Benjamin and Brecht - Chess History Center

Benjamin and Brecht - Chess History Center
CHESS NEWS
Benjamin and Brecht
Attrition in friendship
D
uring the summer months of 1934,
Walter Benjamin stayed with Bertolt
Brecht in Svendborg, Denmark. The
charm of Erdmut Wizisla’s book, Walter
Benjamin and Bertolt Brecht: The Story of a
Friendship (reviewed above), is deepened by
a set of three photographs showing the two
absorbed in the early stages of a single chess
game. The first (right) is well known and was
used as the backdrop at a recent conference
prompted by Wizisla’s book (from which all correspondence citations here are taken). The
second photograph, not shown here, is one move further on: Benjamin, moving a knight, cups
it in his hand while pondering the square on which it should land. The third photograph, taken
from behind Benjamin (below), is the key.
The change of angle reveals a black pawn,
which is obscured by the queen in the other
two photographs. This small detail opens the
game to interpretation.
It is now possible to represent the position
from the first photograph. Brecht has the white
pieces, Benjamin is black. The position is distinctive and suggests that both are more than
‘idlers in the garden of chess’. The configuration of the central pawns – white’s placed on
the dark squares and black’s on the white squares forming a chain – proves sufficient to identify
the game as having begun with the opening known as the French Defence. (Brecht, with the
white pieces, opened the game by moving his king’s pawn two squares forward, to which
Benjamin replied by moving his equivalent pawn, but only one square forward.) Moreover, it
is possible to reconstruct these first moves. In
English algebraic notation:
1 e2–e4 e7–e6 2 d2–d4 d7–d5 3 e4–e5
c7–c5 4 f2–f4 c5–c4 5 g2–g3 Bf8–b4
check 6 Nb1–d2 Bb4×d2 7 Bc1×d2 f7–f6
8 e5×f6 Qd8×f6
Slight variations in move order are possible.*
It should be underscored that the possibility of
reconstructing the game means that the position on the board reveals a certain logic: the
play is beyond that of the beginner, or ‘woodpusher’. Wizisla records that the daily routine
62
R a d i c a l P h i l o s o p hy 16 1 ( M ay / Ju n e 2 010 )
in Denmark (to which Benjamin returned in 1936 and 1938) included ‘after a meal, one or
two lengthy games of chess’. These games were played without accompanying conversation,
but the significance this repeated, taciturn struggle held for each opponent can be gauged by
the references we find in various items of correspondence. Brecht writes twice to Margarete
Steffin about the new chess set he had purchased cheaply: ‘My chess pieces are as big as
Benjamin’s.’
Besides regular play, the choice of the French indicates possible contact with the chess
theory of the time. First played in a correspondence match between Paris and London in 1834,
the theory of the French was largely developed in the 1910s and 1920s by Aron Nimzovich (or
Nimzowitsch), whilst the Latvian grandmaster was living in exile in Copenhagen. Nimzovich
is the author of what is generally recognized as the first modernist work of chess theory, the
1925 Mein System. (Marcel Duchamp is reported to have said, ‘Nimzowich is my God’.)
Brecht’s third move (3 e4–e5) initiates the Advance variation, also championed by Nimzowich
when facing this defence.
Here is the position from the third photograph. In the interval, Brecht has moved his bishop
twice (d2–e3, e3–f2) and made two pawn moves
(one of which, the move of the rook’s pawn, is
weak). Benjamin, generating persistent threats
against Brecht’s pawns, has developed both
knights to strong squares. It is Benjamin to
move. The following sequence is likely:
9 Bd2–e3 Ng8–e7 10 h2–h4 Ne7–f5 11 Be3–f2
Nb8–c6 12 c2–c3
The final position is roughly equal (material is level), but Benjamin’s play between the
photos has been the more focused. Benjamin
appears to be the stronger player, though in a
letter to Gretel Adorno in 1938 he admits that
he ‘seldom wins’. Perhaps the competitive Brecht, who would hustle for gingerbread or whisky,
practised assiduously in the intervening four years. In 1936, Steffin alludes to his improving
play: ‘[now] he frequently beats [Hanns] Eisler’.
Brecht has moved only one of his remaining pieces, the bishop; the rest wait on their
original squares. We are provided with a grounding reference for Benjamin’s diary entry from
12 July 1934. There he records Brecht’s musings on the new game they should devise for
Karl Korsch’s visit: ‘where the function of every piece changes after it has stood in the same
square for a while: it should either become stronger or weaker. This way the game doesn’t
develop, it stays the same for too long.’
If the preceding play here is indicative, then the game in the photos may indeed have
stayed the same for a long time. The dynamic tension in position has twice been prematurely
released – Benjamin’s pawn move c5–c4 and Brecht’s exchange of pawns on the f6 square.
The white pawns and black pawns are now locked in place across the centre of the board: the
pawn structure acts as a barrier, keeping the opposing pieces apart and leading to a drawn-out
game. It is even possible that Benjamin’s seventh move was 7 … f7–f5 seeking total closure
of the centre (Brecht would then have captured on f6 en passant).
Wizisla cites a letter to Benjamin from Steffin: ‘As far as your chess-playing is concerned,
I still remember your “attrition tactics” [Ermüdungstaktik]. Do you still practise them?’ (27
*As depicted in the diagrams, English algebraic notation labels each column of the chessboard with a letter (a–h)
and numbers each rank (1–8) beginning at the bottom left-hand corner from white’s point of view. Each square is
thereby identified through a coordinate: white’s queen’s rook stands on square ‘a1’, his queen on ‘d1’, etc. Each piece
is accorded a letter: K for king, Q for queen, R for rook, B for bishop, N for knight (the pawns receive no initial).
Each move is then numbered in turn and notated by starting with the piece moved followed by the coordinates for
its original square and ending with the destination square. Moves that capture opposing pieces are marked by the ×
symbol. ‘1 e2–e4’ records that for his first move, Brecht moved his king’s pawn two squares forward.
R a d i c a l P h i l o s o p hy 16 1 ( M ay / Ju n e 2 010 )
63
October 1937). This judgement on his preferred style is corroborated by Helene Weigel’s
teasing: ‘I would like to know how you are … with all your unfriendly peculiarities. I have
begun to learn how to play chess, and so there would be an opportunity for you to annoy me
to death’ (20 January 1935).
If this is a typical game, then this would be a fair description of its likely course; the play
allowed its full, grinding character given that no chess clock can be seen in the photo. Without
such a device to regulate the speed of reply, Benjamin sank into thought. As Brecht wrote in
1936, when inviting him back to stay in Denmark, ‘The chessboard lies orphaned, and every
half hour a tremor of remembrance runs through it: that was when you made your moves.’
In the second half of 1941, on learning belatedly of his friend’s fate, Brecht wrote four
poems in tribute to Benjamin. One, a brief quatrain, begins with a word similar to Steffin’s, who
had also died shortly before. These lines belong with the photos and game considered here.
Ermattungstaktik war’s, was dir behagte
Am Schachtisch sitzend in des Birnbaums Schatten.
Der Feind, der dich von deinen Büchern jagte,
läßt sich von unsereinem nicht ermatten.
‘An Walter Benjamin, der sich auf der Flucht vor Hitler entleibte’
Tactics of attrition are what you enjoyed
At the chessboard seated in the pear tree’s shade.
The Enemy then drove you from your books;
The likes of us? Ground down, outplayed.
‘To Walter Benjamin Who Killed Himself While Fleeing Hitler’
As Stanley Mitchell noted in his introduction to the New Left Books edition of Benjamin’s
Understanding Brecht, this pessimism has its dialectical complement in Benjamin’s 1939 commentary on Brecht’s poem ‘Legend of the Origin of the Book Tao Te Ching on Lao Tzu’s Way
into Exile’. Here, Ermattungstaktik patiently wear down the hard and the imposing as ‘yielding
water in motion … wears down granite and porphyry’. Benjamin’s concluding sentence of his
‘Commentaries on Poems by Brecht’ caps this thought with its vital component: ‘Whoever
wants to make the hard thing give way should miss no opportunity for friendship.’
Note
The chess diagrams were prepared using Diag Transfer 3.0.1 by Alain Blaisot. Photographs courtesy of
Akademie der Künste, Bertolt-Brecht-Archiv, Berlin (photographer unknown).
radicalradical
philosophy
philosophy
radical
radical
philosophy
philosophy
subscribe now…
www.radicalphilosophy.com
64
R a d i c a l P h i l o s o p hy 16 1 ( M ay / Ju n e 2 010 )
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertising