light source are mounted on a
ship that itself may be moving.
3.2.1 The Geometry of Reflection
Figure 3.3 shows the basic geometry of reflection for the RSSG setup. A beam of light
coming from the light source at point L is reflected at the water surface, according to the
reflection condition . If the water surface tilt α at a position P on the surface is such that
−→ −→
−→ −→
(PL, PN) = (PC, PN), where P, L, N, and C lie in the same plane, the beam of light is
reflected into the camera and a speckle is seen in the image. In this case, the surface normal
vector
n∗ = r̂ − î,
28
(3.1)
3.2 Slope Measurement Principle
e
surfac
norm
al
ent
ra
y
inci
d
ct
ed
ray
re
fle
α
θ out θ in
Figure 3.2: The surface tilt angle α under which a reflection of
the light source is visible in the camera is uniquely
determined by the reflection condition.
L
C
N
x
α
y
n
i
r
z
φ
P
Figure 3.3: The geometry of reflection: A beam of light from the
light source at L is reflected at the point on the water
surface P into the camera at C, if the surface slope is
such that θin = θout .
29
3 Method
where î is the vector of unit length in the direction of the incident beam and r̂ is the vector
of unit length in the direction of the reflected beam. It is convenient to normalize the surface
normal vector such that its third component nz = 1, then


tan α cos ϕ


n =  tan α sin ϕ  ,
1
(3.2)
where α is the surface tilt zenith angle and ϕ the azimuth from the direction of the wind.
If x is taken to be the downwind direction, the first two components of n are the x- and
y-components of the surface slope vector
s=
" #
sx
sy
"
=
#
tan α cos ϕ
tan α sin ϕ
"
=
∂η/∂x
#
∂η/∂y
.
(3.3)
To write down equation (3.1) in terms of image coordinates and light source and camera
positions as well as water surface distance, further computation is necessary. It is convenient
to work with three different coordinate systems, or reference frames, which will be detailed in
the next section.
3.2.2 Reference Frames
The surface slope needs to be measured in a reference system with the x-y-plane being the
plane of the mean free water surface level, with the x-axis pointing in the downwind direction, and the z-axis aligned with gravity, which from here on will be called world coordinate
system.
The positions of the cameras and light sources can are known in a reference system with the
origin at the middle of the stereo base, the x-axis aligned with the stereo base, the y-axis in
the direction given by the expansion of the light sources, and the z-axis pointing towards the
water surface. This system will be referred to as stereo base coordinate system, vectors given
in this system will be denoted with the index sb.
Finally, since the cameras are tilted towards each other to ensure overlapping images in the
desired distance, we need to introduce a third frame of reference, the camera coordinate system.
Its x- and y-axes are aligned with the direction of the x and y pixel coordinates on the image
sensor, respectively, its z-axis is pointing into the direction of view (and thus towards the
water surface). Vectors in the camera coordinate system have the index c.
3.2.3 Transformations Between the Reference Frames
The surface slope needs to be measured in world coordinates. The coordinates of the reflections
in the images are given in the camera coordinate system, while information on pitch and roll
30
3.2 Slope Measurement Principle
Figure 3.4: The relative positioning of the three coordinate
systems. The y-axes are pointing out of the image
plane. The depiction is exact if the pitch angle
ψ = 0. The light sources are virtually placed at
the position of the aperture of the cameras.
of the ship will be measured by the inclination sensor in the stereo base coordinate system.
To combine this information, it is necessary to know how to transform coordinates from one
reference frame into another. Figure 3.4 shows the relative positioning of the coordinate
systems in the simplified case of zero pitch.
Stereo Base Coordinate System to Camera Coordinate System
The origin is shifted from the middle of the stereo base to the center of the image sensor, that
lies on the x-axis of the stereo base coordinate system. Thus, a shift of ± b/2 (with stereo
base b) is necessary (more general: the origin is shifted by csb , the position of the camera in
the stereo base coordinate system and origin of the new coordinate system). Furthermore,
the cameras are rotated about an axis parallel to the y-axis of the stereo base system by the
angle τ . The coordinate transformation can be described with the rotation matrix (C(τ )):

cos (τ )
0 sin (τ )


 (xsb − csb ) .
− sin (τ ) 0 cos (τ )

xc = C(τ ) (xsb − csb ) = 
0
1
0
(3.4)
Stereo Base Coordinate System to World Coordinate System
For a static laboratory setup, the stereo base coordinate system can be chosen to coincide
with the world coordinate system – except for a shift of the origin by the distance h, the
elevation of the stereo base relative to the mean water level (see figure 3.4).
31
3 Method
Figure 3.5: Nomenclature of rotational degrees of freedom for ships: Yaw is a rotation about the
vertical axis, pitch is a rotation about the transverse axis, and roll is a rotation about
the longitudinal axis.
During field experiments on research vessels however, the stereo base is not always parallel to
the mean water level, since the ship may be pitching and rolling in longer waves and swell (see
figure 3.5 for ship rotation nomenclature). The wind following system described in section
4.1.1 will ensure that the stereo base is always pointing in the up-/downwind direction during
acquisition, so that no “yaw” correction is needed.
Using an inclination sensor, the inclination angles ψ due to pitch and ρ due to roll can be
measured. The stereo base coordinate system can then be rotated so that its z-axis is pointing
in the direction of gravity. If then the origin is shifted along this axis to the mean water level,
the world coordinate system is obtained. The complete transformation for an arbitrary vector
from stereo base coordinates to world coordinates is:
 
0
 
x = P(ψ) R(ρ) xsb −  0 
h



 
1
0
0
cos (ρ) 0 − sin (ρ)
0



 
= 0 cos (ψ) − sin (ψ)  0
1
0
 xsb −  0  .
0 sin (ψ)
cos (ψ)
sin (ρ) 0
cos (ρ)
(3.5)
h
3.2.4 Ray Geometry
The question that needs to be answered for slope probability measurement is: What is the
surface slope corresponding to a reflection at the image coordinates u, v?
32
3.2 Slope Measurement Principle
As will be shown, this slope does not only depend on the image coordinates, but also on the
height of the camera above the water surface. This height can be assumed to be known, since
it is retrieved from stereo triangulation described in section 3.3.
By the intercept theorem, we know that

 

u
xc /zc

 

 v  = f  yc /zc  ,
1
f
(3.6)
with the image coordinates u, v, and the focal length2 f in pixels. If the distance zc of an
object (e.g. a reflection on the water surface) is known, then its position in camera coordinates
is

  
zc u/f
xc

  
xc =  yc  = zc v/f  .
zc
zc
(3.7)
For each position xc in 3D space, the slope that is necessary to reflect light from a light source
at lc into the camera (pinhole) aperture at cc can be computed from equations 3.1 and 3.2:
rc
ic
cc − xc
xc − lc
n∗c = rˆc − iˆc =
−
=
−
.
|rc | |ic |
|cc − cc | |xc − lc |
(3.8)
Combining (3.7) and (3.8), we have the desired relation of image coordinates and slope. This
slope is given in the camera coordinate system, the transformation into world coordinates is
described in section 3.2.3.
n∗ = P(ψ) R(ρ) C−1 (τ ) n∗c
(3.9)
The vector then needs to be normalized according to (3.2) to obtain the slope components.
Figure 3.6 (left) shows the slope-position-function, which allows to determine the slope corresponding to a reflection at a certain image position, in terms of the pixel coordinates in
x-direction (the center of the image here has coordinates (0,0)). The slope is plotted for water surface distances of Z = 4 m, Z = 6 m, and Z = 8 m. Variation in water surface distance
of this order of magnitude can occur during ship-borne field experiments; figure 3.6 shows that
the calibration of the slope reconstruction needs to account for this distance variability.
In figure 3.6 (right) the slope-position-function is shown for typical laboratory conditions.
The water distance variability is much smaller – the five lines correspond to surface elevations
of -20 cm (blue dashes), -10 cm (green dots), 0 cm (solid red curve), 10 cm (yellow dashdots),
and 20 cm (pink spaced dashes) at a distance of 4.863 m, see 4.3 – thus the effect of distance
variation on the slope-position-function is negligible (note the different range of the abscissa).
The variations are in the order of 10−4 , the accuracy of the slope measurement is limited by
2
f is not the focal length which is given as a characteristic of a lens, but the actual distance of the image
sensor plane to the lens.
33
3 Method
Figure 3.6: Left: Slope-position-function for water surface distances Z = 4 m (red, solid), Z = 6 m
(green, dashed), and Z = 8 m (blue, dashdot). Used parameters: stereo base length
b = 300 mm, stereo reference height (see section 3.3) Z0 = 6000 mm.
Right: Slope-position-function for laboratory conditions. The lower variability in water
distance leads to smaller effects on slope calibration. Used parameters: stereo base length
b = 235 mm (see 4.1), stereo reference height Z0 = 4863 mm.
the finite size of the light source, to a precision of about 0.001. Thus, the effect of changing
water height is negligible for moderate wind speeds in the laboratory.
3.3 Height Measurement Principle
3.3.1 Distance from Stereo Triangulation
When an object is observed from different positions, it is observed from different perspectives.
The different perspectives lead to a shift of the projection of the object onto the image plane
(Jähne, 2005). Figure 3.7 illustrates the origin of this shift, called the stereo parallax. If the
stereo cameras have parallel optical axes and are not tilted towards each other, one finds from
figure 3.8 that the parallax is
p = xr − xl = f
X + b/2
X − b/2
f
−f
=b
Z
Z
Z
⇒
Z=b
f
.
p
(3.10)
In this simplified setup, the parallax is inversely proportional to the distance from the object
Z. The stereo setup used in the new implementation of the RSSG is more complicated. The
optical axes of the cameras are tilted towards each other to ensure maximum overlap of the
footprints at the mean water level (see figure 3.9).
The catch of using tilted axes is that images get distorted in the direction orthogonal to the
stereo base. This makes automated evaluation of the images more complex. With parallel
34
3.3 Height Measurement Principle
h1
h0
h2
stereo setup
image overlay
Figure 3.7: The effect of stereo parallax: An object at the reference distance h0 is projected onto the same image coordinates in both images. For smaller (h1 ) or greater
(h2 ) distances, image coordinates are shifted, the parallax is the relative shift in the overlay image.
left camera
xl
Z
f
b
xr
X
right camera
Figure 3.8: Schematic of a stereo camera setup with parallel optical axes. Modified after Jähne et al.
(2005).
35
3 Method
tilted axes
parallel axes
Figure 3.9: Left: Tilted optical axes allow setting of a reference height with maximum overlap of the
images. Distortions occur in the direction normal to the stereo base.
Right: Parallel optical axes lead to a decreased overlap of the size of the stereo base,
independent of the object distance. For small stereo base to distance fractions, this setup
is attractive due to simplified computations.
36
3.3 Height Measurement Principle
axes, objects are shifted only in the direction of the stereo base, therefore correlation algorithms used to find the most probable parallax may be limited to searching in 1D. For tilted
axes the search range has to be extended to 2D which increases the time needed for the computations. However, if parallel axes were used in the RSSG setup, at 6 m distance only about
60 % of the image areas would overlap and could be used for stereo height reconstruction.
3.3.2 Dependence of Parallax on Object Distance
As was noted before, the dependence of the parallax in the stereo images on the distance of
the object is more complex for tilted optical axes than the simple ∝
1
Z
relation derived in
equation 3.10 for parallel axes.
Consider a point xsb on the water surface. Light coming from this point is, in general,
projected onto different locations on the image sensor. These locations can be determined for
each of the cameras with the help of (3.4), which gives the transformation of a vector given
in stereo base coordinates to the respective camera coordinates3 :
xr,c = C(τ ) (xsb − cr,sb )
xl,c = C(−τ ) (xsb − cl,sb )
(3.11)
Note that the right camera is tilted by the angle τ , while the left camera is tilted by the angle
−τ , in the opposite direction. To get the parallax, we recall (3.6), which gives the image
coordinates u and v for any position xc :
 


ul
xl,c /zl,c
 


pl =  vl  = f  yl,c /zl,c 
f
1
 


ur
xr,c /zr,c
 


pr =  vr  = f  yr,c /zr,c 
f
1
(3.12)
Then, the two-dimensional parallax4 is given by
p = pl − pr = f
"
#
xl,c /zl,c
yl,c /zl,c
"
−
xr,c /zr,c
yr,c /zr,c
#!
(3.13)
.
Using the known camera positions cl,sb = (−b/2, 0, 0) and cr,sb = (b/2, 0, 0), parallax is
cos τ (x+ 21 b) − sin τ Z
1
 sin τ (x+ 2 b) + cos τ Z
y
sin τ (x+ 12 b) + cos τ Z

p=f
3
4
−
−
cos τ (x− 21 b) + sin τ Z
− sin τ (x− 12 b) + cos τ Z 
.
y
1
− sin τ (x− 2 b) + cos τ Z

(3.14)
Indices r and l denote the reference frames of the right and left camera, respectively.
The third component is dropped here, since it has no further significance, only the 2D image coordinates
are of interest.
37
3 Method
τ
τ
b
Z0
Figure 3.10: Tilted axes can be characterized by either the angle τ or by the stereo base b and the
reference height Z0 .
The relation in (3.14) needs to be solved for the height Z. To get a useful relation, instead
of the world coordinates x and y the left image coordinates ul and vl are used, see (3.12).
Equation (3.14) can be solved for the height Z, which gives:
b f 2 cos2 τ + (p1 ul − ul )(1 − cos2 τ ) − p1 f sin τ cos τ
Z=
.
p1 f (2 cos2 τ − 1) + (2f 2 + 2u2l − 2p1 ul ) sin τ cos τ
(3.15)
Note that only the first component p1 of the 2D parallax in (3.14) is needed to reconstruct
the water height. This was expected, since the p2 component is merely an artifact from image
distortions due to the tilting of the cameras. Also note that the result is consistent with the
result obtained for parallel optical axes; in the limiting case of τ = 0, from (3.15) one obtains
(3.10) as is required.
While (3.15) is descriptive in the sense that the limiting case of parallel axes can be easily
obtained, for practical purposes a different representation is advantageous. The tilting angle
τ is not an independent variable, but a function of stereo base length b and what will be called
stereo reference height Z0 . This reference height is the distance at which the images overlap
and an object at the image center has zero parallax. As can be seen from figure 3.10,
τ = arctan
b
2Z0
(3.16)
.
Using (3.16) and the trigonometric identities
sin (arctan x) = √
x
1 + x2
and
cos (arctan x) = √
1
,
1 + x2
equation (3.15) transforms to (the indices of ul and p1 are omitted for clarity)
38
(3.17)
3.3 Height Measurement Principle
Figure 3.11: The height-parallax-function. The red (solid) curve is for the center of the image (u =
0), the green (dashed) curve for a pixel at the image border (u = 656). Used parameters:
f = 72 mm, b = 300 mm, Z0 = 6000 mm.
b 4f 2 Z02 − 2pbf Z0 + pub2 − u2 b2
Z=−
.
−4pf Z02 − (4bu2 − 4pbu + 4bf 2 )Z0 + pf b2
(3.18)
In figure 3.11 the height-parallax dependence is plotted for parameters similar to those used
in field experiments, the stereo base b = 300 mm and the reference height Z0 = 6000 mm.
39
4 Setup and Simulation
In section 3.1.1, a number of wave measurement methods were presented. It was concluded
that the reflective slope gauge (RSG) is best suited to provide wave slope statistics during
field experiments when measurements have to be carried out under arbitrary environmental
conditions. Then, in section 3.1.2, it was shown how the reflective slope gauge can be enabled to also measure water elevation by using a stereo camera setup. This reflective stereo
slope gauge was first developed by Waas (1988, 1992). The technical limitations of the time
restricted the automated image evaluation and prevented the routine use of the instrument.
Dieter (1998) developed a new implementation of the RSSG principle in the late 1990s that
was also able to measure curvature statistics. This HSCI (height/slope/curvature instrument)
was used for measurements from a pier and from a research vessel on the open ocean, although
results are published for static pier measurements only.
4.1 Experimental Setup
4.1.1 Setup of the Stereo Camera System
The RSSG measurement principle was detailed in section 3.2 and 3.3. Simultaneous measurements of wave height and slope are possible by combining the reflective slope gauge principle
(see figure 3.2), which can measure slope statistics for small waves down to the capillary range,
and stereo photography (see figure 3.7), which can measure height statistics for gravity waves
and provide calibration data for the slope measurements.
Figure 4.1 shows the stereo camera setup that was used for laboratory experiments. Two
LED arrays are used for illumination and are fixed to the camera lenses. Figure 4.2 shows
the improved instrument that was built for field measurements. The size of the light sources
is increased almost by a factor of 4.
An important improvement over earlier realizations of the measurement principle by Waas
(1992) and Dieter (1998) is the use of near infrared light for illumination. By matching the
light spectrum to the water absorption band at 970 nm, the effect of upwelling light (see 2.4.3)
can be reduced.
All components of the RSSG were carefully selected, some of the criteria that were relevant
in the selection process are detailed below.
41
4 Setup and Simulation
Figure 4.1: Sketch of the setup used for laboratory experiments at the Aeolotron; two IR-LED arrays
(with 90 LEDs each) are fixed to the camera lenses, the stereo base is 235 mm.
Cameras
The cameras are required to have certain features:
• high sensitivity (quantum efficiency) in the near infrared
• high resolution to resolve reflections from small capillary waves
• high frame rate for good statistics
The cameras that were selected are a pair of Photonfocus MV1-D1312I-CL-12 CMOS-cameras
with enhanced infrared sensitivity. While all CCD and CMOS sensors are sensitive in the near
infrared, quantum efficiency is usually very low. The Photonfocus cameras with extended
infrared sensitivity were the best available product that at the same time met the other
requirements. Some specifications are given in table 4.1.
Camera data is read out by a frame grabber (Silicon Software MicroEnable 4 ). This special
interface is necessary because of the high data rate; acquiring mega-pixel images at a rate of
100 Hz with these cameras produces 540 MB/s of raw data.
The stereo base of the two-camera setup was 235 mm for laboratory experiments (figure 4.1).
In the field setup (figure 4.2), the stereo base was increased to 300 mm to increase the height
resolution.
42
4.1 Experimental Setup
Figure 4.2: The setup that will be used for field experiments. The stereo base is increased to 300 mm
and the LED arrays are built from 350 IR-LEDs each. The image acquisition system
consisting of cameras and light sources can be rotated about the center of the stereo
base.
43
4 Setup and Simulation
Camera Specifications
Resolution
1312 x 1082 pixel
Pixel size
8 µm x 8 µm
Spectral sensitivity
< 350 to 1100 nm
Exposure time
10 µs - 0.41 s
Frame rate
108 Hz
Grey scale resolution
12 bit
Table 4.1: Specifications of the Photonfocus MV1-D1312I-160
Figure 4.3: The radiation spectrum of the Osram SFH 4545 NIR-LEDs, measured with an Ocean
Optics Maya Pro spectrometer.
Light Sources
The light sources are required to have:
• an infra-red emission peak wavelength close to 970 nm for effective suppression of upwelling light (see section 2.4.3)
• a high luminous density to resolve waves with high curvature (see section 4.2.2)
• a uniform directional characteristic in the field of view of the camera
Light emitting diodes (LEDs) provide high and efficient power output with a sufficiently
narrow spectrum. After testing several candidate LEDs, it turned out that the requirement
of a high luminous density was only met by the Osram SFH 4545 LED. The specifications
of the light sources that are used in the experimental setup are given in table 4.2. Figure 4.3
shows the radiation spectrum of the used LEDs. The penetration depth in water for light at
the centroid wavelength 950 nm in water is about 3.4 cm (Kou et al., 1993).
44
4.1 Experimental Setup
Light Source Specifications
Number of LEDs per array
90 / 350 (lab/field)
LED model
Osram SFH 4545
Current rating single LED
- continuous mode
100 mA
- pulsed mode (2% duty factor)
1A
Current rating array (pulsed mode)
8A
Peak wavelength λP eak
940 nm
FWHM
36 nm
Array dimensions
15 x 322 mm / 33 x 550 mm (lab/field)
Penetration depth in water
3.4 cm (at 950 nm)
Table 4.2: Specifications of the light sources (LED arrays)
Each of the two light sources of the laboratory RSSG (figure 4.1) is built from 90 individual
LEDs. In field setup, even 350 LEDs are used in each of the arrays. The use of extended light
sources is necessary to ensure that reflections can be seen even in high curvature conditions.
On the other hand, it limits the resolution and accuracy of the slope measurements, which
only work if the origin of the light beam that is reflected is known. The compromise that
was made in the new RSSG design is to have the light sources extended in one direction
(the y-direction of the stereo base frame) and to measure only the slope component in the
other direction (the x-direction). In the field setup, it is possible to automatically turn the
acquisition unit to measure both downwind and crosswind components sequentially (see page
47).
The LED arrays are powered by a special LED controller (Gardasoft RT820F), which drives
the LEDs at a selected current and allows for pulsing and triggering using the trigger signal
from the frame grabber. Triggering and pulsing of the light sources is important for two
reasons: (1) Pulsing allows “overdriving” the LEDs, at up to ten times the current rating
for continuous use, and (2) triggering is necessary to synchronize the LED pulses with the
cameras.
The trigger scheme for cameras and light sources is shown in figure 4.4. As described in section
3.1.2, stereo imaging requires that each camera only “sees” the opposite light source, so during
acquisition of the left image, only the right light source can be powered and vice versa. The
two images are acquired sequentially, separated by the exposure time of one image (0.2 ms).
Of course the wave field cannot be allowed to change significantly between the acquisition of
the left and right image, otherwise corresponding points (see section 3.1.2) could not be found
in the images.
To ensure an optimum signal-to-noise ratio, the full dynamic range of the cameras should be
used. Due to the large variability in reflection brightness described in section 4.2.2, using a
bright light source will easily oversaturate images taken at lower wind speeds. Oversaturation
may occur in field experiments when the wind speed is suddenly changing, but also in laboratory experiments when wind speed is continuously increased or decreased, as is done during
45
4 Setup and Simulation
Figure 4.4: Trigger scheme for sequential image acquisition: The left camera and right light source
are synchronized and vice versa.
some gas exchange measurements. Therefore, an adaptive control of the LED brightness was
implemented, based on gray value histograms of the images.
Lenses and Filters
The focal length of the lenses is an important parameter for the RSSG. It determines the size
of the footprint on the water surface – which should be large enough to resolve gravity waves
– and the resolution for small structures – which has to be fine enough to resolve capillary
waves.
In the RSSG, lenses with a focal length of 70 mm (Schneider Kreuznach Tele-Xenar 2.2/700902 ) are used. At the mean operating distance of 6 m, the total footprint is 87 cm x 72 cm,
the resolution is 0.7 mm/pixel. To reduce background light, infrared filters with a cutoff wavelength of 850 nm (B+W infrared filter 093) are used. They effectively suppress light coming
from the room illumination as well as from other experimental setups in the laboratory. They
will possibly not be able to suppress direct reflections of sunlight during field experiments,
but since experiments will be conducted at night, this is not a restriction.
If needed, the RSSG can be upgraded with filters that have a cutoff wavelength closer to the
LED spectrum at 940 nm. Since sunlight in this spectral range is mostly absorbed by water
vapor in the atmosphere, ambient light can be effectively suppressed.
46
4.1 Experimental Setup
Wind Adaptation
In laboratory wind wave facilities, the wind direction is known and constant at all times, and
downwind and crosswind slopes can easily be measured separately. On a research vessel on
the open ocean, the situation is more complex. The ship is usually aligned with the wind,
its bow pointing upwind, to reduce distortions of the wind and wave field. However, the
wind direction can change faster than the ship can be realigned. To continuously measure
the downwind or crosswind component of the slope distribution, the RSSG has an integrated
stepping motor that can rotate the acquisition unit consisting of cameras and LED arrays
(see figure 4.2).
Wind direction (and speed) is measured with a Young anemometer installed close to the image
acquisition system; the direction of the stereo base is adjusted on-line to adapt to changes
in wind direction or to switch between the measurement of different slope components by a
rotation of 90 degrees.
Data Acquisition System
In figure 4.5, a schematic of the data acquisition system is given. The whole process of
data and image acquisition is controlled by the heurisko software on the measurement PC.
The cameras are controlled by the frame grabber, which creates a trigger signal that is used
not only for the cameras but also for the light sources. The light sources are powered with
a special controller which can be programmed from the PC with an Ethernet link. Wind
and ship inclination data is acquired from the anemometer and the inclination sensor (via
a Meilhaus A/D USB interface). Wind data is used to set the parameters for the stepping
motor which enables following the wind direction; ship inclination data (pitch and roll) is
recorded for the evaluation of the slope measurements.
The advantage of controlling all devices from one software is obvious: it permits easy and
on-line response to changing environmental conditions: If the wind direction changes, the
stereo base can be rotated, so the RSSG continues to measure up- or crosswind slope; if the
wind speed changes and e.g. creates more ripples, the brightness of the light sources can be
increased to also resolve smaller structures.
4.1.2 The Aeolotron Wind Wave Facility
The laboratory RSSG setup was installed at the Aeolotron wind wave facility for test measurements and calibration. Figure 4.6 shows a drawing of the facility. The inner radius of the
annular water channel is 4.34 m, the channel width is 62 cm. The water height is adjustable,
it is 100 cm during normal operation.
The waves in the Aeolotron can usually be described in the deep water wave approximation
(see 2.2.1). The deep water approximation is valid as long as the water depth is more than
47
4 Setup and Simulation
Figure 4.5: Schematic of the lab/field setup.
48
4.2 Image Simulation
Figure 4.6: The Aeolotron wind wave facility, the largest active annular wind wave tank. Inner
radius: 4.34 m. Channel width: 62 cm (from Richter, 2009).
28 % of the wavelength, which is corresponding to λ ≈ 3.60 m in the Aeolotron. At the highest
wind speeds, wavelengths can reach this range, the deep water approximation thus cannot
completely describe the wave field. The longest waves begin to “see” the bottom of the water
channel which increases wave breaking and limits the further growth of the waves.
Figure 4.7 show an illustration of the test setup with the laboratory RSSG. The mirror is
needed to elongate the optical path between water surface and RSSG cameras. The distance
between the cameras and the water surface is approximately 4.9 m. It was chosen to mimic the
conditions of field experiments on research vessels. A glass window was installed in the ceiling
of the Aeolotron to avoid disturbances of the wind and wave field and to allow simultaneous
gas exchange and wave statistics measurements.
4.2 Image Simulation
Before a decision was made on the final design of the new RSSG, some properties of the
planned system were simulated. A small ray tracing script was developed that can simulate
the reflection images for given stereo camera setup parameters (relative camera positions,
including stereo base length and camera tilt) and light source size and orientation. It is
capable to simulate reflections from an arbitrary surface, provided that a two-dimensional
49
4 Setup and Simulation
Figure 4.7: The RSSG installed at the Aeolotron. The illustration is not drawn to scale.
height map as well as two slope component maps are given. It accounts for the directional
radiation characteristic and the extension of the light sources as well as the finite size of the
aperture of the camera. The script traces light rays from the known light source positions to
the water surface and determines, using the reflection condition, whether they are reflected
into the camera aperture or not. The grid on the water surface can be selected with arbitrary
precision depending on the desired application.
4.2.1 Consistency Check
A simulated sample image is presented in figure 4.8. It shows the reflection of the light
source (consisting of 90 single LEDs) from a flat water surface in 6 m distance, as well as
an actual image acquired with the RSSG under similar conditions. The images look alike,
demonstrating the correct operation of the simulation tool. In the real image, the brightness
of the individual LEDs seems to vary. This is mostly due to inhomogeneities in the LED
directional characteristic (see section 4.3.1) and due to imperfect alignment of the LEDs in
the light source aluminum frame.
4.2.2 Curvature Simulation
The curvature of the water surface produces lens effects and leads to brightness variations in
the reflections (see figure 4.9). Negative curvature of the water surface defocuses an incident
50
4.2 Image Simulation
Figure 4.8: Left: Simulated image for flat water surface in 5.5 m distance.
Right: Actual image of flat water surface at Aeolotron in about the same distance for
comparison. The simulated image agrees well with the actual image.
η‘‘(x) < 0
η‘‘(x) = 0
η‘‘(x) > 0
Figure 4.9: Lens effects due to surface curvature: A light beam that is reflected at a slightly curved
surface is focused or defocused.
51
4 Setup and Simulation
Figure 4.10: The simulated dependence of speckle brightness on surface curvature. Note the wide
range of brightnesses that occur.
parallel light beam, which reduces speckle intensity. Positive curvature focuses a parallel
beam. For very low positive curvatures, speckle intensity can be increased in the images
due to this focusing. At higher curvatures however, the focal point lies close to the surface
and far from the camera aperture. Behind the focal point, the rays are diverging and the
speckle intensity in the images is reduced. This is a problem at higher wind speeds, when the
water surface exhibits many turbulent regions and parasitic capillary waves. The reflecting
patches here are small and can have high curvature. To investigate the influence of curvature
on the brightness of reflections in the image, curved water surfaces were simulated. In the
simulation, a surface was used that is shaped like a planoconvex lens floating on the water
in 6 m distance, the lens radius was varied from 5 mm to 500 mm. Figure 4.10 shows the
result of the simulations. The reflected brightness is clearly proportional to R2 , which seems
reasonable, since brightness depends on the area from which light can be reflected into the
camera.
If we assume sinusoidal waves on the water surface, the curvature of the surface is
∂2η
= −ak 2 sin(kx),
∂x2
∂2η
1
≈ .
2
∂x
R
(4.1)
The RSSG “sees” points on the surface where the slope is close to zero, basically the maxima
and minima (and saddle points) of the surface. The absolute
q value of the curvature is at
1
maximum at these points (for sinusoidal waves). Thus k = aR
. A curvature radius of 5 mm
is, assuming an amplitude of the order of 1 mm, equivalent to a wavenumber of the order
k = 450 rad
m , while a curvature radius of 500 mm corresponds to a wavenumber of the order
k = 4.5 rad
m (assuming an amplitude of the order of 10 cm). These wavenumbers are well within
52
4.3 Calibration of the RSSG
Figure 4.11: Left: Using multiple light sources at a specular reflecting surface cannot moderate
inhomogeneities in the radiation characteristic efficiently.
Right: At a surface patch, only light coming from a small solid angle is reflected into
the camera.
the limits of observable waves. Surface curvature leads to a high dynamic range of speckle
brightness, which requires adaptive illumination brightness. At low wind speeds, when surface
curvature is generally low, the brightness is reduced to prevent oversaturation of the images.
At higher wind speeds, the brightness has to be increased to resolve high curvature reflections.
This is possible because practically all reflections are coming from parasitic capillaries and
other high curvature regions and high intensity reflections from relatively plane patches are
unlikely. Still, one major challenge in designing the RSSG was to build sufficiently bright
light sources to resolve small capillary waves.
4.3 Calibration of the RSSG
4.3.1 Illumination
Inhomogeneities
The RSSG derives statistics of the water surface from statistics of the speckle distribution
in the images. Inhomogeneous illumination of the RSSG footprint leads to biased results for
the speckle distribution that will affect the derived wave statistics. To achieve homogeneous
illumination of a Lambertian surface, a large number of spatially distributed light sources can
be used. The situation is more complex at a specularly reflecting surface. Figure 4.11 (left
side) illustrates the problem. If the reflecting patch on the surface is sufficiently small, for a
given surface slope only light coming from a single position is reflected into the camera, in
this case, an extension of the light source is futile. The finite size of the aperture of the lens,
however, weakens this condition, the area from which light is reflected into the camera for a
given position and slope is the size of the aperture.
53
4 Setup and Simulation
modified after: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f9/LED\%2C\_5mm\%2C\_green\_\%28en\%29.svg
Figure 4.12: Inner construction of an LED: Light is emitted from the semiconductor die (red ) at the
center of the reflecting cavity (green).
A second problem for the illumination of the water surface is shown on the right side of figure
4.11: Out of the light cone emitted by a single light source, the camera “sees” only light
emitted into a small solid angle. To achieve homogeneous illumination, the light sources are
thus required to emit the same intensity in all directions – to have a constant directional
characteristic.
The RSSG light sources are built from large number of individual infrared light emitting
diodes (LEDs). Advantages of LEDs over conventional light sources include energy efficiency
as well as a relatively narrow spectrum (which is important since the spectrum of the light
sources has to be matched to a water absorption peak, see section 2.4.3). These advantages
come at the cost of an asymmetric directional characteristic. Non-homogeneities are inherent,
since the light emitting part of the diode itself is not rotation-symmetric. Figure 4.12 shows
the inner construction of a typical single LED, similar to the type used in the RSSG LED
arrays. The light emitting part, the semiconductor die, is directly connected to the anode
from below, the cathode is connected with the center of the die by a thin metal wire reaching
in from the side. This wire is breaking the rotation symmetry of the light emitter and thus
of light emission itself.
The RSSG measurement principle is relating the probability for the occurrence of a given
slope to the occurrence and brightness of reflections at only one position in the image. A
reduced emission brightness in the direction of this position will thus directly lead to an
underestimation of the probability of the corresponding slope.
To reduce the effect of inhomogeneities in the LED directional radiation characteristic in field
experiments, holographic diffusors are added to the setup. Placed in front of the LED array,
they diffuse the light coming from the LEDs while maintaining a sufficiently narrow lighted
area. Standard diffusors made from opal glass typically have an almost Lambertian radiation
characteristic, which would lead to the illumination of unwanted areas. The holographic
diffusors that are used have narrow diffusing angles that are matched to the LED radiation
half angle of 5°, and thus reduce light loss to a minimum.
54
4.3 Calibration of the RSSG
x1
x0
x2
Camera
LED
θ2
θ1
n2
n0
n1
Mirror
Figure 4.13: Schematic of the setup used to measure the directional characteristic of the LEDs.
Measuring the Directional Characteristic
If all the inhomogeneities of the light field are known, the intensity in the speckle images
can be corrected and the influence on the measured slope probabilities can be minimized.
Figure 4.13 shows a simplified one-dimensional schematic of the setup used for measuring the
characteristic. To mimic experimental conditions, the mirror (or glass pane) that reflects the
light from the LED into the camera is located at the height of the mean water level inside
the Aeolotron wind-wave facility. The mirror can be tilted in arbitrary directions using a
calibration robot with 3 step motors (Rocholz, 2008). Different mirror inclinations ni lead to
different positions xi of the LED in the image and reflect light emitted into a different solid
angle θi . The reflection brightness is extracted from the images and either the inclination
information given by the step motor controller or the position of the reflections in the image
can be used to determine the LED brightness as a function of the surface slope sx , sy .
Figure 4.14 shows the directional characteristic for a single LED. The directional characteristic
for the LED array can be obtained from superposition of the distributions of single LEDs.
4.3.2 LED Intensity Calibration
The Gardasoft LED array controller allows setting LED brightness by controlling the current.
The brightness of the LED is, however, not linearly dependent on the current. To measure the
exact dependence of LED brightness on the driving current, an Ulbricht sphere was illuminated
with one of the LEDs used in the RSSG arrays. The LEDs were pulsed with currents ranging
from 0 to 1 A, which is equivalent to a range of 0 to 1000 % of the LED current rating for
continuous use, and the emitted intensity was recorded with the RSSG cameras. The result of
55
4 Setup and Simulation
Figure 4.14: Directional characteristic of a single LED. The dip is likely caused by the cathode wire,
see figure 4.12.
this calibration is plotted in figure 4.15. Clearly, for higher currents the curve is significantly
deviating from a linear characteristic. If this were not accounted for, reflection brightness
would be underestimated in high wind speed conditions.
4.3.3 Stereo Calibration
Stereo images contain information about object distance, coded in parallax magnitude and
orientation. In order to convert parallax into distance, the dependence of parallax on distance
needs to determined. This was done by geometric considerations in section 3.3, under the
assumption that the exact geometry of the stereo setup is known. In the Aeolotron however,
the distance between the camera and the mean water level that is used as the reference
height Z0 (see 3.3) cannot be measured accurately. The distance can, on the other hand,
be determined with a two-point measurement: Equation (3.18) gives the water height as
a function parallax p, stereo reference height Z0 , stereo base b, focal length f and image
position of the reflection u. The parallax can be determined for two different water heights in
the Aeolotron Z1 and Z1 + ∆Z; the difference ∆Z is easily measured. With these two data
points, the stereo reference height can be determined from equation (3.18).
To reduce errors in the measurement, longer data series were recorded. The cameras were
aligned so that the images overlapped at (i.e. the stereo reference height was equivalent to)
an Aeolotron water height of 605 mm. The water height was varied between 1000 mm and
300 mm and the parallax was determined for a number of water heights. The procedure was
repeated for a stereo reference height equivalent to a water height of 990 mm. The black
crosses in figure 4.16 are the determined parallaxes at the corresponding water heights. The
green lines are fits of the parallax-height function (3.14), with the stereo reference height as
a fit parameter. Table 4.3 summarizes the fit results. The difference in the determined stereo
56
4.3 Calibration of the RSSG
Figure 4.15: The brightness-current dependency of the OSRAM SFH 4545 LEDs.
Figure 4.16: Results from two stereo calibration runs. The reference height was set to water levels
of 605 mm (top) and 990 mm (bottom).
57
4 Setup and Simulation
run 1
run 2
difference
water height [mm]
990
605
385
determined reference height [mm]
4872.9
5257.9
385.0
Table 4.3: Results for the experimental determination of the camera-water distance at the Aeolotron.
reference heights is equal to the difference in the Aeolotron water heights. An important result
is that the distance of the cameras to the mean water level at 100 cm water height, that is
the water height usually used in gas exchange experiments in the Aeolotron is 4.862 m. This
value is used for the calibration of the slope measurements.
58
5 Data Evaluation
Digital images can be described as M × N matrices G, where M is the number of pixels in the
y-direction and N is the number of pixels in the x-direction. The entries gij of such an image
G are commonly named gray values. In raw images, gray values are positive integers and their
range is determined by the resolution of the analog/digital converter of the used camera. The
converter of the RSSG cameras has a resolution (or bit depth) of 12 bits, as a consequence
gray values range between 0 and 4095. During image processing, it is more convenient to
treat gray values as floating point numbers and to allow them to become negative.
The RSSG acquires 200 speckle images per second of operation. From these images, slope
and height data can be reconstructed. Due to the huge amount of data that is recorded,
automated image processing algorithms are needed. In this section, the data evaluation
principle is explained and image processing algorithms are described.
5.1 Preprocessing During Acquisition
The raw image data acquired by the RSSG during normal operation amounts to 540 MB/s
(or about 1.8 TB/h). With today’s storage possibilities, this is not feasible for a two week
measurement campaign on a research vessel or extensive laboratory measurements. Also, since
writing data to hard drives is slow, the overall rate of image acquisition drops tremendously
if all this data needs to be saved. However, due to the special characteristics of the images,
the data size can be significantly reduced with simple image processing operations that can
be performed on-line during measurements.
A flow chart of the preprocessing routine is given in figure 5.1. In a first step, artifacts from
the readout electronics of the image sensor are removed by the subtraction of a dark image.
All pixels that contain no information (i.e. background pixels) are ideally set to a gray values
of 0 by this operation. In real images, noise causes the gray values to scatter around this
value.
The information density in the reflection images is relatively low, that is, only a small fraction
of the image is covered with speckles. By definition, the background contains no information, it does not need to be saved. The separation of pixels with gray values that contain
information (i.e. pixels that belong to objects) from background pixels is called segmentation.
The segmentation is usually stored as a binary image, i.e. in the form of a matrix with entries 0 (for background pixels) and 1 (for object pixels). There are many different strategies
59
5 Data Evaluation
raw image
-
Dark correction
dark image
corrected image
1 if g > t
Segmentation
corrected image
binary mask
x
Background
removal
object image
Figure 5.1: Raw image preprocessing: After dark image correction, a global threshold is applied to
the image and background is removed.
and algorithms to determine whether a pixel belongs to an object or to the background, an
introduction is given by Jähne (2005).
In the RSSG reflection images, the bright reflections can be separated from the dark background by applying a global threshold t. This produces a binary image B with entries

1 g > t,
ij
bij =
0 g ≤ t.
ij
(5.1)
The level of the threshold has to be set sufficiently high to prevent false positive segmentations
of noisy background pixels. On the other hand, a high threshold increases the probability of
false negatives, i.e. speckle pixels with low brightness that are mistaken to be background
pixels. In the laboratory experiments described in chapter 6, the threshold was set to approximately three times the standard deviation of background noise.
The background is removed from the images by element-wise multiplication of the image with
the segmentation mask; all background pixels are thereby set to gray value 0. The resulting
object image can effectively be compressed with the lossless LZW algorithm. The basic idea of
the compression algorithm is to use dictionaries in which repeating data patterns are replaced
by a short number1 . In the preprocessed object images, most of the pixels are set to 0, so
patterns with gray values (0,0,0,0,...) will appear often. The compression can reduce the file
size by a factor greater than 20.
1
for further information see http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/tiff/TIFF6.pdf
60
5.2 Slope Statistics Reconstruction
Figure 5.2: The slope-position function for x- and y-coordinates of the image (coordinate system
is shifted so that the center pixel of the image is at 0,0). The three lines represent the
maximum, “mean”, and minimum slope that is visible at the respective image coordinates.
An effect in the x-direction is only visible in the magnified detail (middle figure), note
the different scale of the abscissa. The small angle approximation was not used to obtain
these curves.
5.2 Slope Statistics Reconstruction
5.2.1 Finite-sized Light Source
In chapter 3.2, the surface slope that is corresponding to reflections in the image was computed.
For a given water height, a unique slope can be assigned to each pixel of the image. The
probability for the occurrence of this slope is directly correlated with the occurrence of a
reflection in this pixel.
This strict condition was derived for point light sources. The RSSG, uses extended, finitesized, light sources. The slope that leads to a reflection at a certain pixel is not unique
anymore, light coming from different parts of the light source is reflected into the camera if
the surface slope is within the slope interval
"
s ± δs = s ±
δsx
δsy
#
"
=s±
Lx /2z
Ly /2z
#
,
(5.2)
where Lx and Ly are the dimensions of the light source in the respective directions. The
last identity in equation (5.2) follows from geometric considerations using the small angle
approximation for the surface tilt angle θ.
In figure 5.2, the slope range that is visible when the small Aeolotron light sources are used
is plotted. The RSSG light source dimensions are asymmetric, see figure 4.1, the extension of
the visible slope range is pronounced in the y-direction of the image only, in the x-direction
(i.e. parallel to the stereo base) it is practically negligible. As can be seen from figure 5.2, the
last identity in (5.2) that was obtained using a linear approximation is sufficient to describe
the visible slope range.
61
5 Data Evaluation
The effect of the finite-dimension light sources on the probability of reflections in the images
may be described mathematically as a convolution of the slope probability density function
p(sx , sy ) with the light source function l(sx , sy ). This convolution is described by the following
integral:
p∗ (sx , sy ) =
∞
x
p(s0x , s0y ) l(s0x − sx , s0y − sy ) ds0x ds0y ,
(5.3)
−∞
where

1 for |s | < δs and |s | < δs ,
x
x
y
y
l(sx , sy ) =
0 else.
(5.4)
Even under ideal experimental conditions (stationary wave field, infinite observation time),
the speckle distribution is not proportional to the slope PDF p(sx , sy ), but to the convoluted
p∗ (sx , sy ). The convolution kernel (the light source function l) has a size of δsx = 0.00056,
δsy = 0.0172. This size sets the limit to the resolution of the PDF measurement.
5.2.2 Probability Distribution of Small Slopes
In the Aeolotron laboratory setup, the RSSG can measure the slope component in the xdirection in the range sx = ± − 0.07, in the y-direction in the range sy = ±0.062 . For all but
the lowest wind speeds, the RSSG is imaging only a small fraction of the slope PDF which is
centered around slope zero. The general slope PDF can be described by the Cox & Munk (CM)
Gram-Charlier expansion given in equation (2.33):
p(s∗x , s∗y )
1
1
1
1 ∗2
∗2
=
exp(− (sx + sy )) 1 − c21 (s∗x 2 − 1)s∗y − c03 (s∗y 3 − 3s∗y )
2πσx σy
2
2
6
1
1
1
+ c40 (s∗x 4 − 6s∗x 2 + 3) + c22 (s∗x 2 − 1)(s∗y 2 − 1) + c04 (s∗y 4 − 6s∗y 2 + 3).
24
4
24
(5.5)
In the measurement range of the RSSG, as long the assumptions sx σx and sy σy are
fulfilled, the Gaussian in (5.5) can be approximated by a parabola (Taylor expansion up to
quadratic order):
g(sx , sy ) =
1
2πσx σy
sy 2
sx 2
1−
−
+ O(|s|3 ).
2σx 2 2σy 2
(5.6)
If equation (5.6) is used to describe the slope PDF p(sx , sy ), skewness and peakedness of the
distribution, originating in non-linear wave-wave interactions, are neglected. Looking at the
CM parametrization evaluated at zero slope,
1
p(0, 0) =
2πσx σy
2
1
1
1
1 + c40 + c04 − c22 ,
8
8
4
In the field, this range is extended by the ship’s pitch and roll.
62
(5.7)
5.2 Slope Statistics Reconstruction
Figure 5.3: Comparison of the CM Gram-Charlier expansion (up-/downwind direction, red ) and
the approximation in 5.8 (green) for wind speeds (from left to right) 1 m/s, 5 m/s, and
10 m/s.
it is obvious that peakedness terms lead to an increase of the PDF amplitude for small slopes.
The peakedness coefficients given by CM are c40 = 0.3, c04 = 0.4, and c22 = 0.12 (Cox
and Munk, 1954a), independent of wind speed3 . The peakedness term thus increases the
amplitude of p(0, 0) by 5.75 % compared to a pure Gaussian. Since the reflection probability
in the RSSG images will only be proportional to the slope PDF, the peakedness term can be
absorbed by the overall proportionality constant.
Skewness causes asymmetry of the slope PDF and leads to a shift of the maximum, away
from 0. The latter effect can be accounted for, the asymmetry of the distribution is neglected
in this approximation. The approximated PDF p̃(sx , sy ) thus becomes
1
p̃(sx , sy ) =
2πσx σy
(sx − sx,0 )2
sy 2
1−
−
.
2σx 2
2σy 2
(5.8)
In figure 5.3 the approximated PDF is compared to the CM Gram-Charlier distribution, in
the slope range that is visible to the RSSG: At very low wind speeds, σx and σy are small, the
assumptions sx σx and sy σy are no longer valid for the image borders and deviations of
the approximated PDF increase. At higher wind speeds, the influence of distribution skewness
increases and the fit quality decreases.
3
The Cox-Munk-parametrization was obtained from fitting ocean data and it is doubtful if it can describe
laboratory data from the Aeolotron. However, in this approximation, a peakedness correction that is not
dependent on wind speed is assumed, then the exact magnitude of the correction is irrelevant.
63
5 Data Evaluation
5.2.3 Extraction of the Mean Square Slope
In equation (5.3) the effect of the finite size of the light source on the relation between the
slope PDF and the reflection PDF was described by a convolution. For the approximated
PDF from equation (5.8), the convolution integral becomes:
p∗ (sx , sy ) =
∞
x
p̃(s0x , s0y ) l(s0x − sx , s0y − sy ) ds0x ds0y
−∞
=
s+δs
x
(s0x − s0x,0 )2
s0y 2
1
1−
−
ds0 ds0
2πσx σy
2σx 2
2σy 2 x y
(5.9)
s−δs
2δsx δsy
=
πσx σy
s2y
δs2y
(sx − sx,0 )2
δs2x
1−
−
−
−
2σx2
2σy2 6σx2 6σy2
!
Since the cubic terms all cancel out, the resulting p∗ (sx , sy ) is still a parabola, which is reasonable, since the extended (homogeneous) light source should only spread out and smoothen
the distribution. Ideally, i.e. for infinite observation time and stationary conditions, the gray
value distribution in the images should be proportional to p∗ (sx , sy ).
To reduce the statistical error (which is inevitable for finite observation times), it is desirable
to average the gray value distribution over a larger portion of the image. Mathematically this
is equivalent to integrating p∗ (sx , sy ) over the desired slope range. In the sy -direction this
yields
Z
sy,2
px (sx ) =
p∗ (sx , sy )dsy
sy,1
"
!
#
(s3y,2 − s3y,1 )
δs2y
(sx − sx,0 )2
2δsx δsy
δs2x
(sy,2 − sy,1 ) 1 −
− 2− 2 −
=
πσx σy
2σx2
6σx
6σy
6σy2
(5.10)
while in the sx -direction it gives
Z
sx,2
py (sy ) =
p∗ (sx , sy )dsx
sx,1
"
!
#
s2x,0
sx,0 (s2x,2 − s2x,1 ) (s3x,2 − s3x,1 )
s2y
δs2y
2δsx δsy
δs2x
(sx,2 − sx,1 ) 1 − 2 − 2 − 2 − 2 +
−
=
πσx σy
2σy
2σx
6σx
6σy
2σx2
6σx2
(5.11)
Some simplifications to these distributions can be made with reasonable approximations. First
of all, since sx/y,1/2 1, s3x/y,1/2 is very small and the first term in the brackets of both (5.10)
and (5.11) can be neglected. Furthermore, the second term in (5.11) vanishes identically as
long as a symmetric interval is used in the integration.
There are several strategies to extract the mean square slope from this distribution, two of
which will be presented in the following paragraphs.
64
5.2 Slope Statistics Reconstruction
Mean Gray Value
Integrating (5.11) in the sy -direction, which is, together with the integration in (5.11), equivalent to averaging over all the gray values in two-dimensional region of the image, and applying
approximations equivalent to those described above, one gets4
2δsx δsy ∆sx ∆sy
G=
πσx σy
s2x,0
δs2y
δs2
1 − 2 − x2 − 2
2σx
6σx
6σy
!
(5.12)
.
If all but the last of the terms in the brackets can be neglected, then G ∝
1
σx σy
from which the
mean square slope can be estimated. The second and third term in (5.12) are consequences
2 , they can be neglected. In
of the finite size of the light source. As long as δs2x/y 6σx/y
the critical y-direction, for the small light source in the Aeolotron setup, δsy = 0.017. Even
at near zero wind speed, rms slope is of the order σx/y ≈ 0.03 (Bréon and Henriot, 2006;
Cox and Munk, 1954b), thus the approximation is reasonable and the error introduced by
neglecting the term should be small. The dimension of the light source in the x-direction is
negligible. The first term in (5.12) is a consequence of the non-linear wave-wave interaction
and the skewness5 of the slope PDF. At low wind speeds, the shift of the maximum due to
distribution peakedness that is modeled with sx,0 is near zero and experimentally it is found
(Bréon and Henriot, 2006), that sx,0 increases slower than σx , so s2x,0 is negligible to a good
approximation.
Under these approximations, the mean gray value of the image is proportional to the product
of the root mean square (rms) slope components G ∝
1
σx σy .
Writing :=
σx
σy ,
the mean square
slope can be obtain from the rms component product using
1
σx σy = σx2
and σx σy = σy2 ,
(5.13)
so that the total mean square slope is
1
+ 1/
σ 2 = σx2 + σy2 = ( + )σx σy ∝
.
G
(5.14)
The value of + 1/ is experimentally found to be almost independent of wind speed both in
ocean measurements and only slightly dependent on wind speed in laboratory measurements
(see figures 5.4,5.5). Thus, at least relative values for σ 2 can be derived from the mean gray
value to a good approximation.
This last approximation can be avoided if not only the mean gray value of the image is used,
but also the distribution of the gray values is taken into account. This approach is described
in the next section.
4
5
Here, ∆sx/y = (sx/y,2 − sx/y,1 ).
The skewness is only modeled with this shift of the maximum, since the approximated PDF used here is
symmetric about its maximum.
65
5 Data Evaluation
Figure 5.4: The dependence of + 1/ on wind speed U . Data is from Cox and Munk (1954b) (both
clean and slick parametrizations), Hughes et al. (1977), and Bréon and Henriot (2006).
Clearly, the factor is almost independent of wind speed for all parametrizations.
3.5
3
ε + 1/ε
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
1
2
3
Uref [m/s]
4
5
6
Figure 5.5: The dependence of + 1/ on wind speed U . Data from CISG measurements at the
Aeolotron wind wave facility, Rocholz (2010).
66
5.2 Slope Statistics Reconstruction
Fitting the Curvature
Equation (5.10) describes the distribution of gray values that is obtained by averaging over the
y-coordinate of the image. By fitting a parabola of the form a0 (x−x0 )2 +a1 to this distribution,
the fitting parameters a0 and a1 can be used to extract both rms slope components and thus
the mean square slope:
δsx δsy ∆sy
2δsx δsy ∆sy
px (sx ) = −
(sx − sx,0 )2 +
3
πσx σy
πσx σy
a0 = −
a1 =
δs2y
δs2
1 − x2 − 2
2σx
2σy
δsx δsy ∆sy 1
,
π
σx3 σy
2δsx δsy ∆sy
πσx σy
1−
δs2y
δs2x
−
2σx2 2σy2
!
,
(5.15)
!
By making the same assumptions as in the preceding section, the mean square slope can be
extracted from a1 (which is the amplitude of the maximum of the parabola at x0 ). The s2x,0
term from (5.12) does not appear here, so in theory this extraction should be more accurate.
In practice however, statistical noise is suppressed more efficiently when integrating over both
directions, favoring the approach described in the last section. With 1/σx σy known, the xcomponent of the mean square slope, σx2 can easily be determined from a0 , then of course also
σy and the mean square slope can be computed without making any assumptions on +1/.
There is another way of determining σx from the two coefficients. Without making any further
approximations and thus including the terms reflecting the finite dimension of the light source,
the (nonlinear) equation system of the last two lines in (5.15) can be solved numerically to
directly yield σx and σy .
It is important to keep in mind that for this approach to work it is critical that the gray
value distribution in the image depends only on reflection probability. This requires that the
illumination is homogeneous and vignetting does not occur. The values for σx and σy rely
heavily on the extrapolation of the PDF to higher slope values and are not directly computed
from measurement data.
5.2.4 Implementation of the image processing algorithm
For the evaluation of the test measurements at the Aeolotron, an algorithm using the mean
gray value method described above was implemented. The motivation for using this approach
is the reduced sensitivity to inhomogeneities of the illumination. The light source that will be
used in future field experiments has added diffusors which remove most inhomogeneities (see
section 4.1). This will allow the application of the more precise curvature fitting method.
A flow chart of the image processing algorithm used to evaluate the data from the Aeolotron
test experiments with the small light source is shown in figure 5.6. Each image sequence
consisting of 100 images taken in 1 second is summed up over the time coordinate. The
67
5 Data Evaluation
image series
Σ
Sum & mean
average image
÷
Normalize
brightness
brightness-current
characteristic
normalized image
Correct LED
inhomogeneities
÷
LED directional
characteristic
reflection pdf
Σ
Sum & mean
G~
1
σx σy
Figure 5.6: The process of slope reconstruction from reflection images.
brightness of the resulting average image needs to be normalized, since images are acquired
with changing illumination brightness to ensure optimum saturation of the images at all wind
speeds. The normalization factor for the brightness can be obtained from the brightnesscurrent characteristic in 4.15. The image gray values are divided by the factor corresponding to
the light source current used during image acquisition, and are thus normalized to a current of
0.1 A (which is the LED current rating for continuous use). Inhomogeneities in the directional
characteristic can in theory be corrected by element-wise division of the normalized image
with the correction image that was obtained from the calibration measurements described
in section 4.3. Finally, the average of the corrected image gray values is determined. Only
relative measurements are possible with this approach, a calibration is done by simultaneous
measurement of the mean square slope with the CISG.
5.3 Wave Height Evaluation
5.3.1 Parallax Determination
To reconstruct the water height, the stereo parallax needs to be determined for each reflection.
An elegant way to do this is offered by Fourier analysis.
68
5.3 Wave Height Evaluation
Instead of describing an image by its gray values in position space, one can equivalently
describe it in terms of wavenumbers in frequency space. The frequency space representation
is obtained from the position space representation by applying the Fourier transform (FT)
∞
x
ĝ(k) =
(5.16)
g(x) exp(−2πk · x)dx
−∞
The inverse Fourier transformation, which transforms an image from frequency space to an
image in position space, is given by
∞
x
g(x) =
(5.17)
ĝ(k) exp(2πk · x)dx.
−∞
Accounting for pixel discretization, the FT alters to
ĝu,v
M −1 N −1
2πmu
2πnv
1 X X
gm,n exp −
exp −
,
=
MN
M
N
(5.18)
m=0 n=0
and similarly for the inverse FT. For further information including some mathematical prerequisites, the reader is referred to Jähne (2005).
Consider the product of the Fourier transforms of two images6 , g1 (x) and g2 (x0 )
ĝ1 (k)ĝ2∗ (k) =
∞
x
g1 (x) exp(−2πk · x)dx
−∞
∞
x
g2 (x0 ) exp(−2πk · x0 )dx0 .
(5.19)
−∞
If the only difference in the two images is a global shift ∆x (e.g. a stereo parallax), so that
g2 (x0 ) = g2 (x + ∆x) = g1 (x), equation (5.19) can be rewritten
ĝ1 (k)ĝ2∗ (k) =
∞
x
g1 (x) exp(−2πk · x)dx
−∞
= exp(−2πk · ∆x)
∞
x
g2 (x + ∆x) exp(2πk · (x + ∆x))dx
−∞
∞
x
g1 (x) exp(−2πk · x)dx
−∞
∞
x
g1 (x) exp(2πk · x)dx
(5.20)
−∞
= exp(−2πk · ∆x) ĝ1 (k)ĝ1∗ (k)
= exp(−2πk · ∆x) |ĝ1 (k)|2 .
The global shift in gray values in image 2 with respect to image 1 translates into a global
complex phase factor in Fourier space. Dividing (5.20) by |ĝ1 (k)|2 and applying the inverse
FT yields
∞
x
−∞
6
exp(−2πk · ∆x) exp(2πk · x)dk =
∞
x
exp(2πk · (x − ∆x))dk = δ(x − ∆x).
(5.21)
−∞
To simplify the equations, the gray value distribution is treated as a continuous function of x here, quantization effects are discussed later.
69
5 Data Evaluation
left ROI
right ROI
g1(x,y)
g2(x,y)
^
g1(k1,k2)
^
g2(k1,k2)
Fourier transform
x C.C.
x C.C.
Complex multiplication
^^
g1g*2
^ 2
|g
|
2
÷
Isolate global phase
water elevation
^^ ^ 2
g1g*/
|g2|
2
Height-parallax
function
Inverse
Fourier transform
Parallax
parallax image
Detect peak
position
Figure 5.7: Flow chart of the height reconstruction algorithm.
The resulting image has a sharp peak at the coordinates of the shift between the images. Since
images are noisy and quantized both in position and frequency space, and since the parallax
is not an integer in general, the peak covers multiple pixels. The gray value distribution of the
peak can be used for detecting the peak position with subpixel accuracy, e.g. by determining
its “center of gravity”. The same argumentation can be applied to regions of interest cut out
of the images. This way, the parallax can be computed for each reflection.
5.3.2 Implementation of the Image Processing Algorithm
A schematic of the complete height reconstruction algorithm is given in figure 5.7. After the
selection of a suitable region of interest (ROI) (i.e. an image segment that is containing a
reflection) in the image, Fourier transformations are computed for both left and right image
ROIs. The FT of the left image is multiplied with the complex conjugate (C.C.) of the FT
of the right image to obtain (5.20), while the FT of the right image is multiplied with its
own complex conjugate to obtain the square of the absolute value. Then, by dividing the left
by the right the global phase factor is isolated. An inverse Fourier transformation is applied
and the center of gravity of the resulting peak is computed. The peak position is identical to
the parallax of the contents of the region of interest. With the height-parallax function from
section 3.3 the corresponding water elevation can be determined. This algorithm was used to
evaluate the stereo calibration measurements described in section 4.3.
70
6 Results
The RSSG was tested at the Aeolotron during a gas exchange measurement campaign in the
spring of 2010. For the gas exchange experiments, it was necessary to continuously increase
or decrease the wind speed according to figure 6.1. The RSSG was continuously acquiring
data; the datasets were then classified by the wind speed during acquisition and grouped into
wind speed bins with a width of 0.2 m/s.
6.1 Sample Images
Figure 6.2 shows 3 stereo images that were acquired at the Aeolotron. These are false color
images, the left image gray values are shown in green, those of the right image in red. In the
yellow areas, reflections in both images overlap. The footprint at the water surface is about
55 x 50 cm.
Different stages of the wave field development are readily observable: At low wind speeds
(upper image, U = 1.6 m/s), the water surface is relatively smooth and a small number of
reflections are visible. Most of the reflections are extended in the y-direction. Two effects
contribute to this: Firstly, the waves are approximately plane waves, propagating in the xdirection, and secondly, the light source is extended in the y-direction. At medium wind
speeds (middle image, U = 2.9 m/s), many “ripples” (capillary waves) appear on the water
surface. The number of reflections increases, at the same time the single reflections become
smaller. A structure with interchanging patches with many speckles and patches with almost
no speckles evolves. At at wind speed of U = 5.4 m/s (lower image), this structure is more
pronounced. The darker patches belong to the windward side of short gravity waves (with
a wavelength of 15-20 cm). The brighter patches correspond to the leeward side of the short
gravity waves, where many reflections are visible, due to parasitic capillaries.
6.2 Mean Square Slope
Figure 6.3 shows the dependence of the mean square slope (mss) on wind speed, as measured
with the color imaging slope gauge (Rocholz, 2010). The dependence of the mss on wind
speed is linear, but with a change in the slope at 3.5 m/s, where the slope approximately
doubles. This coincides with the onset of the breaking of short gravity waves.
71
6 Results
Figure 6.1: Time series of the reference wind speed Uref during the Aeolotron test measurements,
(May 4, 2010).
Figure 6.4 shows the evaluation of the RSSG data. The ‘mean gray value’ method, described in
section 5.2, was used to obtain the factor1 G that is proportional to
1
.
σ2
The wind dependence
is similar to that obtained in the reference measurement with the ISG. The change in the slope
of the linear fit occurs at the same wind speed, however, the slope triples at the transition,
instead of doubling as it does in the CISG data. By scaling the slope of the linear fit for low
wind speeds to that of the respective fit for the ISG data, the two data sets can be compared
directly. In figure 6.5 the scaled RSSG data (blue) is plotted together with the CISG mss
data (red). The two data sets coincide for wind speeds up to 3 m/s, at higher wind speeds,
the RSSG overestimates the mean square slope.
The overestimation of the mss is caused by an underestimation of the mean gray value in the
images. A possible cause for this underestimation is the segmentation in data preprocessing.
The threshold was set to be three times the standard deviation of the background noise level.
At high wind speeds, a significant number of reflections may have a brightness below this
threshold, these speckles are “cut out” in the segmentation process.
6.3 The Effect of Surfactants
To study the effect of surface films on the wave field, a soluble surfactant (Triton X-100 ) was
added to the water. All other environmental conditions were held constant, and the wind was
varied according to the same scheme (see figure 6.1). Data from the measurements with clean
1
G is the mean gray value of the image (after preprocessing).
72
6.3 The Effect of Surfactants
Figure 6.2: False color sample stereo images from the Aeolotron measurements. The wind is blowing
from right to left at wind speeds (from top to bottom) 1.6 m/s, 2.9 m/s, and 5.4 m/s.
The left camera is shown in green, the right camera in red. In the yellow areas, the two
camera images overlap. The footprint at the water surface is 50 x 45 cm.
73
6 Results
0.08
0.07
0.06
mss
0.05
y(x) = a x + b
a = 0.010236
b = −0.0047084
y(x) = a x + b
a = 0.019937
b = −0.038481
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0
1
2
3
Uref [m/s]
4
5
6
Figure 6.3: The dependence of the mean square slope on wind speed, measured at the Aeolotron
with the CISG.
3
2.5
1/G [a.u.]
2
y(x) = a x + b
a = 0.23681
b = −0.24338
y(x) = a x + b
a = 0.78541
b = −2.1092
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
1
2
3
Uref [m/s]
4
5
6
Figure 6.4: The dependence of the factor 1/G, determined from RSSG data, on wind speed. The
factor is proportional to the mean square slope, according to equation (5.14).
74
6.4 Slope Probability Density Function
Figure 6.5: Comparison of the mss data sets obtained by the CISG (red) and the RSSG (blue). For
low wind speeds the RSSG data coincides with the reference data from the CISG, at
higher wind speeds the RSSG overestimates the mss.
water and with the surfactant are shown in figure 6.6. The 1/G factor that is proportional to
the mean square slope, according to section 5.2.3, is shown for both clean water (black) and
the water with added surfactant (red). The development of the wave field is clearly suppressed
by the surfactant below a wind speed of 6 m/s. At higher wind speeds, the surface film breaks
up, and the wave field begins to evolve. At wind speeds around 10 m/s the surfactant has no
significant effect on the mean square slope.
6.4 Slope Probability Density Function
The CISG can determine the slope PDF in a range of sx/y = ±1.0. Figure 6.7 shows the slope
PDF in this range at three different wind speeds. With increasing wind speed, higher slopes
are more probable and the distribution is widened. The distributions qualitatively agree with
those given by Balschbach (2000).
The RSSG can only determine the slope distribution for very small slopes in the range sx/y =
±0.05. The comparison of the measured slope PDFs is thus limited to this range. In figure
6.8, the 2D slope distributions measured by the RSSG and CISG are compared at low wind
speeds. Although they exhibit a similar overall trend, significant differences are visible. The
RSSG PDF is decreasing much faster towards the boundary of the measurable slope range.
This is most likely due to inhomogeneous illumination. The illumination intensity is known to
decrease towards the borders of the field of view of the camera because of the narrow radiation
75
6 Results
Figure 6.6: The development of the wave field is effectively suppressed by the presence of a surface
film (Triton X-100) on the water surface (red data points). The reference data for the
clean water surface (black) are from the same series as in 6.5.
Figure 6.7: The 2D slope PDF measured with the CISG at (from left to right) 1.2 m/s, 5.2 m/s, and
10.2 m/s wind speed. z-axis: arbitrary scaling of the slope probability.
76
6.4 Slope Probability Density Function
Uref = 1.2 m/s
5
x 10
15
4
3.5
10
3
2.5
5
2
1.5
0
0.05
1
0.05
0.05
0
sy
0.05
0
0
−0.05
−0.05
sy
sx
0
−0.05
−0.05
sx
Uref = 3.0 m/s
4
x 10
2
12
11
1.5
10
1
9
0.5
8
0
0.05
7
0.05
0.05
0
sy
0
−0.05
−0.05
sx
0.05
0
sy
0
−0.05
−0.05
sx
Figure 6.8: Comparison of the slope PDF measured with the RSSG (left) and CISG (right) at low
wind speeds. z-axis: arbitrary scaling of the slope probability.
angle (see section 4.3.1). The intensity correction matrix described in section 4.3.1 was found
to be insufficient and not used in the data evaluation.
At higher wind speeds (figure 6.9), the differences between the CISG and RSSG distributions
are more pronounced. In the CISG distributions (right side), a shift of the maximum in
the crosswind direction (y-direction) is visible. At high wind speeds (7.4 m/s, 10.2 m/s), the
maximum of the distribution is shifted out of the measurement range of the RSSG. This
cannot be explained with the expected distribution asymmetry (see 2.3) alone, since not
only the maximum but also the mean of the distribution is shifted. In ocean measurements,
the mean of the surface slope is zero for sufficiently long integration times. In the circular
Aeolotron, however, the centrifugal force increases the mean water height at the outer wall
and decreases it at the inner wall of the channel, leading to a mean slope other than zero. This
shift of the distribution maximum is mostly concealed by the illumination inhomogeneities in
the RSSG PDFs.
Another effect contributes to differences in the CISG and RSSG distributions: the footprint
of the CISG is an area of 19.4 cm × 14.5 cm in the center of the water channel, while the
RSSG footprint is extended almost over the full width of the channel (61 cm). Effects of the
finite size of the water channel may thus be more pronounced in the RSSG data.
A general difference in the measurement principles of the RSSG and CISG is responsible for
the different sensitivities to wave field inhomogeneities. The RSSG is measuring a single slope
at each pixel of its footprint, the slope distribution is obtained by combination of all this
information. A distinct slope distribution in a part of the footprint will thus affects a part
77
6 Results
Uref = 4.2 m/s
4
x 10
1
7
0.8
6.5
0.6
6
0.4
5.5
0.2
5
0
0.05
4.5
0.05
0.05
0
0.05
0
0
sy
−0.05
−0.05
0
sy
sx
−0.05
−0.05
sx
Uref = 5.2 m/s
4
x 10
0.5
4.5
0.4
4
0.3
0.2
3.5
0.1
0
0.05
3
0.05
0.05
0
0.05
0
0
sy
−0.05
−0.05
0
sy
sx
−0.05
−0.05
sx
Uref = 7.4 m/s
4
x 10
0.25
2.8
0.2
2.6
0.15
2.4
0.1
2.2
0.05
0
0.05
2
0.05
0.05
0
0.05
0
0
s
−0.05
−0.05
s
sx
y
0
−0.05
−0.05
sx
y
Uref = 10.2 m/s
4
x 10
0.12
1.8
0.1
1.7
0.08
0.06
1.6
0.04
1.5
0.02
0
0.05
1.4
0.05
0.05
0
0
s
y
−0.05
−0.05
sx
0.05
0
0
s
y
−0.05
−0.05
sx
Figure 6.9: Comparison of the slope PDF measured with the RSSG (left) and CISG (right) at higher
wind speeds. z-axis: arbitrary scaling of the slope probability.
78
6.5 Discussion
of the slope distribution only. This means, that inhomogeneities lead to distortions of the
measured slope PDF. The CISG on the other hand measures the whole slope distribution for
each pixel of its images. The global slope distribution is then obtained by averaging all these
distributions. Inhomogeneities in an area of the footprint will thus affect the global slope
distribution as a whole in the averaging process.
6.5 Discussion
The RSSG has been tested in a wide range of wind speeds under clean water and slick
conditions at the Aeolotron. Simultaneous reference slope PDF measurements were performed
with an CISG (Rocholz, 2010).
Mean square slope values determined by the RSSG can be calibrated with the values determined by the CISG in the range of 0 to 3 m/s (see section 6.2). At higher wind speeds, the
RSSG significantly overestimates the mean square slope. This can be attributed to insufficient
illumination brightness and the segmentation during preprocessing. The problem is strongly
correlated to the high dynamic range in speckle brightness that was simulated in section 4.2.
The high curvature of small structures like capillary waves reduces the reflection brightness by
multiple orders of magnitude, compared to a flat water surface. With the small light sources
that were used in the test experiments, the intensities of reflections coming from high curvature areas were of the same order of magnitude as background noise. Thus it was inevitable
that some reflections were cut out of the images in the segmentation process. The size of the
new larger light sources for the field measurements is almost four times the size of the small
laboratory test light sources. Since the mean gray value in the image is linearly dependent on
the light source dimensions (see section 5.2.3), speckle size and brightness can be increased to
facilitate the separation of speckles from background also at high wind speeds. For the available laboratory data, the extraction of the mean square slope by fitting the speckle brightness
distribution with a model PDF (see section 5.2.3) was unsuccessful due to the deviations in
the brightness distribution (see 6.4).
The big influence of surfactants on the measured mean square slope values (see section 6.3)
can directly be seen from figure 6.6. The damping of capillary waves reduces surface curvature,
the intensity of the speckles is strongly increased. Due to the large effect of surfactants on the
mean gray value of the speckle images, surface slicks can be detected reliably by the RSSG.
In field experiments, this is valuable information for gas and heat exchange experiments.
With the RSSG mean square slope measurements, slick conditions can be distinguished from
no-slick conditions. This allows conditional sampling of the exchange rates.
The partial slope probability distributions measured with the RSSG are compared to those
measured with the CISG in section 6.4. Despite the similar trends that are observable,
significant deviations occur. The probability for slopes near the maximum of the measurement
range of the RSSG is underestimated and the shift of the distribution maximum due to the
79
6 Results
centrifugal force (see section 6.4) that is visible in the CISG distributions is not measured
by the RSSG. The slope measurement principle of the RSSG is based on the assumption of
a homogeneous wave field in the footprint on the water surface is made. Information from
the whole image has to be combined to yield a single PDF (see 3.2). However, the finite
dimensions of the circular Aeolotron wind-wave facility lead to inhomogeneous conditions,
varying over the RSSG footprint and distortions of the PDF are inevitable. The CISG is
measuring the slope PDF in the center of the facility only, its footprint is much smaller.
Inhomogeneities do not affect the CISG PDFs because the CISG can determine slope PDFs
for single pixels which then are averaged to yield the global PDF. Inhomogeneities thus are
reflected equally in the PDF as a whole, not only in certain areas.
Another factor contributing to the deviations of the RSSG slope PDFs is the directional
characteristic of the LEDs. The LEDs are known to have inhomogeneities (see section 4.3)
and the intensity of emitted radiation is lower in the direction of the image borders, where
the higher slopes are measured. This leads to an additional underestimation of the higher
slope values. The correction matrix determined in the calibration could not be used on
the preprocessed experimental data. The image processing algorithm will be adapted for
future measurements, the directional characteristic correction will be performed before the
segmentation step in the preprocessing routine. Furthermore, the diffusors that are added to
the new LED arrays will reduce the effects of directional inhomogeneities.
The stereo evaluation algorithm is currently under development. In section 4.3.3 the height
reconstruction principle was shown to generally work in calibration measurements. The resolution of the images of the new RSSG is significantly improved over the earlier work of Waas
(1992) and Dieter (1998). This allows higher precision in the determination of the parallax
and thus better height resolution. The height resolution will depend on the size of the speckles, from the calibration measurements that were performed with a flat water surface it is
estimated to be ±2 mm.
Implications for Field Measurements
Some difficulties that were observed in the laboratory test experiments could be accounted
for in the development of the instrument for field measurements (see figure 4.2). The larger
light sources provide sufficient illumination brightness for higher wind speeds. In addition,
the holographic diffusors reduce directional inhomogeneities. The above mentioned difficulties
with inhomogeneities of the wave field are not expected to occur in the ocean, the wave field
in the ocean is in general homogeneous over the area of the RSSG footprint (except for the
case of partial surface slick coverage, which can readily be detected), the problems with the
finite size of the laboratory facility do not occur.
Pitch and roll of the ship will increase the slope range that is visible to the RSSG, the slope
PDF can be measured for a larger range and the mean square slope components can be
extracted by fitting the model PDF to the data. Data from the inclination sensor can be
80
6.5 Discussion
included at the beginning of the slope evaluation process. In field measurements, it is also
necessary to account for the change of the distance Z to the water surface due to pitch and roll
or larger waves. For the calibration of the slope measurements (see 3.2.4, it should be sufficient
to use the mean water height, determined globally for each stereo image pair. This eliminates
the need for a sophisticated stereo height reconstruction algorithm for slope measurements.
The algorithm presented in section 5.3 is capable of providing this information and ready to
use.
81
7 Conclusion and Outlook
7.1 Conclusion
An improved optical instrument for the measurement of surface ocean wave statistics has been
presented in this thesis. This reflective stereo slope gauge (RSSG) is capable of simultaneous
measurements of height and slope statistics of the water surface in the field.
Using a stereo camera setup and two artificial light sources, the correspondence problem at the
specular reflecting water surface can be solved (see section 3.3). Cameras and light sources are
triggered to ensure that each camera can only see reflections coming from the corresponding
light source (see section 4.1). The distance of the instrument to the reflections on the water
surface can be reconstructed from the parallax of the reflections in stereo images (see section
5.3). From this information, wave height statistics can be inferred. The water height could
be reconstructed from stereo parallax in calibration measurements (see section 4.3.3) with an
accuracy of ± 2 mm at a working distance of 4.8 m (see section 6.5).
The light sources are built from infrared LEDs. Their emission peak wavelength (940 nm) is
matched to a water absorption peak. Since the penetration depth is only 3.4 cm, upwelling
light can be effectively suppressed (see section 2.4.3).
The probability distribution of surface slope is related to the probability distribution of the
occurrence of reflections at different image positions (see section 3.2). Slope statistics are
derived from the spatial brightness distribution in the images (see section 5.2).
A laboratory version of the instrument has been set up and characterized at the Aeolotron
wind wave facility (see section 4.1). It is shown that the RSSG can be used to acquire the
two-dimensional slope probability distribution for a slope range of ± 0.05 (see section 6.4).
However, significant deviations to reference measurements occurred. Inhomogeneities in the
illumination brightness due to the directional characteristics of the light source were identified
to be a major source of error.
The directional radiation characteristic of the LED emission was measured and a correction matrix was obtained (see section 4.3.1). The evaluation of the test experiment data
demonstrated the need for an on-line correction, that is performed prior to further image
preprocessing (see section 6.5). Another measure to homogenize the light sources is the use
of holographic diffusors (see section 4.3.1). This is already incorporated in the design of the
instrument for the field measurements.
83
7 Conclusion and Outlook
From the slope probability distributions, the mean square slope was extracted (see section
6.2). The comparison with reference measurements shows good agreement at low wind speeds.
At higher wind speeds, the RSSG systematically overestimates the mean square slope. This
can be attributed to insufficient illumination brightness. Surface curvature leads to a high
dynamic range in speckle reflection brightness (see section 4.2). At higher wind speeds, mean
speckle brightness decreases to the level of background noise and reflections are missed by the
image processing algorithms (see section 5.1), which leads to the observed overestimation of
mean square slope (see section 5.2). To approach this problem, the size of the light sources for
the ocean instrument has been increased by a factor of 4, compared to the laboratory setup
(see section 4.1).
The laboratory experiments have confirmed the ability of the RSSG to detect surface slicks
(see section 6.3). This feature will aid the data evaluation of heat exchange experiments (see
section 6.5).
7.2 Outlook
The ocean instrument is scheduled to be deployed to the Baltic Sea in June 2010. It will
accompany heat exchange measurements from aboard a research vessel.
The effect of the holographic diffusors on the directional characteristic of the light sources has
to be studied. If necessary, a correction matrix has to be obtained from further calibration
measurements.
A stereo evaluation algorithm capable of reconstructing the envelope of the wave field is
currently under development. Comparative field measurements with a polarimetric camera
are aspired to assess the accuracy of the wave field height reconstruction and slope statistics.
84
Bibliography
G. B. Airy. On tides and waves. In Encyclopaedia Metropolitana, pages 241–396. B. Fellowes,
London, 1845.
G. Balschbach.
Untersuchungen statistischer und geometrischer Eigenschaften von
Windwellen und ihrer Wechselwirkung mit der wasserseitigen Grenzschicht. Dissertation,
Institut für Umweltphysik, Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Univ. Heidelberg, 2000.
URL http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/2473/.
M. L. Banner and O. M. Phillips. On the incipient breaking of small-scale waves. Journal of
Fluid Mechanics, 65:647–656, 1974.
M. L. Banner, I. S. F. Jones, and J. C. Trinder. Wavenumber spectra of short gravity waves.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 198:321–344, 1989.
N. F. Barber. A diffraction analysis of a photograph of the sea. Nature, 164:485–485, 1949.
E. J. Bock and T. Hara. Optical measurements of ripples using a scanning laser slope gauge.
In Optics of the Air-Sea Interface, volume 1749, page 272ff, 1992. Part II: Data analysis
and interpretation from a laboratory.
J. Boussinesq. Théorie des ondes et des remous qui se propagent le long d’un canal rectangulaire horizontal, en communiquant au liquide contenu dans ce canal des vitesses sensiblement
pareilles de la surface au fond. J. Math. Pures Appl., 17 (2):55–108, 1872.
F. M. Bréon and N. Henriot. Spaceborne observations of ocean glint reflectance and modeling
of wave slope distributions. Journal of Geophysical Research (Oceans), 111:6005–+, June
2006. doi: 10.1029/2005JC003343.
B. Chapron, V. Kerbaol, D. Vandemark, and T. Elfouhaily. Importance of peakedness in sea
surface slope measurements and applications. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 105
(C7):17195–202, 2000.
L.J. Cote, J.O. Davis, W. Marks, R.J. McGough, E. Mehr, W.J. Jr. Pierson, J.F. Ropek,
G. Stephenson, and R.C. Vetter. The directional spectrum of a wind generated sea as
determined from data obtained by the stereo wave observation project. Meteorological
Papers, 2 (6):1–88, 1960.
C. Cox and W. Munk. Statistics of the sea surface derived from sun glitter. Journal of Marine
Research, 13(2):198–227, 1954a.
85
Bibliography
C. Cox and W. Munk. Slopes of the sea surface deduced from photographs of sun glitter.
Technical report, University of California, 1956.
C. S. Cox. Measurement of slopes of high-frequency wind waves. J. Marine Res., 16(3):
199–225, 1958.
Charles Cox and Walter Munk. Measurements of the roughness of the sea surface from
photographs of the sun’s glitter. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 44(11):838–850,
1954b.
J. Dieter. Analysis of Small-Scale Ocean Wind Waves by Image Sequence Analysis of Specular
Reflections. Dissertation, IWR, Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Univ. Heidelberg,
1998. URL http://d-nb.info/955455804.
E. B. Dobson. Measurements of the fine-scale structure of the sea. J.Geophys.Res., 75:2853–
2856, 1970.
M. A. Donelan and R. Wanninkhof. Gas transfer at water surfaces - conepts and issues. In
M. A. Donelan, W. M. Drennan, E. S. Saltzman, and R. Wanninkhof, editors, Gas Transfer
at Water Surfaces. American Geophysical Union, 2002.
M. A. Donelan, J. Hamilton, and W. H. Hui. Directional spectra of wind-generated waves.
Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 315:509–562, September 1985.
F.Y. Edgeworth. The generalised law of error, or law of great numbers. Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society, 69:497–530, 1906.
C. B. Field and M. R. Raupach. The Global Carbon Cycle : Integrating Humans, Climate,
and the Natural World. Island Press, Washington D.C., 2004.
D. Fuß.
Kombinierte Höhen- und Neigungsmessung von winderzeugten Wasserwellen
am Heidelberger Aeolotron.
Physik und Astronomie,
Dissertation, Institut für Umweltphysik, Fakultät für
Univ. Heidelberg,
Heidelberg,
Germany,
2004.
URL
http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/4820.
E. Hecht. Optics. Addison Wesley, 4th edition, 2001.
H. Hühnerfuss, W. Walter, P. Lange, and W. Alpers.
Attenuation of wind waves by
monomolecular sea slicks and the Marangoni effect. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92:
3961–3963, 1987.
L. H. Holthuijsen. Observations of the directional distribution of ocean-wave energy in fetchlimited conditions. J.Phys.Oceanogr., 13:191–207, 1983a.
L. H. Holthuijsen. Stereophotography of ocean waves. Applied Ocean Research, 5:204–209,
1983b.
86
Bibliography
B. A. Hughes, R. W. Grant, and R. W. Chappell. A fast response surface-wave slope meter
and measured wind-wave moments. Deep-Sea Res., 24:1211–1223, 1977.
J. D. Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley, 3rd edition, 1998.
B. Jähne. Zur Parametrisierung des Gasaustauschs mit Hilfe von Laborexperimenten. Dissertation, Institut für Umweltphysik, Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Univ. Heidelberg,
1980. URL http://d-nb.info/810123614. IUP D-145.
B. Jähne. On the transfer processes at a free air-water interface. Habilitation thesis, Institut
für Umweltphysik, Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Univ. Heidelberg, 1985. IUP D200.
B. Jähne. Digitale Bildverarbeitung. Springer, Berlin, 6 edition, 2005. doi: 10.1007/b138991.
B. Jähne. Investigating the mechanisms of air-water gas transfer by quantitative imaging
techniques: history, current progress and remaining challenges. In 6th Int. Symp. Gas
Transfer at Water Surfaces, Kyoto, May 17–21, 2010, 2010. keynote talk.
B. Jähne and K. Riemer. Two-dimensional wave number spectra of small-scale water surface
waves. J. Geophys. Res., 95(C7):11531–11646, 1990. doi: 10.1029/JC095iC07p11531.
B. Jähne, K. O. Münnich, and U. Siegenthaler. Measurements of gas exchange and momentum
transfer in a circular wind-water tunnel. Tellus, 31:321–329, 1979.
B. Jähne, K. O. Münnich, R. Bösinger, A. Dutzi, W. Huber, and P. Libner. On the parameters influencing air-water gas exchange. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92:1937–1950,
February 1987. doi: 10.1029/JC092iC02p01937.
B. Jähne, J. Klinke, and S. Waas. Imaging of short ocean wind waves: a critical theoretical
review. J.Opt.Soc.Am., 11:2197–2209, 1994. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.11.002197.
B. Jähne, M. Schmidt, and R. Rocholz. Combined optical slope/height measurements of
short wind waves: principles and calibration. Measurement Science & Technology, 16(10):
1937–1944, 2005. ISSN 0957-0233. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/16/10/008.
M. G. Kendall and A. Stuart. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 1: Distribution theory.
Griffin, London, 1977.
B. Kinsman. Wind Waves: Their Generation and Propagation on the Ocean Surface. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, 1965.
J. Klinke and B. Jähne. Measurements of short ocean waves during the mbl ari west coast
experiment. In B. Jähne and E. C. Monahan, editors, Air-water Gas Transfer, Selected
Papers from the Third International Symposium on Air–Water Gas Transfer, pages 165–
173, Hanau, 1995. Aeon.
87
Bibliography
E. Kohlschütter. Die Forschungsreise S.M.S. Planet II. Stereophotogrammetrische Aufnahmen. Annalen der Hydrographie und Maritimen Meterologie, 34:220–227, 1906.
L. Kou, D. Labrie, and P. Chylek. Refractive indices of water and ice in the 0.65–2.5 µm
spectral range. Appl. Opt., 32:3531–3540, 1993.
P. K. Kundu. Fluid Mechanics. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 4th edition, 2007.
W. Laas. Photographische Messung der Meereswellen. Zeitschr. d. Vereins Dtsch. Ingenieure,
49:S.1889 ff. S.1937 ff. und S.1976 ff., 1905.
W. Laas. Messung der Meereswellen und ihre Bedeutung für den Schiffsbau. Jahrbuch der
Schiffsbautechn. Gesellschaft, 7:S.391 ff., 1906.
W. Laas. Die photographische Messung der Meereswellen. Veröff. Inst. f. Meereskunde N. F.
Reihe A, Heft 7, 1921.
A. K. Liu, S. Martin, and R. Kwok. Tracking of ice edges and ice floes by wavelet analysis of
SAR images. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 14:1187–1198, 1997a.
Y. Liu, X.-H. Yan, W. T. Liu, and P. A. Hwang. The probability density function of ocean
surface slopes and its effects on radar backscatter. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 27:
782–797, May 1997b. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027.
M. S. Longuet-Higgins. The effect of non-linearities on statistical distributions in the theory
of sea waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 17:459–480, 1963.
M. S. Longuet-Higgins. On the skewness of sea-surface slopes. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 12:1283–1291, November 1982.
M.S. Longuet-Higgins.
sea waves.
On the joint distribution of the periods and amplitudes of
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 80:2688–2694, 1975.
URL
http://europa.agu.org/?uri=/journals/jc/JC080i018p02688.xmlview=article.
J. Larry Pezzaniti, David Chenault, Mike Roche, John Reinhardt, and Howard Schultz. Wave
slope measurement using imaging polarimetry. In Ocean Sensing and Monitoring, 2009.
doi: 10.1117/12.819031.
O. M. Phillips. The dynamics of the upper ocean. Cambridge University Press, second edition
edition, 1977.
W. J. Plant. A new interpretation of sea-surface slope probability density functions. Journal
of Geophysical Research (Oceans), 108:3295–11, 2003a. doi: 10.1029/2003JC001870.
W. J. Plant. Bound waves and sea-surface slopes. In OCEANS 2003. Proceedings, volume 4,
pages 1825–1828, 2003b.
R. M. Pope and E. S. Fry. Absorption spectrum (380 -700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating
cavity measurements. Appl Opt, 36:8710–8723, November 1997.
88
Bibliography
K. Richter. Technische Daten des Aeolotron nach dem Umbau 2007/2008. Technical report,
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, 2009.
R. Rocholz. Bildgebendes System zur simultanen Neigungs- und Höhenmessung an kleinskaligen Wind-Wasserwellen. Diplomarbeit, University of Heidelberg, 2005.
R. Rocholz. Spatiotemporal Measurement of Short Wind-Driven Water Waves. Dissertation,
Institut für Umweltphysik, Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Univ. Heidelberg, 2008.
URL http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/8897.
R. Rocholz. Calibration of the 2010-CISG Setup at the Aeolotron. Technical report, Institute
of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, 2010.
C. L. Sabine, R. A. Feely, N. Gruber, R. M. Key, K. Lee, J. L. Bullister, R. Wanninkhof, C. S.
Wong, D. W. R. Wallace, B. Tilbrook, F. J. Millero, T.-H. Peng, A. Kozyr, T. Ono, and
A. F. Rios. The ocean sink for anthropogenic CO2 . Science, 305:367–372, 2004.
A. H. Schooley. A simple optical method of measuring the statistical distribution of water
surface slopes. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 44(37), 1954.
A. Schumacher. Stereophotogrammetrische Wellenaufnahmen. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse
der Deutschen Atlantischen Expedition auf dem Forschungs- und Vermessungsschiff Meteor,
1925 - 1927, 1939.
A. Schumacher. Stereophotogrammetrische wellenaufnahmen mit schneller bildfolge. Deutsche
Hydrographische Zeitschrift, 3(1-2):78–82, 1950.
A. Schumacher. Results of exact wave measurements (by stereophotogrammetry) with special
reference to more recent theoretical investigations. In Proceedings of the NBS Semicentennial Symposium on Gravity Waves held at the NBS on June 18-20, 1951, pages 69–78,
November 1952.
J. C. Scott. An optical probe for measuring water wave slopes. Journal of Physics E Scientific
Instruments, 7:747–749, September 1974. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/7/9/021.
O. H. Shemdin, H. M. Tran, and S. C. Wu. Directional measurements of short ocean waves
with stereophotography. J.Geophys.Res., 93:13891–13901, 1988.
D. Jr Stilwell. Directional energy spectra of the sea from photographs. J.Geophys.Res., 74:
1974–1986, 1969.
G. G. Stokes. On the theory of oscillatory waves. Trans. Camb. Philos. Soc., 8:441, 1849.
G. V. Sturm and F. Y. Sorrell. Optical wave measurement technique and experimental comparison with conventional wave height probes. Appl.Opt., 12:1928–1934, 1973.
T. Takahashi, S.C. Sutherland, R. Wanninkhof, C. Sweeney, R.A. Feely, D.W. Chipman, B. Hales, G. Friederich, F. Chavez, C. Sabine, et al. Climatological mean and
89
Bibliography
decadal change in surface ocean pco2, and net sea-air co2 flux over the global oceans.
Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 56:554–577, 2009.
doi:
doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009.
V. I. Tatarskii. Multi-gaussian representation of the cox?munk distribution for slopes of
wind-driven waves. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20(11):1697?1705,
November 2003.
R. Tober, R.C. Anderson, and O. Shemdin. Laser instrument for detecting water ripple slopes.
Appl. Opt., 12:788–794, 1973.
G. R. Valenzuela. Theories for the interaction of electromagnetic and ocean waves - a review.
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 13:61–85, 1978.
S. Waas.
Entwicklung eines verfahrens zur messung kombinierter höhen- und nei-
gungsverteilungen von wasseroberflächenwellen mit stereoaufnahmen. Diplomarbeit, Institut für Umweltphysik, Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Univ. Heidelberg, 1988.
IUP D-248.
S. Waas. Entwicklung eines feldgängigen optischen Meßsystems zur stereoskopischen Messung
von Wasseroberflächenwellen. Dissertation, Institut für Umweltphysik, Fakultät für Physik
und Astronomie, Univ. Heidelberg, 1992. URL http://d-nb.info/930235711.
S. Waas and B. Jähne. Combined slope-height measurements of short wind waves: first
results from field and laboratory measurements. In L. Estep, editor, Optics of the Air-Sea
Interface: Theory and Measurements, volume 1749 of SPIE Proc., pages 295–306, 1992.
R. Wanninkhof, W. E. Asher, D. T. Ho, C. Sweeney, and W. R. McGillis. Advances in
quantifying air-sea gas exchange and environmental forcing. Annual Rev. Marine Sci., 1:
213–244, 2009. doi: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163742.
F. J. Wentz. Cox and Munk’s sea surface slope variance. Journal of Geophysical Research,
81:1607–1608, 1976. doi: 10.1029/JC081i009p01607.
J. Wu. Slope and curvature distribution of wind-disturbed water surface. Journal of the
Optical Society of America, 61:852–858, July 1971.
C. Zappa, M. Banner, H. Schultz, A. Corrada-Emmanuel, L. Wolff, and J. Yalcin. Retrieval of
short ocean wave slope using polarimetric imaging. Meas. Sci. Technol., 19:055503 (13pp),
2008.
C. J. Zappa, W. E. Asher, and A. T. Jessup. Microscale wave breaking and air-water gas
transfer. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 106(C5):9385–9391, 2001.
X. Zhang and C. S. Cox. Measuring the two-dimensional structure of a wavy water surface
optically: A surface gradient detector. Experiments in Fluids, 17:225–237, August 1994.
doi: 10.1007/BF00203041.
90
Danksagung: Ich bedanke mich herzlich bei Prof. Dr. Bernd Jähne, der diese Arbeit betreut
und überhaupt erst ermöglicht hat. Ganz besonders möchte ich ihm dafür danken, dass ich im
September 2009 an der SOLAS Open Science Conference in Barcelona teilnehmen durfte. Ein
großer Dank geht auch an Prof. Dr. Ulrich Platt für die Übernahme der Zweitkorrektur.
Des weiteren möchte ich mich bei meinen Mitarbeitern in der Windkanal-Arbeitsgruppe für
ihre Unterstützung und Hilfestellung bedanken, die mir meine Arbeit unendlich erleichterte.
Ein ganz besonderer Dank geht an Roland Rocholz, der immer ein offenes Ohr für meine
Probleme hatte und der mich mehr als einmal auf den richtigen Weg lenken konnte.
Ein großer Dank geht auch an Herrn Pfeiffer und sein Team in der Feinmechanik-Werkstatt
des IUP für die fantastische Umsetzung der Pläne für die Feld-RSSG.
Erklärung: Ich versichere, dass ich diese Arbeit selbstständig verfasst habe und keine anderen
als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe.
Heidelberg, den 15. Juni 2010
....................................
(Daniel Kiefhaber)
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertisement