Test Report 9200132B..

Test Report 9200132B..
e
Non-Automatic weighing instruments
Part 2: Pattern evaluation report
Instruments de pesage à fonctionnement non automatique
Partie 2: Rapport d'essai de modéle
Project number
Test report number
Issued hy
Test adress
Test specifications
Applicant
Manufacturer
Date of application
End of application
Signature
Date
OIML R 76-2 Edition 1893 (E)
9200132
92001325
NMi Certin B.V.
Hugo de Grootplein 1
NL-3314 EG DORDRECHT
NM! Certin B.V.
Department Product Certification
Hugo de Grootpiein 1
NL-3314 EG DORDRECHT
OIML R76 - 1 (Edition 1992}, including amendment 1 (1954)
WELMEC 2.1 guide for testing indicators {issue 4 - August 2001)
Grupo Epelsa, S.L.
Ctra. Sta. Cruz de Calafell, 35 кт, 9,400
08830 Sant Bol de Llobregat
Barcelona
Spain
Grupo Epelsa, S.L.
2009-04-23 A ee
2 009- 1 0-2 8 Da
2009-12-10 / Ne | ой W N.
В TESTING
AVAL CZ
Reproduction of the complete document is allowed. Parts of the document may only be reproduced after written permission.
MEAS R76 / V050719A R76-2 page 1 of 25
Report N°: 82001328
R 76-2 page 2 of 25
Contents
GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PATTERN eee
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE TEST EQUIPMENT USED FOR PATTERN EVALUATION ны.
SUMMARY OF PATTERN EVALUATION eee eee nn eee er ee
1. WEIGHING PERFORMANCE tee er eters eee eee ees
2 TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON NO-LOAD INDICATION ieee eee
BE CENT RIC TY ooo O OOO E
3.1 Eccentricity USING Weighs Le
3.2 Eccentricity using a roling 080 ................. 2er rr ere Ir erecereecacenen eee ae
á4 DISCRIMINATION AND SENSITIVITY LN... eee RR Ne
4.1 Discrimination L............L Le aca cree ae ee arr ner nee naar ere eee sen ere nee eee ae Ce ee ee eee ee ae ae ae
4.2 SEnsitiviiy ONE
REPEAT ABILITY ote ee tee O O OO O TT
6 TIME-DEPENDENCE iii reer irriN ene erre rrrrenenrcerrnnrtrr ren t tener ees neers
6.1 LOTO VEUT OS
6.2 LOT =1 = «RESTE TETE EEE TEE
7 STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIUM ieee eee eee ES
E CO E O AE
9 TARE (WEIGHING TEST) oii trite rer esse pee eee areas eee CO CE OO ee pra
10 WARM-UP TIME i eee eee eee ee ee eee eee ee eee ee a ee ee ES
11 VARIATIONS OF VOLTAGE eee erre eee ee ee re
12 ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCES tr eee te eerie ieee
12.1 Short time power reductions iii ie terre eee eee eee eee ass Crea re aa ae
12.2 Electrical bursts i eee eee eee eee eee eens
12.3 Electrostatic discharges i ieee a sara eee eee eee eee
12.4 Immunity to radiated electromagnetic fields ................. 2er RR e RRA
13 DAMP HEAT, STEADY ST ATE ieee tee eee eee eee eee eee eee cera Re neto ter ana a a
dé SPAN STABILITŸ Lo ces tree earr arr aaa nana ae ane ee ae eee eee ee ee eee eee eee AE EE
15 EN DU RANG EE O
16 EXAMINATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INSTRUMENT eee eee san nee
17 CHE CK LIE eee eee eee eee A ee eee eee meee T0
17.1 All types of weighing instruments except non-self-indicating instruments ee
17.2 Instruments for direct sales to the public and price computing and labelling instruments ..............
17.3 Electronic weighing Instruments eee nana
15
16
18
25
Report N°: 92001328
В 76-2 page 3 of 25
GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PATTERN
9200132
ML-100
Grupo Epelsa, S.L.
Grupo Epeisa, S.L.
indicator
Application N°:
Pattern designation:
Manufaciurer:
Applicant:
Instrument category:
indication of the instrument:
Self-indicating
EN Semi-self--indicating
EN Non-self-indicating
Accuracy class:
| Accuracy class (1)
| | Accuracy class (iD)
Accuracy class (11)
E Accuracy class (Iii
instrument type:
EN Complete instrument
Module ()
min= [
e= py Mas [0 d= Cle n=
ei = HV] Maxi = dl = [e] nt =
g2 = [Vi Max2 = d2 = [e] п2 =
ed = [HV] Max3 = d3 = le] ПЗ =
те + DL % ofMax Ts - LL Jwofwax
Un = 220 \ { = 50/60 Hz
Umin = 220 \ Ubattery = - \
max = 230 \
Zero-setting device Tare device:
x i Tare balancing [ | Combined zeroftare device
Tare weighing
x | Preset tare device
Subtractive tare
ne Non-automatic
Semi-automatic
| Automatic zero-setting
EN initial zero-setting
Zero-tracking
Additive tare
Initial zero setting range = =< 20 Yo
Temperature range = -10/+40 1°C
Printer:
Build-in
ии Connected
EN Not present but connectable
| No connection for printer
Instrument submitted: LoadCelil:
identification N°: 7788880 Manufacturer: -
Connected equipment: - Type: -
Capacity: -
Number: -
interfaces: R5232; UTP Classification
(number, nature) symbol: -
Remarks: see following page
Date of report: 2009-12-10 Evaluation period: 2009-06-08 /
Observer: MZ, MM
() The test equipment (simulator or a pari of a complete instrument) connected to the module shall be defined in the
test form(s) used.
2009-12-04
Report N°: 9200132B
R 76-2 page 4 of 25
GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PATTERN (continued)
Use this space to indicate additional remarks and/or information: connections equipment, interfaces and load cells,
choice of the manufacturer regarding protection against disturbances {5.1.1.2 or 5.1.1.0), etc.
Software version number: See below (*)
Software version number displayed: On start-up
Set-up of the indicator and the simulator:
OV
0.7500 [mV
1064
interval 1
87
Specification and set-up of the load cell used for EMC testing:
of
( 181100
1): 0975887 Cnt: 00038 (changes when calibrated}
01005 3650 14 Oct08
P-SPBO9.ID00K-01-1
The examination of the ML-100 indicator makes use of two test reports; this one (9200132A) and (6200132B)
Test report 9200132A contains the so-called smailer weighing tests and the EMC tests.
Test report 9200132B contains the span stability test within which are contained the Temperature, Damp Heat and Warm-up test.
The reason for this was that a new calibration was performed prior to the span stability test period.
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 5 of 25
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE TEST EQUIPMENT USED FOR PATTERN EVALUATION
Application N°: 9200132
Pattern designation. ML-100
uncton
emp. 20 - +80 °С
- RH
pad
1 / DMM166 - 1 kV
05237 - 2
274 - 15 kV
- Vim
Marconi 32 10 kHz - 5.4 GHz
BTA 0122-1 10 kHz - 220 1 vw
MT215 MHz - 1 150W
102 1-2 Vv
91 25 MHz - 4 GHz
í mv
Traceability The measurements have been executed using standards for which the traceability to primary standards,
(international standards and/or properties of pure substances has heen demonstrated.
Report N°: 82001328
R 76-2 page 6 of 25
Summary of pattern evaluation
Application N7: 8200132
Pattern designation: ME-100
T
Weighing performance
Determination intrinsic error
#1
of
#3
error 44
the error #5
Discrimination
Non-self
Electrical bursts
Electrostatic discharges
immunity to radiated at 6 Vim
Damp heat, steady state test {at
Test at
Final test {at
Endurance initial test
Failed
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 7 of 25
1 WEIGHING PERFORMANCE (A.4.4)(A.5.3.1)
(Calculation of the error of the simulator used during temperature and damp heat, steady state tests)
Application N°: 9200132 At start Atmax Atend
Pattern designation: ML.100 Temp. $ rrp
Date: 2009-08-31 Rein.
Observer: MZ Time:
Verification Bar. pres:
scale interval e: 1.25 pV Rho air:
Resolution during test (Only class (1))
(smaller than el: 0.0375 pV
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
| Non-existent
Not in operation
EN Out of working range
mu in operation
Set-up value "Real" сай
indication | indication i
dr
212784 21
227994
24 24
16
Remarks: The calculated indication of the indicator is based on the maximum number of divisions in
high resolution mode. The measured indications are the indications at the initial
measurement (refer to test 1), corrected for the zero deviation. The real load is the
calculated value of the input voltage.
Formula used:
Real load = Set-up value * Measured indication
Calculated indication
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page § of 25
1 WEIGHING PERFORMANCE {A.4.4}{A.5.3.1}
(Determination of the initial intrinsic error)
Application N”: 9200132 At start At max end
Pattern designation: ML-100 Temp. °C
Date: 2009-08-31 Rei. A: 52. Ye
Observer: MZ Time: 16: : :
Verification Bar. pres: 1 hPa
scale interval e. 1.25 UV Rho air: 1.1 kg/m*3
Resolution during test (Only class (MH)
(smaller than e): 0.0375 НУ
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is: initial zero-setting > 20% of Max: (see К 76-1, А.4.4.2}
E Non-existent EN Yes
Not in operation No
ne Out of working range
| in operation
Е = (1-ю) - |
Ec = E - Eo with Eo = error calculated at or near zero (7)
Zero indication (fo): | 212784 {cts}
Load L indication |
L
y
212784 0.25 ()
227 25
1
273628
Passed |] Failed
Remarks:
Report N°: 92001325
В 76-2 page 9 of 25
1 WEIGHING PERFORMANCE (A.4.4){(A.5.3.1)
(Calcutation of the error 1)
Application N°:
Pattern designation:
Date:
Observer:
Verification
scale interval e:
Resolution during test
(smaller than e):
9200132
ML-100
2009-08-31
MZ
1.25 pV
0.0375 uv
At
Temp. 20.
Rel. Ah:
Time: 16:
Bar. pres: 101
Rho air: 1.1
(Only class (1)}
Yo
hia
kg/m*3
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is: Initial zero-setting > 20% of Max: (see R 75-1, A.4.4.2)
Non-existent EN Yes
Not in operation No
и Out of working range
in operation
Е = ({1-lo)-L
Ec = E - Eo with Eo = error calculated at or near zero (”)
Zero indication (io): |
212816 [cts]
Moment
Time | Zero indication
[cts]
dL
fe]
Before preloading {at start)
After recovery (at end)
16:41 212816
Load |. Load L'
L Lf
my my
0. 0.
0.3 0.1
Passed |__| Failed
Remarks:
indication i
(zero indication at start of test at reference temperature)
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 10 of 25
1 WEIGHING PERFORMANCE (A.4.4)(A.5.3.1}
{Calculation of the error 2)
Application N°: 9200132
Pattern designation: ML-100
Date: 2009-09-01
Observer: MZ
Verification
scale interval e: 1.25 uv
Resolution during test
(smaller than e): 0.0375 pv
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
| Non-existent
Not in operation
Out of working range
| in operation
E = (1-10) -L
At At At
Temp. 5 40.5 {°C
Rel. h.: 33.3 Ya
Time: 09:19 | 09:23 | 09:23
Bar, pres: 1 1 hPa
Rho air: 1.1082 kg/m*3
(Oniv class (5)
Initial zero-setting > 20% of Max: (see R 75-1, A.4.4.2)
o Yes
No
Ес = E - Eo with Eo = error calculated at or near zero (*)
Zero indication (10): | 212816 | {cts} (zero indication at start of test at reference temperature)
Moment Time | Zerc indication di.
[cts] {el
Before preloading (at start} 09:18 212802
After recovery (at end) 09:24 212800
Load L Load L'
L |
my my
‚1000
4000
‚5000
0.
0.7000
9.7000
Passed © Failed
Remarks:
Indication |
273536
318266
Report N°: 92001325
R 76-2 page 11 of 25
4 WEIGHING PERFORMANCE (A.4.4)(A.5.3.1)
{Calculation of the error 3)
Application N°: 9200132 Af
Pattern designation: ML-100 Temp. -10.8 °С
Date: 2009-09-02 Rel. A: 87. Ya
Observer: MZ Time: :33 | 09:35 | 09:
Verification Bar. pres: 101 1014 ¡hPa
scale interval e: 1.25 НУ Rho air: 4, ka/m*3
Resolution during test (Only class (i)
(smaller than e): 0.0375 pv
Automatic zero-sefting and zero-tracking device is: initial zero-setting > 20% of Max: (see R 76-1, À 4.4.2)
EN Non-existent EN Yes
Not in operation No
UN Qut of working range
IN in operation
Е = (1-10) - =
Ес = £ - Fo with Fo = error calculated at or near zero (”)
Zero indication (lo): Ш 212818! [cts] (zero indication at start of test at reference temperature)
Moment Time | Zero indication aL
[cts] Le]
Before preloading (at start) 09.32 212814
After recovery (at end) 09:36 212812
Load L Load L' Indication |
L 1 ;
my
Passed | |] Failed
Remarks:
Report N°: 8200132B
R 76-2 page 12 of 25
1 WEIGHING PERFORMANCE {A.4.4}{A.5.3.1)
{Calculation of the error 4)
Application N°: 9200132 At start At max At
Pattern designation: ME-100 Temp. 4.3 441°C
Date: 2009-09-03 Rel. h.: 47.2 %
Observer: MZ Time: 09:51 { 09:55 | 09:55
Verification Bar. pres: 997 997 ¡hPa
scale interval e: 1.25 uv Rho air; 1 kg/m*3
Resolution during test (Only class (Mi
(smaller than e): 0.0375 uv
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is: initial zero-setting > 20% of Max: (see В 76-1, А.4.4.2}
E Non-existent | Yes
Not in operation No
| Out of working range
In operation
E=(I-l0)-L
Ec = E - Eo with £o = error caiculated at or near zero (*)
Zero indication (lo): 212816 icts] (zero indication at start of test at reference temperature}
Moment Time | Zero indication di
[cts] ie
Before preloading (at start} 09:50 212856
After recovery (at end) 09:56 212867
Load | Load L' indication |
L |'
mv
212856
273700
23891
304124
31
Passed [| Failed
Remarks:
Report N°. 82001328
R 76-2 page 13 of 25
1 WEIGHING PERFORMANCE (A.4.4}(A.5.3.1)
{Calculation of the error 5)
Application N°: 9200132
Pattern designation: ML-100
Date: 2009-09-03
Observer: MZ
Verification
scale interval e: 1.25 pv
Resolution during test
(smaller than e): 0.0375 pv
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device
|| Non-existent
Not in operation
E Out of working range
o] in operation
E={l-lo)-L
IS!
Ес = Е - Eo with Eo = error calculated at or near zero (7)
Zero indication (10): Е 212816 | [cts]
Moment Time | Zero indication gl.
fois] le]
Before preloading (at start) 16:19 212910
After recovery (at end)
Load Lb Load L'
E |
mv
4000
7000
Passed || Failed
Remarks:
Indication |
Temp.
Rei. A:
Time: 16:
Bar. pres:
Rho air: 1.1
(Only class (1)
(zero indication at start of test ai reference temperature)
°С
%
16:24 1 16:24
1001 hPa
kg/m*3
Initial zero-setting > 20% of Max: (see R 76-1, À 4.4.2)
Report N°: 92001328
R 78-2 page 14 of 25
2 TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON NO-LOAD INDICATION ( A.5.3.2)
Application N°: 9200132
Pattern designation: ML-100
Observer: MZ
Verification
scale interval e: 1.25 yv
Resolution during test
(smaller than e): 0.0375 pv
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
| Non-existent
Not in operation
| Qut of working range
E in operation
P=(1-10)
Zero indication (lo): | 212816 | [cts]
(zero indication at start of test at reference temperature)
Report Date Time ; Temp Zero al P dP dr Zero-change
page indication (1) in [e]
e ue [cts] 1e] je} fe] ue per5 CG
9 2009-08-31 16:41 20.4 212816 0.001 -0.39 20.1 -0.10
2009-09-01 | 09:18 40.5 212802 -0.39
10
2009-09-01 | 09:24 40.5 212800 -0.45 0.391 -51.3 -0.04
2009-09-02 | 09:32 -10.8 212814 -0.06
11
2009-09-02 | 09:36 -10.8 212812 -0,11 1.24 15.1 0.41
2009-09-03 | 09:50 4.3 212856 1.13
12
2009-09-63 | 09:56 4.4 212862 1.30 1.35 18.6 0.43
13 2009-09-03 | 16:19 20.0 212810 2.65
(*) Give the report page of the relevant weighing test where weighing tests and temperature effect on no-icad
indication test are conducted together (see R 76-1, figure 10).
dP = difference of P for two consecutive tests al different temperatures
dT = difference of Temp for two consecutive tests at different temperatures
Check if the zero change per 5 °C is smaller than e*pi (class (11), (111), CH)
Check if the zero change per 1 °C is smaller than e*pi {class (1)
Passed [| Failed
Remarks:
Верой №: 92001328
В 76-2 page 15 of 25
10 WARM-UP TIME (A.5.2)
Application N°:
Pattern designation:
Date:
Observer.
Verification
scale interval e:
Resolution during test
(smaller than e):
9200132
ME-100
2009-09-09
MZ
1.25 uv
0.0375 uv
Duration of disconnection before test:
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
О Non-existent
Not in operation
Out of working range
in operation
Zero indication (lo) a
E=(1-10)-L'
212842 | [cts]
More than 8 hours.
£0 = error calculated prior to each measurement at or near zero (unloaded)
El = error calculated at load (loaded)
Temp.:
Rel. n.:
Time:
Bar. pres:
Rho air:
(Only class (1)
Atstart_ Atmax Atend
time {Load Corrected Indication dl. E El- Fo mpe
*) L Load L' |
ImV/V] [MVA] [cts] [e] [e] [e] le]
Unloaded {} min 0.0000 9.0000 212847 0.00
Loaded 09:55 0.7000 0.7000 319310 0.17 0.17 | 0.75 |
Unloaded 5 min 0.0000 0.0000 212904 1.75
Loaded 10:00 0.7000 0.7000 319374 1.63 0.11] 0.75 |
Unioaded 15 min 0.0000 0.0000 212928 2.42
Loaded 10:10 0.7000 0.7000 3193986 2.25 0.17 | 0.75 |
Unloaded 30 min 0.0000 0.0000 212928 2.42
Loaded 10:25 0.7000 0.7000 319396 2.25 -0.17 | 0.75 | on,
(*y Counted from the moment an indication has first appeared. Check that { Ef - Eo | <= mpe
Passed || Failed
Remarks:
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 16 of 25
13 DAMP HEAT, STEADY STATE (B.2.2)
a) Initial test (at reference temperature)
Application N°: 8200132 At start Atmax Atend
Pattern designation: МЕ-100 Temp.: 20.2 21°C
Date: 2009-09-04 Rel. A: 53.2 %
Observer: MZ Time: 08:58
Verification Bar. pres: 1 hPa
scale interval e: 1.25 Rho air: 1.1 kg/m*3
Resolution during test {Only class (1)
(smaller than €): 0.0375 pv
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
nN Non-existent
Not in operation
EN Out of working range
| in operation
E={-lo)-L
Ec = E - Eo with Eo = error calculated at or near zero {7
Zero indication (lo): o 212896 | [cts] (Zero indication at start of initial test)
Load L Load L' indication !
E В
my
212896 0.25 1("}
0.1 1
243312 0.50
2 0.50
0.75
7
7
Passed | ]Failed
Remarks:
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 17 of 25
13 DAMP HEAT, STEADY STATE (B.2.2)
b) Test at high temperature and 85% relative humidity
Application N°: 9200132 At
Pattern designation: ML-100 Temp 40 °С
Date: 2009-09-07 Rel. A: 86.3 %
Observer: MZ Time:
Verification Bar. pres: 1021 hPa
scale interval e: 1.25 pV Rho air: 1.1 kg/m*3
Resolution during test {Only class (1})
(smaller than e): 0.0375 pv
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
EN Non-existent
Not in operation
E Qut of working range
| in operation
E=(I-I0)-L
Ес = Е - Eo with Eo = error calculated at or near zero (*)
Zero indication {lo}: | 212596 | [ets] (Zero indication at start of initial test)
Load L Load: indication | dl. mpe
L LS
my mv
1 0.25 (7)
1000 228148 . 25
0 2 0
‚3000 . 50
0.4000 0.
‚5000 0.7
0
O. 15
Passed Po] Failed
Remarks:
Report N°. 92001328
R 76-2 page 18 of 25
13 DAMP MEAT, STEADY STATE (B.2.2)
c) Final test (at reference temperature)
Application N°: 9200132
Pattern designation: ML-100 Temp. °C
Date: 2009-09-07 Ret. h.: %
Observer: MZ Time:
Verification Bar. pres: hPa
scale interval e: 1.25 uv Rho air: Kg/m*3
Resolution during tesí (Only class (1)
{smaller than e): 0.0375 pv
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
Non-existent
Not in operation
Out of working range
in operation
E=f(t-i0)-L
Ec = E - Eo with Eo = error calculated at or near zero (*)
Zero indication (io): | 212896 {cis} (Zero indication at start of initial test)
Load L Indication | gl
|
my
2 . 0.25 1(”)
0.1 228148 25
0.50
0.
{
0.75
0.7
Passed Do Failed
Remarks:
Report N°: 9200132B
R 78-2 page 19 of 25
14 SPAN STABILITY (B.4)
Application N°: 9200132
Pattern designation: ML- 100
Verification
scale interval e: 1.25 НУ
Resolution during test
(smaller than e): 0.0375 uy
Automatic zero-setting and zero-tracking device is:
Non-existent
El Not in operation
E Out of working range
0.0000 | MV]
0.7000 | [mV]
Zero load (Lo)
Testioad (L)
Measurement N° 1: Initial measurement
Date: 2009-08-31
Observer: MZ Temp.
Location: Lab32 Rei h.
Time:
Bar. pres:
Rho air:
initial zero indication (0,0) 212800 [cts]
{zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Eo = (io - 10,0} - 6
ЕЕ= (Н- 10,0) - |
Indication dLo Eo Corrected Indication db El El - Eo
of zero (lo) testload L' of load (if)
[cts] le] le] [mv] [cts] [e] [e] le]
1 212800 0.00 0.7000 319268 0.171 -0.17
2 212800 0.00 0.7000 319270 -0.11 -0.11
3 212800 0.00 0.7000 319268 0.17 -0,17
4 212800 0.00 0.7000 318270 -0.11 0.11
5 212800 0.00 0.7000 319268 0.171 0.47
[e]
le]
[e]
[-}
Average error = average (El - Eo)
(El - Eo) max - (El - Eo) min
Verification scale interval (€) at maximum =
Number of loadings in subsequent measurements
il
Alb start At max Af end
if (El - Eo) max - (El - Eo) min] <= 0.1 e, the loading and reading will be sufficient for each of the subsequent
measurements: if not, five loadings and readings shall be performed at each measurement,
Remarks:
Y
hPa
kg/m"3
Report N°: 92001328
В 76-2 page 20 of 25
14 SPAN STABILITY (Cont)
Subsequent measurements
For each of the subsequent measurements (at least 7), indicate on the line "conditions of the measurement”, as
appropriate, if the measurement has been performed:
- after the temperature test, the EUT having been stabilized for at least 16 В;
~- after the humidity test, the EUT having been stabilized for at least 16h;
- after the FUT has been disconnected from the mains for at least 8 h and then stabilized for at least § h;
- after any change in the test location;
- under any other specific condition.
Measurement N° 2:
Date: 2009-09-04 At max Atend
Observer: MZ Temp.: °C
Location: Lab 32 Ret, H: 53.2 бо
Time: 08:
Bar. pres: 1004 hPa
Initial zero indication {10,0} | 212800 | [cts] Rho air: 1.1 kg/m3
(zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Conditions of the measurement: After temperature test, EUT has stabilized for more than 16 hours.
Eo = (lo - 10,0}
Ei=(l-lo,0)-L
indication Corrected indication
of zero (10) testioad L' of load (IN
my
212894 31
Average error = average of "El - Eo” = [e]
Remarks:
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 21 ot 25
14 SPAN STABILITY (Cont.)
Measurement N° 3:
Date: 2009-09-08
Observer: MZ Temp.: °С
Location: Lab 32 Rei. h.: %
Time:
Bar. pres: hPa
initial zero indication (10,0) | 212800 | [cts] Rho air: kg/m*3
(zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Conditions of the measurement: After damp heat test, EUT has stabilized for more than 16 hours.
Eo = {lo - 10,0)
Et = (il. loo) -E
indication dLo Eo Corrected indication
of zero (lo) testivad L' of load {I
21 . 31 A
Average error = average of "El - Eo" = [e]
Remarks:
Measurement N° 4:
Date: 2009-08-09 At At max At
Observer. MZ Temp.: °C
Location: Lab 32 Rel A: %
Time:
Bar. pres: hPa
initial zero indication (10,0) | 212800 | [cts] Rho air: kg/m*3
(zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Conditions of the measurement: After power cycie, EUT has stabilized for more than 5 hours. AT
Eo = {lo - loo)
Ét = ét - loo) - L'
Indication Corrected Indication
of zero (10) testioad L' of load (ii)
my.
21 : 0.7000
Average error = average of "El - Eo" = [e]
Remarks:
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 22 of 25
14 SPAN STABILITY (Cont.)
Meastirement N° 5:
Date: 2009-09-10
Observer: MZ
Location: Lab 32
Initial zero indication (10,0) | 212800 [cts]
(zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Conditions of the measurement: No change.
£0 = {lo - 10,0}
El = (li - 0,0) -
Indication Corrected
of zero (lo) testivad L'
V
212970
Temp.:
Не! В;
Time:
Bar. pres:
Rho air:
Indication
of load (If)
31
Average error = average of "Él - Eo" = le!
Remarks:
Measurement N° 6:
Date: 2009-08-11
Observer: MZ Temp.:
Location: Lab 32 Rel. A.:
Time:
Bar, pres:
Initial zero indication (lo,o) | 212800 | icts] Rho air;
{zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Conditions of the measurement: After power cycle, EUT has stabilized for more than 5 hours.
Eo = (lo - 10,0)
ЕЕ= (НИ - Ю,0) -
indication Corrected
of zero (10) testioad L'
my
indication
of load (IN
3
Average error = average of "El - Eo” = fe]
Remarks:
°С
EL
hPa
Kg/m*3
start At
21.2 °С
Î %
14:58
1 hPa
1.2186 kg/m"3
Report N°: 92001326
R 76-2 page 23 of 25
14 SPAN STABILITY (Cont)
Measurement N° 7:
Date: 2009-09-14
Observer: MZ
Location: Lab 32
Initial zero indication (10,0) т 242800 | [cts]
(zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Conditions of the measurement: No change.
Fo = (lo - 10,0)
El = {H-10,0}- L'
Indication Corrected Indication
of zero (lo) testioad L' of load (li)
my
21294 0.7 319412
1
2
3
4
5
Average error = average of "El - Eo" = te]
Remarks:
Measurement N° 6:
Date: 2009-09-15
Observer: MZ
Location: Lab 32
initial zero indication (lo,0) | 212800 | [cts]
(zero indication at start of initial measurement)
Conditions of the measurement: No change.
Ео = (0 - 10,0}
2Е= (Н- 10.0) - |
Indication Corrected Indication
of zero (to) testioad I ot load {IH}
31
4
5
Average error = average of "El - £0” = le]
Remarks:
Temp.:
Rel. h.:
Time:
Bar. pres:
Rho air:
Temp.:
Rel, A.:
Time:
Bar. pres:
Rho air:
°C
Ya
hPa
kg/m*3
°С
Yo
hPa
Kg/m"3
TT
Report N°: 92001328
R 76-2 page 24 of 25
14 SPAN STABILITY (Cont.)
Summary of the span stability test
Average Corrected
error average error
-0.15
-0.06
17
-0.2
-0.1
7 AA
-0
9
10
11
12
Maximum difference between corrected average errors
Maximum difference between successive tests
Maximum allowable variations:
1/2 mpe
1/2 e * pi
-0.02
-0.14
-0.02
0.
-0.02
Diff. between
successive tests
0.23
[e] (1)
0.11
el (2)
0.75
e]
0.50
le]
Check that (1) and (2) are not more than 1/2 mpe or 1/2 e * pi (whichever is greater)
Passed || Failed
1.5
0.5
-1.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Report N°: 82001328
R 76-2 page 25 of 25
16 EXAMINATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INSTRUMENT (B.4)
Use this page to indicate any description pertaining to the instrument, additional to that already contained in this report and in the
accompanying national pattern approval or OIML certificate. This may include a picture of the complete instrument. a description of its
main components, and any remark which could be useful for authorities responsible for the initial or subsequent verifications of
individual instruments build according to the pattern. it may also include references to the manufacturer description,
Measurement and calculation of the maximum cable length from the indicator to the junction box or load cells.
According to the WELMEC guide for testing indicators.
Measured errors of span at temperature test
Date: 2009-06-10 Temp EC
Observer: MZ PC [e]
40.5 -0.28
- 10.8 0.23
Measuremenis Span calculations Maximum cable
Re |Load [a] 11 ds 4S Reabie length
O
1 1
092 5212.
132.1387 7818.9
7283 75.0
73.4104 3.8
105.7110 À
0174 4734.8
Remarks:
Description:
The indicator is described in test certificate: TC6953
Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertisement