INFORMATION NOTE ODW 9.05 TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT BRANCH TRACTOR WIRE LOADER Introduction This Information Note is one of a series derived from a Technical Development Branch (TDB) Outdoor Workshop (ODW). It is produced as a guide to part of a harvesting system suitable for use in small scale broadleaved woodlands. ODWs are a TDB initiative designed to offer practical advice to practical people through presentation, demonstration and user guidance. The ODW programme will involve repeating trials and introducing new systems around Great Britain, so that a wide range of sites, systems and practitioners can be included. Information has been gathered from equipment and method trials based at a single location. This information therefore must be taken as indicative only. Variation could be expected for other operations where factors such as terrain, crop specification, product specification, operating distances or operator efficiency differ. • Caddy line operation of the winch allows the operator to follow the load as it is extracted from the wood, from a safe position. The System • Unloading is done by the use of a lifting bar and winch boom. The tractor wire loader system (Figure 1) is based on an agricultural tractor (65 hp/4WD) fitted with an 'A' frame, pto-driven winch and loading arm. A timber trailer is attached to the draw bar of the tractor. The operator pulls out the winch rope and skid cone to the produce. He then operates the winch, using a caddy line attached to the winch, to pull the produce out of the wood. The boom attached to the ‘A’frame allows the operator to lift and position the load on the trailer. A 1998 case study (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3) gave an output for the extraction system of 0.76 m³/shr. This was based on an average winching distance of 10 m and a total extraction distance of 150 m. Skid loads averaged 0.085 m³ with a mean tractor load of 1.1 m³ achieved. Costs including felling varied between £24.64/m³ at full costing to £ 8.43/m³ if costed on a marginal basis. Various costing options may be used. The highest (A) assumes all machines and equipment are purchased new and all labour charged. The intermediate costing (B) assumes machinery and equipment has been purchased second hand and all labour is charged. The lowest costing (C) assumes that certain elements, such as capital cost of the tractor and tractor operator are not charged. The system has the following attributes: • Low capital cost. • No excessive lifting of products - all lifting done by the winch/boom. Safe and ergonomic. 1 Figure 1 System Layout Key A: Tractor/wire winch loader B: Timber trailer C: Winch line and skid cone D: Produce E: Operator with caddy line Table 1 Case Study: Site and Crop Characteristics Soil Free draining clay loam over shale. Depth to 200 cm+ Species Vegetation Well developed herb layer with sporadic bramble, shrub layer and some regen Form Terrain Slope 15% - 45% with occasional steep snap falling to a level area adjacent to a stream Thinning volume (m³/ha) Access Loosely metalled farm tracks running up/down hill on either side of wood. Roughly surfaced track in upper wood. Unsurfaced narrow track in lower wood. Average tree (m³) 2 MB. syc/ash/beech oak Age(yrs) Regen130 yrs Some good stems, but generally poor, squirrel damage. Average of 50 across site 0.113 Average Piece (m³) 0.024 Table 2 Case Study: System Description and Costings Item Specification Capital Cost (£) Cost (£/hr) (A=Full, B=Intermediate, C=Marginal) A B C 22 000 4.82 1.87 0.50 2 500 0.39 0.39 0.39 Tractor MF 265, 4x4 Wire loader 'A' framed Star Wire Loader, with optional hydraulic swinging boom. Trailer Nyvan single axle double wheeled trailer. Adjustable bed and bolster pins. Operator £64.00/day on 8 hour day ------- 8.00 8.00 ---- Felling Man £8.00/hr. Saw £1.00/hr ------- 9.00 9.00 9.00 22.21 19.26 9.89 Total Table 3 Case Study: Outputs and Unit Costs Cost (£/m³) Study Area Output (m³/shr) A B C Felling 1.24 7.26 7.26 7.26 Extraction 0.76 17.38 13.50 1.17 24.64 20.76 8.43 Total System Cost shr = Standard Hour (Includes allowances of 17% for Personal Needs and Rest, and 16% for Other Work such as refuelling). All outputs are for skilled and accustomed operators. • The fellers were inexperienced in the system. This meant that the presentation was not ideal. Many piles had produce as bearers or contained too few/many pieces for optimum working. Comments on Trial Performance A simple and effective ergonomically designed system for extraction of timber using a tractor mounted winch and trailer. The use of the wire loader greatly reduces the manual handling of loading and unloading timber. • Brash left in piles on, or in front of stacks slowed chokering. Outputs for this system were reduced due to the following factors: Presentation of produce at c. 45°to the rack, on bearers, helps with chokering and extraction. • The local market required 2.3 m billets. This length was shorter than the optimum 3 m to 4 m for the system. Although this is a relatively simple system, only persons with correct training and relevant experience should undertake this work. • The shape of the billets was poor. Bent material prevented good stacking on the trailer and consequently the unloading mechanism could not perform properly. 3 Acknowledgements Associated TDB Publications Information from ODWs will be published by the Forestry Commission. Associated publications available now are: Thanks are expressed to: • • • Report 03/95 Evaluation of Tractor Based Wire Loader Forwarder • Technical Note 4/97 Wire Loader Horse Forwarder Sir Henry Studholme for use of the site. Tony Appleby, Llysfasi College. Technical Development Branch Equipment Supplier Develops, evaluates and promotes safe and efficient equipment and methods of work, maintains output information and provides advice on forest operations. Fuelwood Harvesting Ltd Claywood Beausale Warwick CV35 7NX Tel:Fax: 01926 484673 Forest Research Technical Development Branch Ae Village Dumfries DG1 1QB Tel: 01387 860264 Fax: 01387 860386 e-mail: tdb.ae@forestry.gsi.gov.uk Please telephone for current prices Crown Copyright 2002 1400A/2/02 9.05 This Report is published to advise Forestry Commission staff but for information is made available to the forest industry. It is not intended as an endorsement or approval by the Forestry Commission of any product or service to the exclusion of others which may be available. 4
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
advertising