ORDINANCE Amendment to Appendix C, Chapter VI, of the Comprehensive Plan

ORDINANCE Amendment to Appendix C, Chapter VI, of the Comprehensive Plan

ORDINANCE NUMBER

C

'b -

\Q

AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX C- CHAPTER VI (CAPITAL FACILITIES)

OF THE MASON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

ORDINANCE

amending Ordinance 110-09 to further amend Appendix C

in the

Capital Facilities element (Chapter VI) of the Mason County Comprehensive

Plan

under the authority of RCW 36. 70A.130 and RCW 36. 70A. 70.

WHEREAS,

on December 8, 2009 the Board of County Commissioners adopted revisions to the Comprehensive Plan, including those contained within the

Capital Facilities element

,

in compliance with RCW 37. 70A.130; and

WHEREAS,

the Capital Facilities element as adopted did not

include

current

County budget

information

necessary to meet the guidelines set forth

RCW

37. 70A. 70

;

and

WHEREAS,

the Capital Facilities element as attached herewith includes Mason

County 2010 Budget information

in

Appendix C and is appropriate for adoption in accordance with RCW 37

.

70A.130.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED,

THE

Mason County Board of

Commissioners

hereby

approves and ADOPTS revisions to Chapter VI (Capital

Facilities element) of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan as described by

ATTACHMENT A.

DATED

this

l~

January

2010.

Board of Commissioners

Mason County, Washington

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MASON UNTY

,

WASHINGTON

ATTEST:

Tim Sheldon, Commissioner

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Chapter VI

CAPITAL FACILITIES

Capital Facilities

VI - 1 INTRODUCTION

Purpose

The Capital Facilities Chapter contains the capital facilities element, one of the six elements required for Mason County's Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA)

(36.70A.070 RCW). This element provides an inventory of existing conditions and publicly owned facilities by quantifying capital facilities currently provided by Mason County or by other jurisdictions operating in the County.

The chapter also contains goals and policies for the capital facilities operated by Mason County, except for transportation facilities, which are discussed in the Transportation Chapter.

The capacity of the County facilities and the level of service they provide is discussed and compared with the County's desired levels of service. The "level of service" is an objective measure of how well services are provided to the public. Deficiencies and improvement needs are identified, improvement costs are estimated, projects are scheduled for six and 20-year planning horizons, and a six-year finance plan and possible financing options are discussed.

Besides the City of Shelton, there are other public organizations and special districts that have capital facilities and taxing authority which exist in the county. These include the school districts, hospital districts, port districts, cemetery district Public Utility Districts, regional library system, and fire districts. These districts have their own governing body and capital facilities planning. The county coordinated the comprehensive plan with these bodies, through meetings, correspondence, and by providing draft of the comprehensive plan to these districts for comment. A list of these districts is provided as follows:

V/.1

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010)

Mason County Hospital District #1

Mason County Hospital District #2

Port of Allyn

Port of Dewatto

Port of Grapeview

Port of Hoodsport

Port of Shelton

Southside School District #42

Grapeview School District #54

Elma School District #68/137

Shelton School District #309

Mary M Knight School District #311

Pioneer School District #402

North Mason School District #403

Hood Canal School District #404

Fire Protection District #1

Fire Protection District #2

Fire Protection District #3

Fire Protection District #4

Fire Protection District #5

Fire Protection District #6

Fire Protection District #8

Fire Protection District #9

Fire Protection District #11

Fire Protection District #12

Fire Protection District #13

Fire Protection District #16

Fire Protection District #17

Fire Protection District #18

Cemetery District #1

Belfair Water District #1

Public Utility District #1

Public Utility District #3

Capital Facilities

Organization and Contents

The following section of this chapter, Vl-2, includes a list of goals and policies that provides the direction for future capital facility decisions for Mason County.

Subsequent sections, Vl-3 through 9, profile and analyze seven types of capital facilities in the

County, as follows:

• Water and Wastewater Utilities

• Solid Waste Utility

• Parks and Recreation Facilities

• County Administration Buildings

• Police and Criminal Justice Facilities

• Stormwater Management Facilities

• Public Works Facilities

Sections 3 through 9 each includes a brief description of the existing systems and public entities that provide the facilities. An assessment of future facility needs is also developed for each category of facility. The last section of this chapter, Vl-1 0, discusses financing for county owned and operated facilities for the six-year financial planning period 2010-2015.

01.04.10

V/.2

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Facility Needs

A number of methods can be used to determine Mason County's capital facility needs over the next six and 20-year GMA planning periods. As not all capital facilities require the same level of analysis to determine needed improvements, different analytical techniques can be employed to identify facility needs as long as they accomplish the goal of determining future need for the capital facilities.

While the state Growth Management Act requires that level of service (LOS) standards be established to identify transportation improvements, the need for other capital facilities can be assessed using either LOS or planning level assumptions (WAC 365-195-315).

The advantage of using LOS standards is the ability to quantify deficiencies and identify improvement needs. The LOS can also be used as a performance standard for concurrency by comparing the service level being provided by a capital facility against the quantitative LOS standard. The service is considered deficient if it does not meet the service level standard that the County has determined it wants to deliver to its residents and users. The LOS approach makes the most sense where there are easily quantifiable facilities or where the state has defined the standards, such as for sewer and water facilities.

The less rigorous planning assumptions approach also has advantages. The capital facilities planning assumptions are not quantitative measures of facility need. Instead, they identify facility improvements based upon the need to serve growth and development anticipated in the land use element. This approach works best where identification of quantitative measures would be difficult, where there are no statewide standards, or where the necessary information or data to apply quantitative measures would be difficult or too time-consuming to obtain.

Facilities such as parks and recreation and stormwater facilities might best be handled with this approach.

Financing

Facility needs are identified, and a six-year finance plan is developed, in section Vl-1 0 for the following County-owned-and-operated facilities.

Sewer

Water

Parks and recreation

Stornnwater

This section also includes the results of facility planning efforts completed by the County for

County administrative buildings, police and criminal justice facilities, and solid waste facilities.

Financing needs and options are included for these facilities as well. The section includes by reference the capital facilities plans for Grapeview, Hood Canal, North Mason, Pioneer, and

Shelton School Districts, to facilitate orderly growth and coordination in the provision of future capital facility needs.

01.04.10

V/.3

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August. 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

Concurrency Management

One of the Growth Management Act goals, referred to as "concurrency," is the provision of infrastructure facilities and services to serve projected growth at the time such growth occurs, or within a reasonable time afterwards. This starts with identifying specific facility needs using the strategies previously discussed. Another important aspect of concurrency is the ability to monitor the development of infrastructure improvements to assess whether they keep pace with approved development.

Concurrency management, as it is called, involves a set of land use and permit approval processes designed to ensure facilities and services keep pace with growth. In some cases, development codes could be enacted to require that specific LOS standards be promulgated through the development of identified improvements.

In other cases, restrictions to growth may be imposed until appropriate service standards for capital facilities are achieved. Land use applications for certain development proposals, in areas targeted for future growth, could have their approvals withheld pending concomitant development of appropriate urban service level facilities (e.g., sewer facilities). The municipality would be responsible for managing the concurrent development of these urban services. This can be accomplished by requiring that individual developers fund and implement needed improvements. Under this arrangement, the final tenant (e.g., homebuyer or building purchaser) would ultimately pay for the new facilities through a higher initial purchase price or through a periodic assessment.

Mason County's policies for concurrency management are contained in the following section,

Vl-2.

V/.4

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Vl.2 GOALS AND POLICIES

Introduction

Mason County's Capital Facilities Element is guided by goals and policies for the preferred service philosophy of the County. Goals and policies are required as part of the Capital

Facilities Element (RCW 36.70A) of the overall GMA Comprehensive Plan.

Development Process

Mason County evaluated it's existing facilities, it's future needs, it's costs, and the types and levels of services which it should require or provide in the county. The goals and policies listed herein are the result of this process. Policies listed under General Capital Facilities apply to all facilities addressed in the Capital Facilities Chapter. Facility-specific policies apply only to those facilities.

General Capital Facilities Policies

Land Use

Manage land use change and develop County facilities and services in a manner that directs and controls land use patterns and intensities.

CF-101

Establish urban services that shall require concurrency under the GMA.

CF-102

CF-103

CF-104

Ensure that future development bears a fair share of capital improvement costs necessitated by the development. The County shall reserve the right to collect mitigation impact fees from new development in order to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards.

Extend facilities and services in a manner consistent with the following Countywide policies previously adopted in 1992 (see Section 11-3).

County facilities shall be provided at urban or rural levels of service, as defined in the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan.

CF-105

CF-106

CF-107

CF-108

Develop capital facilities within established urban growth areas (UGAs) to conform to urban development standards.

Develop capital facilities within UGAs that are coordinated and phased through inter-jurisdictional agreements.

Coordinate and support other capital facility plans from special purpose districts, cities and towns, and other non-county facility providers that are consistent with this and other chapters of the Comprehensive Plan.

As the capital facilities plan is amended to reflect a changing financial situation or changing priorities, the land use chapter shall be reassessed on at least a

01.04.10

V/.5

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 -(updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities biennial basis to assure internal consistency of the land use chapter with the capital facilities chapter and its six-year financial plan.

Concurrency

Establish standards for levels of service for County public facilities, and ensure that necessary facilities are available at the time new development impacts existing systems.

CF-201

After adoption of this Comprehensive Plan and subsequent development regulations, level of service standards for each type of public facility shall apply to development permits issued by Mason County.

CF-202

CF-203

CF-204

Adopt level of service standards and concurrency requirements recommended in this plan for wastewater/sanitary systems, water supply systems, transportation facilities, and Storm water management facilities.

Public facilities needed to support development shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development or within a reasonable time thereafter. The county shall establish development regulations that will establish procedures and requirements to assure that the concurrency requirements are met.

New development, which has potential storm water impacts, shall provide evidence of adequate storm water management for the intended use of the site.

This policy shall apply in all areas of the county.

CF-205

CF-206

Building permits for any building necessitating domestic water systems shall provide evidence of an adequate water supply for the intended use of the building. Proposed subdivisions and short plats shall not be approved unless the county makes written findings that adequate provision for potable water are available for each development site. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county.

Building permits for any building necessitating wastewater treatment shall provide evidence of an adequate sanitary sewer system for the intended use of the building. This policy shall apply in all areas of the county.

Finance

Develop a six-year finance plan for capital facilities that meets the recommendations of the comprehensive plan, achieves the County's levels of service, and is financially attainable.

CF-301

Adopt a six-year capital improvement program that identifies projects, outlines a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all County capital facility projects.

CF-302

For all capital facility projects, evaluate alternatives to programs, purpose, and service as a method to reduce capital facilities and associated operating costs.

11412010

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010)

Capital Facilities

CF-303

Develop a public process that informs, notifies and allows participation on all capital facility proposals.

Essential Public Facilities

Facilitate the siting of essential public facilities! sponsored by public or private entities within unincorporated areas when appropriate.

CF-401

CF-402

Identify and allow for the siting of essential public facilities according to procedures established in this plan. Essential public facilities shall include group homes, state and local correctional facilities, substance abuse facilities, and mental health facilities. Work cooperatively with the City of Shelton and neighboring counties in the siting of public facilities of regional importance. Work cooperatively with state agencies to ensure that the essential public facilities meet existing state laws and regulations that have specific siting and permitting requirements.

Review proposed development regulations to ensure they allow for the siting of essential public facilities consistent with the goals, policies and procedures established in this plan.

Facility-Specific Policies

Wastewater/Sanitary Sewer

Assure that wastewater facilities necessary to carry out comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance these facilities in an economic, efficient, and equitable manner.

CF-501

Maintain a safe, efficient and cost-effective sewage collection and treatment system.

CF-502

All new development within designated urban growth areas and rural activity centers shall connect to existing sewer systems or provide a plan for connection to proposed public sewer systems when available. Public sewer systems are those owned and operated by any legally recognized municipal organization as a public utility.

CF-503

Allow existing single-family homes with septic systems to continue using septic systems, except in areas where public sewers are being developed that conform to existing standards. Replace deficient septic systems in a timely fashion.

1

RCW 36.70A.200(1) The comprehensive plan of each county and city that is planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall include a process for identifying and siting essential public facilities. Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, [marinas, railroad systems], state education facilities and state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020.

01.04.10

V/-7

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

CF-504

CF-505

CF-506

CF-507

Water Supply

Provide a septic system management and education program to protect groundwater quality and promote the proper care and use of septic systems.

Eliminate any unlicensed point or non-point pollution sources associated with sewage transport and disposal.

Monitor infiltration and inflow in major public systems through routine inspection.

Conduct improvements to limit and reduce current infiltration and inflow.

Encourage innovative approaches to onsite wastewater treatment.

Assure that water facilities necessary to carry out the comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance those facilities in an economic, efficient and equitable manner.

CF-601

Ensure that the supply and distribution of water in public systems is consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan.

CF-602

CF-603

Ensure that future water system expansions and service extensions are provided in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.

Where possible, those uses designated by the Land Use Element to require fire flow should be serviced by a Class A water system.

Create ways to use Class A reclaimed water for beneficial use to replace withdrawals form the community's fresh water aquifers.

Parks and Recreation

Achieve level of service targets for park land and facilities that support County objectives and priorities.

CF-701

Identify and preserve significant geographic, historic and environmental features and other characteristics that reflect Mason County's natural and cultural heritage.

CF-702

Increase park development within urban areas and develop a comprehensive system of multi-purpose trails throughout the County.

CF-703

CF-704

Develop and adopt a realistic long-range schedule for park management, maintenance, and operation. Adopt a workable County capital improvement program (CIP) every six years, to be amended as needed.

Update current 2006 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan in 2011 to project future demands and needs; define acquisition, leases, and development opportunities; draft financial implementation programs; and be eligible for state and federal grants.

01.04.10

V/-8

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Administrative Services

Develop and implement a long-range program of expansion and improvement to accommodate the County's projected administrative staffing requirements.

CF-801

Annually review the long-range facilities plan for buildings and space improvements to efficiently provide work space for projected staffing levels.

Police and Criminal Justice

Develop and implement a coordinated facility program among the departments and agencies that provide the County's police and criminal justice services.

CF-901

Complete a strategic long-range plan for the effective and coordinated operation and management of all County police and criminal justice functions, including a full analysis of all space and facility needs required to support the plan.

CF-902

Explore alternative funding sources for law and justice facilities and operations, including contracts for service with other agencies and joint use of facilities.

Stormwater Management

Create a facilities strategy that preserves and supplements necessary natural drainage processes and other natural systems to minimize runoff impacts from development.

CF-1001

Investigate needs and means for implementing and maintaining a safe and costeffective storm and stormwater collection system in identified problem areas.

CF-1002

CF-1003

Protect surface and ground water quality through state and local controls and public education on water quality issues.

Design stormwater systems to meet the approval standards prescribed in the

Mason County Stormwater Management Ordinance.

CF-1004

CF-1005

CF-1006

CF-1007

CF-1008

Protect physical and biological integrity of wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, and other identified critical areas.

Maintain water quality within all Shoreline Management Act waterfront areas through careful design, operation, construction, and placement of public facilities.

Carefully control development in areas with steep slopes where surface water runoff can create unstable conditions. Maintain natural vegetation for slope stabilization.

Public facility development shall minimize impacts to shorelines, preserving the natural stream environments where possible.

Comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and state regulations.

01.04.10

V/-9

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

CF-1009

Under no circumstances should hazardous waste be allowed to contaminate the groundwater, surface water, or sewer systems of Mason County. Dispose of hazardous wastes only in locations designated for that purpose.

Solid Waste

Ensure that garbage collection and recycling needs of the County are met in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

CF-11 01

Manage a cost-effective and responsive solid waste collection system.

CF-1102

Manage solid waste collection methods to minimize litter, neighborhood disruption, and degradation of the environment.

CF-1103

CF-1104

Promote the recycling of solid waste materials through waste reduction and source separation. Develop educational materials on recycling and other waste reduction methods.

Work cooperatively with cities, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and the Mason County Health District to achieve an environmentally safe and costeffective solution to the disposal of catch basin wastes and street sweepings.

V/-10

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Vl.3 WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES

Introduction

Capital Facilities

The County owns and operates small water and sewer systems for the Rustlewood, and

Beard's Cove communities. In addition, the County operates a medium-sized wastewater collection system and treatment plant for the North Bay Case Inlet area. This area was defined through studies of the area contributing human sewage contamination to Case Inlet, and the system service area was set accordingly. In the smaller community-based systems, there is no planned expansion beyond the existing platted lots. These systems currently provide services to approximately 1200 customers, with the potential to serve an additional 100. The North Bay

Case Inlet system provides service to approximately 950 customers, with additional capacity to serve an estimated 850 additional equivalent residential units within the existing service area.

The Belfair Water Reclamation facility is under design and is expected to be operational by late

2010. This Membrane BioReactor plant will treat sewage from more developed areas of the

Belfair UGA to Class A reclaimed status. Future sewer extensions and plant upgrades will follow a schedule, which will provide service to the entire Belfair UGA by 2025.

The following "Water'' and "Wastewater'' sections provide project-level detail on the planned improvements necessary to meet state regulatory guidelines in the provision of water and wastewater services for these systems. Each project in each section is accompanied by a separate project sheet, which provides a description, and justification, along with a table depicting the estimated costs and funding sources for planning period 2008 through 2013. A summary table that provides overall costs and funding sources for each water and sewer system follows each section.

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

Financing the planned utility improvements requires the use of grants, loans, utility fees, system development charges, developer contributions, and capital reserves. The specific combination of funds, and the availability of grants and loans,will affect user rates for each system as well as the timing on projects. The ability to initiate specific projects will be assessed annually based on the urgency of need, reserve funds available, and commitments from funding agencies to provide grants and/or loans. The decisions about whether or not to proceed with any planned project is the decision of the Mason County Board of Commissioners for consideration in the annual budgeting and rate-setting process. To the extent possible, projects will be funded through:

Rate revenues (capital reserves)

Grants;

Low interest loans; or developer contributions

Some combination of 1-4 above.

Project costs shown in each section range in accuracy from + or- 40% to + or- 15%. Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown, based on the following scale:

01.04.10

V/-11

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

• "Planning Level"- The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of+ or- 40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time.

• "Design Report"- Moderate accuracy, in the range of+ or- 30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs.

• "Engineer's Estimate"- Most accurate estimate, in the range of+ or -15%. These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of design work.

Future System Development

Included in the wastewater sections of this document are additional projects that are not associated with the existing County-owned utility systems. These projects represent efforts to provide utility services to areas which have been identified as problems with regard to density and water quality, but where no established systems are currently in place. There are two such areas where the County is currently investing resources in the long-term resolution of identified problems:

Belfair Urban Growth Area

The County has amended the Belfair/Lower Hood Canal Water Reclamation Facility Plan

Supplemental Information to reflect the most recent population projections and the proposed service area boundary for the Belfair sewer project. The Department of Ecology in May 2007 approved the Belfair Facility Plan which outlines the development of an MBR facility adjacent to the UGA as the preferred action for treatment of sewage from Belfair

Hoodsport /Skokomish Area

A Tri-Party planning and implementation group that includes Mason County, Public Utility

District #1 and the Skokomish Indian Tribe was formed in 2006 to improve water quality in the middle and upper reaches of Hood Canal. Sewer facility plans has been completed for the

Hoodsport Rural Activity, the Potlach State Park Area and major portions of the Skokomish

Tribal lands. The funding for any recommended system development will initially be provided through grants and/or loans until there is an established rate base to provide payments for the system.

V/-12

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 -(updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities,

&

Waste Management

Fund: 403- North Bay Sewer System

Project Name: Minor Facility and System Improvements Program

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: Annual improvements program for system facilities, buildings, and grounds.

Projects may include small piping improvements, pump stations, lighting, exterior painting, and other general improvements.

Justification: The treatment plant and system construction provided basic functionality, however the facilities and system need improvements from time to time to correct deficiencies and improve operational capabilities. Plant operations and system maintenance staff are not equipped to address these types of improvements in addition to the plant operations. It is also anticipated that the work can be completed professionally and more expediently through contracts with specialty firms.

Prelim Engineering

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013

2014 2015

TOTAL

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

74

74

74

74

50

50

50

50

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

224

224

224

224

V/-13

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Fund: 403-North Bay Sewer System

Capital Facilities

Project Name: Treatment Plant Capacity Upgrades

Estimates: Planning Level

Description:

Analyze the options for providing additional treatment plant capacity and provide engineering to design the improvements for construction in subsequent years.

Justification:

The existing plant may be reaching design capacity for treatment in 2010. This will require us to revisit the original sewer facility plan and address how we will maintain sufficient capacity for the twenty-year period beyond 2010. This project outlines the need for funding to conduct the analysis and design the next increment of capacity for the plant. The recent economic slowdown has negatively affected the growth rate and receipt of capital facility charges associated with new connections. Therefore this effort has been postponed until 2011 or beyond depending on the rate of recovery.

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

40 40

0

125

165 0

0 0

0

125

165

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING: 0

165

165 0 0

0

0 165

V/-14

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities,

&

Waste Management

Capital Facilities

Fund: 403-North Bay Sewer System

Project Name: Basin Analysis and Developer Review Services

Estimates: Engineers Estimate

Description: Engineering services to assist staff in planning for future development and developer review

Justification: The Allyn UGA will develop and grow. Currently there are many large lots that will be divided and platted. There are also many small lots that will be combined and developed. In addition many of the rights of way and easements have been vacated and are now private property. This analysis will assist county staff with the identification of sewer system expansion needs within the UGA and with review of developer submittals as this growth occurs.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL

Prelim

Engineering

20 20 20 20 20 120 Design

Engineering

Construction

20

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants (.09 funds)

20

Loans

Rates

TOTAL

FUNDING:

20

20

20

0

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

120

120

120

120

01.04.10

V/-15

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities,

&

Waste Management

Fund: 412 Beards Cove Water

Project Name: Beards Cove Booster Pump

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: Installation of a booster pump to improve water pressure to residences near the water storage tank and provide additional fire flow to the entire community.

Justification: Currently only the top 16.7 feet or 120,000 gallons of the 60' 400,000 gallon

Storage tank can be considered for usable storage. The total requirement for this system identified in the 2002 water system plan is 250,050 gallons. That document identified fire flow as 500 gpm for 30 minutes or 15,000 gallons. That number has increased to 45,000 gallons under the code adopted by the county since the water plan was written. Technically the system is 150,000 gallons deficient on usable storage. The addition of a booster pump to provide pressure to all homes with an elevation within 57' of the storage tank base will allow for the use of the systems entire water storage capability and meet the system's storage requirements.

Mason County will apply for a grant loan package to assist in funding of this project.

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

2015

TOTAL

150

150

30

70

50

150

150

150

30

70

50

150

01.04.10

Vl-16

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities & Waste Management

Capital Facilities

Fund: 411 -Beards Cove Water

Project Name: Beards Cove Water System Meter Installations

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: Installation of Water Service meters on all new and existing water service connections

Justification: The Water Use Efficiency Rule requires all water systems install service meters by 2018. Although the rule allows twelve years to implement installation, the community will benefit by implementing the process as soon as possible. The community will benefit from meters by providing leakage data and allow billing based on usage. This plan is designed to fund this effort entirely through rates. The water rate must increase from 27 per month to 32 to fund the effort.

Prelim EnQineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COSTS:

Funding Sources:

Grants*

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011

2012

2013

2014 2015

TOTAL

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

500

500

500

500

V/-17

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities & Waste Management

Capital Facilities

Fund: 411 - Rustlewood Water

Project Name: Rustlewood Water System Plan

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: Develop a Small Water System Plan

Justification: There is currently no plan in place. To secure future public grants and loan funding for needed improvements to the system a Small Water System Plan is required.

E r t d P · t c t r th d )

2010

2011

2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

5

5

Design Engineering

Construction

5 5

TOTAL COSTS:

Funding Sources:

Grants*

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

5

5

5

5

V/-18

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-1015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Fund: 405- Capital Development Fund

Capital Facilities

Project Name: Belfair Sewer Development

Estimates: Engineering

Description: Design and develop documents required for constructing the Belfair Sewer

Collection and Reclamation Facilities and provide construction management services.

Justification: In 2007 the County entered into an agreement with CH2MHill to design the

Belfair Sewer Utility. The initial project will begin construction sometime in 2009 and should be completed sometime between late 2010 or early 2011. Extensions and expansion will continue until the entire Urban Growth Area is served. Much of the expansion of this system will be developer funded however it is typical for a utility to assist and support this effort.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

1500

1500

500 250

100

100

3750

Construction 15000 10000 3000

1000

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

16500

16500 11500 3500 1250

16500

11500

11500

3500

3500

1250

1250

200

400

200

200

400

200 28400

400 33500

33500

400

400 33500

V/-19

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities,

&

Waste Management

Fund: 405- Capital Development Fund

Project Name: Hoodsport Sewer Design

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: Design the Hoodsport Sewer System

Justification: The low oxygen levels in Hood Canal are partly attributed to the inability of onsite septic systems to reduce nitrogen. By conveying wastewater to a technologically advanced sewage treatment facility that can significantly reduce nitrogen, and apply the effluent upland, this project will reduce the human contribution of nutrients to the waters of Hood Canal.

Hoodsport will be the second of the three South Shore Hood Canal projects undertaken by the

Tri-Party Group.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013

2014 2015

TOTAL

Prelim Engineerin_g

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

990

510

7500

990

8010

990 8010

990 8010

1500

7500

9000

9000

9000

Vl-20

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Capital Facilities

Fund: 403- North Bay Sewer System

Project Name: North Bay Biosolids Handling

Estimates: Planning Leval

Description: Biosolids Handling Facilities

Justification: The treatment plant at North Bay has continued to experience increases in biosolids handling and disposal costs. By thickening and developing a composting operation these costs will be significantly reduced. Preliminary analysis shows capital cost recovery would be realized in three to four years.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

10

70

80

80

10

70

80

80

V/-21

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Vl.4

SOLID WASTE UTILITY

Introduction

Capital Facilities

Mason County's solid waste utility provides transfer and disposal operations for solid waste at four transfer station locations, including household recyclable materials. The largest transfer

.facility is located outside Shelton on Eels Hill Road. Materials collected from the other smaller stations at Hoodsport, Union, and Belfair, are transported to the Shelton facility, where garbage is processed into containers that are trucked to Centralia, WA. From there, the material is longhauled via railroad to Roosevelt Landfill in Klickitat County, located in Eastern Washington.

Household hazardous wastes (HHW) are collected and disposed of by Mason County staff at the Shelton transfer facility. Residents in North Mason County can take their HHW to the Kitsap

County transfer station. This arrangement is established through interlocal agreement and

Mason County pays approximately $60 per customer for collection and disposal or materials from residents who take their materials to the Kitsap County facility.

The Shelton transfer facility is located at the former Mason County Landfill. The current utility provides post-closure monitoring and capital construction in support of the closed landfill. The

Shelton facility receives wastes collected by private and municipal haulers operating inside

Mason County.

The Belfair and Shelton transfer facilities are nearing capacity in terms of the tonnage they can effectively handle on a daily basis. Growth in the Belfair area and elsewhere in the County continues to impact operations at these facilities and capacity improvements will need to be addressed in the future.

The following pages provide details on specific projects proposed for the current capital facilities planning period. Project estimates range in accuracy from + or- 40% to + or- 15%. Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown based on the following scale:

• "Planning Level"- The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of+ or- 40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time.

• "Design Report"- Moderate accuracy, in the range of+ or- 30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs.

• "Engineer's Estimate"- Most accurate estimate, in the range of+ or -15%. These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of the design work.

01.04.10

V/-22

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Capital Facilities

Fund: 402- Solid Waste

Project Name: Minor Facility Improvements

Estimates: Design Report

Description:

Annual program to ensure continued operational effectiveness of transfer station facilities and preserve existing assets. Improvements will include: road resurfacing, facility roof replacements, minor building modifications, storage or handling facility construction, or modifications to comply with regulatory requirements or preserve capacity.

Justification:

Normal operation of transfer station facilities requires ongoing facility improvements to existing fixed assets to maintain overall operational capabilities. Providing an annual program and funding to complete these improvements is more efficient from an administrative perspective and prudent in terms of ensuring the longevity of existing assets.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Tipping Fees

TOTAL FUNDING:

141

141

141

141

141

141

141

141

V/-23

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Fund: 402- Solid Waste

Capital Facilities

Project Name: Belfair Household Hazardous Waste Facility Improvements

Estimates: Design Report

Description: Design and construct a facility to provide household hazardous waste collection services to north county residents.

Justification: Currently north county residents must take their household hazardous waste to the Kitsap County facility. This service is provided through an interlocal agreement that costs

$60.00 per visit. The costs are the same no matter what type of material is dropped off at their facility. Our own facility would save us considerable cost for disposal of less harmful materials such as motor oil or latex paints. Operation of a county-owned facility would allow us to tailor the hours of operation and types of material accepted to decrease these costs.

E f t d P . t C m ousan s

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Tipping Fees

TOTAL FUNDING:

4

31

35

35

35

4

31

35

35

35

V/-24

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities,

&

Waste Management

Fund: 402- Solid Waste

Project Name: Household Hazardous Waste Facility Improvements

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Design Report

Description:

This facility serves the south end of the county by providing residential drop off of household generated hazardous wastes. The volumes of materials have been increasing annually, and the facility is both outgrowing its current structure and behind on needed safety improvements. Further, the changes in regulations in recent years and the near future will necessitate increased capacity.

Justification:

Due to policy changes at the state and national level, the facility itself is inadequate to meet the standards mandated. Since some of these changes are state priorities, state funding may be available.

Prelim Engineering

c osts m t ousan s

2010 2011 2012 2013

2014 2015

I

TOTAL

3 3

50 50

Design Engineering

Capital Equipment

(scale)

Construction

98 98

151 151

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

95

56

151

95

56

151

V/-25

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities,

&

Waste Management

Fund: 402- Shelton Transfer Station

Project Name: Transfer Station System Improvements

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: This facility serves as a hub for all the garbage in Mason County. When originally constructed in the early 1990's, throughput was a fraction of current levels. In order to safely and efficiently serve the needs of the public and our commercial accounts, a second access road with a scale is needed. Other minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typical wear and tear.

Justification: Over the past 15 years, the number of customers has grown dramatically, along with tons exported. Steps to improve customer safety, reduce wait times, and increase efficiency for commercial customers will allow the facility to postpone major construction for this planning period.

Prelim Engineering

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

3 3

21

100

21

100

Design Engineering

Capital Equipment

(scale)

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Other: timber

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

190

314

100

50

214

314

190

314

100

50

214

314

01.04.10

V/-26

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Fund: 402- Belfair Drop Box

Project Name: Belfair Improvements

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: This facility serves the north end of the County by providing residential drop off of wastes and recyclables five days a week. Growth in the portion of the County is significant, and will likely increase at the current high rate for the near future. Minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typical wear and tear. A wholly new facility, with a scale and compaction equipment, may be necessary by the end of this planning period.

Justification: Currently, our system is able to support the Belfair area. However, the current and projected growth may exceed the capacity of this facility in the relatively near future. Due to the location, it does not make sense to increase the tonnage without exporting directly to rail, or at least to rail containers. To do so, a new facility would be necessary.

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Capital Equipment

(scale)

Construction

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

6 6

25

250

296

25

250

296

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Other: timber

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

577

50

100

427

577

577

50

100

427

577

01.04.10

V/-27

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Fund: 402- Hoodsport Drop Box

Project Name: Hoodsport Improvements

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: This facility serves the north and west end of the County by providing residential drop

off

of wastes and recyclables two days a week. Growth in this portion of the County is occurring, and will likely increase in the near future. Minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typical wear and tear.

Justification: Currently, our system is able to support the Hoodsport area. However, the current and projected growth may exceed the capacity of this facility in the relatively near future, which can be addressed by simply increasing the days and hours of operation.

Prelim Engineering

E f t d P . t C t (" th

d )

2010

2011

2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

3

3

Design Engineering

Capital Equipment

(scale)

Construction 43 43

46

46 TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Other: timber

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

46

46

46

46

V/-28

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities,

&

Waste Management

Fund: 402- Union Drop Box

Project Name: Union Improvements

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning Level

Description:

This facility serves the south end of the canal area by providing residential drop off of wastes and recyclables two days a week. Growth in this portion of the County is occurring, and will likely increase in the near future. Minor improvements and enhancements will be required to maintain the system over the next few years, such as road work, tip walls, and typical wear and tear.

Justification:

Currently, our system is able to support the Union area. However, the current and projected growth may exceed the capacity of this facility in the relatively near future, which can be addressed by simply increasing the days and hours of operation.

Prelim Engineering

E f t d P . t C t (" th

d )

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

TOTAL

3

3

Design Engineering

Capital Equipment

(scale)

Construction

43

46

43

46

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

Other: timber

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

46

46

46

46

V/-29

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Vl.5 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES

System Description

Recreational opportunities in Mason County include parks for day-use activities and overnight camping; fresh and salt water areas for boating and other water sports; facilities and equipment for sports and play activities; and wilderness areas and other open spaces for hiking, hunting,

ORV use, and horseback riding.

Existing parks and recreation facilities in Mason County are available through a variety of public and private entities. Federal and state facilities include camping, boating, and day-use parks.

The County-owned park system includes day-use and water access facilities, sports fields, and related recreational areas. Other agencies providing park and recreational resources include municipalities, port districts, and public schools. Some private recreational facilities are open to the public as well.

Mason County has adopted a Parks and Recreation Plan in November of 2006 and a Mason

County Regional Trails Plan in March of 2008. Both of these plans are incorporated herein by reference.

County Park Facilities

The County currently manages 21 park properties in Mason County two of which are undeveloped, and three others have large portions that are also undeveloped. Of the developed parks, two are large baseball/softball complexes, five provide saltwater access parks, three are located on freshwater lakes, and three provide upland day use and recreation facilities

(see

FIGURE VI.S-1).

In addition to the day use facilities, the County also owns and maintains one above-ground skate park. The conditions of these facilities vary by location, however, significant investment in facilities has been made in the last two years from Real Estate Excise

Tax proceeds (REET 2) and grant proceeds from the Recreation and Conservation Office. The capital plan for the next six years continues this trend of investment in park development and facility upgrades. The heavy use and demand from both county and non-County residents are particularly high during the spring, summer and fall.

In recent years, parks operated by Mason County have received substantial increases in visitors. Total visits increased 52 percent from 1992 to 1993, from 180,600 to 274,500 annual visits. Nearly half of the total increase was at Sandhill Park, a sports park in Belfair. Sandhill's visitation increased by 230 percent, from 20,300 to 67,000 visits, due in large part to increased use of the park by local baseball, softball, and soccer leagues. Sandhill Park received significant improvements in 2006 and use of this park has continued to grow. Mason County

Recreation Area, the largest baseball/softball complex has grown in use the last several years and is now recognized regionally as a preferred site for major tournaments. The spike in fuel prices in 2008 and the global recession has also led to increased park use as people are staying closer to home to recreate.

There are no facilities for overnight camping throughout the Mason County Parks system. The last county-wide park plan was developed in 1991 and subsequently updated in 2006. Camping options will be examined in the long-term development plan being crafted for these and other park properties with large portions of undeveloped land. Mason County developed a new

01.04.10

V/-30

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities county-wide parks plan in 2006, which includes analysis and recommendations to address recreation needs within the county. Camping by special use permit has been approved for

Truman Glick Park and Foothills Park and Walker Park.

Inventory

An inventory of all Mason County parks including federal, state, private, and County-owned parks is listed in

TABLE

Vl.5-1. Also included are the number of acres and amenities available at each park location. The locations of parks and recreational facilities operated by the County are shown on

FIGURE

Vl.5-1.

Figure

Vl.5-1

Counly

Mason County

County Parks

KitsapCounty

.Harbor

Co~..:nty

V/-31

Thut5ton County

A C'..<.Ltl(yP,>rf.::.

/"'./OowtyRNC>

A/

Hl~!k.rt~

0eolrq.&1¥1L:!ri:-~

F1ukir-~l~d c:::J!)j)':llp.::N.11i;;n:Jif<>rf:'rt

DOiy•11Pi::Nol!iuu!!Puil n

--..J

5MrlP..::

P:llLi.=J&;• l'.=i~Cot.rlt ~-U..-

1'l.J.-c::. :;,:;: lmt<c:~'OJ:(h,rn<'>rU-1i•<'.:,_"rr<-~

D=l-•"~~~ t f"\b~''t<ll=<l~t· <1~11!'11''1~£, u;>.tr( t'o~<t; f-'>'."'t~ Ut" hw• ""'

1!.,_.1<1>'1:{

;>rd

01~;:.-t• t;nu:,

H,'<Jr;~g~r ;>"I' lf;>;.l.~··'i< t~::: l"t•T t~: \.' .. \ 1.):-~ ~I tlo:u:dl':t: .. ::<l= -iifl<.<r>'J. ClJ .. <i·t:::;\11:+1 \-,:i;n,; f~re.:

,1,]

='•I~ ~~U'\.J;(o':ll<f« 'ooJio• l'd:Cil

C:J.Pl~· F\vl<.'

~-·~·1:>

~:~ ~:.;:-;~,:~·«:~ ~~~::.~ lm!r, ...... "~~~ '~:t~ u,..,.. .....

·:::::.:

~'::~~;

~·•v.• ~:am,'''''"

•->

~;~;!r~:;;;;-.;;;,..,;,;~::.;.;.7~~~r.~ ~;;,~~(l l:v.u ...,,...,.dK t11"-~:t

;it.> • .., o;~-,h'"· ....: ...,.

0'(~~,..~;'~"' IH!o<~·-..t·~ 0"<' .)•;• "'~7'>''

'"'

•<t

:"!·>;~ ti.:IH <I~Hio~f..o"o>l><lillloo"•lpi.)'.AO.• <l-4.:0:.41<1"1;...

~~~

..

.,...,...,..,~,

...

•• ., u,.~· ;:.-.,~~~-·~~

.....

,.,~."

.., ..

"::;;~~;;~;.~.r:-:4~.,;~ .~·!~.:! ~.:..:-:;;•

~~;;;~.;;;).~~·:.:~.~~;.'~'t';:';~.~~~·~·«'tr. ocd;OI(J;o\1:o·t<n.1>:.'0.U'""-""~"':dl>"<>-~"-l;t tv.ro<.-l«><><l>...,jfo: ... l.,b<r.l<'tl;tdl:(..-1 ..... 1~ffll¢'

..,,,,

,~

,,.,(J"'" .....

~"'"'

:·::-::.~,:;,;Aog!'<:Y.Nocyii'W""l11~1>htr..:;,l;<rl.>1>:4

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

TABLE

Vi.5-1. Inventory of Parks

Name of Facility

Washington State Parks

Belfair State Park

Harstine Island State

Park

Hoodsport Trails

Hope Island

Jarrells Cove

Lake Isabella

Acres

62.77 (3,780 ft tidelands)

310(3,100ft tidelands)

80

106

(8,540 ft tidelands)

42.6

(3,500 ft tidelands)

193.75

Amenities Available

Camping: 134 tent sites, 47 utility sites, primitive sites, wheelchair accessible trails, trailer dump facility.

Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: day use area; walking/hiking trails; 50 campsites.

Natural area with trails.

Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: trails; picnic tables; rest rooms; 6 to 8 campsites; group camping for 150 people.

Washington Water Trails site.

Camping: 20 tent sites; group site for maximum of

64 people, 2 picnic shelters, facilities for handicapped, wheelchair accessible trails, marine pump out station, 2 docks providing 500 feet of moorage, 14 mooring buoys. Fee required.

Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: full-service park, camping, picnic area, lakefront beach, and restrooms. Plans will be completed in the next 10 to 20 years.

Lilliwaup Tide Land

McMicken Island

Potlatch State Park

Schafer State Park

Squaxin Island

Name of Facility

Stretch Point

Twanoh State Park

Total

( 4,1 00 ft tidelands) Tidelands for public use. No facilities. Small shoulder area for parking.

11.45 Currently undeveloped. Boater destination;

(1,660 ft tidelands) clamming. Plans to develop include: 5 to 8 camping sites, composting toilet.

56.95 Camping: 17 tent sites; 18 utility sites; primitive

(9,570 ft tidelands) sites. Underwater park, trailer dump facilities.

119

31.4

Acres

Camping: 47 tent sites, 6 utility sites, primitive sites, day use group area, trailer dump facilities

Closed indefinitely.

Amenities Available

4.2

(610ft tidelands)

Natural area. Day use only; 5 mooring buoys. No plans for future development.

182 Camping: 30 tent sites, 9 utility sites, primitive sites,

(3, 167 ft tideland) handicapped facilities, and wheelchair accessible trails.

1208.02

(38,027 ft tideland)

01.04.10

Vl-32

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

TABLE Vl.5-1. Inventory of Parks (Continued)

Name of Facility

Aldrich Lake

Benson Lake

Cady Lake

Clara Lake

Devereaux Lake

Haven Lake

Island Lake access

Isabella Lake

Lake Kokanee

Lake Limerick

Lost Lake

Lake Nahwatzel

Acres Amenities Available

Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife

0.5 Unpaved boat launch, parking for 15 vehicles.

78.8

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 100 vehicles.

1.6

9

1.3

4.1

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 10 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 40 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 50 vehicles.

1

1.6

44

0.5

1.3

2.0

Freshwater boat launch, toilets.

Boat launch, parking for 20 vehicles.

Boat Launch, parking for 100 vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 30 vehicles.

Boat launch, parking for 40 vehicles.

Boat launch, parking for 10 vehicles, toilets

0.4

20

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 15 vehicles.

Boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

Undeveloped.

Maggie Lake

Mason Lake

Panhandle Lake

Panther Lake

Phillips Lake

Pricket Lake

Skokomish River

Spencer Lake

Tahuya River

Tee Lake

Twin Lake

Union River

Victor access to North

Bay

Wildberry Lake

Wooten Lake

Total

3.8

1

0.5

64

2

2.9

3.6

3.6

61.8

.5

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 40 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

30.6 feet of riverfront, shore access, parking for 20 vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 50 vehicles.

4,400 feet of riverfront, parking for 10 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 20 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 15 vehicles.

8,098 feet of riverfront, parking for 10 vehicles.

Boat launch, pit toilets

10

1

318.3

Undeveloped.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 60 vehicles.

Washington State Department of Natural Resources

Aldrich Lake Camp

Camp Pond

Camp Spillman

Elfendahl Pass Staging

Area

24

(approx.)

10

(approx.)

5

1,700 feet waterfront, hand boat launch, 4 picnic tables, 4 campsites, toilets, drinking water, lake stocked with trout, parking for 16 vehicles.

Day use only

800 feet waterfront, 6 campsites, 4 group sites, toilets, drinking water.

11 picnic sites, self-contained RVs okay, toilets, drinking water

01.04.10

V/-33

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities f>.J<llll~ c:>L~<lC?ili~y

Howell Lake

Kammenqa Canyon

Mission Creek Trailhead

Robbins Lake

Tahuya River Horse

Camp

Acres

1

1.1

12

(approx.)

......... ········

Amenities Available

............................................

~......

3 group sites, 10 campsites, hand boat launch, toilets, drinking water, parking for 20 vehicles.

.

2 campsites, toilets

Parkinq for trail access

175 feet waterfront, hand boat launch, 3 picnic tables, toilets. Day use only.

1 ,600 feet waterfront, 9 campsites, 2 group sites, toilets, drinking water, 20 horse corrals.

Toonerville

Twin Lakes

Melbourne

Lilliwaup

Public Tidelands #24

Public Tidelands #33

Public Tidelands #34

Public Tidelands #43

Public Tidelands #44 a,b

Public Tidelands #46

5.7

7

570 feet waterfront, 4 campsites, 2 picnic sites, toilets.

6 camp sites, 3 picnic sites, toilets, hand boat launch. Lake is stocked with trout.

Lake setting, 1,000 feet waterfront, 5 campsites, toilets.

Stream setting, 500 feet waterfront, 13 campsites, toilets, drinking water.

Water access only.

Water access onlJ'.

Water access onlJ'.

Road access, clamming.

Road access, clamming, crab pot fishing.

Water access only, clamming, oysters, shrimp pot fishing.

Water access only, clamming, oysters.

Water access only, clamming, oysters

Road access, clamming, crabbing.

Public Tidelands #47

Public Tidelands #48

Eagle Creek

Recreational Tidelands

Rendsland Creek

Tidelands

Total

Road access, clamming.

Brown Creek

Campground

Hamma Hamma

Campground

United States Forest Service

6 78 camp sites, toilets.

5 Picnic area, 12 campsites.

Lower Lena Lake

Campground

Upper Lena Lake

Campground

6

7

Hike-in only, 40 camp sites, pit toilets.

Hike-in only, 14 camp sites, pit toilets.

Total 24

City of Shelton Parks and Recreation Department

Brewer Park

I

0.3

I

3 picnic tables, curbside parking only.

01.04.10

V/-34

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Name of Facility

Callanan Park

Acres

6.9

City Park

Eleventh Street Site

Huff and Puff Trail

Kneeland Park

Johnson Park

Loop Field

Oakland Bay Overlook

Pine Street Boat Launch

Total

Port of Dewatto

Port of Dewatto

Campground

Port of Shelton

Sanderson Field

Oakland Bay Marina

Total

1.75

0.92

80

3.9

0.5

4

1.03

60 feet

99.3

1

1 '170

1170

Capital Facilities

Amenities Available

Lighted softball field with spectator stands, 7 picnic tables, 2 swings, 1 slide, rest room, foot trails across 40-foot natural depression, parking space for 30 vehicles plus additional parking along street.

Currently undeveloped.

Deep well location with the potential to be developed into a city park.

2 miles of jogging trail and 20 incorporated exercise stations, drinking fountain and parking for 20 vehicles at trailhead.

2 slides, swings, 1 merry-go-round, horizontal bars,

1 dome climber, 1 large sand box, 1 small log playhouse, a few rocking saddle mates, horseshoe pit, aging rest room and picnic shelter, deteriorated clubhouse, 10 picnic tables, 2 tennis courts in need of resurfacing, street parking for approximately 25 vehicles.

1 merry-go-round, 1 swing, single basketball backboard and substandard concrete court, street parking for approximately 1 0 vehicles.

2 tennis courts, softball field, soccer field, jogging trail along the perimeter, 1 picnic shelter, 5 picnic tables, rest room, parking for 100 vehicles.

Views of downtown Shelton, industrial waterfront,

Oakland Bay, and the Olympic Mountains, historic band saw display with large log section and interpretive information, paved parking for 5 vehicles. Development plans for the next 2 years include: picnic area, rest rooms, kiosk, small shelter, additional parking.

Crude gravel boat launch and a deteriorating wooden boat repair grid.

Camping: 11 with hook-ups, 19 tent sites; 2 rest rooms; nature/hiking trails; 23 picnic tables; two picnic shelters;, 1 kitchen; fishing. Future plans to add more stoves and picnic tables, and to place gravel around kitchen. Fee required.

Flying: 5,000 feet of runway, tie downs, skydiving; rifle club; model aircraft society. Future plans to. provide increased hangar availability.

Boat moorage.

01.04.10

V/-35

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

Name of Facility

Port of Allyn

Waterfront Park in Allyn

Kayak Park

North Shore Ramp

Belfair/North Shore

Port of Hoodsport

lngvald Gronvold

Waterfront Park

Port of Grapeview

Fair Harbor Marina

Mason County

Latimer's Landing overflow parking area

Foothills Park

Harvey Rendsland Jiggs

Lake

Latimer's Landing

(Water)

Mason County

Recreation Area (MCRA

Sport)

Mason Lake Park

(Water)

Phillips Lake County

Park (Picnic)

Acres

2

.3

1.2

2

5

2.5

80

8

3.00

40

17.36

0.4

Amenities Available

400 feet waterfront, moorage, dock (for up to 15 boats), picnic, gazebo, parking for 20 vehicles.

Office buildinq planned.

150 feet waterfront, small parking lot, picnic tables, portable toilet facilities.

150 feet waterfront, boat launch with floating dock, beach access, parking for 20 vehicles with trailers.

Dock, saltwater beach access, tidelands, 2 portable rest rooms.

Boat launch and parking area

Primary use is to provide parking for neighboring

Latimer's Landing, parking for 20 vehicles.

1 field which serves as a multiuse field; basketball court; rest rooms; children's play area; picnic tables; parking for 50 vehicles.

Currently undeveloped; 1,905 feet waterfront.

Saltwater access boat launch for vessels no longer than 20 feet, parking for 10 vehicles, portable toilet, boat dock; additional parking available at neighboring Latimer's Landing overflow parking area. Renovated in 2008.

7 baseball/softball fields which also serve as soccer and football fields; children's play area, bleachers, maintenance shop, user's storage facility, seasonal concession stand, 4 batting cage; parking for 100 vehicles. This facility serves as the headquarters for the Mason County Parks Department. Fee required for scheduled field use.

1.36 acres currently in use; freshwater access/boat launch for small watercraft no longer than 18 feet, dock, play area, rest rooms, 4 picnic table; parking for maximum of 50 vehicles. The County owns 16 unused acres that can be used for expansion of the park (possible trails, picnic area, and remote camping area).

Passive day use area, picnic area, located next to

State of Washington Boar Launch with vault type toilets.

01.04.10

Vl-36

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Name of Facility

Sandhill Park (Sport)

Acres

30

Jacoby Park (Water)

Truman Glick Memorial

Park (Picnic)

Union Community Park

(Picnic)

Union Boat Ramp

(Water)

Hunter Park

Skate Park

Walker Park (Water)

Oakland Bay

Preservation Area

Watson Wildwood View

Mendards Landibng

Park

2.8

35.46

1.92

0.16

.5

.6

5.04

80

36

40

Mason Lake Picnic Park

Harstine Island

Theler Center

Total

Mason County Public Schools

.9

6.9

135

463.03

Belfair Elementary

Sandhill Elementary

Hood Canal

Elementary/Junior High

School

Oakland Bay Middle

School

Olympic Middle School

Pioneer Elementary

Capital Facilities

Amenities Available

7 baseball/softball fields, one multiuse field, bleachers; parking is available for 1 00+ vehicles; concession-restroom building; 4 fields and parking renovated in 2006; walking path around park.

320 feet waterfront, boat launch for vessels no longer than 16 feet, saltwater beach access, 3 picnic tables.

Natural setting, creek, trails, picnic tables, covered group shelter, barbecue pit, vault toilets, RV area.

Future improvements include: possible construction of group camping area and interpretive signage along trails.

Picnic shelter, children's play area; small baseball diamond, basketball court; rest rooms.

Boat ramp for access to Hood Canal, portable toilets, no parking.

2 picnic tables, bus shelter

11 above ground ramps in Shelton

Saltwater access to Hammersley Inlet, gravel beach, picnic tables, barbecues, rest rooms, shelter, children's play area, interpretive center providing marine information; parking for 15 vehicles.

Habitat preservation area and education center

(currently undeveloped)

Undeveloped

Recently transferred from the Port of Tahuya to

County. Parks provices beach access, picnic areas, gazebo, portable toilet, access to DNR tidelands, small boat launch for kayaks and canoes

Undeveloped

Undeveloped

Wetlands interpretive trails

Playground.

Playground.

2 baseball backstops, 1 football field, bleachers, playground, track, parking for 30 vehicles.

X

X

2 baseball backstops, covered play area, playground.

01.04.10

V/-37

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010)

Acres Name of Facility

Grapeview

Elementary

Southside

Elementary

Bordeaux

Evergreen

Elementary

Mountain View

Elementary

Shelton High School

Mary M. Knight

District

North Mason High

School

Private Facilities Open to the Public

Shelton/South Mason

Soccer Park

Glen Ayr Canal Resort

Lake Nahwatzel Resort

Minerva Beach RV

Resort and Mobile

Village

Rest-A-While RV Park and Marina

Lake Cushman

14

10

2

20

15

602.9

Capital Facilities

Amenities Available

Playground

1 baseball backstop.

Football field, soccer field, playground, track.

Playground.

5 baseball backstops, football field, soccer field, playground.

6 tennis courts, 2 baseball backstops, football field, soccer field, bleachers, 2 swimming pools, track, rest rooms.

2 baseball backstops, 1 football field, bleachers, playground.

2 baseball backstops, 2 tennis courts, football field, soccer field, bleachers, playground, track.

6 soccer fields, 1 under development

Adult-only RV park with hookups; no tent camping, motel, 2 rest rooms, 2 showers, laundry facility, saltwater boat launch, beach access, tidelands, spa, fishing, clamming, oysters, dock.

Camping: 12 utility sites, 5 sites without hookups; 2 rest rooms, 2 showers, boat launch, freshwater beach access, nature/hiking trails, 8 picnic tables, restaurant, fishing, swimmin_g~ cabins.

Camping: 23 sites without hookups, 50 sites with hookups; 5 rest rooms, 6 showers, laundry facilities, boat launch, saltwater beach access, 60 picnic tables, driving range, scuba dive center.

Saltwater boat launch, moorage, dock, 70-80 camp sites with hookups (may be used for RVs or tents),

4 rest rooms, 4 showers, laundry facilities, beach access, clamming, oysters, fishing, boat rentals, nature trail, 60 picnic tables, 2 covered picnic areas with kitchen, concession stand. Future improvements include easier access to marina, and boat fuel.

Camping: 51 tent sites, 30 utility sites, 2 primitive walk-in sites, group site with cooking shelter for maximum of 56 people, rest rooms with showers; facilities for handicapped, boat launch, trailer dump facility.

Total 663.9

01.04.10

Vl-38

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

Name of Facility

Other

Olympic National Park -

Staircase Campground

Tacoma City Light

Saltwater Park

Mike's Beach Resort

Robin Hood Village

COUNTY TOTAL

Acres Amenities Available

Picnic area, 50 campsites, parking for 60 vehicles.

6 picnic tables, rest rooms, saltwater boat launch, saltwater beach access.

Boat launch, SCUBA diving, cabins, camping, beach access for guests

16 RV sites, cabins, camping, beach access for guests

632167.27

Projects

The following pages provide details on specific Park projects proposed for the current capital facilities planning period.

V/-39

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000

351.000.000

594.80.41.1000

594.76.63.1000

Planning

Development

Project Name:

Estimates:

Watson Wildwood County Park

Construction Level

Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services. Phase one is a master plan for the Park. Phase 2 would include development of a parking area, restroom, trails, and passive recreation. Park is 35 acres and was donated to the County.

Development would provide infrastructure for public access

Justifications: There is no current plan of record for this park site and is the only County Park between Allyn and the Pierce County Border. Site also has potential as a trailhead for a

Regional Trail in the area. st1mate dP . tC t

2010

2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Planning, Design 25,000 25,000

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

290,000

25,000 290,000 315,000

Funding Sources:

In House 25,000 290,000

315,000

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: 25,000 290,000 315,000

01.04.10

V/-40

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 676.80.41.1100 Planning

351.000.000 594.76.63.1000 Development

Capital Facilities

Project Name:

Estimates:

Union Boat Ramp

Construction Level

Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development to renovate the existing County Boat Ramp in Union on Hood Canal.

Justifications: Project listed as a high priority in the 2006 County Parks Plan. Project would enhance water access and boating.

2010 tma e roJec

OS S

2011 2012 2013

50,000

2014 2015 Total

50,000

Planning, Design

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

465,000

15,000 90,000

35,000 375,000

50,000 465,000

465,000

515,000

105,000

410,000

515,000

V/-41

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.0500

Capital Facilities

Project Name:

Sandhill Park Renovation

Construction Level Estimates:

Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services to complete the renovation of Sandhill Park. Main work would include the renovation of fields #1,

#2, and #3. New backstops, ADA access, irrigation, and complete field renovation would be included.

Justifications: This project is listed as a high priority in the 2006 Park Plan. Plan recommended improving existing facilities before developing new facilities.

2010 s Jma e roJeC

OS S

2011 2012 2013 2014

75,000

2015

Total

75,000 Planning, Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

725,000

800,000

400,000

400,000

800,000

725,000

800,000

400,000

400,000

800,000

Vl-42

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks

&

Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.1700

Harvey Rendsland County Park Planning and Improvements

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: Would involve completing a park plan to facilitate public access to the park and then the development of a parking area, picnic facility, passive recreation and support facilities.

Justifications: This park was donated to Mason County in 2007 by Washington State Parks. It provides water access to Jiggs Lake. Water access is the top priority in the 2006 County Parks

Plan. Additional developed park space is needed on the Tahuya Peninsula.

Planning and

n,.....,,...;,... .....

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

2010

Total Costs: 17,000

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

17,000

17,000

0

17,000 s 1ma e rojec

OS S

2011 2012 2013

265,000

265,000

115,000

150,000

265,000

2014 2015 Total

17,000

265,000

282,000

132,000

150,000

0

282,000

Vl-43

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.1400

Capital Facilities

Project Name:

Estimates:

Phillips Lake County Park

Construction Level

Description: Scope of this project includes basic park improvements, including park amenities such as tree removal, picnic tables, park benches, trash containers, and signage.

Justifications: This small park has had very little in the way of improvements and is needed.

Planning, Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

2010 s 1ma e rojec

OS S

2011 2012 2013

10,000

10,000

10,000

10,000

2014 2015 Total

10,000

10,000

10,000

10,000

V/-44

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

Estimates:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks

&

Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.1300

Oakland Bay County Park

Construction Level

Description: The Oakland Bay property was purchased jointly by the County and the Capitol

Land Trust. Project scope would involve a two-phase development program for the park. The first phase would concentrate on public access facilities, the entry road, parking area, restrooms, and signage. The second phase would concentrate on trail development, environmental education facilities, and interpretative displays.

Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan as a high priority for implementation.

2010 s 1ma e roJeC

OS S

2011 2012 2013

2014

2015

Planning and

Design

Site Prep &

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

700,000

700,000

350,000

350,000

700,000

700,000

700,000

350,000

350,000

700,000

Total

1,400,000

1,400,000

700,000

700,000

1,400,000

01.04.10

V/-45

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.1600

Menards Landing County Park

Construction Level Estimates:

Description: This park was transferred from the Port of Tahuya to Mason County in 2006.

Project scope includes improvements that would incorporate ADA access improvements, new picnic facilities, non-motorized watercraft improvements to the present launch site, and new park amenities such as park benches and garbage cans,

Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan as a priority for implementation. s 1ma e rojec

OS S

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Total

2010

Planning and

Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

50,000

50,000

Funding Sources:

50,000 In House

Grants

·Loans

Total Funding: 50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

V/-46

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

Estimates:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.0300

Mason County Recreation Area (MCRA) Improvements

Construction Level

Capital Facilities

Description: Project scope would involve needed renovations and improvements to MCRA

Park. The improvements include: new field lights, restroom renovation, irrigation improvements, drainage upgrades, new office, new bleachers, play equipment surfacing, asphalt, scoreboards, and concession building.

Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan for implementation.

2010

Estimated Project c osts

2011

2012 2013 2014 2015

Planning and

Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

800,000

800,000

400,000

400,000

800,000

800,000

800,000

400,000

400,000

800,000

Total

1,600,000

1,600,000

800,000

800,000

1,600,000

V/-47

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

Estimates:

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000

Mason County Boat Launch Renovation

Construction Level

594.76.63.0400

Description: Renovation of existing boat launch facility, including the boat ramp, dock, entry and exit road, and parking improvements. The parking would be improved and expanded, entry road widened, and restroom improved for ADA accessibility.

Justifications: Park has not been renovated since initial development. Listed in 2006 Parks

Plan for renovation and expansion. ADA improvements are needed, especially access to dock and restrooms.

s 1ma e roJec

OS S

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Total

2010

Preliminary

Engineering

Site Prep &

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction 469,750

Total Costs:

469,750

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

105,750

364,000

Loans

Total Funding:

469,750

469,750

469,750

105,750

364,000

469,750

939,500

939,500

211,500

778,000

1,014,500

V/-48

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.0220

351.000.000 576.80.41.0220 - Planning

Project Name:

Latimers Landing County Park

Construction Level Estimates:

Description:

Scope of this project includes planning and design to develop 2.4 acres of undeveloped land at Latimers Landing into additional boat and trailer parking, and public access to Pickering Passage. The 2.4 acres was purchased in 2008 to compliment the .59 acre

Latimers Landing Boat Launch.

Justifications:

Project listed as a high priority in the 2006 County Parks Plan. Project would enhance water access and provide additional parking for boats and trailers.

2010

Planning, Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

80,000

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

25,000

55,000

80,000 s 1ma e roJec

OS S

2011 2012 2013

750,000

185,000

565,000

750,000

2014 2015

Total

80,000

750,000

830,000

210,000

620,000

830,000

V/-49

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks

&

Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.2000

Capital Facilities

Project Name:

Lake Nahwatzel County Park·

Construction Level Estimates:

Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services to develop a future waterfront park on Lake Nahwatzel. Project would be completed in cooperation with Green Diamond Resource Company.

Justifications: This project is listed as a high priority in the 2006 Park Plan because is addressed a parkland deficiency in western Mason County and also provides water access.

2010

Planning, Design

Site Prep &

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Ef t d P . tC t

2011 2012 2013 2014

250,000

250,000

500,000

2015

100,000

500,000 400,000

500,000 500,000

250,000

250,000

Total

100,000

900,000

1,000,000

500,000

500,000

500,000 1,000,000

V/-50

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.0600

Project Name:

Estimates:

Jacoby Park (Shorecrest) Improvements

Construction Level

Description:

Project scope would involve implementation of Park Improvement Plan based on

Park Site Plan developed in

2008.

Improvements would provide more amenities at the park than what currently exist.

Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan for implementation.

2010 st1mate d P . C osts

2011 2012 2013

10,000

2014 2015

Planning and

Desiqn

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

180,000

190,000

190,000

190,000

Total

10,000

180,000

190,000

190,000

190,000

V/-51

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

Estimates:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks

&

Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.1900

Goldsborough Creek County Park

Construction Level

Description: Scope of this project would include the development of passive recreation facilities at a 9.4-acre park site along Goldsborough Creek. Project would include passive recreation amenities, primarily parking, restroom, trails, and passive recreation along the creek, park benches and picnic areas. [Note] Property not acquired as of 2009. Acquisition costs with RCO

Grant are in an "alternate" position now. Can only be acquired with RCO grant.

Justifications: Project listed as a priority in the 2008 County Regional Trails Plan and would also provide additional parkland in the western section of Mason County, which was listed in the

2006 Park Plan as an area of the County with a park and open space deficiency.

Planning and

Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

2010 sttma e rojec

OS S

2011 2012 2013

30,000

320,000

350,000

175,000

175,000

350,000

2014 2015

Total

30,000

320,000

350,000

175,000

175,000

350,000

01.04.10

V/-52

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks

&

Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.000 594.76.63.0100

Foothills County Park

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: Project scope would include working with the Port of Hoodsport to develop a

Master Site Plan for Foothills County Park. Future development of the park via a partnership with the County and Port of Hoodsport would be likely.

Justifications: Project listed in the 2006 County Parks Plan.

2010 s 1ma e roJec

OS S

2011 2012 2013

Planning and

Desiqn

Site Prep &

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

2014

20,000

20,000

20,000

20,000

2015 Total

20,000

20,000

20,000

20,000

V/-53

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 2 Capital Improvement Program

351.000.100 594.76.63.0001

Project Name:

Estimates:

Park Development Partnership Program

Construction Level

Description: The Park Development Partnership Program provides matching grant funds to plan, construct, reconstruct, repair, rehabilitate and improve parks in Mason County. To be eligible for funding, community organizations and public entities must have an established a partnership. Public entities include, but necessarily be limited to: school districts, utility districts and cities. The public entity must submit the application.

Justifications: Provides funds to improve parks in Mason County by promoting partnerships with community groups and public entities. Program would provide for one $50,000 project from

2010 to 2015.

2010 s 1ma e rojec

OS S

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Preliminary

Engineering

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

50,000

150,000

150,000

150,000

150,000

01.04.10

V/-54

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

Project Name:

Estimates:

Description:.

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 1 Capital Improvement Program

350.000.000

Trails Development Program

Construction Level

Trail development program for Mason County.

Justifications:.

Begin Implementation of a trail development program as per the County

Regional Trails Plan.

Estimate roject c t

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Total

2010

Planning and

Design

Site Prep &

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

75,000

200,000

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

100,000

100,000

Total Funding:

200,000

75,000

400,000

300,000

200,000

100,000

100,000 100,000

100,000

300,000

200,000

100,000

100,000

400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000

150,000

1,200,000

400,000

800,000

1,200,000

Trails 2010-2015 Program of Work

1) North Bay Trail

2)

Kennedy Creek Trail Extension

3) Mason Lake to Twanoh State Park

4)

Menards Landing to Rendsland Park

01.04.10

V/-55

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks & Trails Department

REET 1 Capital Improvement Program

350.000.000

MCRA Office Renovation Project Name:

Estimates: Construction Level

Description:

Convert old maintenance garage to a ground level office building.

Justifications:

Current parks office is

25+ years old and can only be accessed up a flight of stairs. Current office is not ADA accessible.

2010

Acquisition

Site Prep &

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

In House

200,000

Total Costs: 200,000

Funding Sources:

200,000

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: 200,000 s 1ma e roJec

OS S

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

200,000

200,000

200,000

200,000

V/-56

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

Fund Name:

Fund Number:

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Parks

&

Trails Department

REET 1 Capital Improvement Program

350.000.000

Project Name:

Estimates:

Goldsborough Creek Park Acquisition

Construction Level

Description: Acquire 9.4 acres on Goldsborough Creek in partnership with the Capitol Land

Trust.

Justifications: High priority for acquisition for use as trailhead site and County Park. High priority in both the Regional Trails Plan and the County Park Plan.

2010

Acquisition

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: s 1ma e roJec

OS S

2011 2012

2013

555,000

555,000

75,000

480,000

480,000

2014

2015

Total

555,000

555,000

75,000

480,000

555,000

**

County contribution would be proceeds from a land sale at Mason Lake.

VI-57

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Vl.6 COUNTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS

System Description

Mason County owns several buildings, most of which are located in the City of Shelton, the

County seat. These buildings are used to support general County functions such as internal management, health, public service, and general administration. Other buildings owned by the

County include Memorial Hall, the Cooperative Extension Office, the two buildings on Pine

Street, the Mason County Fair/Convention Center, the Public Works Campus and the Belfair

Public Works Shop.

TABLE

Vl.6-1 describes these sites. Locations of the facilities within the

Shelton Campus are shown in

FIGURE

Vl.6-1.

Memorial Hall and the two buildings on Pine Street are located in Shelton, a few blocks from the main campus area. The Mason County Extension Office is located about 3 miles north of

Shelton, on the northeast side of Highway 101, across from the Shelton airport. The Public

Works campus is located about 4 miles north of Shelton, on the northwest side of Highway 101.

The Belfair Public Works Shop is situated on the north shore of Hood Canal about 3 miles from

Belfair.

Inventory

Mason County's administrative offices and departments housed in the buildings are listed in

TABLE

Vl.6-2. Also provided is a summary of current office area allocations for the County departments and departmental functions.

Most of the County's administrative offices are located in the Shelton Campus, a four-square block section of the downtown area. At this location, the County operates from 23 publicly owned buildings. These include the Courthouse, Jail, Juvenile Detention Facility, Building I,

Building II, Building Ill, Building IV, Building V, Building VI, Building VII, Building VIII, and

Building IX. Other county administrative offices are located at Building XI (Cooperative

Extension Building), the 3rd

&

Pine building (the Sheriff Office), the Public Works campus, and the offices at the Mason County Fairgrounds.

Facility Needs

Facility needs are being developed through a space planning effort currently being updated by the County. This work is based on an assessment of agency needs related to growth in both the six- and 20-year planning horizons. While planning is continuing, the county has identified the space needs for County administration, law enforcement, and criminal justice facilities. Specific planned improvements for the first six-year planning period and associated financing are detailed in Section V1.1 0, Finance Plan. Based on the "Space Standards Manual" published by the State of Washington Department of General Administration, 251 square feet are needed per employee. In addition, certain governmental functions have special requirements for facilities.

Currently the county has a deficit in space. Significant additional space will be required over the next six and twenty years if the county is to offset that deficit and meet the future growth. The information is summarized in Table V1.6-3. Needs analysis and facility planning was done in

1995 and 1996. The background information and analysis can be found in "Update to Mason

County Space Needs Analysis for inclusion in the Mason County and Master Plan update, June

16, 1999."

01.04.10

V/-58

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

TABLE V.G-1 Summary of Administration Sites

Site

Shelton Campus

Square Feet

169,200

Memorial Hall

Extension Office

Fairgrounds

Belfair Public Works Shop

Public Works Campus

3ra & Pine Property

12,000

Approx. 18,600

Not reviewed

Approx. 61,000

19,000

Acres

3.88

0.275

43

1.4

1.16

Capital Facilities

TABLE V/.6-2. Buildinas and Space Allocations for Administrative Offices

Department or Office

Assessor

Auditor

Area

(square feet)

2,525

3,228

Building I

Building

Buildings I, XI, Courthouse

Central Operations

Clerk

Community Development

Cooperative Extension

Office

Coroner

County Commission

District Court

Equipment, Rental and

Revolving Fund (ER&R)

Facilities & Grounds

Health Services

Permit Assistance Center

Probation Services

Prosecutor

Public Works Campus

Public Works -

Maintenance

Sheriff

99

1430

2,121

2,377

99

1,508

2,322

374

757

3,299

1,726

1,383

3,535

61,000

13,000

Building I, VII

Courthouse

Buildings I, Ill

Extension Office

Building VI

Building I

Courthouse, Building VIII

Buildings I, IX, Ill, Public Works

Campus

Building IX, Courthouse, 3ra &

Pine

Buildings II, Ill, IV

Building Ill

BuildingVIII

Building VII

Public Works Campus

Belfair Shop

Superior Court

Treasurer

4,371

2,157

3rd & Pine Property, Belfair Sub-

Station

Courthouse, Building VI

Building I, Courthouse

01.04.10

V/-59

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

2007 Space Needs Update -Area Projections for primary space needs

Summary Sheet for departments not included in new Mason County Shop facility

Department Current

Allocat 2007 Deficit Deficit ion need (s.f.)

(%)

(s.f.) (s.f.)

I Projected

2012 need

(s.f.)

2017 need

(s.f.)

Assessor 2,519 4,440

1,921

Auditor

Treasurer

Budget and Finance I

Risk Management

Human Resources

Facilities and

Grounds

Board of County

Commissioners I

Central Operations

Clerk

District Court

Superior Court

Probation Services

Juvenile Detention I

Alternatives to

Detention

Sheriff

Adult Detention I

Alternatives to

Detention

Prosecutor

3,407

2,481

210

215

7,096

1,640

1,277

2,925

5,090

4,745

3,408

4,074

2,442

444

444

3,500

3,508

7,664

12,400

4,608

9,400

667

-39

234

229

-3,590

2,231

4,739

7,310

-137

5,992

7,239 16,000 8,761

19,315 55,000 35,685

3,533

3,398

4,468

1,758

935

52%

0%

52%

55%

65%

21%

64%

62%

59%

0%

64%

43%

16%

0%

53%

4,218 4,440

4,296

4,518

1,998 1,998

666 666

666 666

5,500 6,500

3,620 4,892

4,618

5,728

8,774 13,162

16,600 21,200

5,052 5,496

12,200 15,000

18,000 20,000

61,000 67,600

4,690

5,406

01.04.10

V/-60

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Coroner

Community

Development -

Planning

Community

Development -

Permit Assistance

Center

Community

Development -

Utilities and

Waste Management

Public Health

Services

Parks and Trails

WSU MC Extension

Total

294

3,681

635

1,695

744

5,550

1,554

8,992

450

1,998 3,552 1,554

1,869

919

7,297

61%

44%

34%

59%

81%

1,094 1,554 460

2,311 4,330 2,019

I I

+/- 76.80 158,06

+I-

6 81,258

30%

47%

I

+/-51%

Capital Facilities

966 2,188

3,996 4,440

6,216

2,664

7,104

3,330

11,656 14,098

1,776 1,998

I

4,774 5,218

I

183,94 215,64

6

8

V/-61

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

VI.

7

POLICE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FACILITIES

System Description

The Mason County Sheriff's Office provides police services including, patrol, traffic enforcement, service of civil process, jail operation and investigative services to the citizens in unincorporated

Mason County. The Mason County Sheriff's Office currently has a total of 98 employees. Of those, 47 are commissioned officers, 30 are jailers, and 21 are civilian employees.

The Mason County Sheriff's Office currently serves 53,100 citizens covering an area of 961 square miles. The Mason County Sheriff's Office also covers over 900 miles of shorelines, 622 miles of county roads and nearly 115 miles of state highways.

The Mason County Sheriff's Office will be taking over primary responsibility for traffic law enforcement and collision investigations on all county roads commencing July 1, 2009.

Accordingly the Sheriff's Office received authorization for 2 new positions to be dedicated to traffic enforcement on January 1, 2008 and two more on July 1, 2008, providing for a total of 5 officers and a supervisor working traffic and investigating collisions.

Criminal Activity

The following table illustrates calls for service for the Mason County Sheriff's Office 2004 through 2007.

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

19046

22177

20013

20052

19272

The following TABLE V1.7-1 illustrates Mason County Crimes from 2003 through 2007. Figures for 2009 not yet available at the time of this update.

V/-62

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Murder

Forcible rape

By force

Attempted

Robbery

•·Firearm

Knife

. Other weapon

Strong arm

•·Assault

Firearm

Knife

•otherweapon

3 1

Simple assaults

.Burglary r.Forced entry

No force

Attempted

. Larceny-theft

· Vehicle theft

Autos

Trucks, buses

.Other vehicles

Total

Unfounded

Cleared

TABLE Vl.7-1. Mason County Crime 2003 through 2007

2003 2004 2005

6

26

20

6

11

5

380

676

297

351

28

1,071

3

461

13

8

45

0

3

8

2

2

46

42

4

244

149

39

56

2,508

197

230

15

34

354

646

297

418

6

2

1

5

14

9

2

2

32

27

306

43

1,006

219

124

31

64

2,337

196

221

489

47

1,323

296

173

45

78

3,019

246

208

6

35

350

945

409

412

9

3

2

2006

7

405

2

8

30

340

656

297

332

27

1,150

256

153

38

65

2,509

229

226

26

24

2

15

7

0

288

26

1090

243

164

30

49

2391

191

273

5

419

12

9

47

324

593

279

2007

0

31

27

4

13

6

Capital Facilities

01.04.10

V/-63

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Traffic in Mason County

2007 Traffic Infractions issued by MCSO

Criminal Non Traffic issued by MCSO

Total Traffic Collisions responded to by MCSO

Total Traffic Collisions investigated by MCSO

827

373

710

215

Capital Facilities

Washington State Patrol (WSP) maintains records for all citations and collisions within Mason

County. The Washington State Patrol has notified Sheriff Casey Salisbury that they will no longer investigate non-injury collisions on County Roads starting July 1, 2009.

According to a Sheriffs Office analysis, the county for the county to take over the traffic accident investigations on county roads with the associated enforcement component, at least four deputies will be required. The Washington State Patrol currently has nine troopers assigned to Mason County.

Approximately 40 percent of all of the collisions in the county occur on county roads. Additionally, according to WSP statistics, they have been conducting about 4000 contacts per year with nine troopers on county roads, which accounts for about 40 percent of the total WSP contacts in the entire county. This amount of contacts along with the collisions investigated takes up over 40 percent of

WSP'stime.

In 2006, there were 1,035 collisions in all of Mason County. Of those collisions, 383 resulted in personal injuries. There were 15 fatalities with 5 of those fatalities occurring on County Roads. A total of 307 collisions occurred on County Roads. From January 1, 2007 to June 15, 2007, WSP has responded to a total of 1 02 collisions on County Roads. Between 1993 and 2003 Mason County had the 4th highest Drinking Driver Involved (DOl) death rate in the state. During the same time period

Mason County had the 6th highest traffic fatality rate in the state.

Jail Facilities

The Mason County Jail opened in 1986 with a population capacity of 45 inmates. In 1989, capacity was increased to 51, and in 1991 it was increased to 58 beds with floor space for 106.

In 1993 the average daily population (ADP) was 62. In 2004 the ADP was at 95- 146% over capacity.

The Direct Supervision Unit (DSU) opened on October 1, 2006, bringing the jail capacity up to

128 inmates. ADP for 2005 was 111, ADP for 2006 was 119 and ADP for 2007 was 113. 7.

Strategic Plan

The Mason County Sheriff's Office has no current formalized strategic plan at this time; however, the creation of a formal strategic plan is currently being considered.

Alternate Funding Sources

The Mason County Sheriff's Office continues to explore alternative funding sources including

Federal Homeland Security Grants, Justice Assistance Grants, and grants from other federal, state, and private sources. Additionally the Mason County Sheriff's Office is committed to forming community partnerships with public and private agencies to more efficiently provide services and utilize facilities to maximum efficiency.

01.04.10

V/-64

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Overall Facility Needs

In 2008, Foster and Williams conducted a space analysis to be incorporated in the Mason

County Comprehensive Plan. According to this analysis, the Sheriff's Office will have a space deficit of 10,761 by 2012. However, not reflected in that analysis is the County's acquisition of a building located at

3rd

& Pine in Shelton. It is anticipated that the Sheriff's Office will moving from its current location into the

3rd

& Pine building alleviating many of the department's spacing needs.

Space Allocation Criteria

Standard space allocations methods do not apply to all areas of the Sheriffs Office because of the diverse functions found within the department such as training, locker rooms, K-9 holding, briefing room, interview rooms, public receptions, fingerprinting, criminal complaints, evidence processing and others. Space for many of the above mission essential functions does not exist.

Please note that full time work stations are not required for each patrolman. However, four to six work stations for patrol are currently required.

Storage Needs

The most important need of the Sheriffs Office is that of evidence storage. Property taken in by the Sheriff's Office, whether it's contraband, found property, stolen property, or safekeeping is held in trust by the Sheriff's Office. Therefore the Sheriff is responsible for its security, preservation, chain of custody as well as its return, sale or disposal in the same condition it was when we acquired it according to law. Currently evidence is stored in a vault in the basement of the courthouse, on the third floor of the courthouse and in buildings and containers at the impound yard at the county shop. Space allotted for evidence storage space is currently 2908 square feet. It is estimated Sheriff's Office evidence storage should be about 6000 square feet.

This would allow for enough space to properly store and process evidence and should take care of evidence storage needs for at least the next 1 0 years. That space needs to include an 800 square ft space that is heated and well lit for indoor vehicle processing. The evidence storage facility ideally would be all in one location to eliminate the need for transportation to remote locations for storage.

Additionally the Mason County Sheriff's Office must have covered storage for it's three boats, two personal watercrafts, light armored vehicle, ATV, skid car and trailer along with spare vehicles. Additional secure storage is needed for other training equipment, tactical equipment and ordinance that is not routinely issued to officers and needs to be in a secure location.

Storage needs will continue to be revisited and it is anticipated that the Sheriff's Office move to the

3rd

& Pine will address many of them.

Courts

The Mason County District courts handled 11,195 cases in 2004, mostly infractions and misdemeanors. Domestic violence and civil cases make up less than 13 percent of the District

Court caseload. Mason County Superior Court handled 2,541 cases in 2004, with civil cases being the most common, followed by criminal actions, domestic cases, juvenile offender cases, and probate/guardianship cases, in that order.

TABLE

Vl.7-2 summarizes the caseload for the two courts for the years 2002, 2003, and 2004.

01.04.10

V/-65

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

I

TABLE

Vl.7-2 Mason County Court Cases

Case Type 2002

Mason County District Court

Infractions

Misdemeanors

Domestic violence

Civil cases

Total

Mason County Superior Court

Criminal actions

Civil actions

Domestic

Probate/guardianship

Juvenile offender

Total

4,213

2,278

296

1,011

7,798

503

1,020

322

212

261

2,318

2003

5,591

2,980

293

1,139

10,003

475

1,146

337

185

214

2,357

2004

6,574

3,192

258

1,171

11 '195

531

1,199

368

192

251

2,541

Source: State of Washmgton; Courts of L1m1ted Junsd1ct1on Annual Case load Report

Facility Needs

I

In 1996, the Facilities Steering Committee and the Criminal Justice Working Team, working with a consultant, assessed future County building needs. A report was issued jointly by the

Facilities Steering Committee and Criminal Justice Working Team in 1996, and updated in 1999

("Mason County Space Needs Analysis for inclusion in the Mason County Master Plan update,

June 16, 1999") which identified four capital facility projects. Space needs are not determined by a simple set of standards but by a comprehensive approach to the criminal justice systems program needs. The projected cost of this plan and potential funding sources are incorporated in the finance plan contained in Section Vl-1 0 of this chapter. A summary of space needs for the next six-year and 20-year planning periods can be located on Table Vl.6-3, in the previous section V1.6.

V/-66

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

V/.8 STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT

System Description

Existing stormwater facilities in Mason County include both natural systems and built collection and conveyance. Existing systems generally handle runoff from State and County Roads and existing development. Run-off control is limited to new construction which is managed through requirements in 1992 Ecology Stormwater Manual. More stringent control is proposed for the

Urban Growth areas and the Hoodsport Rural Activity Center by implementing the 2005 Ecology

Stormwater Manual and Low-Impact Development techniques.

Increases in the amount of residential and commercial impervious surfaces have increased stormwater runoff in the county. In addition, forestry practices, such as logging, and new road construction, have also increase runoff and created sedimentation problems in a.number of the county's creeks and streams resulting in diminished water quality and loss of critical aquatic habitat. Stormwater runoff, erosion, sedimentation, habitat loss and flooding problems will likely continue in the County especially in the designated urban growth areas if strong control measures are not implanted.

Inventory

Mason County has adopted a Stormwater Management Ordinance (Mason County Code

Section 14.48). This ordinance adopts by reference the 1992 edition of the Washington State

Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual, with the exception of the Minimum

Requirements chapter, for use in designing best management practices (BMPs) for new development and other improvements. The ordinance defines specific minimum requirements and other approval standards for development on all ranges of parcel sizes

The City of Shelton has prepared a Surface Water Drainage Utility Master Plan. Their master plan identifies existing problems in the city and offers recommendations for improvements. The city has scheduled improvements based on the existing master plan; the city intends to update the plan before 2013.

The county is in the process of adopting stormwater plans for the Belfair/Allyn Urban Growth

Area, and the Hoodsport Rural Activity Center. A more general plan for the entire county is expected to be developed in 2009. The specific plans and the more general countywide plan will set the stage for the development of a utility that will implement programmatic and capital improvement projects to manage strormwater. Activities will focus on addressing flooding in the county, improving the water quality in South Puget Sound and protecting critical aquatic habitat.

Strormwater programs and capital improvements will be lunched through direct developer contributions as new development occurs; grants and loans; a dedicated portion of the Real

Estate Excise Tax (REET 2) collected by the county; and utility fees.

Facility Needs

Mason County continues the development of a comprehensive countywide Stormwater

Management Plan. This planning process focuses on a review of existing stormwater policies and the County's stormwater regulations. In addition, a review for regulatory consistency with

01.04.10

V/-67

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010)

Capital Facilities the County's Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) and Low Impact Development (LID) Standards will be completed. The plan addresses changing state, federal, and regional regulatory requirements. This includes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)

Phase II permit program of the Clean Water Act. This act controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the state. Also, the plan will consider implementation of the 2005-2007 Puget Sound Conservation Plan as well as consider the adoption of the Department of Ecology (DOE) 2005 Stormwater Design Manual for Western

Washington in areas of the County beyond the designated Urban Growth Areas. The plan will address evolving water quality needs affecting Hood Canal and South Puget Sound. Also the plan will delineate program objectives and capital facility needs and identify funding sources to implement required action elements.

The County will begin community environmental education and training activities in the Belfair,

Allyn, Shelton and Hoodsport areas. This program will expand to other areas of sensitive water quality in 2009

I

2010 and continuing throughout the county in later years.

The identification of capital projects to address both regional strormwater problems and the need to retrofit existing development will complete during the planning process. Strormwater planning in the urban growth areas and water quality monitoring by the County's Environmental

Health Section have identified needed capital projects. These projects will be address from revenues secured from grants provided by the state. Revenues generated by the utility will fund future capital facilities.

Flooding problems in the Skokomish River watershed have been addressed in a

Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan. This plan defines a total program of river maintenance activities, valley creek maintenance measures, flood protection measures, and flood warning and emergency response procedures.

Mason County adopted the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance in August of 2008.

V/-68

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Public Works

Fund:

Project Name:

Storm Drainage System Development Fund

Storm Water Facilities Development

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Development Level

Description:

Upgrading and construction of storm water facilities around the County will provide treatment and proper control of storm water, reducing the risk of property damage and contamination in our waterways. In support of the new Storm Drainage Ordinances, Mason

County will continue community education and training in the Belfair, Allyn, Shelton and

Hoodsport areas. This program will expand to other areas of sensitive water quality continuing throughout the county in later years. The current Stormwater Management Plans for Allyn,

Belfair and Hoodsport were adopted in 2007/2008. The Countywide Mason County Program was adopted in 2009. The County will continue to expand the areas covered by the Storm Water

Utility until all County areas are adopted.

Justifications:

The criteria for development of storm water facilities will be driven by the population and identified contamination of each area. The State of Washington has identified several areas within Mason County where contamination is affecting the water quality of our bays and lakes.

2010

Project

Management

22,000

Program Design 210,500

&

Implementation

Storm Water

Project Design &

Construction

375,000

Total Cost: 607,500

Funding

Sources:

In House- REET 82,500

Utility

Revenues

25,000

Grants

500,000

Total Funding: 607,500

Estimated Project Costs

2011 2012 2013

8,000

165,500

197,500 218,500 228,500 228,500 328,500 1,576,500

371,000

55,000

69,500

343,000

82,500

25,000

82,500

200,000

250,000 50,000

357,500 332,500

55,000

78,500

2014

55,000

78,500

2015

55,000

78,500

Total

250,000

681,000

362,000

362,000 462,000

2,507,500

20,000

300,000

20,000

20,000

307,500

300,000

400,000

1,250,000

50,000 50,000 50,000 950,000

370,000 370,000 470,000 2,507,500

01.04.10

V/-69

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

GRANT DETAIL

$ 500,000 New 1 Million$ grant

$250,000 New 1 million$ grant

** Equals= $ 750,000 New 1 million$ grant

Project #93

$50,000 - Unknown source at this time.

$50,000 - Unknown source at this time

$50,000 - Unknown source at this time.

$50,000 - Unknown source at this time.

Capital Facilities

V/-70

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet

Utilities, & Waste Management

Fund: Stormwater Utility

Project Name: Critical Habitat Rehabilitation

Capital Facilities

Estimates: Planning

Description: preservation and enhancement of critical aquatic habitat including purchase of land or land conservation easement.

Justification: The loss of critical aquatic habitat can be attributed to poor stormwater management. Improvements to and enhancement of aquatic habitat along county creeks, streams, and in Puget Sound estuaries and shorelines will increase fish and shellfish populations.

Prelim Engineering

Estimated Project Costs(in thousands)

2010 2011 2012 2013

5 5 5 7.5

2014

7.5

2015

10

TOTAL

40

Environmental

Engineering Design

5 5 5 10.5 2.5 2.5 30.5

56.5 56.5 56.5 169.5 Construction/including accruing critical land

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants/Loans

Developer contributions

Rates

Real estate Excise

Tax (REET)

TOTAL FUNDING:

10

5

5

10

10

5

5

10

10

5

5

10

74.5

64.5

10

74.5

66.5

10

46.5

10

66.5

69

15

51.5

12.5

69

240

40

162.5

37.5

240

V/-71

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Vl.9 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES

Introduction

Mason County Public Works is responsible for engineering, construction, operation and maintenance of approximately 640-miles of county roads. Currently staff are housed on the

Shelton campus, the Central Shop on Johns Prairie Road and the Belfair Shop.

Building 8, located on the Shelton campus, includes administrative services, accounting services, environmental services, engineering and construction services and geographic information services. The Information Services Section of Equipment Rental & Revolving Fund

(ER&R) is located a block away in Building 9. Road Maintenance and the Vehicle Maintenance

Section of ER&R share the Central Shop facility located on Johns Prairie Road approximately 3miles north of Shelton. A small maintenance crew is located at the satellite shop in Belfair to service roads in North Mason County.

Public Works has outgrown the Shelton campus facilities. The buildings located at the central shop are over 50-years old, overcrowded and inefficient. The vehicle maintenance shop lacks several modern amenities like insulation, women's restroom and building ventilation systems. A lack of sufficient storage facilities results in expensive road maintenance equipment being stored outside in the elements.

As a result, Public Works proposes to develop a master plan and construct a multi-use facility to house the entire department. This will result in better communication and coordination of the various sections in the department. A shared multi-use facility will provide more efficient use of space and county resources. The Belfair Shop, however, will continue to operate as a satellite facility.

Financing the planned multi-use facility requires the use of grants, loans, and county road funds.

Project costs shown range in accuracy from + or- 40% to + or- 15%. Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy of the estimated costs shown, based on the following scale:

• "Planning Level" -The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of + or- 40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time.

• "Design Report"- Moderate accuracy, in the range of+ or- 30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs.

• "Engineer's Estimate"- Most accurate estimate, in the range of+ or -15%. These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of design work.

01.04.10

Vl-72

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

Fund:

Project Name:

2010-2015 Facilities Plan Worksheet- Public Works

County Road Fund and Equipment Rental & Revolving Fund

New Belfair Shop

Estimates: Planning Level

Description. The Shop will include a work staging area, vehicle maintenance bay, crews lunch/meeting room, restrooms

& shower facilities, offices, vehicle and equipment storage and materials storage.

Justifications: The current Belfair Shop is functionally obsolete, it is located in a residential neighborhood adjacent to Hood Canal and does not have it's own water source. The Shop is hooked up to the neighbor's well. Concerns have been expressed about the proximity of the material storage to the Canal. The site is woefully inadequate for the road maintenance services being provided to the north end of the County. The land trade for the North Mason School

District's Sand Hill property was concluded in March of 2009, so there will be no capital outlay for the land and the shop will be in a much more appropriate location.

2010

Ef t d P . tC t

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Preliminary

Engineering

Site Preparation

Utility Install

Well Drilling

Construction

Engineering

Construction

8,000

25,000

25,000

20,000

6,000

230,000

8,000

25,000

25,000

20,000

6,000

230,000

Total Cost:

314,000 314,000

Funding

Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

314,000

314,000

314,000

314,000

01.04.10

V/-73

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

2010-2015 Facilities Plan Worksheet- Public Works

Capital Facilities

Fund:

Project Name:

County Road Fund and Equipment Rental

Satellite Maintenance Yard Development

&

Revolving Fund

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: Public Works will be developing selected sites at various locations across the

County to better serve the requirements of maintenance activities such as: clearing and grading, installing wells and water systems, installing electric power to support site services, constructing equipment/materials storage buildings and facilities, paving storage sites and developing roads on the properties. Acquisition of individual properties will supplement existing property holdings to provide for uses such as sites for stormwater treatment facilities and disposal sites for ditch spoils and slide materials from maintenance or construction excavations.

Justifications: The changing mandates and requirements of road maintenance necessitate the expansion I upgrade of certain facilities, while the need to develop stormwater detention facilities and ditch spoil disposal sites require the purchase of property in specific locations.

2010 2011

t d P .

ec

t

C

OS ts

2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Preliminary

Engineering

Well Drilling

Permits

& Utilities

Property

Acquisition

Construction

Engineering

10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000

20,000 20,000 30,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 150,000

20,000 20,000 30,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 150,000

50,000 50,000 70,000 50,000 70,000 70,000 360,000

Construction

Total Cost:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000

20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000

50,000 50,000 70,000 50,000 70,000 70,000 360,000

01.04.10

V/-74

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

2010-1015 Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet- Public Works

Fund:

Project Name:

County Road Fund and Equipment Rental

& Revolving Fund

Pole Barn Structure at Shelton-Matlock Road Site

Preliminary

Engineering

Site Prep &

Utilities

Construction

Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding

Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Estimates: Planning Level

Description:

The County Road Fund owns property on Shelton-Matlock Road that is currently used as a fenced materials and equipment storage yard. The construction of a Pole Barn type

Structure on this site will help to facilitate the efficient deployment of crews and equipment to the south end of the County, particularly during snow and ice conditions. The price below reflects a fully enclosed metal structure.

Justifications:

Currently crews assigned to maintain, plow and de-ice the south portion of the

County must go to the Central Shop to get the equipment needed to respond. When doing scheduled maintenance in the south end, the crews end up using valuable working time traveling to and from the Central Shop transporting heavy equipment, vehicles, tools and materials needed for their work. One of the Public Work's long range goals is the placement of satellite maintenance yards in several locations in the county to improve response and efficiency.

Estimated Project Costs

2010 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012

7,500 7,500

10,000 10,000

1,000 1,000

57,500 57,500

76,000 76,000

Total

15,000

20,000

2,000

115,000

152,000

76,000 76,000

76,000 76,000

152,000

152,000

01.04.10

V/-75

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

VI. 10 FINANCE PLAN

Introduction

This section discusses Mason County capital facilities needs and related funding sources. As required under the Growth Management Act (GMA) a six-year finance plan has been prepared for the years 2010 to at least the year 2015 for those facilities currently, or to be, owned and operated by the County.

The following facilities are included in the financial planning:

Water and Wastewater Systems

}>

Belfair Sewer 20 Year Finance and Rate Forecast (Appendix A)

}>

Cost Calculations for Build Out (Appendix B)

}>

Real Estate Excise Tax 1 (REET1 ), REET 2, and .09 Sales Tax Revenues.

(Appendix C)

Solid Waste Management Facilities

County Administrative and Law Enforcement Buildings

Public Works Facilities

Parks and Recreation

Only County owned and operated facilities, except for the community-based wastewater systems for rural activity centers, are included in the finance analysis. Several alternatives have been suggested to deal with the problem of providing water and wastewater service in areas outside the existing utility service area in which growth is forecast. The service area for the solid waste utility is county-wide.

The finance plan identifies reasonably reliable funding sources, and forecasts revenue and expenses to at least the year 2015. Funding varies depending on the facility. The different financing methods, public or private, could have significant implications on the cost of utility service. Potential funding sources that could be used to fund unanticipated needs and shortfalls are also discussed.

Financial Impact Overview

The financial impact for capital facility improvements have been analyzed for the six year planning period. Information on transportation can be found in the Transportation Chapter. A summary of the six year improvement costs, revenues and financing is listed in Table 10-1. The

Table displays the cost by capital facility category. The total of improvement costs and expenditures is

01.04.10

Vl-76

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 -(updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

TABLE

10-1

COUNTY OWNED AND OPERATED CAPITAL FACILITY

IMPROVEMENT

&

FINANCE COSTS

YEARS

2010-2015

(IN THE THOUSANDS)

Capital Facility Category

Water

& Wastewater Systems

Solid Waste Management

Stormwater Facilities

Public Works Facilities

Parks & Recreation

Capital Facilities

Improvement

Costs

43,744

Expenditures

43,744

Finance/Revenues

43,744

1,310

2,748

1,310

2,748

1,310

2,748

826

10,698

826

10,698

826

10,698

Total 59,326 59,326 59,326

V/-77

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August. 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Water and Wastewater Systems

The County owns and operates water utilities in the Belfair and Rustlewood areas. The County also operates water treatment facilities for Rustlewood and Beard's Cove. There is no expected expansion in any of the service utility areas with the exception for the Belfair sewer. A 20 year plan has been developed for sewer expansion to serve the entire Belfair Urban Growth Area. A financial plan and rate structure has been developed to accommodate this growth. The Belfair

Sewer Finance and Rate Forecast, Facility Expansion Map, and Phasing Program Map are incorporated into this Chapter as Appendix A.

Facility worksheets provided in Section Vl.4 summarize the planned water supply and sewer system capital improvements over the next six years.

Solid Waste

Facility Worksheets provided in Section VIA-present revenue sources and expenditure levels for

Mason County solid waste services from 2010-2015.

Municipal Buildings and Law Enforcement Facilities

Any necessary or proposed improvements to municipal buildings and law enforcement facilities are provided in the worksheets in Section Vl-7 for years 2010-2015.

Parks and Recreation

The County has identified over the six year period large number of park and recreation improvements.

The projects include improvements to existing parks and boat. The total cost for these improvements are expected to be approximately $10.6 million (see Section Vl-5).

Stormwater Management

Mason County created a stormwater utility in 2008. The initial emphasis for Stormwater management will be placed on the Belfair/Allyn area. The utility outlines future expansion to other areas of the County with the whole county being included within the boundaries fo the utility by 2013. the County also adopted the 2005 Department of Ecology Stormwater Drainage

Manual and Low Impact Development Standards which will be enforced in the Belfair and Allyn

UGAs first with the entire county being subjected to the requirements as water quality monitoring dictates. The following tables outline expected Capital projects in the stormwater utility in 2010-2015.

01.04.10

V/-78

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

APPENDIX A

MASON COUNTY- BELFAIR SEWERING PROJECT

FINANCIAL AND RATE FORECAST - JULY

8, 2008

Purpose

The purpose of this document is to provide a current financial forecast for the Belfair sewer project, to support the County's efforts to receive GMA approval for the project.

A financial forecast was prepared with the Wastewater Management Plan. Since completion of that document there have been significant changes to financial assumptions including additional service areas, updated capital costs, and additional secured grants.

The County has existing sewer utilities with policies in place to support fiscally and financially prudent operation of those entities. This forecast presents a rate forecast that modifies some of those policy assumptions where it may bring the rate closer to an "affordable" range. Doing so may bring on financial risk, and so two forecast scenarios are presented here: a "conservative" scenario and an "affordability" scenario. In the conservative scenario, the County's current policies continue to be used in the Belfair area. In the affordability scenario, the County uses all policy options to make the rates as affordable as possible in the initial years.

Data Sources and Assumptions

The capital financing analysis uses capital costs, project timing, and capital inflation rate as projected and provided by CH2M Hill. Also provided were existing ERUs and new annual connections, projected O&M costs and estimated timing of capital spending. Each set of data was provided for four different phases including 1. Initial Connection (this is the Core Service area evaluated in the Master Plan), 2. Old Belfair Hwy Connection, 3. New Kirk Road

Connection and 4. Southern Connection.

At the time of the forecast presented in the Master Plan, the County had secured $16 million in grants and $2.4 million in state loans (SRF). The County has since secured a total of $24 million in grants and has $3 million of state loans available.

The forecast period includes 2008 through 2025. However, actual 2007 costs are included in the summary and financing analysis in order to consider total costs and total resources for the project.

V/-79

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Capital Costs

The following table shows the capital costs, both in current dollars as well as inflated at 8% annually to the year of projected spending. Capital costs are scheduled to be complete before the first year of operation for each of the service areas.

Table 1. Capital Cost Data

2007 2008 2009 2010 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 2024 2025

Capital Costs (2008 $)

Initial ConnecUon

Old Belfair Hwy ConnecUon

New Kirk Road ConnecUon

Southem Connection

Total

$780,000 $4,500,000 $12,720,000 $20,000,000 $

. 4,785,000

.

.

.

$

3,785,000

$

1,000,000

$

.

3,298,760

.

$

.

1,592,511

$

1,183.057

$

$780,000 $4,500,000 $12,720,000 $20,000,000 $4,785,000 $3,785,000 $1,000,000 $3,298,760 $1,592,511 $1,183,057 $

Total

$38,000,000

9,570,000

4,891,271

1,183057

$53,644,328

Escalated Capital Costs $780,000 $4,500,000 $13,737,600 $23,328,000 $7,593,194 $6,486,825 $1,850,930 $7,121,775 $3,713,161 $4,053,085 $ $73,164,570

The capital costs for the Initial Connection are projected 2007 through 2010, with year 1 of operation, 2011. This includes treatment plant costs for enough capacity to serve the four identified service areas (at the projected rate of growth), as well as the infrastructure planned to serve the Initial Connection service area.

Capital costs to build infrastructure to connect customers in the Old Belfair Hwy Connection are planned for 2014 through 2016 with first year of operation targeted for 2017.

The New Kirk Road connection is projected to begin service in 2020 with capital spending in the two years preceding, and the Southern Connection in 2025 after infrastructure is built in 2024.

Customer Base

The customer base is defined in Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs), and it is projected to grow at 5% annually. The Sewer Master Plan completed in 2007 forecasted growth at about 9% annually, though, the financial projections in that plan also used the more conservative rate of

5% annually.

The customer base is defined with two types of service connections: existing and new. The analysis distinguishes between developed properties with existing permitted septic systems (as of Jan 1 2008) and new connections since the sewer project has begun.

The following table summarizes the annual ERU projection used in the forecast.

Table 2. ERU and Growth Summary

2011 2012 2013 2014

ERUs

Initial Connection

Old Belfair Hwy Connection

Newkirk Road Connection

Southern Connection

Total

617

0

0

0

617

648

0

0

0

648

681

0

0

681

715

0

0

0

715

2015

751

0

751

2016

788

0

0

0

788

2017

827

210

1,037

2018

869

230

0

0

1,099

2019

912

250

0

0

1,162

2020

958

270

19

0

1,247

2021

1,006

290

49

0

1,345

2022

1,056

310

79

0

1,445

2023

1,109

330

109

0

1,548

2024

1,164

350

139

0

1,653

Operations and Maintenance

Operations and Maintenance costs were provided in current dollars for the first year of operation for each service area. For rate projections, annual O&M costs are escalated at 3% annually.

The rate forecast separately calculates excise taxes on projected rate revenue, which are added

2025

1,223

370

169

21

1,783

OJ. 04.10

V/-80

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) to these O&M costs for rate projection calculations.

Table 3. Operations and Maintenance Projection

Capital Facilities

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Annual O&M

Initial Connection

Old Belfair Hwy Connection

New Kirk Road Connection

Southern Connection

Total

$341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800

97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000

35,890

97,000

35,890

97,000

35,890

97,000

35,890

97,000

35,890

$341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $341,800 $438,800 $438,800 $438,800 $474,690 $474,690 $474,690 $474,690 $474,690

$341,800

97,000

35,890

10 670

$485,360

Escalated Annual O&M

$373,494 $384,699 $396,240 $408,127 $420,371 $432,982 $572,534 $589,711 $607,402 $676,794 $697,098 $718,011 $739,552 $761,738 $802,226

The Initial Connection begins 2011 with $341 ,800 of O&M, escalated from 2008 to $373,494. In year 2025 when the fourth service area begins receiving service, escalated O&M costs total

$802,226.

Capital Facilities Charge- CFC (conversion/connection charges)

Calculation of a connection charge for the Belfair sewering project considers total project costs,

2025 customer base, secured grants toward funding the identified capital costs and reduction of unit costs to customers paying a ULID to fund a portion of their capital costs.

Separate charges are calculated for conversions (existing development) and new development.

In order to distinguish the separate charges, the connection charge for existing development is referred to as a "conversion charge," while the charge for new development continues to be referred to as a "connection charge."

The charges are calculated as three separate components of the total. One reason is so that if a developer chooses to build and finance particular infrastructure ahead of the County doing so, there is a clear dollar amount per ERU of credits that they may receive toward their connection charge, based on the type of project they are building and for how many ERU units. Another is to properly reflect the Old Belfair Hwy Connection ULID contribution and adjust their connection charge accordingly. And finally, it is done to provide an opportunity for existing development (as defined in the ERU section) to benefit from available grants toward reduction of their treatment unit cost.

The total unit cost before adjustments is about $30,000 per ERU (using the number of ERUs projected in 2025).

The ULID-funded projects (in the Old Belfair Hwy Connection service area) are then deducted from the cost total. The ERU basis is also adjusted to recognize ERUs served by the ULIDfunded projects.

The number of ERUs served by the identified treatment costs through 2025 total 1, 783. ERUs served by the trunk and collection costs after removing the Old Belfair Hwy Connection portion total 1 ,413.

Capital Financing

As discussed in the Master Plan, utility formation requires consideration of unique cash flow constraints. An existing utility has an existing revenue stream and some level of cash reserves to support capital financing and debt repayment. In the case of a new utility, capital costs will be

01.04.10

Vl-81

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities incurred preceding a revenue stream from a rate-paying customer base. Even use of grant funds requires approximately 60 days of financing since funds are dispersed on a reimbursement basis. The capital financing analysis developed for this rate projection uses a mix of the County's funding and financing options to complete 2007 through 2010 capital spending preceding connection of customer base.

The capital financing analysis considers use of the lowest cost funding options first and balances the total financing need with those that have a greater rate impact. The financing priority is as follows; 1. Secured grants (CTED), 2. Secured state loans (SRF), 3. Accumulated cash reserves [from CFCs or projected Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) funds] and 4. Revenue bonds.

An exception to this priority list is that the County is planning to fund the Old Belfair Hwy

Connection trunk and collection line costs with a ULID. The County would borrow funds to finance those costs, and they would be repaid through property assessments within the service area boundary.

In order to have funds available to finance the first 60 days of grant use, a combination of SRF and grant use is projected to fund capital costs for each of the four years of capital spending.

Because SRF repayment begins the fiscal year after the first draw, debt service obligations are projected begin ahead of year one of operation and therefore require another County resource for repayment. The County has pledged $200,000 annually of REET monies from the General

Fund beginning in 2009 to help fund the project. These funds allow the County to make SRF payments that are due ahead of the 2011 first year of operation. Without the REET funds, the

County would not be able to utilize all lowest cost financing options first, but rather would need to issue revenue bonds and capitalize the interest for the period preceding utility revenue collection.

Revenue bonds are needed to balance the net financing need after use of all available grants, state loans and any available cash reserves. Revenue bonds not only affect rates through debt repayment obligation, but also carry a security requirement, bond coverage. Bond coverage defines an annual minimum level of revenue the utility must collect. The coverage factor is a factor applied to the utility's revenue bond payment in each year of repayment. It requires revenues be sufficient to make the bond repayment as well as an additional percentage of that amount. For example a bond coverage factor of 1.25 requires that rate revenue (along with any other eligible revenues) be sufficient to fund annual operating and maintenance expenses plus

125% of the revenue bond payment. Coverage will be discussed further with the rate projections.

The following table summarizes planned annual financing of the capital costs for this project.

Table 4. Projected Annual Capital Funding Plan

2007 2008

2009 2010 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 2024 Total

Capital Costs (2008 $)

Projected Capital Funding Need $780,000 $4,500,000 $ 13,737,600 $23,328,000 $7,593,194 $6,486,825 $1,850,930 $7,121,775 $3,713,161 $4,053,085 $73,164,570

ULID-Funded'

Grant-Funded

SRF Loans

Capital Reserves (CFC Rev, etc)

Revenue Bonds

Short-tenn Financing

Total Funding

$

780,000

~-

$780,000

$

3,833,333

666,667

- -

$4,500,000

$

12,270,302

1,467,299

$

7,116,365

899,535

0

11,833,981

3478119

$7,593,194

$13,737,600 $ 23,328,000 $7,593,194

$6,486,825 $1,850,930 $

$ $

$15,930,949

24,000,000

-

3,033,500

1,487,387 1,069,338 4,053,085 6,609,811

-

5,634,388 2,643,823 20,112,192

- - - -

-

- -

3 478 119

$6,486,825 $1,850,930 $7,121,775 $3,713,161 $4,053,085 $73,164,571

'Old Belfair Hwy Connection co//ectionl!runk costs

01.04.10

V/-82

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Capital Facilities

The County is planning on a ULID to finance the Old Belfair Hwy Connection infrastructure costs, planned for 2014 through 2016, totaling $9,570,000 in current dollars and $15,930,949 in projected future dollars. The County would issue debt for the projected $16 million total and repayment would occur through annual assessment revenue collected from the Old Belfair Hwy

Connection properties.

Secured grant funds are used from 2007 through 2010, totaling $24 million. SRF loan proceeds are projected to be spent from 2008 through 2010. The balance of capital financing needed for the Initial Connection period is $15,312,100. This consists of a projected $11.8 million in conventional municipal revenue bonds and $3.5 million of short-term financing.

The purpose of the short-term financing is to allow the County to use CFC revenue from conversions and new connections in 2011 to reduce the rate burden from debt repayment.

Based on results of the connection charge analysis, an expected $4.1 million of CFC revenue is anticipated to be collected in 2011. Of that, $400,000 is planned to support existing annual debt service obligations, leaving $3.7 million available for project costs. Since capital financing is completed before customers connect, it is assumed the County could secure short-term financing for what could be repaid with the net available 2011 CFC revenue. This reduces the debt repayment obligation from rates.

On July 5, 2008, the 2-year municipal bond yield was 2. 75%. Assuming this interest rate and a

0.5% issuance cost, the County could realize debt reduction of $3.5 million by using the $3.7 million of 2011 CFC revenue.

The following table shows a summary of total costs to finance and total resources used.

Table 5. Summary of Capital Financing 2007-2025 -Affordable Scenario

Total Costs Current$

Total Costs Escalated

$ 53,644,328

$73,164,570

Total Grants

Total State Loans

Total ULID

Total CFCs, other reserves

Total Revenue Bonds

$ 24,000,000

3,033,500

15,930,949

7,016,123

23,183,999

$73,164,571

The above capital financing summary represents a rate scenario in which some level of available capital funds are used directly for debt repayment for rate relief, rather than reserved and available for cash-funding capital. The most conservative scenario does not consider capital revenues for debt repayment (with the exception of the short-term financing). They are reserved in the Capital Fund and used to cash-fund future projects, which would reduce the need for future revenue bonds.

The following table shows the capital financing summary for the more conservative forecast, in which capital revenues are not utilized for debt repayment and are reserved in the Capital Fund to cash-fund future projects.

01.04.10

V/-83

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

Table 6. Summary of Capital Financing 2007-2025- Conservative Scenario

Total Costs Current$

Total Costs Escalated

$ 53,644,328

$ 73,164,570

Capital Facilities

Total Grants

Total State Loans

Total ULID

Total CFCs, other reserves

Total Revenue Bonds

$ 24,000,000

3,033,500

15,930,949

15,127,436

15,072,685

$ 73,164,570

The result is that no additional revenue bond borrowing is required after the Initial Connection financing and $15 million ofcapital reserves fund the remainder of projected capital costs (with the exception of the ULID).

Revenue

There are four types of revenue considered to meet annual cash obligations. These include revenue from rates, interest earnings on the operating fund, and use of REET funds and CFC revenue toward debt repayment. In order to provide the greatest level of rate relief, a scenario is provided that uses 100% of REET funds and $400,000 per year of CFC revenue (which represents about 70% of total CFC revenue initially, going to under 20% by 2025) toward annual debt repayment. The conservative alternative is that REET funds are used only for debt repayment that precedes utility operation. In the remainder of the forecast, REET funds are reserved for cash-funding future capital. CFC revenue is also reserved for cash-funding future capital rather than supporting annual debt repayment obligations.

REET funds and CFC revenue are also considered in the coverage calculation. The County's bond counsel has indicated that dedicated REET funds would be an eligible revenue for the coverage calculation and that the County could specifically write them in to a bond covenant as an eligible revenue source. The risk is the potential that the County will not collect sufficient

REET funds to make the full $200,000 support to the utility in a given year. Similarly, due to the variable nature of revenue collection from CFCs, which are also subject to economic conditions, there is risk associated with including CFCs in the coverage calculation as eligible revenue.

Typically, coverage is tested at a higher factor when including CFCs.

The two scenarios vary in coverage calculation in that the conservative scenario tests coverage at a 1.25 factor and excludes REET funds and CFCs as eligible revenues and the scenario that targets affordability includes REET funds and 75% (an element of conservatism within this scenario) of annual CFC revenue, though tests at a higher coverage factor of 1.50

The higher rate revenue need of the total cash and total coverage obligations becomes the basis for setting rates. Coverage is the driving factor in most years before the second service area begins operation. The total rate obligation, divided by the total ERUs in each year results in a monthly unit cost per ERU. Because this amount varies annually and typically trends down with ERU growth, operating reserves are managed to set a single rate for periods within the forecast.

Sewer Connection Zone Characterization

Initial Connection Zone:

01.04.10

V/-84

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

The area consists of scattered residential and the "core" commercial corridor for the Belfair community. A majority of the commercial development is underutilized because of little organized infrastructure, especially sewers. The area is the most problematic for the contribution of pollutants to Hood Canal. The County has secured funds to construct a collection system and a Membrane BioReactor (MBR) treatment facility to serve the area along State

Route # 3 which transverses the length of Belfair. Following the construction and commissioning of the NBR treatment plant all properties within 500 feet of the initial sewers lines will be required to connect to the Belfair sewer system. All on-site expenses incurred for connection will be borne by the property owner. Once connection occurs a monthly utility rate will be collected from each property.

Old Belfair Highway Connection:

The area is a larger urban density residential community north of the Belfair "core" commercial corridor. Many of the owner occupied structures are pre-and early posts World War II stock.

The structures use on-site systems as their method of sewage disposal. Because of older onsite systems, denser development patterns and high ground water tables the area likely contributing nitrates and fecal contamination to the canal. The area is low-to moderate income and financing large sewer improvements will be difficult without Federal and state assistance.

The county will relay on grants and loans and County supported Utility Local Improvement

Districts (ULID) to develop sewers in the area.

Newkirk Road Connection Zone:

The area is divided into two sectors. The area to the north is vacant, larger parcels held by four developers. It is planned and zoned for commercial and industrial development. The area to the south is comprised of vacant properties still in large parcels with a single owner. The land is planned and zoned for higher destiny residential development. There is current demand for the development of the northern area. The development of the sewer collection system to serve the northern area will occur as the MBR plant is developed at developer expense. The southern area will remain in large tracts until near the end of the UGA planning period.

Southern Connection:

The area is the most difficult to develop because of environmental constraints. There is some scattered low-density residential development but most of the land remains in large undeveloped tracts. Portions of the area will be impacted by the development of the Belfair bypass. The properties will remain vacant until the later years of the planning period.

01.04.10

V/-85

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010) Capital Facilities

V/-86

Legend

BcM~rUGA

Ceourn~BouodocJ

~Sir~tl;

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

BELFAIR SEWER SYSTEM

Connection Zones

Map2

Count)' Comminlonuw

Capital Facilities

Ph~J

Develop&I'S

Z017·202.0

If()()/)

CASAl.

0 0.25 0.5

V/-87

legend

~Miles

1

'6c!fairUGA

D()JUllyBo!nlary

~Sireds

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

BELFAIR SEWER SYSTEM

Connection Zones

Map 3

MURRAY SJo'fTli

&

ASSOCIATES

MAP

LEGEND

===

~--·~---=-=

Capital Facilities

U,NP

APPLICATION

stn;

V/-88

0.5

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

BELFAIR SEWER SYSTEM

Connection Zones

Map4

~\

_//-'~-~\

- - - - - - - - - -

County Comm!uioo~rs

Cr<JinancaNum~

Capital Facilities lfOO /)

V/-89

WATER

RECLALIATlON

FACILJTV

(-\

[

I

I

I

/

II

'

LAND

I

APPLICATION

I i

SITE

1

I i

I j f

I

I

I

1

\

'"'--

___

_ /

I

1/ li

I

I

; ,

Legend

o~E!ouOOary

,......__.,Sir~s

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

APPENDIX "8"

Capital Facilities

*these costs are from Facility Plan Supplemental Information Transmission to Belfair Facility

Items of Work and Material

UGA Gravity Sewer Collection System

8" Gravity Sewer Pipe 0-6 Feet Deep

8" Gravity Sewer Pipe 6-9 Feet Deep

8" Gravity Sewer Pipe 9-12 Feet Deep

1 0" Gravity Sewer Pipe 0-6 Feet Deep

15" Gravity Sewer Pipe 9-12 Feet Deep

18" Gravity Sewer Pipe 6-9 Feet Deep

48" STD Precast Manhole

Sanitary Sewer Service Connection

Pump Station

Electrical Service to Pump Station

Pump Station Mechanical Equipment

Wetwell

Chemical Feed/ Electrical Building

Odor Control

Electrical Equipment

Telemetry/SCADA

Generator

Fencing

Site Work and Landscaping

Erosion Control

Valved and Vault

Meter and Vault

Total

6" Forcemain

Grinder Pump

3" Forcemain

48" STD Precast Manhole

RR Crossing

Unit Unit Price Contingency 20%

LF

LF

LF

LF

LF

LF

EA

EA

$85.00

$90.00

$100.00

$120.00

$200.00

$200.00

$5,000.00

$1,200.00

$102.00

$108.00

$120.00

$144.00

$240.00

$240.00

$6,000.00

$1,440.00

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

SF

LS

LS

LS

$10,000.00

$325,000.00

$80,000.00

$150.00

$60,000.00

$150,000.00

$35,000.00

$60,000.00

$5,000.00

$15,000.00

$3,500.00

$40,000.00

$20,000.00

$803,650.00

LF

EA

LF

$50.00

$6,000.00

$35.00

EA

EA

$5,000.00

$25,000.00

$12,000.00

$390,000.00

$96,000.00

$180.00

$72,000.00

$180,000.00

$42,000.00

$72,000.00

$6,000.00

$18,000.00

$4,200.00

$48,000.00

$24,000.00

$964,380.00

$60.00

$7,200.00

$42.00

$6,000.00

01.04.10

V/-90

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) Capital Facilities

Appendix C

V/-91

01.04.10

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0) dilhitiii

~

Revenue~!Resources

Beginning Balance

Rural Coc.mties Sales & Uso Tax lnterestlru::ome

!ntarfuncl Loan Principal Paid from Selfeir

!nterfund Loan Interest Paid from

Belfair

-

Table 10-

Counties·, (;09) Fund Capital tmprovements Plan @·12122109

2010

Pllli!U

=

2011 atlifl! !H#k¥1

2012

(continued}

2013

;--

2014

2015

Revised

'':i7i'[email protected]

~~*;~~its~Z:

867,337 s

938,714 1,796,780 s

1,882,456 $ 1,997,042 s

8,800,369

483,315 507,480.75 532,854.79 559,497.53 587,472.40 $ 3,130,920

15,031.10 15,782.65 16,571.78 17,400.37 18,270.39 $ 97,417

1,318,041

460,300

14,361

$ 1,832,381

800,000 $ 800,000 s

39679 $ 39,679

$ $ $ 79,358 s

1,405,362

$

2,251,977 2,346,207 2,459,353 2,502,785 $12,908,055

Total Reaoun:.os

Expencffturesii.Jses lnterfund Chg fo; Services

Ecortomic Devolopmont COI.Jnci!

C8pltll! lmprovemont Pro}ects:

Oakland Bay Shen:ish Protection Dist

PUD #3 • Lynch Rd Broodband Extension Project

Allyn Pump smtion

Rustlewood Pump Station

Beffair Water District- Relainage Held from 2009 Project

Belfait Wastewater Water Reclamation System

Hoodsport Sewer 8)'3tem

City of Shelton Regiolllll Sewor

Total Planned Expenditures

Total Ending Fund Balance

Totafi.Js.os

2,065 s

34,000

2,168.25

34,000

2,276.66

34,000 $

2.390.50

34,000

2,510.02

34,000 $

2,635.52 $ 14,046

34,000 $ 204,000

$

$ 200,000

$ 144,502 s

100,000

$

42,000

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

200,000

144,502 s

100,000

42,000

10,438

200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000

100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000

132,039

200,000

100,000 s

$ 10,438

200,000 $ 1,200,000 s

100,000 $ 600,000 s

130480

~ 128,920 s

127,361 125,801

$

125,801 $ 770 402

$

$

955,044 $ 455,648 $ 465,197 $

867 337 $ 938 714 $ 1,796,780 $

453,751

$

452,311

$

452,437 $ 3,285,388

1,882.456

$

1,997 042 $ 2,140 349 $

9,622,678

$

1,832,381 $ 1,4(15,362 $ 2,251,977 $ 2,345,207 $ 2,459,353 $ 2,602,785 512,908,065

Mason County agreed to mako :mnuaf payments for 20 yeDl:s to

City of Sholton for Regions/

S~twu-lhls

Is payment

#3

Und« curmnt funding legir;la'llon,

the .09 Sales

Tax Crodit for Rural Counties wl/1 ond in the yer 2023 bGfortt the 20 yo.sr p&riod of paymonts to the City of Shelton

aro

eomplefr!d.. tt will be necessaty to adjU5t expendfturM in future yoars for this

scenario.

There is not

B formal award through the .09 proce.ss for

these

amounts.

Capital Facilities

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 2010)

Capital Facilities

12130/2009

Sheet2

Table 10(c"Ontioued)

REET 1 Capital !mprovement'Program @for 11130/09 2010-2015

-

2010

~.

2011

---··---~---

2012 :

- · - - - -.. --··t·

2013

---~-·-······

~~.!.=.-·-·····-·-

SeslnnlngFundBalanee360-000.000

-~~"!:'====--::~-=~==------

'""'""''>=m«

:-~- -1,572;qi27IT.12(546-~99-,3~4: $

_;_§ .....

:

?~ssr=

23,581

36 1,526:83

56,227'

-

3~,3;'2.6~;

44,959

§7{3!?:5.!

$

.$:f'?.273---rs-268AT1-:-~

. 3§:l:543;s1

33,566 c.

~9~,65cw

25,814

406,9Q!,!l.EC:·2:27o:.39_2 ·-

13,421

$

.

~-~9~4¥?.:

197,580

-

~~~&;~~~;f-~~:~=--:-·----.---------····-·-·· --:·-=~=~:··~ 3]'i.Q[a·--;-~--~~

,

~

·······--···-··_ -: ··-··· ..

--~--:r--~=-=~--

.

~ ---~-~:----~--~-~-~.®.~q?J~-~~-

~rant

-Lntlmen: Landing PoMts S S S

$

$

S S S q;rt~t:t

'fol'J'trlm

~&$&

$

BondProc&ed&3rd&Pll'leProperty

,;;;;,--------- · - -- ,, --,---------------- --- ·

Expenditures/Uses

----··"· a~·cebt·~oo-;;~-;-----­ e·R&Ru;;n-----·-------·---

·---·-btServtce

2008

~-~~~-~-~--~Pi~:.~~-

i $ s

$

"s 93_!.137

'S

[_s_ .

688 )~ :-"s=-~-=3,=35=-

7=,4;,z=if -- - -

··s

---·ws:e62'TT?ri:?s:rh173,1si s·

----:---.-s-~·:··-,-r-s---:,-c-$

:_:_3

------·~··--··'-'-;

- -$

~~i]~}.::~-1 i~]~_Es-11~:~~L

- :i s

2_1~:~i~

+·--··

, s

, s s

.$

s s

3'H1i:1;~ a~~~~--t-

-+-------+--

1 1

S5.0Ss i

$

55,066 : s 55,066·;-s 5S,OOB i--$· ·_s_s,Q5_f_'J.

-=]5,006J.

330,395

·s

3so.ooo ,--s36D,OiiO"'s 3oo.ooo

~r·

3oo.ooo:s 3oo,ooo s 3oo,ooo

$

1.asg,o

·s ·-406,ooo · s s --- : s ·· '!f ______ --- ---------

.

$

,,,..-~$

. $

$ --- ----: $

$ .

$------$--

·------$---

"""'""-$"

$

$

-$ s

$

$

$

$

$ s

$

S 20,000,

1,122.104 ;

----::::::_:-_si1:l24.s46: s

S -

$ s 645 351 s 572,2?_5_,< s·--·s7f3Bs'·s

516,273!

2,~~-6.6~----- ----~ !~3,i6:'11s:s-1;i5s_8;_4t7·

,726 , s 66U48

"'-$-:-:-"20:o;,OOO"""

4.313 o58

---.-:.---26985--s·

122428

.. 4;43s:4Ss· ____ _

.

"N"Ofii.:REET 1 irlcressed 1.0% ea.

yr, iiiterest7iiCOiiie

1.5% x &g-:FU!id-bala-nce r0r-201ti BfKrthen iii 20{1 retum··ta

§~

REEflnC!e$Se8fiCl5%

711fefestTfrcome"Ji-iCiea-se~Tiiteiil.if?CFCh'gi J(iCffl83e~f%

~

1996 GO Bonds

-

--·-·----·-··-··-·--~-----···-···

-

-···--·~·-·

·-·

-

··-·-~~~-

-last bond payment is In 2012- that payment is. In the amount of$173, 167 -In 2013 the 2008 GO Bond payment Increases to $215,011. in 2014 increases to S311,511 and in 2014 decreases to $304,511

·puf2hase··oHowe-rhitfOH3UlidT-·trom

Road Fund is

·s700®---~4:92%-fur20·-ars·excel/caplmprpt/REET 1 copttallmprov0fl"IC!f1t p~n

11130/0G.lds 121"3012009

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated December 8, 2009; January 12, 201 0)

&gymU!S~Rf!fiOtJty!

Beg ~~

Opimrt!ons:

I~I'Mt

(REET 2 Fund)

"""'""

RCO GmrrtM(I:SOI'J L:!mSool.Lnunch

RCO Grar.t l&ltimer's l.tln~g

RCO GmntTrvm!ll"!

~e~o;

RCO Grant MCRA lm?rovementiS

RCO Grart! Oolc:tanc: Bay Dtwolo;lmcr.t

RCO Un~

L3keNahwatze!?a!1t

FooltlilbPar\tM8tclt·Pcrtofl-lclodtlport

514.23.91.0014

54VKl.63JXl10

597.00.00.0010

Total Resoure.s

Exp;[email protected]

Caplb,llmpruv.rnmi:Pro~ctrJ;: interfund

Ct~g for

SYCB!Bl.ldget

O~ardsl.mm

Tftlflsfer OUt to

Coop

& r~.,

597.00.00.0480

O!.rt ~ Sta~ Ora:in~o

Sp;tDI'I'\ DoV F1 ;

Sr~.~:~~-~-:,- '~~=s::~,

57S.SIJ.41.0200

57680 . .41.0400

57e.B0.41.0130

Letimernlandlng?~M;m!.

Ma&or! Lake

PM~

Oakland Boy Pftlf'a2:9l0fllll Sll!"llico:s

MCRA MBinteoance F~l1ty .594.76.62.0310

594.7B 53.0100

59.4.76.63.0200

59-1.7!!.83.0312

594.76.63..0311

594.78.63..0400

594.76.63.0500

594.ffl.63.0510

594.73.63..0500

594.76.53.0700

594.76.63.t:IBOO

594.78.63.0900

!94.76.63.1300

594.73.63.1400

594.76.63.1700

594.76.63.2000

5B4.76.63.0810

594 76.63.1$00

597.00.00.01.<10

~1,;qoo,.."foo

594?6.63.0001 latimDI"I5

Land~

Mason Coomy Roqnatlon A.ren Copitallmprovt $

MCRA.O!Tlce·COO:atrudlon S

County

SarldhiD Cotrty

PB111

Pll~

SQI'ldhil!CcuTtyPa!t;F~eld~i'il!flova">IOn

$

S

$

J8CCby

>'llfl< {Shorecrest)

Truman Glide Memonal ParK

Union Pork

WaBie!'Pmt

O::kland

Bay Pa~

Phillips

Lal<e

Park

H~Rendsl3nc1Pa!1t

Wa!J;<Xl Wildwood P:trl<:

Laktl Nahwatzel Park

Union

Boat laurtdl

Menard's.lan<Mg Par\<;

T~nsfar

Q<.;t To ?.arts CIE ralm capital imP!V

Tr.ansforOul tc Parkslpro)cct managcrnent

~p~~

Pe~rt<!.P~rshiPProjocts

Scwerutllmft.~

1,918,353

28,775.30

350,997

3BO,OOO

54,307

170,000

210,000

52B,SOO s

1.210.736 s

60,537

3151,527

364,000

815.526 $ s.

• s

40,776

372.~73

396,298 $

19,8(5

383,544

562,5CO

24i,"\63 $

12,3.58

19,458

AOS,9>J2

375,000 s

1,479,?:55

163,23-(

2,270.l92

744,000

991,807

$

200,000 200,000 800,000

126,750

126,750

-·----·-

_,

____

.

__

400,000 $ s s s

, ____

.

175.000 175,000

__ ~5,000

____

.

__

375.000

____

.

__

S 2.123,.5-<lS S 1,628,677 S 1,572,156 S 1,04,571

S.

603,500 s

,

____

.

__

410,000

_____

._

1,252,333 S 7,71:2,689 2,85S,iS3

2.0!35

10,0CO

82,500

36,000

40,.529

20,000

244,250

17,000

SO,OOJ

67,603 s

2,168

10,000

82,500

526,500

10,000

123,000

20,00)

'">50

67,603

'

2,277

10,000

62.500

800,000

190,000

10,000

67,603

' •

$

'

$

'

$

'

'

'

' '

'

$

'

2,3>0

10,000

750,000

25,00J so,ooo

67,603

2,010

10,000

20,000

400,000

350,000

<65,000

67,803

2,754

10,00J

200,000

400,000

500,000

67,603

14,154

60,000

247,500 s

'

'

'

'

'

'

:35,000

40.529

20,000

950,000

'

'

1,770,000

2'iO,OC:::l

1,057,000

10,000 '

210.000

123,000

20,000

1.188,500

10.000

17,000

25,000

500,000

515,000

50,000

405,618

RU31tewood

Dump

Slmlorl

20,000

1 CO, 000

20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,00J

Rus!lewoocfWawSys1om~rsqetar.k

;F,.tlftl:ls &GrtJufms TbfrJ:Mfuefum

Sl~.pii~oro.::f.$,

150.000

50'00o

~

Tota!o~REET2Elcpcoditure3

En6ogFundBalanca

S

:;.

1,548,447 $

12107:36 s

1.308,021 S

815:523 $

1.232.380 S 1.324,003 S 1,385,113

TotaiU~

S 2859183

Note:Chgs for Accoul)ling

& Op&ftfrto CIE ~~~

S

.£.12354:9 S

yr. REE.T 3% oe. yr,

1628877

~

irrt incomo .5:% X Beginning Fund Baianre

S

1,250,358 $

$ 1,252.333

$

120,000

100,000

150,000

8,1413,311

9,8:561662

Capital Facilities

Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertisement