ARC Discovery Projects Part E only

ARC Discovery Projects Part E only
Choosing when to be sexual: clonal and sexual reproduction in a population of honey bees
The ‘Paradox of sex’ arises from the fact that a mother shares the genome of her sexually-produced
offspring equally with her mating partner. Mothers can double their reproductive success by
dispensing with the services of males, yet sexual reproduction is near universal in animals [1]. The
Paradox remains a conundrum because though most authors would acknowledge that genetic
recombination is the key to sex, there is no universal explanation of why recombination is useful
[2]. Crucial for exploring the Paradox experimentally are systems where sex is facultative, so the
circumstances in which females clone themselves and when they reproduce sexually can be
Recent work has revealed that queens of the ant Cataglyphis cursor have evolved an interesting
system that utilizes the benefits of sex while paying few of the costs [3]. Workers are produced
sexually, so that colonies are genetically diverse, providing benefits of disease resistance and an
enhanced labour allocation system [4]. In contrast, new queens are almost exclusively produced
asexually. The benefit of this system for queens is that they gain genetic immortality by cloning
themselves, while colonies reap the main benefit of sex – genetically diverse offspring.
A complicating factor in the Paradox is inter-sexual genomic conflict - mechanisms evolved by
males that manipulate the ability of females to choose to clone themselves. For example, in the little
fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata, queens do clone themselves, but in this species the males ‘fight
back’, and the female genome is eliminated in eggs destined to become males [5].
These ant studies have revealed amazing phenomena, and would be perfect for exploring broader
questions concerning the Paradox if they were amenable to experimental manipulations such as
artificial insemination and if a sequenced and annotated genome were available. But these
advantages are not found in the ants. Fortunately we have recently shown that the Cape honey bee
of South Africa (Apis mellifera capensis, hereafter ‘Cape’), has a similarly bizarre sexual system to
the ants [6], but for these bees a complete genomic sequence and genetic map are available.
Additionally, they are manipulable by beekeeping techniques and their behaviour can be observed
directly in observation hives.
The aim of this project is to utilize Cape honey bee queens to discover genetic and social
constraints that prevent social insect queens from using parthenogenesis to clone themselves during
reproductive swarming. In achieving this aim we will make a significant contribution to the
question of the origins and maintenance of sex in haplo-diploid insects and beyond.
Two types of parthenogenesis. Two kinds of parthenogenesis are observed in Hymenoptera (Figure
1). Arrhenotokous parthenogenesis occurs when one of the haploid pronuclei of Meiosis II divides
mitotically and the egg develops as a
haploid male.
In thelytokous
Parthenogenesi Asexual reproduction
parthenogenesis, two of the pronuclei
combine to produce a diploid zygote,
Diploid female from unfertilised egg
as if one of the maternal pronuclei
Haploid male from unfertilised egg
acted as a sperm. In most honey bee
Males haploid females diploid
populations, only the arrhenotokous
form of parthenogenesis is known and
Parthenogenesis with meiosis
when queens or workers lay
Parthenogenesis without meiosis
unfertilised eggs, male bees are
Genetic crossover
produced by this means. In the Cape
bee, queens produce males arrhenotokously, but when unmated workers lay eggs the eggs usually
develop as females thelytokously.
Why thelytoky matters. When a honey bee colony reproduces by swarming, the workers construct
about 10 ‘queen cells’ that are peanut shaped and hang down from the comb. The queen lays an
egg in each of the cells, and the workers lavishly feed the resulting larvae with royal jelly so they
develop as queens. In normal honey bee populations the workers never lay eggs in queen cells
because their eggs develop as males. Even if they did, the eggs would likely be eaten (‘policed’) by
other workers [7]. However, we have recently shown that in Cape colonies, both queens and
workers lay in queen cells, and that 23 of 39 new queens were in fact thelytokous daughters of
workers [6]. Intriguingly, only 3 of the 16 queen-laid queens in our study were parthenogens, while
Most workers and queens
All (?) drones
Small number of queens
Something very weird
happens here
Meiosis I
Primary oocytes
Sexual reproduction
Diploid inseminated mother queen
Figure 1. Types of reproduction in the Cape queen
the rest were produced sexually. So why don’t Cape queens do what the ant queens do and their
daughter workers do and reproduce thelytokously when producing daughter queens?
It’s not because they can’t. If virgin Cape queens are anaesthetized with carbon dioxide they will,
like all other honey bee queens, commence laying unfertilised eggs. Unlike queens of other
subspecies, many eggs of virgin Cape queen develop as females thelytokously. We have genotyped
male and female offspring of virgin queens at multiple microsatellite loci on two chromosomes.
This study showed some remarkable phenomena (see progress report on DP 0664627). First, while
the queens often made mistakes, they mostly laid appropriate eggs in the appropriate cells:
arrhenotokous eggs destined to produce males in male-sized brood cells, and thelytokous eggs
destined to be workers in worker-sized cells. Consider the implications of this. Because honey bee
eggs are laid with their pro-nuclei arrested at metaphase II, arrhenotokous or thelytokous
development occurs only after the egg is laid [Fig 1 and ref 8]. Our preliminary study showed that
Cape queens are able to influence the kind of parthenogenesis that occurs in their eggs seemingly at
will and post partum. Second, we showed that, unlike Cape workers, which have a form of
parthenogenesis that greatly reduces meiotic recombination and therefore preserves heterozygosity
[9], virgin Cape queens don’t do this: there is no reduction in the rate of recombination.
Sex determination – why recombination matters. In honey bees sex is determined by the
combination of paternal and maternal alleles at a single locus, the Complementary Sex Determiner
(csd) [10]. If the individual is heterozygous at the csd it is female. If the individual is homozygous
at the csd a diploid male develops, but these are removed by workers at the first larval instar and are
therefore non viable [11]. If the individual is haploid and therefore hemizygous at the csd, it is
male. The csd encodes a Transformer-type protein, which is enormously polymorphic [12] due to
diversifying selection [10]. Beye et al [10] propose that the protein encoded by csd must be
heteromorphic in order to initiate female sexual development, and monomorphic to produce a male.
Csd probably acts on an unknown gene, which controls alternative splicing of double sex. One
splice variant dsxM initiates male development while two others dsxF1 and dsxF2 initiate female
development [13].
Sex determination via a single
complementary sex locus has
important consequences.
sexually producing honey bee
populations we predict that
b a b
a a b b
selection will act to increase
recombination rates at the csd
because recombination increases
the probability of heterozygosity
at the csd. As expected, the
region around csd shows a fourb a
a b
a a
b b
fold increase in recombination rate
relative to the genome-wide
mechanism for generating and
maintaining diversity at the csd
what is
Under thelytoky
of meiotic
Figure 2. In thelytokous parthenogenesis with central fusion
the two central meiotic products fuse while the terminal products we expect a 1/3
products (grey) form polar bodies and die. If there is reduction in heterozygosity at any
recombination between a locus and the centromere (left) locus distal to a crossover [Figure
alleles become randomly placed on the four chromatids at 2 and ref 14]. Thus in thelytokous
meiosis I. (I have drawn the crossover for the middle pair but populations we expect reduced
it could equally be for the outer pair.) Counter intuitively, this levels of recombination to evolve,
means that for any locus heterozygous in the mother, there is at least on chromosome 3 which
a 1/3 (not 1/2) chance that an offspring will be homozygous. carries the sex locus. Studies of
This ratio arises because if we chose any one chromatid at recombination rates in Cape
random, two of the three remaining chromatids will carry the
workers show that they are at least
alternate allele. If there is no recombination (right), the
an order of magnitude lower than
offspring remain heterozygous. See [14] for details and more
in sexual queen meiosis [9],
discussion of how the 1/3 probability arises.
strongly suggesting that selection
for reduced recombination has
indeed occurred in thelytokous Cape workers. However, our recent work has shown that this
reduction in recombination does not occur when virgin Cape queens reproduce thelytokously (see
progress report).
‘Clonal’ thelytokous lineages of reproductive parasites. Thelytoky gives the opportunity for
females to forgo sex and produce female offspring like themselves. And indeed, some Cape
workers take advantage of their parthenogenetic abilities to found lineages of reproductive parasites
that enter nests and parasitize them with their eggs [16]. One lineage, originating from a single
worker who lived in the early 1990s, has killed hundreds of thousands of colonies in what can
accurately be described as a social cancer [17]. This lineage is not unique, and others infest the
honey bee population of South Africa [6]. All these lineages have an Achilles’ heel, for without sex
they will gradually lose heterozygosity via recombination (Figure 2). The current dominant lineage
has delayed the inevitable decline into homozygosity by a massively reduced rate of recombination
relative to other honey bees [9], but eventually any ancient lineage will end up with too little
diversity to compete with younger more heterozygous lineages.
Genetics of thelytoky. In many arthropods thelytoky is induced by endosymbionts such as
Wolbachia [18]. However although Wolbachia is present in Cape populations its distribution across
sexes demonstrates that it is not responsible for thelytoky [19]. Rather, in Cape workers the
thelytoky/arrhenotoky switch is controlled by a single gene, Th, which is most likely a homolog of
Grainy Head of Drosophila melanogaster [20]. This gene has multiple pleiotropic effects in
workers, including early onset of oviposition, large ovaries, and production of queen like
pheromones. Its expression in queens is unknown, and it is not known if it causes the reduced
recombination rates observed in the lineage studied by Baudry et al [9].
This project will use the Cape honey bee to examine the Paradox of Sex. The Cape honey bee is an
ideal study species because queens can produce asexual eggs that develop as males or females or
sexual eggs that produce females. We can therefore examine the conditions in which queens choose
to share their genomes with males – and when they don’t.
First raised in the early 1970s [21], the Paradox of Sex remains a central problem in both genetics
and evolutionary biology. (An entire issue of Nature Reviews Genetics (vol 3, issue 4) was devoted
to it in 2002.) Recent reports of inter-sexual genomic conflict in ants have exposed a new
dimension to the complexities of Paradox of Sex in the lives of social insects [22], and this relates
to male-female genomic conflict. Resolution of such may in fact be the key to the maintenance of
sex. Queen genomes clone themselves, male genomes fight back by eliminating female genomes
[5] — astonishing truths that seemed unbelievable as little as 3 years ago. This project will explore
what I suspect are similar (but different) phenomena in the genetically tractable Cape honey bee.
Importantly, this project will go far further than just revealing astounding phenomena, as has been
done in the ants. Rather, we will unravel the genetic mechanisms behind them: the meiotic
processes that potentially lead to the elimination of male genomes and the genetic system that
reduces recombination in thelytokous lineages of parasitic workers. Thus we will show how the
parasites are able to flourish for many generations [9] before (we assume) they finally peter out
from the genetic load imposed by increasing homozygosity. I argue that Cape bees provide an
outstanding opportunity to examine these remarkable new phenomena using the full suite of
genomic tools available, and that this stellar opportunity should not be passed up lightly.
Addressing interesting problems and enhancing the knowledge base of social insects and genetics
We will:
• Make a fundamental advance in the genetics of sex determination by explaining how a
homozygous haplo-diploid insect can be female – a genetic impossibility with our current
understanding of sex determination in honey bees.
• Determine the meiotic origin of homozygous individuals that are seen in about 5% of queen
progeny during reproductive swarming. These individuals probably arise from the duplication of a
maternal pro-nucleus, but does this arise after the elimination of the male genome? If not, is the
sperm necessary to activate the process? The Journal Club editor of Nature [23] and the authors
commissioned by Current Biology [24] to prepare a commentary article on our paper [6]
emphasized that the origin of these homozygous individuals is an outstanding question that
demands a thorough genetic analysis.
• Show how alternative means of parthenogenesis (thelytoky and arrhenotoky) can co-exist in the
same species, and indeed the same individual, and how queens can regulate the kind of
parthenogenesis that occurs in their unfertilised eggs.
• Discover the genetic mechanisms that suppress recombination in the clonal worker lineages that
fail to be expressed in queens. In the wasp, Trichogamma, heterozygosity is maintained because
thelytoky is apomictic [25], which is not the case in Cape workers [9] or Cataglyphis ants [14].
Understanding how Cape workers suppress recombination should provide insights into a
fundamental aspect of chromosome mechanics, and could potentially provide an important advance
in our ability to maintain asexual lineages of automictic bio-control agents from the genus
Lysiphlebus. More broadly, genetic recombination is fundamental to meiosis and indeed eukaryotic
life. This project is likely to reveal general principles about how rates of recombination are
regulated in eukaryotes.
The project is innovative because we will be the first to address fundamental aspects of the paradox
of sex and genomic conflict and cooperation in insect societies. I believe that the Cape bee is the
only social insect that is known to show the fascinating phenomena of thelytoky, asexual and sexual
queen replacement, genetic suppression of meiotic recombination and reproductive parasitism by
workers. Importantly, unlike ants, Cape bees can be artificially inseminated, and a complete
genomic sequence is available so that chromosomal markers and genes related to sex determination
are already characterized. Thus we will be able to directly visualize the behaviour of genomes in
conflict by fluorescently labeling chromosomes (including that related to sex determination) and
observing their fate during meiosis and syngamy.
To our knowledge this project will be the first attempt to artificially inseminate a social insect
worker. Unlike all other honey bees, Cape workers have a spermatheca [26], and can thus
potentially be inseminated. This project will be the first to use FISH to determine ploidy in the
honey bee, and the first to use FISH to observe the cytogenetic events during thelytokous and
arrhentokous meiosis of Cape queens.
Priority area – Safeguarding Australia, Protecting industries from exotic pests and diseases
Theytokous lineages of Cape workers are reproductive parasites of all other A. mellifera and have
caused the death of hundreds of thousands of commercial colonies in South Africa, and continue to
cause massive problems [27]. The Australian Honey Bee Industry Council and AQIS list the Cape
bee as an exotic pest likely to cause significant damage to the honey industry if established here.
Establishment could occur via an illegal importation of breeding stock from South Africa, or (more
likely), a queenless swarm arriving in a container on aircraft or shipping. Honey bee swarms are
occasionally found in Australian ports. Understanding the genetic mechanisms behind Cape bee
thelytoky will help prepare the Australian industry and agencies to deal with an incursion of Cape
bees should this occur.
General cytological techniques. We will follow Yu and Omholt [28]. The colony to be studied will
be transferred to an observation hive. The hive will be fitted with an artificial plastic comb that
allows individual eggs to be removed straight after an oviposition is observed without opening the
colony [i.e. the cell bases are exposed at the back of the colony and can be removed, 29]. Eggs will
be removed within a minute of being laid, and either fixed immediately by placing them in a
refrigerator, or allowed to develop for various times at 34.5 C and high RH. To visualize both
maternal and sperm nuclei (if present), we will inject the eggs with 1 mg/ml of the nuclear stain
Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) in 0.9% NaCl solution at the anterior pole and incubate them for > 1.5 hr at
4 C. Ooplasm will be removed from the posterior end of the egg with a pipette using a
microinjector, and the egg gently flattened with a cover slip before observation under a florescent
To determine the ploidy of embryos we will use Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Eggs
will be prepared as in [30] and probed with fluorescently labeled 4.5 kBP oligonucleotides designed
from the honey bee genome. Diploid eggs will reveal two dots per nucleus whereas haploid eggs
will show one [30]. We will develop two probes: i) the csd itself and ii) a gene such as Abdominala, which is unlikely to show variation and is the right length. Abdominal-a will provide a definitive
test of ploidy. The csd may show duplications or other important phenomenon that cannot be
predicted – or may not be suitable at all because it is too variable.
Mated queen thelytoky. Last year we found that 3 of 16 queen-laid queen larvae were homozygous
at all loci studied, even though these same loci were heterozygous in their mother [6]. We have
recently confirmed this finding with independent samples (BP Oldroyd et al unpublished). These
individuals are a profound mystery, for homozygosity should lead to the development of a male,
and loss of homozygosity at multiple loci in one meiosis is incompatible with the mode of thelytoky
observed in virgin queens [31] or in workers [9].
To understand the origin of these individuals we will first need to identify queens that produce
them. Thus we will inspect ‘wild’ Cape colonies, during the swarming season, find the queen in
each, and take a clipping of their wings for genotyping [32]. From all colonies where queen cells
are present we will remove the cells, with a target of obtaining 2-300 queen cells from 20-30
colonies. We shall also sample worker pupae from each colony. Wing clips and all larvae and
pupae will be genotyped at 10 microsatellite loci. By this means we will identify i) queens that
produce homozygous female offspring; ii) any queens that are themselves homozygous at all loci.
This will allow us to obtain reliable estimates of the frequency of parthenogenetic reproduction
when queens produce queens, and of the proportion of these (if any) in the adult queen population.
Because we will need to exclude the possibility that homozygous individuals are in fact haploid
males laid in error, it will be necessary to sex homozygous individuals morphologically. Female
pupae are easily distinguished from males by their smaller eyes. Larvae will be sexed by
microscopic examination of the sternum of the posterior segments [33].
We will devise a trace back system so that we can return to particular surveyed colonies with either
of the two kinds of interesting queens. We will confirm that genotyped queen is in residence by her
clipped wing. If present we will transfer her and her colony to Stellenbosch for further study. We
will transfer these colonies into modified observation hives as described above, and collect eggs
from queen, worker and drone cells. We will breed from these queens and inseminate the offspring
with related males in an attempt to develop a line where queens regularly produce offspring
These queens will enable us to undertake the following studies:
• Origin of the homozygous queen cell contents We know that unmated queens can produce
heterozygous eggs by thelytoky, but the only thelytokous eggs that we have observed so far in
mated queens were completely homozygous. It seems likely that these arise from fusion of a
duplicated maternal pronucleus that forms after competition between maternal and paternal pronuclei within the egg. This hypothesis is extremely difficult to test directly. However two
approaches should go a long way towards understanding of the system. First, we will examine
the frequency of homozygosity in queen progeny and worker progeny of a queen known to
produce queens parthenogenetically. Both castes should be produced by the same sexual
syngamy (Fig 1). If the anomalous homozygous individuals are only found among queen
progeny, we will infer that queens make an active choice to lay thelytokously in queen cells, but
this is somehow derailed by the presence of sperm nuclei. Second, we will examine a time series
of eggs laid in queen cells 10, 30, 60 and 90 min post oviposition cytologically. Maternal
gamete fusion after competition with sperm pro-nuclei will be inferred if sperm pronuclei are
either absent or die during syngamy. Suitable control eggs from an arrhenotokous population
will also be examined.
• Progeny of homozygous queens If we find or breed any adult homozygous queens we will induce
them to lay in queen cells in a colony set up to mimic conditions prior to swarming. Eggs will be
examined genetically to determine their parentage and cytologically to infer the mechanisms by
which pro-nuclei fuse. If the queen progeny of homozygous queens are themselves produced
thelytokously, then this would indicate that in addition to the clonal lineages of reproductively
parasitic workers that infest the Cape population, there are also queen lineages that propagate
asexually while still retaining sexually produced workers.
• Do any homozygous queens become adults? The survey and associated genotyping will show if
any adult queens are themselves homozygous. This is important because it will show that
queens as well as workers can establish parthenogenetic lineages. We will then see if, like C.
cursor, the homozygous queens use sex to produce workers, but produce queen offspring
What is the reproductive strategy of queens that are daughters of workers? We will obtain
queenless colonies of Cape workers and rear queens from worker-laid eggs by transferring the eggs
into queenless colonies of A. scutellata for rearing. The resulting queens will be allowed to mate
naturally. Microsatellite analysis of worker offspring of these queens will allow us to determine if
they reproduce thelytokously like their worker mothers or sexually like normal queens.
Does the th locus cause a reduction in recombination? The locus that controls the
thelytoky/arrhenotoky switch in workers has several pleiotropic effects that are related to the ability
of workers to become reproductively active: queen-like pheromone production and early activation
of ovaries [20]. Could another effect of this locus
be inhibition of recombination?
We will
backcross a F1 th/+ queen to a single th male. We
will then confine marked individual worker
backcross offspring (th/th or th/+) in cages with 50
workers of the A. m. scutellata subspecies, which
is universally arrhenotokous [16]. We will record
when eggs first appear. We will terminate the
experiment after 10 days and genotype each
marked worker to find 20 microsatellite loci on
Under thlytoky with central fusion the each of chromosomes 3 and 13 that are
number of chiasmata can be inferred heterozygous. Chromosome 3 carries the csd and
from ‘half tetrad analysis’ [9]. In this chromosome 13 carries th. Individuals that are
example, the mother is heterozygous at 6 th/th will lay thelytokous eggs early and these
microsatellite loci along a chromosome. eggs will be heterozygous at some loci.
Thelytokous offspring will also be Individuals that are th/+ will produce haploid eggs
heterozygous these loci unless a cross arrhenotokously. These will be monomorphic at
over has occurred. Here we can infer all loci (any eggs with genotypes incompatible
that two crossovers occurred in the with being laid by the marked worker will be
meiosis that produced the daughter – one discarded). If the th allele causes a reduction in
between B and C and another between E recombination events, all diploid individuals will
show an order of magnitude reduction in the
and F [9].
recombination frequency expected based on the
known map distances [34]. Chromosome 3 is 3.5 Morgans and Chromosome 13 is 2.8 M, so we
expect an average of 3.5 and 2.8 crossovers on chromosomes 3 and 13 respectively. We can
compare the number of chiasmata observed genetically (see diagram) to the expected number [9].
If th affects recombination frequencies we will expect an order of magnitude reduction in the
expected recombination frequency in all diploid offspring. If the recombination suppressor is
unrelated to th we will find that not all of the diploid progeny will show a reduction in
recombination frequency. These individuals will have inherited the th/th genotype and so are
thelytokous, but will be heterozygous at other loci that control the rate of recombination.
Artificial insemination of workers. We will mature 20-30 marked Cape workers each in a cage of
50 A.m. scutellata workers until they are 5 days old. We will then use an artificial insemination
apparatus to inseminate each worker with 2-3 μl of semen (it will be necessary to modify the ‘queen
holder’ so that it will restrain the smaller worker). The fathering drones will be retained for
After eggs appear we shall sacrifice the marked workers and determine
microscopically if semen has entered their spermatheca [35]. We will then genotype the worker and
a sample of eggs to determine if they were produced thelytokously or are biparental. If genotyping
the eggs reveals that they are produced thelytokously we will examine them cytologically (see
above) to determine if sperm cells entered the eggs and if so what their behaviour is. We will also
attempt direct fertilization of very young eggs. Fertilization of eggs is possible if they are exposed
in vitro to semen within 30 min of being laid [36]. Thus if insemination fails we should still be able
to observe what happens to sperm cells in an egg which was laid by a worker that is th/th. Will a
sperm cell take precedence from one of the central pronuclei and form a zygote, or will central
fusion of maternal pronuclei occur?
How can a homozygous individual be female? In honey bees an individual must be heterozygous
at the sex locus in order to be female – yet we have multiple instances of females homozygous at all
loci examined including a locus within the csd region. How? There are several possibilities
including a duplication such that there are two different copies of csd within a single genome or a
modification of the upstream gene that interacts with csd so that the female splice variants of double
sex are always produced. Using primers specific to the csd [15] we will amplify DNA from the
homozygous females. The objective then is to show beyond reasonable doubt whether the csd is
monomorphic or not. PCR products will be cloned into a microbial vector and multiple clones
sequenced at a commercial facility. Sequences will be aligned and compared with each other and to
reference sequences to determine if the homozygous individuals are in fact polymorphic at the csd.
A potential pitfall with this approach is that the PCR or cloning steps will asymmetrically amplify
one allele over another so that one allele is missed. One solution to this problem is digestion of PCR
products with restriction enzymes of short recognition sequence. If there is only one allele, the
combined lengths of the bands that show after digestion will equal the length of the undigested
product. If there are two alleles, the combined length will exceed the length of the undigested
product. If we can convincingly show that the csd is indeed monomorphic in these homozygous
females we shall assume that a gene downstream of csd has been modified to always produce
females. This could be confirmed by reverse transcription of double sex RNA to determine if the
female or male-producing splice variants are present [13].
Breeding queens from thelytokous workers. We know that workers can be the thelytokous
mothers of queens [37]. We will raise queens from workers and examine their progeny genetically
to determine if these queens produce female offspring sexually or asexually.
• Fundamental knowledge Genetics is an enabling science. Just as ‘nothing in biology makes
sense except in the light of evolution’, so too very little in evolutionary biology makes sense
without genetics. The thelytokous honey bees of South Africa provide a magnificent opportunity
to address fundamental questions in evolution and genetics: Why is sex important? How are
asexual lineages maintained? What are the alternative reproductive strategies available to
queens and workers? How did haplodiploidy evolve? What stops asexual lineages from replacing
sexual ones? The project will provide insights into a new form of parthenogenesis that results in
homozygosity at all loci, and new insights into sex determination in bees – how can individuals
that are homozygous at the sex locus also be female?
• International collaborations This project will feature South African-Australian collaborations
and will act to promote and strengthen research ties between Australia and South Africa. Our
project will attract international interest, drawing talented students and postdoctoral fellows from
overseas (we currently have interest from French, British and Indian students for thesis work on
this project).
• Building on world-class research capacities Our lab is one of the largest honeybee research
groups in the world. This project will provide us the means to pursue a new direction into honey
bee cytogenetics. In Australia there is a lack of expertise in insect cytogenetics. Our project will
provide an ideal environment for training cytogeneticists, molecular ecologists, entomologists,
apiculturalists and population geneticists, producing a new generation of experimentally and
theoretically sophisticated biologists, capable of performing high-quality scientific research that
is competitive internationally. Our graduates will have the breadth of entomological,
evolutionary and molecular training to play leadership roles in agriculture and fundamental
biology. Australia needs people with such training and knowledge to support agricultural
industries, to manage our natural environment, and to inspire the next generation of Australian
• Leadership This project will ensure our lab’s place at the forefront of international honey bee
research. The project will ensure access by Australian researchers at all levels to experimental
systems that will lead to conceptually innovative science.
• Protecting the Australian honey industry In South Africa, intra-specific parasitism by offspring
of a single thelytokous worker [9] led to the loss of 20-50% of commercial colonies within two
years [27]. Such a disaster could happen in Australia if A. m. capensis were inadvertently
introduced, or if an equivalent mutation occurred naturally here. Our project will generate an
understanding of the genetic mechanisms that led to the large-scale parasitism event in South
Africa. We therefore anticipate that we will determine the best strategies for controlling an
outbreak of parasitic workers. Thus this project falls within the priority area of ‘Safeguarding
Australia’ and priority goal ‘Protecting Australia from invasive diseases and pests’.
The applicant has a strong record of publication in top scientific journals including Nature, Science
and PLoS Biology and reporting results at pre-eminent scientific congresses such as the
international meetings of the IUSSI and the International Congresses of Entomology and Genetics.
This project will allow our laboratory to continue generate exciting results that we will submit to
the best journals. Furthermore, we will maintain our active links with the honey industry, attending
their conferences and writing for their industry journals. We regularly give talks to a general public
and have extensive experience with writing articles on scientific issues for the lay reader.
Oldroyd will lead the project and will take responsibility development of FISH, most fieldwork and
artificial inseminations, and development of new theory.
We will involve the following collaborators whose contributions (time, expertise and logistical
support) will be funded by their respective agencies and will greatly enhance the value of this
project. All participants will be intimately involved in the planning and conduct of these
Dr. Victor Rambau (Lecturer, University of Stellenbosch) is part of the strong Evolutionary
Genomics group at the University of Stellenbosch. He has expertise in FISH and other cytogenetic
techniques relevant to this project. He will collaborate by providing access to his fluorescent
microscopy facilities, and his expertise in the study of chromosomes.
Mr. M.H. Allsopp (Research Scientist, Agricultural Research Council, Stellenbosch, South
Africa): Allsopp will provide facilities for the observation hives and access to his Cape colonies for
survey work. Mr. Allsopp is arguably the world authority on Cape bee biology, and has over 10
years experience working with them. The Stellenbosch location of his lab minimizes problems that
can arise further north in South Africa, where the Cape bee hybridises with other subspecies.
Dr. T.C. Wossler (Lecturer, Department of Zoology and Botany, University of Stellenbosch, South
Africa) will host the Australian students and provide expertise in the biology of Cape bees and
logistical support.
A/Prof M. Beekman (QEII Fellow, University of Sydney) will provide expertise in Cape bee
biology and will collaborate in all aspects.
E8 References
Maynard-Smith, J. (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press
Otto, S.P. and Lenormand, T. (2002) Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 252-261
Pearcy, M. et al. (2004) Science 306, 1780-1783
Oldroyd, B.P. and Fewell, J.H. (2007) Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 408-413
Fournier, D. et al. (2005) Nature 435, 1230-1234
Jordan, L.A. et al. (2008) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275, 345-351
Ratnieks, F.L.W. et al. (2006) Ann. Rev. Ent. 51, 581-608
Verma, L.R. and Ruttner, F. (1983) Apidologie 14, 41-37
Baudry, E. et al. (2004) Genetics 167, 243-252
Beye, M. et al. (2003) Cell 114, 419-429
Woyke, J. (1963) J. Apic. Res. 2, 73-75
Hasselmann, M. and Beye, M. (2004) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4888-4893
Cho, S. et al. (2007) Genetics 177, 1733-1741
Pearcy, M. et al. (2006) Heredity 96, 377-382
Hasselmann, M. and Beye, M. (2006) Genetics 174, 1469-1480
Beekman, M. et al. (2008) Heredity 100, 13-18
Oldroyd, B.P. (2002) Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 249-251
O'Neill, S.L. et al. (1997) Influential passengers: Inherited microorganisms and arthropod
reproduction. Oxford University Press
Hoy, M.A. et al. (2003) Apidologie 34, 53-60
Lattorff, H.M.G. et al. (2007) Biol. Let. 3, 292-295
Maynard Smith, J. (1971) J. Theor. Biol. 30, 319-355
Keller, L. (2007) Am. Nat. 169, 1-8
Anon. (2007) Nature 450, 764
Sumner, S. and Keller, L. (2008) Curr. Biol. In press
Vavre, F. et al. (2004) Heredity 93, 592-596
Beekman, M. et al. (2000) Nature 404, 723
Allsopp, M.H. (1992) S. Afric. Bee J. 64, 52-55
Yu, R. and Omholt, S.W. (1999) J. Ins. Physiol. 45, 763-767
Omholt, S.W. et al. (1995) Apidologie 26, 297-204
de Menten, L. et al. (2003) Mol. Ecol. 12, 1637-1648
Oldroyd, B.P. et al. (2008) Submitted to Genetics
Gregory, P.G. and Rinderer, T.E. (2004) Ent. Experiment. Applic. 111, 173-177
Duchateau, M.J. and van Leeuwen, P. (1990) Ins. Soc. 37, 232-235
Solignac, M. et al. (2007) Genome Biology 8
Dade, H.A. (1977) Anatomy and dissection of the honeybee. International Bee Research
Sasaki, K. and Obaru, Y. (2002) Ins. Soc. 49, 234-240
Moritz, R.F.A. et al. (1996) Nature 384, 31
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF