CANCELLED UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC )

CANCELLED  UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC )

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC

)

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

CANCELLED

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)

2 31 January

2011

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.

Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity)

AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY

Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/)

Change No. Date

1 20 July 2010

Location

Modified Appendix G, Table 17 regarding Haiti; modified paragraph 2-1.2.1

Modified to conform to the adoption of IBC 2009; other minor revisions

CANCELLED

This UFC supersedes UFC 3-300-10N, dated May 2005; UFC 3-310-01, dated 25 May 2005; UFC 3-

310-02A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-310-05A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-310-07A, dated 19 June

2006; UFC 3-320-01A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-320-02A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-320-04A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-320-05A, dated 1 March 2005; UFC 3-330-01A, dated 1 March 2005.

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

FOREWORD

The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation-Funded Construction

Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.)

Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the more stringent of the UFC, the

SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.

UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities

Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency (AFCESA) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the preparing service proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request (CCR) . The form is accessible from the Internet site listed below.

UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following source:

• Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/

.

Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.

______________________________________

JAMES C. DALTON, P.E.

Chief, Engineering and Construction

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

______________________________________

JOSEPH E. GOTT, P.E.

Chief Engineer

Naval Facilities Engineering Command

CANCELLED

(Installations and Environment)

______________________________________

DENNIS FIRMAN

______________________________________

MICHAEL McANDREW

Director of the Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment

Department of the Air Force

Director, Facility Investment and

Management

Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)

REVISION SUMMARY SHEET

Document:

UFC 3-301-01, Structural Engineering

Superseding:

UFC 3-300-10N, Structural Engineering, UFC 3-310-01, Structural Load

Data,

UFC 3-310-02A, Structural Design Criteria for Buildings, UFC 3-310-05A,

Masonry Structural Design for Buildings,

UFC 3-310-07A, Cold-Formed Load Bearing

Steel Systems and Masonry Veneer/Steel Stud Walls,

UFC 3-320-01A, Welding –

Design Procedures and Inspections,

UFC 3-320-02A, Design and Construction of

Conventionally Reinforced Ribbed Mat Slabs,

UFC 3-320-04A, Metal Building Systems,

UFC 3-320-05A, Structural Design Criteria for Structures Other Than Buildings, and

UFC 3-330-01A, Commentary on Snow Loads.

Description of Changes:

This replacement for UFC 3-300-10N, UFC 3-310-01, UFC

3-310-02A, UFC 3-310-05A, UFC 3-310-07A, UFC 3-320-01A, UFC 3-320-02A, UFC 3-

320-04A, UFC 3-320-05A and UFC 3-330-01A provides requirements for the design and renovation of new and existing structures. The new UFC adopts the structural design provisions of the \2\ 2009 International Building Code (IBC 2009) /2/ for use in

DoD building design.

Reasons for Changes:

• The new UFC updates the guidance contained in several existing structural engineering documents and consolidates it into a single UFC. The updated UFC is designed to be consistent with and to supplement the guidance contained in the IBC \2\ 2009 /2/ as modified by UFC 1-200-01.

The superseded UFC documents included requirements that were not consistent with industry standards.

Impact:

There are negligible cost impacts. However, the following benefits should be realized:

CANCELLED

Non-Unified Items:

This document contains no non-unified items.

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1

2-1.2.3

2.1.2.4

2.1.2.5

2-1.2.6

2-1.3

2-1.3.1

2-1.3.2

2-1.4

2-1.4.1

1-1

1-2

1-3

1-4

1-4.1

1-4.2

1-4.3

1-4.4

PURPOSE AND SCOPE ..................................................................................... 1

BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 1

APPLICABILITY ................................................................................................... 1

OTHER CRITERIA ............................................................................................... 2

General Building Requirements ........................................................................... 2

Seismic Design .................................................................................................... 2

Antiterrorism ........................................................................................................ 2

Progressive Collapse ........................................................................................... 2

1-5 REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 2

CHAPTER 2 – MODIFICATIONS TO IBC .................................................................................. 3

2-1

2-1.1

CHAPTER 16 - STRUCTURAL DESIGN ............................................................. 3

Section 1603 - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS................................................. 3

2-1.1.1

2-1.2

2-1.2.1

2-1.2.2

1603.2 - Delegated Engineered Systems [Addition] ............................................. 3

Section 1604 - GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ........................................ 3

1604.3 - Serviceability [Supplement] .................................................................... 3

1604.3.1 - Deflections [Replacement] .................................................................. 4

1604.3.6 - Limits [Replacement] ........................................................................... 4

1604.5 - Occupancy Category [Replacement] ...................................................... 5

Table 1604.5 [Replacement] ................................................................................ 5

1604.11 - Fall Prevention and Protection [Addition] .............................................. 8

Section 1607 - LIVE LOADS ................................................................................ 8

2-1.4.2

2-1.4.3

1607.1- General [Replacement] ........................................................................... 9

Table 1607.1 [Replacement] ................................................................................ 9

CANCELLED

1608.5 - Snow Load Case Studies [Addition] ....................................................... 9

Section 1609 - WIND LOADS .............................................................................. 9

1609.2 - Definitions [Replacement] ...................................................................... 9

2-1.5

2-1.5.1

2-1.5.2

2-1.5.3

2-1.5.4

1609.3.1 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Replacement] ............... 10

1609.3.2 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States [Addition] ................ 10

1609.3.3 - Wind Speed Conversion [Addition] .................................................... 10

i

2-4.1.1

2-4.2

2-4.2.1

2-4.3

2-4.3.1

2-4.3.2

2-4.3.2.1

2-4.3.2.2

2-4.3.2.3

2-5

2-5.1

2-5.1.1

2-5.1.2

2-5.1.3

2-5.1.4

2-5.1.5

2-5.2

2-5.2.1

2-1.6

2-1.6.1

2-1.6.2

2-2

2-2.1

2-2.1.1

2-2.1.2

2-2.1.3

2-3

2-3.1.1

2-3.1.2

2-3.2

2-3.2.1

2-4

2-4.1

JOINTS

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Section 1613 - EARTHQUAKE LOADS ............................................................. 10

1613.5.1.1 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Addition] .................... 10

1613.5.1.2 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States [Addition] ............. 11

CHAPTER 17 - STRUCTURAL TESTS AND SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ............ 11

Section 1703 - APPROVALS ............................................................................. 11

1703.4 - Performance [Replacement] ................................................................. 11

1703.4.1 - Research and Investigation [Deletion] ............................................... 12

1703.4.2 - Research Reports [Deletion] ............................................................. 12

CHAPTER 18 - SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS .................................................... 12

1808.4.1 - Vibratory Loads [Supplement] ........................................................... 12

1808.8.2.1 - Reinforcement [Addition] ................................................................ 12

Section 1809 - SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ....................................................... 12

1809.5.1 - Frost Line Depth [Addition] ................................................................ 12

CHAPTER 19 - CONCRETE .............................................................................. 13

Section 1906 – FORMWORK, EMBEDDED PIPES AND CONSTRUCTION

.......................................................................................................................... 13

1906.4 - Construction Joints[Replacement] ........................................................ 13

Section 1907 - DETAILS OF REINFORCEMENT .............................................. 13

1907.7.6 - Corrosive Environments [Supplement] .............................................. 13

Section 1910 - MINIMUM SLAB PROVISIONS .................................................. 13

1910.1 - General [Replacement] ........................................................................ 13

1910.2 - Slab-on-Ground Design [Addition] ........................................................ 13

1910.2.1 - Wall Loads on Slab-on-Ground [Addition] ......................................... 13

1910.2.2 - Slab-on-Ground Over Permafrost [Addition] ...................................... 14

1910.2.3 - Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Ground [Addition] ....................................... 14

CANCELLED

2101.2.2 - Strength Design [Supplement] .......................................................... 18

2101.2.4 - Empirical Design [Replacement] ....................................................... 18

2101.4 - Coupling Beams [Addition] ................................................................... 18

2101.5 - Shear Wall Construction [Addition] ....................................................... 18

Section 2104 - CONSTRUCTION ...................................................................... 18

2104.1.2 - Placing Mortar and Units [Supplement] ............................................. 18

ii

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

2104.1.3 - Installation of Wall Ties [Supplement] ............................................... 18 2-5.2.2

2-5.2.3

2-5.2.4

2-5.2.5

2-5.3

2-6

2-6.1

2-6.1.1

2-6.2

2-6.2.1

2-6.2.2

2-6.3

2-6.3.1

2-6.4

2-6.4.1

2-6.4.2

2-6.4.3

2-6.4.4

2-6.4.5

2-6.4.6

2104.1.7 - Joint Reinforcement [Addition] .......................................................... 19

2104.1.8 - Concrete Masonry Control Joints [Addition] ...................................... 19

2104.1.9 - Vertical Brick Expansion Joints [Addition] .......................................... 19

Section 2109 - EMPIRICAL DESIGN OF MASONRY [Deletion] ......................... 19

CHAPTER 22 - STEEL ...................................................................................... 19

Section 2204 - CONNECTIONS ......................................................................... 19

2204.2 - Bolting [Supplement] ............................................................................ 19

Section 2205 - STRUCTURAL STEEL ............................................................... 19

2205.1 - General [Supplement] .......................................................................... 19

2205.4 - Steel Structures in Corrosive Environments [Addition] ......................... 20

Section 2209 - COLD-FORMED STEEL ............................................................ 20

2209.2.4 - Steel Deck Diaphragms [Addition] ..................................................... 20

Section 2210 - COLD-FORMED STEEL LIGHT-FRAMED CONSTRUCTION ... 20

2210.4.1 - Wall Stud Design [Addition] .............................................................. 20

2210.6.1 - Diagonal Bracing Material [Addition] ................................................. 20

2210.8 - Floor Vibrations [Addition] .................................................................... 20

2210.9 - Brick Veneer/Steel Stud Walls [Addition] .............................................. 21

2210.10 - Cold-Formed Steel Connections [Addition] ......................................... 21

2210.11 - Galvanized Cold-Formed Framing [Addition] ...................................... 21

CHAPTER 3 – OTHER STRUCTURES ....................................................................................22

3-1

3-2

HIGHWAY BRIDGE DESIGN............................................................................. 22

RAILROAD BRIDGE DESIGN ........................................................................... 22

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

3-7

3-8

TANKS FOR LIQUID STORAGE ....................................................................... 22

TANKS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE ............................................................. 22

CANCELLED

TRANSMISSION TOWERS AND POLES .......................................................... 22

ANTENNA TOWERS ......................................................................................... 23 3-9

APPENDIX A – REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 24

APPENDIX B – BEST PRACTICES .......................................................................................... 31

APPENDIX C – ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ 36

iii

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX D - MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND MINIMUM

CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS .............................................................................................. 38

APPENDIX E - SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES, ITS

TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS ....................................................................................... 45

APPENDIX F - SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA – OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED

STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS ................................................................. 69

APPENDIX G - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA AT ADDITIONAL SELECTED LOCATIONS

OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS .................... 84

APPENDIX H - SEISMIC SPECTRAL ACCELERATION MAPS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS

OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS .................... 92

TABLES

TABLE 2-1 - LATERAL DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR FRAMING SUPPORTING EXTERIOR

WALL FINISHES

a,b,c

.................................................................................................................. 4

TABLE 2-2 - OCCUPANCY CATEGORY OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES .......... 6

TABLE 2-3 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL

LOAD NEAR CENTER OF SLAB OR NEAR KEYED OR DOWELED JOINTS .........................15

TABLE 2-4 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL

LOAD NEAR FREE EDGE ........................................................................................................16

TABLE D-1 MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND MINIMUM

CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS ..............................................................................................38

TABLE E-1 - STRUCTURAL CLIMATIC LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES, ITS

TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS .......................................................................................45

TABLE E-2 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND

POSSESSIONS ........................................................................................................................58

TABLE F-1 - STRUCTURAL CLIMATIC LOADING DATA – OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED

STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS .................................................................69

TABLE F-2 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA – OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS

CANCELLED

iv

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

FIGURES

FIGURE 2-1 - WIDTHS OF THICKENED SLABS AND SLAB EDGE CONDITIONS UNDER

WALL LOADS ..........................................................................................................................17

FIGURE H-1 - AFGHANISTAN - HORIZONTAL SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION

FOR 1.0 SECOND PERIOD (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING) WITH 2 PERCENT

PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS .....................................................................92

FIGURE H-2 - AFGHANISTAN - HORIZONTAL SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION

FOR 0.2 SECOND PERIOD (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING) WITH 2 PERCENT

PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS .....................................................................93

CANCELLED

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION

1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This Unified Facility Criteria (UFC) provides requirements for structures designed and constructed for the Department of Defense (DoD). These technical requirements are based on the \2\ 2009 International Building Code (IBC 2009) /2/, as modified by UFC 1-

200-01. This information shall be used by structural engineers to develop design calculations, specifications, plans, and design-build Requests for Proposal (RFPs).

1-2 BACKGROUND

UFC 1-200-01 uses and supplements IBC \2\ 2009 /2/ as the building code for DoD.

Chapter 2 of this UFC further modifies the IBC for structural-specific design requirements and is organized by the chapter of IBC that each section modifies. The climatic and seismic data included in this UFC is intended as a tool to assist in the consistent interpretation of the data in the IBC at significant DoD installations within the

United States, and as the basis for applying the provisions of UFC 1-200-01 to significant DoD installations outside of the United States. Chapter 3 provides additional guidance for the design of structures other than buildings. The IBC \2\ 2009 /2/ section modifications are one of four actions, according to the following legend:

[Addition]

– Add new section, including new section number, not shown in IBC

\2\ 2009 /2/.

[Deletion]

– Delete referenced IBC \2\ 2009 /2/ section.

[Replacement]

– Delete referenced IBC \2\ 2009 /2/ section or noted portion and replace it with the narrative shown.

[Supplement]

– Add narrative shown as a supplement to the narrative shown in the referenced section of IBC \2\ 2009 /2/.

1-3

CANCELLED

1

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

1-4 OTHER CRITERIA

Military criteria other than those listed in this document may be applicable to specific types of structure. Such structures shall meet the additional requirements of the applicable military criteria.

1-4.1 General Building Requirements

For general building requirements, refer to UFC 1-200-01.

1-4.2 Seismic Design

For seismic design for buildings, refer to UFC 3-310-04.

1-4.3 Antiterrorism

For antiterrorism requirements, refer to UFC 4-010-01.

1-4.4 Progressive Collapse

For design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, refer to UFC 4-023-03.

1-5 REFERENCES

For references see Appendix A.

CANCELLED

2

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

CHAPTER 2 – MODIFICATIONS TO IBC

2-1

2-1.1

CHAPTER 16 - STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Section 1603 - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

2-1.1.1 1603.2 - Delegated Engineered Systems [Addition]

The engineer of record for a structure may delegate responsibility for the design of systems or component parts of the structure to a qualified delegated engineer. Both the engineer of record for the structure and the delegated engineer must comply with the requirements of this UFC. The following are some examples of delegated systems. a. Prefabricated wood components b. Cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete structural systems c. Precast, prestressed concrete components d. Open web steel joists and joist girders e. Pre-engineered metal buildings f. Foundation systems g. Structural steel connections h. Cold-formed steel joist/stud/truss framing and pre-fabricated components i. Seismic anchorage of equipment j. Proprietary track for under-hung cranes and monorails k. Autoclaved aerated concrete

The structural engineer of record must review all submittals that have been signed and sealed by the delegated engineer, to verify compliance with the design intent and the specified design criteria and to ensure coordination with the contract documents and other shop drawings. All submittals from the delegated engineer must be approved by the engineer of record prior to the start of fabrication of the system or component part and prior to any field construction that may be affected by the system or component part.

2-1.2

2-1.2.1

CANCELLED

1604.3 - Serviceability [Supplement]

The structural designer shall ensure that the maximum allowable frame drift is suitable for the proposed structure considering all details of construction. See ASCE 7 Appendix

C “Serviceability Considerations” including commentary, and Section B-1.1 of UFC 3-

301-01 for additional guidance.

3

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Wall systems and other building elements that are not part of the lateral force resisting system in the direction under consideration shall be designed to be adequate to safely support all applied loadings in combination with the forces resulting from the displacements due to the design story drift; either from wind or seismic; or be isolated to ensure that they are not susceptible to damage. Masonry and other brittle wall systems are particularly susceptible to damage if not properly integrated into the design to ensure that they can adequately resist the stresses resulting from the building deformations or are effectively isolated to prevent damage.

Exception:

Reinforced concrete frame members not designed as part of the seismic lateral force-resisting system shall comply with Section 21.9 of ACI 318.

All structural vertical load bearing wall elements shall be considered to be part of the lateral force-resisting system. All applicable provisions of UFC 3-310-04 Table B-2 shall apply.

2-1.2.2 1604.3.1 - Deflections [Replacement]

Deflections of structural members shall not exceed the more restrictive of the limitations of Sections 1604.3.2 through 1604.3.5 or those permitted by Table 1604.3, or Table 2-1 of UFC 3-301-01.

2-1.2.3 1604.3.6 - Limits [Replacement]

Deflection of structural members over span, l, shall not exceed that permitted by Table

1604.3 or Table 2-1 of UFC 3-301-01.

TABLE 2-1 - LATERAL DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR FRAMING SUPPORTING

EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES

a,b,c

Brick veneer

Stucco

L/600

L/360

CANCELLED

Plywood and Wood-Based Structural-Use

Panels

Gypsum sheathing

Metal or vinyl siding

L/240

L/240

L/240

4

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Notes to Table 2-1, “LATERAL DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR FRAMING SUPPORTING

EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES”

a. Lateral deflection limits under seismic or wind loads b. The wind load is permitted to be taken as 0.7 times the c. For cantilevered members, L shall be taken as twice the length of the cantilever.

“component and cladding” loads for the purpose of determining the deflection limits herein.

2.1.2.4 1604.5 - Occupancy Category [Replacement]

Buildings shall be assigned an occupancy category in accordance with Table 2-2 of

UFC 3-301-01. Importance factors for snow load, \2\ wind load, seismic load, and ice /2/ for each occupancy category are also shown in Table 2-2 of UFC 3-301-01.

Note:

IBC section 1604.5.1 shall remain in effect as written.

2.1.2.5 Table 1604.5 [Replacement]

Replace Table 1604.5 of the IBC with Table 2-2 of this UFC. (All references in the IBC to Table 1604.5 shall be interpreted as a reference to Table 2-2 of this UFC.)

CANCELLED

5

III

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

\2\

Occupancy

Category

TABLE 2-2 - OCCUPANCY CATEGORY OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER

STRUCTURES

Nature of Occupancy

Seismic

Factor

I

E

Snow

Factor

I

S

Wind

Factor

I

W

Ice

Factor

I i

I

II

Buildings and other structures that represent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure, including, but not limited to:

• Agricultural facilities

• Certain temporary facilities

Minor storage facilities

Buildings and other structures except those listed in Categories I, III, IV and V

Buildings and other structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life or represent significant economic loss in the event of failure, including, but not limited to:

1.00

1.00

0.8

1.00

0.87

a

0.80

1.00 1.00

• Buildings and other structures whose primary occupancy is public assembly with an occupant load greater than 300 people

• Buildings and other structures containing elementary school, secondary school, or daycare facilities with an occupant load greater than 250

• Buildings and other structures with an occupant load greater than 500

• Group I-2 occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more resident patients, but not having surgery or emergency treatment facilities

• Group I-3 occupancies

• Power-generating stations; water treatment facilities for potable water, waste water treatment facilities, and other public utility facilities that are not included in

Categories IV and V

• Buildings and other structures not included in

Categories IV and V containing sufficient quantities of toxic, flammable, or explosive substances to be dangerous to the public if released

1.25 1.10 1.15

CANCELLED

1.25

6

IV

V b

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Buildings and other structures designed as essential facilities, including, but not limited to:

• Group I-2 occupancies having surgery or emergency treatment facilities

• Fire, rescue, and police stations, and emergency vehicle garages

• Designated earthquake, hurricane, or other emergency shelters

• Designated emergency preparedness, communication, and operation centers, and other facilities required for emergency response

• Emergency backup power-generating facilities required for primary power for Category IV

• Power-generating stations and other utility facilities required for primary power for Category IV, if emergency backup power generating facilities are not available

• Structures containing highly toxic materials as defined by

Section 307, where the quantity of material exceeds the maximum allowable quantities of Table 307.7(2)

• Aviation control towers and air traffic control centers required for post earthquake operations where lack of system redundancy does not allow for immediate control of airspace and the use of alternate temporary control facilities is not feasible. Contact the authority having jurisdiction for additional guidance.

• Emergency aircraft hangars that house aircraft required for post-earthquake emergency response; if no suitable back up facilities exist

• Buildings and other structures not included in Category V, having DoD mission-essential command, control, primary communications, data handling, and intelligence functions that are not duplicated at geographically separate locations, as designated by the using agency

• Water storage facilities and pump stations required to maintain water pressure for fire suppression

Facilities designed as national strategic military assets, including, but not limited to:

• Key national defense assets (e.g. National Missile

Defense facilities), as designated by the authority having jurisdiction.

• Facilities involved in operational missile control, launch, tracking, or other critical defense capabilities

• Emergency backup power-generating facilities required for primary power for Category V occupancy

• Power-generating stations and other utility facilities required for primary power for Category V occupancy, if emergency backup power generating facilities are not available

• Facilities involved in storage, handling, or processing of nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological materials, where structural failure could have widespread catastrophic consequences, as designated by the authority having jurisdiction.

1.50 1.20 1.15

1.70

1.25

1.50

7

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Notes to Table 2-2, “OCCUPANCY CATEGORIES OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER

STRUCTURES”

a. In hurricane-prone regions with V>100 miles per hour, I

w

shall be 0.77 for category I structures. b. An Occupancy Category has been added to address national strategic military assets. A Seismic Importance Factor, I

E

Use Group IV)

, is not required for the design of these facilities. (Occupancy Category V is equivalent to Seismic

/2/

2-1.2.6 1604.11 - Fall Prevention and Protection [Addition]

Fall prevention and protection shall be considered at a facility whenever there is a need or requirement to perform maintenance work at high locations, deliver material to or store equipment at heights as defined by OSHA 29 CFR 1926, subpart M, 29 CFR

1910, subpart D, American National Standards Institute ANSI A1264.1, and ANSI Z359

“Fall Protection Code”. At the planning and design phase of a project, fall hazards shall be considered and eliminated whenever possible. When elimination or prevention of fall hazards is not feasible, the design shall include certified and labeled anchorages meeting the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR 1926.502, subpart M, and the American

National Standards Institute, ANSI Z359. Where fall protection is required in the vicinity of weight-handling equipment, care must be taken to prevent potential conflicts between the weight-handling equipment and the fall protection measures.

2-1.2.6.1 1604.11.1 -

Loads [Addition]

Fall protection loads (including dynamic / impact) shall be considered as live loads when applying the load combinations of Section 1605.

2-1.2.6.2 1604.11.2 -

Load Combinations [Addition]

Fall protection loads need not be combined with roof live loads or with more than three-

2-1.2.6.3

CANCELLED percent to allow for impact.

2-1.3 Section 1607

- LIVE LOADS

Table D-1 of this UFC includes IBC Table 1607.1 with additional Occupancy or Use classifications for military facilities. The additional classifications that have been added to IBC Table 1607.1 are shown in bold italics within Table D-1.

8

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

2-1.3.1 1607.1- General [Replacement]

Live loads are those loads defined in Section 1602.1. Table D-1 of UFC 3-301-01 defines minimum uniformly distributed live loads and minimum concentrated live loads for the design of structures.

2-1.3.2 Table 1607.1 [Replacement]

Replace Table 1607.1 of the IBC with Table D-1 of this UFC. (All references in the IBC to Table 1607.1 shall be interpreted as a reference to Table D-1 of this UFC.)

2-1.4 Section 1608 - SNOW LOADS

2-1.4.1 1608.3 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Addition]

Ground snow loads at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-1 of UFC 3-301-01, to facilitate consistent interpretation of the information provided in Figure 1608.2 and Table 1608.2.

2-1.4.2 1608.4 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States [Addition]

Ground snow loads at specific locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table F-1 of UFC 3-301-01. At locations where the ground snow load is not provided, use the best available locality information. For additional guidance contact the \2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/.

2-1.4.3 1608.5 - Snow Load Case Studies [Addition]

2-1.5

Snow load case studies may be done to clarify and refine snow loadings at site-specific locations with the approval of the \2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/. The methodology

CANCELLED

2-1.5.1 1609.2 - Definitions [Replacement]

Replace the definition of Wind-Borne Debris Region with the following:

9

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGION.

For locations within the United States and its territories and possessions, portions of hurricane-prone regions that are within 1 mile

(1.61 km) of the coastal mean high water line where the basic wind speed is 100 mph

(48 m/s) or greater; or portions of hurricane-prone regions where the basic wind speed is 120 mph (53 m/s) or greater; or Hawaii.

For locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions, regions where the basic wind speed is 120 mph (53 m/s) or greater.

2-1.5.2 1609.3.1 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Replacement]

Basic wind speeds at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-1 of UFC 3-301-01 to facilitate consistent interpretation of the information provided in Figure 1609.

2-1.5.3 1609.3.2 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States [Addition]

Basic wind speeds at specific locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table F-1 of UFC 3-301-01. At locations where the basic wind speed is not provided, use the best available locality information. For additional guidance contact the \2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/.

Use a minimum wind speed of 85 mph (137 km/h) at all locations unless a lower wind speed is approved by the \2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/.

2-1.5.4 1609.3.3 - Wind Speed Conversion [Addition]

2-1.6

V

V

When required, the 3-second gust basic wind speeds of Figure 1609 shall be converted to fastest-mile wind speeds, V

fm

, using Table 1609.3.1 or \2\ Equation 16-32 /2/.

fm

3S

=(V where:

3S

-10.5)/1.05 \2\ (Equation 16-32) /2/

CANCELLED

Section 1613 - EARTHQUAKE LOADS

2-1.6.1 1613.5.1.1 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Addition]

Seismic acceleration parameters at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-2 of UFC 3-301-01 to facilitate

10

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

consistent interpretation of the information provided in Figures 1613.5(1) through

1613.5(14).

The values in Table E-2 were determined utilizing the web-based United States

Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters Calculator, Version

5.0.8, for the 2006 version of the International Building Code, utilizing latitude and longitude data. This tool or other approved software may be used to determine seismic design data where site-specific location information is available, with the approval of the

\2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/.

The seismic acceleration parameters in Table E-2 were typically determined at the approximate geographical centroid of the installation / city. For larger installations and where the potential seismic accelerations vary considerably over relatively short distances, it may not be appropriate to use the acceleration values at the installation centroid. At select locations the maximum and minimum values of S

S

and S

1

within the installation are listed. Use the maximum values unless site-specific location (latitude / longitude) information is available and lesser values can be justified by the use of

Figures 1613.5(1) through 1613.5(14) or by approved computerized tools for determining seismic ground motion parameters. For additional guidance contact the \2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/.

2-1.6.2 1613.5.1.2 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States

[Addition]

Seismic ground motion parameters S

S

and S

1

at specific locations outside of the United

States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table F-2 and G-1 of UFC 3-

301-01. For locations not shown, the best available information shall be used with the approval of the \2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/. Appendix H includes available seismic spectral acceleration maps at selected locations outside of the United States.

These maps may be used to interpolate the seismic ground motions at locations that are not identified in Tables F-2 and G-1.

2-2

2-2.1

2-2.1.1

CHAPTER 17 - STRUCTURAL TESTS AND SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

CANCELLED

1703.4 - Performance [Replacement]

New, unusual, or innovative materials, systems or methods previously untried may be incorporated into designs when evidence shows that such use is in the best interest of the Government from the standpoint of economy, lower life-cycle costs, and quality of construction. Supporting data, where necessary to assist in the approval of materials or assemblies not specifically provided for in the code, shall consist of valid evaluation

11

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

reports from International Code Council – Evaluation Services (ICC-ES), \1\ or other qualified testing and evaluation service with the prior approval of the \2\ authority having jurisdiction. /2/ /1/

2-2.1.2 1703.4.1 - Research and Investigation [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety.

\2\

2-2.1.3 1703.4.2 - Research Reports [Deletion]

/2/

This section shall be deleted in its entirety.

2-3 CHAPTER 18 - SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

\2\

2-3.1

2-3.1.1

Section 1808 - FOUNDATIONS

1808.4.1 - Vibratory Loads [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Design foundations in accordance with

ACI 351.3R, ACI 350.4R and UFC 3-220-10N.

2-3.1.2 1808.8.2.1 - Reinforcement [Addition]

For footings over three feet (914 mm) thick, the minimum ratio of reinforcement area to gross concrete area in each direction shall be 0.0015, with not less than one-half nor more than two-thirds of the total reinforcement required placed in any one face.

Minimum bar size shall be No. 4 (#13M) with a maximum spacing of 12 inches (305 mm).

2-3.2

2-3.2.1

CANCELLED

1809.5.1 - Frost Line Depth [Addition]

/2/

Depths to the frost line at specific locations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-1 of UFC 3-301-01. Frost line depths at specific locations outside of the United States are identified in Table F-1 of UFC 3-301-

12

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

01. At locations where frost depths are not provided, use the best available locality information. For additional guidance contact the \2\ authority having jurisdiction /2/ .

2-4 CHAPTER 19 - CONCRETE

\2\

2-4.1 Section 1906 – FORMWORK, EMBEDDED PIPES AND

CONSTRUCTION JOINTS

2-4.1.1 1906.4 - Construction Joints[Replacement]

Provide construction, contraction, and expansion joints in structures in accordance with

ACI 224.3R and ACI 318, Section 6.4.

2-4.2 Section 1907 - DETAILS OF REINFORCEMENT

2-4.2.1 1907.7.6 - Corrosive Environments [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: In a marine environment where concrete is subjected to salt-water wave action and spray, reinforcement protection shall be in accordance with ACI 357R.

2-4.3 Section 1910 - MINIMUM SLAB PROVISIONS

/2/

2-4.3.1 1910.1 - General [Replacement]

Replace the first line of the paragraph to read: The thickness of concrete floor slabs

2-4.3.2

CANCELLED ground supporting aircraft loading shall be designed in accordance with UFC 3-260-02.

2-4.3.2.1 1910.2.1 - Wall Loads on Slab-on-Ground [Addition]

13

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Slabs-on-ground shall have adequate thickness to support wall line load as indicated in

Tables 2-3 and 2-4. The thickened portion shall have a minimum width as shown in

Figure 2-1.

2-4.3.2.2 1910.2.2 - Slab-on-Ground Over Permafrost [Addition]

Design and construction of slabs-on-ground over permafrost shall be in accordance with

UFC 3-130-01 and UFC 3-130-04.

2-4.3.2.3 1910.2.3 - Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Ground [Addition]

The design of post-tensioned slabs-on-ground shall be in accordance with PTI DC10.1.

CANCELLED

14

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE 2-3 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR

WALL LOAD NEAR CENTER OF SLAB OR NEAR KEYED OR DOWELED JOINTS

Thickness of

Thickened Floor

Slab, t e

(inches) 550

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

425

565

710

860

1015

1175

1340

Slab Line Load Capacity, P (lb/ft)

Flexural Strength a

of Concrete (lb/in

2

)

600

455

600

755

920

1080

1255

1430

650

485

640

805

975

1150

1330

1520

700

510

675

850

1030

1215

1410

1605

CANCELLED

15

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE 2-4 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR

WALL LOAD NEAR FREE EDGE

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

Thickness of

Thickened Floor

Slab, t e

(inches) 550

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

330

435

550

665

785

910

1040

Slab Line Load Capacity, P (lb/ft)

Flexural Strength a

of Concrete (lb/in

2

)

600

355

465

585

710

840

975

1110

650

375

495

620

755

890

1035

1180

700

395

525

660

800

945

1090

1245

Notes for Table 2-3 and Table 2-4: The allowable wall loads are based on a modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of 100 pounds per cubic inch. The thickness of the thickened slab will be computed by multiplying the above thickness by a constant factor. Constants for other subgrade moduli are tabulated below.

Modulus of

CANCELLED

For other modulus of subgrade reaction values the constant values may be found from the equation

5

/

. a

For this application the flexural strength of concrete was assumed equal to 9

f '

c

where f’c is the specified compressive strength of concrete (lb/in

2

).

16

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

FIGURE 2-1 - WIDTHS OF THICKENED SLABS AND SLAB EDGE CONDITIONS UNDER

WALL LOADS

A) SLABS LOADED NEAR THE CENTER

B) SLABS LOADED NEAR A KEYED OR DOWELED JOINT

CANCELLED

C) SLABS LOADED NEAR A FREE EDGE

17

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

CHAPTER 21 - MASONRY 2-5

2-5.1 Section 2101 - GENERAL

2-5.1.1 2101.2.1 - Allowable Stress Design [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Masonry shall be designed as reinforced unless the element is isolated from the structure so that vertical and lateral forces are not imparted to the element.

.

2-5.1.2 2101.2.2 - Strength Design [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Masonry shall be designed as reinforced unless the element is isolated from the structure so that vertical and lateral forces are not imparted to the element.

2-5.1.3 2101.2.4 - Empirical Design [Replacement]

Masonry shall not be designed by the empirical method.

\2\

2-5.1.4 2101.4 - Coupling Beams [Addition]

Design of coupling beams shall be in accordance with paragraph 14.4.7.3 of ASCE 7.

2-5.1.5 2101.5 - Shear Wall Construction [Addition]

Shear walls shall be running bond construction only; stack bond construction is not permitted.

2-5.2

2-5.2.1

grouted solid.

CANCELLED

Add the following line to the end of the paragraph: Masonry walls below grade shall be

2-5.2.2 2104.1.3 - Installation of Wall Ties [Supplement]

Add the following line to the end of the paragraph: Corrugated metal brick ties shall not be used.

18

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

2-5.2.3 2104.1.7 - Joint Reinforcement [Addition]

Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be continuous around wall corners and through wall intersections, unless the intersecting walls are separated. Reinforcement that is spliced in accordance with the applicable provisions of ACI 530 shall be considered continuous.

2-5.2.4 2104.1.8 - Concrete Masonry Control Joints [Addition]

Spacing and placement of control joints shall be in accordance with NCMA TEK 10-2B or 10-3.

2-5.2.5 2104.1.9 - Vertical Brick Expansion Joints [Addition]

Spacing, placement, and size of vertical brick expansion joints shall be in accordance with BIA Technical Notes 18 and 18A.

2-5.3 Section 2109 - EMPIRICAL DESIGN OF MASONRY [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety.

/2/

2-6 CHAPTER 22 - STEEL

2-6.1 Section 2204 - CONNECTIONS

2-6.1.1 2204.2 - Bolting [Supplement]

2-6.2

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Compressible-washer-type direct

CANCELLED

Section 2205 - STRUCTURAL STEEL

conforming to RCSC,

Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts

shall be provided at

2-6.2.1 2205.1 - General [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Structural steel floor framing systems shall be designed for vibration serviceability in accordance with AISC Design Guide 11.

19

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

2205.4 - Steel Structures in Corrosive Environments [Addition] 2-6.2.2

Steel structures or elements exposed to weather, salt spray or other corrosive environments shall be protected through coatings, galvanizing or the use of stainless alloy. Select the appropriate system or material to suite the anticipated exposure. For steel deck exposed to spray from salt, salt water, or brackish water, provide ASTM

A653 G90 galvanizing. For cold-formed steel members exposed to spray from salt, salt water, or brackish water, provide ASTM A653 G90 galvanizing and connect with corrosion-resistant fasteners. See Section B-5.5 of UFC 3-301-01 for additional guidance.

2-6.3 Section 2209 - COLD-FORMED STEEL

\2\

2-6.3.1 2209.2.4 - Steel Deck Diaphragms [Addition]

/2/

Design of steel deck diaphragms for in-plane loads shall be in accordance with the SDI

DDM03. Design of steel deck for out-of-plane loads shall be in accordance with SDI

Design Manual No. 31.

2-6.4 Section 2210 - COLD-FORMED STEEL LIGHT-FRAMED

CONSTRUCTION

\2\

2-6.4.1 2210.4.1 - Wall Stud Design [Addition]

Wall stud assemblies shall be constructed so that the studs are firmly placed in the track prior to attachment, with no gaps between the wall stud and the attached track.

2-6.4.2

CANCELLED

2210.6.1 - Diagonal Bracing Material [Addition]

Diagonal bracing material shall be ASTM A653 steel without rerolling, which induces strain hardening and reduces the elongation of the material which is not desirable for performance under seismic loading.

2-6.4.3 2210.8 - Floor Vibrations [Addition]

20

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Cold-formed steel framing systems shall be designed for vibration serviceability in accordance with the proposed design procedure in Floor Vibration Design Criterion for

Cold-Formed C-Shaped Supported Residential Floor Systems

thesis by Kraus and

Murray. Proposed design procedure is based on residential construction, but is applicable to all applications of cold-formed floor construction.

2-6.4.4 2210.9 - Brick Veneer/Steel Stud Walls [Addition]

Design of steel stud backup for brick veneer shall follow the recommendations from BIA

Technical Note 28B. In particular the recommendations for minimum stud gage, minimum galvanization, minimum anchorage of studs to track, welding of studs, use of deflection track, allowable stud deflection, wall sheathing and water-resistant barrier shall be followed.

2-6.4.5 2210.10 - Cold-Formed Steel Connections [Addition]

Cold-formed steel members shall be interconnected with screw fasteners or by welding.

The use of pneumatic nailing is permitted only for the connection of cold-formed members to other materials.

2-6.4.6 2210.11 - Galvanized Cold-Formed Framing [Addition]

Cold-formed steel members exposed to spray from salt, salt water, brackish water, or seawater shall be galvanized per ASTM A653 G90 and all fasteners shall be corrosionresistant.

/2/

CANCELLED

21

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

CHAPTER 3 – OTHER STRUCTURES

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

HIGHWAY BRIDGE DESIGN 3-1

Design of highway bridges shall be in accordance with AASHTO Bridge Design

Specifications and AISC Highway Structures Design Handbook.

3-2 RAILROAD BRIDGE DESIGN

Design of railroad bridges shall be in accordance with the AREMA Manual for Railway

Engineering.

3-3 TANKS FOR LIQUID STORAGE

Design of tanks for liquid storage shall be in accordance with NFPA 22, AWWA D100,

AWWA D103, AWWA D110 and AWWA D120 as applicable.

3-4 TANKS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE

Design of tanks for petroleum storage shall be in accordance with UFC 3-460-01.

3-5 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Design of environmental engineering concrete structures shall be in accordance with

ACI 350-06.

3-6 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE TANKS

3-7

3-8

Design of prestressed concrete tanks shall be in accordance with ACI 372R.

Design of water treatment facilities shall be in accordance with the WEF Manual of

Practice 8.

WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

CANCELLED

TRANSMISSION TOWERS AND POLES

Design of transmission towers shall be in accordance with

ASCE 10. Design of transmission poles shall be in accordance with the National Electric Safety Code.

22

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

3-9 ANTENNA TOWERS

Design of antenna towers shall be in accordance with ANSI/TIA-222-G.

CANCELLED

23

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX A – REFERENCES

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS:

1. Department of Defense

Department of Defense

Washington, DC

UFCs can be obtained on the Whole

Building Design Guide website at http://dod.wbdg.org/

UFC 1-200-01, General Building

Requirements

, 27 November 2007

UFC 3-130-01, General Provisions -

Arctic and Subarctic Construction,

16

January 2004

UFC 3-130-04, Foundations for

Structures - Arctic and Subarctic

Construction,

16 January 2004

UFC 3-220-01N, Geotechnical

Engineering Procedures for Foundation

Design of Buildings and Structures,

15

August 2005

UFC 3-220-03FA, Soils and Geology

Procedures for Foundation Design of

Buildings and Other Structures (Except

Hydraulic Structures)

, 16 January 2004

UFC 3-220-10N, Soil Mechanics, 8 June

2005

UFC 3-260-02, Pavement Design for

Airfields

, 30 June 2001

CANCELLED

March 2005

1

24

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

NON-GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS:

UFC 3-460-01, Petroleum Fuel

Facilities

, 16 January 2004

UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum

Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings

, 8

October 2003

UFC 4-023-03, Design of Buildings to

Resist Progressive Collapse,

25

January 2005

1. American Association of State

Highway and Transportation

Officials

444 N Capitol St. NW, Suite 249

Washington, DC 20001

(202)-624-5800 http://www.transportation.org/

LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,

Customary U.S. Units

, 4th Edition, 2008

Interim Revisions

ACI 223, Standard Practice for the Use

2. American Concrete Institute

38800 Country Club Drive

Farmington Hills, MI 48331

(248) 848-3700 http://www.concrete.org/general/hom e.asp

of Shrinkage-Compensating Concrete,

1998

ACI 224R, Control of Cracking in

Concrete Structures,

2001

ACI 224.3R, Joints in Concrete

Construction,

1995

ACI 302.1R, Guide for Concrete Floor

CANCELLED

ACI 350.4R, Design Considerations for

Environmental Engineering Concrete

Structures,

2004

ACI 350-06, Code Requirements for

Environmental Engineering Concrete

Structures

25

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

3. American Institute of Steel

Construction

One East Wacker Drive

Suite 700

Chicago, IL 60601-1802

(312) 670-2400 http://www.aisc.org/

4. American Iron and Steel Institute

1140 Connecticut Avenue NW

Suite 705

Washington, DC 20036

(202) 452-7100 http://www.steel.org/

ACI 357R, Guide for the Design and

Construction of Fixed Offshore Concrete

Structures,

1984

ACI 360R, Design of Slabs-on-Ground,

2006

ACI 372R, Design and Construction of

Circular Wire- and Strand-Wrapped

Prestressed Concrete Structures,

2003

ACI 530, Building Code Requirements

for Masonry Structures,

2005

AISC 360, Specification for Structural

Steel Buildings

, 2005

AISC Design Guide 3, Serviceability

Design Considerations for Steel

Buildings

, Second Edition, 2003

AISC Design Guide 11, Floor Vibrations

Due to Human Activity

, 1997 with 2003

Revision

Highway Structures Design Handbook

,

Second Edition

RCSC,

Specification for

Structural Joints Using

ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts

, 2004

Version

26

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

5. American National Standards

Institute

1819 L Street, NW

Suite 600

Washington, DC 20036

(202) 293-8020 http://www.ansi.org/

6. American Railway Engineering and

Maintenance-of-Way Association

10003 Derekwood Lane, Suite 210

Lanham, MD 20706

(301) 459-3200 http://www.arema.org/eseries/scriptc ontent/index.cfm

7. American Society of Civil Engineers

1801 Alexander Bell Drive

Reston, VA 20191

(800) 548-2723 http://www.asce.org/asce.cfm

8. American Water Works Association

6666 W. Quincy Ave.

Denver CO 80235

Effective Lengths for Laterally Unbraced

Compression Flanges of Continuous

Beams Near Intermediate Supports,

J.

H. Garrett, Jr., G. Haaijer, and K. H.

Klippstein, Proceedings, Sixth Specialty

Conference on Cold-Formed Steel

Structures ( http://www.ccfssonline.org/ )

ANSI Z359, Fall Protection Code, 2007

ANSI A1264.1,

Safety Requirements for

Workplace Walking/Working Surfaces and Their Access; Workplace Floor,

Wall and Roof Openings, Stairs and

Guardrails Systems,

2007

Manual for Railway Engineering

, 2008

ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for

Buildings and Other Structures,

2005

ASCE 10,

Design of Latticed Steel

Transmission Structures,

1997

AWWA D100, Welded Carbon Steel

Tanks for Water Storage,

2005

CANCELLED

Tanks,

2004

AWWA D120, Thermosetting

Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Tanks,

2002

27

9. ASM World Headquarters

9639 Kinsman Road

Materials Park, OH 44073

(440) 338-5151 http://asmcommunity.asminternation

al.org/portal/site/www/

10. ASTM International

100 Barr Harbor Drive

West Conshohocken, PA, 19428

(610) 832-9500 http://www.astm.org/

11. Brick Industry Association

1850 Centennial Park Drive

Suite 301

Reston, VA 20191

(703) 620-0010 http://www.gobrick.com/index.cfm

12. International Code Council

500 New Jersey Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

(888) 422-7233 http://www.iccsafe.org/

13. McGraw-Hill

P.O. Box 182604

Columbus, OH 43272

(877) 833-5524 http://www.mhprofessional.com/

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

ASM Handbook Volume 13B Corrosion:

Materials,

2005

ASTM A653, Standard Specification for

Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated

(Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process,

2009

ASTM A666, Standard Specification for

Annealed or Cold-Worked Austenitic

Stainless Steel Sheet, Strip, Plate, and

Flat Bar,

2003

BIA Technical Note 18, Volume

Changes – Analysis and Effects of

Movement

, 2006

BIA Technical Note 18A,

Accommodating Expansion of

Brickwork,

2006

BIA Technical Note 28B, Brick

Veneer/Steel Stud Walls,

2005

International Building Code – \2\ 2009

Edition /2/

28

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

14. Metal Building Manufacturers

Association

1300 Sumner Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44115

(216) 241-7333 http://www.mbma.com/

15. National Academy of Sciences

500 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001

(202) 334-2000 http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageS erver

16. National Concrete Masonry

Association

13750 Sunrise Valley Drive

Herndon, VA 20171-4662

(703) 713-1900 http://www.ncma.org/Pages/default.

aspx

17. National Fire Protection Association

1 Batterymarch Park

Quincy, Massachusetts 02169-7471

(617) 770-3000 http://www.nfpa.org/

18. Occupational Safety & Health

Administration

200 Constitution Avenue

Washington, D.C. 20210

(800) 321-6724

Metal Building Systems Manual

, 2006

Technical Report No. 65, Expansion

Joints in Buildings,

1974

TEK 10-2B, Control Joints for Concrete

Masonry Walls – Alternative Engineered

Method,

2003

NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for

Private Fire Protection

Standard 29 CFR, Part 1926, Safety

CANCELLED

(248) 848-3180 http://www.post-tensioning.org/

20. Steel Deck Institute

P.O. Box 25

Fox River Grove, IL 60021

(847) 458-4647 http://www.sdi.org/

29

Masonry Walls – Empirical Method,

2008

TEK 10-3, Control Joints for Concrete

and Health Regulations for Construction

Standard 29 CFR, Part 1910,

Occupational Safety and Health

SDI DDM03, Diaphragm Design Manual

Third Edition,

2004

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

21. Telecommunications Industry

Association

2500 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 300

Arlington, VA 22201

(703) 907-7700 http://www.tiaonline.org/

22. United States Geological Survey

USGS National Center

Earthquake Hazards Program

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive

Reston, VA 20192, USA

(703) 648-4000 http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research

/hazmaps/design/

23. Virginia Tech

Blacksburg, VA 24061

(540) 231-6000 http://www.vt.edu/

24. Water Environment Federation

601 Wythe Street

Alexandria, VA 22314

(800) 666-0206 http://www.wef.org/Home

Design Manual No. 31, Design Manual

for Composite Decks, Form Decks and

Roof Decks,

2007

ANSI/TIA-222-G, Structural Standards

for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna

Supporting Structures,

2005

Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters

Calculator

, Version 5.0.8, for the 2006 version of the International Building

Code

Kraus and Murray, Floor Vibration

Design Criterion for Cold-Formed C-

Shaped Supported

Residential Floor systems

, Masters

Thesis, 10 February 1997

WEF MOP8, Design of Municipal

Wastewater Treatment Plants, 4th

Edition,

1998

CANCELLED

30

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX B – BEST PRACTICES

B-1 STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Building Drift Limits B-1.1

The IBC and ASCE 7 provide guidance and discussion on establishing drift limits and load combinations that must be considered in evaluating serviceability. The establishment of acceptable drift limits requires significant engineering judgment.

Application of a requirement that is too stringent can significantly impact the cost of a structure. Requirements that are too lax can lead to damage of rigidly connected components.

The Metal Building Systems Manual provides guidance for allowable drift due to wind loads for pre-engineered metal buildings, and serviceability recommendations for metal buildings can also be found in Chapter L of AISC 360 with additional guidance in AISC

Steel Design Guide 3

.

When separate support columns are used for top-running cranes, they must be supported so that differential movement between the crane columns and building columns, due to differences in stiffness, does not overstress either column and result in local column buckling.

B-1.2

Expansion Joints

Recommendations for the spacing of expansion joints can be found in NAS Technical

Report No. 65

.

B-2

B-2.1

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

Gable Bent Footings

Moment frame reactions from metal building gable bents have horizontal thrusts at

CANCELLED hairpin rebar may be used to transfer the thrust force from the column anchor bolts into the slab-on-ground reinforcement which acts as the tie between the columns. However, each of these methods requires close attention to detailing of control joints in the slab, isolation joints around a foundation pier and other possible interruptions in the continuous slab reinforcement between columns. Also, future renovation that might require trenching across the continuous slab reinforcement could result in the loss of the tension tie. A third method is to design the foundation for an overturning moment due to the thrust force at the base of the column. Each of these methods can provide the

31

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

necessary resistance to the thrust force, but need to be evaluated for each project condition. For further discussion on the design of foundations for gable bent reactions, refer to Metal Building Systems by Alexander Newman.

B-2.2

Footings on Expansive Soils

In the presence of expansive soils, footings must be designed to withstand expansive soil movement in order to prevent significant damage to structures. Cyclical expansive soil movement from soil water content, usually caused by a combination of inadequate drainage and seasonal wetting and drying cycles, are especially troublesome. Base the design on soil testing and recommendations by qualified geotechnical engineers.

Ensure soil investigations include estimates of settlement, heave, and recommendations to mitigate effects of expansive soil movement. Ensure positive drainage away from structures that will prevent ponding close to structures. Guidance on design of foundations on expansive soils can be found in UFC 3-220-03FA and UFC

3-220-01N.

B-3

B-3.1

CONCRETE

Slab-on-Ground Concrete Strength

For slabs-on-ground subject to forklift traffic, it is recommended that the minimum compressive strength for the concrete be 4,000 psi (27.6 MPa) for pneumatic tire traffic and 5,000 psi (34.5 MPa) for steel tire traffic.

B-3.2

Slab-on-Ground Control Joints

For slabs-on-ground it is recommended that the control joints align across the building floor plate to avoid joints ending abruptly along the length or width of a panel. Joints that end abruptly at an adjacent panel edge could cause a crack to propagate into the adjacent panel. For locations where placement of joints at a panel edge are unavoidable, refer to UFC 3-320-06A for additional reinforcement requirements to minimize crack propagation.

Location of control joints in slabs-on-ground need to be coordinated with the joints in hard-surface finishes to avoid having the control joint telegraph through the hardsurface finish.

B-3.3

CANCELLED

Slab-on-Ground Drying Shrinkage

Cracking in slabs generally results from drying shrinkage and restraint caused by friction between the slab and subgrade. Curling and warping occur due to differential shrinkage when the top of the slab dries to lower moisture content than the bottom of the slab.

Recommendations for reducing the effects of drying shrinkage can be found in ACI

360R, ACI 224R and ACI 302.1R. Shrinkage compensating concrete can also be used to reduce shrinkage cracking. See recommendations in ACI 223.

32

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

B-3.4

Slab-on-Ground Vapor Retarder/Barrier

To facilitate proper moisture control of a slab-on-ground to meet the moisture limits of water-based adhesives and durability during construction, it is recommended that the vapor retarder have a minimum thickness of 10 mil (250 µm) with a maximum permeance rating of 0.04 perm. Where moisture is a critical issue under the floor covering, such as wood floors, and a vapor barrier required, it is recommended to reduce the maximum permeance rating to 0.01 perm.

B-4

B-4.1

MASONRY

Masonry Veneer Base Detail

The base of the masonry veneer should be placed on a shelf angle or a foundation ledge that is lower than the base of the steel stud wall by at least 4 inches (102 mm).

The width of this shelf angle or foundation ledge will include the width of the masonry veneer and the cavity. This width should not be less than two-thirds of the veneer thickness plus the minimum air space.

B-5

B-5.1

STEEL

Shelf Angles for Masonry

Shelf angles should be hot-dip galvanized structural steel members. Angles should be provided in segments approximately 10 feet (3 m) in length, with gaps between segments. Shelf angles should be detailed to allow enough gaps for thermal expansion and contraction of the steel in angle runs and at building corners. Corners of buildings should have corner pieces with each leg no less than 4 feet (1.2 m) in length where possible.

Limit deflection of horizontal legs of shelf angles under masonry loading to 1/16 inch

(1.6 mm) at the end of the horizontal leg. Rotation of the shelf angle support should be included in the 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) deflection limit for the horizontal leg displacement calculation.

B-5.2

CANCELLED provide a vented deck to allow for the moisture in the concrete to escape through the deck.

33

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

B-5.3

Cold-Formed Continuous Beams and Joists

Guidance on determining the effective length of the unbraced compression flange for cold-formed continuous beams and joists can be found in AISI Effective Lengths for

Laterally Unbraced Compression Flanges of Continuous Beams Near Intermediate

Supports

.

B-5.4

Masonry Veneer/Steel Stud Wall Detailing

Recommended details for masonry veneer/steel stud wall assemblies can be found in

BIA Technical Note 28B.

Steel Structures in Corrosive Environments B-5.5

Steel structures designed for corrosive environments should include consideration of the following corrosion protection measures:

1) Box-shaped members should be designed so that all inside surfaces may be readily inspected, cleaned, and painted, or should be closed entirely, except when hot-dip galvanized, to prevent exposure to moisture.

2) The legs of two back-to-back angle members, when not in contact, should have a minimum separation of 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) to permit air circulation.

3) Pockets or depressions in horizontal members should have drain holes to prevent water from ponding in low areas. Positive drainage should be provided away from exposed steel. Column bases should be terminated on concrete curbs or piers above grade, and tops of curbs or piers should be pitched to drain.

4) Where extremely corrosive conditions exist, consideration should be given to providing cathodic protection in addition to protective coatings for steel members exposed to salt water moisture environments.

5) Structural members embedded in concrete and exterior railing, handrails, fences, guardrails, and anchor bolts should be galvanized or constructed of stainless steel.

6) Dissimilar metals, (e.g., aluminum and steel, stainless steel and carbon steel, zinc coated steel and uncoated steel) should be isolated by appropriate means to avoid the creation of galvanic cells which can occur when dissimilar metals come in contact.

CANCELLED

8) For increased serviceability and compatibility with fireproofing use galvanized steel deck in accordance with ASTM A653.

9) Note that some common grades of stainless alloy such as ASTM Type 306 or 316 are susceptible to corrosion when immersed in salt or brackish water.

Further guidance in designing steel structures in corrosive environments can be found in ASM Handbook Volume 13B.

34

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

B-5.6

Steel Structures in Arctic and Antarctic Zones

For carbon steel, the transition from ductile to brittle behavior occurs within temperatures to be expected in Arctic and Antarctic zones. Ductility is important for structures in high seismic areas. Toughness, a characteristic also affected by cold temperatures, is important for structures which could be subjected to cyclic or impact loadings. Design of structures which could be subjected to cyclic or impact loads in cold climates, should include consideration of the following measures to mitigate potential fatigue and fracture problems:

1) Provide ample fillets to avoid stress risers.

2) Use bolted joints whenever possible. If welded joints are used, take precautions to eliminate gas and impurities in welds. Proper preheating and post-cooling are essential.

3) Use low-carbon steels and nickel-alloy steel that have good toughness characteristics at low temperatures.

CANCELLED

35

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX C – ABBREVIATIONS

10/50 S

S

.

.... Spectral acceleration of 5% damped short period (0.2 second) response corresponding to an earthquake with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years

10/50 S

1

.

.... Spectral acceleration of 5% damped long period (1.0 second) response corresponding to an earthquake with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years

CS

............... Case Study

DOD

............ Department of Defense

%g

............... Percent Gravity

ft

2

................ Square Feet

in

2

................ Square Inches

IP

................. Inch-Pound

kg/m

3

.......... Kilograms per Cubic Meter

km/h

............ Kilometers per Hour

kN

................ Kilonewton

kN/m

2

.......... Kilonewton per Square Meter

kPa

.............. Kilopascal

lbs

............... Pounds

lb/ft

.............. Pounds per Foot

lb/ft

2 lb/in

2

CANCELLED

m

................. Meter

m

2

................ Square Meter

mil

............... 0.001 Inches

mm

.............. Millimeter

36

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011 mm

2

............ Square Millimeter

MPa

............. Megapascal

Mph

............. Miles per Hour

psf

............... Pounds per Square Foot

psi

............... Pounds per Square Inch

S

S

................ Spectral Accelerations for Short Periods as determined by IBC Section

1613.5.1

S

1

.........................

Spectral Accelerations for 1-Second Periods as determined by IBC

Section 1613.5.1

µm

............... micrometer (micron)

V

.................. Velocity

CANCELLED

37

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

\2\

APPENDIX D - MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS, L

MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS g o

, AND

D-1 REFERENCES.

All section references are to the International Building

Code (IBC) 2009. Table D-1 includes the IBC 2009 Table 1607.1 with additional

Occupancy or Use classification for military facilities that are shown in bold italics.

TABLE D-1 MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND MINIMUM

CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS g

OCCUPANCY OR USE UNIFORM CONCENTRATED

1. Access floor systems

Office use

Computer use

2. Ammunition Storage

High explosives (one story)

Inert explosives (one story)

Pyrotechnics (one story)

Small arms (one story)

Torpedo (one story)

3. Armories and drill rooms

4. Assembly areas and theaters

Fixed seats (fastened to floor)

Follow spot, projection and

control rooms

Lobbies

Movable seats

Stages and platforms

Other assembly areas

(kPa)

2.4

4.8

23.9

23.9

23.9

23.9

16.8

7.2

2.9

2.4

4.8

4.8

6.0

4.8

(psf)

50

100

500

500

500

500

350

150

60

50

100

100

125

100

5. Balconies (exterior) and decks

(Balconies serving as

primary means of egress

7. Boiler houses

8. Bowling alleys

9. Catwalks

10. Cleaning gear / trash room compactor

h

Same as occupancy served

9.6

3.6

1.9

3.6

---

200

75

40

75

---

---

1.33

---

(kN)

---

---

---

---

---

---

8.9

8.9

---

---

---

---

---

---

(lbs.)

---

---

---

---

---

---

2,000

2,000

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

300

---

11. Cold Storage (Food or provision freezer)

First floor

Upper floors

12. Command Duty Officer Day

room

19.2

14.4

2.9

400

300

60

---

---

---

---

---

---

38

OCCUPANCY OR USE

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

UNIFORM CONCENTRATED

13. Cornices

14. Corridors, except as otherwise indicated

15. Court rooms

16. Dance halls and ballrooms

17. Dining rooms and restaurants

18. Decks – (See Item 5.)

(kPa)

2.9

4.8

3.8

4.8

4.8

4.8

1.9

14.4

12.0

9.6

(psf)

60

100

80

100

100

100

40

300

250

200

(kN)

---

---

---

---

---

---

1.33

---

(lbs.)

---

---

---

---

---

---

300

19. Dwellings (see residential)

20. Elevator machine room grating

(on area of 2600 mm

2

(4 in.

2

))

21. Finish light floor plate construction

(on area of 650 mm

2

(1 in.

2

))

22. Fire escapes

On single-family dwellings only

23. Galleys

Dishwashing rooms

General kitchen area

Provision storage (not refrigerated)

Preparation room

---

---

---

---

---

--- 0.89

---

200

Meat

Washroom

35. Libraries

Reading rooms

Stack rooms

Corridors above first floor

12.0

2.9

7.2

b

3.8

250

Vegetable

24. Garages (passenger vehicles only)

Trucks & buses

4.8

1.9

See Section

1607.6 - IBC

100

40

See Section

1607.6 - IBC

Note a

See Section

1607.6 - IBC

Note a

See Section

1607.6 - IBC

25. Generator rooms

26. Grandstands (see stadium and arena bleachers)

27. Guard House

28. Gymnasiums, main floors and balconies

29. Handrails, guards and grab bars

30. Hospitals

Corridors above first floor

CANCELLED

33. Laboratories, normal scientific equipment

34. Latrines / Heads / Toilets /

9.6

---

3.6

4.8

See Section

1607.7 - IBC

3.8

2.9

1.9

---

6.0

3.6

200

---

75

100

See Section

1607.7 - IBC

80

60

40

---

125

75

---

---

---

---

See Section

1607.7 - IBC

4.45

4.45

4.45

---

---

---

See Section

1607.7 - IBC

1,000

1,000

1,000

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

60

150 b

80

4.45

4.45

4.45

1,000

1,000

1,000

---

---

39

OCCUPANCY OR USE

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

UNIFORM CONCENTRATED

36. Manufacturing

Light

Heavy

37. Marquees

38. Mechanical equipment room

(general)

39. Mechanical room (HVAC)

40. Mechanical telephone and radio equipment room

41. Morgue

42. Office buildings

File and computer rooms shall be designed for heavier loads based on anticipated occupancy

Lobbies and first floor corridors

Offices

Corridors above first floor

43. Penal Institutions

Cell blocks

Corridors

44. Post offices

General area

Work rooms

45. Power plants

46. Projection booths

47. Promenade roof

48. Pump houses

49. Recreation room

(kPa)

6.0

12.0

3.6

4.8

6.0

9.6

4.8

2.9

4.8

4.8

6.0

7.2

4.8

---

4.8

2.4

3.8

1.9

4.8

4.8

125

200

100

60

100

100

125

150

100

---

100

50

80

40

100

100

(psf)

125

250

75

100

---

---

---

---

---

---

7.2 150 ---

50. Receiving rooms (radio) including roof areas supporting antennas and electronic equipment

51. Refrigeration storage rooms

Dairy

Meat

Vegetable

9.6

12.0

200

250

---

---

CANCELLED

---

---

---

---

8.9

8.9

8.9

---

(kN)

8.9

13.34

---

---

(lbs.)

2,000

3,000

---

---

---

---

---

---

2,000

2,000

2,000

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

40

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

UNIFORM CONCENTRATED OCCUPANCY OR USE

52. Residential

One & two family dwellings

Uninhabitable attics without storage

Uninhabitable attics with limited storage

Habitable attics and sleeping areas

All other areas

Hotels and multifamily dwellings

Private rooms & corridors serving them

Corridors serving as primary means of egress to multiple private rooms

Public rooms and corridors serving them

53. Reviewing stands, grandstands and bleachers

54. Roofs

All roof surfaces subject to maintenance workers

Awnings and canopies

Fabric construction supported by a light weight rigid skeleton structure

All other construction

Ordinary flat, pitched, and curved roofs

Primary roof members, exposed to a work floor:

Single panel point of lower chord of roof trusses or any point along primary structural members supporting roofs: storage warehouses, and repair garages

All other occupancies

Roofs used for special purposes

Roofs used for promenade purposes

Roofs used for roof gardens or assembly purposes

(kPa)

0.5

1.0

1.4

1.9

1.9

3.8

4.8

Note c

---

0.23

Nonreduceable

1.0

1.0

---

---

Note l

2.9

4.8

(psf)

10

20

30

40

40

80

100

Note c

---

5

Nonreduceable

20

20

---

Note l

60

(kN)

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Note c

1.33

---

---

---

CANCELLED

55. Schools

Classrooms

Corridors above first floor

First floor corridors

56. Scuttles, skylight ribs, and accessible ceilings

1.9

3.8

4.8

---

100

40

80

100

---

---

4.45

4.45

4.45

0.89

---

(lbs.)

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Note c

300

---

---

---

2000

300

Note l

---

1,000

1,000

1,000

200

41

OCCUPANCY OR USE

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

UNIFORM CONCENTRATED

57. Shops: Manufacturing and

Industrial

Aircraft utility

Assembly and repair

(kPa)

9.6

12.0

(psf)

200

250

(kN)

---

---

(lbs.)

---

---

6.0

6.0

14.4

125

125

300

---

---

---

---

---

---

Bombsight (w/o shielding)

Carpenter

Electrical

300

250 d

100

100

60

40 c c

100

125

250

200

---

35.6

e

---

8,000 e

Engine overhaul

58. Sidewalks, vehicular driveways and yards, subject to trucking

59. Skating rinks

60. Stadiums and arenas

Bleachers

Fixed seats (fastened to floor)

61. Stairs and exits

One- and two-family dwellings

All other

62. Storage warehouses (shall be designed for heavier loads if required for anticipate storage)

General

Light

Heavy

Aircraft

Building Materials

14.4

12.0

d

4.8

4.8

c

2.9

c

1.9

4.8

6.0

11.97

9.58

---

---

Note f

---

---

---

Note f

---

11.97 250

Drugs, paint, oil

9.58 200

Dry Provisions

14.36 300

Groceries, wine, Liquor

14.36 300

Light Tools

7.2 150

Pipe & metal

47.88 1000

Paint and oil (one story)

Hardware

63. Stores

Retail

First floor

Upper floors

Wholesale, all floors

64. Tailor shop

CANCELLED

67. Walkways and elevated platforms

(other than exit ways)

23.94

14.36

4.8

3.6

6.0

1607.7.3 - IBC

2.9

500

300

100

75

125

1607.7.3 - IBC

60

4.45

4.45

1607.7.3 -

IBC

---

1,000

1,000

1,000

---

2000

See Section

1607.7.3 - IBC

---

4.1

4.8

85

100

/2/

Pedestrian Bridges

68. Yards and terraces, pedestrian --- ---

42

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Notes to Table D-1, “MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND

MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS”

For SI: 1 square inch = 645.16 mm

2

, 1 pound per square foot = 0.0479 kN/m

.

2

= 0.0479 kPa

, 1 pound = 0.004448 kN, 1 pound per cubic foot = 16 kg/m

3 a. \2\ Floors in garages or portions of building used for the storage of motor vehicles shall be designed for the uniformly distributed live loads of Table 1607.1 or the following concentrated loads: (1) for garages restricted to passenger vehicles accommodating not more than nine passengers, 3,000 pounds (13.34 kN) acting on an area of 4.5 inches x 4.5 inches (114 mm x 114 mm); (2) for mechanical parking structures without slab or deck which are used for storing passenger vehicles only,

2,250 pounds (10.0 kN) per wheel. /2/ b. The loading applies to stack room floors that support non-mobile, double-faced library book stacks, subject to the following limitations:

1) The nominal book stack unit height shall not exceed 90 inches (2,290mm).

2) The nominal shelf depth shall not exceed 12 inches (305mm) for each face; and

3) Parallel rows of double-faced book stacks shall be separated by aisles not less than 36 inches (915 mm) wide. c. Design in accordance with the ICC Standard on Bleachers, Folding and Telescoping

Seating and Grandstands

. d. Other uniform loads in accordance with an approved method which contains provisions for truck loadings shall also be considered where appropriate. f. Minimum concentrated load on stair treads (on area of 4 square inches (2,600 mm is 300 pounds (1.3 kN). e. \2\ The concentrated wheel load shall be applied on an area of 4.5 inches by 4.5 inches (114mm x 114mm). /2/

CANCELLED g. Where snow loads occur that are in excess of the design conditions, the structure shall be designed to support the loads due to the increased loads caused by drift buildup or a greater snow design determined by the building official. (See IBC

Section 1608). For special-purpose roofs, see IBC Section 1607.11.2.2.

2

)) h. See IBC Section 1604.8.3 for decks attached to exterior walls.

43

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

i. Attics without storage are those where the maximum clear height between the joist and rafter is less than 42 inches (1067 mm), or where there are not two or more adjacent trusses with the same web configuration capable of containing a rectangle

42 inches (1067 mm) high by 2 feet (610 mm) wide, or greater, located within the plane of the truss. For attics without storage, this live load need not be assumed to act concurrently with any other live load requirements. j. For attics with limited storage and constructed with trusses, this live load need only be applied to those portions of the bottom chord where there are two or more adjacent trusses with the same web configuration capable of containing a rectangle

42 inches (1067 mm) high by 2 feet (610 mm) wide or greater, located within the plane of the truss. The rectangle shall fit between the top of the bottom chord and the bottom of any other truss member, provided that each of the following criteria is met:

1) The attic area is accessible by a pull-down stairway or framed opening in accordance with Section 1209.2, and

2) The truss shall have a bottom chord pitch less than 2:12

3) Bottom chords of trusses shall be designed for the greater of actual imposed dead load or 10 psf (0.5 kPa), uniformly distributed over the entire span. k. Attic spaces served by a fixed stair shall be signed to support the minimum live load specified for habitable attics and sleeping rooms. l. Roofs used for other special purposes shall be designed for appropriate loads as approved by the contracting officer, or the contracting officer’s designated representative.

CANCELLED

44

Alaska

Arizona

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX E - SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES,

ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

E-1 Climatic

Loading Data Table. Site-specific structural climatic loading data for DoD locations within the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table E-1.

E-2 Earthquake Loading Data Table.

Site-specific earthquake loading data for DoD locations within the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in f

E-2.

TABLE E-1 - STRUCTURAL CLIMATIC LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES, ITS

TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

TABLE E-1

State

Alabama

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Base / City

Anniston Army

Depot

Birmingham

Fort McClellan

Fort Rucker

(psf) (mph) (inches)

5

5

5

0

90

90

90

107

6

6

6

0

(kPa) (km/h)

0.24 145

0.24 145

0.24 145

0.00 172

(mm)

152

152

152

0

Maxwell-Gunther

AFB / Montgomery

Fort Huachuca

5

Mobile

Redstone Arsenal /

Huntsville

Clear AS

Eielson AFB

Elmendorf AFB

Fort Greely

Fort Richardson

Fort Wainwright

Galena AFB

Juneau

Ketchikan

Kodiak

Sitka

Valdez

Davis-Monthan

AFB / Tucson AFB

0

10

60

60

50

60

50

60

60

60

30

50

160

0

130

90

90

0

9

0.00 209

0.48 145

2.87 145

90 permafrost 2.87 145 permafrost

100 129 2.40 161

90 Permafrost 2.87 145 permafrost

110 129 2.40 177

90 permafrost 2.87 145 permafrost

100

105

115

130

122

100

90

86

86

56

136

0

2.87 161

2.87 169

0.00 185

1.44 209

2.40

7.66

0.00

196

161

145

0

229

3277

3277

2184

2184

1422

3454

0

10

97

90

4

0

0.24

0.48

156

145

102

0

45

State

Arizona

Arkansas

California

TABLE E-1

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Base / City

Luke Air Force

Base

Phoenix

MCAS Yuma

Yuma Proving

Ground

Little Rock AFB

Pine Bluff Arsenal

Alameda

MCLB Barstow

Beale AFB

MCMWTC

Bridgeport

MCB Camp

Pendleton

NWS China Lake

NSWC Corona

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

(psf) (mph) (inches) (kPa) (km/h) (mm)

0

0

0

0

10

10

0

0

0

150

0

0

0

90

90

90

90

90

90

85

85

85

100

85

85

Special

85

5

0

0

0

14

9

18

36

4

22

0

0.00

0.00

7.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

145

0.00 145

0.00 145

0.00 145

0.48 145

0.48 145

0.00 137

0.00 137

137

161

137

127

0

0

0

356

229

457

914

102

137

Special 559

137 0

NRTF Dixon

0 85 0 0.00 137 0

Edwards AFB

El Centro NAF

Fort Irwin

Fresno ANG

0

0

0

0

85

Special

85

85

85

22

0

22

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

137

Special

137

137

137

559

0

559

0

NAS Lemoore

Los Angeles AFB /

El Segundo

Los Angeles

0

0

0

0

85

85

85

85

0

0

0

0

0.00 137

0.00 137

0.00 137

0.00 137

0

0

0

0

March ARB

McClellan AFB /

Sacramento

NWC Mohave

Range

Presidio of

Monterey

0

0

0

85

85

85

5

22

4

0.00

0.00

0.00

137

137

137

127

559

102

Point Mugu / Port

Hueneme

0 85 0 0.00 137 0

46

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

State

California

Base / City

San Diego Region

NAS North Island

NAB Coronada

MCRD

MCAS Miramar

Naval Medical Ctr

San Diego NS

Point Loma

Moffett Field -

Onizuka /

Sunnyvale

San Clemente

Island Naval

Reservation

(psf)

0

0

0

(mph)

85

85

85

(inches)

0

0

0

(kPa)

0.00

0.00

0.00

(km/h)

137

137

137

(mm)

0

0

0

Colorado

San Nicolas Island

0

Seal Beach NWS

Seal Beach NWS –

Concord

Detachment

0

0

85

85

85

0

0

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

137

137

137

0

0

0

Sierra Army Depot /

Herlong

Stockton / San

Joaquin

Travis AFB

MCB Twentynine

Palms

15

0

0

0

85

85

85

85

54

4

0

5

0.72

0.00

0.00

0.00

137

137

137

137

1372

102

0

127

Vandenberg AFB

Buckley AFB /

Aurora

Fort Carson

Cheyenne

Mountain AS /

NORAD

0

Denver

20

20

15

90

90

90

Special

52

52

38

0.96 145

0.96 145

0.72

145

Special

1321

1321

965

15

85

90

Special

0

38

0.00

0.72

137

145

Special

0

965

Peterson AFB /

Colorado Springs

Schriever AFB

USAF Academy

Connecticut

NSB New London /

Groton

30

CS

30

30

90

90

90

Special

120

38

38

38

1.44

CS

1.44

1.44

145

145

145

Special

193

965

965

965

47

Georgia

TABLE E-1

State

Delaware

District of

Columbia

Florida

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Base / City

Dover AFB

Washington

Region

Bolling AFB

Anacostia NS

Fort McNair

Marine Barracks

NRL Washington

NDW / Anacostia

Pentagon

Walter Reed

Avon Park AS

Cape Canaveral

AFS

Eglin AFB

Homestead

Hurlburt Field

NAS Jacksonville /

MCSF Blount Island /

Jacksonville

NAS Key West

MacDill AFB

NAS Mayport

HQ Southcom /

Miami

(psf) (mph) (inches)

25

25

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

95

90

110

125

133

150

135

115

150

120

120

140

22

26

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(kPa)

1.20

1.20

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

(km/h)

153

145

177

201

214

241

217

185

241

193

193

225

(mm)

559

660

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Orlando

0 108 0 0.00 174 0

NAS Panama City

Patrick AFB

NAS Pensacola

Tampa

0

0

0

0

130

125

140

118

0

0

0

0

0.00 209

0.00 201

0.00 225

0.00 190

0

0

0

0

Tyndall AFB

NAS Whiting Field /

Milton

MCLB Albany

Athens NCSC

Dobbins AFB /

Atlanta NAS

Fort Benning

Fort Gordon

0

0

0

5

5

5

10

130

125

98

90

90

95

93

0

0

0

0

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.24

0.24

0.48

209

201

158

145

145

153

150

0

0

0

0

0

48

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

State

Georgia

Hawaii

TABLE E-1

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Base / City

Fort McPherson /

Fort Gillem

(psf)

5

(mph)

90

(inches) (kPa)

0.24

(km/h)

145

(mm)

Fort Stewart

Hunter Army

0

Airfield / Savannah

0

NSB Kings Bay

Moody AFB

Robins AFB

PMRF Barking

Sands, Kauai

MCBH Kaneohe

Bay

Pohakuloa Training

Area

Pearl Harbor

Region:

Camp H.M. Smith

Fort Shafter

Hickam AFB

Pearl Harbor

Tripler AMC

Wahiawa Region:

Lualualei

Wahiawa Naval

Reservation

Wheeler AFB

Schofield Barracks

ARD Bayview

Boise ANG

Mountain Home

AFB

Fort Sheridan /

Chicago

Great Lakes

Rock Island

Arsenal

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

25

20

110

120

120

98

92

105

105

105

105

105

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

10

20

25

90

90

90

90

64

59

0.48 145

0.48 145

0.96 145

1.20 145

1626

1499

90

90

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

64

64

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.00

0.00

0

0.00

0.00

1.20

0.96

177

193

193

158

148

169

169

169

169

169

145

145

1626

1626

Scott AFB

Springfield

Crane NWSC

Grissom ARB

20

20

20

20

90

90

90

90

38

36

49

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

145

145

145

145

965

914

1245

49

Maine

Maryland

TABLE E-1

State

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Base / City

Fort Benjamin

Harrison /

Indianapolis

Des Moines

Fort Leavenworth

(psf)

20

25

20

(mph)

90

90

90

(inches)

44

82

54

(kPa)

0.96

1.20

0.96

(km/h)

145

145

145

(mm)

1118

2083

1372

Fort Riley

McConnell AFB

Fort Campbell

Fort Knox

Louisville

Richmond

20

25

15

15

15

15

90

90

90

90

90

90

52

38

22

32

32

0.96

1.20

0.72

0.72

0.72

0.72

145

145

145

145

145

145

1321

965

559

813

813

0

Barksdale AFB

5

Fort Polk / Leesville

5

NAS JRB New

Orleans / Belle

Chasse

NAS Brunswick

0

50

NRTF Cutler

50

90

95

130

100

98

7

0

0

86

86

0.24

0.24

0.00

2.40

2.40

145

153

209

161

158

178

0

0

2184

2184

PNSY Kittery

Winter Harbor

NSGA

Aberdeen Proving

Ground

50

50

25

\2\ 1220 /2/

2184

737

Adelphi

25 90 24 1.20 145 610

Andrews AFB

Carderock NSWC /

Bethesda

Bloods Island

25

25

20

90

90

102

26

20

1.20 145

1.20 145

0.96 164

660

508

Edgewood Arsenal

25

Fort Detrick /

Fredrick

30

100

98

90

90

90

\2\ 48 /2/

86

29

29

29

2.40

2.40

1.20

1.20

1.44

161

158

145

145

145

737

737

Fort Meade

25

Indian Head NSWC 25

Martin State ANG

NS Pax River ,

Webster Field / St.

Inigoes

25

20

90

90

90

90

26

22

29

26

1.20

1.20

1.20

0.96

145

145

145

145

660

559

737

660

50

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

State

Maryland

Base / City

U.S Naval

Academy /

Annapolis

(psf)

25

Massachusetts

Fort Devens / Ayer

50

(mph)

90

97

(inches)

26

64

Hanscom AFB

50 100 54

Natick

Otis AGB /

Falmouth

50

25

100

115 38

(kPa)

1.20

2.40

2.40

2.40

1.20

(km/h)

145

156

161

161

185

(mm)

660

1626

1372

965

Westover ARB

Michigan

Battle Creek

Detroit Arsenal /

Warren

Selfridge ANG

Minnesota

Base

Minneapolis – St

Paul

Mississippi

Stennis / Bay St.

Louis

Columbus AFB

Gulfport

Jackson

Keesler AFB

NAS Meridian

Pascagoula NS

Missouri

Montana

35

30

25

25

50

0

10

0

5

0

5

0

95

90

90

90

90

130

90

135

92

140

97

150

64

61

59

125

7

0

5

0

5

0

1.68

1.44

1.20

1.20

2.40

0.00

0.48

0.00

0.24

0.00

0.24

0.00

153

145

145

145

145

209

145

217

148

225

156

241

1626

1549

1499

3175

178

0

127

0

127

0

Vicksburg

Fort Leonard Wood 20

Kansas City

Overland

5

20

20

90

90

90

90

36

49

0.24 145

0.96 145

0.96 145

0.96 145

914

1245

St. Louis

Whiteman AFB

Great Falls ANG

20

20

20

90

90

90

38

46

107

0.96

0.96

0.96

145

145

145

965

1168

2718

90 107 0.96 145 2718

Nebraska

Nevada

Malmstrom AFB

20

Offutt AFB

Lincoln

Nellis AFB

25

25

NAS Fallon

5

Indian Springs AFS

5

5

90

90

90

90

90

73

64

23

7

7

1.20

1.20

0.24

0.24

0.24

145

145

145

145

145

1854

1626

584

178

178

51

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

State Base / City

Nevada

New

Hampshire

Nellis AF Range

Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard

New Jersey

NWS Earle / Colts

Neck

Fort Dix / Trenton

Fort Monmouth

New Mexico

Lakehurst

McGuire AFB

Picatinny Arsenal

Albuquerque

Cannon AFB

Holloman AFB

New York

Kirtland AFB

White Sands

Buffalo

Fort Drum

Fort Hamilton /

Brooklyn

(psf)

5

50

20

25

20

25

25

35

10

15

5

10

5

45

70

25

(mph)

90

100

110

105

110

105

105

90

90

90

90

(a)

90

90

90

105

(inches)

7

\2\ 48 /2/

29

38

29

29

32

18

18

4

18

4

59

94

(kPa)

0.24

2.40

0.96

1.20

0.96

1.20

1.20

1.68

0.48

0.72

0.24

0.48

0.24

2.16

3.35

1.20

(km/h)

145

161

177

169

177

169

169

145

145

145

145

(a)

145

145

145

169

(mm)

178

\2\ 1220 /2/

737

965

737

737

813

457

457

102

457

102

1499

2388

Griffis AFB / Rome

60

NIAGARA FALLS

IAP

NSU Saratoga

35

Springs

Stewart ANG /

Newburgh

Syracuse

West Point

Watervliet Arsenal /

Albany

50

35

40

30

40

90

90

90

90

90

90

Special

90

86

59

54

73

54

82

2.87

1.68

2.40 145

1.68 145

1.92 145

1.44

1.92

145

145

145

Special

145

2184

1499

1372

1854

1372

2083

North Carolina MCAS Cherry Point 10

Fort Bragg

10

128

95

0

0

0.48

0.48

206

153

0

0

Jacksonville

Region

MCB Camp Lejeune

MCAS New River

Pope AFB

10

10

130

95

0

0

0.48

0.48

209

153

0

0

52

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

State Base / City (psf) (mph) (inches) (kPa) (km/h) (mm)

North Carolina

Raleigh

Seymour Johnson

AFB

North Dakota

15

10

Grand Forks AFB

60

NRTF La Moure

40

Minot AFB

40

93

100

90

90

90

4

156

163

0.72

0.48

2.87

1.92

1.92

150

161

145

145

145

102

3962

4140

Ohio

Oklahoma

Cleveland

DSC Whitehall /

Columbus

Wright-Patterson

AFB

Youngstown ARS /

Vienna

Altus AFB

20

20

20

20

10

Fort Sill

McAlester Army

Oklahoma City

10

Ammunition Plant

10

Tinker AFB /

10

Rhode Island

NS Newport

South Carolina

MCAS Beaufort

30

5

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

115

122

52

46

49

14

14

16

17

35

0

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.96

0.48

0.48

0.48

0.48

1.44

0.24

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

1321

1168

1245

356

356

406

432

Tulsa

Vance AFB

Oregon

Portland

Pennsylvania

ARS Coraopolis /

Pittsburg

10

15

10

25

90

90

85

90

23

22

14

38

0.48

0.72

0.48

1.20

145

145

137

145

584

559

356

965

Carlisle Barracks

Fort Indiantown

Gap / Annville

Letterkenny /

Chambersburg

Mechanicsburg

25

35

30

25

90

90

90

90

36

49

36

1.20

1.20

145

1.68 145

1.44 145

145

914

1245

914

Philadelphia

New Cumberland /

Defense Depot

Susquehanna

Tobyhanna Army

Depot

Willow Grove ARS /

NAS

25

25

50

30

90

90

90

90

30

52

1.20

1.20

2.40

1.44

145

145

145

145

762

0

0

185

196

889

0

53

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

State Base / City (psf) (mph) (inches) (kPa) (km/h) (mm)

South Carolina Charleston

Region:

Charletion AFB

NWS Charleston

Columbia Region:

McEntire

Fort Jackson

Shaw AFB

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

5

10

MCRD Parris Island 0

Ellsworth AFB

20

Arnold AFB

NSWC LCC /

Memphis

NSA Mid-South /

Millington

Nashville

NAS JRB, Carswell

/ Fort Worth

10

10

10

10

5

NAS Corpus Christi 0

Dallas / Irving

Dyess AFB

Ellington ANG /

Houston

5

5

0

Fort Bliss / El Paso

5

125

97

125

90

90

90

90

90

90

130

90

90

115

90

0

0

0

86

0

22

7

0

7

7

0

0

0.24

0.48

0.00

0.96

0.48

0.48

0.48

0.48

0.24

0.00

0.24

0.24

0.00

0.24

201

156

201

145

145

145

145

145

145

209

145

145

185

145

0

0

0

2184

0

559

178

0

178

178

0

0

Fort Hood / Killeen

5

Goodfellow AFB

NS Ingleside

NAS Kingsville

Laughlin AFB

Red River Army

5

0

0

0

Depot / Texarkana

5

90

130

115

90

90

5

0

0

0

8

0.24 145

0.00 209

0.00 185

0.00

0.24

145

145

127

0

0

0

203

San Antonio

Region

Brooks AFB

Fort Sam Houston

Kelly AFB

Lackland AFB

Randolph AFB

5 90 0 0.24 145 0

Sheppard AFB

5

90

90

6

11

0.24

0.24

145

145

152

279

54

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

State

Utah

Virginia

TABLE E-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

(kPa) (km/h) Base / City

Dugway Proving

Ground

Hill AFB

Salt Lake City

(psf) (mph) (inches)

10

40

15

90

90

90

54

73

59

0.48 145

1.92 145

0.72 145

Tooele Army Depot 25

Dahlgren

Dam Neck / Virginia

25

Beach Ocean front

10

Fort A. P. Hill

25

Fort Belvoir

Fort Eustis

Fort Lee

Fort Monroe

Fort Myer

Fort Story

Henderson Hall /

Arlington

Langley AFB /

Hampton

NAB Little Creek

25

15

20

10

25

10

25

10

10

90

90

115

90

90

97

90

105

90

113

90

105

110

52

5

26

9

14

9

26

9

26

9

9

1.20 145

1.20 145

0.48 185

1.20 145

1.20 145

0.72 156

0.96 145

0.48 169

1.20 145

0.48 182

1.20 145

0.48 169

0.48 177

107 9 0.48 172

Norfolk Region:

Camp Elmore

Craney Island

Depot

10

Norfolk Naval Base

Norfolk Shipyard –

Naval Hospital /

CANCELLED

MCB Quantico

Radford AAP

Defense Supply Ctr

/ Richmond

10

25

25

20

113

90

90

90

9

22

18

0.48 182

1.20 145

1.20 145

0.96 145

229

229

229

559

457

229

Wallops Island

20 115 0.96 185

1321

127

660

229

356

229

660

229

660

229

229

1372

1854

(mm)

1499

55

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

State

Virginia

Base / City

Yorktown Region:

Camp Perry

Cheatham Annex

Yorktown NWS

Washington

NS Everett

Fairchild AFB

Fort Lewis /

Tacoma

(psf) (mph) (inches)

15

15 (b) 85

42

95

85

15 (b) 85

Indian Island SWC 15 (b)

85

NRS Jim Creek

Keyport / Bangor

Engin. Sta Annex

15 (b)

85

15 (b) 85

McChord AFB

15

85

Puget Sound

Region:

Bangor NSB

Bremerton NS

Puget Sound NSY

NAS Whidbey

Island / Oak Harbor

15 (b)

15 (b)

85

85

9

64

9

9

9

9

(kPa)

0.72(b)

0.72(b)

0.72

0.72(b)

0.72(b)

(km/h)

0.72 153

0.72(b) 137

2.01 137

0.72(b) 137

137

0.72(b)

137

137

137

137

137

(mm)

229

1626

229

229

229

229

Seattle

West Virginia

Allegheny Ballistics

Lab

15

CS

Beckley

30

Huntington

20

Sugar Grove NRS

30

85

90

90

90

90

Wisconsin

9

22

38

0.72

CS

137

145

1.44 145

0.96 145

1.44 145

229

559

965

Fort McCoy

General Mitchell

40

AFRC / Milwaukee

30

Madison

30

90

90

90

114

75

75

1.92 145

1.44 145

1.44 145

2896

1905

1905

Wyoming

American

Samoa

F. E. Warren AFB

20

Pago Pago / Tutuila

Island

0

90

125

59

0

0.96 145

0.00 201

1499

0

Mariana

Islands

Puerto Rico

Guam

Saipan / Tinian

All

0

0

0

170

150

145

0

0

0

0.00 274

0.00 241

0.00 233

0

0

0

56

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Notes to TABLE E-1, “STRUCTURAL CLIMATIC LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES,

ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS”

(a) – Wind speed equals 125 mph (201 km/h) in the south sector of Kirtland AFB. Wind speed equals 100 mph (161 km/h) on the remainder of the base.

(b) – Ground snow load to be used for Navy facilities at identified locations in Washington

State equals 25 psf (1.20 kPa).

CS – Site specific case studies are required to establish ground snow loads.

Special - Special wind regions where unusual geographic conditions require consideration for potential unusual wind conditions. The wind speeds shown are minimum values. The potential for higher wind speeds due to unusual geographic conditions should also be considered.

CANCELLED

57

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES, ITS

TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

TABLE E-2

State

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

Base / City

S

S

(%g)

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

S

(%g)

10/50 S

1

(%g)

Anniston Army Depot

Birmingham

Fort McClellan

28

30

28

9

10

9

11

11

11

4

4

4

Fort Rucker

Maxwell-Gunther AFB /

Montgomery

11

16

6

7

4

6

2

3

Mobile

12 5 4 2

Redstone Arsenal /

Huntsville

Clear AS

Eielson AFB

Elmendorf AFB

Fort Greely

Fort Richardson

Fort Wainwright

Galena AFB

Juneau

Ketchikan

Kodiak

Sitka

30

108

106

149

81

152

111

35

57

23

179

102

11

30

29

55

38

57

31

10

27

14

66

52

11

47

44

100

34

101

49

15

27

11

116

52

4

14

14

30

14

31

14

4

14

8

37

31

Valdez

Davis-Monthan AFB /

Tucson AFB

147 57 93 30

Fort Huachuca

Luke Air Force Base

Phoenix

28

26

17

18

8

8

6

6

13

12

11

11

4

3

3

3

MCAS Yuma

68 26 37 14

47 Max 23 Max 29 Max 11 Max

Yuma Proving Ground

20 Min 14 Min 15 Min 6 Min

Little Rock AFB

Pine Bluff Arsenal

Alameda

MCLB Barstow

Beale AFB

57

44

150

133

44

18

15

60

48

20

14

11

123

61

26

4

4

55

22

11

58

State

California

TABLE E-2

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Base / City

MCMWTC Bridgeport

MCB Camp Pendleton

NWS China Lake

NSWC Corona

NRTF Dixon

Edwards AFB

El Centro NAF

Fort Irwin

Fresno ANG

NAS Lemoore

Los Angeles AFB / El

Segundo

Los Angeles

March ARB

McClellan AFB /

Sacremento

NWC Mohave Range

Presidio of Monterey

Point Mugu / Port

Hueneme

San Diego Region

NAS North Island

NAB Coronada

MCRD

MCAS Miramar

Naval Medical Ctr

San Diego NS

NS Point Loma

Moffett Field – Onizuka /

Sunnyvale

San Clemente Island

Naval Reservation

59

150

83

S

S

(%g)

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

(%g)

S

10/50 S

1

(%g)

21 110

139 Max

111 Min

136 Max

109 Min

169

129

115 Max

86 Min

190 Max

150 Min

197 Max

78 Min

49

89

39

51 Max

42 Min

45 Max

38 Min

60

42

59 Max

39 Min

66 Max

60 Min

95 Max

29 Min

22

63

61

80 Max

61 Min

127

85 Max

47 Min

160 Max

128 Min

144 Max

40 Min

27

33 49

25

27 Max

19 Min

47

39 Max

21 Min

54 Max

39 Min

55 Max

15 Min

12

20

150

188

150

60

68

60

113

119

127

39

42

50

48

197 Max

94 Min

22

95 Max

33 Min

28

106 Max

49 Min

13

36 Max

20 Min

151

219

146

157

163

137

155

140

63

91

56

63

65

51

60

54

105

128

66.4

62.8

67.5

64.8

63.4

60.8

37

54

24.8

22.8

25.4

24.1

24.3

22.2

154 61 72.5 26.1

60

26

125

31

57

12

TABLE E-2

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

State

California

S

S

(%g)

62

S

1

(%g)

22

10/50 S

S

(%g)

26

10/50 S

1

(%g) Base / City

San Nicolas Island

Seal Beach NWS

Seal Beach NWS –

Concord Detachment

Sierra Army Depot /

Herlong

Stockton / San Joaquin

164

150

95

148

61

60

35

48

110

145

48

76

186 60 111

Travis AFB

162 Max

88 Min

58 Max

30 Min

102 Max

39 Min

32 Max

14 Min

MCB Twentynine Palms

Colorado

138 Max

105 Min

20

49 Max

36 Min

5

64 Max

53 Min

7

24 Max

19 Min

Vandenberg AFB

Buckley AFB / Aurora

Denver

Fort Carson

Cheyenne Mountain AS /

NORAD

Peterson AFB / Colorado

Springs

21

21

21

20

6

6

6

6

8

7

7

7

Homestead

Hurlburt Field

19

5

6

2

7

Schriever AFB

District of

Columbia

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

22

21

6

6

8

8

USAF Academy

NSB New London / Groton

16 5 7

Dover AFB

Washington Region

Bolling AFB

Anacostia NS

CANCELLED

Walter Reed

5 6

Avon Park AS

8 3 2

2

1

2

Cape Canaveral AFS

Eglin AFB

9

10

4

5

3

3

1

2

2

3

1

2

0

9 5 3 2

2

2

2

2

2

37

37

55

16

26

10

60

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2

Hawaii

State

Florida

Georgia

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

S

S

Base / City (%g)

NAS Jacksonville / MCSF

Blount Island / Jacksonville

14

NAS Key West

MacDill AFB

3

7

NAS Mayport

HQ Southcom / Miami

Orlando

NAS Panama City

Patrick AFB

NAS Pensacola

Tampa

15

5

10

8

8

10

8

S

(%g)

6

1

3

6

2

4

5

4

5

3

1

10/50 S

(%g)

5

2

5

1

3

3

2

3

2

S

10/50 S

(%g)

2

1

2

1

1

2

1

2

1

Tyndall AFB

NAS Whiting Field / Milton

MCLB Albany

Athens NCSC

Dobbins AFB / Atlanta

NAS

Fort Benning

Fort Gordon

Fort McPherson / Fort

Gillem

8

11

13

26

25

15

33

22

4

5

6

9

9

7

11

9

3

4

5

12

11

6

14

10

2

2

3

5

4

3

5

4

Fort Stewart

Hunter Army Airfield /

Savannah

29 10 9 4

NSB Kings Bay

Moody AFB

Robins AFB

38

17

13

19

12

7

6

8

12

6

5

8

4

3

3

4

PMRF Barking Sands,

Kauai

19 6 8 2

MCBH Kaneohe Bay

63 18

30 8

1

Pearl Harbor Region:

Camp H.M. Smith

Fort Shafter

Hickam AFB

Pearl Harbor

Tripler AMC

61 18 29 8

61

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2

Base / City

S

S

(%g)

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

(%g)

S

10/50 S

1

(%g) State

Hawaii

Pohakuloa Training Area 150 60

Maine

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Wahiawa Region:

Lualualei

Wahiawa Naval Res

Wheeler AFB

Schofield Barracks

ARD Bayview

59 17 28

42 12 17

Boise ANG

Mountain Home AFB

Fort Sheridan / Chicago

30

26

15

10

9

6

16

14

5

14

13

5

6

5

5

Great Lakes

Rock Island Arsenal

Scott AFB

Springfield

Crane NWSC

Grissom ARB

Fort Benjamin Harrison /

Indianapolis

Des Moines

Fort Leavenworth

Fort Riley

McConnell AFB

66

27

35

15

18

8

13

19

14

19

11

12

7

8

4

6

5

5

24

10

13

6

7

3

4

6

5

Fort Campbell

Fort Knox

Louisville

Richmond

Barksdale AFB

Fort Polk / Leesville

NAS JRB New Orleans /

Belle Chasse

74 Max

59 Min

26

25

23

16

12

11

22 Max

19 Min

11

10

9

7

5

5

24 Max

18 Min

10

10

10

5

4

4

6 Max

6 Min

CANCELLED

4

4

4

2

2

1

NAS Brunswick

NRTF Cutler

PNSY Kittery

Winter Harbour NSGA

30

27

8

7

12 4

36

21

8

6

13

8

4

3

6

4

4

3

3

1

2

2

2

2

2

5

4

2

5

8

62

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

State

Maryland

Massachusetts

Base / City

Aberdeen Proving Ground

Adelphi

Andrews AFB

Carderock NSWC /

Bethesda

Bloods Island

Edgewood Arsenal

Fort Detrick / Fredrick

Fort Meade

Indian Head NSWC

Martin State ANG

NS Pax River , Webster

Field / St. Inigoes

U.S Naval Academy /

Annapolis

Fort Devens / Ayer

Hanscom AFB

S

S

(%g)

20

16

15

16

12

19

16

16

16

18

14

16

28

28

S

1

(%g)

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

7

7

10/50 S

(%g)

8

6

6

6

5

7

7

6

7

7

6

6

11

11

S

10/50 S

(%g)

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

Natick

Otis AGB / Falmouth

Westover ARB

26

20

23

7

5

7

10

8

9

3

2

3

Michigan

Battle Creek

11 5 4 2

2

2

Minnesota

Mississippi

Minneapolis – St Paul

Stennis / Bay St. Louis

Columbus AFB

Gulfport

6

12

28

12

3

5

11

5

2

4

8

4

1

2

4

2

Jackson

Keesler AFB

20

12

9

5

6

4

3

2

Detroit Arsenal / Warren

Selfridge ANG Base

NAS Meridian

Pascagoula NS

12

11

20

11

4

4

8

5

4

4

7

4

3

2

20 9 6 3

Missouri

Vicksburg

Fort Leonard Wood

Kansas City

Overland

30

13

52

12

6

16

10

4

19

4

2

5

1

63

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

State

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

Base / City

St. Louis

Whiteman AFB

Great Falls ANG

Malmstrom AFB

Offutt AFB

Lincoln

NAS Fallon

S

S

(%g)

58

14

23

20

13

18

81

S

(%g)

17

7

8

8

4

5

1

29

10/50 S

(%g)

21

5

13

12

4

5

43

S

10/50 S

(%g)

6

2

4

4

1

2

14

1

Indian Springs AFS

Nellis AFB

45

50

16

17

24

26

8

9

Nellis AF Range

New Hampshire

Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard

New Jersey

NWS Earle / Colts Neck

Fort Dix / Trenton

Fort Monmouth

New Mexico

New York

70Max

59 Min

36

30

26

30

26 Max

19 Min

8

6

6

6

37 Max

28 Min

13

11

10

11

13 Max

9 Min

4

3

3

3

Lakehurst

McGuire AFB

Picatinny Arsenal

Albuquerque

25

26

32

55

6

6

7

17

10

10

12

27

Cannon AFB

Holloman AFB

11

32

3

10

4

13

1

4

Kirtland AFB

White Sands

Buffalo

Fort Drum

Fort Hamilton / Brooklyn

56

41

28

30

35

17

13

6

8

7

27

13

9

12

12

7

4

2

4

3

Griffis AFB / Rome

NIAGARA FALLS IAP

NSU Saratoga Springs

22

28

26

7

6

7

9

9

11

3

3

3

7

3

2

4

28 7 11 3

Stewart ANG / Newburgh

Syracuse

West Point

18

31

6

7

8

12

3

3

Watervliet Arsenal / Albany

23 7 10 3

64

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

State

North Carolina

North Dakota

Base / City

MCAS Cherry Point

Fort Bragg

Jacksonville Region

MCB Camp Lejeune

MCAS New River

Pope AFB

Raleigh

Seymour Johnson AFB

Grand Forks AFB

NRTF La Moure

Minot AFB

S

S

(%g)

16

29

21

29

20

20

5

6

7

S

(%g)

7

10

8

10

8

8

2

2

2

1

10/50 S

(%g)

5

9

6

9

8

7

2

2

S

10/50 S

(%g)

2

4

3

4

4

3

0

1

Ohio

Cleveland

19 5 6 2

Oklahoma

DSC Whitehall / Columbus

Wright-Patterson AFB

Youngstown ARS / Vienna

17

Altus AFB

Fort Sill

McAlester Army

Ammunition Plant

Tinker AFB / Oklahoma

City

20

38

21

32

Tulsa

Vance AFB

15

19

16

23

6

7

5

6

9

7

7

7

6

7

8

6

6

8

7

10

6

7

3

3

2

2

2

2

3

2

2

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Portland

ARS Coraopolis / Pittsburg

Carlisle Barracks

Fort Indiantown Gap /

Annville

Letterkenny /

Chambersburg

93

12

17

21

16

32

5

5

6

5

43

5

7

8

6

17

2

2

2

2

Mechanicsburg

18 5 7 2

28 6 10 3

Philadelphia

New Cumberland /

Defense Depot

Susquehanna

Tobyhanna Army Depot

Willow Grove ARS / NAS

19

22

28

5

6

6

7

9

11

2

3

3

1

65

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2

State

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

Base / City

S

S

(%g)

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

S

(%g)

10/50 S

1

(%g)

NS Newport

21

MCAS Beaufort

Dyess AFB

71

Charleston Region:

Charletion AFB

NWS Charleston

Columbia Region:

McEntire

Fort Jackson

Shaw AFB

MCRD Parris Island

Ellsworth AFB

Arnold AFB

192

219

56

56

67

62

15

30

NSWC LCC / Memphis

141

NSA Mid-South / Millington

150

Nashville

33

NAS JRB, Carswell / Fort

Worth

11

NAS Corpus Christi

Dallas / Irving

8

12

9

Ellington ANG / Houston

Fort Bliss / El Paso

Fort Hood / Killeen

Goodfellow AFB

NS Ingleside

NAS Kingsville

Laughlin AFB

Red River Army Depot /

Texarkana

San Antonio Region

Brooks AFB

Fort Sam Houston

Kelly AFB

Lackland AFB

Randolph AFB

Sheppard AFB

Dugway Proving Ground

Hill AFB

9

31

8

8

12

11

11

11

11

17

35

114

6

19

49

55

16

15

18

17

4

11

38

43

13

5

2

5

4

4

10

4

3

8

19

18

5

12

28

32

12

4

2

4

3

3

14

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

2

6

8

8

6

17

2

2

2

8

2

2

2

6

1

1

1

2

3

3

3

3

3

6

14

48

34

36

22

20

22

5

17

50

8

8

6

6

6

5

2

5

7

7

5

2

1

2

1

1

4

1

1

2

6

17

1

1

1

1

1

66

State

Utah

Virginia

TABLE E-2

Washington

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

Base / City

Salt Lake City

Tooele Army Depot

Dahlgren

Dam Neck / Virginia Beach

Ocean front

Fort A. P. Hill

Fort Belvoir

Fort Eustis

Fort Lee

Fort Monroe

Fort Myer

Fort Story

Henderson Hall / Arlington

Langley AFB / Hampton

NAB Little Creek

Norfolk Region:

Camp Elmore

Craney Island Depot

Norfolk Naval Base

Norfolk Shipyard – Naval

Hospital / Portsmouth

NSA Northwest /

Chesapeake

NAS Oceana / Virginia

Beach

MCB Quantico

Defense Supply Ctr /

Richmond

Radford AAP

Wallops Island

Yorktown Region:

Camp Perry

Cheatham Annex

Yorktown NWS

NS Everett

Fairchild AFB

Fort Lewis / Tacoma

Indian Island SWC

S

S

(%g)

153

73

16

11

18

15

13

19

12

15

11

15

12

11

12

12

12

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

S

(%g)

61

35

6

4

7

6

5

7

5

6

4

6

5

5

5

5

5

10/50 S

1

(%g)

20

12

2

2

2

2

2

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

11

17

22

32

5

5

6

8

4

7

8

2

2

3

10

13

118(a)

39

117

127(a)

67

60

27

5

5

5

5

5

6

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

4

5

42(b)

11

41

46(b)

4

5

62

13

59

63

2

2

20

4

20

21

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE E-2

Seismic Data (Site Class B)

State Base / City

S

S

(%g)

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

S

(%g)

10/50 S

1

(%g)

Washington

NRS Jim Creek

Keyport / Bangor Engin.

Sta Annex

110(a)

129(a)

38(b)

45(b)

59

69

19

22

West Virginia

Wisconsin

McChord AFB

Puget Sound Region:

Bangor NSB

Bremerton NS

Puget Sound NSY

NAS Whidbey Island / Oak

Harbor

Seattle

Allegheny Ballistics Lab

Beckley

Huntington

Sugar Grove NRS

Fort McCoy

General Mitchell AFRC /

Milwaukee

Madison

119

158(a)

150(a)

153(a)

133(a)

151

13

26

19

18

6

11

11

41

56(b)

53(b)

54(b)

47(b)

52

6

8

7

6

3

5

4

61

76

72

73

59

75

10

8

7

2

4

4

20

23

23

23

20

22

4

3

3

1

1

1

Wyoming

Mariana Islands

F. E. Warren AFB

American Samoa

Pago Pago / Tutuila Island

Guam

Saipan / Tinian

Puerto Rico

NRTF Aguada

20

100

150

150

119

5

40

60

60

38

8

50

75

75

2

20

30

30

Fort Buchanan

Ramey AFB

NS Roosevelt Roads

Sebana Seca NRS

89

120

87

90

31

38

28

31

50 20

Notes to TABLE E-2, “EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA – UNITED STATES,

ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS”

(a) – For Navy facilities at identified locations in Washington State use minimum S

150 %g.

(b) – For Navy facilities at identified locations in Washington State use minimum S

50 %g.

S

of

1

of

68

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX F - SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA – OUTSIDE OF THE

UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

F-1 Climatic

Loading Data Table. Site-specific structural climatic loading data for potential DoD locations outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table F-1.

F-2 Earthquake Loading Data Table.

Site-specific earthquake loading data for potential DoD locations outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table F-2.

TABLE F-1 - STRUCTURAL CLIMATIC LOADING DATA – OUTSIDE OF THE

UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Continent

(mph)

Note

(km/h)

Note

/ Region Country Base / City

Africa

Asia

Djibouti

Djibouti

(psf)

0

(a)

90

(inches)

0

(kPa) (a)

0.00 145

(mm)

0

Egypt

Alexandria

0 85 0 0.00 137 0

Morocco

Casablanca

0 90 0 0.00 145 0

Afghanistan

Kabul

78 125

Bahrain

NSA Bahrain

Sasebo

0

India

Bombay

0 91 0 0.00 146 0

Calcutta

Okinawa

(All installations)

Sagamihara

0

0

21

114

180

100

0

0

6

0.00 183 0

Madras

Misawa AFB

0

New Delhi

Iwo Jima

0

Iraq

Japan

Baghdad

Basra

NAF Atsugi

MCAS Iwakuni

21

12

100

120

6

10

1.00 161

0.57 193

152

254

0

91

210

0

0

0.00 146

0.00 338

0

0

58

92

101

0

30

0.00 148

2.78 163

0

762

0.00

1.00

290

161

0

152

12

85

100

0

6

0.00 137

0.57 161

0

152

Tokyo

15 100 6 0.71 161 152

69

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Continent

(mph)

Note

(km/h)

Note

/ Region Country Base / City

Asia

Japan

COMFLTACT

Yokosuka

Yokota AFB,

Honshu

Camp Zama

Kuwait

Oman

Pakistan

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

(psf)

12

21

(a)

100

100

(inches)

6

6

(kPa)

0.57

1.00

(a)

161

161

(mm)

152

161

21 100 6 1.00 161 152

Kuwait City

0 0 0.00 0

Areas south and west of Jabal

Akehadar

- Ibri

0 105 0 0.00 169 0

- Nazwa

Batinah Coast

Kuria Muria

Island

Masirah Island

0

0

120

120

0

0

0.00

0.00

- Ash Shinash

0 105 0 0.00 169 0

- Sib

- Shaww

0

- Suhar

0 105 0 0.00 169 0

Central,

Southern, and

Coastal Areas

Sur to Sarfait

- Barik

- Dawqa

0 115 0 0.00 185 0

0 115 0 0.00 185 0

- Hayma

- Rikshah

0

- Salalah

0 115 0 0.00 185 0

- Shalim

0 115 0 0.00 185 0

High Jabal

Locations

- Miskin

- Sumail

0

0

115

115

0

0

0.00 185

0.00 185

0

0

0

115

115

0

0

0.00 185

0.00 185

0

0

0

105

115

0

0

0.00 169

0.00 185

0

0

193

193

0

0

Mussandam

Island

Peshawar

Doha

0

0

10

0

105

120

88

0

0

6

0

0.00 169

0.00

0.48

0.00

193

142

0

0

152

0

Dhahran

0 87 0 0.00 140 0

70

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Continent

(mph)

Note

(km/h)

Note

/ Region Country Base / City

Asia Saudi Arabia

Hafr al Batin

(psf)

0

(a)

80

(inches)

0

(kPa) (a)

0.00 129

(mm)

0

Khamis

Mushayt

Jeddah

0 80 0 0.00 129 0

Udonthani

0

Jubail

Sattahip

0

Qadimah

0 80 0 0.00 129 0

Riyadh

Chiang Mai

0

South Korea

Camp Casey

20 105 48 0.96 169 1219

Camp Hialeah,

Pusan

Camp

Humphreys /

Pyongtaek

Chinhae

20

20

110

95

24

45

0.96

0.96

177

153

610

1143

Tsoying

20

Kimpo AFB

20 105 48 0.96 169 1219

Kunsan /

Kunsan City

Osan AFB /

Songtan

Pohang

20

20

100

95

30

45

0.96

0.96

161

153

762

1143

Taipei

20

Taegu

20 115 40 0.96 185 1016

Uijongbu

20 105 48 0.96 169 1219

Vietnam

Yongsan

Da Nang

Ho Chi Minh

City

Nha Trang

20

0

0

0

105

120

95

95

45

0

0

0

0.96 169

0.00 193

0.00 153

0.00 153

1143

0

0

0

Taiwan

Seoul

Tainan

20

0

105

120

48

0

0.96 169

0.00 193

1219

0

0

110

130

24

0

0.96 177

0.00 209

610

0

0

105

110

24

0

0.96 169

0.00 177

610

0

Thailand

Tabuk

Bangkok

0

0

80

80

0

0

0.00 129

0.00 129

0

0

0

80

95

0

0

0.00 129

0.00 153

0

0

0

80

85

0

0

0.00 129

0.00 137

0

0

0

80

85

0

0

0.00 129

0.00 137

0

0

Turkey

Ankara

20 99 24 0.96 159 610

71

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Continent

/ Region Country Base / City

Asia Turkey

Incirlik AB /

Adana

(psf)

(mph)

Note

(a) (inches) (kPa)

(km/h)

Note

(a) (mm)

0 70 5 0.00 113 127

Izmir AS

Karamursel

15 95 12 0.72 153 305

Central

America

Canal Zone

Europe Belgium

Bosnia -

Herzegovina

England

0 95 0 0.00 153 0

Brussels

Kester

Kleine Brogel

Shape -

Chievres

Tulza AFB

RAF Alconbury,

Molesworth /

Huntingdon

Birmingham

South Shields

15

RAF Croughton

/ Brackley

RAF Fairford

15 100 15 0.72 161 381

RAF Upwood /

Ramsey

JMF St.

Mawgan /

Cornwall

Sculthorpe AB

RAF

Lakenheath /

Lakeheath

Village

USNA UK /

London

RAF Menwith

Hill / Harrogate

RAF Mildenhall

Plymouth

15

15

15

10

100

95

104

94

15

12

12

12

0.72

0.48

161

0.72 153

0.72 167

151

381

305

305

305

15 99 12 0.72 159 305

Southport

10 104 12 0.48 167 305

15

89

99

12

12

0.72 143

0.72 159

305

305

Spurn Head

15 99 12 0.72 159 305

72

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

(mph)

Note

(km/h)

Note Continent

(psf) (a) (inches) (kPa) (a) / Region Country Base / City

Europe

Germany

Ansbach

Bamberg

Baumholder

Bremen

25 85 30 1.20 137

Buechel Air

Base / Cochem

Darmstadt

Garmisch AST

Geilenkirchen

25 90 0 1.20 145

Grafenwoehr

Hanau

25 55 25 1.20 89

Heidelberg

25

55 30 1.20 89

Hohenfels

Illesheim

Kaiserslautern

Kalkar

Mannheim

Munich

40 98 36 1.92 158

Ramstein AB

NAS Soudi Bay

/ Mouzouras

25 85 30 1.20 137

Rhein-Main Air

Base

Schweinfurt

Larissa

Greece

Spangdahlem

Air Base

Stuttgart

Vilseck

Wiesbaden /

Mainz /

Dexheim

Wuerzburg /

Kitzingen /

Giebelstadt

Athens

25

45

25

55

90

90

30

36

35

1.20 89

2.16 145

CANCELLED

1.20 145

762

914

889

5 92 0 0.24 148 0

762

5 86 0 0.24 138 0

73

914

762

635

0

762

(mm)

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Continent

(mph)

Note

(km/h)

Note

/ Region Country Base / City

Europe

Iceland

Keflavik - NSA

(psf)

30

(a)

115

(inches)

24

(kPa) (a)

1.44 185

(mm)

610

Thorshofn

30 146 36 1.44 235 914

Italy

Aviano AB

35 80 18 1.68 129 457

Brindisi / San

Vito

Camp Darby

Livorno

Gaeta - NSA

5 110 6 0.24 177 152

20 80 0 0.96 129 0

Ghedi

NSA La

Maddalena

NSA Naples

20 80 5 0.96 129 127

20 80 5 0.96 129 127

Niscemi

20 90 5 0.96 145 127

NAS Sigonella

20 90 5 0.96 145 127

Vicenza

35 80 25 1.68 129 635

Netherlands

Volkel Air Base

AF North

Brunssum

Schinnen

Northern

Ireland

133 12 0.72 214 305

Norway

Stavanger

Portugal

Scotland

Azores / Lajes

Field

Southlant /

Oeiras

Aberdeen

Edinburgh

Edzell

0

15

15

15

120

90

99

85

0

12

12

12

0.00

0.72

193

0.72 145

0.72 159

137

0

305

305

305

Londonderry

Glasgow

Prestwick

Stornoway

Thurso

15

15

15

15

15

99

100

120

105

12

12

12

12

0.72

0.72

0.72

0.72

159

161

193

169

305

305

305

305

Spain

Madrid / JHQ

SW

Moron AB

15

10

70

83

20

6

0.72 113

0.48 134

508

152

NS Rota

San Pablo

HRF Valencia

5

5

90

117

5

6

0.24 145

0.24 188

127

152

74

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

Continent

(mph)

Note

(km/h)

Note

/ Region Country Base / City

Europe Spain

North

America

Atlantic

Ocean

Caribbean

Sea

Zaragoza

(psf)

10

(a)

117

(inches)

6

(kPa) (a)

0.48 188

(mm)

152

Canada

Argentia NAS,

Newfoundland

Churchill,

Manitoba

Cold Lake,

Alberta

Edmonton,

Alberta

E. Harmon AFB,

Newfoundland

Fort William,

Ontario

Frobisher, NWT

47

66

41

27

86

73

115 36 2.25

107 permafrost 3.16

81

84

113

81

72

60

60

60

1.96

1.29

4.12

3.50

185 914

172 permafrost

130

135

182

130

1829

1524

1524

1524

50 107 permafrost 2.40 172 permafrost

Goose Airport,

Newfoundland

100 89 60 4.79 143 1524

Ottawa, Ontario

60 90 48 2.87 145 1219

St. John’s,

Newfoundland

Toronto, Ontario

Winnipeg,

Manitoba

Narsarssuak AB

72

40

45

114

90

82

36

36

60

3.45

1.92

2.16

183

145

132

914

914

1524

Greenland

30 139 60 1.44 224 1524

Simiutak AB

25 166 60 1.20 267 1524

Trinidad

Sondrestrom

AB

Thule AB

20 120 permafrost 0.96 193 permafrost

Ascension

Island

The Bahamas

Eleuthera Island

25

0

0

0

135 permafrost 1.20 217 permafrost

67

148

148

0

0

0

0.00 108

0.00 238

0.00 238

0

0

0

Cuba

Grand Bahama

Island

Grand Turk

Island

Great Exuma

Island

NS

Guantanamo

Bay

Port of Spain

0

0

0

161

148

105

0

0

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

259

238

169

0

0

0

Island

0 59 0 0.00 95 0

75

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-1

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

(mph)

Note

(a)

Frost

Penetration

Ground

Snow

Wind

Speed

Frost

Penetration

(inches) (kPa)

(km/h)

Note

(a) (mm)

Continent

/ Region Country Base / City

Indian

Ocean

British Indian

Ocean

NSF Diego

Garcia

Territory

Pacific

Ocean

Australia

H.E. Holt / N.W.

Cape

Woomera

(psf)

0

105

130

0

0

0.00 169

0 209

0 80 0 0 129

Caroline

Islands

Johnston

Atoll

Koror, Paulau

Islands

Ponape

0

0

95

110

0

0

0.00 153

0.00 177

0 95 0 0.00 137

Marcus

Island

0 150 0 0.00 241

Kwajalein

Marshall

Islands

0 105 0 0.00 169

0 110 0 0.00 177

Wake Island

0 95 0 0.00 153

Midway

Island

Philipine Is.

Samoa

Clark AFB

Sangley Point

Subic Bay

Apia / Upolu

0

0

0

90

90

90

0

0

0

0.00 145

0.00 145

0.00 145

0 150 0 0.00 241

Notes to Table F-1, “STRUCTURAL CLIMATIC LOADING DATA – OUTSIDE OF THE

UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

Note (a) – Use a minimum wind speed of 85 mph (137 km/h) for all locations.

CANCELLED

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

76

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-2 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA – OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED

STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

TABLE F-2

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

Region

Africa

Asia

Continent / S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Country (%g) (%g) (%g)

Djibouti

Base / City

Djibouti

82 33 41

Egypt

Alexandria

23 9 11

Morocco

Casablanca

25 10 13

Afghanistan

Kabul

128 51 64

Bahrain

NSA Bahrain

31 12 15

India

Bombay

26 10 13

Calcutta

50 20 25

Madras

14 6 7

New Delhi

71 28 35

Iraq

Baghdad

- Suhar

124 56 62

Basra

98 39 49

Japan

NAF Atsugi

- Ash Shinash

- Sib

187 75

MCAS Iwakuni

94 38 47

Iwo Jima

89 36 45

Misawa AFB

124 56

165 75 83

Okinawa

(All installations)

Sagamihara

187 75

Sasebo

91 36 45

Tokyo

187 75 94

Kuwait

Oman

COMFLTACT

Yokosuka

Yokota AFB, Honshu

Camp Zama

Kuwait City

Areas south and west of Jabal Akehadar

- Ibri

- Nazwa

Batinah Coast

187

200

187

54

91

88

75

80

75

22

36

35

100

27

46

44

40

11

18

18

37

18

38

18

19

166

129

66

52

83

65

33

26

20

29

149 60 75 30

14

3

10

5

6

26

5

5

16

(%g)

77

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-2

Continent /

Region

Asia

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Country

Oman

Base / City

Central, Southern, and Coastal Areas

Sur to Sarfait

- Barik

(%g) (%g) (%g) (%g)

- Dawqa

3 1 2 1

- Hayma

0 0 0 0

- Salalah

8 3 4 2

- Shalim

0 0 0 0

High Jabal Locations

- Miskin

107 43 54 21

- Sumail

- Rikshah

98 39 49 20

- Shaww

99 40 50 20

Kuria Muria Island

Masirah Island

Pohang

19

Mussandam Island

Pakistan

Qatar

Peshawar

Doha

Osan AFB / Songtan

105

6

42

6

53

3

21

3

Saudi Arabia

Dhahran

Kunsan / Kunsan City

10

Hafr al Batin

Khamis Mushayt

Jeddah

6 2 3 1

Kimpo AFB

49

Jubail

7

South Korea

Qadimah

Riyadh

Tabuk

Camp Casey

Camp Hialeah, Pusan

24 10 12 5

6

\2\ /2/

6

2\ /2/

3

2\ /2/

3

2\ /2/

28

15

30

11

6

12

14

7

15

6

3

6

Camp Humphreys /

Pyongtaek

Chinhae

35

19

17

14

7

7

18

9

8

4

3

15

20

6

24

8

10

3

17

4

7

5

8

2

3

19 7 9 4

14

8

6

9

7

4

3

Seoul

17 7 8 3

Taegu

29 11 14 6

78

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Continent /

Region

Asia

TABLE F-2

Central

America

Europe

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Country Base / City

South Korea

Uijongbu

(%g)

17

(%g)

7

(%g)

8

(%g)

3

Yongsan / Seoul

17 7 9 3

Vietnam

Da Nang

18 7 9 4

Ho Chi Minh City

14 6 7 3

Taiwan

Nha Trang

Tainan

13

239

5

96

6

120

3

48

Taipei

325 130 162 65

Tsoying

251 100 125 50

Thailand

Bangkok

28 11 14 6

Chiang Mai

27 11 14 5

Sattahip

21 9 11 4

Udonthani

24 10 12 5

Turkey

Ankara

99 40 49 20

Incirlik AB / Adana

105 42 52 21

Izmir AS

Karamursel

242

139

97

56

121

70

48

28

Canal Zone

93 37 46 19

Belgium

Brussels

32 13 16 6

Kester

36 14 18 7

Kleine Brogel

31 13 16 6

Shape - Chievres

11

Bosnia -

Herzegovina

Tulza AFB

92 37 46 18

England

RAF Alconbury,

Molesworth /

Huntingdon

Birmingham

RAF Croughton /

Brackley

RAF Fairford

18

22

28

16

7

9

11

6

9

11

14

8

4

4

6

3

RAF Lakenheath /

Lakeheath Village

USNA UK / London

54

15

13

22

6

3

27

8

6

3

1

RAF Menwith Hill /

Harrogate

RAF Mildenhall

21

15

9

6

11

8

4

3

Plymouth

20 8 10 4

79

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-2

Continent /

Region

Europe

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Country

England

Base / City

RAF Upwood /

Ramsey

JMF St. Mawgan /

Cornwall

Sculthorpe AB

(%g)

16

20

(%g)

6

4

(%g)

8

10

(%g)

3

2

16 6 8 3

Southport

23 9 12 5

South Shields

11 5 6 2

Spurn Head

Germany

Ansbach

24 10 12 5

Bamberg

Baumholder

21

25

8

10

10

13

4

5

Bremen

10 4 5 2

Buechel Air Base /

Cochem

Darmstadt

33 13 16 7

40 16 20 8

Garmisch AST

46 18 23 9

Geilenkirchen

55 22 27 11

Grafenwoehr

24 10 12 5

Hanau

38 15 19 8

Heidelberg

38 15 19 8

Hohenfels

26 10 13 5

Illesheim

23 9 11 5

Kaiserslautern

25 10 13 5

Kalkar

Schweinfurt

22

Mannheim

Munich

Ramstein AB

Rhein-Main Air Base

40

26

24

39

16

10

10

16

20

13

12

20

8

5

5

8

21

9

8

11

10

4

4

Spangdahlem Air

Base

Stuttgart

24

44

10

18

12

22

5

9

Vilseck

22 9 11 4

Wiesbaden / Mainz /

Dexheim

Wuerzburg /

Kitzingen /

Giebelstadt

38

21

15

9

19

11

8

4

80

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-2

Continent /

Region

Europe

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

Country

Greece

Base / City

Athens

S

S

(%g)

81

S

1

(%g)

32

10/50 S

S

(%g)

40

10/50 S

1

(%g)

16

Larissa

140 26 70 13

Iceland

NAS Soudi Bay /

Mouzouras

Keflavik - NSA

120 34 60 17

100 40 50 20

Thorshofn

49 19 24 10

Italy

Aviano AB

115 46 57 23

Brindisi / San Vito

37 15 18 7

Camp Darby Livorno

62 25 31 12

Gaeta - NSA

50 21 25 11

Ghedi

NSA La Maddalena

71 29 36 14

23 9 12 5

NSA Naples

67 27 34 14

Niscemi

120 31 60 16

NAS Sigonella

120 31 60 16

Vicenza

93 37 46 19

Netherlands

Volkel Air Base

29 12 15 6

AF North Brunssum

Schinnen

55

6

22

6

28

3

11

3

Northern

Ireland

Londonderry

8 3 4 2

Norway

Portugal

Stavanger

Azores / Lajes Field

165 75 83 38

Scotland

Southlant / Oeiras

Aberdeen

Edinburgh

Edzell

Glasgow

61

9

17

11

21

25

4

7

4

9

31

5

8

5

11

12

2

3

2

4

Spain

Prestwick

Stornoway

Thurso

Madrid / JHQ SW

12

10

9

13

5

4

3

5

6

5

4

6

2

2

2

3

Moron AB

61 24 31 12

NS Rota

72 28 36 14

San Pablo

HRF Valencia

66 27 33 13

Zaragoza

15 6 8 3

81

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

TABLE F-2

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

Continent / S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Region Country

North America Canada

Base / City

Argentia NAS,

Newfoundland

Churchill, Manitoba

(%g)

21

(%g)

8

(%g)

10

(%g)

4

1 0 0 0

Cold Lake, Alberta

5 2 3 1

Edmonton, Alberta

8 3 4 2

E. Harmon AFB,

Newfoundland

Fort William, Ontario

16 6 8 3

Frobisher, NWT

Marcus Island

7

Goose Airport,

Newfoundland

Ottawa, Ontario

16 6 8 3

Ponape

91

St. John’s,

Newfoundland

Toronto, Ontario

Winnipeg, Manitoba

19

36

8

15

10

18

4

7

Greenland

Islands

Narsarssuak AB

Simiutak AB

Sondrestrom AB

31

31

31

14

14

14

16

16

16

Caroline

22 9 11 4

Thule AB

37 15 18 7

Atlantic Ocean Ascension

Island

Caribbean Sea The Bahamas

Eleuthera Island

Grand Bahama Island

2 1 1 0

2 1 1 0

Pacific Ocean

Australia

Grand Turk Island

58 23 29 12

Great Exuma Island

19 8 10 4

Cuba

Trinidad

Island

Indian Ocean British Indian

Ocean

Territoty

NS Guantanamo Bay

Port of Spain

NSF Diego Garcia

126

171

70

50

68

28

63

86

35

25

34

14

H.E. Holt / N.W. Cape

47 19 23 9

Woomera

47 19 23 9

Koror, Paulau Islands

70 28 35 14

7

7

7

103

36

41

46

51

18

21

Johnston Atoll

136 54 68 27

95

3

38

3

47

1

19

82

TABLE F-2

Continent /

Region Country

Pacific Ocean Marshall

Islands

Base / City

Kwajalein

Wake Island

Midway Island

Philipine Is.

Clark AFB

Sangley Point

Philipine Is.

Subic Bay

Samoa

Apia / Upolu

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

S

S

(%g)

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

(%g)

S

10/50 S

1

(%g)

119

137

159

195

177

158

48

55

64

78

71

63

60

68

79

97

88

79

24

27

32

39

35

32

CANCELLED

83

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX G - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA AT ADDITIONAL SELECTED

LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND

POSSESSIONS

G-1 Earthquake

Loading Data Table. Earthquake loading data for additional selected cities outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in

Table G-1.

TABLE G-1 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA AT ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS

OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

TABLE G-1

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

Continent /

Region

Africa

Africa

Country Base / City

Algeria

Angola

Benin

Central

Alger

Oran

Luanda

Cotonou

Botswana

Gaborone

Burkino Vaso

Kampala

Burundi

Cameroon

Bujumbura

Douala

Yaounde

Bangui

African

Republic

Chad

Ndjamena

S

S

(%g)

96.1

60.0

5.6

10.9

2.6

44.1

66.1

15.8

26.0

26.0

S

1

(%g)

38.4

24.0

2.2

4.4

1.0

17.7

26.5

6.3

10.4

10.4

10/50 S

(%g)

48.0

30.0

2.8

5.4

1.3

22.1

33.1

7.9

13.0

13.0

S

10/50 S

(%g)

19.2

12.0

1.1

2.2

0.5

8.8

13.2

3.2

5.2

5.2

5.6 2.2 2.8 1.1

Congo

Congo,

Democratic

Brazzaville

Bukavu

Republic of the

Kinshasa

Lubumbashi

Cote d'Ivoire

Abidjan

74.0

37.4

3.7

29.6

14.9

1.5

37.0

18.7

1.8

14.8

7.5

0.7

Egypt

Equatorial

Cairo

Port Said

Malabo

67.2

65.1

26.9

26.1

33.6

32.6

13.4

13.0

Guinea

15.8 6.3 7.9 3.2

Eritrea

Ethiopia

Asmara

Addis Ababa

43.0

55.3

17.2

22.1

21.5

27.6

8.6

11.1

Gabon

Gambia

Ghana

Guinea

Libreville

Banjul

Accra

Conakry

26.0

35.6

36.1

10.4

14.3

14.5

13.0

17.8

18.1

5.2

7.1

7.2

1

84

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

TABLE G-1

Continent /

Region

Africa

Asia

Country Base / City

S

S

(%g)

S

1

(%g)

10/50 S

S

(%g)

10/50 S

1

(%g)

0.9

140.0

70.0

60.0

130.0

30.0

17.0

0.4

70.0

28.0

20.0

32.0

16.0

10.0

0.5

Kenya

Lesotho

Liberia

Libya

Nairobi

Maseru

Monrovia

Tripoli

Madagascar

Tananarive

Malawi

Blantyre

Lilongwe

Zomba

Mali

Mauritania

Morocco

Bamako

Nouakchott

Kenitra

Rabat

Tangier

Mozambique

Maputo

Niger

Nigera

Niamey

Ibadan

Rwanda

Senegal

Kaduna

Lagos

Kigali

Dakar

Sierra Leone

Freetown

Somalia

Mogadishu

South Africa

Cape Town

Durban

Johannesburg

Natal

30.7

6.3

21.4

57.1

18.4

46.3

26.3

48.3

7.7

27.0

25.5

44.3

10.2

0.2

5.6

0.3

27.8

7.7

34.9

26.0

28.7

3.1

12.3

2.5

8.5

22.9

7.3

18.5

10.5

19.3

3.1

10.8

10.2

17.7

4.1

0.1

2.2

0.1

11.1

3.1

14.0

10.4

11.5

1.2

15.3

3.1

10.7

28.6

9.2

23.1

13.2

24.2

3.8

13.5

12.7

22.2

5.1

0.1

2.8

0.1

13.9

3.8

17.4

13.0

14.3

1.5

6.1

1.3

4.3

11.4

3.7

9.3

5.3

9.7

1.5

5.4

5.1

8.9

2.0

0.0

1.1

0.1

5.6

1.5

7.0

5.2

5.7

0.6

6.4 2.6 3.2 1.3

Swaziland

Tanzania

Togo

Tunisia

Pretoria

Dar es Salaam

Mbabane

Zanzibar

Lome

3.1

17.1

17.9

11.5

37.5

1.2

6.8

7.2

4.6

15.0

1.5

8.5

9.0

5.7

18.8

0.6

3.4

3.6

2.3

7.5

Uganda

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Tunis

Ougadougou

Harare

Lusaka

Afghanistan

Bagram

Gardeyz

Herat

Jalalabad

Kandahar

Lashkar Gah

91.0

5.6

21.9

36.4

2.2

8.8

45.5

2.8

11.0

0.2

18.2

1.1

4.4

85

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

TABLE G-1

Continent /

Region

Asia

S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Country

Japan

Base / City

Fukuoka

Itazuke AFB

(%g)

67.4

73.6

(%g)

27.0

29.4

(%g) (%g)

Afghanistan

Mazar-e Sharif

Pol-e Charkhi

Bahrain

Qalat

Manama

Bangladesh

Dhaka

Brunei

Bandar Seri Begawan

Burma

Burma

Mandalay

Rangoon

China

Beijing (Peking)

Chengdu

Chongqing

Guangzhou (Canton)

Harbin

Nanjing

Qingdao (Tsingtao)

Shanghai

Shengyang

Tianjin (Tientsan)

Wuhan

Hong Kong

Hong Kong

Indonesia

Bandung

Jakarta

Medan

Surabaya

Iran

Isfahan

Shiraz

Tabriz

80.0

100.0

60.0

26.9

69.5

37.2

201.0

76.8

55.9

44.2

8.4

13.5

12.4

23.4

31.6

17.3

88.7

72.2

7.3

12.8

164.3

138.1

111.5

96.4

90.8

173.2

30.0

40.0

30.0

10.8

27.8

14.9

80.4

30.7

22.4

17.7

3.4

5.4

4.9

9.4

12.6

6.9

35.5

28.9

2.9

5.1

65.7

55.2

44.6

38.6

36.3

69.3

13.5

34.8

18.6

100.5

38.4

28.0

22.1

4.2

6.8

6.2

11.7

15.8

8.7

44.3

36.1

3.7

6.4

82.1

69.0

55.7

48.2

45.4

86.6

5.4

13.9

7.4

40.2

15.4

11.2

8.8

1.7

2.7

2.5

4.7

6.3

3.5

17.7

14.4

1.5

2.6

32.9

27.6

22.3

19.3

18.2

34.6

181.2 72.5 90.6 36.2

Iraq

Israel

Tehran

Kirkuk

Haifa

Jerusalem

Tel Aviv

205.0

165.0

136.9

106.9

95.2

82.0

75.0

54.7

42.8

38.1

102.5

68.4

53.4

47.6

41.0

27.4

21.4

19.0

33.7

36.8

13.5

14.7

Jordan

Kuwait

Laos

Lebanon

Kobe

Osaka

Sapporo

Yokohama

Amman

Ali Al Salem

Vientiane

Beirut

189.8

178.1

100.4

187

70.2

24.2

53.9

149.7

75.9

71.2

40.2

75

28.1

9.7

21.6

59.9

94.9

89.0

50.2

35.1

12.1

27.0

74.9

38.0

35.6

20.1

14.0

4.8

10.8

29.9

86

Central

America

Europe

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

TABLE G-1

Continent /

Region

Asia

S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Country Base / City

Malaysia

Nepal

Oman

Pakistan

Singapore

Sir Lanka

Kuala Lumpur

Kathmandu

Muscat

Islamabad

Karachi

Lahore

All

Colombo

South Korea

Kimhae

South Korea

Kwangju

Syria

Aleppo

Damascus

Taiwan

Thailand

Turkey

United Arab

Changhua

Kao-hsiung

Songkhla

Udorn

Istanbul

Abu Dhabi

Emirates

Yemen

Belize

Dubai

Aden City

Sanaa

Belmopan

(%g)

55.8

245.5

123.6

128.9

73.3

117.1

37.5

2.6

18.3

12.9

64.3

79.1

274.4

250.6

29.6

24.1

145.8

107.0

168.4

36.6

34.3

(%g)

22.3

98.2

49.5

51.6

29.3

46.8

15.0

1.0

7.3

5.2

25.7

31.6

109.8

100.3

11.8

9.6

58.3

42.8

67.4

14.7

13.7

(%g)

27.9

122.8

61.8

64.5

36.6

58.5

18.8

1.3

9.2

6.5

32.2

39.5

137.2

125.3

14.8

12.0

72.9

53.5

84.2

18.3

17.2

(%g)

11.2

49.1

24.7

25.8

14.7

23.4

7.5

0.5

3.7

2.6

12.9

15.8

54.9

50.1

5.9

4.8

29.2

21.4

33.7

7.3

6.9

53.7 21.5 26.8 10.7

Costa Rica

San Jose

280.4 112.2 140.2 56.1

El Salvador

San Salvador

170.8 68.3 85.4 34.2

Guatemala

Honduras

Albania

Austria

Belgium

Guatemala

Tegucigalpa

Tirana

Salzburg

Vienna

Antwerp

168.3

99.9

111.6

41.5

49.3

19.7

67.3

40.0

44.6

16.6

19.7

7.9

84.2

50.0

55.8

20.7

24.7

9.9

33.7

20.0

22.3

8.3

9.9

3.9

Bulgaria

Cyprus

Czech

Sofia

Nicosia

Prague

116.3

118.0

46.5

47.2

58.1

59.0

23.3

23.6

Republic

12.8 5.1 6.4 2.6

Denmark

England

Finland

France

Copenhagen

Liverpool

Helsinki

Bordeaux

Istres AFB

Lyon

Marseille

11.6

23.0

5.1

16.4

36.2

28.6

44.4

4.7

9.2

2.0

6.6

14.5

11.4

17.8

5.8

11.5

2.6

8.2

18.1

14.3

22.2

2.3

4.6

1.0

3.3

7.2

5.7

8.9

87

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

TABLE G-1

Continent /

Region

Europe

S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Country

Poland

Portugal

Republic of

Base / City

Krakow

Poznan

Waraszawa

Warsow

Lisbon

Oporto

Dublin

(%g)

19.1

5.6

11.7

10.2

67.7

64.5

(%g)

7.6

2.2

4.7

4.1

27.1

25.8

(%g) (%g)

France

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Iceland

Italy

Nice

Strasbourg

Babenhausen

Berlin

Bonn

Dusseldorf

Frankfurt am Main

Giebelstadt

Hamburg

Kitzingen

Landstuhl

Vaihingen an der Enz

Kavalla

Nea Makri

Rhodes

Thessaloniki

Budapest

Taszar AB

Reykjavik

Florence

Genoa

Milan

Palermo

Rome

Siculiana

Trieste

Turin

41.3

42.7

34.2

5.1

42.2

30.6

37.7

21.9

9.2

21.2

23.7

38.7

108.2

86.7

137.0

142.1

46.3

91.8

96.4

66.1

41.3

66.9

89.8

44.8

72.3

16.5

17.1

13.7

2.0

16.9

12.3

15.1

8.8

3.7

8.5

9.5

15.5

43.3

34.7

54.8

56.8

18.5

36.7

38.6

26.4

16.5

26.8

35.9

17.9

28.9

20.7

21.3

17.1

2.6

21.1

15.3

18.8

11.0

4.6

10.6

11.9

19.4

54.1

43.4

68.5

71.0

23.1

45.9

48.2

33.0

20.7

33.5

44.9

22.4

36.2

8.3

8.5

6.8

1.0

8.4

6.1

7.5

4.4

1.8

4.2

4.7

7.7

21.6

17.3

27.4

28.4

9.3

18.4

19.3

13.2

8.3

13.4

18.0

9.0

14.5

53.7 21.5 26.8 10.7

Luxembourg

Luxembourg

Malta

Northern

Ireland

Norway

Valletta

Netherlands

Amsterdam

Belfast

Oslo

21.4

28.6

13.0

8.7

14.8

8.6

11.5

5.2

3.5

5.9

10.7

14.3

6.5

4.3

7.4

4.3

5.7

2.6

1.7

3.0

9.5

2.8

5.9

5.1

33.9

32.2

3.8

1.1

2.3

2.0

13.5

12.9

Ireland

9.4 3.8 4.7 1.9

Romania

Bucharest

104.9 42.0 52.5 21.0

88

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

TABLE G-1

Continent / S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Region

Europe

Country

Russia

Scotland

Base / City

Kiev

Moscow

St. Petersburg

(Leningrad)

Hamilton

Renfrew

(%g)

6.6

6.6

6.6

18.3

(%g)

2.7

2.7

2.7

7.3

(%g)

3.3

3.3

3.3

9.2

(%g)

1.3

1.3

1.3

3.7

21.6 8.6 10.8 4.3

Serbia and

Belgrade

Montenegro

Serbia and

North America Canada

Mexico

Zagrebac

Montenegro

Slovakia

Spain

Bratislava

Barcelona

Bilbao

Sevilleja de la Jara

Sweden

Goteborg

Stockholm

Switzerland

Bern

Geneva

Zurich

Calgary

Halifax

Montreal

Vancouver

Ciudad Juarez

Guadalajara

Hermosillo

Matamoros

Mazatlan

97.2

103.9

56.2

60.0

32.1

12.8

14.4

7.7

44.0

46.3

38.9

19.8

25.0

102.9

90.4

18.2

146.9

46.3

2.0

97.4

38.9

41.6

22.5

24.0

12.9

5.1

5.7

3.1

17.6

18.5

15.6

7.9

10.0

41.2

36.2

7.3

58.8

18.5

0.8

39.0

48.6

52.0

28.1

30.0

16.1

6.4

7.2

3.8

22.0

23.1

19.5

9.9

12.5

51.4

45.2

9.1

73.4

23.1

1.0

48.7

19.4

20.8

11.2

12.0

6.4

2.6

2.9

1.5

8.8

9.3

7.8

4.0

5.0

20.6

18.1

3.6

29.4

9.3

0.4

19.5

Merida

Mexico City

Monterrey

Nuevo Laredo

3.6

56.9

21.5

14.8

1.4

22.8

8.6

5.9

1.8

28.5

10.8

7.4

0.7

11.4

4.3

3.0

South America Argentina

Bolivia

Brazil

Tijuana

Buenos Aires

La Paz

Belem

Belo Horizonte

Brasilia

Manaus

Porto Alegre

Recife

Rio de Janeiro

92.7

6.6

111.0

0.5

0.5

0.5

1.7

0.5

4.1

0.5

37.1

2.7

44.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.7

0.2

1.6

0.2

46.4

3.3

55.5

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.8

0.3

2.0

0.3

18.5

1.3

22.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.8

0.1

89

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

TABLE G-1

Continent / S

S

S

1

10/50 S

S

10/50 S

1

Region Country

South America Brazil

Chile

Colombia

Ecuador

Paraguay

Peru

Peru

Uruguay

Venezuela

Venezuela

Caribbean Sea Bahamas

Barbados

Cuba

Base / City

Salvador

Sao Paulo

Santiago

Valparaiso

Bogata

Guayaquil

Quito

Asuncion

Lima

Piura

Montevideo

Caracas

Maracaibo

Nassau

Bridgetown

Havana

(%g)

0.5

0.5

202.5

289.3

166.4

136.9

204.6

15.3

355.2

188.3

3.6

131.0

104.4

7.1

37.4

25.5

(%g)

0.2

0.2

81.0

115.7

66.6

54.8

81.8

6.1

142.1

75.3

1.4

52.4

41.8

2.9

15.0

10.2

(%g)

0.3

0.3

101.2

144.7

83.2

68.5

102.3

7.7

177.6

94.1

1.8

65.5

52.2

3.6

18.7

12.8

(%g)

0.1

0.1

40.5

57.9

33.3

27.4

40.9

3.1

71.0

37.7

0.7

26.2

20.9

1.4

7.5

5.1

Dominica

Dominican

Roseau

Santo Domingo

Republic

Grenada

Saint Georges

Guadeloupe

Basse-Terre

\1\ Haiti Port au Prince

Cap-Haitain

107.7

173.6

107.3

131.0

157.0

43.1

69.5

42.9

52.4

61.0

53.8

86.8

53.6

65.5

78.5

21.5

34.7

21.5

26.2

30.5

Melbourne

109.2

/1/ Jamaica

Martinique

Kingston

Fort-de-France

Montserrat

Plymouth

Trinidad &

144.9

97.4

162.4

58.0

39.0

65.0

72.4

48.7

81.2

29.0

19.5

32.5

Saint Kitts and

Basseterre

Nevis

Saint Lucia

Castries

Saint Vincent and The

Grenadines

St. Croix

Port Eliazabeth

Frederiksted

149.6

89.8

53.1

80.5

59.8

35.9

21.2

24.2

74.8

44.9

26.5

40.2

29.9

18.0

10.6

12.4

St. John

Bethany

St. Thomas

Charlotte Amalie

108.1

107.5

32.6

32.5

60.1

59.7

17.8

17.8

Scarborough

Tobago

111.8 44.7 55.9 22.4

Trinidad

Vieques

Trinidad NS

Isabel Segunda

0.0

93.1

0.0

28.8

0.0

49.1

0.0

15.4

Pacific Ocean Australia

Brisbane

Canberra

30.6

46.4

12.2

18.6

15.3

23.2

6.1

9.3

46.9

40.1

18.8

54.6

23.4

20.0

9.4

90

TABLE G-1

Continent /

Region Country

Pacific Ocean Australia

Base / City

Perth

Sydney

Islands

Fiji

Marshall

Suva

Majuro

Islands

New Zealand

Auckland

New Zealand

Wellington

Papau New

Guinea

Port Moresby

Philipine Is.

Baguio

Saipan

Tinian

Cebu

Manila

Capitol Hill

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

Seismic Loading (Site Class B)

S

S

(%g)

45.1

43.9

S

1

(%g)

18.0

17.6

10/50 S

S

(%g)

22.5

21.9

10/50 S

1

(%g)

9.0

8.8

78.6

57.1

31.4

22.8

39.3

28.5

15.7

11.4

121.4

83.8

228.2

78.1

164.0

114.0

193.2

99.8

99.4

48.6

33.5

91.3

31.3

65.6

45.6

77.3

39.9

39.8

60.7

41.9

114.1

39.1

82.0

57.0

96.6

49.9

49.7

24.3

16.8

45.6

15.6

32.8

22.8

38.6

20.0

19.9

CANCELLED

91

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

APPENDIX H - SEISMIC SPECTRAL ACCELERATION MAPS AT SELECTED

LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND

POSSESSIONS

FIGURE H-1 - AFGHANISTAN - HORIZONTAL SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION

FOR 1.0 SECOND PERIOD (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING) WITH 2 PERCENT

PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS

CANCELLED

92

UFC 3-301-01

27 January 2010

With Change 2, 31 January 2011

FIGURE H-2 - AFGHANISTAN - HORIZONTAL SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION

FOR 0.2 SECOND PERIOD (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING) WITH 2 PERCENT

PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS

CANCELLED

93

Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertisement