Ordinance amending Chapter VI (Capital Facilities) of the MC Comprehensive Plan

Ordinance amending Chapter VI (Capital Facilities) of the MC Comprehensive Plan

ORDINANCE NUMBER

AMENDMENT To CHAPTER VI (CAPITAL FACILITIES)

OF

THE MASON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

ORDINANCE

amending the Capital Facilities element (Chapter VI) of the Mason

County Comprehensive Plan under the authority of RCW 36.7oA.7o. ·

WHEREAS,

the Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.7oA.J.30) requires each county, including Mason County, to take legislative action to review and revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations to e nsure that the plan and regulations continue to comply with the requirements of the Act; and

WHEREAS,

the on December J.S, 20J.4 the Mason County Planning Advisory

Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed changes to the Capital

Facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan, and passed a motion to recommend approval of said changes.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED,

THE Mason County Board of

Commissioners hereby approves and ADOPTS revisions to Chapter VI (Capital Facilities element) of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan as described by ATTACHMENT A.

DATED this

24 day of March 20J.5

.

Board of Commissioners

Mason County, Washington

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST:

~tV OlM~

·

lerk of the Board

-z~s~

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

~=~

Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

Tim Sheldon, Commissioner

~

\ sioner

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated March 20:15)

ATT MENTA

Capital Facilities

1.

INTRODUCTION

The Capital Facilities Chapter contains the capital facilities element, one of the six elements required for Mason County's Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA)

(36.7oA.o7o RCW). This element provides an inventory of existing conditions and publicly owned facilities by quantifying capital facilities currently provided by Mason County or by other jurisdictions operating in the County.

The chapter also contains goals and policies for the capital facilities operated by Mason County, except for transportation facilities, which are discussed in the Transportation Chapter. The capacity of the County's facilities and the level of service they provide is discussed and compared with the

County's desired levels of service. The "level of service" is an objective measure of how well services are provided to the public. Deficiencies and improvement needs are identified, improvement costs are estimated, projects are scheduled for six and 2o-year planning horizons, and a six-year finance plan and possible financing options are discussed.

Besides the City of Shelton, there are other public organizations and special districts that have capital facilities and taxing authority which exist in the county. These include the school districts, hospital districts, port districts, cemetery district, Public Utility Districts, regional library system, water districts, and fire districts. These districts have their own governing body and capital facilities planning. The County coordinated the comprehensive plan with these bodies, through meetings, correspondence, and by providing draft of the comprehensive plan to these districts for comment.

A list of these districts is provided as follows:

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, l998(updated January 20l5)

Mason County Hospital

District#~

Mason County Hospital District #2

Port of Allyn

Port of Dewatto

Port of Grapeview

Port of Hoodsport

Port of Shelton

Southside School District #42

Grapeview School District #54

Elma School District

#68/~37

Shelton School District #309

Mary M Knight School District #3n

Pioneer School District #402

North Mason School District #403

Hood Canal School District #404

Fire Protection

District#~

Fire Protection District #2

Fire Protection District #3

Fire Protection District #4

Capital Facilities

Fire Protection District #5

Fire Protection District #6

Fire Protection District #8

Fire Protection District #9

Fire Protection District #n

Fire Protection District

#~2

Fire Protection District #~3

Fire Protection District #~6

Fire Protection District

#~7

Fire Protection District

#~8

Cemetery

District#~

Belfair Water

District#~

Public Utility

District#~

Public Utility District #3

Hartstene Pointe Water-Sewer District

Maggie Lake Water District

Tahuya River Valley Water District

Trails End Water District

ORGANIZATION AND CONTENTS

The following section of this chapter includes a list of goals and policies that provides the direction for future capital facility decisions for Mason County. Subsequent sections, 3 through 9

1 profile and analyze seven types of capital facilities in the County, as follows:

• Water and Wastewater Utilities

• Solid Waste Utility

• Parks and Recreation Facilities

• County Administration Buildings e

Police and Criminal Justice Facilities

• Stormwater Management Facilities e

Public Works Facilities

Sections 3 through 9 each include a brief description ofthe existing systems and public entities that provide the facilities. An assessment of future facility needs is also developed for each category of facility. Section

~o discusses financing for county owned and operated facilities for the six-year financial planning period 2m5-2020.

FACILITY NEEDS

A number of methods can be used to determine Mason County's capital facility needs over the next six and 2o-year GMA planning periods. As not all capital facilities require the same level of analysis to determine needed improvements, different analytical techniques can be employed to identify facility needs as long as they accomplish the goal of determining future need for the capital

2

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

2998-

(updated March

2025)

Capital Facilities facilities. While the state Growth Management Act requires that level of service (LOS) standards be established to identify transportation improvements, the need for other capital facilities can be assessed using either LOS or planning level assumptions (WAC 365-1.96-320).

The advantage of using LOS standards is the ability to quantify deficiencies and identify improvement needs. The LOS can also be used as a performance standard for concurrency by comparing the service level being provided by a capital facility against the quantitative LOS standard. The service is considered deficient if it does not meet the service level standard that the

County has determined it wants to deliver to its residents and users. The LOS approach makes the most sense where there are easily quantifiable facilities or where the state has defined the standards, such as for sewer and waterfacilities.

The less rigorous planning assumptions approach also has advantages. The capital facilities planning assumptions are not quantitative measures of facility need. Instead, they identify facility improvements based upon the need to serve growth and development anticipated in the land use element. This approach works best where identification of quantitative measures would be difficult, where there are no statewide standards, or where the necessary information or data to apply quantitative measures would be difficult or too time-consuming to obtain. Facilities such as parks and recreation and stormwaterfacilities might best be handled with this approach.

Fl

Facility needs are identified, and a six-year finance plan is developed, in Section 1.0 for the following

County-owned-and-operated facilities.

" Sewer

.. Water

.. Parks and recreation

• Stormwater

This Section also includes the results of facility planning efforts completed by the County for

County administrative buildings, police and criminal justice facilities, and solid waste facilities.

Financing needs and options are included for these facilities as well. The Section includes by reference the capital facilities plans for Grapeview, Hood Canal, North Mason, Pioneer, and Shelton

School Districts, to facilitate orderly growth and coordination in the provision of future capital facility needs.

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

One of the Growth Management Act goals, referred to as "concurrency," is the provision of infrastructure facilities and services to serve projected growth at the time such growth occurs, or within a reasonable time afterwards. This starts with identifying specific facility needs using the strategies previously discussed. Another important aspect of concurrency is the ability to monitor the development of infrastructure improvements to assess whether they keep pace with approved development.

Concurrency management, as it is called, involves a set of land use and permit approval processes designed to ensure facilities and services keep pace with growth. In some cases, development

3

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998 - (updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities codes could be enacted to require that specific LOS standards be promulgated through the development of identified improvements.

In other cases, restrictions to growth may be imposed until appropriate service standards for capital facilities are achieved. Land use applications for certain development proposals, in areas targeted for future growth, could have their approvals withheld pending concomitant development of appropriate urban service level facilities (e.g., sewer facilities). The municipality would be responsible for managing the concurrent development of these urban services. Requiring individual developers to fund and implement needed improvements is one possible funding method among a variety of other scenarios (e.g., grants, loans, and state, federal, and private sources). Under this arrangement, the final tenant (e.g.

1 home buyer or building purchaser) would ultimately pay for the new facilities through a higher initial purchase price or through a periodic assessment. Mason

County's policies for concurrency management are contained in the following section.

2.

GOALS AND POLICIES

Mason County's Capital Facilities Element is guided by goals and policies for the preferred service philosophy of the County. Goals and policies are required as part of the Capital Facilities Element

(RCW 36.7oA) ofthe overall GMA Comprehensive Plan.

PROCESS

Mason County evaluated its existing facilities, its future needs

1 its costs

1 and the types and levels of services which it should require or provide in the county. The goals and policies listed herein are the result of this process. Policies listed under General Capital Facilities apply to all facilities addressed in the Capital Facilities Chapter. Facility-specific policies apply only to those facilities.

GENERAL CAPITAL FACILITIES POLICIES land Use

Manage land use change and develop County facilities and services in a manner that directs and controls land use patterns and intensities.

CF-:10::1.

CF-:102

CF-:1.03

Establish urban services that shall require concurrency under the GMA.

Ensure that future development bears a fair share of capital improvement costs necessitated by the development. The County shall reserve the right to collect mitigation impact fees from new development in order to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards.

Extend facilities and services in a manner consistent with the following County-wide policies previously adopted in

2005

(see Section ll-3).

County facilities shall be provided at urban or rural levels of service, as defined in the

Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan.

4

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August/ :1998 -(updated March 20:15)

CF-:w6

Capital Facilities

Develop capital facilities within established urban growth areas (UGAs) to conform to urban development standards.

Develop capital facilities within UGAs that is coordinated and phased through interjurisdictional agreements.

Coordinate and support other capital facility plans from special purpose districts, cities and towns, and other non-county facility providers that are consistent with this and other chapters of the Comprehensive Plan.

CF-108 As the capital facilities plan is amended to reflect a changing financial situation or changing priorities, the land use chapter shall be reassessed on at least a biennial basis to assure internal consistency of the land use chapter with the capital facilities chapter

and its six-year financial plan.

Concurrency

Establish standards for levels of service for County public facilities, and ensure that necessary facilities are available at the time new development impacts existing systems.

CF-201 After adoption ofthis Comprehensive Plan and subsequent development regulations, level of service standards for each type of public facility shall apply to development permits issued by Mason County.

CF-202 Adopt level of service standards and concurrency requirements recommended in this plan for wastewater/sanitary systems, water supply systems, transportation facilities, and storm water management facilities.

CF-203

CF-204

CF-205

CF-::w6

Public facilities needed to support development shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development or within a reasonable time thereafter. The County shall establish development regulations that will establish procedures and requirements to assure that the concurrency requirements are met.

New development, which has potential storm water impacts, shall provide evidence of adequate storm water management for the intended use of the site. This policy shall apply in all areas ofthe County.

Building permits for any building necessitating domestic water systems shall provide evidence of an adequate water supply for the intended use of the building. Proposed subdivisions and short plats shall not be approved unless the County makes written findings that adequate provision for potable water are available for each development site. This policy shall apply in all areas of the County.

Building permits for any building necessitating wastewater treatment shall provide evidence of an adequate sanitary sewer system for the intended use of the building.

This policy shall apply in all areas of the County.

5

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015) Capital Facilities

Develop a six-year finance plan for capital facilities that meets the recommendations of the comprehensive plan, achieves the County's levels of service, and is financially attainable.

Adopt a six-year capital improvement program that identifies projects, outlines a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all County capital facility projects.

For all capital facility projects, evaluate alternatives to programs, purpose, and service as a method to reduce capital facilities and associated operating costs.

Develop a public process that informs, notifies, and allows participation on all capital facility proposals.

Essential Public Facilities

Facilitate the siting of essential public facilities

1 sponsored by public or private entities within unincorporated areas when appropriate.

Identify and allow for the siting of essential public facilities according to procedures established in this plan. Essential public facilities shall include group homes, state and local correctional facilities, substance abuse facilities, and mental health facilities.

Work cooperatively with the City of Shelton and neighboring counties in the siting of public facilities of regional importance. Work cooperatively with state agencies to ensure that the essential public facilities meet existing state laws and regulations that have specific siting and permitting requirements.

Review proposed development regulations to ensure they allow for the siting of essential public facilities consistent with the goals, policies and procedures established in this plan.

FACILITY-SPECIFIC POLICIES

Wastewater/Sanitary Sewer

Assure that wastewater facilities necessary to carry out comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance these facilities in an economic, efficient, and equitable manner.

CF-501

Maintain a safe, efficient and cost-effective sewage collection and treatment system.

CF-502 All new development within designated urban growth areas and rural activity centers shall connect to existing or planned sewer systems. In developing areas where a

Department of Ecology Facility Plan has been approved the use of on-site sewage disposal should be discouraged until the public sewer system is available. Public sewer systems include those owned and operated by any legally recognized municipal organization as a public utility.

:1

RCW 36.70A.2oo(:L) The comprehensive plan of each county and city that is planning under RCW 36.7oA.o4o shall include a process for identifying and siting essential public facilities. Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, [marinas, railroad systems], state education facilities and state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.o6.:L40, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 7:L.09.020.

6

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998-

(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

Allow existing single-family homes and businesses in the Urban Growth Areas with septic systems to continue using septic systems until such time as public sewers are available. Replace deficient septic systems in a timely fashion and require conversion when public sewers are available.

Provide a septic system management and education program to protect groundwater quality and promote the proper care and use of septic systems.

Eliminate any unlicensed point or non-point pollution sources associated with sewage transport and disposal.

CF-so6 Monitor infiltration and inflow (1&1) in major public systems through routine inspection.

Conduct improvements to limit and reduce current 1&1.

Encourage innovative approaches to manage wastewater treatment.

Water

Supply

Assure that water facilities necessary to carry out the comprehensive plan are available when needed, and finance those facilities in an economic, efficient and equitable manner.

CF-60:1 Ensure that the supply and distribution of water in public systems is consistent with the

Mason County Comprehensive Plan.

CF-602

Ensure that future water system expansions and service extensions are provided in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Where possible

1 those uses designated by the Land Use Element to require fire flow should be serviced by a Class A water system.

CF-603 Plan for and create ways to use Class A reclaimed water for beneficial use to replace withdrawals from the community's aquifers.

Parks and Recreation

Achieve level of service targets for park land and facilities that support County objectives and priorities.

CF-70:1

Identify and preserve significant geographic

1 historic and environmental features and other characteristics that reflect Mason County's natural and cultural heritage.

CF-702 Increase park development within urban areas and develop a comprehensive system of multi-purpose trails throughout the County

Develop and adopt a realistic long-range schedule for park management/ maintenance, and operation. Adopt a workable County capital improvement program (CIP) every six years, to be amended as needed.

7

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities

Update current

2006

Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan in

20n to project future demands and needs; define acquisition, leases, and development opportunities; draft financial implementation programs; and be eligible for state and federal grants.

Administrative Services

Develop and implement a long-range program of expansion and improvement to accommodate the County's projected administrative staffing requirements.

CF-8o:t

Annually review the long-range facilities plan for buildings and space improvements to efficiently provide work space for projected staffing levels.

Police and Criminal Justice

Develop and implement a coordinated facility program among the departments and agencies that

provide the County's police and criminal justice services.

CF-902

Complete a strategic long-range plan for the effective and coordinated operation and management of all County police and criminal justice functions, including a full analysis of ail space and facility needs required to support the plan.

Explore alternative funding sources for law and justice facilities and operations, including contracts for service with other agencies and joint use of facilities.

Stormwater Management

Create a facilities strategy that preserves and supplements necessary natural drainage processes and other natural systems to minimize runoff impacts from development.

CF-1.oo:1.. Investigate needs and means for implementing and maintaining a safe and costeffective storm and stormwater collection system in identified problem areas.

CF-:1..002

Protect surface and ground water quality through state and local controls and public education on water quality issues.

CF-:1..003 Design stormwater systems to meet the approval standards prescribed in the Mason

County Stormwater Management Ordinance.

CF-:1..004 Protect physical and biological integrity of wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat, and other identified critical areas.

CF-::wos Maintain water quality within all Shoreline Management Act waterfront areas through careful design, operation, construction, and placement of public facilities.

CF-:1..oo6 Carefully control development in areas with steep slopes where surface water runoff can create unstable conditions. Maintain natural vegetation for slope stabilization.

Public facility development shall minimize impacts to shorelines, preserving the natural stream environments where possible.

8

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998

-(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

CF-1.oo8 Comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and state regulations.

Under no circumstances should hazardous waste be allowed to contaminate the groundwater, surface water, or sewer systems of Mason County. Dispose of hazardous wastes only in locations designated for that purpose.

Solid Waste

Ensure that garbage collection and recycling needs of the County are met in an efficient and costeffective manner.

CF-1.1.0:1 Manage a cost-effective and responsive solid waste collection system.

CF-no2 Manage solid waste collection methods to minimize litter, neighborhood disruption, and degradation ofthe environment.

Promote the recycling of solid waste materials through waste reduction and source separation. Develop educational materials on recycling and other waste reduction methods.

WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES

INTRODUCTION

The County owns and operates two public water systems, Rustlewood and the Beards Cove system.

These systems serve an average of

750 residential connections. The County also owns and operates three sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities, North Bay /Case Inlet Water Reclamation

Facility, Rustlewood and the Belfair Water Reclamation Facility. North Bay/ Case inlet Water

Reclamation Facility provides wastewater treatment to protect Case Inlet from sewage contamination. The Rustlewood facility protects the water of Pickering Passage and the Belfair

Water Reclamation Facility protects the water quality in Hood Canal. The three systems are designed to provide service to approximately 3,ooo total customers. The Belfair and Case Inlet

Facilities serve the present and future populations in both urban growth areas. Both the Belfair

Water Reclamation project and the Case/Inlet use advanced water treatment science to produce

Class A reclaimed water Future sewer extensions for the Belfair area will occur in phases. Belfair

Build out is predicted by

2025.

The following "Water" and "Wastewater" sections provide project-level detail on the planned improvements necessary to meet state regulatory guidelines in the provision of water and wastewater services for these systems. Each project in each section is accompanied by a separate project sheet, which provides a description, and justification, along with a table depicting the estimated costs and funding sources for planning period

201.5 though

2020.

A summary table that provides overall costs and funding sources for each water and sewer system follows each section.

Financing the planned utility improvements requires the use of grants, loans, utility fees, system development charges, developer contributions, and capital reserves. The specific combination of

9

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998

-(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities funds, and the availability of grants and loans, will affect user rates for each system as well as the timing on projects. The ability to initiate specific projects will be assessed annually based on the urgency of need, reserve funds available, and commitments from funding agencies to provide grants and/or loans. The decision about whether or not to proceed with any planned project is the decision of the Mason County Board of Commissioners for consideration in the annual budgeting and rate-setting process. To the extent possible, projects will be funded through:

~

~

~

~

~

Rate revenues (capital reserves)

Grants

Low interest loans developer contributions

County issued revenue bonds

Project costs shovvn in each section range in accuracy from+

or~ 40~'6

to+ lS%.

Each project

cost sheet identifies the accuracy ofthe estimated costs shown, based on the following scale:

• "Planning Level"- The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of+ or40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a ievei of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program overtime.

~

"Design Report"- Moderate accuracy, in the range of+ or30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs.

• "Engineer's Estimate"- Most accurate estimate, in the range of+ or -15%. These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of design work.

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August

1

~998

-(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

Name:

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

403-

North

Minor

Sewer System and System Improvements Program

Estimates: Planning Level

Description: Annual improvements program for system facilities, buildings, and grounds.

Projects may include small piping improvements, pump stations, lighting, exterior painting, and other general improvements.

Justification: The treatment plant and system construction provided basic functionality, however the facilities and system need improvements from time to time to correct deficiencies and improve operational capabilities. Plant operations and system maintenance staff are not equipped to address these types of improvements in addition to the plant operations. It is also anticipated that some of this work can be completed professionally and more expediently through contracts with specialty firms and contractors.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2.01.S

2.01.6

201.]

201.8

201.9

2.02.0

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants so so so so so so so

Total so

300

so

so

so

so

300

Loans

Rates

TOTAl FUNDING: so so so so so so so so so so so

300 so

300

~~

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998

- (updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & VV ASTE MANAGEMENT

Fund: Sewer

Installation of Permit Required Monitoring Wells Name:

Estimates:

Planning

Description: This project will install4 small bore monitoring wells to allow groundwater depth measurement and water sampling. The sites required by Department of Ecology have been identified as well as the required depths.

Justification: Required by the Department of Ecology's Operating Permit.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Prelim Engineering

1.0

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

20 so

8o

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

So

8o

TOTAL

8o

8o

1.0

20 so

8o

1.2

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & VV ASTE MANAGEMENT

Fund:

Name:

Sewer

Treatment Plant Upgrades

Estimates: Planning

Description: Analyze the options for providing additional treatment plant capacity and provide engineering to design the improvements for construction in subsequent years.

Justification: The existing plant may be reaching design capacity for treatment in

20::18.

This will require Mason County to revisit the original sewer facility plan and address how we will maintain sufficient capacity for the twenty-year period beyond

20l8.

This project outlines the need for funding to conduct the analysis and design the next increment of capacity for the plant. For planning purposes it is assumed that as the treatment plant reaches its twenty year life cycle improvements not only to capacity will be needed but capital replacement will need funding as well. In the event development escalates beyond the current rate this project may need to be advanced.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Prelim Engineering so

Design Engineering

Construction lSO

TOTAL COST:

:::LSOO so

150

1500

Funding Sources:

Grants

75

7SO

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

7S

750 so so

150 1500

TOTAL so l50

2SOO

1]00

825

825 so

1]00

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998 -(updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

Inlet Sewer

Name: Basin Analysis and Developer Review Services

Engineers Estimate

Description: Engineering services to assist staff in planning for future development and developer review.

Justification: The Allyn UGA will develop and grow. Currently there are many large lots that will be divided and platted. There are also many small lots that will be combined and developed. In addition many of the rights of way and easements have been vacated and are now private property. This ongoing analysis will assist county staff with the identification of sewer system expansion needs at the treatment plant, within the UGA, and with review of developer submittals as this growth occurs.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015

2016

20:q

2018

2019

2020

TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants

(.09

funds)

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

20

20

20

20

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

95

95

95

95

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August

1

~998-

(updated March

20~5) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

Beards Cove Water

Beards Cove Distribution

Planning

Improvements

Estimates:

Description: Installation of a booster pump to improve water pressure to residences near the water storage tank and provide additional fire flow to the entire community and install service meters.

Justification: Currently only the top 16.7 feet or 12o,ooo gallons of the

6o{

40o,ooo gallon

Storage tank can be considered for usable storage. The total requirement forth is system identified in the 2002 water system plan is 250,050 gallons. Technically the system is 15o,ooo gallons deficient on usable storage. in addition approximately

$500

1

000

is needed to complete a service meter installation by 2017. The system has been preparing for this for some time. As a result a significant number of meter sets have been installed however state law requires that any funding application for a water system project that does not have service meters must include service meters as part of said project. Therefore Mason County is required to include service meters and the two projects have been combined as a result.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands}

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction so

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

6so so

Gso

Grants

Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING: lSO

32S so l75 so

Gso

TOTAL so

Gso

700 l50

325

225

700

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015) Capital Facilities

2015~2020

CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

Project Name:

411-

Water

Rustlewood Water System Improvements and Meter Installations

Estimates:

Description: Installation of Water Service meters on all new and existing water service connections

Justification: The Water Use Efficiency Rule requires all water systems install service meters by January

2017.

The community will benefit from meters by providing leakage data and allow billing based on usage. The system improvements are needed to replace aging equipment in the well house and upgrade the control system that is well beyond the expected life cycle. This is a financially challenged community that needs grant assistance to complete this project while keeping rates affordable. To qualify for funding the Rustlewood Water System will need to complete a Small Water System Plan in

2015.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

20::1.5 20::1.6 20::1.7 20::1.8 20::1.9 2020

TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

5

50

5

so

Construction

300

300

TOTAL COSTS:

5

350

355

Funding Sources:

Grants

225

125

225

l25

Loans

Rates

TOTAL

FUNDING:

5

5

350

5

355

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March

2025)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & Vv ASTE MANAGEMENT

Project Name:

Rustlewood Sewer System Infiltration

Estimates: Planning

Description: Infiltration and Inflow (1&1) Reduction

Inflow Reduction

Justification: The Wastewater Collection System continues to show the effects of its age by allowing ground water to leak into the system causing high flows into the treatment plant during period of groundwater saturation. This project is designed to reduce those flows to manageable levels. The activities could include the repair and replacement of side sewer, manhole and pipeline grouting, and installation of pipe linings. Mason County needs to continue to monitor and repair observed leakage into the system and correct identified inflow conditions as they arise.

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COSTS:

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

20::1..5

20::1..6

20::1..7

20::1..8

20::1..9

2020 TOTAL

25

11.0

::1..35

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

25

1-30

::1..55

Funding Sources:

Grants

~00 ~00

20 20 Loans

Rates

TOTAL FUNDING:

1.5

::1..35

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

35

::1..55

J-7

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August

1

:1998 -(updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES

&

WASTE MANAGEMENT

Name:

Estimates:

405 -

Capital Development

Belfair Sewer Development

Engineering

Description: Design and Develop documents required for constructing the Belfair Sewer

Collection and Reclamation Facilities and provide construction Management Services.

Justification: In 2on the county completed the first phase of the Belfair sewer system. The next phase of the system must be completed by

20~7 in accordance with a Growth

Management Hearings Board ruling. However, given the past "Great

Recession~~ it should be argued that the development of the next phase ofthe collection system should be delayed.

Meanwhile, the Belfair Sewer Advisory Committee is preparing recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction soo

3000 4500

500

3000 4500

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants loans

Rates

450

2]00

~350 so 300 3150

TOTAL FUNDING: soo

3000

4500

TOTAL soo

7500

8ooo

4500

3500

8ooo

:18

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

Name:

405 Capital

Hoodsport Sewer Design

Planning

Description: Design the Hoodsport Sewer System

Justification: This project may not be required. It is anticipated that the project and need may be eliminated. However, until Public Works has direction from the Mason County Board of

County Commissioners, the project will remain in the Capital Facility Plan Documentation.

Originally, this project was developed to address the low oxygen levels in Hood Canal which are partly attributed to the inability of on site septic systems to reduce nitrogen. By conveying wastewater to a technologically advanced sewage treatment facility that can significantly reduce nitrogen, and apply the effluent upland, this project will reduce the human contribution of nutrients to the waters of Hood Canal.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

201.5 201.6 201.7 201.8 i.o1.9 2020

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

Total Costs

Funding Sources

Grants

Loans

Rates

Total Funding

990 51.0

7500

990 8010

990 801.0

990 8010

Total

1.500

7500

9000

9000

9000

19

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998-

(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & Vv ASTE MANAGEMENT

Project Name:

Estimates:

Biosolids thickening facility

Engineers Estimate

Description: The purchase and installation of thickening equipment required to achieve a

20% solids concentration

Justification: The current method of hauling and disposing of liquid biosolids with concentrations of about

2% is not cost effective. In addition it is not suitable for com posting without significant de-watering. With the increasing generation of this material at the treatment plant alternatives to the current process need to be implemented.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

20::1..5

20::1..6

20::1..7

20::1..8

20::1..9

2020

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering 6o

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

550

TOTAL

6o

550

6::1..0

Loans

Rates

TOTAL

FUNDING

6o

6o

550

550

610

6::1..0

20

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

:1998-

(updated March

20:15)

4. SOLID WASTE UTILITY

Capital Facilities

Mason County's solid waste utility provides transfer and disposal operations for solid waste at four transfer station locations, including household recyclable materials. The largest transfer facility is located outside Shelton on Eels Hill Road. Materials collected from the other smaller stations at

Hoodsport, Union, and Belfair, are transported to the Shelton facility, where garbage is processed into containers that are trucked to Centralia, W A. From there, the material is long-hauled via railroad to Roosevelt Landfill in Klickitat County, located in Eastern Washington.

Household hazardous wastes (HHW) are collected and disposed of by Mason County staff at the

Shelton transfer facility. Residents in North Mason County can take their HHW to the Kitsap

County transfer station. This arrangement is established through interlocal agreement and Mason

County pays approximately $6o per customer for collection and disposal of materials from residents who take their materials to the Kitsap County facility.

The Shelton transfer facility is located at the former Mason County Landfill. The current utility provides post-closure monitoring and capital construction in support ofthe closed landfill. The

Shelton facility receives wastes collected by private and municipal haulers operating inside Mason

County.

The Belfair and Shelton transfer facilities have capacity due to the "Great Recession" of 2oo8-2oog, which reduced the annual collected tonnage at the facilities. Growth in the Belfair area and elsewhere in the County will continue to impact operations at these facilities and capacity improvements may need to be addressed in the future.

The County will continue to review the feasibility of "privatization "of the solid waste operations the

County manages. The following pages provide details on specific projects proposed for the current capital facilities planning period. Project estimates range in accuracy from+ or40% to+ or -15%.

Each project cost sheet identifies the accuracy ofthe estimated costs shown based on the following scale:

1111

• "Planning Level"- The least accurate of costs estimates, in the range of+ or40%. Cost estimates at this level are usually based on a project concept and some assessment of relative scale, or annual program amounts commensurate with a level of activity sufficient to accomplish the intent of the program over time.

*

"Design Report"- Moderate accuracy, in the range of+ or-

30%. Based on design report evaluation of options and an assessment of project elements and associated costs.

"Engineer's Estimate"- Most accurate estimate, in the range of+ or -15%. These estimates are based on a project design or significant completion of the design work.

2:1

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998

-(updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

Project Name:

Waste

Facility Improvements Belfair

Planning Level

Description: This facility serves the north end of the County by providing residential drop off of garbage and recyclables five days a week. Growth in this part of the county had been significant prior to

2008.

The system currently has capacity due to the reduction in construction as a result of the American "Great Recession" of

2008 and

2009.

Improvements to the site will be required to meet the handling demands and ensure safety over the next few years. These could include road work, expansion of tipping areas and recycling and household hazardous waste collection facilities as well as tollhouse improvements. A wholly new facility, with scale and compaction equipment to service commercia! vehicles may be necessary by the end of this planning period.

Justification: If flow control should be necessary, then waste collected by the commercial hauler would need to be directed to the Belfair site. In addition, a security issue exists at the site with continued trespassing/vandalism of the property in order to gain access to scrap metals stored on the site. Improvements are needed to assure adequate handling capacity and safety ofthe users and employees.

Prelim Engineering

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

5

Design Engineering

25

20

TOTAL

5

25

Capital equipment

Construction

TOTAL COST:

200

225

200

95

20

310

220

225

295 sso

Funding Sources:

Rates (tipping fees)

Other: timber

20 so 220

200

290

200

Other: post closure reserve

Total Funding

260

20

320

220

160

550

22

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated March 2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

Waste

Shelton Transfer Station Project Name: Improvements

Estimates:

Level

Description: This facility is the central hub for all waste collected from other satellite transfer stations, and the City and Mason County Garbage before being exported for disposal. It is sized properly for current demand on the system at the adjusted, post 2009 level. A new site plan needs to be developed and constructed that will likely include moving the tollhouse and scales, adding additional lanes for traffic and truck turning and storage areas, new or modified tipping building(s) and developing a more efficient area for diversion of recyclable materials as well as installation of scale software, lights and reader systems.

Justification: Safety at this facility as well as efficient handling of waste streams is a concern.

It is significantly undersized for the volume of users. Equipment and tipping areas are a safety hazard and ingress and egress is extremely inefficient. Modern waste handling procedures that ultimately allow more cost efficient operations are needed. The County is ending a 2o-year landfill post-closure period and financial assurances set aside in reserve for any post-closure activities may come available to help defer the costs of the project. Operational changes can also be optimized to reduce the overall cost impact.

Estimated Project Costs

(in

thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

TOTAL

Site Plan development/ Environ. Review

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Capital Equipment

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants (.og funds)

Loans

Rates (tipping fees)

Other: post closure reserve funds

FUNDING: so

1:1

6:!.

3

3

5

50

6:!.

20

150

200

370

100

240

30

370

3

3

25

:150

250

431 lOO

23

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998-

(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & WASTE MANAGEMENT

Waste

Shelton Transfer Station Scale System Project Name:

Estimates: Design Report

Description: This facility is the central hub for all refuse and recycling collection and transfer services. An enginee(s design review identified the que line (wait time) as the largest problem in facility efficiency. Scale software technology exists that would allow for a more efficient and accurate weighing/charging procedure at the tollhouse. A scale/software system will be installed that will provide computerized scale transactions. This includes hardware and software for automating customer transactions. Also, an automated system for commercial solid waste vehicles will allow "attendant-free transactions" greatly improving efficiency, accuracy and reducing wait times for self-haul customers. Safety will also improve as commercial garbage trucks can be processed separately from smaller vehicles.

Justification: This facility serves County self-haul residents, businesses and commercial customers and safety on site as well as efficient handling of customer scale transactions is needed. Technology to automate and more accurately process transactions at tollhouse weigh stations has existed for over 15 years. Moving to a software-based system will also allow for accepting debit and/or credit cards at the Shelton facility. Reducing the queue line wait was the number one recommendation in an engineering site plan review document prepared several years ago. The use of the facility has greatly increased and wait times can be upward of 45 minutes during busy times.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Capital Equipment

Construction

~s

10

TOTAL COST:

25

Funding Sources:

Grants (.og funds)

Loans

Rates(tipping fees)

TOTAL FUNDING:

25

25

TOTAL

~s

10

25

25

25

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998-

(updated March

20~5) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES

&

Vv ASTE MANAGEMENT

402-Solid Waste

Shelton Household Hazardous Waste Improvements

Estimates: Design Report

Description: This facility serves Mason County residents by providing free drop-off opportunity of household generated hazardous wastes. It has outgrown its original design capacity and no longer meets certain handling regulations. The facility needs improved spi!! prevention safeguards including an impervious surface for the unloading area. Lighting and ventilation needs to be upgraded for current handling requirements. Some additional changes to storage facilities and emergency containment/decontamination are also needed.

Justification: Due to National and State regulation changes

1 the facility no longer meets all requirements for safe handling of household generated hazardous wastes and needs some retrofits to come into full compliance with regulation mandates. Because these changes are

Federal and State mandated

1 grant funding may become available.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

20l.5 20l.6 20l.7 20l.8 20l.9 2020 TOTAL

Prelim Engineering

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

Funding Sources:

Grants (.og funds)

Loans

Rates (tipping fees)

TOTAL

FUNDING

3

20 so

73

23 so

73

40

40

40

40

3

20 go l.l.3

23 go l.l.3

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March 2025) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

UTILITIES & Vv ASTE MANAGEMENT

Name:

Waste

Facility Improvements Shelton, Hoodsport, Union and Belfair.

Estimates: Planning

Description: An annual program to ensure continued operational effectiveness and increase safe public use of Mason Countts 4 transfer station facilities, preserving life expectancy of existing assets and providing for safety of county workers. Improvements will include road grading, resurfacing and paving, building repairs and modifications such as roofing, tip floor and walls, safety bollards, signs, chains, curbing, fencing, paint and tollhouse upgrades. Other improvements will include modifications to storage and handling facilities such as grading for additional tipping areas and expanded area for source-separated recycling collection to meet the demands of the facility use.

Justification: Ongoing operation of the transfer stations requires an ongoing maintenance, repair and improvement plan for existing fixed assets. This allows the County to meet facility use demands, stay current with regulations, and provide for customer and employee safety.

Minor improvements are needed routinely because of the high wear and tear on these types of facilities. In addition, changes in handling practices for improved safety and service may require minor improvements to facilities and sites. Providing an ongoing annual maintenance and improvement program is prudent as it can prolong and ensure maximum longevity of existing assets.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

TOTAL

Prelim Engineering {Hoodsport & Union) 6 6

Design Engineering

Construction

TOTAL COST:

5

so

5

so

5

so

8

5

so so

5

so

55 55 55

64

55 55

33

300

339

Funding Sources:

Grants (.og funds)

Rates (Post Closure account)

Rates (tipping fees)

FUNDING:

19

36

55 55

64

55 55

55 55 55

64

55 55

19

320

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998

- (updated March

20~5)

PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES

Capital Facilities

Recreational opportunities in Mason County include parks for day-use activities and overnight camping; fresh and salt water areas for boating and other water sports; facilities and equipment for sports and play activities; and wilderness areas and other open spaces for hiking, hunting, ORV use, and horseback riding.

Existing parks and recreation facilities in Mason County are available through a variety of public and private entities. Federal and state facilities include camping, boating, and day-use parks. The

County-owned park system includes day-use and water access facilities, sports fields, and related recreational areas. Other agencies providing park and recreational resources include municipalities, port districts, and public schools. Some private recreational facilities are open to the public as well.

Mason County has adopted a Parks and Recreation Plan in November of 2006, which was updated and adopted again in 2on, and a Mason County Regional Trails Plan in March of 2008. Both of these plans are incorporated herein by reference.

COUNTY LITIES

The County currently manages 22 park properties in Mason County two of which are undeveloped, and four others have large portions that are also undeveloped. Of the developed parks, two are large baseball/softball complexes, six provide saltwater access parks, three are located on freshwater lakes, and three provide upland day use and recreation facilities (see

FIGURE

5-2). In addition to the day use facilities, the County also owns and maintains one above-ground skate park.

The conditions ofthese facilities vary by location; however, significant investment in facilities has been made in the last six years from Real Estate Excise Tax proceeds (REET 2) and grant proceeds from the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). Future investments made from the REET 2 fund will be dependent on actual tax proceeds and additional project funding (i.e. grants). The capital plan for the next six years continues this trend of investment in park development and facility upgrades. The heavy use and demand from both county and non-County residents are particularly high during the spring, summer and fall.

Park visitation continues to either remain static or increase, depending on the park location. Mason

County does not charge a use fee (except at sports facilities) and this has led to the increase in park use. MCRA Park is the highest used park with an average of about 24o,ooo visits per year and

Sandhill Park also receives significant attendance with about go,ooo visits per year. The boat launches at Mason Lake and Latimers Landing are very popular with the boating public and are highly used. Both Boat launches have had extensive renovation work over the past 6 years. The remaining two boat launches at Union and Shorecrest are unimproved, but are still used by the public extensively. Mason County also has a nice inventory of community parks with play equipment, picnic facilities and other amenities, examples include Walker Park, Truman Glick Park,

Union Park, Menards Landing, and Rendsland Park. Mason County Recreation Area, the largest baseball/softball complex has grown in use the last several years and is now recognized regionally as a preferred site for major tournaments. In 2on, two new synthetic turf infields opened and this has increased the interest in using the park for tournaments. The spike in fuel prices in 2008 and

27

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August

1

:1998- (updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities the global recession has also led to increased park use as people are staying closer to home to recreate. Oakland Bay Historic Park and Sunset Bluff View Park were opened

20~3.

Both provide passive recreation, trails, water access and other amenities.

There are no facilities for overnight camping throughout the Mason County Parks system. The last county-wide park plan was developed in

~99~ and subsequently updated in

20~2.

Camping options will be examined in the long-term development plan being crafted for these and other park properties with large portions of undeveloped land. Mason County developed a new county-wide parks plan in

2022, which includes analysis and recommendations to address recreation needs within the county. Camping by special use permit has been approved for Truman Glick Park and

Foothills Park and Walker Park. As mentioned earlier the county parks plan was updated in

2022 and approved by the Board of County Commissioners.

Residents and non-residents have consistently rated trails and vvater access as the highest priorities

in public outreach that has been done by the County. The survey work in

20~2 again revealed the publics two highest priorities are access to water and trails.

An inventory of all Mason County parks including federal, state, private, and County-owned parks is listed in

TABLEs-~.

Also included are the number of acres and amenities available at each park location.

TABLE

5-:1.. INVENTORY OF PARKS

Name of Facility Acres

Belfair State Park

Harstine Island State

Park

Hoodsport Trails

Hope Island

Jarrells Cove

Lake Isabella

62.77

320

So

206

42.6

193·75

Amenities Available

Washington State Parks

Camping: 234 tent sites, 47 utility sites, primitive sites, wheelchair accessible trails, trailer dump facility.

Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: day use area; walking/hiking trails; so campsites.

Natural area with trails.

Undeveloped. Future development plans include: trails; picnic tables; rest rooms; 6 to 8 campsites; group camping for 150 people.

Washington Water Trails site.

Camping: 20 tent sites; group site for max. 64 people, 2 picnic shelters, facilities for handicapped, wheelchair accessible trails, marine pump out station, 2 docks providing soo ft of moorage, 14 mooring buoys.

Fee required.

Currently undeveloped. Future development plans include: full-service park, camping/ picnic area, lakefront beach, and restrooms. Plans will be completed in the next 10 to 20 years.

Lilliwaup Tide Land

1.79

Tidelands for public use. No facilities. Small shoulder area for parking.

McMicken Island

Potlatch State Park

Schafer State Park

:11.45 s6.95

:119

Currently undeveloped. Boater destination; clamming. Plans to develop include: 5 to 8 camping sites

1 com posting toilet.

Camping: 27 tent sites; 28 utility sites; primitive sites. Underwater park

1 trailer dump facilities.

Camping: 47 tent sites, 6 utility sites, primitive sites

1 day use group

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

2998

-(updated March

2025)

Capital Facilities

Squaxin Island

Stretch Point

Twanoh State Park

32·4

4·2

182 area, trailer dump facilities

Closed indefinitely.

Natural area. Day use onlyi s mooring buoys. No plans for future development.

Camping: 30 tent sites, 9 utility sites, primitive sites, handicapped facilities/ and wheelchair accessible trails.

Total

1.20:1..91.

Aldrich Lake

Benson Lake

Cady Lake

Clara Lake

Devereaux Lake

Haven Lake

Island Lake access

Isabella Lake

Lake Kokanee

Lake Limerick

Lost Lake

Lake Nahwatzel

Maggie Lake

Mason Lake

Panhandle Lake

Panther Lake

Phillips Lake

Pricket Lake

Skokomish River

Spencer Lake

Tahuya River

Tee Lake

Twin Lake

Union River

Victor accessto North

Bay

Wildberry Lake

Wooten Lake

Total

Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife

o.s

78.8

1.6

9

1.3

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 1S vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 100 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 10 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 40 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for so vehicles.

4·:1.

1

1.6

Freshwater boat launch, toilets.

Boat launch, parking for 20 vehicles.

Boat Launch, parking for 100 vehicles.

44 o.s

1.3

2.0

0.4

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 30 vehicles.

Boat launch, parking for 40 vehicles.

Boat launch, parking for 10 vehicles, toilets

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 1S vehicles.

20

Boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

Undeveloped.

3·8

1 o.s

64

2

2.9

3·6

3·6

61.8

·S

10

1

320.8

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for 40 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 30 vehicles.

30.6 feet of riverfront, shore access, parking for 20 vehicles.

Boat launch, beach access, parking for so vehicles.

4,400 feet of riverfront, parking for 10 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 20 vehicles.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 1S vehicles.

8,098 feet of riverfront, parking for 10 vehicles.

Boat launch, pit toilets

Undeveloped.

Unpaved boat launch, parking for 6o vehicles.

Aldrich Lake Camp

Camp Pond

Camp Spillman

Elfendahl Pass

Staging Area

Howell Lake

Washington State Department of Natural Resources

"'24

1JOO ft waterfront, hand boat launch, 4 picnic tables, 4 campsites, toilets, drinking water, lake stocked with trout, parking for 16 vehicles.

=10 s

Day use only

Boo ft waterfront, 6 campsites, 4 group sites, toilets, drinking water. n picnic sites, self-contained RVs okay, toilets, drinking water

Kammenga Canyon sian Creek 1

3 group sites, 10 campsites, hand boat launch, toilets, drinking water

1 parking for 20 vehicles.

2 campsites, toilets

Parking for trail access

29

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998 -

(updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

Trailhead

Robbins Lake

Tahuya River Horse

Camp

Toonerville

Twin Lakes

Melbourne

Lilliwaup

Public Tidelands #24

Public Tidelands #33

Public Tidelands #34

Public Tidelands #43

Public Tidelands #44 a,b

Public Tidelands #46

Public Tidelands #47

Public Tidelands #48

Eagle Creek

Recreational

Tidelands

Rendsland Creek

Tidelands

Total

1.1

"12

5·7

7

175ft waterfront, hand boat launch, 3 picnic tables, toilets. Day use only.

1,6oo ft waterfront, 9 campsites, 2 group sites, toilets, drinking water,

20 horse corrals.

570ft waterfront, 4 campsites, 2 picnic sites, toilets.

6 camp sites, 3 picnic sites, toilets, hand boat launch. Lake is stocked with trout.

Lake setting, 1,ooo feet waterfront, 5 campsites, toilets.

Stream setting, 500 feet waterfront, 13 campsites, toilets, drinking water.

Water access only.

Water access only.

'vVater access only.

Road access, clamming.

Road access

1 clamming, crab pot fishing.

Water access only

1 clamming, oysters, shrimp pot fishing.

Water access only, clamming, oysters.

Water access only, clamming, oysters

Road access, clamming, crabbing.

Road access, clamming.

"65.8

United States Forest Service

Big Creek

Campground

Brown Creek

Campground

Hamma Hamma

Campground

Lena Creek

Campground

Lower Lena Lake

Campground

Upper Lena Lake

Campground

Total

Brewer Park

Callanan Park

City Park

Eleventh Street Site

Huff and Puff Trail

6

5

6

7

78 camp sites, toilets.

Picnic area, 12 campsites.

Hike-in only, 40 camp sites, pit toilets ..

Hike-in only, 14 camp sites, pit toilets.

24

City of Shelton Parks and Recreation Department

0.3

6.g

1.75

0.92

So

3 picnic tables, curbside parking only.

Lighted softball field with spectator stands, 7 picnic tables, 2 swings, 1 slide, rest room, foot trails across 40-foot natural depression, parking space for 30 vehicles plus additional parking along street.

Currently undeveloped.

Deep well location with the potential to be developed into a city park.

2 miles of jogging trail and 20 incorporated exercise stations, drinking

30

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998 -

(updated March

2015)

Kneeland Park

Johnson Park

Loop Field

Oakland Bay

Overlook

Pine Street Boat

Launch

Total

Port of Dewatto

Campground

Sanderson Field

Oakland Bay Marina

Total

Waterfront Park in

Allyn

Kayak Park

North Shore Ramp

Belfair/North Shore lngvald Gronvold

Waterfront Park

Fair Harbor Marina

Latimer's Landing overflow parking area

Foothills Park

Capital Facilities

3·9

0.5

4

:1..03

6o feet fountain and parking for

20 vehicles at trailhead.

2 slides, swings,

:1. merry-go-round, horizontal bars,

:1. dome climber,

:1. large sand box,

:1. small log playhouse, a few rocking saddle mates, horseshoe pit, aging rest room and picnic shelter, deteriorated clubhouse,

:1.0 picnic tables,

2 tennis courts in need of resurfacing, street parking for approximately

25 vehicles.

1 merry-go-round,

:1. swing, single basketball backboard and substandard concrete court, street parking for approximately

:1.0 vehicles.

2 tennis courts, softball field, soccer field, jogging trail along the perimeter,

:1. picnic shelter,

5 picnic tables, rest room, parking for

100 vehicles.

Views of downtown Shelton, industrial waterfront, Oakland Bay, and the Olympic Mountains, historic band saw display with large log

section and interpretive information/ paved parking for 5 vehicles.

Development plans for the next

2 years include: picnic area

1 rest rooms, kiosk, small shelter, additional parking.

Crude gravel boat launch and a deteriorating wooden boat repair grid.

99·3

:L

:L/:1.70

Port of Dewatto

Camping: n with hook-ups

1

:1.9 tent sites;

2 rest rooms; nature/hiking trails;

23 picnic tables; two picnic shelters;,

:1. kitchen; fishing. Future plans to add more stoves and picnic tables

1 and to place gravel around kitchen. Fee required.

Port of Shelton

Flying:

5

1

000

feet of runway

1 tie downs

1 skydiving; rifle club; model aircraft society. Future plans to provide increased hangar availability.

Boat moorage.

1170

2

·3

:1..2

2

Port of Allyn

400 feet waterfront

1 moorage

1 dock (for up to

:1.5 boats)

1 picnic

1 gazebo

1 parking for

20 vehicles. Office building planned.

:1.50 feet waterfront

1 small parking lot

1 picnic tables

1 portable toilet facilities.

:1.50 feet waterfront

1 boat launch with floating dock

1 beach access

1 parking for

20 vehicles with trailers.

Port of Hoodsport

Dock

1 saltwater beach access

1 tidelands

1

2 portable rest rooms.

5

2.5

So

Port of Grapeview

Boat launch and parking area

Mason County

Primary use is to provide parking for neighboring Latimer's Landing, parking for

20 vehicles.

:1. field which serves as a multiuse field; basketball court; rest rooms; children's play area; picnic tables; parking for so vehicles.

3/27/2015

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015)

Harvey Rendsland

Jiggs Lake

Latimer's Landing

(Water)

8

3-00

Mason County

Recreation Area

(MCRA Sport)

Mason Lake Park

(Water)

Phillips Lake County

Park (Picnic)

Sandhill Park (Sport)

40

17-36

0.4

30

Capital Facilities

Currently undeveloped; 1

1

905 feet waterfront. To include parking area for five vehicles, picnic area and vault toilet.

Saltwater access boat launch for vessels no longer than

20 feet, parking for 35 vehicles, portable toilet, boat dock; additional parking available at neighboring Latimer's Landing overflow parking area.

Renovated in 2008.

7 baseball/softball fields which also serve as soccer and football fields; children's play area, bleachers/ maintenance shop, user's storage facility, seasonal concession stand, 4 batting cage; parking for 100 vehicles. This facility serves as the headquarters for the Mason County

Parks Department. Fee required for scheduled field use.

Renovated in 2011. 1.36 acres currently in use; freshwater access/boat launch for small watercraft/ dock, play area/ rest rooms/ 4 picnic table; parking for maximum of so vehicles. The County owns 12 unused acres that can be used for expansion of the park (possible trails, picnic area

1 and remote camping area).

Passive day use area

1 picnic area

1 located next to State of Washington

Boat Launch with vault type toilets.

7 baseball/softball fields, one multiuse field, bleachers; parking is available for 100+ vehicles; concession-restroom building; 4 fields and parking renovated in 2006; walking path around park.

Jacoby Park (Water)

Truman Glick

Memorial Park

(Picnic)

Union Community

Park (Picnic)

Union Boat Ramp

(Water)

Hunter Park

Skate Park

Walker Park (Water)

Oakland Bay County

Park

Sunset Bluff Park

Watson Wildwood

View

Menards Landing

Park

Harstine Island

2.8

35·46

1.92

0.16

·5

.6

5-04

So

36

36

8

6.9

320 feet waterfront

1 boat launch for vessels no longer than

16

feet

1

saltwater beach access

1

3 picnic tables.

Natural setting

1 creek/ trails

1 picnic tables

1 covered group shelter

1 barbecue pit

1 vault toilets/ RV area

1 and children's play area. Future improvements include: possible construction of group camping area and interpretive signage along trails.

Picnic shelter

1 children's play area; small baseball diamond

1 basketball court; rest rooms.

Boat ramp for access to Hood Canal

1 portable toilets

1 limited parking.

2 picnic tables

1 bus shelter

11 above ground ramps in Shelton

Saltwater access to Hammersley lnlet

1 gravel beach

1 picnic tables

1 barbecues/ rest rooms

1 shelter

1 children's play area

1 interpretive center providing marine information; parking for 15 vehicles.

Habitat preservation area and education center Opened in 2012

1 includes interpretation areas

1 trails

1 picnic opportunities/ parking

1 two vault toilets and improved access road.

36 acres of undeveloped property with 1500 feet of waterfront on

Oakland Bay. Plans include beach access

1 trails

1 picnic area

1 water access

1 small parking area and vault toilet.

Undeveloped

Recently transferred from the Port of Tahuya to County. Parks provides beach access

1 picnic areas, gazebo, portable toilet, access to

DNR tidelands

1 small boat launch for kayaks and canoes; 7 acres undeveloped

Undeveloped

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

2998-

(updated March

2025)

Capital Facilities

Decker Creek

Preserve

Coulter Creek Natural

Area

Total

Belfair Elementary

Sandhill Elementary

Hood Canal

Elementary/Junior

High School

Oakland Bay Middle

School

Olympic Middle

School

Hawkins Middle

School

Pioneer Elementary

Grapeview

Elementary

Southside Elementary

Bordeaux

Evergreen

Elementary

Mountain View

Elementary

Shelton High School

Mary M. Knight

District

North Mason High

School

Theler Center

Shelton/South Mason

Soccer Park

Glen Ayr Canal Resort

Lake Nahwatzel

Resort

Little Spencer RV

Park

500

Open Space/Natural area

55

Tidelands, natural area, passive recreation. Opened in

2.012 and includes parking for 6 vehicles, vault toilet, wildlife viewing, water access improved entry path.

949·64

Mason County Public Schools

Playground.

Playground.

2 baseball backstops,

1 football field, bleachers, playground, track, parking for

30 vehicles.

X

X

2 baseball backstops, covered play area, playground.

Playground

1 baseball backstop.

Football field, soccer field, playground, track.

Playground.

5 baseball backstops, football field, soccer field, playground.

6 tennis courts,

2 baseball backstops, football field, soccer field, bleachers,

2 swimming pools, track, rest rooms.

2 baseball backstops,

1 football field, bleachers, playground.

135

14

2 baseball backstops,

2 tennis courts, football field, soccer field, bleachers, playground, track.

Private Facilities Open to the Public

Wetlands interpretive trails

6 soccer fields,

1 under development

10

2

Adult-only RV park with hookups; no tent camping, motel,

2 rest rooms,

2 showers, laundry facility, saltwater boat launch, beach access, tidelands, spa, fishing, clamming, oysters, dock.

Camping:

12 utility sites,

5 sites without hookups;

2 rest rooms,

2. showers, boat launch, freshwater beach access, nature/hiking trails, 8 picnic tables, restaurant, fishing, swimming, cabins.

33

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15)

Minerva Beach RV

Resort and Mobile

Village

Rest-A-While RV Park and Marina

20

J.S

Capital Facilities

Camping:

23 sites without hookups, so sites with hookups; s rest rooms, 6 showers, laundry facilities, boat launch, saltwater beach access, 6o picnic tables, driving range, scuba dive center.

Saltwater boat launch, moorage, dock,

70-80 camp sites with hookups

(may be used for RVs or tents), 4 rest rooms, 4 showers, laundry facilities, beach access, clamming, oysters, fishing, boat rentals, nature trail, 6o picnic tables,

2 covered picnic areas with kitchen, concession stand. Future improvements include easier access to marina, and boat fuel.

Total 196

Other

Picnic area, so campsites, parking for 6o vehicles. Olympic National

Park- Staircase

Campground

Tacoma City Light

Saltwater Park

Mike's Beach Resort

Robin Hood Village

COUNTY TOTAL

4038·95

6 picnic tables, rest rooms, saltwater boat launch, saltwater beach access.

Boat launch, SCUBA diving, cabins, camping, beach access for guests

16 RV sites, cabins, camping, beach access for guests

PROJECTS

The following pages provide details on specific Park projects proposed for the current capital facilities planning period.

34

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name:

REET2 Program

Name:

Sunset

Park and

Construction Level

Description: Develop 35 acre park along Oakland Bay with beach access, trail development and other passive recreation opportunities. Main improvements to include improved entry road, formal parking, beach access, and picnic facilities.

Justifications:

2012 park plan placed high priority on water/beach access and trail development.

Estimated Project Costs {in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Planning and Design

Acquisition

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total

Costs:

Funding Source

750

750

750

750

InHouse

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

375

375

750

375

375

750

35

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Vv'ORKSHEET

PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Fund Name:

REET2

Name:

Watson

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services. Phase one is a master plan for the Park. Phase

2 would include development of a parking area

1 restroom

1 trails

1 and passive recreation. Park is 35 acres and was donated to the County.

Development would provide infrastructure for public access

Justifications: There is no current master plan of record for this park site and it is the only

County Park between Allyn and the Pierce County border. Site also has potential as a trailhead for a Regional Trail in the area.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 201.7 2018 2019 2020 Total

Planning, Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

40

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

40 40

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 -(updated March 2015) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET2 Program

Name:

Estimates:

Boat Ramp

Construction

Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development to renovate the existing County Boat Ramp in Union on Hood Canal.

Justifications: Project listed as a high priority in the

2012

County Parks P!an. Project wou!d enhance water access and boating.

Estimated Project Costs thousands)

2025 2026 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Planning

1

Design

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

400

400

:1.00

300

400

400

:1.00

300

400 400

8oo

8oo

200

6oo

8oo

37

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015~2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN \iVORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Project Name:

Estimates:

Sandhill

Construction Level

Description: Scope of this project includes planning/design and development services to complete the renovation of Sandhill Park. Main work would include the renovation of fields #1 and #2. New backstops, ADA access, irrigation, and complete field renovation would be included.

Justifications: This project is listed as a high priority in the 2012 Park Plan. Plan recommended improving existing facilities before developing new facilities. Addition of new equipment to existing facility.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Planning

1

Design

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

350

350

175

175

350

350

350

175

175

350

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Park Planning

Construction Level

Description: Would involve completing a park plan to facilitate public access to the park and then the development of a parking area, picnic facility, and passive recreation and support facilities.

Justifications: This Park was donated to Mason County in

2007

by Washington State Parks. It provides water access to Jiggs Lake. Water access is the top priority in the

20l2

County Parks

Plan. Additional developed park space is needed on the Tahuya Peninsula.

Estimated Costs (in thousands)

20l.5

20l.6

20l.]

20l.8

20l.9 2020

Total

Planning and Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

234

234

U7 ll7

234

234

234

1l7 ll7

234

39

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 -(updated March 2015) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN VVORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name:

REET2

Project Name:

Estimates:

Park

Construction Level

Description: Scope ofthis project includes basic park improvements, including park amenities such as tree removal, picnic tables, park benches, trash containers, and signage.

Justifications: This sma!! park has had very !itt!e in the

way

of improvements and is needed.

Planning, Design

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs (in

20::1.5

20::!.6 20::1.] 20:::1.8

20::1.9

2020

10

10

:10

:::1.0

:10

10

:10

::1.0

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Park

Construction Level

Description: The Oakland Bay property was purchased jointly by the County and the Capitol

Land Trust. Project scope would involve a two-phase development program for the park. The first phase would concentrate on public access facilities, the entry road

1 parking area, restrooms, and signage. The second phase would concentrate on trail development, environmental education facilities, and interpretative displays. This project is for planning and improvements to the historic home.

Project listed in the

20l2

County Parks Plan as a high priority for implementation.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Planning and Design

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March 2.025)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN \iVORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Landing

Construction Level

Description: This park was transferred from the Port of Tahuya to Mason County in 2oo6.

Project scope includes improvements that would incorporate ADA access improvements, new picnic facilities, non-motorized watercraft improvements to the present launch site, and new park amenities such as park benches and garbage cans.

Justifications: Project listed in the 2ou County Parks Plan as a priority for implementation.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Total

Planning and Design

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

InHouse

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

~00

100

~00

100

~00

100

~00

100

42

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998(updated March 2025)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET

2

Capital Improvement Program

Name:

Estimates:

Mason

Construction Level

Area Improvements

Description: Project scope would involve needed renovations and improvements to MCRA

Park. The improvements include: new field lights

1 restroom renovation, irrigation improvements

1 drainage upgrades

1 new office

1 new bleachers

1 play equipment surfacing! asphalt, scoreboards

1 and concession building. Projects include outfield irrigation

1 restroomconcession building, lights on fields

2 and

3

1

parking and master planning.

Project listed in the

20:12

County Parks Plan for implementation.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Total

Planning and Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

500 soo

250

250 soo

500

500

250

250 soo

1.000 l.OOO

1.000

1.000

1000

43

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998 -

(updated March

2015)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Mason Boat Launch

Construction

Description: Renovation of restroom facility

1 play equipment

1 picnic shelter

Justifications: Original building from 2970's needs ADA upgrades.

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs

20::1..5 201.6 201.7 201.8 2019 2020 Total

258

258

258

258

258

258

258

258

44

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS D EP AR TMENT

Name: REET2 Program

Project Name:

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: Project scope would involve implementation of Park Improvement Plan based on

Park Site Plan developed in 2008. Improvements would provide more amenities at the park than what currently exist, including a boat launch, dock and pier.

Justifications: Project listed in the 201.2 County Parks Plan for implementation.

Planning and Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs (in thousands)

201.5 201.6 201.7 20::1.8 20:19 2020 Totai

45

45

15

30

45

85o

85o

110

740

85o

200

200

200

200

1095

:1095

325

770

::1.095

45

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 - (updated March 2025)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Foothills

Construction

Park

Description: This park serves the Hoodsport area as the primary Community Park and has a play area

1 basketball court

1 restroom building and open field area. Improvements would involve addition of amenities to improve the user experience; this would include picnic facilities

1

ADA improvements; signage

1 and renovation of the existing turf. There has been suggestions to locate an off leash dog park at this site, but so far no formal action has been undertaken to accomplish that.

Justifications: Project listed in the

20J.2

County Parks Plan.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Planning and Design

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

30

30 30

30

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 -(updated March 2025)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Project Name:

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: Acquired additional water front property to develop trail network and boardwalk.

Justifications: Waterfront park land and trails were rated highest priority in the

2008 work plan.

Acquisition

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: ·

Costs (in thousands)

20:15

20:16

20:17

20:18

20:19

2020

:1000

260

1260

230

2230

:1.260

J.OOO

260

:1260

130

2230

:1.260

47

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March 2025) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name:

Name:

REET2

Estimates: Construction

Description: Restroom renovation, ADA upgrades.

Justifications:

Picnic shelter and other improvements

Estimated Project (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

2020

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998-

(updated March

20~5) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Construction Level

Description: Pathway connecting Port of Allyn with Coulter Creek Park. A concept plan has been completed investigating how a non-motorized pathway could be built along the County

Road Right of Way to connect the Port of Allyn Park with Coulter Creek Park to the tip of Case

!n!et. The first phase would be just over two miles long. This trail could also be the beginning of a larger trail network connecting Allyn with Belfair. The County Trails Fund

1 administered by

Public Works could be one of the primary funding sources for this project. State grant funding is another possibility. The addition oftrails and water access were high priorities in the recent parks plan and this project would provide both a trail and access to water.

Justifications: High priority project from both the 2006 Park Plan and 2008 County Regional

Trails Plan.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

County Trails Fund

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

75

725 1.75

8oo

400

400

Boo

20

:1.95

:1.95

195

95 goo

995

400

:1.95

400

995

49

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS D EP AR TMENT

Name:

1

Name:

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: Trail development program for Mason County.

Justifications: Begin Implementation of a trail development program as per the County

Regional Trails Plan.

2015

201.6

2017

201.8

2019

2020

Total

Planning and Design

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so

300

300

300

300 so

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name:

Project Name:

Estimates:

Park

Construction Level

Description: Improve road end next to Lenard K's restaurant for use as a park and picnic area.

Justifications: Citizen request from

2012 parks plan for waterfront access and improvements

Acquisition

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs (in

20:1S 20:16 20:17

201.8

201.9

2020

Total so so so so so so so so

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March 2025)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Expansion

Construction Level

Description: Extend and improve pathways within Kennedy Creek Park.

Justifications: Pathways listed as a high priority in the

2006

Park Plan and

2008

County Trails

Plan.

Acquisition

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

20:1.5

20:1.6

2017 201.8

201.9

2020

6oo

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Goo

6oo

Goo

70

70

70

70

6oo

70

G70

6oo

70

G70

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Fund Name: REET2

Project Improvements

Construction Level

Description: Renovate restroom, ADA upgrades

Justifications: New or renovated restroom

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source ln.House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total

Funding:

368

368

368

368

368

368

368

368

53

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 (updated March 2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET2

Name:

Estimates:

Mason School District

Construction Level

Description: Partner with NM Mason School District to renovate one football soccer field.

Most likely the main stadium field. Community use would be allowed when school district is not using the facility.

Justifications: Need for soccer- football field in North Mason County

Estimated

Costs thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: lOOO lOOO soo soo

1000

Total lOOO

1000 soo soo

:1.000

54

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS D EP AR TMENT

Name:

2

Name:

Estimates:

Water

Construction

Description: Develop a water spray park in Shelton Area of Mason County and in Belfair Area of Mason County

Justifications: current unmet need

Estimated Costs

2015 2016

2017

2018

20:19

2020

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

500

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

500

250

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

250 soo

Total soo soo

250

250 soo

55

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name:

REET2

Project Name:

Estimates:

Construction

Description: Skate Park for Mason County

Justifications: 2on Park Plan Recommendation

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

300

300

300

300

1.50

300

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name:

REET

1

Name:

Estimates:

Oakland

Acquisition

Property

Acquire

27 acres owned by Ron Gold next to Oakland Bay Park

Justifications:

2012

Park Plan Recommendation

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Acquisition

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2o2o Total

425

57

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998- (updated March 2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET

1.

Project Name:

Estimates:

Planning Construction Level

Description: Rail with Trail from Shelton to Belfair

Justifications: 2008 Trail Plan and 2on Park Plan. HIGH PRIORITY- but have not been able to achieve cooperation from U.S. Navy. At this time the project would be on a "hold" or

"deferred" status. Project could commence with land use agreements and funding. An estimated cost is about $5,ooo,ooo.oo.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Total ss

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name:

Name:

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: There are four street ends in the Union area that citizens are interested in converting to small water access pocket parks. These sites can also facilitate access from water to land was well for kayakers and canoes. These sites could enhance the Cascadia Marine Trail.

The p!an is to begin working on the Orre Nobles site.

2on park plan placed high priority on water/beach access and trail development. Union Improvement Club supports this project as well.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

20:15 20:16 20:17 20:1.8 20:1.9 2020

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Acquisition

Total

Costs:

Funding Source

4

4

4

4

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

4

4

4

4

Total

8

8

8

8

59

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015)

6.

COUNTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS

Capital Facilities

Mason County owns several buildings, most of which are located in the City of Shelton, the county seat. These buildings are used to support general County functions such as internal management, health, public service, and general administration. Other buildings owned by the County include

Memorial Hall, the two buildings on Pine Street that house the Mason County Sheriff, the Public

Works Campus and the Belfair Public Works Shop. Table

Vl.6-~ describes these sites.

Memorial Hall and the two buildings on Pine Street are located in Shelton, a few blocks from the main campus area. The Public Works campus is located about 4 miles north of Shelton, on the northwest side of Highway

~m.

The Belfair Public Works Shop is situated on the north shore of

Hood Canal about 3 miles from Belfair.

Mason County's administrative offices and departments housed in the buildings are listed in TABLE

Vl.6-2. Also provided is a summary of current office area allocations for the County departments and departmental functions.

Most ofthe County's administrative offices are located in the Shelton Campus, a four-square block section of the downtown area. At this location, the County operates from 23 publicly owned buildings. These include the Courthouse, Jail, Juvenile Detention Facility, Building I, Building II,

Building Ill, Building IV, Building V, Building VI, Building VII, Building VIII, and Building IX. Other county administrative offices are, the 3rd & Pine building (the Sheriff Office), and Public Works campus.

FACILITY NEEDS

Mason County has conducted an assessment of the condition of all county owned buildings and facilities. This document, entitled "Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment", July 2012, is on file with the Mason County Department of Facilities and Grounds. The facilities assessment completed in 2012 only looked at existing County Buildings and recommended improvements. The assessment is more of a maintenance plan or maintenance assessment rather than a County Facilities and

Building Master Plan that looks forward 6 to

12 years attempting to gauge future building needs and expansion needs.

Additionally, Mason County completed a Special Needs Assessment and Campus Master Plan. This work was completed in 2008 prior to the great recession and prior to Mason County implementing large lay off's of staff. Prior to the onset of the recession, Mason County did have a deficit in space for employees. But with layoffs implemented from 2008 to the present, the County overall does not have near the deficits that were present and forecasted prior to the recession. Some facilities are in need of additional space, such as the courthouse and the jail, but overall the need is not as great as it was in

2008.

The jail is receiving additional space with the DSU remodel that will be completed in early 2015. There is an immediate need for additional courtroom space. Mason County does need a comprehensive review of current facilities and a forecast of what additional space will be needed in the future, especially for the jail, juvenile detention, and court space.

6o

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 -(updated March 2015) Capital Facilities

The Facilities Assessment completed in 2012 is the first known attempt to establish a true buildings and facilities capital improvement program. Many ofthe buildings and facilities are more than 30 years of age or older and there is plenty of deferred maintenance. If an active program is not implemented soon, in the future Mason County could expect to experience multiple building failings at or about the same time, causing great financial hardship to the County. The assessment looks at roofs, mechanical systems, electrical systems, windows, and other components of each building, and will establish a program for building improvements in the future.

At present, staff is actually attempting to consolidate as many employees and services into various buildings to try and more efficiently use the space we have. Buildings that have extra space or are vacant can be leased or possibly put up for surplus. Based on the "Space Standards Manual// published by the State of Washington Department of General Administration, 251 square feet are needed per employee. In addition, certain governmental functions have special requirements for

facilities.

TABLE 6-1. Summary of Administration Sites

Site Square Feet Acres

Shelton Campus 169,200 3.88

Memorial Hail 12,000

0.275

Belfair Public Works Campus Approx. 61,ooo

1.4

Public Works Campus

3rd & Pine Property

57,979

19,000

40

1.16

TABLE

6-2. Buildings and Space Allocations for Administrative Offices

Assessor

Auditor

Department or Office

Central Operations

Ft 2 Building

2,525

Building I

3,228 Buildings I, XI, Courthouse

99

Building I, VII

1430

Courthouse

2,121 Building Ill

Clerk

Community Development

Cooperative Extension Office

Coroner

County Commission

District Court

Equipment, Rental & Revolving Fund (ER&R)

Facilities & Grounds

Health Services

Permit Assistance Center

Probation Services

Prosecutor

Public Works- Maintenance

Sheriff

Superior Court

Treasurer

2,377

99

2,322

Building IV

Building Ill

1,508

Building I

Courthouse, Building VIII

374

Buildings I, IX, Ill, Public Works

757

Building IX, Courthouse, 3rd & Pine

3,299 Buildings II, Ill,, VIII

1,726

Building Ill

1,383

Building VIII

3,535

Building VII

3,500

Belfair Shop

13,000 3rd & Pine, Belfair Sub-Station

4,371

Courthouse, Building VI

2,157

Building I, Courthouse

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1.998- (updated March 201.5) Capital Facilities

The following information was derived from the Space Needs Assessment and Campus Master Plan completed in November of 2008. As was mentioned earlier in this section, the November 2008 space needs analysis was completed prior to the onset of the great recession and prior to large layoffs implemented by Mason County. The information should be revisited and revised if needed to meet current conditions.

Mason County Space Needs Update -Area Projections for primary space needs

Department

Assessor

Auditor

Treasurer

Budget and Finance

I

Risk Management

Human Resources

Facilities and Grounds

ER&R Services

County Commissioners

Central Operations

Clerk

District Court

Superior Court

Probation Services

Juvenile Detention

I

Alternatives to Detention

Sheriff

Adult Detention

I

Alternatives to Detention

Prosecutor

Coroner

Community Development

Utilities and

Waste Management

Public Health Services

Parks and Trails

WSU MC Extension

Total

Current (sq. ft.) I Projected (sq.ft.)

Allocation Need Deficit Deficit 2015 need 2020 need

2520

3,407

2,481

210

4,440

1,920

43%

4,074

667

16%

2,442

None

444

234

53%

4,218

4,296

1,gg8

666

4,440

4,518

1,998

666

215

2508

2199

2307

1318

2,925

3,508

2,190

62%

7,664

4,739

62%

4964

12,400

7,436

6o%

4,745

4,6o8

None

3,408 9,400

5,992

64%

5462

16,ooo

10,538

66%

19,315

63000

43,685

6g%

3,533

294

3,681

635

444

3,500

229

992

1832 None

52%

28%

3,398

1,091 32%

4,468

935

21%

744

450

6o%

5,550

1,86g

34%

1,554 919 59%

666

5,500

2054

3,620

4,618

8,774

16,6oo

5,052

12,200

18,ooo

71000

4,690

966

6,216

2,664

666

6,500

2276

4,892

5,728

13,162

21,200

5,496

15,000

20,000

766oo

5,406

2,188

7,104

3,330

3555

1,094

8,992

5,437

6o%

1,554

460 30%

11,656

1,776

14,098

1,gg8

2377 4,330 1,953 45%

73,1.53 1.64,346 9,1.:1.93

4,774

5,218 ss%

1.92,004 222,484

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998-

(updated March

20~5)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET

1

Capital

Name: Sheriff Evidence

Planning and Construction Level

Estimates:

Description: New evidence compound adjacent to public works department.

Justifications: Current compound is at old road shops, does not meet minimum regulations and is in poor condition.

Estimated

Preliminary Planning

Costs (in thousands)

20:1S

20:16

20:!.7 20:!.8 20:1.9

2020 Total so so

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction so

:1.,400 so

:1.,400

Total Costs:

:1.00 :1.,400

1.,5oo

Funding Source

In House

1.00 :1,400

1.,SOO

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: 1.00 1.,400 1.,soo

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 - (updated March 2025)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET2

Name:

Estimates: Planning and Construction Level

Description: Firearms range for law enforcement and publici would include pistol, rifle, trap, skeet, archery areas.

Justifications: Sheriff has indicated need as well and public saying a range is also a priority in the

2on parks plan.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Acquisition

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

25

85o so

350

25 1250

:1075

200

1275

85o

2S so

350

1275

:1075

200

1275

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET

:1

Name:

Estimates: Planning and Construction

Description: Various building improvements as perfacilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs

20:15

20:16

20:17

20:18

20:19

2020

22

22

22

22

79

79

281

79

28:1

79

28:1

281

382

382

382

382

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 -(updated March 2025) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET

:1.

Name:

Estimates:

Planning Construction

Description: Various building improvements as per facilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Costs

201.5 201.6

2017

20:18 201.9 2020

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

300

300

300

300

1.54

121.

154

121

1.54

121

154

121

575

575

575

575

66

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET

:1

Capital

Name:

Estimates:

Building #4

Planning and Construction

Description: Various building improvements as per facilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Costs (in

2015 2016 2017 201.8

201.9 2020 Total

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep

& Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

1.31 lJ:l

1.31.

6o

Go

6o l.3l.

Go

1.91 l.9::1..

191. l.9l.

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August/ :1998- (updated March 20:15)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET

:1

Name:

Estimates:

#6

Planning and Construction Level

Description: Various building improvements as perfacilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities} Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

40

53

40

53

40

40

53

53

93

93

93

93

68

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET

:1

Name:

Planning and Construction

Description: Various building improvements as perfacilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep

&

Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs

2015

20:1.6

2017

2018

2019 2020

Total

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

6g

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 -(updated March 2025)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS

&

TRAILS D EP AR TMENT

Name: REET

1

Capital

Name:

Estimates:

#8

Planning Construction

Description: Various building improvements as per facilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

2015 2m6 2017 2018 2019 2020

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

156

434

156

434

156

434

156

434

8o

8o

8o

6yo

670

6yo

670

70

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1.998- (updated March 20:1.5) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS

&

TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET

1.

Name:

Estimates: Planning and Construction Level

Description: Various building improvements as per facilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Project Costs (in thousands)

20:15 2016 20:17 2018 2019 2020 s6 sG s6 sG s6 sG s6 sG

71

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998

-(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET

1

Improvement

Name:

Estimates:

Mason

Planning

Jail

Construction Level

Description: Various building improvements as per facilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

Costs

2015 2016 2017 2018

2019

2020

495

495

495

495

93

93

93

93

8o

So

8o

So

668

66S

668

66S

72

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August/

1998-

(updated March

2015)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN VVORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET

:1

Name:

Estimates: Planning and Construction Level

Description: Various building improvements as perfacilities assessment, immediate goal is development of another courtroom and moving the Clerk to courtroom Band courtroom B to where the Clerk was.

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Estimated Project Costs thousands)

20:1.5

20:1.6

2017

2018

2019

2020

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep

& Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

122J.

234

261

:122:1

234

26:1

122J.

117

26J.

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

117

918

234

261

Totai

1,7J.6

1,716

J.,291

J.J.7

1,716

73

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998(updated March 2015)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET1

Estimates: Planning Construction Level

Description: Various building improvements as perfacilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

2015

20~6

20~7 20l8 2019 2020

77

77

77

77

33

33

33

33

~~0

1.1.0 n.o

1.1.0

74

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, :1998- (updated March 20:15)

Name:

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN VVORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

REET

:t

Improvement

Name: Improvements

Estimates: Planning and Construction

Description: Various building improvements as per facilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

20~5

Costs

2m6 2017 20:18 20:19 2020

Total

8

8

8

8

~52

152

1.52

152

332

332

332

332

492

492

492

492

75

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS DEPARTMENT

Name: REET1

Name:

Estimates: Planning and Construction Level

Description: Various building improvements as per facilities assessment

Justifications: Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Total

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

15

15

15

15

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 -(updated March 2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

FACILITIES, PARKS & TRAILS D EP AR TMENT

Fund Name: REET

1.

Name:

Planning and Construction Level

Description: Various building improvements to restore the historic Memorial Hall

Justifications: Building has not had any significant improvements since the structure was built in the :192o's.

Estimated Costs (in thousands)

20:15 20:16 20:17 20:18 20:19 2020

Preliminary Planning

Site Prep & Utilities/ Well

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs: funding Source

In House

Other

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

2:12.5

212.5

212.5

212.5

77

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1998 - (updated March 2015)

7. POLICE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FACILITIES

Capital Facilities

The Mason County Sheriff's Office provides police services including, patrol, traffic enforcement, service of civil process, jail operation and investigative services to the citizens of Mason County. The

Mason County Sheriff's Office currently has a total of

~09 employees. Ofthose54 are commissioned officers, 36are jailers, and

~gare civilian employees.

The Mason County Sheriff's Office currently serves 6o,6gg citizens. This number represents a 22.9 percent increase in population since 2000. The Sheriff' Office is responsible for covering an area of miles of county roads and nearly 115 miles of state highways.

The Mason County Sheriff's Office has taken over primary responsibility for traffic law enforcement and collision investigations on all county roads commencing

July~,

2009. Accordingly the Sheriff's

Office has established the Mason County Sheriff's Office Traffic Team as of January 1, 2008. The unit consists offive deputies and one Sergeant.

Mason County Sheriff's Office is assisted through mutual aid by the Shelton Police Department and the Squaxin Island Police Department. This low level of law enforcement is a distinction that separates us from our Region 3 and comparative counties who all have numerous agencies to provide mutual aid.

JAIL FACILITIES

The present Mason County Jail opened in

~986 with a population capacity of 45 inmates. In 1989, capacity was increased to

5~, and in 1991 it was increased to 58 beds with floor space for 106. In

~993 the average daily population (ADP) was 62. In 2004 the ADP was at 95- 46% over capacity.

The Direct Supervision Unit (DSU) opened on

October~,

2006, bringing the jail capacity up to n8 inmates. ADP for 2005 was

~11,

ADP for 2006 was 119 and ADP for 2007 was 113-7- On September

~s,

2009 DSU was closed after the jail had to reduce staff by five (5) FTEs bringing the jail's capacity down to 108 inmates. For the first eight (8) months of 2mo the ADP has stood at 103. Reductions in staff due to mandated budgetary cuts at the Sheriff's Office prompted the closing of DSU causing the reduction in jail capacity.

In

20~4, the Mason County Sheriff's Office implemented a plan to reconfigure the DSU facility. The reconfigured facility will house 42 inmates. In earlier comprehensive plans several critical maintenance issues were identified at the jail as needing immediate repair or replacement. They include new locks for the cells and cell blocks, leaks in the roof and the problems with the walkway between the court house and the jail. In 2m4 the jail received significant improvements including a new roof, new control system, and comprehensive update of the mechanical systems in the building. These issues have all been addressed by the Sheriff's Office, BOCC, and Facilities

Department.

Repair and maintenance needs of the jail are paint inside the cell blocks, booking area, the holding cells and floor. These areas have not received updated paint and the graffiti and wear do not y8

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March 2025) Capital Facilities conform to the best standards for care and custody as well as an acceptable work environment for staff .Despite multiple attempts to seal and repair leaks in the hallway between the jail and the courthouse water and white crystals continue to accumulate in that area and a solution needs to be implemented. The commercial grade washer and dryer are also nearing the end of service life and should be scheduled for replacement in

2016.

The Mason County Sheriff's Office is currently pursuing the completion of the jail redesign, installation ofthe video arraignment system, installation of an updated inmate visitation/telephone/commissary kiosk system and acquisition of a storage unit for the safe housing of supplies and equipment. After completion of the above mentioned areas the Mason County jail will have a total inmate capacity of

144.

It should be noted that inmate bed space should not be confused for total capacity. After completion of the redesign the total number of inmate beds will

be

1.1.3

1

an additionall2 in holding cells vvith another

19 using floor space for a tota! capacity of

144.

Though the maintenance updates and redesign will create efficiencies in the use of existing staff hours and have created a safer working environment for our jail deputies we are still at a lower overall capacity than the

160 plus inmates being housed in

2009 prior to the closure of the DSU.

NDING

The Mason County Sheriff's Office continues to explore alternative funding sources including

Federal Homeland Security Grants, Justice Assistance Grants, and grants from other federal, state, and private sources. However, like many other funding sources the amounts of these grants are being reduced or eliminated altogether. Additionally the Mason County Sheriff's Office is committed to forming community partnerships with public and private agencies to more efficiently provide services and utilize facilities to maximum efficiency.

SHERIFF'S FACILITY

The Mason County Sheriff's Office is currently housed at

322

North

3rd

Street in Shelton. The Office transitioned to this location from the Mason County Courthouse starting in December,

2009 and was mostly completed by February

2010.

Police Operations, Records, Finance, Administration, and

Evidence are currently housed at this facility. The acquisition of this facility has greatly enhanced the office's ability to perform its mission with much greater efficiency.

SPACE ALLOCATION CRITERIAAND MAINTENANCE

Standard space allocations methods do not apply to all areas of the Sheriff's Office because oft he diverse functions found within the department such as training, locker rooms, K-g holding, briefing room, interview rooms, public receptions, fingerprinting, criminal complaints, evidence processing and others. Space for many ofthe above mission essential functions is not adequate.

In

2013 an electrical fire caused the failure of one HVAC system on the roof of the Sheriffs Office.

This unit has not been replaced and the other units on the roof are ofthe same design and age. The workspace area that this unit serves does not have acceptable climate control for employees or the public. The carpet flooring in the Sheriff's Office is of unknown and shows extreme wear and tear. In many locations duct tape is used to repair seams and in others the carpet was cut out to accommodate construction. Replacement of the carpet must be considered for

2016 to maintain an acceptable and professional work space for employees.

79

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 -(updated March 2025) Capital Facilities

One ofthe men's bathroom urinals was removed in early 2024 and has yet to be replaced. A plastic bag continues to serve as the covering to the exposed plumbing.

To meet accreditation standards and safe workplace criteria a decontamination and eyewash facility needs to be installed or established in the Jail and the North and South Precincts. This can be completed in several ways to meet the standard and needs to be considered for the 2026 budget year in order to maintain accreditation and safety practices.

NORTH

NTY

The greater Belfair/Allyn area is quickly becoming a business and population hub in northeastern

Mason County. This area is quickly becoming a small city requiring a higher level of law enforcement and other governmental services. When the new sewer system is completed in Belfair, the area is expected to rapidly expand much like Silverdale did in the 2g8os .. The North Precinct was established in late 2023 and has made a significant impact on policing operations. In 2024 fully half of the patrol division and over 20 citizen volunteers staff this precinct. The building is currently contracted through the private sector and appears to meet the needs for the next five years in terms of projected police, investigative, and administrative functions.

N

The most important need of the Sheriff's Office is that of offsite evidence storage. Property taken in by the Sheriff's Office is held in trust by the Sheriff's Office. Therefore it is the Sheriff's responsibility to ensure its security, preservation, chain of custody, as well as its proper return, sale, or disposal according to law. Currently, most of the Sheriff's evidence is being held in a secured designated area at the Sheriff's located at 322 North 3rd St in Shelton. Many items continue to be held on the third floor of the Mason County Court House. Moving evidence items to the 3rd Street facility continues. All evidence items stored at the Court House were moved in 2on.

The Mason County Sheriff's Office also stores vehicles held as evidence, including homicide vehicles, and large evidence items at the old Mason County Public Works facility located on the

Johns Prairie Road. Additionally, bulky evidence and evidence that may be considered hazardous, is kept at this facility. Replacement of this facility is needed to ensure security, preservation, and chain of custody. The current facility does not meet industry standards for security, processing, preservation, environmental concerns and chain of custody. Through a massive evidence audit and purge in 2024 the Sheriff's Office will conform to an accreditation standard. However, the facility design and location continues to fall short of industry standards due to the remote location and ongoing security concerns. The BOCC and Facilities Department are exploring an option that would suffice as a temporary solution while a long term building design and location site can be determined to meet the expected growth over the next decades. This would be the first move of the offsite evidence site in nearly 40 years.

Additionally the Mason County Sheriff's Office must have covered secure storage for its three boats, light armored vehicle, all terrain vehicle, skid car and trailer, search and rescue vehicles, along with spare and mothballed patrol vehicles. Additional secure storage for other training equipment, tactical equipment, search and rescue equipment, and traffic radar trailers. The storage facility needs to be in a secure location that built to specifications that will not cause operational degradation. The current Johns Prairie location is regarded only as a temporary facility, as it is not equipped with running water. Permanent facilities had been planned for equipment storage and large evidence at the newly built public works facility however that plan was scrapped prior to

So

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August

1

2998(updated March 2025) Capital Facilities construction to bring the project in under the original budget allocation. Multiple BOCC briefings and discussions have taken place and continue to be pursued. The need is essential as the equipment stored is expensive and requires storage that allows for emergency response and reliability that the current facilities do not accommodate.

Fl

The Mason County SheriWs Office currently has no weapons training facility. The Mason County

SheriWs Office is currently dependant on the good will of the Department of Corrections which allows us to conduct quarterly training at their facility located adjacent to the Washington

Corrections Center. Future budget issues may create a situation where the Sheriff can no longer use the WCC facility or to have to pay high rental fees for the privilege of using the WCC facility. A shooting park or similarfacility has been discussed, but no action has been taken. Having a facility the SheriWs Office can utilize for firearms training is essential and planning should begin this year.

COURTS

The Mason County District courts handled

~0,238 cases in

20~3, mostly infractions and misdemeanors. Mason County Superior Court handled 2,689 cases in

20~3, with civil cases being the most common, followed by criminal actions, domestic cases, juvenile offender cases, and probate/guardianship cases, in that order. Additional information regarding the courts and annual case loads can be obtained at www.courts.wa.gov.

FACILITY NEEDS

The two most recent efforts to analyze county facility needs included the two following documents, which have been referenced previously in this section:

~)

Space Needs Assessment and Campus Master Plan for Mason County- completed in

November of 2008.

2) Mason County Existing Facilities Assessment- completed in 2on.

As has been stated earlier in the text, the 2008 report was completed prior to the great recession and prior to large layoffs that were implemented by Mason County. Some of the data is likely still valid but an update to County Facilities needs would be recommended, especially a report that identified new building needs or building expansion needs. The 2008 Facilities Master Plan did identify and recommend potential improvements that would add parking capacity, expand building

#~, build a new juvenile center, build a new justice center and enlarged the main County campus as an example. Options and phases were included. Revisiting the plan to determine ifthe findings are still valid would be recommended.

The 2m2 facilities assessment looks only at current building conditions and makes recommendations for renovations of existing infrastructure that is likely to fail in the future. The assessment serves more to recommend needed maintenance and upgrades as opposed to future building needs.

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

1998-

(updated March

2015)

8.

5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Capital Facilities

..

..

..

..

"

Storm and surface water management is an important government role that serves to protect and improve water quality and habitat, and reduce flooding. Mason County has taken several steps to implement a comprehensive, county-wide management approach including:

"

Adopting a county-wide Stormwater Management Plan in June

2008;

Adopting local stormwater management standards and by reference the

2005

Stormwater

Management Manual for Western Washington.

These standards are applied county-wide as of

June

201.2;

Adopting special Low Impact Development (LID) standards within the Belfair and Allyn UGAs in

June

2008 and encouraging where practical, county-wide;

Inventorying, assessing and maintaining stormwater systems within county right-of-way;

Planning, designing and constructing stormwater retrofit projects;

Adopting a Comprehensive Flood Management Plan;

Participating in, or leading fish passage improvement projects; and

Participating in, or leading regional planning strategies .

The County formed a Stormwater Task Force (SWTF) in late

2009 to make recommendations to the

County Commissioners on implementing the adopted stormwater management plan and related water quality initiatives. The SWTF met regularly between April

20:10 and June

201.2.

Final Task

Force recommendations to implement a "Clean Water Program" were presented to the County

Commissioners in August

20:12 along with a recommendation to establish a stormwater utility rate to fund the program. The Board too no action to establish a new revenue source to fund the "Clean

Water program".

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

The stormwater management system within Mason County can generally be described as "rural" or

"natural" even within designated urban growth areas (UGAs). Conveyances generally consist of ditches, swales and culverts, often located in highly permeable areas. A very small percentage of the overall system can be described as a typical municipal separate storm sewer (MS4) consisting of curb, gutter, catch basin, and piped conveyance. This type of system can be found, however, within sections ofthe Hoodsport Rural Activity Center (RAC) and Belfair, Allyn and Shelton UGAs.

Mason County is responsible for managing stormwater systems within County road rights-of-way and those associated with County buildings such as the Public Works site. Low Impact

Development (LID) features such as porous concrete, pervious asphalt, and rain gardens used to manage stormwater can be found at this location. The stormwater systems owned and managed by the County are inventoried, inspected and represented on a GIS layer.

The City of Shelton is responsible for the stormwater systems within City limits and the Washington

State Department of Transportation is responsible for the State highway stormwater system.

Private drainage systems exist throughout the County as well. These are owned and maintained by private property owners. A small percentage of the private stormwater facilities are inventoried and included in the GIS layer.

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August,

~998

(updated March

20~5)

Capital Facilities

Mason County is in the initial stages of stormwater capital facility planning. Identification of stormwater capital facility needs and projects comes from a variety of sources, including the adopted County-wide Stormwater Management Plan, water quality monitoring, habitat assessments and other Lead Entity activities, and Water Quality Improvement Reports.

Mason County participated in a Hood Canal regional effort to select, rank, and prioritize sites for future stormwater retrofit projects. A prioritized list and preliminary designs for top projects was completed in 20J.4, including two Mason County sites.

Project emphasis is on retrofits (those that address "legacy" problems) and can generally be grouped into the following three categories:

Water Quaiity

These projects are designed to improve water quality problems identified through monitoringi downgraded or threatened shellfish harvest areas, 303(d) listings, or Water Quality Improvement

Reports. Projects may consist of wet ponds, sand filters, constructed wetlands, vaults, or other

BMPs.

Flooding/Erosion

These projects will reduce the frequency and/or severity offlood and erosion damage to public and private property. Projects may include additional storage facilities, new or enlarged conveyances, channel stabilization, stream restoration, or reducing impervious surfaces.

Aquatic Habitat

Projects in this category are designed to maintain or enhance aquatic habitat, with an emphasis on salmon recovery and shellfish. These projects may include habitat surveys, culvert replacements, installation of in-stream structures, or removal of dikes.

All three categories of projects will typically require funding for planning, design, construction and land acquisition. It should also be noted that many projects will serve multiple purposes: for example, a project that includes storage for flood control will likely improve water quality through additional detention and settling of pollutant-carrying sediments.

LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS

New Development

As of June 2on, new development and redevelopment throughout Mason County must meet the minimum requirements of the

2005

Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.

In addition to these minimum requirements, Mason County Code J.4.48 spells out requirements for financial liability and J.7.8o requires Low Impact Development (LID) techniques within the Belfair and Allyn UGAs.

Conveyance

Mason County Code J.4.48 is silent to conveyance standards. However, Mason County Code J.6.48 states that all construction shall conform to the Washington State Department of Transportation's

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August

1

1998-

(updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

Standard Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Municipal Construction. Conveyances are typically designed to meet the 25-year storm event.

Retrofits

Most capital facility projects are considered

"retrofits~~ meaning the project is undertaken to correct or improve conditions associated with past development. Retrofits are designed using best professional judgment to provide reasonable improvements in stormwater management, recognizing that site constraints frequently make strict application of Best Management Practices

(BMPs) challenging.

FUNDING

Mason County has utilized a variety of revenue sources to fund stormwater management activities.

The majority of past funding has been from grants, but in recent years the Road Fund and Real

Estate Excise Tax (REET 2) have provided a base level of "development" funding and grant match until such time that a stable dedicated source is established. The Capital Facilities Plan Worksheet makes conservative revenue assumptions including:

• No Road Fund revenue

~

No REET2 revenue e

~

Minimal grant revenue to fund Hood Canal priority retrofit projects unless grants are secured

No stormwater utility rate revenue

A brief description of each revenue source is presented below.

Road Fund

The Road Fund provided $25,000 start-up revenue for stormwater program development and implementation beginning in 2010. This revenue source is used to leverage grant funding as a local revenue source is required for grant match (typically 25%).

Real Estate Excise Tax CREET2)

REET2 has been a revenue source used to fund capital construction and serve as grant match.

REET2 funds in the amount of $82,500 were allocated in years 2009 through 2012, and in the amount of $75,ooo in 2013. These revenues combined with grant funds were used to design and construct projects in Belfair, Allyn and Hoodsport to reduce contaminants and improve water quality. The revenue table assumes no REET2 funding through 2020.

Grants

Mason County has received approximately $1.1 million in stormwater management grants over the past seven years. Future grant availability is expected to diminish due to greater demand and competition, directing funds to jurisdictions under Municipal NPDES permit requirements (Mason

County is not a permittee), and an overall reduction in available funds.

The revenue table reflects that Mason County executed a grant with the Department of Ecology who will continue to perform work in years 2015 and 2016. Small grants are assumed for the years following.

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 -(updated March 2025) Capital Facilities

Stormwater Utility Rate

Mason County created a Stormwater Utility in June

2008 but did not establish a rate to fund stormwater management activities at that time. A Stormwater Task Force (SWTF) met regularly from April

2020 through June

2022 to develop program and funding recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. The SWTF recommended a stormwater utility rate be established to provide dedicated, predictable funding to implement an annual program of approximately $:!..43 million. A rate has yet to be established. ss

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 -(updated March 2025) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PUBLIC WORKS

Storm Fund

Name:

Estimates: Development Level

Description: This project worksheet includes costs associated with program implementation and the design/construction of stormwater retrofit projects. Program implementation activities include: education and outreach

1 capital facility planning, stormwater pollution

I orevention olans for Countv-owned facilities. technical assistance to orooertv owners. facilitv

I /

I

I I

I

I

inventory updates, and overall management. Stormwater retrofit projects will be rated and prioritized in the near future and individually identified in 6-year and 20-year CFPs.

Justifications: Clean water is vital to the health, economy and cultural heritage of Mason

County. Mason County government plays an important role in salmon recovery/ maintaining and improving shellfish harvest areas, flood control, and improving water quality as well as the overall recovery of Puget Sound. Implementing the stormwater management program and constructing stormwater retrofits is an important community investment yielding returns in the form of maintaining property values, generating fish/shellfish revenues and tourism and reducing health risks and costs.

Expenditures

Administration

Implementation

Plan/PreJim. Eng.

Design/Constr

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Ending Fund

Total Expenditures

Revenues

3 3

7

7

1.:12 1.1.0

3

7

20

3

7

3

7

20 1.0

36

231. so

1.61. so

1.06 so

51.

30

26

389 331

186

131 76

3

18

7

42

1.0 282

30 246

J. 576

51 1::1.64

Beginning Fund Balance

269 231

1.61. 1.06

Road Fund

REET2

Grants

Total Revenues

1.20 1.00

51 26

844

2S 25

25

2S

320

389 331

186

131 51

1164

86

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998(updated March 2025)

PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES

Capital Facilities

Mason County Public Works is responsible for engineering, construction, operation and maintenance of 640-miles of county roads. Currently the Department staff is based at the Public

Works Facility off of Highway

~01 just north of Shelton and the Belfair Shop in Belfair.

The Public Works Facilities provide for the majority ofthe current needs of the Department.

However, satellite facilities at different locations around the County and a new shop in Belfair will be needed to better support the Department's needs and improve the efficiency ofthe Department by reducing travel and transportation time for materials and equipment used for maintenance and construction project work.

8y

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March

2025)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PUBLIC \iVORKS

Fund

New Belfair Shop Project Name:

Estimates:

Description: The new Shop will include a work staging area, vehicle maintenance bay, crews lunch/meeting room, restrooms & shower facilities, offices, vehicle and equipment storage and materials storage. For the immediate future, the existing building requires a upgrades to insure functionality. In

2016, new windows will be installed and updates to the office area and restrooms will be made.

Justifications: The current Belfair Shop is located in a residential neighborhood adjacent to

Hood Canal and does not have its own water source. The Shop is hooked up to the neighbor's welL Public Works is currently evaluating other sites for placement of a new shop, including an area at the new Belfair Treatment Plant.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Preliminary Engineering

Site Preparation

Utility Install

Well Drilling

2S so 200

7S so

2S

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Cost:

:iS

100

115 25

so

:10

360

25

1000 :1100

:l02S

Total

27S

7S so

2S so

1575

Funding Sources:

In House

:11:5

25

so

360 1.025

157S

Grants

Loans

Total Funding

115 25

so

360

1025

1575

88

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March 2025) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PUBLIC WORKS

Project Name:

Estimates:

Satellite Maintenance Yard

Level

Description: Public Works will be developing selected sites at various locations across the

County to better serve the requirements of maintenance activities. The planned development would include upgrades such as: clearing and grading

1 installing wells and water systems, installing electric power to support site services, constructing equipment/materials storage buildings and facilities, paving storage sites and developing roads on the properties.

Acquisition of individual properties will supplement existing property holdings to provide for uses such as sites for stormwater treatment facilities and disposal sites for ditch spoils and slide materials from maintenance or construction excavations.

Justifications: The changing mandates and requirements of road maintenance necessitate the expansion

I

upgrade of certain facilities, while the need to develop stormwater detention facilities and ditch spoil disposal sites require the purchase of property in specific locations.

Preliminary Engineering

Construction Engineering

Construction

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2ms

2016

2017

2m8

2019

2020

10 ~0 ~0

Total Cost:

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding: l.O

10 l.O l.O

10 l.O l.O

10

10

Total

30

30

30

30

8g

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998 -(updated March 2025)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN V/ORKSHEET

PUBLIC VIORKS

Project Name:

County Road Fund

Pole Barn Structure at Shelton-Matlock Road

Planning Level

Description: The County Road Fund owns property on Shelton-Matlock Road that is currently used as a fenced materials and equipment storage yard. The construction of a Pole Barn type structure on this site will help to facilitate the efficient deployment of crews and equipment to the south end of the County, particularly during snow and ice conditions. The price below reflects a fully enclosed metal structure.

Justifications: Currently crews assigned to maintain, plow and de-ice the south portion of the

County must go to the Central Shop to get the equipment needed to respond. When doing scheduled maintenance in the south end, crews travel to and from the Central Shop, transporting heavy equipment, vehicles, tools and materials needed for their work. One of the

Road Department's long range goals is to consider placement of satellite maintenance yards in key locations throughout the county to improve response and efficiency.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015

2016

2017 2018 2019 2020

Preliminary Engineering

Site Prep

&

Utilities so

25

Construction Engineering

Construction

Total Costs:

5

20

250

Bo

2]0

Total so

25

25

250

350

Funding Sources:

In House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

8o

270

Bo

270

350

350

90

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1.998- (updated March 201.5) Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PUBLIC WORKS

Name:

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: The old Public Works Facility was equipped with an existing structure that was used to store sand and salt used for winter storm events. The structure was something that could not be moved to the new Public Works facility.

Justifications: In order to protect the sand and salt from wintry weather (water & freezing) at the new Public Works Facility it will be necessary to hire a contractor to fabricate a new sand and salt storage facility.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources: ln House

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

225

225

225

225

Total

225

225

225

225

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 2998- (updated March

2015)

Capital Facilities

2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WORKSHEET

PUBLIC WORKS

Fund: Road to Water

Estimates: Construction Level

Description: The Public Works Department, via agreement with the Squaxin Tribe in

2007, committed to connecting its facility to the City of Shelton Water System when it becomes available and discontinuing use of the well (for all but non-potable uses). The City of Shelton has a planned project, beginning in

2014, to provide City water to Public Works Drive.

In order to satisfy the terms of the agreement with the Squaxin Tribe, it will be necessary to hire a contractor to connect the facility to the City Water System, to make any revisions to the on-site system to accommodate the change, and to pay any associated connection fees.

Estimated Project Costs (in thousands)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Construction

Total Costs:

Funding Sources:

In House

120

120

120

Grants

Loans

Total Funding:

120

Total

120

120

120

120

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August, 1.998 - (updated March

2015)

10. FINANCE PLAN

Capital Facilities

This section discusses Mason County capital facilities needs and related funding sources. As required under the Growth Management Act (GMA) a six-year finance plan has been prepared for the years 2015 to at least the year 2020 for those facilities currently, or to be, owned and operated by the County.

The following facilities are included in the financial planning:

'" Water and Wastewater Systems

);-

Belfair Sewer 20 Year Finance and Rate Forecast

);-

Cost Calculations for Build Out

);-

Real Estate Excise Tax 1(REET1), REET 2, and .og Sales Tax Revenues.

(Appendix A)

'" Solid Waste Management Facilities

Buildings

'" County Administrative and Law

" Stormwater Facilities

'" Public Works Facilities

'" Parks and Recreation

Only County owned and operated facilities, except for the community-based wastewater systems for rural activity centers, are included in the finance analysis. Several alternatives have been suggested to deal with the problem of providing water and wastewater service in areas outside the existing utility service area in which growth is forecast. The service area for the solid waste utility is county-wide.

The finance plan identifies reasonably reliable funding sources, and forecasts revenue and expenses to at least the year 2020. Funding varies depending on the facility. The different financing methods, public or private, could have significant implications on the cost of utility service.

Potential funding sources that could be used to fund unanticipated needs and shortfalls are also discussed.

FINANCIAL IMPACT OVERVIEW

The financial impact for capital facility improvements have been analyzed for the six year planning period. Information on transportation can be found in the Transportation Chapter. A summary of the six year improvement costs, revenues and financing is listed in Table 10-1. The Table displays the cost by capital facility category. The total of improvement costs and expenditures is Shown in

Table 10-1.

93

Mason County Comprehensive Plan

August/ 2998(updated March 2025)

TABLE 1.0-1.

CAPITAL FACILITY IMPROVEMENT

&

FINANCE COSTS 201.5- 2020*

Capital Facilities

Water & Wastewater Systems

Solid Waste Management

County Administration

Stormwater

Public Works (Road Funds)

Parks & Recreation

Total

*in thousands

20640

1.458

71.70

1.164

21.80

1.1.208

20640

1458

71.70 n64

2180

1.1208

43,820

AND SYSTEMS

The County owns and operates water systems that serve residents in Beard Is Cove and the

Rustlewood subdivisions. The County also operates water treatment facilities for Rustlewood and

Beard/s Cove. There is no expected expansion in any of the service utility areas with the exception of the Belfair sewer. A plan has been developed for sewer expansion to serve the entire Belfair

Urban Growth Area by

2025 and an accompanying financial plan and rate structure is being developed to accommodate this growth.

Facility worksheets provided in Section 4 summarize the planned water supply and sewer system capital improvements over the next six years.

20640

1458

7170

11.64

21.80

1.1.208

43,820

SOLID WASTE

Facility Worksheets provided in Section 4 present revenue sources and expenditure levels for Mason

County solid waste services from

201.5-2020.

MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES

Any necessary or proposed improvements to municipal buildings and law enforcement facilities are provided in the worksheets in Section 7 for years

201.5-2020

94

Li) c rl

ro

o

> ~

~ ~

..C-o

.....

a.ro

E

...,

-ol

0 a_ u 2

>'

§

~~

0 rl u c

~

0

::J

V1

0

ro

::J

~<(

V1

<II

:-e

u

ro

lL

"Ci.l

ro

u

' c _

;Beg; nnO\gFundBalance350·000.QOO

' Reserved Fund Balance

)Tota l Beginning Fund Balance

--

--

--·· _

__ _

2014 _

Budgeted Actual

I

$348,473 1 $2.453,5321

I

$1.761,0951 $1,211,7861

I

$215,011

I

$21 5 ,011

I I

$215,011

I

$215 , 001

I

I

$563,484

I

$2,668,543

I I

$1,976,106J $1,426,787

S873,ooo

1

5554,599

$2,500 : $2,069

[REET 1 Funding Budgeted

, Interest In come

Grant Fund iiiG=-c ourthouse I

Grant

~Ufl _ dh~lg

·Memorial

Hall/

Grant Fu ndin g -Sheriff Rrearm Range j_ Loan Fund i ng · Jail

I

t OECB

Bonds

!

:a n of cOmm e rce

Grant-

~~ j ~o nd

- ---- -

f un di ngcontro l upgrade and OSU f Tr;ansfe r in From Swift & Certa in

1_ ~ ~ ~:!i_~-~~l _ ng R~9uire<:i _

for Plan

To ta l Resources

-

oenditures/

!

l nterfund Paymentfor

S:::'rv.:: l =ces=--,-

-~ _!!_~ _ on euil dl:~aiiB

(

Bond Debt Serv i ce 2008 GO

Bonds

3rd & Plne

!_Jail Paymen t

Trans fe r oul to Jail Bond Fund 250 -

Transfer out to Fadlities -Maintenance Al lowance

$517,000

$1,610,000

$499,950 • $499,500

$75,000

$600,000

$4,740,934

I

53,724,711

$2,100

$37,924

$311,51 :

---~ ~~.2

_ 15

$1,185

$37,924

_ $268_(~7_4

$442,750 ' $307,584

" $0

I

$537,714

1!lli! f!!n

~ ~

~

Total

I · s1.2ii.786

I

$215,011 I $215,011 I $215,011 · $215,011

I

$215,011

I

$2!5

, 0 1: i

$752,725

1 {50 1 1

~

(SO il !S

O l i $0

I

$215,011

I

$215,011 " j . $215,011

I

$215,011

I

$1,426,797

S425,ooo

I

5425,< s1.ooo

1

51

$146,ooo

1

S146.ooll

.I

52;13~2

.

$2,s48,1os

1

St.~98,78!.

s2 , 62s , ooo

$37 ,92 41

S3o4.512

$37,924

I _

$304,s1: s21o ,6n

1

$294,672 s1oo.ooo

I s1oo.ooo

_17_13,108

I

$737,108

1

'c

$495,000 so · r

$575,000

!

$1,505

$117,000

$200,000

$600,000

$430

$650,000

$43o-

n

$700, (

$430 ha___

;..L;L.1,UUU

I

S75o,ooo

S43o

I

S3.7oo.<

I -

S4.ns

$117,000

"_!

I

$2Ci0,000,

$213,000

$495,000

So so

$0

$14&.ooo ,

S2.o11,92o

1

_g ,810,150

S146,ooo .

J S146,ooo

1

.

:

Ss68,542

1

$782,725

I

.

5217,645

·I

··~

.

1

To

·----sss4:oo i> r ss ,716,8 32 _ i

$1,_52!1,983_ l I

I

$1,794,166

I ..

$ 1, 346,086

I

$965,441 $12,456,854

_L

$l,100

$37,924

I i

"

$297,511 I s2,1oo

$37,924

I

$2,100 i ·

·

si,1oo

I

$37,924 '

$37,924 I

1

Si80,511 • $273,86 1.1 $272,449

>294,604

j s1oo.ooo

I

$732,140.1

:

$289,437

I

$289,269 Sl42,6o2

$609,972 ! $603,155_l $455;075

$2 , 1 00

$37.924 i

!

$275,868

$140,13• d -

$456,026 i

$10,500

$227,544

$1,704 ,71 2:

so

$1,450,719

$200,000

$3,593;475

pitallmprovement ProJects

' Oakland Bay P ark Property Acqu ls lti

SheitontoBe itarr · frafr

T rail

I

Sheriffs

Office Ev i dence

Fadlit~

' Sheriff & PUblic Firearms Range

·· suudliii

1n 1

)u ilding 1#3 I

~ BU ilding

114

I

Building 1161

Bullding#171

Building

liB

I

Buitdingll91

J.li

ll

.fiiil

Cou rthous e 1

JiJVeliiieDete ntlon

I

Sheriff"s Office l mpr

Public Works Building

:tf

Memorial Ha ll Improv ements

G" ~ l [~~t}_fe lls

J a il

Conlrol Pane l

$0

. $50,000

$1

$1:

S3oo : ooo

_$4 0,000 .

$156,000

t,081,190 ' $1,668,859

$303,000

$32,000

· $2§,108

$8,000

___:_1

$425.<

$425,000

-so-

$50,000 sse.

< $50,000 $50 , 000 ; $50,000 sso.ooo S3oo,ooo

" $100 .

000 $400,<

$1,250,

----s79.i

$500,000

$1,275 ,000

$25,000

$22 ,000

~3oo:-ooo

~131,000

$60,000 c $281,000

$154 , 00 121,000

$382,000

$575,000

$191,000

$4J

$40,000

$15Ei,OOO

$53,oo0

$2,000

$434,000

$56,0 · ·· ·

5495,000 $80,000

_ $93 ,000 ss.ooo

_ ~

$152,000

J

. • ...

T

$77,000 t

$234,000 I $261,000

..

-~,

·I

$33,000

I

I

$332 .

000 ,

I "'

.

<· $15 , 000

$80,000

$93,000

-=s2:"aiii f

$670,00(

--ssG , ooc

S668;"00£.

$412,331

$1,716,000

I

$110,000

$492.000

$15,000

$425,000

$425,00

$96,62ll "

$95 ,6~ so_l_~soa,954

~

I .

SZ.6.zs.ooo

1

S2,863,ooo

I.

·-· s7os , oooJ~ 7 6,ooo l .

$676,ooo

l

$5o ,ooo _}8,403,954

S3oo.ooo 1 $193,525

S3oo.oool_

_ $1,74 8

_?3A92,190

I

$1,99 0,341 _

!

Total Planned 1

E0di~ FUild"ialam:e

$4,134 ,940 I " $2,297,92 4

S6os,994 1 $1,426,787

$713,108

$ 1 ,834,998

I

$1,246,062

I

$2,625,ooo

I

$3,s9s,14o

1

$1,314,972

$1.579,155 1 $1,t31 , o7s

$5061026

su;ss7 ,428

1

$752 , ns so

1

$215,011 $215,011 1 $215,011 i

521s.ou $459,416 $459,416

Total uses

I * Em e r g e ncy GO B ondP ay me nt Fu n dO nlv

I

.$4, 740,934 1 $3 ,72 4,:

I _ _ j _

$2,548,1 06

1

$2,625,000 1 $3,810,150 , $1,52!1,983

__

_ _ _ i . _ _ _ _ .___ -

L __

1

$1,794.166

1

$1,346,086 '

I I

_ GO Bond for 3 rd

&

Pine Building

-Interest only Paymentul\til2013.

Full Payments f r om

2013 on.

.. .

!P

~ rchase ~fiow~i ldin~ ~ fro m

Road

Fun d .

is i 609,197 .

~_?.

_ @ ~:_2 7 % for 20ye;:~ r s ~~ yment sch~u !

ed to · l ;~~~P ayments

begin

201 1 and end 2031

.

. --· -

$965,441 $12.4

56,8 44

---

--·-·/

-~ ~

1./")

O"l

1./") rl

0

"

.!::!.

rt"l

c

ro

Vl rl o a: "'

> :::

~~

..C-o

<lJ <lJ

..... +'

O..ro

u 2

>-•

~ ~!

;;) 0"1

0 rl u ...,c

V1

0 ;;)

V1

0

ro

::>

~<(

V1

<lJ

:E

·c;

ro

LL

ro

+'

·a..l

ro

u

I

~

-

' Beg FUn d Balance 351:000-000

!

REET 2 Funding B ud ge t ed

I

In terest I ncome

Tota l RE ET 2

-----

P l an

ZlM

1, 0 87, 686

Actual

877,556

32 5 , 000

4,550

554 , 599

964

1,417,23 6 1,433,119

--

Other Revenue Sources REET 2

Sunset Bluff

Pari ~

Acquisition

&

Dev

Watson

Wildwood Cou nt y Park

Union Boat

Ra mp ·

·

Sandhi ll Park RCO Grant

---- -

-

9.416

-

Harvey Rendsland Park

Phi lli ps L

Oakla nd Bay Par k

1-:-:---.

- -

Mena rd s landing

McRA inlprovements

....

_ ___ ___

, ,

__ _

Maso n Lake Boat launch Ren o va tio ns

- - - ····

...

---·

25o:Ooo

- - ····

----

Boating RCO G rant

Foo t h ills County Park

=,.---

- .• 30, 000 i

--··

Walker Park Impro vements

North bay Trail

Allyn by the Bay Park

400,000

--

Kennedy Creek Trail Project

Union Park I mp ro ve ments

NM Soccer Footba ll Field

Water Spraypark Grant

·---

Belfair Sl<ateparl< R CO Grant

Add ' ( Fund in g Required for P l annnnn

----

--

--

Tota l Resources

680,000

2,097 ,236

9,416

1,442,53 5

-------

Budgeted

1,063,017

425,000

2,500

1,490,51!

· a

1 ,4 90 , 517

2015

Antici(;!ated

Plan

1.370,023

425 ,000

2 , 500

1,797,523

I

-----

0 1

--

--·····

300,000

175,000

~---·

I 37s.ooo

I

J

!

2016

Plan

I 2017

I

Plan

D l:

0

575,000 !

600,00 0 o ,

O l

575,000 '

600,000 !

3oci ; ooo

117,000

! f

30,000

!

!

· 1 ; 130,000 --

-

.

..,..

__

·'·

75,000 i

!

740,000 -

I

-----

2018

Mru!

Plan

0

650,000

O :

650,000 I

Plan

Plan To ta l a ·

700,000

0

O i

1 , 370,023

750.00~

I 3,700,000

2,500

100,000

I

1 so,ooo

I

5,on,523 i -

..

-~r-3 75 ,000 '1

----- - -

375,000

I

I

!

2020

2015-2020

0

600,000

175,000

117,000

I i l

......

.... _ 1 _ _ _ ____ ___

-25 0 ,000

--

..

~

75,000

0

62S,OOO f

0

' i70:0oo

0

I

1,130,000

0

0

· 70 , 000 1

500,000 o

--

~

- .

250,000 ' r·

----· iso .

ooo .

75,000 .

1 , 725.ooo

I

1,075,000

I

173,000

!

· 3 , 552.000 1,058,ooo

!

1 ,797 , 523 ; 1,075,000 . 4,127,000

1,65s, ooo i

I

I

·l

148.ooo 1

· 1 2s,ooo

I

648,000 1so,ooo

I

1 ,2 98 , ooo

I

1,4 50,000

-

0

-.70,000

500,000

---

0

250,000

I

150,000

2,246,000

O j 7,083,000

1 so , ooo

I

12,155,523

I.D

0"1

C:\Userslfpinter\Desklop\CFP\1 08 15 R EET 2.x

l s1 0815 REET 2 .

x ls

21612015

Lt'\ rl

0

"'

""'

Vl

QJ

:~ u ro lL ro

·a_. ro u c

Vi rl ro o a: "'

QJ.£:

> ~

'Vi t'tJ

g:;~

.£:-o

QJ QJ a.ro

E

-ol

0 a_ u 2

>' c

(I)

:::J

(I)

0 rl u c t;

0

:::J

Vl

0 ro

::o

~-a:

I

=-

2015-2020

-

I

Plan

2014

_···r Actual

~udgeted

___ _ ' I I

2,1oo

! -

···--~

I

2015

Antici p ~

.....

I

..-..

1

' Phillips Lake Par k

I 16,925 - - - ·

Sunset B l uff Park Acquisition & Dev

Watson Wildwood County Park

Union Boat Launch

SandiiTri Co;J;;"ty Park __

Harvey Rends land Park Plan/Design

Oakland Bay Park

Menard's landing Park

•. _

I

O j

!

55 , 587

I I I I

~u,u~

,

300,000 ' ---

-M

0

I

10,000 ,

I

~

0 I

0 '

I

··l!'lason County Recreation Area

Via

son

lal<e County Park

,Jacoby Park

Foothills County Pari<

I Wall<erParl<

1 bay Trail

De~e l opment

• Allyn by the Bay Par k

· Kennedy Creelc .

Trail Project

Un i on Park

IN M soccer Football Field

Water Spraypark

Belfair Skaiepark

Drainage/Nordstrom

I

Harvey Rendsland Park

Sheriff and

P~hli

c l Park

Firearms Range

TransferOuttofacilities

Sidewalks ,p ark in _i!~

Total All Expenditures

End ing Fund Balance

_

I

_ __ ,

---s60, ooo ' l coultercreek ParkAcquisition & Deve l opment - - ·--

_ .. _______ _ _ _

I

0 ·

45,000

30,000 o

50,000 o

I

- - · -

·

---J

I

- - -

575,000

I - - -

l -·--·-l

+

·

~~

- - l===j

I

~:_

575,000

= .. _._. _·. _.

I

'

~J.~W

1 u.

; ;; , . j . · ·· -

! 1 .26

o ,oool •

I

-·-

50,000

_

-1-:-~_(lo.ooo

· · 600-:-oOO ·

T -

195,000

3 -

70,00 0

6s:oo()

1 f

298,000

.

·----

-

I

1

I

I

I

±

~ -1,26o,ooo

1 ..:.

1 , 000 ,000

258,000

1,095,000

298,000

995,000

50,000

I

670,000

___

~-

,

0 , o i

.

- --. - - · ·

L _

_:_j

I

:

!

500,000

I

300,000

I ·

I

I

1.,ooo.ooo

I

'

.

·· 1 · - , -··· ·

·-

-

··-

368 , 000 i;ooo,ciocl"'

500,000

300,000

I I

I

~

--·

I

I I I

0

.

.. .

- - ... · 0 - -

· ·

1 --.-

I

~-

....

· 25,000

··-

-1

50,000

I

1 1

•u~,~~ J ~"':'·~~~ I

:

25,000

1,047,1 0 0 72,512

1,050,136 1,370,023

~ .... ,... .... ,..,..., I w,uw ' l

.,,..

,.,,..,.. ....

!U,UUU

s o5 ,5t7J 1,112 ,523

!

1

I

68 5 ,oooT 685 ,000

T

1,075, 000

I

4,127, 000

I

+

O l

''

· o

I

1 ,658 , 000

I

I

I

O j

1,298,000

. I) _-

· - - -

1.450

,0 00

0

·

0

- - 0

0

-.. ------1 l,_(JO,OOO

10,000

0

10,293,000

750,000 .

1 .

1,862,523

100,000

750,000 12,155,52 3

Total Uses

2,097,236 1 , 442,535 1,490,511T 1,797 ,523 1,075,000 4,127 ,000 1,6 58,0 00 1,298,000 1,4 50 ,000

40,000

800,000

350,000

234,000

10,000

75,000

Total

Notes: I nterest is computed on the ac tu al balance afthe fund (Be ginn in g Balance & Month l y Revenue} at a r ate of 1.4% through 2017

Notes: Any Reserve funds for financial ob li gations are considered part of beginning fund balance

& allocat e d d u ring t h e previou s yea r' s bud get process. The y are then e>Cpended durin g that budget year and should b e included In the inte rest computation. GO bond is paid in June and December .

C:\Users\fp i nler\DesklopiCFP\1 0815 REET 2 .

x ls1 08 15 REET 2.xls 2/612015

,.....

(I) l.r) rl

0

"'

"'

e l i )

-

ro '"'

(lJ ..C

.

:::

~

ro

2

"0

V\

(lJ

:~

·c:;

ro

LL

ro

.-t=

0..

1 u

. . .

. :: :: :' : :,: ::: ::: . .· : :M~~~ : ~~J~Y. R:Ji:ij:j : ~~~~ (fi$c ; ~~ h:·~M ~ : ¢~ ~ ~~~ n m~~~~¢~¢~i~:J:>:t ~ ~ : ®.

: ~~*~ii.~

, > :, : , : . . .

.

.

.. · .· .· .

..

;;) ;:, :'

1:[:UUE U HW'Ji~l!l

U l!l

!!

!

:!: !!

:mm!HH!

l i!

ki>~}i1fi i ~d U! 'l !~~W>i;i:W~i !H

R.~ii~~~~f,[email protected]~~~HEHHH<U:

!Hi!!! :: ,;: , ;,:/ 1!

: , < :: :: :: ::: :: ::u: : H!( !

Beg i nn i ng Ba l a n c e s1 3 1, 25 1 U 57 , 04 9

E!i!l

ii\!iitP.P.f\WK~ ~ i~i !

!{M~tN ;: /J: mUf.

~ ~ i~ki : .. < :L wi~s'

In te re st In c ome 4 00 27 9 t.~ ~i :~~ ~m;~ n-;;: : ::::: : : :: L: ::: :.

: ,· : iHiml': 1 ~si!ijli4a2.H

:: ::

: n~~J 9.s

i' :

$.<~ n:Mi\!MJ.!ii~!¥ H:!CU: :

;; ; ;;;;·:y :;' (?>< :: <H ! : :.:

i

::

::.\L

'

·'

l n terf u nd C hg for Se rvices 2 ,100

0

~ @[email protected]~liM9.~fuJirl~!¢.# ~ @ l HU! 1UH HU :W.

~~19~i!

!

1 : : :1::::: ~8~Aii~d

I m pr o v e S he lt on Wa s t e Facilit y

~~ l ffi:!M~~~~f.ii~W*'~~g~)a.®.JW!1!i:11U!

' : ~ #ji# 9~

::: :: m: :::H:w::U A !

I mprove S he lt on T ransf e r St a t i on

~~Y.i

~f~fi!i#~H:[email protected]!~~~i!S.

' ~Wjif1!!

H i!

1H !

m : ::: ::H:!

wm~ :t :t: H !#~i~~~ :

Tota l P lann ed Expenditu r es $ 51 9, 3 4 2 s 19 2,242 t!*[email protected] !

~~~iMi i ~ F.!

M !

ni :'

; ;,::, :) ·: :

!H~~ *i.~?

:: : :: :U: AA%ii~¥ :

Tota l U ses

$ 5 87,4 92 $678, 953 hWHH ~li¥.

H YH! !i:!fY

~ U!H H !:l f: !A

~# ' U!:H: : U :Um ~: u:: : : :::::: # \#.~ !

21 ~ 'U:g:: HU#~ ~ 4.[~ # !iTI

I

I

To t al

I r:mw:::mm : ::::: ::::: : :: m::: ::: :m:::: : :::ma

I

$4 86 , 71 2 s 4 5 6, 1 92 s 3 4 7.3

19 $3 95,0 5 6 $4 77.3

77 $571 , 283 s 571 , 283

I

I :Hi' i!HH!

s ~ 9m M : !!

H U ::!

!!i

ili~ ~k~ @ EFC i !

~ 4.

~i~ii~ UH ::::;

: gg 91 # M

i: i !!

H H:!

s~ · @!~~ : : ::::: : ::H i $i #l~ P.

~ !H!!U~i\@i ~ i?AI

1

162 25 0 3 00 325 3 5 0 37s s 1,76 2

I

LH'!~9.li

~J~ i.4

i !ln!!!

l }~ ~~ JAA~: U U !

~ Mi~ l¥ 9 !! '!UU

~M ~ ~~ i [ !l

!

l!~ ~ ~ ~p )z#z ! t !H#1¥.~ii~~ : ::r m;~~ii#.~~:t

I I

1 n::::u

:m.: uu ,, ,., ,. ..

.. ,, ,, ,,, ,, , ,,, , ,, , ,,

I n:m::: ~~ ~ ~~l?§ • lH:::::m: ~ ~a.

H ?:# ~ : uu: n :m : uun ~<?n :: ::::: :n m:m: n @ ' :ummn:::u : : ~ ~:

I

[if

23, 000

I

1.oo

,oo o

rn:

::nn::t~M~

: ::::

:::m: ~~:1i ¥ ~~ u ::: :: m

I

U!!Hi

~*l~#hll

I

L1ii ::i'i<iie~ :::H~~J~9#lO:#!;!:I

I

::M Mj

:m :: u:m~~l ~ #.4 :tH : t:: H:U #~ M.% : : :: u: : : U:i~~; s.

~ ;: :n ~: ::m~ii~?:ll

1

s 540,682 s 639 ,12 3 s4 92,563 s4 68,o o4 $4 66, 444 s464 , 922 s 2 , 9 4 s , 73s

1

t:::

:U : [email protected] ~ ~ ~iJ ~~~ : !i!

H!l~ ~~~;~~~ : : H !

U :U :[email protected] ! :uu : :~ ~wM~! : H i ~§ i ~~n~ : ; H<!i; ~ ~~;@J

I

$ 996,8 7 4 $9 86 ,44 2 $8 87 ,6 1 9 $ 9 4 5,38 1 $ 1,037 , 7 27 U ,141,658 $ 3 , 83 3 ,045

I

:M#.~~:[email protected]~.Yf#<f~~m#.~ : ;iM1~~~~; .

m: ~ @rf.4r~~%¥:t.f¥i¢.!iiii

: PJsW~iiii41kr:[email protected] jt.

#.~ ~x.

~ ~ ~~;x h ' ~~1*[email protected] :#[email protected]!~li# .li

&: ~ &tr~ t ¥.'~~ ;::::m::::Hm•mu:H ; l::: .

,: :·:::·:· ·:'.

' ::.

Unde r c ur re n t funding l e gislation , the .

0 9 Sales Tax Credi t fo r Rural Cou n ties

w ill

e nd in the year 2 03 2 .

P#[email protected]~i.i/##~w;.#.#~;¢;@~f>.!t.~#.®.

~ S.!.#.~i# i ii# ii nw~~i1#J#@~#~~¥MJ.# # ##i~~~ ~WA#t~ ~ M#[email protected]#~#~f4#@#i#.{~ @ !f!!W4.#m # P.

t 9# !!.

.ii#iki '!ii1i ; :;: ;:;,;:;·;:,:.:.: . ,: : :: :: : ••\: : ::::::·, , ,,.

_

N o ve mb ers , 2 0 :1.3 M ason County Comm i ssioners approve d a n a dditional $2:J.s,oo o for 20:1.3

&

a n addi ti onal SS:t25 , oo o for

20:1.

4 ,

a nd SJ so,ooo for 2o :J.sfor the Belfair Waste w ater

W a te r Re clama t ion S yst e m.

.

-~ · -

.

..

..,..~ .

.j co

O'l c

0

V\ ro

:::>

2<{

L/) n

0

N

-;:::.

Was this manual useful for you? yes no
Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Download PDF

advertisement