Understanding and Eliminating EMI in Microcontroller Applications

Understanding and Eliminating EMI in Microcontroller Applications
National Semiconductor
Application Note 1050
Robin Getz
Bob Moeckel
August 1996
In today’s world, with increasing numbers of both fixed and
mobile electronic devices, electromagnetic compatibility
(EMC) is becoming a critical issue. Disastrous, if not annoying, results occur if a system, subsystem or component interferes with another through electromagnetic means. The
EMC problem is first explained, and then the basic theory is
presented with an explanation on how to use it to control an
EMC problem during the initial design phase. The methods
that some silicon manufacturers are using to control EMC
and how these changes affect our systems will be examined. A total system (automobile radio) will be examined in
detail to prove the effectiveness of a EMC reduced COP8TM
(8-bit microcontroller). Overall design guidelines will also be
given so that the designer can minimize EMI before it becomes a problem .
2. Undertake an educational campaign to inform users and
those who care for them about the risks of EMI and ways
to avoid it; and
3. Solicit reports of possible EMI incidents and continue to
monitor the full scope of the problem.
FDA first learned of a possible problem with motorized
wheelchairs from a complaint in June 1992. As a result, the
agency began testing sample wheelchairs in its laboratories.
Those tests, on several brands of power-driven wheelchairs
and scooters, revealed that mostÐbut not allÐof those
sampled were susceptible to interference at various radio
frequencies. In some tests, the brakes released. In others,
the wheels moved uncontrollably. Sometimes both occurred
at once. The extent to which this happens in actual use is
not known. In early 1993, FDA began inspecting facilities of
all domestic and foreign motorized wheelchair and scooter
manufacturers to gather information on the problem. The
agency reviewed warranty and complaint files and looked at
any manufacturing practices that could contribute to this
type of problem. The inspections revealed numerous complaints about erratic, unintentional wheelchair movement,
sometimes resulting in injuries. It is unclear, however, exactly what caused the chairs to move in those cases. In addition to EMI, unexpected movement can be caused by failure
of an electronic component or by user error.
In May 1993, FDA sent letters to all U.S. manufacturers asking them to provide any information they had about possible
problems with radio wave interference, including complaints, reports of injuries and studies on power-driven
wheelchairs. In July 1993, the agency alerted consumer
groups that represent wheelchair users about the possible
problem and requested similar information. An estimated
10,000 motorized wheelchairs and 50,000 motorized scooters are sold annually in this country.
ÐFDA Report, August 1994
The control and minimization of EMC is a technology that is,
out of necessity, growing rapidly. Manufacturers and regulatory agencies have made efforts to control this problem but
the issue of meeting these ever tightening specifications is
left to the system designer. EMC can no longer be a fix,
designed in at the last moment, but must be a directed effort
between the circuit designer, layout engineer, software engineer and purchaser. This paper will examine what can be
done to reduce the chance of having a product fail EMC
Electromagnetic Interference with Powered
August 26, 1994
FDA is receiving inquiries about reports that electromagnetic interference (EMI) can cause some power-driven wheelchairs and scooters to move unexpectedly. The agency has
investigated this matter and determined that EMI can cause
unexpected movement in some power-driven wheelchairs
when they are turned on. Not all brands and models of power wheelchairs and scooters have this problem. Some have
greater immunity levels than others that may protect against
EMI. Common sources of EMI include cellular phones, CB
radios, TV and radio stations, amateur (HAM) radios and
police, fire and ambulance radios.
After receiving reports of problems, FDA tested sample
wheelchairs and scooters in its laboratories and obtained
information from manufacturers and users about possible
EMI-related incidents. As a result of its review, the agency
last May asked wheelchair manufacturers to take steps to
protect powered wheelchair users from the potential hazards of EMI. FDA required all firms to clearly label wheelchairs and scooters with the immunity level, or else state
that the immunity level is not known. It also required them to
label wheelchairs and scooters to warn users of the potential hazards of EMI. The agency also asked manufacturers
1. Establish a minimum recommended immunity level of
20V per meter for all new motorized wheelchairs and
scooters. This would provide a reasonable degree of protection against the more common sources of EMI.
COP8TM is a trademark of National Semiconductor Corporation.
C1996 National Semiconductor Corporation
Understanding and Eliminating EMI in Microcontroller Applications
Understanding and
Eliminating EMI in
RRD-B30M106/Printed in U. S. A.
TABLE II. List of Designer Efforts
to Reduce EMI Emissions
2.1 The EMC World Map
Before jumping into the midst of the EMC design methods
used, it is best to gain an understanding of the problem
situation and review or learn applicable electromagnetic
(EM) theory. To begin, look at what I call the map of the
EMC world, Table I. The EMC problem is between an emission culprit and susceptible victim which are coupled
through a means, either radiation through space or conducted through wires (Figure 1) . We can map out the EMC problem cases with columns headed by radiation and conduction, and rows headed by emission and susceptibility, to get
four cases abbreviated as RE, CE, RS, CS.
TABLE I. ElectroMagnetic Compatibility Map
2.2 What Designers Do Upon A Discovery of an EMC
Typically, the first time system designers realize that they
have a RE problem is after the prototype system has been
built and evaluated. Instead of being close to market release they now find themselves applying costly and often
ineffective patches and going back into redesign. The steps
outlined in Table II are what a typical person does at this
point. First reaction is to make the printed circuit board
(PCB) trace length short or to upgrade to a higher cost PCB
with a full ground plane. Although most system companies
have experienced and good layout design rules for their
PCBs, enforcing these rules is sometimes difficult to do as
more and more components are being packed into smaller
packages on a smaller board. Layout is often subcontracted
and the designer may not have the necessary experience
and motivation, cost reduction is the goal. Next, filters (RC,
RL, or ferrite beads) are added in hopes that this may fix the
problem. Also, the crystal frequency may be reduced by
about 2x to run the system clock at a slower rate. Software
may have to be rewritten to compensate for this new time
base. Software can be redone to toggle the outputs less
frequently. Shielding is added or the PCB is put into an electrically out of the way place (like hiding a monster in the
basement). Having exhausted their design tricks, the designers now search other semiconductor suppliers to find a
quieter part. Finally, when all the time and money runs out
with EMC qualification failing, the decision is made not to
market the product and everyone loses business.
It is from this examination that we can understand that EMC
design issues have to be considered properly at the beginning of the design cycle, in order to reduce complex design
changes which must be done at the completion of the project if EMC testing is failing.
1. Revise PCB Layout
2. Add Components
3. Change Crystal
4. Rewrite Software
5. Add Shielding
6. Relocate PCB
7. Change IC Supplier
8. Fail EMC
Sell Product
3.1 ElectroMagnetic Interference
EMI is a form of electrical-noise pollution. Consider the time
when an electric drill or some other power tool jammed a
nearby radio with buzzing or crackling noise. At times it got
so bad that it prevented you from listening to the radio while
the tool was in use. Or the ignition of an automobile idling
outside your house caused interference to your TV picture
making lines across the screen or even losing sync altogether making the picture flip. These examples are annoying but are not catastrophic.
More serious, how about a sudden loss in telephone communication caused by electrical interference or noise while
you are negotiating an important business deal? Now EMI
can be economically damaging.
The results of EMI incidents can be even further reaching
than these examples. Aircraft navigation errors resulting
from EMI or interruption of air traffic controller service and
may be even computer memory loss due to noise, could
cause two aircraft to collide resulting in the loss of lives and
These were just a few instances to help identify the results
of EMI in a familiar context. To help understand an EMI
situation, the problem can be divided into three areas. They
are the source, the victim, and the coupling path. Secondary
categories involve the coupling path itself. If the source and
victim are separated by space with no hard wire connection,
then the coupling path may be a radiated path and we are
dealing with radiated noise. If the source and victim are connected together through wires, cables, or connectors, then
the coupling path may be a conducted path and we are
dealing with conducted noise. It is possible for both types of
noise to exist at the same time.
car causing interference in the radio. This type of interference is more difficult to contain because, as mentioned earlier, the systems are generally not designed by a single person. However, design methods and control techniques used
to contain the intra-system form of EMI, which are almost
always under the control of a single user, will inherently help
reduce the inter-system noise.
This paper will address problems and solutions in the area
of intra-system noise. Intra-system interference situations
occur when the sources, victims, and coupling paths are
entirely within one system, module or PCB. Systems may
provide emissions that are conducted out of power lines or
be susceptible to emissions conducted through them. Systems may radiate emissions through space in addition to
being susceptible to radiated noise. Noise conducted out
antenna leads turns into radiated noise. By the same token,
radiated noise picked up by the antenna is turned into conducted noise within the system. A perfect example is a PCB
ground loop, which makes an excellent antenna. The system itself is capable of degrading its own performance due
to its own internal generation of conducted and radiated
noise and its susceptibility to it.
Some results of EMI within a system: Noise on power lines
causing false triggering of logic circuits, rapidly changing
signals causing ‘‘glitches’’ on adjacent steady state signal
lines (crosstalk) causing erratic operation, multiple simultaneously switching logic outputs propagating ground bounce
noise throughout system, etc.
3.2 ElectroMagnetic Compatibility
EMI or electrical noise is of world wide concern. Governmental agencies and certain industry bodies have issued
specifications with which all electrical, electromechanical,
and electronic equipment must comply. These specifications and limitations are an attempt to ensure that proper
EMC techniques are followed by manufacturers during the
design and fabrication of their products. When these techniques are properly applied, the product can then operate
and perform with other equipment in a common environment so that no degradation of performance exists due to
internally or externally conducted or radiated electromagnetic emissions. This is defined as ElectroMagnetic Compatibility or EMC.
3.4 Coupling Paths
The modes of coupling an emitter source to a receptor victim can become very complicated. Remember, each EMI
situation can be classified into two categories of coupling,
conducted and radiated. Coupling can also result from a
combination of paths. Noise can be conducted from an
emitter to a point of radiation at the source antenna, then
picked up at the receptor antenna by induction, and re-conducted to the victim. A further complication that multiple
coupling paths presents is that it makes it difficult to determine if eliminating a suspected path has actually done any
good. If two or more paths contribute equally to the problem, eliminating only one path may provide little apparent
TL/DD/12857 – 1
FIGURE 1. EMI Situation
3.3 Inter-System EMI
For the purpose of this paper, when the source of noise is a
module, board, or system and the victim is a different and
separate module, board, or system under the design or control of a different person, it will be considered an inter-system interference situation. Examples of inter-system interference situations could be a Personal Computer interfering
with the operation of a TV or an anti-lock brake module in a
TL/DD/12857 – 2
FIGURE 2. Intra-System EMI Manifestations
3.5 Conducted Interference
In order to discuss the various ways in which EMI can couple from one system to another, it is necessary to define a
few terms. There are two varieties of conducted interference which concern us. The first variety is differential-mode
interference. That is an interference signal that appears between the input terminals of a circuit. The other variety of
conducted interference is called common-mode interference. A common-mode interference signal appears between each input terminal and a third point, the commonmode reference. That reference may be the equipment
chassis, an earth ground, or some other point.
Let’s look at each type of interference individually. In Figure
3 we show a simple circuit consisting of a signal source, VS,
and a load, RL. In Figure 4 we show what happens when
differential-mode interference is introduced into the circuit
by an outside source. As is shown, an interference voltage,
VD, appears between the two input terminals, and an interference current, ID, flows in the circuit. The result is noise at
the load. If, for instance, the load is a logic gate in a computer, and the amplitude of VD is sufficiently high, it is possible
for the gate to incorrectly change states.
TL/DD/12857 – 4
FIGURE 4. Differential-Mode Interference
Figure 5 shows what happens when a ground loop is added
to our circuit. Ground loops, which are undesirable current
paths through a grounded body (such as a chassis), are
usually caused by poor design or by the failure of some
component. In the presence of an interference source, common-mode currents, IC, and a common-mode voltage, VC,
can develop, with the ground loop acting as the commonmode reference. The common-mode current flows on both
input lines, and has the same instantaneous polarity and
direction (the current and voltage are in phase), and returns
through the common-mode reference. The common-mode
voltage between each input and the common-mode reference is identical.
TL/DD/12857 – 5
FIGURE 5. Common-Mode Interference
3.6 Radiated Interference
Radiated coupling itself can take place in one of several
ways. Some of those include field-to-cable coupling, cableto-cable coupling, and common-mode impedance coupling.
Let’s look at those types of coupling one at a time.
The principle behind field-to-cable coupling is the same as
that behind the receiving antenna. That is, when a conductor is placed in a time-varying electromagnetic field, a current is induced in that conductor. That is shown in Figure 6 .
In this figure, we see a signal source, VS, driving a load, RL.
Nearby there is a current carrying wire (or other conductor).
Surrounding the wire is an electromagnetic field induced by
the current flowing in the wire. The circuit acts like a loop
antenna in the presence of this field. As such, an interference current, IN, and an interference voltage, VN, are induced in the circuit. The magnitude of the induced interference signal is roughly proportional to the magnitude of the
incoming field, the frequency of the incoming field, the size
of the loop, and the impedance of the loop.
FIGURE 3. Simple Circuit
TL/DD/12857 – 6
FIGURE 6. Field-to-Cable Coupling
Cable-to-cable coupling occurs when two wires or cables
are run close to each other. Figure 7 shows how cable-tocable coupling works. Figure 7a shows two lengths of cable
(or other conductors) that are running side-by-side. Because
any two conducting bodies have capacitance between
them, called stray capacitance, a time-varying signal in one
wire can couple via that capacitance into the other wire.
That is referred to as capacitive coupling. This stray capacitance, as shown in Figure 7c makes the two cables behave
as if there were a coupling capacitor between them.
Another mechanism of cable-to-cable coupling is mutual inductance. Any wire carrying a time-varying current will develop a magnetic field around it. If a second conductor is
placed near enough to that wire, that magnetic field will induce a similar current in the second conductor. That type of
coupling is called inductive coupling. Mutual inductance, as
shown in Figure 7b, makes the cables behave as if a poorly
wound transformer were connected between them.
In cable-to-cable coupling, either or both of those mechanisms may be responsible for the existence of an interference condition. Though there is no physical connection between the two cables, the properties we have just described
make it possible for the signal on one cable to be coupled to
the other. These effects, when combined are known as the
transmission line effect and have been studied and described thoroughly in other texts.
The basic transmission line equations are derived for distributed parameters R (series resistance), G (shunt conductance), L (series inductance), and C (shunt capacitance), all
defined per unit length of line.
Either or both of the above-mentioned properties cause the
cables to be electromagnetically coupled such that a timevarying signal present on one will cause a portion of that
signal to appear on the other. The ‘‘efficiency’’ of the coupling increases with frequency and inversely with the distance between the two cables. One example of cable-to-cable coupling is telephone ‘‘crosstalk’’, in which several
phone conversations can be overheard at once. The term
crosstalk is now commonly used to describe all types of
cable-to-cable coupling.
TL/DD/12857 – 10
FIGURE 7d. Transmission Line Model
Common-mode impedance coupling occurs when two circuits share a common bus or wire. In Figure 8 we show a
circuit that is susceptible to that type of coupling. In that
figure a TL092 op-amp and a 555 timer share a common
return or ground. Since any conductor (including a PCB
trace) is not ideal, that ground will have a non-zero impedance, Z. Because of that, the current, I, from pin 1 of the 555
will cause a noise voltage, VN, to develop; that voltage is
equal to I x Z. That noise voltage will appear in series with
the input to the op-amp. If that voltage is of sufficient amplitude, a noise condition will result.
TL/DD/12857 – 11
FIGURE 8. Common-Mode Impedance Coupling
While not all inclusive, these coupling paths account for,
perhaps, 98% of all intra-system EMI situations.
We will look at sources of EMI which involve components
that may conduct or radiate electromagnetic energy. These
sources, (component emitters), are different from the equipment and subsystems we have been talking about. Component emitters are sources of EMI which emanate from a
single element rather than a combination of components
such as was previously described. Actually, these component emitters require energy and connecting wires from other sources to function. Therefore, they are not true sources
of EMI, but are EMI transducers. They convert electrical energy to electromagnetic noise.
TL/DD/12857 – 7
FIGURE 7a. Parallel Conductors
4.1 Cables and Connectors
The three main concerns regarding the EMI role of cables
are conceptualized in Figure 9. They act as (1) radiated
emission antennae, (2) radiated susceptibility antennae, and
(3) cable-to-cable or crosstalk couplers. Usually, whatever is
done to harden a cable against radiated emission will also
work in reverse for controlling EMI radiated susceptibility.
The reason for this is usually, when differential-mode radiated emission or susceptibility is the failure mode, twisting
leads and shielding cables reduces EMI. If the failure mechanism is due to common-mode currents circulating in the
cable, twisting leads has essentially no effect on the rela-
TL/DD/12857 – 9
FIGURE 7b. Inductive Coupling
TL/DD/12857 – 8
FIGURE 7c. Capacitive Coupling
Connectors and cables should be viewed as a system to
cost-effectively control EMI rather than to consider the role
of each separately, even though each offers specific interference control opportunities.
tionship between each conductor and the common-mode
reference. Cable shields may help or aggravate EMI depending upon the value of the transfer impedance of the
cable shield. Transfer impedance is a figure of merit of the
quality of cable shield performance defined as the ratio of
coupled voltage to surface current in X/meter. A good cable shield will have a low transfer impedance. The effectiveness of the shield also depends on whether or not the
shield is terminated and, if so, how it is terminated.
Connectors usually are needed to terminate cables. When
no cable shields or connector filters or absorbers are used,
connectors play essentially no role in controlling EMI. The
influence of connector types, however, can play a major role
in the control of EMI above a few MHz. This applies especially when connectors must terminate a cable shield and/
or contain lossy ferrites or filter-pins.
4.2 Components
Under conditions of forward bias, a semiconductor stores a
certain amount of charge in the depletion region. If the diode is then reverse-biased, it conducts heavily in the reverse direction until all of the stored charge has been removed as shown in Figure 10. The duration, amplitude, and
configuration of the recovery-time pulse (also called switching time or period) is a function of the diode characteristics
and circuit parameters. These current spikes generate a
broad spectrum of conducted transient emissions. Diodes
with mechanical imperfections may generate noise when
physically agitated. Such diodes may not cause trouble if
used in a vibration-free environment.
TL/DD/12857 – 12
FIGURE 9. Cables and Connectors
TL/DD/12857 – 13
FIGURE 10. Diode Recovery Periods and Spikes
4.3 Power Supply Noise
Power-supply spiking is perhaps the most important contributor to system noise. When any element switches logic
states, it generates a current spike that produces a voltage
transient. If these transients become too large, they can
cause logic errors because the supply voltage drop upsets
internal logic, or because a supply spike on one circuit’s
output feeds an extraneous noise voltage into the next device’s input.
With CMOS logic in its quiescent state, essentially no current flows between VCC and ground. But when an internal
gate or an output buffer switches state, a momentary current flows from VCC to ground. The switching transient
caused by an unloaded output changing state typically
equals 20 mA peak. Using the circuit shown in Figure 11,
you can measure and display these switching transients under different load conditions.
TL/DD/12857 – 15
FIGURE 12a. VIN, VCC, ICC for CL e 0 pF
Figure 12a shows the current and voltage spikes resulting
from switching a single unloaded (CL e 0 in Figure 11 )
NAND gate. These current spikes, seen at the switching
edges of the signal on VIN, increase when the output is
loaded. Figures 12b, 12c, and 12d show the switching transients when the load capacitance, CL, is 15 pF, 50 pF, and
100 pF, respectively. The large amount of ringing results
from the test circuit’s transmission line effects. This ringing
occurs partly because the CMOS gate switches from a very
high impedance to a very low one and back again. Even for
medium-size loads, load capacitance current becomes a
major current contributor.
TL/DD/12857 – 16
FIGURE 12b. VIN, VCC, ICC for CL e 15 pF
TL/DD/12857 – 17
FIGURE 12c. VIN, VCC, ICC for CL e 50 pF
TL/DD/12857 – 14
FIGURE 11. Test Circuit
TL/DD/12857 – 18
FIGURE 12d. VIN, VCC, ICC for CL e 100 pF
low logic levels. ACT CMOS logic families have noise immunity of 2.9V for high logic levels and 700 mV for low logic
Although on standard CMOS logic internal gates generate
current spikes when switching, the bulk of a spike’s current
comes from output circuit transitions. Figure 13 shows the
ICC current for a NAND gate, as shown in the test circuit,
with one input switching and the other at ground resulting in
no output transitions. Note the very small power-supply
glitches provoked by the input-circuit transitions.
TABLE III. Logic Family Comparisons
CharacSymbol ALS HCMOS
Input VIH (Min) 2.0V
Voltage V (Max) 0.8V
Output VOH (Min) 2.7V VCCb0.1V VCCb0.1V VCCb0.1V
Voltage V
OL (Max) 0.5V
To illustrate noise margin and immunity, Figures 14b and
14c show the output that results when you apply several
types of simulated noise to a 74HC00’s input, Figure 14a .
Typically, even 2V or more input noise produces little
change in the output. The top trace shows noise present on
the input logic level signal and the bottom trace shows resultant noise induced on the output logic level signal.
FIGURE 13a. Test Circuit
TL/DD/12857 – 23
FIGURE 14a. Test Circuit
TL/DD/12857 – 24
4.4 High Speed CMOS Logic Switching
The magnitude of noise which can be tolerated in a system
relates directly to the worst case noise immunity specified
for the logic family. Noise immunity can be described as a
device’s ability to prevent noise on its input from being
transferred to its output. It is the difference between the
worst case output levels (VOH and VOL) of the driving circuit
and the worst case input voltage requirements (VIH and VIL,
respectively) of the receiving circuit.
Using Table III as a guide, it can be seen that for TTL (LS or
ALS) devices the worst case noise immunity is typically
700 mV for the high logic level and 300 mV for the low logic
level. For HCMOS devices the worst case noise immunity is
typically 1.75V for high logic levels and 800 mV for low logic
levels. AC high speed CMOS logic families have noise immunity of 1.75V for high logic levels and 1.25V for
TL/DD/12857 – 25
Figure 15b shows how noise affects 74HC74’s clock input.
Again, no logic errors occur with 2V or more of noise on the
clock input.
sities increase. Our discussion on cable-to-cable coupling
described crosstalk as appearing due to the distributed capacitive coupling and the distributed inductive coupling between two signal lines. When crosstalk is measured on an
undriven sense line next to a driven line (both terminated at
their characteristic impedances), the near end crosstalk and
the far end crosstalk have quite distinct features, as shown
in Figure 16. It should be noted that the near end component reduces to zero at the far end and vice versa. At any
point in between, the crosstalk is a fractional sum of the
near and far end crosstalk waveforms as shown in the figure. It also can be noted that the far end crosstalk can have
either polarity whereas the near end crosstalk always has
the same polarity as the signal causing it.
The amplitude of the noise generated on the undriven
sense line is directly related to the edge rates of the signal
on the driven line. The amplitude is also directly related to
the proximity of the two lines. This is factored into the coupling constants KNE and KFE by terms that include the distributed capacitance per unit length, the distributed inductance per unit length, and the length of the line. The lead-tolead capacitance and mutual inductance thus created causes ‘‘noise’’ voltages to appear when adjacent signal paths
Several useful observations that apply to a general case
can then be made:
TL/DD/12857 – 21
FIGURE 15a. Test Circuit
# The crosstalk always scales with the signal amplitude VI.
# Absolute crosstalk amplitude is proportional to slew rate
TL/DD/12857 – 22
VI/tr not just 1/tr.
# Far end crosstalk width is always tr.
# For tr kk 2 TL, where tr is the transition time of the
When using high speed CMOS, even with its greater noise
immunity, crosstalk, induced supply noise and noise transients become factors. Higher speeds allow the device to
respond more quickly to externally induced noise transients
and accentuate the parasitic interconnection inductances
and capacitances that increase self-induced noise and
signal on the driven line and TL is the propagation or bus
delay down the line, the near end crosstalk amplitude,
VNE, expressed as a fraction of signal amplitude, VI, is
KNE which is a function of physical layout only.
# The high the value of ‘‘tr’’ (slower transition times) the
lower the percentage of crosstalk (relative to signal amplitude).
4.5 Signal Crosstalk
The problem of crosstalk, and how to deal with it, is becoming more important as system performance and board den-
TL/DD/12857 – 26
FIGURE 16. Crosstalk
ability increase in advanced logic families, the effects of
these intrinsic electrical characteristics become more pronounced. One of these parasitic electrical characteristics is
the inductance found in all leadframe materials.
Although all circuit conductors have transmission line properties, these characteristics become significant when the
edge rates of the drivers are equal to or less than about
three times the propagation delay of the line. Significant
transmission line properties may be exhibited, for example,
where devices having edge rates of 3 ns (or less) are used
to drive traces of 8 inches or greater, assuming propagation
delays of 1.7 ns/ft for an unloaded printed circuit trace.
Figure 17 shows a simple circuit model for a CMOS device
in a leadframe driving a standard test load. The inductor L1
represents the parasitic inductance in the ground lead of the
package; inductor L2 represents the parasitic inductance in
the power lead of the package; inductor L3 represents the
parasitic inductance in the output lead of the package; the
resistor R1 represents the output impedance of the device
output, and the capacitor and resistor CL and RL represent
the standard test load on the output of the device.
The three waveforms shown represent how ground bounce
is generated. The top waveform shows the voltage (V)
across the load as it is switched from a logic HIGH to a logic
LOW. The output slew rate is dependent upon the characteristics of the output transistor, and the inductors L1 and
L3, and CL, the load capacitance. In order to change the
output from a HIGH to a LOW, current must flow to discharge the load capacitance. The second waveform shows
the current that is generated as the capacitor discharges
[I e bCL*(dV/dt)]. This current, as it changes, causes a
voltage to be generated across the inductances in the circuit. The formula for the voltage across an inductor is
V e L(dI/dt). The third waveform shows the voltage that is
induced across the inductance in the ground lead due to the
changing currents [VGB e L1*(dI/dt)]. This induced voltage
creates what is known as ground bounce.
Because the inductor is between the external system
ground and the internal device ground, the induced voltage
causes the internal ground to be at a different potential than
the external ground. This shift in potential causes the device
inputs and outputs to behave differently than expected because they are referenced to the internal device ground,
while the devices which are either driving into the inputs or
being driven by the outputs are referenced to the their own
device ground. External to the device, ground bounce causes input thresholds to shift and output levels to change.
4.6 Signal Interconnects
Of the many properties of transmission lines, two are of
major interest to the system designer: ZOE, the effective
equivalent impedance of the line, and tpde, the effective
propagation delay down the line. It should be noted that the
intrinsic values of line impedance and propagation delay, ZO
and tpd, are geometry-dependent. Once the intrinsic values
are known, the effects of gate loading can be calculated.
The loaded values for ZOE and tpde can be calculated with:
01 a Ct/Cl
tpde e tpd 01 a Ct/Cl
where Ci e intrinsic line capacitance
Ct e additional capacitance due to gate loading.
These formulas indicate that the loading of lines decreases
the effective impedance of the line and increases the propagation delay. As was mentioned earlier, lines that have a
propagation delay greater than one third the rise time of the
signal driver should be evaluated for transmission line effects. When performing transmission line analysis on a bus,
only the longest, most heavily loaded and the shortest, least
loaded lines need to be analyzed. All lines in a bus should
be terminated equally; if one line requires termination, all
lines in the bus should be terminated. This will ensure similar signal quality on all of the lines.
4.7 Ground Bounce
Ground bounce occurs as a result of the intrinsic characteristics of the leadframes and bond wires of the packages
used to house CMOS devices. As edge rates and drive cap-
TL/DD/12857 – 27
FIGURE 17a. Test Circuit for Ground Bounce
TL/DD/12857 – 28
TL/DD/12857 – 29
FIGURE 18. Intra-System EMI Manifestations
might be the primary emphasis, the potential problems associated with either (1) susceptibility to outside conducted
and/or radiated emissions or (2) tendency to pollute the
outside world from its own undesired emissions, come under the primary classification of intra-system EMI. Corresponding EMI-control techniques, however, address themselves to both self-jamming and emission/susceptibility in
accordance with applicable EMI specifications. The techniques that will be discussed include filtering, shielding, wiring and grounding.
Inter-system EMI distinguishes itself by interference between two or more discrete and separate systems or platforms which are frequently under independent user control.
Culprit emissions and/or susceptibility situations are divided
into two classes: (1) antenna entry/exit and (2) back-door
entry/exit. More than 95% of inter-system EMI problems
involve the antenna entry/exit route of EMI. We can group
inter-system EMI-control techniques by four fundamental
categories: frequency management, time management, location management and direction management.
The first step in determining a solution is to identify the
problem as either inter-system or intra-system EMI. Generally, if the specimen has an antenna and the problem develops from what exits or enters the antenna from another
specimen or ambient, then the problem is identified as intersystem EMI. Otherwise, it is intra-system EMI which we will
discuss now.
Although this discussion is limited to ground bounce generated during HIGH-to-LOW transitions, it should be noted
that the ground bounce is also generated during LOW-toHIGH transitions. This ground bounce though, has a much
smaller amplitude and therefore does not present the same
There are many factors which affect the amplitude of the
ground bounce. Included are:
# Number of outputs switching simultaneously: more outputs results in more ground bounce.
# Type of output load: capacitive loads generate two to
three times more ground bounce than typical system
traces. Increasing the capacitive load to approximately
60 pF –70 pF, increases ground bounce. Beyond 70 pF,
ground bounce drops off due to the filtering effect of the
load itself. Moving the load away from the output also
reduces the ground bounce.
# Location of the output pin: outputs closer to the ground
pin exhibit less ground bounce than those further away
due to effectively lower L1 and L3.
# Voltage: lowering VCC reduces ground bounce.
Ground bounce produces several symptoms:
# Altered device states.
# Propagation delay degradation.
# Undershoot on active outputs. The worst-case undershoot will be approximately equal to the worst-case quiet
output noise.
5.1 Intra-System EMI Control Techniques
5.1.1 Shielding
Shielding is used to reduce the amount of electromagnetic
radiation reaching a sensitive victim circuit. Shields are
made of metal and work on the principle that electromagnetic fields are reflected and/or attenuated by a metal surface. Different types of shielding are needed for different
types of fields. Thus, the type of metal used in the shield
and the shield’s construction must be considered carefully if
the shield is to function properly. The ideal shield has no
holes or voids and, in order to accommodate cooling vents,
buttons, lamps and access panels, special meshes and
‘‘EMI-hardened’’ components are needed.
EMI control techniques involve both hardware implementations/methods and procedures. They may also be divided
into intra-system and inter-system EMI control. Our major
concern in this paper is intra-system EMI control, however,
an overview of each may be appropriate at this time.
Figure 18 illustrates the basic elements of concern in an
intra-system EMI problem. The test specimen may be a single box, an equipment, subsystem or system (an ensemble
of boxes with interconnecting cables). From a strictly nearsighted or selfish point-of-view, the only EMI concern would
appear to be degradation of performance due to self jamming such as suggested at the top of the figure. While this
TABLE IV. Effective Shielding for Different Materials
Shielding Material
Shielding Effectiveness dB
Surface Resistance (X/square)
At 10 MHz
At 100 MHz
At 1 GHz
Arc-Sprayed Zinc
Silver Acrylic Paint
Silver Deposition
Silver Epoxy Paint
Nickel Composite
Carbon Composite
Wire Screen (0.64 mm Grid)
Effectiveness of shielding materials with 25 mm thickness and for frequencies for which the largest dimension of the shielding plate is less than a quarter of a
Once a printed-circuit board design has been optimized for
minimal EMI, residual interference can be further reduced if
the board is placed in a shielded enclosure. A box’s shielding effectiveness depends on three main factors: its skin,
the control of radiation leakage through the box’s apertures
or open areas (like cooling holes) and the use of filters or
shields at interconnection points depending on shield
A box skin is typically fabricated from sheet metal or metallized plastic. Normally sheet metal skin that is 1 mm thick is
more than adequate; it may have a shielding effectiveness
of more than 100 dB throughout the high-frequency spectrum from 1 MHz to 20 GHz. Conductive coatings on plastic
boxes are another matter. Table IV shows that at 10 MHz
the shielding effectiveness can be as low as 27 dB if a carbon composite (cheap) is used, or it can run as high as 106
dB for zinc sprayed on plastic by an electric arc process
(expensive). Plastic filled materials or composites having either conductive powder, flakes, or filament are also used in
box shielding; they have an effectiveness similar to that of
metallized plastics.
In many cases shielding effectiveness of at least 40 dB is
required of plastic housings for microcontroller-based equipment to reduce printed-circuit board radiation to a level that
meets FCC regulations in the United States or those of the
VDE in Europe. Such skin shielding is easy to achieve. The
problem is aperture leakage. The larger the aperture, the
greater its radiation leakage because the shield’s natural
attenuation has been reduced. On the other hand, multiple
small holes matching the same area as the single large aperture can attain the same amount of cooling with little or no
loss of attenuation.
TL/DD/12857 – 30
FIGURE 19. Filtering
5.1.3 Wiring
Now that the equipment in each box can be successfully
designed to combat EMI emission and susceptibility separately, the boxes may be connected together to form a system. Here the input and output cables and, to a lesser extent, the power cable form an ‘‘antenna farm’’ that greatly
threatens the overall electromagnetic compatibility of the
system. Most field remedies for EMI problems focus on the
coupling paths created by the wiring that interconnects systems. By this time most changes to the individual equipment
circuits are out of the question.
Let us address five coupling paths that are encountered in
typical systems comprised of two or more pieces of equipment connected by cables. These should adequately cover
most EMI susceptibility problems. They are:
# common ground impedance couplingÐa conducting
path in which a common impedance is shared between
an undesired emission source and the receptor.
# common-mode, radiated field-to-cable couplingÐelectromagnetic fields penetrate a loop formed by two pieces
of equipment, a cable connecting them, and a ground
5.1.2 Filtering
Filters are used to eliminate conducted interference on cables and wires, and can be installed at either the source or
the victim. Figure 19 shows an AC power-line filter. The values of the components are not critical; as a guide, the capacitors can be between 0.01 and 0.001 mF, and the inductors are nominally 6.3 mH. Capacitor C1 is designed to shunt
any high-frequency differential-mode currents before they
can enter the equipment to be protected. Capacitors C2 and
C3 are included to shunt any common-mode currents to
ground. The inductors, L1 and L2, are called common-mode
chokes, and are placed in the circuit to impede any common-mode currents.
# differential-mode, radiated field-to-cable couplingÐthe
electromagnetic fields penetrate a loop formed by two
pieces of equipment and an interconnecting transmission
line or cable.
# crosstalk couplingÐsignals in one transmission line or
cable are capacitively or inductively coupled into another
transmission line.
# conductive pathÐthrough power lines feeding the equipment.
The first coupling path is formed when two pieces of equipment are connected to the same ground conductor at different points, an arrangement that normally produces a volt-
pickup of differential-mode radiation. In a balanced transmission line, this is done by use of twisted-wire pairs and a
shielded cable.
age difference between the two points. If possible, connecting both pieces of equipment to a single-point ground eliminates this voltage. Another remedy is to increase the high
frequency impedance along a loop that includes the path
between the ground connections of the two boxes. Examples include the isolation of printed-circuit boards from their
cabinet or case, the use of a shielded isolation transformer
in the signal path, or the insertion of an inductor between
one or both boxes and the ground conductor. The use of
balanced circuits, differential line drivers and receivers, and
absorbing ferrite beads and rods on the interconnecting cable can further reduce currents produced by this undesirable coupling path.
For crosstalk, the fourth coupling path, the reduction of capacitive coupling, can be achieved by the implementation of
at least one of these steps:
# Reducing the spacing between wire pairs in either or
both of the transmission lines.
# Increasing the separation between the two transmission
# Reducing the frequency of operation of the source, if
# Adding a cable shield over either or both transmission
# Twisting the source’s or receptor’s wire pairs.
# Twisting both wire pairs in opposite directions.
The fifth coupling path conductively produces both common-mode and differential-mode noise pollution on the
power mains. Among several remedies that can suppress
the EMI there are filters and isolation transformers.
There are only about 50 common practical remedies that
can be used in most EMI situations. Of these, about 10
suffice in 80 percent of the situations. Most engineers are
aware of at least some of these remediesÐfor example,
twisting wires to reduce radiation pickup.
In order to attack the EMI problem, one can make use of the
information contained in Tables V and VI. First, decide what
coupling path has the worst EMI interference problem. From
the 11 most common coupling paths listed at the top of the
table, find the problem coupling path. Using the numbers
found in that table entry, locate the recommended remedy
or remedies from the 12 common EMI fixes identified at the
bottom of the table. This procedure should be repeated until
all significant coupling paths have been properly controlled
and the design goal has been met.
TL/DD/12857 – 31
FIGURE 20. Common Ground Impedance Coupling
A balanced circuit is configured so its two output signal
leads are electrically symmetrical with respect to ground, as
the signal increases on one output, the signal on the other
decreases. Differential line drivers produce a signal that is
electrically symmetrical with respect to ground from a single-ended circuit in which only one lead is changing with
respect to ground. Ferrite beads, threaded over electrical
conductors, substantially attenuate electromagnetic interference by turning radio-frequency energy into heat, which
is dissipated in them.
In the second coupling path, a radiated electromagnetic
field is converted into a common-mode voltage in the
ground plane loop containing the interconnect cable and
both boxes. This voltage may be reduced if the loop area is
Ferrite beads and ferrite filtered connectors applied to the
interconnecting cable can help reduce common mode currents.
TABLE V. Electromagnetic Interference Coupling Paths
(See Table VI)
Radiated Field to Interconnecting Cable
2, 7, 8, 9, 11
Radiated Field to Interconnecting Cable
2, 5, 6
Interconnecting Cable to Radiated Field
1, 3, 9, 11
Interconnecting Cable to Radiated Field
1, 3, 5, 6, 7
Cable-to-Cable Crosstalk
Radiated Field to Box
The third coupling path produces a differential-mode voltage that appears across the input terminals of the EMI receptor. One way of controlling this is to cancel or block the
12, 13
Box-to-Box Radiation
12, 13
1, 2, 7, 8, 9
Power Mains to Box Conduction
4, 11
Box to Power Mains Conduction
4, 11
Electromagnetic Interference Coupling
12, 13
Box to Radiated Field
Box-to-Box Conduction
TL/DD/12857 – 32
FIGURE 21. Common-Mode, Radiated
Field-to-Cable Coupling
1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 10, 11
5.2.3 Location Management
TABLE VI. Electromagnetic Interference Fixes
1. Insert Filter in Signal
2. Insert Filter in Signal
3. Insert Filter in Power
4. Insert Filter in Power
5. Twist Wire Pair
6. Shield Cable
7. Use Balanced Circuits
8. Install Differential Line
Drivers and Receivers
9. Float Printed Circuit
10. Separate Wire Pair
11. Use Ferrite Beads
12. Use a Multilayer Instead of
a Single Layer Printed
Circuit Board(s)
Location management refers to EMI control by the selection
of location of the potential victim receptor with respect to all
other emitters in the environment. In this regard, separation
distance between transmitters and receivers is one of the
most significant forms of control since interfering source
emissions are reduced greatly with the distance between
them. The relative position of potentially interfering transmitters to the victim receiver are also significant. If the emitting
source and victim receiver are shielded by obstacles, the
degree of interference would be substantially reduced.
5.2.4 Direction Management
Direction management refers to the technique of EMI control by gainfully using the direction and attitude of arrival of
electromagnetic signals with respect to the potential victim’s receiving antennae.
If we examine the modes of EMI emissions and the methods of suppression that were described, on standard CMOS
silicon the techniques are exactly the same for what occurs
on a PCB. What silicon design engineers at National Semiconductor’s Embedded Technologies Division noticed, was
that a majority of the EMI emitted from a controller or processor is caused by the transient ICC current flowing in the
loop formed from the bypass capacitor to the VCC pin and
out of the GND pin. When this current was measured by
inserting a 1X resistor in this path, a 40 mA (10 ns) current
spike was revealed at every clock edge (repetition rate e
2x clock frequency). This occurred even when outputs were
toggling or tristated, and instructions that were being executed had very little impact on the magnitude or duration of
the spike.
5.2 Inter-System EMI-Control Techniques
There are many EMI controls that may be carried out to
enhance the chances of inter-system EMC. They can be
grouped into four categories which we will discuss briefly.
The following discussion is not intended to be complete but
merely provide an overview of some EMI control techniques
available to the inter-system designer and user.
6.1 Chip Problems
Let’s note the four items that produce higher amplitude and
frequency fundamental and harmonics: large amplitude
change, fast rise time or fall time, high repetition rate and
finally large pulse width (a 50% duty cycle). Table VII lists
5.2.1 Frequency Management
Frequency management suggests both transmitter emission
control and improvement of receptors against spurious responses. The object is to design and operationally maintain
transmitters so that they occupy the least frequency spectrum possible in order to help control electromagnetic pollution. For example, this implies that long pulse rise and fall
times should be used. Quite often one of the most convenient, economic and rapid solutions to an EMI problem in
the field, is to change frequency of either the victim receiver
or the culprit source.
TABLE VII. IC Chip Problems
1. Large Amplitude Change
2. Fast Rise or Fall Time
3. High Repetition Rate
4. Large Pulse Width (i.e. 50% Duty Cycle).
As a rule, the waveforms di/dt (rate of change of current)
and dv/dt (rate of change of voltage) must be kept to a
minimum. If a silicon design engineer could shape both current and voltage waveforms around the device, these problems would be solved. If we look at the current and voltage
problems separately, we can solve them both and decrease
radiated emissions by more than 20 dB.
But, what about the antennae responsible for radiation?
This is where packaging technology comes into the picture.
The loop size of a typical system is approximately greater
5.2.2 Time Management
In those applications where information is passed between
systems, a possible time management technique could be
utilized where the amount of information transferred is kept
to a minimum. This should reduce the amount of time that
the receptor is susceptible to any EMI. In communication
protocols, for example, essential data could be transmitted
in short bursts or control information could be encoded into
fewer bits.
than 90% PCB trace dimensions plus IC package dimensions and less than 10% IC chip dimensions, which both
factor into the antenna gain. Therefore the IC package design should obey several rules, see Table VIII. First a ground
pin (current return) adjacent to each power pin will minimize
the loop sizes and simplify layout of decoupling circuits.
Also an output pin which sources or sinks a large and frequent di/dt (for example crystal or clock pins) should also
be adjacent to the power/ground pin pair to keep its current
loops small. It helps to have small package dimensions. A
last point is that sharing of a common power/ground should
be limited to prevent their voltage from bouncing due to the
total Ldi/dt a iR. This bouncing is conducted to inputs sharing the common power/ground which in several cases are
susceptible since their VIH and VIL trip points are referenced
to it. The bouncing is conducted through non-tristated outputs sharing this common power/ground and is passed on
outside the IC as additional conducted and radiated emissions from bouncing VOH or VOL levels.
On-chip level shifting circuitry is inserted as interface between the nucleus and the perimeter. It permits the nucleus
to operate at a lower VCC than the perimeter. This permits
the nucleus VCC to come through the on-chip ICC choke
emerging as a bouncing VCC.
In general, outputs toggle much less frequently than the
clock. This rate is limited by software execution rates. However, for the case of a clock or address/data bus outputs
this may not be the case. Looking at time domain EMI instead of frequency domain EMI (which may have some time
averaging) may motivate one to take action and reduce EMI
from the chip’s output drivers. CMOS output drivers turn on
fast, in about 1 ns. This causes 2 problems. The first is
called ‘‘shoot through’’ current which flows from DVCC to
DGND when both the pull up and the pull down drivers are
on and the output load is small. The second is due to output
current magnitude increasing to maximum in about 1 ns
when the output changes state. Both problems are solved
by using fast turn off, gradual turn on device drivers.
TABLE VIII. Package and PCB Traces form Loop or
Whip Antennae which Radiate
Figure 22 illustrates, in block diagram form, how the chip is
partitioned for EMC. Note that the level shifter block is multichannel, and most channels need dedicated level shifting
devices in one direction only as shown. The power/ground
pads named DVCC (Driver VCC), LVCC (Logic VCC), VCC (a
global VCC to most of the chip), GND (a global GND to most
of the chip) and DGND (driver ground) are all available. To
minimize package pin count, DVCC and LVCC can be bonded to the same pin, GND and DGND can be bonded to the
same pin, and the VCC pad is not bonded. A higher pin
count package is used to bring out each pad to a separate
pin to allow study of the several packaging options. The VCC
pad is not bonded when utilizing the on-chip ICC choke to
prevent RE (radiated emissions) from VCC bounce.
Three operating modes can be evaluated with GND and
DGND pads always connected together to 0V. The first
mode applies 5V to DVCC, LVCC and VCC to check the RE
improvements due to gradual turn on outputs alone. The
second mode applies 5V to DVCC and LVCC where VCC
floats as a test point. This checks the RE improvements due
to gradual turn on and ICC choking. The third mode applies
5V to DVCC and 3V to VCC and LVCC to check the RE
improvement in this mode which actually requires a VCC
additional package pin.
1. Ground pin (current return) not adjacent to power
pin). Pair should be together.
2. Power/Ground pair not adjacent to output pin
(especially crystal of clock pins).
3. Too much sharing of common power/ground
having voltage bounce due to its total Ldi/dt a iR.
a. Conducted emissions to susceptible I/O
b. Radiated emissions from susceptible I/O.
4. Large package dimensions.
6.2 Silicon Design Changes
National’s design goal was to reshape the IC pin current
waveforms from their original values as follows: ICC pulses
to 3X rise time, 0.2X amplitude and 5X width; IOL and IOH
pulses to 10X rise time. A second goal is to provide separate power and ground bus systems on-chip for each of the
following groups: Chip digital logic, Chip I/O buffers, and if
present a chip A/D converter (or other analog intensive sections). This is an extension of proper IC packaging pinout
covered earlier to prevent conducted emissions to susceptible circuitry.
Inspection of these goals leads us to divide the chip into
separate areas which we named the nucleus, the perimeter
and the A/D. Also the partitioning of the nucleus (containing
the digital logic functions) and the perimeter (containing digital I/O, oscillator and comparator functions) allows use of
an on-chip device to choke the nucleus’ ICC current, thereby
wave shaping the ICC. The ICC choke, however, causes the
nucleus VCC voltage to dip by 0.5V to 1V at each clock
edge. These VCC voltage swings will be confined to within
the chip’s nucleus where the circuitry (digital logic) is tolerant and no significant radiation antennae exist.
TABLE IX. Results of Various Pinout Configurations
Configuration A
Configuration B
Configuration C
Test Point
b 20 dB
b 6 dB
Clock Speed
10 MHz
l 5 MHz
4 MHz
Chip Pads
TL/DD/12857 – 33
FIGURE 22. Block Diagram of EMC Circuitry
6.3 Packaging Changes
Recalling our IC packaging rules for EMC, and upon reviewing the packaging pitfalls (Table VIII), one can now appreciate an IC package build sheet (Figure 23) that illustrates
how to bond out and pin out the five power/ground pads on
the die. As advised, power pins having current return ground
pins adjacent are LVCC and GND, VCC and GND; but DVCC
and DGND are not adjacent. This is permitted since DVCC
current is returned via output high pins (not DGND), also
DGND current is sourced via output low pins. Therefore
placing DVCC adjacent to DGND does not contribute to
small area current loops. Note that CKI, CKO, LVCC, and
GND are all adjacent pins for the sake of clustering the
oscillator external tank circuit into the smallest current loop
area. Since the oscillator is supplied through LVCC and
GND, added benefit of running both oscillator and nucleus
at 3V is possible if one were to choose defeating the onchip choke by shorting LVCC to VCC in the choke block.
TL/DD/12857 – 34
FIGURE 23. EMC Pinout
6.4 Results of IC Circuit Changes
Simulations give an idea of the expected improvement from
addition of the ICC choke on the silicon. Figure 24a shows
actual ICC as measured by a series resistance during
switching transients. Simulation of an equivalent circuit with
the addition of the choke predicts a decrease of ICC from
about 37 mA to less than 4 mA.
This decrease of 10x would imply a 20 dB improvement in
gross emissions.
Test results in Figure 26 show emissions of 45 dBmV reduced to less than 20 dBmV on the same device. Unchoked
tests were performed using the bonding options previously
Figure 25 gives the predicted performance degradation from
implementing gradual turn-on outputs. High to low transition
time propagation delays are doubled and low to high transitions are slowed by about 50%. Remember, though, that
propagation delays for an embedded microcontroller are
usually of minimal concern since control is based on levels
or edges of individual signals or on timing which is under
software control. Software control is slow enough that the
change in hardware timing is probably negligible.
An indication of the type of emission reduction resulting
from the implementation of gradual turn-on can be seen if
you look at the baselines of the plots of Figure 26. Changes
of the outputs occur at low frequency with large amplitude,
fast rise time current spikes. The low frequency of the signal
keeps the harmonic close together and makes the emissions appear broadband. The fast rise time maintains a
higher level of emissions to a higher frequency.
TL/DD/12857 – 35
FIGURE 24a. Original ICC
TL/DD/12857 – 36
FIGURE 24b. ICC with Improvements
TL/DD/12857 – 39
TL/DD/12857 – 37
FIGURE 25a. Emissions without VCC Choke
TL/DD/12857 – 40
TL/DD/12857 – 38
FIGURE 25b. Emissions with Addition of VCC Choke
order to achieve a predetermined signal to noise ratio
(SNR) at the speaker. In this case the input was chosen
to be a 22 kHz deviation of a frequency modulated signal
within the US commercial FM radio broadcast band. The
signal to noise criterion used was 30 dB.
2. Two other devices, a COP888GG and a COP87M88GG
OTP, were placed in a common two sided PCB in a TEM
cell and were programmed to run a standard EMI test
program included in National’s first silicon engineering
code. Load capacitors of 10 pF and 4.7 kX pull-up resistors used on the eight pins of Port L. The port was programmed to count in a binary manner with the least significant bit changing state every 100 ms. (Figure 27 illustrates the board layout.) Four AA batteries were attached
to the board and the supply voltage was regulated with a
Zener diode.
Emissions were measured with the TEM cell on a Tektronix Model 2754P Spectrum Analyzer over the range of
DC to 750 MHz.
We have discussed in previous sections that we can reduce
EMI by proper board design and by the selection of low EMI
devices. We will now investigate whether EMI reduced parts
are worth it. The goal of this testing is to determine the
relative electromagnetic emissions from various production
options of the COP8 microcontroller. Since most people use
OTPs to qualify their end product for emissions approval,
both OTPs and ROMmed devices will be tested. The options chosen were:
1. COP8788EGMH (OTP) part used for development and
Prototype approval
2. COP888EK (masked ROM) part used for final production
(EMI reduced)
3. COP8788GG (OTP) part used for development and Prototype approval
4. COP888GG (masked ROM) part used for final production
(EMI reduced)
7.2 Radio Results
Worst case useable sensitivity is improved by about 17 dB
(25 dBmV to 8 dBmV) by the change from the
COP888EGMH OTP to the mask programmed COP888EK.
Of course not all frequencies show this improvement, but
there is some increased sensitivity throughout the spectrum.
Note that two local radio stations (at 105.7 MHz and 106.5
MHz) were received even without an external antenna.
7.1 Test Procedure
These tests were performed in two ways:
1. Two DIP parts, a COP888EK and a COP888EGMH OTP
device, were programmed for use as the main processor
in an automotive radio and the relative performance of
the radio was measured for each device. The measure of
performance chosen was Usable Sensitivity. This is defined as the minimum input required at the antenna in
TL/DD/12857 – 42
FIGURE 27. PCB Layout for EMI Testing
TL/DD/12857 – 41
FIGURE 28. Usable Sensitivity Comparison
Much more noticeable is the reduction of spectral density in
the noise. Off harmonic noise is not noticeable.
7.3 EMI Board Results
Except for the fundamental oscillator frequency of approximately 5 MHz, emissions are down at least 10 dB on the
monolithic masked device over the multichip OTP device.
Emissions beyond 100 MHz are practically eliminated.
TL/DD/12857 – 43
FIGURE 29. COP888GG with 5 MHz Crystal Oscillator
TL/DD/12857 – 44
FIGURE 30. COP87L88GG with 5 MHz Crystal Oscillator
The type of logic to be used is normally an early design
decision, so that control of edge speeds and, hence, emissions and susceptibiity is made early. Of course, other factors such as required system performance, speed, and timing considerations must enter into this decision. If possible,
design the circuit with as slow speed logic as possible. The
use of slow speed logic, however, does not guarantee that
EMC will exist when the circuit is built; so proper EMC techniques should still be implemented consistently during the
remainder of the circuit design.
7.4 Conclusions
Radiated Emissions do not come from a device, but from a
board. Devices have some control over the emissions because they generate the noise which is radiated. The equation normally used to predict emission from a system is:
lE lMax e
1.32 c 10b3 cI cA cFreq 2
c 1a
2 (/2
Ð # 2qD J (
lElMax is the maximum E-field in the plane of the loop in
8.2 Component Layout
Component layout is the second stage in PCB design. Schematics tell little or nothing about how systems will perform
once the board is etched, stuffed, and powered. A circuit
schematic is useful to the design engineer, but an experienced EMC engineer refers to the PCB when trouble-shooting. By controlling the board layout in the design stage, the
designer realizes two benefits: (1) a decrease in EMI problems when the circuit or system is sent for EMI or quality
assurance testing; and (2) the number of EMI coupling
paths is reduced, saving troubleshooting time and effort later on.
Some layout guidelines for arranging components according
to logic speed, frequency, and function are shown in Figure
31. These guidelines are very general. A particular circuit is
likely to require a combination and/or trade-offs of these
arrangements. Isolation of the I/O from digital circuitry is
important where emissions or susceptibility may be a problem. For the case of emissions, a frequently encountered
coupling path involves digital energy coupling through I/O
circuitry and signal traces onto I/O cables and wires, where
the latter subsequently radiate. When susceptibility is a
problem, it is common for the EMI energy to couple from
I/O circuits onto sensitive digital lines, even though the I/O
lines may be ‘‘opto-coupled’’ or otherwise supposedly isolated. In both situations, the solution often lies in the proper
electrical and physical isolation of analog and low speed
digital lines from high speed circuits. When high speed signals are designed to leave the board, the reduction of EMI is
usually performed via shielding of I/O cables and is not considered here.
Therefore, a major guideline in layout out boards is to isolate the I/O circuitry from the high speed logic. This method
applies even if the logic is being clocked at ‘‘only’’ a few
MHz. Often, the fundamental frequency is of marginal interest, with the harmonics generated from switching edges of
the clock being the biggest emission culprits. Internal system input/output PCB circuitry should be mounted as close
to the edge connector as possible and capacitive filtering of
these lines may be necessary to reduce EMI on the lines.
High speed logic components should be grouped together.
Digital interface circuitry and I/O circuitry should be physically isolated from each other and routed on separate connectors, if possible as shown in Figure 27d.
l is the current amplitude, at the frequency of interest, in
A is the loop area is cm2
l is the wavelength at the frequency of interest
D is the observation distance in meters
Freq is the frequency in MHz
and the perimeter of the loop P kk l
When applied to a chip, the area is very small and current
is relatively low compared to current consumption in a
typical system, thus the emissions are low.
The growth of concern over electromagnetic compatibility
(EMC) in electronic systems continues to rise in the years
since the FCC proclaimed that there shall be no more
pollution of the electromagnetic spectrum. Still, designers
have not yet fully come to grips with a major source and
victim of electromagnetic interferenceÐthe PCB. The
most critical stage for addressing EMI is during the circuit
board design. Numerous tales of woe can be recounted
about the eleventh hour attempt at solving an EMI problem by retrofit because EMC was given no attention during design. This retrofit ultimately costs much more than
design stage EMC, holds up production and generally
makes managers unhappy. With these facts in mind, let’s
address electromagnetic compatibility considerations in
PCB design.
8.1 Logic Selection
Logic selection can ultimately dictate how much attention
must be given to EMC in the total circuit design. The first
guideline should be: use the slowest speed logic that will
do the job. Logic speed refers to transition times of output
signals and gate responses to input signals. Many emissions and susceptibility problems can be minimized if a
slow speed logic is used. For example, a square wave
clock or signal pulse with a 3 ns rise time generates radio
frequency (100 MHz and higher) energy that is gated
about on the PCB. It also means that the logic can respond to comparable radio frequency energy if it gets
onto the boards.
8.3 Power Supply Bussing
Power supply bussing is the next major concern in the design phase. Isolated digital and analog power supplies must
be used when mixing analog and digital circuitry on a board.
The design preferably should provide for separate power
supply distribution for both the analog and digital circuitry.
Single point common grounding of analog and digital power
supplies should be performed at one point and one point
onlyÐusually at the motherboard power supply input for
multi-card designs, or at the power supply input edge connector on a single card system. The fundamental feature of
good power supply bussing, however, is low impedance and
good decoupling over a large range of frequencies. A low
impedance distribution system requires two design features:
(1) proper power supply and return trace layout and (2)
proper use of decoupling capacitors.
An exception to the rule of analog and digital ground separation applies in the case of high speed interface between
analog and digital portions. If possible, the ground plane
should be continuous under these interface traces to improve the proximity of the return trace and thus minimize the
size of the loop.
At high frequencies, PCB traces and the power supply busses ( a VCC and 0V) are viewed as transmission lines with
associated characteristic impedance, ZO, as modeled in
Figure 28. The goal of the designer is to maximize the capacitance between the lines and minimize the self-inductance, thus creating a low ZO. Table X, shows the characteristic impedance of various two-trace configurations as a
function of trace width, W, and trace separation, h.
FIGURE 31a. Board Layout
FIGURE 31b. Board Layout
FIGURE 31c. Board Layout
TL/DD/12857 – 49
FIGURE 32. Transmission Line Modelling of PCB Traces
FIGURE 31d. Board Layout
Any one of the three configurations may be viewed as a
possible method of routing power supply (or signal) traces.
The most important feature of this table is the noticeable
difference in impedance between the parallel strips and
strip over ground plane compared with the side-by-side configurations.
As an example of the amount of voltage that can be generated across the impedance of a power bus, consider TTL
logic which pulls a current of approximately 16 mA from a
supply that has a 25X bus impedance (this assumes no
decoupling present). The transient voltage is approximately
dV e 0.016 x 25X e 400 mV, which is equal to the noise
immunity level of the TTL logic. A 25X (or higher) impedance is not uncommon in many designs where the supply
and return traces are routed on the same side of the board
in a side-by-side fashion. In fact, it is not uncommon to find
situations where the power supply and return traces are
routed quite a distance from each other, thereby increasing
the overall impedance of the distribution system and the
size of the loop antenna. This is obviously a poor layout.
Power and ground planes offer the lowest overall impedance. The use of these planes leads the designer closer to
a multi-layer board. At the very least, it is recommended that
all open areas on the PCB be ‘‘landfilled’’ with an interconnected 0V reference plane so that ground impedance is
minimized. This landfill technique may be ineffective, however if minimum width traces connect the filled areas.
Multi-layer boards offer a considerable reduction in power
supply impedance, as well as other benefits. Extending the
table we just saw, the impedance of a multi-layer power/
ground plane bus grows very small (on the order of an X or
less), assuming a W/h ratio greater than 100. Multi-layer
board designs also pay dividends in terms of greatly reduced EMI, and they provide close control of line impedances where impedance matching is important. In addition,
TABLE X. Characteristic Impedance of
Different Conductor Pairs
W/h or
Strips Over
Strips Side
by Side
TL/DD/12857 – 53
FIGURE 33. Decoupling Example
shielding benefits can be realized. For high-density, highspeed logic applications, the use of a multi-layer board is
almost mandatory. The problem with multi-layer boards is
the increased cost of design and fabrication and increased
difficulty in board repair.
8.4 Decoupling
High-speed CMOS has special decoupling and PCB layout
requirements. Adhering to these requirements will ensure
that maximum advantage is gained with CMOS devices in
system performance and EMC performance.
Local high frequency decoupling is required to supply power
to the chip when it is transitioning from a LOW to a HIGH
value. This power is necessary to charge the load capacitance or drive a line impedance.
For most power distribution networks, the typical impedance
can be between 50X and 100X. This impedance appears in
series with the load impedance and will cause a droop in the
VCC at the part. This droop limits the available voltage swing
at the local node, unless some form of decoupling is used.
This drooping of rails will cause the rise and fall times to
become elongated. Consider the example presented in Figure 29 used to help calculate the amount of decoupling necessary. This circuit utilizes an octal buffer driving a 100X
bus from a point somewhere in the middle.
Being in the middle of the bus, the driver will see two 100X
loads in parallel, or an effective impedance of 50X. To
switch the line from rail to rail, a drive of 94 mA is needed
(4.8V/50X) and more than 75 mA wil be required if all eight
lines switch at once. This instantaneous current requirement
will generate a voltage drop across the impedance of the
power lines, causing the actual VCC at the chip to droop.
This droop limits the voltage swing available to the driver.
The net effect of the voltage droop will be to lengthen device rise and fall times and slow system operation. A local
decoupling capacitor is required to act as a low impedance
supply for the driver chip during high current demands. It will
maintain the voltage within acceptable limits and keep rise
and fall times to a minimum. The necesssary values for decoupling capacitors can be calculated with the formula given in Figure 30 .
TL/DD/12857 – 54
Specify VCC Droop e 0.1V max during switching time of 4 ns
Q e CV charge on capacitor
I e C dV/dt
C e I dt/dV e 750 mA c 4 ns/0.1V e 0.030 mF
Select CB e 0.047 mF or greater
FIGURE 34. Decoupling Example
In this example, if the VCC droop is to be kept below 0.1V
and the edge rate equals 4 ns, we can calculate the value of
the decoupling capacitor by use of the charge on a capacitor equation: Q e CV. The capacitor must supply the high
demand current during the transition period and is represented by I e C(dV/dt). Rearranging this somewhat yields
C e I(dt/dV).
Now, I e 750 mA assuming all 8 outputs switch simultaneously for worst case conditions, dt e switching period or
4 ns, and dV is the specified VCC droop of 0.1V. This yields
a calculated value of 0.030 mF for the decoupling capacitor.
So, a selection of 0.047 mF or greater should be sufficient.
Higher gate count devices, e.g. microcontrollers, with high
internal edge rates present additional decoupling problems.
Capacitors often suffer from parasitic series inductive effects at high frequency. In fact, a poorly selected capacitor
can become almost entirely inductive at high frequency.
This can be counteracted by paralleling additional capacitors of lower value and corresponding higher self-resonant
frequency. Of course the lower value capacitor should be
placed closer to the chip to reduce the size of the resultant
current loop.
Inductors or ferrite beads connected in series between the
capacitors can help to minimize noise currents and voltages
from reaching the rest of the circuit.
It is good practice to distribute decoupling capacitors evenly
throughout the logic on the board, placing at least one capacitor for every package as close to the power and ground
pins as possible. The parasitic inductance in the capacitor
leads can be greatly reduced or eliminated by the use of
surface mount chip capacitors soldered directly onto the
board at the appropriate locations. Decoupling capacitors
need to be of the high K ceramic type with low equivalent
series resistance (ESR), consisting primarily of series inductance and series resistance. Capacitors using Z5U dielectric
have suitable properties and make a good choice for decoupling capacitors; they offer minimum cost and effective performance.
TL/DD/12857 – 56
FIGURE 35b. Parallel Termination
Parallel terminations are not generally recommended for
CMOS circuits due to their power consumption, which can
exceed the power consumption of the logic itself. The power consumption of parallel terminations is a function of the
resistor value and the duty cycle of the signal. In addition,
parallel termination tends to bias the output levels of the
driver towards either VCC or ground depending on which
bus the resistor is connected to. While this feature is not
desirable for driving CMOS inputs because the trip levels
are typically VCC/2, it can be useful for driving TTL inputs
where level shifting is desirable in order to interface with
CMOS devices.
AC parallel terminations work well for applications where
the increase in bus delays caused by series terminations are
undesirable. The effects of AC parallel terminations are similar to the effects of standard parallel terminations. The major difference is that the capacitor blocks any DC current
path and helps to reduce power consumption.
Thevenin terminations are not generally recommended due
to their power consumption. Like parallel terminations, a DC
path to ground is created by the terminating resistors. The
power consumption of a Thevenin termination, though, will
generally be independent of the signal duty cycle. Thevenin
terminations are more applicable for driving CMOS inputs
because they do not bias the output levels as paralleled
terminations do. It should be noted that output lines with
Thevenin terminations should not be left floating since this
will cause the undriven input levels to float between VCC
and ground, increasing power consumption.
8.5 Proper Signal Trace Layout
Although crosstalk cannot be totally eliminated, there are
some design techniques that can reduce system problems
resulting from crosstalk. In any design, the distance that
lines run adjacent to each other should be kept as short as
possible. The best situation is when the lines are perpendicular to each other. Crosstalk problems can also be reduced
by moving lines further apart or by inserting ground lines or
planes between them.
For those situations where lines must run parallel, as in address and data buses, the effects of crosstalk can be minimized by line termination. Terminating a line in its characteristic impedance reduces the amplitude of an initial crosstalk
pulse by 50%. Terminating the line will also reduce the
amount of ringing.
There are several termination schemes which may be used.
They are series, parallel, AC parallel and Thevenin terminations. AC parallel and series terminations are the most useful for low power applications since they do not consume
any DC power. Parallel and Thevenin terminations increase
DC power consumption.
Series terminations are most useful in high-speed applications where most of the loads are at the far end of the line.
Loads that are between the driver and the end of the line
will receive a two-step waveform. The first wave will be the
incident wave. The amplitude is dependent upon the output
impedance of the driver, the value of the series resistor and
the impedance of the line according to the formula:
where RS is the series Resistor
ZS is the output impedance of the driver
ZOE is the equivalent line impedance
VW e
TL/DD/12857 – 57
FIGURE 36a. AC Parallel Termination
TL/DD/12857 – 55
FIGURE 35a. Series Termination
The amplitude will be one-half the voltage swing if RS (the
series resistor) plus the output impedance (ZS) of the driver
is equal to the line impedance (ZOE). The second step of
the waveform is the reflection from the end of the line and
will have an amplitude equal to that of the first step. All
devices on the line will receive a valid level only after the
wave has propagated down the line and returned to the
driver. Therefore, all inputs will see the full voltage swing
within two times the delay of the line.
TL/DD/12857 – 58
FIGURE 36b. Thevenin Termination
8.6 Ground Bounce
8.8 Cables and Connectors
Observing either one of the following rules is sufficient to
avoid running into any of the problems associated with
ground bounce:
Several options are available to reduce EMI from a typical
ribbon cable used to interconnect pieces of equipment.
These include:
# First, use caution when driving asynchronous TTL-level
# Reduce spacing between conductors (h in Figure 37 ) by
inputs from CMOS outputs. Ground bounce glitches may
cause spurious inputs that will alter the state of nonclocked logic.
reducing the size of wires used and reducing the insulation thickness. (This could have a negative impact on
crosstalk within the cable.)
# Second, caution when running control lines (set, reset,
# Join alternate signal returns together at the connectors
load, clock, chip select) which are glitch-sensitive
through the same devices that drive data or address
When it is not possible to avoid the above conditions, there
are simple precautions available which can minimize ground
bounce noise. These are:
at each end of the cable.
# Twist parallel wire pairs in ribbon cables.
# Shield ribbon cable with metal foil cover (superior to
# Replace discrete ribbon cable with stripline flexprint cable.
In the case of joining alternate signal returns, wire N is carrying the signal current, IN, whereas its mates, N b 1 and
N a 1 wires are each carrying one half of the return currents, IN b 1 and IN a 1, respectively. Thus, radiation from
pair N and N b 1 is out of phase with radiation from pair N
and N a 1 and will tend to cancel. In practice, however, the
net radiation is reduced by 20 dB – 30 dB with 30 dB being a
good default value.
The opposite of this is to conserve signal returns by only
using one, or two, wires to service N data lines in a ribbon
cable. For data lines farther from the return line, the differential mode radiation becomes so great that this cable
tends to maximize EMI radiation. Another disadvantage of
this approach is poor impedance control in the resulting
transmission line. This could result in distortion of pulses
and causes reflections, especially for high-speed logic, and
common return impedance noise in this single ground wire.
Ideally, connectors should have negligible resistance for obvious reasons other than EMI control. They should provide
for foolproof alignment to minimize the possibility of contact
damage over time and use which would increase the resistance and be prone to vibration and shock. The required
force should be adequate to provide good mating between
contacts which will insure low resistance, but should be minimized to limit likelihood of damage. Connectors should
mate with little friction to minimize the effects of continual
disconnections and connections increasing the contact resistance with use as the contacts wear out. A contamination
free design should be used to avoid corrosion and oxidation
increasing resistance and susceptibility to shock and vibration causing intermittent contact.
# Choose package outputs that are as close to the ground
pin as possible to drive asynchronous TTL-level inputs.
# Use the lowest VCC possible or separate the power supplies.
# Use board design practices which reduce any additive
noise sources, such as crosstalk, reflections, etc.
8.7 Components
The interference effect by rectifier diodes, typically found in
power supply sections of PCBs, can be minimized by one or
more of the following measures:
# Placing a bypass capacitor in parallel with each rectifier
# Placing a resistor in series with each rectifier diode
# Placing an R-F bypass capacitor to ground from one or
both sides of each rectifier diode
# Operating the rectifier diodes well below their rated current capability
8.9 Special Considerations with Development Tools
The following set of guidelines have been compiled from the
experiences of the applications team at Embedded Technologies Division at National Semiconductor. They should
be considered additional techniques and guidelines to be
followed concurrently with the standard ones already presented. Some are general and some may be specific to development systems use.
Ground bounce prevention and minimization techniques
presented in this paper should be strictly adhered to when
using ‘373 type transparent latches on any controller’s external address/data bus. Multiple simultaneously switching
outputs could produce ground bounce significant enough to
FIGURE 37a. RF Filtering of Diode
FIGURE 37b. Connectors and Cables
TL/DD/12857 – 61
FIGURE 38a. Alternating Signal Return Minimizes Radiation
TL/DD/12857 – 62
FIGURE 38b. Single Signal Return Maximizes Radiation
to move the problem from one point in the affected signal
waveform to a different point. Thus, apparent ‘‘noise glitches’’ that caused a latch to erroneously trigger when the input data was still changing, may now come at a time when
they are non-destructive such as at a point when the input
data is now stable.
Some applications require driving the controller clock input,
CKI, with an external signal. Most emulator tools are all
clocked using a crystal network with the controller so that
the generation of the system timing is contained on the tool
itself. Consequently, there is no connection between the
emulator cable connector on the tool and the CKI pin at the
controller. However, when the emulator cable is now inserted into the target board, the target board’s clock signal traveling along the cable couples noise onto adjacent signal
lines causing symptoms pointing to an apparent failure of
the emulator tool. The recommendation is to disable the
clock drive to the CKI pin at the controller pad on the target
board whenever the emulator tool is connected. The emulator tools supply the system clock so there is no need for the
clock on the target and signal crosstalk on the emulator
cable can be greatly reduced with minimal implementation.
If one insists that the emulator tool and the target be synchronous, then bring the clock signal from the target to the
emulator tool external to the emulator cable via twisted wire
pair or coax cable. Remove the clock drive connection to
CKI at the target to prevent the signal from entering the
cable. Finally, remove crystal components on the emulator
tool to prevent problems with the signal.
Connecting boards and modules together to make a totally
unique system in which EMC was practiced is necessary to
ensure little problem with the environment. But, connecting
an emulator tool makes it an entirely new and unique system, both in physical and electrical properties. Treat the emulator tool as part of the system during the design phase
and development phase.
cause false latching. Observe good EMI planning by locating the latches as close to the controller as possible. The
use of multi-layer PCBs with good ground planes and following appropriate layout techniques is also essential, especially if emulation will be done at frequencies above 10 MHz.
With the foregoing discussions about ‘‘antenna farms’’, radiated noise and ideal connector characteristics, it becomes
obvious that wire-wrap boards and the use of IC sockets is
absolutely out of the question. The concern here is not so
much EMI affecting the outside world but EMI strangling the
operation of the module itself.
The inputs to the buffers in a ‘244 type octal buffer package
are placed adjacent or side-by-side outputs of other buffers
in the package. This configuration would tend to maximize
the crosstalk or noise coupling from the inputs to the outputs. On the other hand, the buffer inputs in a ‘544 type
package are on one side of the package and the outputs are
on the other. The use of these package types in high speed
designs can facilitate board layout to help reduce the effects of crosstalk.
Use extra heavy ground wires between emulator and target
board. Rely on the ground returns in the emulator cable for
reduction of differential-mode noise radiated from the cable
but heavy-duty help is required for reducing power line impedance in the integrated development system.
Unused controller inputs, most importantly any external interrupts and RDY, must be tied to VCC (or GND) directly or
through a pull-up (or pull-down) resistor. This not only tends
to reduce power consumption, but will avoid noise problems
triggering an unwanted action.
In order to reduce the effects of noise generated by high
speed signal changes, a sort of Frequency Management
technique might be applied. If possible, develop application
hardware and software at a slower crystal operating frequency. If ringing, crosstalk, or other combination of radiated and conducted noise problems exists, the result may be
Understanding and Eliminating EMI in Microcontroller Applications
The design and construction of an electromagnetically compatible PCB does not necessarily require a big change in
current practices. On the contrary, the implementation of
EMC principles during the design process can fit in with the
ongoing design. When EMC is designed into the board, the
requirements to shield circuitry, cables, and enclosures, as
well as other costly eleventh hour surprises, will be drastically reduced or even eliminated. Without EMC in the design
stage, production can be held up and the cost of the project
1. Alkinson, Kenn-Osburn, John-White, Donald, Taming
EMI in Microprocessor Systems , IEEE Spectrum, December 1985, pp 30-37
2. Balakrishnan, R.V., Reducing Noise on Microcomputer
Buses , National Semiconductor Application Note
337, May 1983
3. Brewer, Ron W., Test Methodology to Determine Levels
of Conducted and Radiated Emissions from Computer
Systems , EMC Technology, July 1982, p 10
Engineering Staff, Don White Consultants, Inc., The
role of Cables & Connectors in Control of EMI , EMC
Technology, July 1982, pp 16-26
Fairchild Semiconductor, Design Considerations , Fairchild Advanced CMOS Technology Logic Data
Book, 1987, pp 4-3 to 4-12
Fairchild Semiconductor, Understanding and Minimizing
Ground Bounce , Application Note DU-6, August 1987
Interference Control Technology, Introduction to EMI/
RFI/EMC , Course Notebook on Electromagnetic
Compatibility, August 1988
Violette, Michael F. and J.L., EMI Control in the Design
and Layout of Printed Circuit Boards , EMC Technology, March-April 1986, pp 19-32
Violette, Michael F., Curing Electromagnetic Interference , Radio-Electronics, November 1985, pp 50-56
Wakeman, Larry, High-speed-CMOS Designs Address
Noise and I/O Levels , National Semiconductor Application Note 375, September 1984
White, Donald R.J., EMI Control Methods and Techniques . Electromagnetic Interference and CompatibilityÐVol 3, copyright 1988 by Interference Control
1. Life support devices or systems are devices or
systems which, (a) are intended for surgical implant
into the body, or (b) support or sustain life, and whose
failure to perform, when properly used in accordance
with instructions for use provided in the labeling, can
be reasonably expected to result in a significant injury
to the user.
National Semiconductor
1111 West Bardin Road
Arlington, TX 76017
Tel: 1(800) 272-9959
Fax: 1(800) 737-7018
2. A critical component is any component of a life
support device or system whose failure to perform can
be reasonably expected to cause the failure of the life
support device or system, or to affect its safety or
National Semiconductor
Fax: a49 (0) 180-530 85 86
Email: europe.support @ nsc.com
Deutsch Tel: a49 (0) 180-530 85 85
English Tel: a49 (0) 180-532 78 32
Fran3ais Tel: a49 (0) 180-532 93 58
Italiano Tel: a49 (0) 180-534 16 80
National Semiconductor
Hong Kong Ltd.
13th Floor, Straight Block,
Ocean Centre, 5 Canton Rd.
Tsimshatsui, Kowloon
Hong Kong
Tel: (852) 2737-1600
Fax: (852) 2736-9960
National Semiconductor
Japan Ltd.
Tel: 81-043-299-2308
Fax: 81-043-299-2408
National does not assume any responsibility for use of any circuitry described, no circuit patent licenses are implied and National reserves the right at any time without notice to change said circuitry and specifications.
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Related manuals

Download PDF