- No category
advertisement
APPENDIX P – SOUND RESULTS
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1
2
3
4
5
Building ID
6
7
8
9
10
Close door
Don't close door
Figure P99. Summary of occupants’ responses on the perception questionnaire concerning closing of a door to gain privacy in their work area.
NCEMBT-080201 343
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Summary of Calculated Values.
Q1.
D BA B UMPS
These data are used to describe sound level measurements for various frequencies that exceed the levels of their immediate neighbors by the variances shown below. Items that equal or exceed the variance are identified with the value of 1 otherwise they contain the value of zero.
Description Field Name Columns
1/1 octave band, 4dB variance
1/1 octave band, 6dB variance
1/1 octave band, 8dB variance
1/3 octave band, 4dB variance
1/3 octave band, 6dB variance
1/3 octave band, 8dB variance
DBA11_63_6 through DB11_4000_4
DBA11_63_6 through DB11_4000_6
DBA11_63_6 through DB11_4000_8
DBA13_63_6 through DB13_8000_4
DBA13_63_6 through DB13_8000_6
DBA13_63_6 through DB13_8000_8
7
7
7
22
22
22
Q2.
D BC
See SPL_C in raw data (Float)
Q3.
D BC D BA
Use SPL_C - SPL_A in raw data (Float)
Q4.
NC – N OISE C RITERIA
NC selects the highest measured sound level that fits within a standardized sound level.
NCMax stores the maximum sound level found. (Float)
NCFreq stores the frequency where this sound level was found. (Integer)
Q5.
NCB – B ALANCED N OISE C RITERIA
NCB is one method to determine if rumble and hiss exist in a sound sample.
SIL stores the Sound Interface Level used to select the NCB reference level for rumble (Float)
NCBRumble stores a 1 if rumble is detected otherwise a 0 (Integer)
NCBRefHiss stores the NCB reference level for hiss (Integer)
NCBHiss stores a 1 if hiss is detected otherwise 0 (Integer)
344 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q6.
RC – R
OOM
C
RITERIA
RC stores the RC table level that is used for analyzing hiss and rumble (Float)
RCRumble stores a 1 if rumble is detected otherwise a 0 (Integer)
RCHiss stores a 1 if hiss is detected otherwise a 0 (Integer)
Q7.
RC M ARK II (RCII) A LTERNATE R OOM CRITERIA
RCII is another derivative that analyzes rumble, hiss and an intermediate quality descriptor named roar.
RCII stores the RC table level that is used for analyzing hiss, rumble and roar (Integer)
DeltaLF stores a cumulative difference between the table and the measured low freq values (Float)
DeltaMF stores a cumulative difference between the table and the measured med freq values (Float)
DeltaHF stores a cumulative difference between the table and the measured high freq values (Float)
RCIIQual stores the indicator for the highest Delta, 0=none, 1=LF, 2=MF, 3=HF, whenever DeltaMax is greater than 5 (Integer)
DeltaMax (QAI) stores the largest difference between any pair of Deltas above (Float)
Q8.
C
UMULATIVE
P
ROBABILITY
L
EVELS
(CPL)
CPL defines a level for a measurement where a specified percentage of the samples fall at or below the indicated percentage. The following table shows how to construct the 8 field names for the each of the four measurements, dBA, dBC, dBC_dBA, NCMax, RC and SIL:
Prefix
L_99_
L_95_
L_90_
L_80_
L_50_
L_33_
L_10_
L_05_
Suffixes dBA dBA dBA dBA dBA dBA dBA dBA dBC dBC dBC dBC dBC dBC dBC dBC dBC_dBA dBC_dBA dBC_dBA dBC_dBA dBC_dBA dBC_dBA dBC_dBA dBC_dBA
dBA is raw SPL_A data taken form the samples (Float)
NCMax
NCMax
NCMax
NCMax
NCMax
NCMax
NCMax
NCMax
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
dBA is raw SPL_C data taken form the samples (Float)
dBA_dBA is raw SPL_C minus the raw SLP_A data taken form the samples (Float)
SIL
SIL
SIL
SIL
SIL
SIL
SIL
SIL
NCMax is the calculated sound level from the NC sections above (Float)
RC is the value stored in the RC sections above (Float)
SIL is the value stored in the NCB sections above (Float)
NCEMBT-080201 345
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Factor
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Q9.
C
OVARIANCE
I
N
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
U
SING
A
NALYSIS
O
F
C
OVARIANCE
(A
NCOVA
)
Table Q1. Variance in sound interference level (SIL) measurements.
Sound Measure
L_95_SIL
Percentage
10%
L_95_SIL
L_95_SIL
L_95_SIL
L_90_SIL
L_90_SIL
L_90_SIL
L_90_SIL
79%
10%
0%
15%
71%
15%
0%
L_80_SIL
L_80_SIL
L_80_SIL
L_80_SIL
L_50_SIL
L_50_SIL
L_50_SIL
L_50_SIL
L_10_SIL
L_10_SIL
L_10_SIL
L_10_SIL
16%
67%
16%
0%
19%
62%
19%
0%
27%
46%
27%
0%
346 NCEMBT-080201
Factor
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q2. Variance in sound dBA measurements.
Sound Measure
L_99_dBA
L_99_dBA
L_99_dBA
L_99_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_90_dBA
L_90_dBA
L_90_dBA
L_90_dBA
L_80_dBA
L_80_dBA
L_80_dBA
L_80_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_10_dBA
L_10_dBA
L_10_dBA
L_10_dBA
17%
66%
17%
0%
22%
56%
22%
0%
31%
37%
31%
0%
11%
79%
11%
0%
14%
72%
14%
0%
Percentage
11%
78%
11%
0%
NCEMBT-080201 347
Factor
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
Building
Zone
Sampling Date
Residual
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q3. Variance in sound NC max and RC measurements.
Sound Measure Percentage
L_90_NCMax 11%
L_90_NCMax
L_90_NCMax
L_90_NCMax
L_80_NCMax
77%
11%
0%
14%
L_80_NCMax
L_80_NCMax
L_80_NCMax
L_50_NCMax
72%
14%
0%
17%
L_80_RC
L_80_RC
L_50_RC
L_50_RC
L_50_RC
L_50_RC
L_10_RC
L_10_RC
L_10_RC
L_10_RC
L_50_NCMax
L_50_NCMax
L_50_NCMax
L_10_NCMax
L_10_NCMax
L_10_NCMax
L_10_NCMax
L_90_RC
L_90_RC
L_90_RC
L_90_RC
L_80_RC
L_80_RC
19%
0%
28%
44%
28%
0%
15%
0%
19%
62%
0%
14%
73%
13%
0%
15%
69%
66%
17%
0%
29%
42%
29%
348 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q10.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
W
ITH
A
NSWERS
T
O
T HE O CCUPANT P ERCEPTION Q UESTIONNAIRE F OR T HE Q UESTION “O VER T HE L AST F OUR
W EEKS I W OULD R ATE T HE S OUND O R N OISE I N M Y W ORK A REA A S A CCEPTABLE ”
(Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]).
Table Q4. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 1.
Variable
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBA
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr
0.639205
0.619471 p value
0.087935
0.101431
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.128336
0.114708
0.746249
0.210132
0.761998
0.786802
0.033468
0.418226
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.105442
-0.25811
0.062286
0.361358
0.109636
-0.25811
0.803756
0.537104
0.883515
0.379126
0.796075
0.537104
Table Q5. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 2.
Variable Type Corr p value
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.39671
-0.5631
-0.10623
-0.31739
0.378247
0.188095
0.820675
0.487912
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.34165
-0.5631
-0.04385
0.133097
-0.41458
-0.15357
0.120842
0.133097
0.453239
0.188095
0.925625
0.776043
0.355073
0.742349
0.796347
0.776043
NCEMBT-080201 349
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q6 Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 3.
Variable Type Corr p value
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
L_50_dBA
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.69816
-0.74245
-0.41509
-0.22321
-0.73015
0.005488
0.002356
0.13997
0.443039
0.003026
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.75287
-0.39065
-0.22321
-0.73632
-0.73017
-0.34187
-0.21213
0.001885
0.167271
0.443039
0.002673
0.003025
0.231548
0.466578
Table Q7. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 4.
Variable
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBA
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr
0
0.067598 p value
1
0.796577
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.18531
0.043972
0.210132
0.243486
0.476429
0.866921
0.418226
0.346332
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.247365
0.049222
0.079523
-0.04397
0.204531
0.040034
0.338458
0.851188
0.761593
0.866921
0.431019
0.878752
Table Q8. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.14587
-0.00837
0.016599
-0.00328
0.528104
0.971274
0.943068
0.988757
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.10733
0.038214
0.023185
-0.01492
0
0.059322
0.023769
-0.02366
0.643321
0.869374
0.920538
0.948815
1
0.798394
0.918543
0.91893
350 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q9. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 6.
Variable
L_5_dBA
Type
Pearson
Corr
0.219742 p value
0.142282
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
L_50_dBA
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.133436
0.238694
0.279094
0.163888
0.376663
0.110147
0.060337
0.276449
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.097841
0.23607
0.279094
0.097429
0.146653
0.226883
0.213297
0.517709
0.114231
0.060337
0.519480
0.330777
0.129444
0.154656
Table Q10 Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 7.
Variable
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBA
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr
0.046887
0.071886 p value
0.644906
0.479512
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.010774
-0.10362
0.17181
0.153721
0.915707
0.307436
0.089047
0.128731
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.0343
-0.13694
0.124047
0.204069
0.025119
0.054596
0.736088
0.176491
0.221213
0.04276
0.805063
0.591458
Table Q11. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.06888
0.010233
0.222894
0.23667
0.668707
0.949371
0.161281
0.136272
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.00492
-0.01993
0.221158
0.23667
-0.11601
-0.09162
-0.05285
-0.02029
0.975651
0.901584
0.164655
0.136272
0.470092
0.56889
0.742799
0.899819
NCEMBT-080201 351
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q12. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 9.
Variable
L_5_dBA
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.0447 p value
0.736734
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBC
L_5_dBC
L_50_dBA
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.07874
0.15512
0.16788
0.06712
0.553344
0.240743
0.203739
0.613506
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBC
L_95_dBC
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.16788
0.09462
0.07874
0.23425
0.24865
0.17201
-0.103
0.203739
0.475939
0.553344
0.074134
0.057561
0.192679
0.437593
Table Q13. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “over the last four weeks i would rate the sound or noise in my work area as acceptable” for building 10.
Variable
L_5_dBA
Type
Pearson
Corr
0.147992 p value
0.205115
L_5_dBA
L_5_dBC
Spearman
Pearson
0.145156
0.125206
0.214029
0.284475
L_5_dBC
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_50_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_95_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_95 _dBC
L_95 _dBC
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.145156
0.131565
0.157931
0.121706
0.145156
0.004386
0.00162
0.122608
0.139107
0.214029
0.260526
0.175973
0.298259
0.214029
0.970206
0.988996
0.294665
0.233942
352 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q11.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
I
N
W
ITH
A
NSWERS
T O T HE O CCUPANT P ERCEPTION Q UESTIONNAIRE F OR T HE Q UESTION “T HROUGHOUT T HE
C OURSE O F T HE E NTIRE W ORKDAY , T HE S OUNDS O R N OISE I N M Y W ORK A REA F LUCTUATES ”
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Bldg ID
1
1
3
3
2
2
9
9
8
8
10
10
(Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]).
Table Q14. Pearson and Spearman Tests Results for Individual Buildings
Type Corr
Pearson
Spearman
0.285779
0.258113
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.292009
0.048086
-0.16162
0.039647
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.553256
0.525468
-0.14598
-0.16042
0.111175
0.105222
0.013732
0.069466
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.07197
0.016214
0.039309
0.045759
0.130723
0.13318 p value
0.492624
0.537104
0.525133
0.918461
0.580941
0.892955
0.021237
0.030296
0.52779
0.487267
0.462
0.486463
0.89269
0.494466
0.65478
0.919855
0.767543
0.73074
0.263615
0.254668
NCEMBT-080201 353
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q12.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
W
ITH
A
NSWERS
T
O
T HE O CCUPANT P ERCEPTION Q UESTIONNAIRE F OR T HE Q UESTION “I H EAR S OUNDS F ROM
O UTSIDE T HE B UILDING (A IRPLANES , T RAFFIC , T RAINS , C ONSTRUCTION , M ECHANICAL
E QUIPMENT , S IRENS , E TC .) I N M Y W ORK A REA ”
(SndOSHear) with follow on questions concerning the sound affecting productivity (SndOSProdAffect), if the sound was annoying/distracting (SndOSAnnoy), and how soon the annoyance/distraction occurred
(SndOSDistrWithin) and for how long (SndOSDistrFor) the annoyance/distraction continued
(Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]).
Table Q15. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 1.
Variable
SndOSHear
SndOSHear
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr
-0.35642
-0.45004 p value
0.386147
0.263195
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.24961
-0.2905
-0.22601
0.551056
0.485186
0.590436
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.063786
0.118435
0.131165
0.16912
0.290323
0.880724
0.823178
0.804381
0.748738
0.576751
Table Q16. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 2.
Variable
SndOSHear
SndOSHear
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr
0.246018
0.285727 p value
0.594871
0.53449
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.928593
0.783349
0.894459
0.007466
0.065322
0.016120
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.783349
-1
-1
-1
-1
0.065322
354 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q17. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 3.
Variable
SndOSHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.18333 p value
0.530418
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.75000
0.148109
-0.04444
0.239423
0.002006
0.683025
0.90297
0.505266
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.026836
-0.30877
-0.65727
-0.21093
-0.42426
0.941339
0.551565
0.156069
0.688298
0.401788
Table Q18. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building g 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndOSHear
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.056954
0.124274
0.151389
0.266391
0.828117
0.634634
0.605417
0.357257
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.111374
0.198380
0.204424
0.153624
0.252947
0.310517
0.704649
0.496586
0.571046
0.671766
0.480742
0.382536
Table Q19. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndOSHear
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.18592
0.21749
0.19768
0.24749
0.419738
0.343618
0.431709
0.322104
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.3944
-0.3962
0.20705
0.09805
0.15573
0.09415
0.105319
0.103589
0.441644
0.717914
0.564671
0.728711
NCEMBT-080201 355
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q20. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 6.
Variable
SndOSHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.11632 p value
0.441416
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.19947
-0.21812
-0.25174
-0.11479
0.183840
0.264821
0.196268
0.560804
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.039172
-0.39221
-0.28968
-0.43312
-0.39974
0.843120
0.119449
0.259398
0.082443
0.111895
Table Q21 Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndOSHear
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.235489
0.144126
0.057356
0.044391
0.018954
0.154660
0.613314
0.695805
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.06697
-0.06507
-0.15470
-0.08227
-0.08671
-0.07440
0.555058
0.566329
0.246263
0.539262
0.517497
0.578881
Table Q22. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndOSHear
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.32372
-0.42313
-0.22930
-0.18998
0.038954
0.005845
0.317387
0.409465
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.05114
-0.07136
-0.11809
-0.02937
0.081203
0.134923
0.825764
0.758568
0.700799
0.924111
0.792000
0.660319
356 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q23. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 9.
Variable
SndOSHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.43795 p value
0.000523
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.29396
0.090919
0.216704
-0.15491
0.023833
0.557239
0.157678
0.315369
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.05635
-0.03095
0.090978
-0.05348
0.052284
0.716351
0.862068
0.608854
0.763874
0.769017
Table Q24. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “i hear sounds from outside the building (airplanes, traffic, trains, construction, mechanical equipment, sirens, etc.) in my work area” for building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndOSHear
SndOSHear
SndOSAnnoy
SndOSAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.11841
-0.11690
-0.00589
0.075250
0.311622
0.317899
0.974896
0.687442
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSProdAffect
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrWithin
SndOSDistrFor
SndOSDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.25493
-0.22206
0.326046
0.287187
0.197818
0.241364
0.166344
0.229896
0.119978
0.173613
0.354147
0.255868
NCEMBT-080201 357
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Bldg ID
1
1
2
5
6
4
5
3
4
2
3
8
9
9
10
7
8
6
7
10
Q13.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
C
AUSE
O F T HE S OUND D ISTRACTION
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q25. Results for “too loud” and L_99 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.161394
0.454699
0.567634
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.524554 n/a n/a
0.513297
0.507651
0.104163
0.099449
-0.18179
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.19589
-0.16368
-0.18448
0.142476
0.165128
-0.13568
-0.04655
-0.05682
-0.05186 p value
0.702600
0.257663
0.183780
0.226767 n/a n/a
0.035091
0.037502
0.653192
0.668001
0.226610
0.192001
0.105484
0.067561
0.374204
0.302195
0.305546
0.726243
0.628261
0.658582
358 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Bldg ID
1
1
3
3
2
2
9
9
8
8
10
10
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
Bldg ID
2
2
1
1
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Table Q26. Results for “intermittent/unpredictable” and L_95 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr p value
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.093056
0.255146 n/a n/a
0.826524
0.541958 n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.094299
-0.01972
-0.23703
-0.17186
-0.19470
-0.13229
0.050315
-0.05076
0.748473
0.946651
0.359665
0.509531
0.397699
0.567580
0.739833
0.737611
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.185226
0.188806
0.087062
0.071611
-0.12925
-0.16443
0.003346
-0.00577
0.066434
0.061261
0.588328
0.656374
0.329233
0.213334
0.977269
0.960797
Table Q27. Results for “increases /decreases” and L_80 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr p value
Pearson
Spearman
-0.51396
-0.59534
0.192587
0.119450
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
-0.09045
0.11007 n/a n/a
0.758460
0.707967
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.18729
-0.17186
-0.20949
-0.28347
-0.04449
-0.06967
0.054143
0.061433
0.471648
0.509531
0.362086
0.213047
0.769054
0.645469
0.594543
0.545803
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.128014
0.021257
0.246875
0.184888
0.022717
0
0.425084
0.895049
0.059430
0.160950
0.846604
1
NCEMBT-080201 359
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Bldg ID
1
2
3
1
2
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q28. Results for “understandable” and L_90 minus L_50.
Type Corr
Pearson 0.159698
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.255146
-0.12982
0.104911 n/a
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a
0.438376
0.366072
-0.20167
-0.28347 n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.04382
0
0.020789
0.103575
-0.13517
0.048476
0.182197
0.173174 p value
0.705618
0.541958
0.781459
0.822876 n/a n/a
0.078382
0.148425
0.380692
0.213047 n/a n/a
0.666739
1
0.897347
0.519297
0.307393
0.715412
0.117702
0.137334
360 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q14.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
W
ITH
A
NSWERS
T
O
T HE O CCUPANT P ERCEPTION Q UESTIONNAIRE F OR T HE Q UESTION “I H EAR S OUNDS F ROM
T ELEPHONE /S PEAKER P HONE C ONVERSATIONS T HAT C ARRY I NTO M Y W ORK A REA ”
(SndTelHear) with follow on questions concerning the sound affecting productivity (SndTelProdAffect), if the sound was annoying/distracting (SndTelAnnoy), and how soon the annoyance/distraction occurred
(SndTelDistrWithin) and for how long (SndTelDistrFor) the annoyance/distraction continued
(Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]).
Table Q29. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 1
Variable
SndTelHear
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
0.504866
0.28026
-0.04618 p value
0.201933
0.501380
0.913532
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.269321
0.269851
0.594937
-0.13751
0.038837
0.117797
0.283069
0.518911
0.518056
0.119766
0.768763
0.934118
0.801406
0.538466
Table Q30. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 2.
Variable
SndTelHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.11263 p value
0.810012
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
0.130847
0.354265
0.779764
0.490833
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.223906
0.518566
0.318182
-0.42187
-0.38889
-0.90999
-0.83333
0.669754
0.291875
0.538834
0.578133
0.611111
0.090014
0.166667
NCEMBT-080201 361
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q31. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 3.
Variable
SndTelHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.33665 p value
0.239214
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelAnnoy
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.47739
-0.07000
0.292877
-0.32913
0.084299
0.837950
0.382102
0.322999
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.142899
0.171002
0.287914
-0.06536
0.393422
0.675106
0.615160
0.390590
0.848573
0.231280
Table Q32. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndTelHear
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.14054
-0.13493
-0.05024
-0.03924
0.105124
0.590564
0.605637
0.858869
0.889585
0.709255
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.155894
0.144614
0.080294
0.059849
0.090763
0.579028
0.671395
0.814458
0.861241
0.790702
Table Q33. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndTelHear
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.125565
0.147542
-0.24431
-0.31176
0.587590
0.523324
0.328557
0.207890
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.00968
-0.05803
-0.16302
-0.24189
-0.43168
-0.53409
0.969579
0.819100
0.561574
0.385090
0.108112
0.040283
362 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q34. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 6.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndTelHear
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.142766
-0.05154
-0.27303
-0.30689
-0.18042
0.343893
0.733709
0.072946
0.042741
0.241200
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.29614
-0.00987
-0.04139
-0.17377
-0.27432
0.050960
0.951810
0.799820
0.283573
0.086719
Table Q35. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndTelHear
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.009336
-0.06584
0.110619
0.106004
0.926928
0.517317
0.288508
0.309218
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.032546
0.012143
-0.16363
-0.21844
0.07414
-0.04161
0.755490
0.907529
0.141868
0.048659
0.507989
0.710504
Table Q36. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndTelHear
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.12239
-0.17783
0.065884
0.092829
0.445859
0.265995
0.686278
0.568871
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.092426
0.035771
0.290261
0.244447
0.214489
0.195136
0.570557
0.826545
0.095861
0.163534
0.223173
0.268752
NCEMBT-080201 363
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q37. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 9.
Variable
SndTelHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
0.23115 p value
0.078163
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelAnnoy
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.274131
-0.02712
0.040738
0.092431
0.035639
0.841276
0.763511
0.494072
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.182455
-0.14944
-0.02192
0.053858
0.079816
0.174331
0.295253
0.878663
0.707395
0.577690
Table Q38 Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements with answers to the occupant perception questionnaire for the question “I hear sounds from telephone/speaker phone conversations that carry into my work area” for building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndTelHear
SndTelHear
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelProdAffect
SndTelAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.00929
0.019067
-0.04518
-0.06842
0.007169
0.936947
0.871020
0.712423
0.576444
0.953377
SndTelAnnoy
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrFor
SndTelDistrWithin
SndTelDistrWithin
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.03102
0.159326
0.102253
-0.02426
-0.02077
0.800245
0.212297
0.425192
0.850299
0.871645
364 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q15.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
C
AUSE
O F T HE T ELEPHONE /S PEAKERPHONE D ISTRACTION
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
7
8
6
7
5
6
4
5
Bldg ID
1
1
2
3
4
2
3
8
9
9
10
10
Table Q39. Results for “too loud” and L_99 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
-0.16589
-0.12991
0.392977
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.487582
-0.03834
0.11007
0.000425
0
0.274622
0.314922
0.175178
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.212295
-0.0387
-0.02009
0.143053
0.034335
-0.02796
0
-0.09472
-0.08672 p value
0.694610
0.759138
0.383159
0.267032
0.896478
0.707967
0.998708
1
0.228300
0.164388
0.244242
0.156649
0.703720
0.843498
0.372252
0.831239
0.833491
1
0.418889
0.459436
NCEMBT-080201 365
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
Bldg ID
2
2
1
1
9
9
10
8
8
7
7
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q40. Results for “intermittent/unpredictable” and L_95 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr p value
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.07218
0.207255
0.022541
0.104592 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.806283
0.477113
0.931571
0.689528
10
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.167554
0.150812
0.013898
-0.04061
-0.04331
0.013872
-0.01043
0.016361
0.003222
-0.0168
-0.0388
-0.04149
0.467858
0.514054
0.926959
0.788736
0.670348
0.891601
0.948375
0.919133
0.980679
0.899501
0.741042
0.723780
366 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Bldg ID
1
1
3
3
2
2
9
9
8
8
10
10
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
Bldg ID
2
2
1
1
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Table Q41. Results for “increases /decreases” and L_80 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr p value
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.1499
-0.47697
-0.11536
-0.10459 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.609013
0.084614
0.659303
0.689528
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.213112
0.188982
0.041985
-0.08594
0.094176
0.082213
-0.04749
-0.04467
0.07708
0.11408
0.075713
0.058219
0.353657
0.411972
0.781747
0.570093
0.353822
0.418523
0.768108
0.781537
0.561741
0.389608
0.518532
0.619795
Table Q42. Results for “understandable” and L_90 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr
Pearson
Spearman
0.386271
0.232397
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.60434
-0.81264
0.060453
-0.15776
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.21728
0.324067
-0.27345
-0.42021
-0.1564
-0.10272
-0.0298
-0.05484
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.12862
-0.07862
0.103821
0.110256
0.116112
0.121339 p value
0.344560
0.579690
0.150628
0.026310
0.837344
0.590129
0.402196
0.204452
0.230367
0.057880
0.299298
0.496928
0.769672
0.589771
0.422862
0.625137
0.433908
0.405799
0.321183
0.299728
NCEMBT-080201 367
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q16.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
Q UESTION “I H EAR S OUNDS F ROM C ONVERSATIONS T HAT C ARRY I NTO M Y W ORK A REA ”
… (SndConvHear) with follow on questions concerning the sound affecting productivity
(SndConvProdAffect), if the sound was annoying/distracting (SndConvAnnoy), and how soon the annoyance/distraction occurred (SndConvDistrWithin) and for how long (SndConvDistrFor) the annoyance/distraction continued
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q43. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 1.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.528707
0.797468
0.511067
0.177920
0.017742
0.241103
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.695522
-0.05403
0.258075
-0.30852
-0.43771
-0.20959
-0.18759
0.082711
0.908411
0.576321
0.551906
0.385361
0.690214
0.721913
Table Q44. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 2.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.065534
0.112621
0.212581
0.888985
0.810019
0.647210
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.00943
0.067524
0
0.105384
0.25
-0.14612
-0.15811
0.983985
0.885629
1
0.866069
0.685038
0.814621
0.799525
368 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q45. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 3.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.73872
-0.42297
-0.17281
0.321052
-0.13454
0.002545
0.131851
0.572357
0.284810
0.661241
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.228927
-0.21381
0.103679
-0.37508
0.278549
0.451861
0.483041
0.736069
0.206643
0.356761
Table Q46. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.07881
-0.06263
0.078312
0.094747
0.763681
0.811270
0.781462
0.736965
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.150273
0.06055
0.20166
0.125251
0.574285
0.609904
0.592950
0.830266
0.508822
0.683487
0.040108
0.026873
Table Q47. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 5.
Variable
SndConvHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
0.360662 p value
0.108240
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.362826
0.162805
0.084865
0.105985
0.480744
0.714552
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.01204
-0.15954
0.039099
-0.03659
-0.40555
-0.3759
0.958700
0.489694
0.881566
0.889116
0.106298
0.137011
NCEMBT-080201 369
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q48. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 6.
Variable
SndConvHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
0.186093 p value
0.215620
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.005305
-0.11379
-0.24872
-0.1554
0.972087
0.451478
0.095559
0.302416
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.24088
-0.03794
-0.0524
-0.30492
-0.34426
0.106824
0.818635
0.751399
0.059091
0.031870
Table Q49. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.044515
-0.03553
0.090461
0.052212
0.140882
0.661743
0.726973
0.378209
0.611514
0.168695
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.149952
-0.11809
0.011238
0.106259
0.055050
0.142644
0.303142
0.922208
0.354485
0.632150
Table Q50. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.015406
0.032749
0.03781
0.091192
0.923839
0.838929
0.814440
0.570688
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.0034
0.067967
0.187482
0.198669
0.132086
0.09315
0.983186
0.672858
0.304181
0.275695
0.471139
0.612001
370 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q51. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 9.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.391823
0.451778
0.124438
0.172839
0.027626
0.002148
0.000328
0.352014
0.194481
0.836909
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.028961
-0.19011
-0.09836
0.089918
0.147478
0.829139
0.190741
0.501335
0.538936
0.311902
Table Q52. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the question “i hear sounds from conversations that carry into my work area” for building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndConvHear
SndConvHear
SndConvAnnoy
SndConvAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.037604
0.005957
0.051526
0.031714
0.748738
0.959546
0.660640
0.787076
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvProdAffect
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrWithin
SndConvDistrFor
SndConvDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.01275
0.009255
-0.05864
-0.06170
0.019782
0.033577
0.913572
0.937184
0.637360
0.619906
0.873754
0.787356
NCEMBT-080201 371
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q17.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
C
AUSE
O F C ONVERSATION D ISTRACTION
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
7
8
5
7
5
5
4
5
Bldg ID
1
1
2
3
4
2
3
8
9
9
10
10
Table Q53. Results for “too loud” and L_99 minus L_50 for SIL.
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
-0.03677
0.389742
0.392977
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.487582
-0.10853
0.092113
0.338169
0.270056
0.228588
0.386795
0.000354
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.00342
-0.04809
-0.07968
-0.04887
-0.02573
-0.08312
-0.07501
-0.09829
-0.07247
P value
0.931127
0.339863
0.383159
0.267032
0.711905
0.754137
0.184304
0.294503
0.318931
0.083249
0.998138
0.981982
0.636416
0.433054
0.761557
0.873114
0.531378
0.572308
0.401472
0.536635
372 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
7
8
6
7
5
6
4
5
Bldg ID
1
1
2
3
4
2
3
8
9
9
10
10
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Bldg ID
1
1
3
3
2
2
9
9
8
8
10
10
Table Q54. Results for “intermittent/unpredictable” and L_95 minus L_50 for SIL
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr n/a n/a p value
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
-0.03834
0.11007
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.22163
-0.17753 n/a n/a
-0.07397
-0.12292
0.076736
0.110845
-0.02395
0.028718
0.062121
0.048476
-0.04325
-0.05469 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.896478
0.707967
0.392611
0.495454 n/a n/a
0.625182
0.415750
0.450293
0.274719
0.881852
0.858539
0.640209
0.715412
0.712555
0.641183
Table Q55. Results for “increases /decreases” and L_95 minus L_50 for SIL.
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr n/a n/a
0.566149 p value n/a n/a
0.185189
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.524554
-0.08660
0.146760 n/a n/a
-0.07466
0.056695 n/a
0.226767
0.768474
0.616615 n/a n/a
0.747729
0.807158 n/a
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a
-0.02512
0.095572
-0.06291
-0.10674
-0.07319
-0.03005
0.013945
-0.00479 n/a
0.805044
0.346699
0.695959
0.506532
0.581701
0.821268
0.905481
0.967491
NCEMBT-080201 373
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Bldg ID
1
2
3
1
2
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q56. Results for “understandable” and L_95 minus L_50 for SIL.
Type Corr
Pearson 0.379225
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.168763
-0.60434
-0.81264
0
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.037796
-0.41578
-0.40508
-0.04717
-0.21733
-0.14229
-0.24097
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.00327
-0.00417
-0.02082
-0.04492
0.085347
0.134542
0.121672
0.110687 p value
0.354183
0.689526
0.150628
0.026310
1
0.897927
0.096936
0.106741
0.839102
0.343984
0.345511
0.106694
0.974399
0.967321
0.897194
0.780323
0.520410
0.309653
0.298396
0.344460
374 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q18.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
Q UESTION “I H EAR S OUNDS F ROM P IPED I N M USIC O R M ASKING S OUNDS I N M Y W ORK
A REA ”
… (SndTelHear) with follow on questions concerning the sound affecting productivity
(SndMusProdAffect), if the sound was annoying/distracting (SndMusAnnoy), and how soon the annoyance/distraction occurred (SndMusDistrWithin) and for how long (SndMusDistrFor) the annoyance/distraction continued
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question; nd = not done).
Table Q57. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area” For Building 1.
Variable
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
0
0
1 p value
1
1
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
1 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Nd
Nd n/a n/a n/a n/a nd nd
Table Q58. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area” for Building 2.
Variable
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr n/a n/a n/a p value n/a n/a n/a
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Nd
Nd n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nd nd
NCEMBT-080201 375
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q59. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”for Building 3.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusDistrWithin
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.0456
0.329412 n/a n/a n/a
0.876975
0.250104 n/a n/a n/a
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a nd nd n/a n/a n/a nd nd
Table Q60. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”for Building 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.002593
0.056814
-0.12249
-0.18759
0.992120
0.828534
0.817184
0.721913
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.88081
-0.86603
-0.88081
-0.86603
Nd
Nd
0.313994
0.333333
0.313994
0.333333 nd nd
Table Q61. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”for Building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a nd nd n/a n/a n/a n/a nd nd
376 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q62. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”for Building 6.
Variable
SndMusHear
Type
Pears
Corr
-0.20152 p value
0.179281
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusDistrWithin
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pears
-0.12022
0.330349
0.347612
-0.12770
0.426121
0.123672
0.104105
0.663522
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pearson
Spearman
-0.28369
0.304638
0.221578 nd nd
0.325650
0.289592
0.446470 nd nd
Table Q63. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”for Building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusDistrWithin
Pears
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pears
-0.00895
0.036246
-0.04915
-0.07916
-0.35433
0.929968
0.721708
0.807666
0.694700
0.178136
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pearson
Spearman
-0.33488
-0.07315
-0.02356 nd nd
0.204843
0.787744
0.930974 nd nd
Table Q64. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”for Building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
Pears
Spear
Pears
Spear
-0.26169
0.046734
-0.50385
-0.38464
0.098385
0.771702
0.248942
0.394229
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Pears
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pearson
Spearman
-0.23533
0.098374
-0.67438
-0.76667 nd nd
0.653525
0.852915
0.141783
0.075315 nd nd
NCEMBT-080201 377
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q65. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”for Building 9.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusDistrWithin
Pears
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pears
0.011108
-0.08568
0.365502
0.274030
0.048341
0.933453
0.518756
0.015945
0.075372
0.826622
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pearson
Spearman
0.150775
0.186063
-0.00295 nd nd
0.492267
0.395312
0.989358 nd nd
Table Q66. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or
Masking Sounds In My Work Area”of Building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMusHear
SndMusHear
SndMusAnnoy
SndMusAnnoy
Pears
Spear
Pears
Spear
-0.04476
-0.10085
-0.09413
-0.2514
0.702948
0.389269
0.771059
0.430578
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrWithin
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusDistrFor
SndMusProdAffect
SndMusProdAffect
Pears
Spear
Pears
Spear
Pearson
Spearman
-0.07266
0.123349
0.266205
0.203548 nd nd
0.852634
0.751879
0.488704
0.599387 nd nd
378 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q19.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
C
AUSE
O F T HE P IPED I N M USIC O R M ASKING S OUND D ISTRACTION
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
7
8
6
7
5
6
4
5
Bldg ID
1
1
2
3
4
2
3
8
9
9
10
10
Table Q67. Results for “too loud” and L_80 minus L_10 for dBA.
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
0.20589
0.425243 n/a
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson n/a
-0.14297
-0.21138 n/a n/a n/a n/a
-0.11451
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.07248
0.059203
0.055082
-0.25326
-0.27691
-0.18299
-0.16802
-0.26330
-0.29637 p value
0.624727
0.293576 n/a n/a
0.625850
0.468190 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.448592
0.632161
0.560506
0.588154
0.110113
0.079655
0.165362
0.203363
0.022468
0.009828
NCEMBT-080201 379
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
Bldg ID
2
2
1
1
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q68. Results for “intermittent/unpredictable” and L_80 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr p value
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
-0.18729
-0.17186 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.471648
0.509531
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
0.241657
0.257399
0.035503
-0.02795
0.250788
0.191316
-0.08242
0.060096
0.212712
0.186671 n/a n/a
0.105669
0.084176
0.727185
0.783591
0.113750
0.230823
0.534854
0.651171
0.066917
0.108804
380 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Bldg ID
1
1
3
3
2
2
9
9
8
8
10
10
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
Bldg ID
2
2
1
1
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Table Q69. Results for “increases /decreases” and L_80 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr p value
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.14321
-0.29352 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.625257
0.308431 n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
-0.06363
-0.09964 n/a n/a n/a n/a
-0.13003
-0.12907
0.084206
0.09813 n/a n/a
0.674382
0.510008 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.326322
0.329914
0.472588
0.402264
Table Q70. Results for “understandable” and L_80 minus L_50 for dBA.
Type Corr
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
-0.08346
-0.11337
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
0.042014
0.11408 n/a n/a p value n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.411485
0.263846 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.752041
0.389608 n/a n/a
NCEMBT-080201 381
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q20.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
Q UESTION “I H EAR S OUNDS F ROM O FFICE E QUIPMENT I N M Y W ORK A REA ”
… (SndEquipHear) with follow on questions concerning the sound affecting productivity
(SndEquipProdAffect), if the sound was annoying/distracting (SndEquipAnnoy), and how soon the annoyance/distraction occurred (SndEquipDistrWithin) and for how long (SndEquipDistrFor) the annoyance/distraction continued
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q71. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 1.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.697724
0.718185
0.564618
0.054341
0.044794
0.243072
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.338823
0.660195
0.562775
0.504524
0.516185
0.303130
0.176777
0.511215
0.153583
0.244957
0.386021
0.373253
0.620038
0.776099
Table Q72. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 2.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.063329
0.047170
0.808056
0.892705
0.920011
0.097989
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.789474
0.640070
0.459627
-0.20217
0.055556
-0.52476
-0.50000
0.112222
0.244736
0.436097
0.797828
0.944444
0.475244
0.500000
382 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q73. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 3.
Variable
SndEquipHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
0.204327 p value
0.483496
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.390439
0.224054
0.328165
0.224054
0.167521
0.629109
0.472397
0.629109
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.328165
1
1
1
1
0.472397
Table Q74. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.31413
-0.41625
0.253617
0.435692
0.233583
0.219482
0.096523
0.451749
0.180413
0.489398
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.381025
0.019229
-0.19627
0.387455
0.257248
0.247625
0.967361
0.673182
0.390476
0.577588
Table Q75. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.2985
-0.2718
-0.1179
-0.2191
0.188643
0.233271
0.701156
0.471972
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.0385
-0.2263
-0.0743
-0.2504
-0.3408
-0.5114
0.900439
0.457167
0.874064
0.58797
0.454397
0.240726
NCEMBT-080201 383
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q76. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 6.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.223015
0.191777
0.08895
0.033772
0.056824
0.136286
0.201677
0.672425
0.872674
0.787321
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.036457
-0.20984
-0.03451
-0.09544
-0.09737
0.862644
0.491399
0.910874
0.756444
0.751654
Table Q77. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.04650
-0.10667
0.063454
-0.00840
0.647624
0.293318
0.576040
0.941081
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.163912
0.103795
0.002998
0.154672
0.210824
0.137020
0.146265
0.359542
0.985748
0.353819
0.203897
0.412039
Table Q78. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.063316
0.064022
-0.10959
-0.16401
0.694115
0.690874
0.518485
0.332070
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.15766
-0.15302
0.050126
0.147844
0.277662
0.288675
0.351367
0.365895
0.883637
0.664423
0.408421
0.389283
384 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q79. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 9.
Variable
SndEquipHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
0.158144 p value
0.231587
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.07119
-0.25183
-0.21133
-0.08625
0.592094
0.224601
0.310546
0.681843
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.033996
0.236395
0.137079
0.1048
0.136522
0.87184
0.378066
0.61269
0.699303
0.614148
Table Q80. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment
In My Work Area” for Building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndEquipHear
SndEquipHear
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipAnnoy
SndEquipProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.382131
0.417021
-0.04031
-0.18475
-0.01994
0.000717
0.000198
0.802425
0.247535
0.901508
SndEquipProdAffect
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrWithi
SndEquipDistrFor
SndEquipDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.07838
-0.13195
-0.11602
0.085692
0.096381
0.626183
0.601729
0.646637
0.735302
0.703619
NCEMBT-080201 385
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q21.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
C
AUSE
O F T HE O FFICE E QUIPMENT S OUND D ISTRACTION
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q81. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the cause of the office equipment sound distraction for
“too loud” and L_90 minus L_10 for NC.
Bldg ID
1
1
2
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
0.711935
0.755291
0.107818
P value
0.047593
0.030204
0.818024
5
6
4
5
3
4
2
3
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.104911
0.146143
0.18345
0.166617
0.080695
0.119589
0.092009
-0.27592
0.822876
0.618112
0.530152
0.522729
0.758180
0.605625
0.691617
0.063444
8
9
9
10
7
8
6
7
10
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.33963
0.048776
-0.03688
0.154862
0.153693
-0.17748
-0.12091
0.074811
0.148885
0.020933
0.631630
0.717077
0.333651
0.337359
0.178687
0.361656
0.523540
0.202363
386 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q82. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the cause of the office equipment sound distraction for
“intermittent/unpredictable” and L_90 minus L_50 for NC.
Bldg ID Type Corr p value
2
2
1
1
3
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.413375
0.433555
0.946149
0.812636 n/a
0.308691
0.283209
0.001255
0.026310 n/a
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a
-0.03507
0.152767
0.101180
0.013710
0.329355
0.327780 n/a
0.893700
0.558313
0.662548
0.952965
0.025412
0.026164
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.068126
0.091684
-0.15912
-0.16872
-0.04420
-0.10392
0.046692
0.054693
0.502849
0.366758
0.320358
0.291658
0.739605
0.433449
0.690788
0.641183
Table Q83. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the cause of the office equipment sound distraction for
“increases /decreases” and L_80 minus L_50 for NC.
Bldg ID
1
1
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr n/a n/a p value n/a n/a
3
3
2
2
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.218444
0.229186
0.027566
0.095572 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.144713
0.125496
0.786509
0.346699
9
9
8
8
10
10
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.16055
-0.15191
0.059652
0.068674 n/a n/a
0.315981
0.343061
0.653583
0.605283 n/a n/a
NCEMBT-080201 387
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q84. Statistical results in comparison of sound measurements and the cause of the office equipment sound distraction for
“understandable” and L_80 minus L_50 for NC.
Bldg ID Type Corr p value
2
2
1
1
3
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson n/a n/a
-0.58278
-0.52455 n/a n/a n/a
0.169709
0.226767 n/a
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a
-0.33020
-0.33992
-0.12972
-0.09449
-0.08733
-0.06876 n/a
0.195516
0.181891
0.575181
0.683706
0.563866
0.649809
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.108630
0.106225 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.284486
0.295347 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
388 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q22.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS
I
N
C
OMPARISON
O
F
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS
A
ND
T
HE
Q UESTION “I H EAR S OUNDS F ROM B UILDING M ECHANICAL E QUIPMENT I N M Y W ORK A REA ”
… (SndMechHear) with follow on questions concerning the sound affecting productivity
(SndMechProdAffect), if the sound was annoying/distracting (SndMEchAnnoy), and how soon the annoyance/distraction occurred (SndMechDistrWithin) and for how long (SndMechDistrFor) the annoyance/distraction continued
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q85. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 1.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMechHear
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.39044
-0.23703
0.403542
0.750366
0.338918
0.571940
0.427545
0.085697
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.109134
0.417786
-0.27735
0
-0.69338
-0.86603
0.836948
0.409782
0.821088
1
0.512246
0.333333
Table Q86. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 2.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMechHear
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.645764
0.63796
0.755929
0.117185
0.123159
0.454371
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.866025
0.755929
0.866025 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.333333
0.454371
0.333333 n/a n/a n/a n/a
NCEMBT-080201 389
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q87. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 3.
Variable
SndMechHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.07125 p value
0.808756
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.05882
-0.08692
-0.05507
0.263547
0.841677
0.824045
0.888102
0.493219
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.188982
-0.03432
0.186339
-0.03432
0.186339
0.626283
0.956306
0.764126
0.956306
0.764126
Table Q88. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMechHear
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.420737
0.408156
0.214155
0.37195
-0.25028
0.092623
0.103857
0.552437
0.289887
0.485540
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.17484
-0.45579
-0.51952
-0.13694
-0.06373
0.629012
0.256372
0.186977
0.746427
0.880836
Table Q89. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMechHear
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.08242
0.141895
0.5
0.5
0.722461
0.539516
0.666667
0.666667
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.5
-0.5
1
1
-1
-1
0.666667
0.666667
390 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q90. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 6.
Variable
SndMechHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.07441 p value
0.623112
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.2853
-0.08453
-0.24456
0.062249
0.054622
0.694534
0.249424
0.772615
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.031035
-0.47319
-0.29736
-0.17292
-0.08886
0.885536
0.087462
0.301849
0.554405
0.762584
Table Q91. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMechHear
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.26055
0.232596
0.124122
0.034143
0.199669
0.009196
0.020516
0.411159
0.821774
0.178432
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.111256
-0.11714
-0.18956
0.2476
0.165579
0.456566
0.603666
0.398169
0.266582
0.461484
Table Q92. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMechHear
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.19222
-0.20602
0.057599
0
0.228590
0.196266
0.892241
1
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.15785
-0.42524
0.927019
1
0.890361
0.5
0.708913
0.293576
0.244724
0
0.300904
0.666667
NCEMBT-080201 391
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q93. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 9.
Variable
SndMechHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.33454 p value
0.009604
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.40015
0.298698
0.410143
0.244244
0.001688
0.176918
0.057983
0.273328
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.269326
-0.24768
-0.42429
-0.16746
-0.24445
0.225487
0.393243
0.130525
0.567163
0.399639
Table Q94. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Building
Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area” for Building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndMechHear
SndMechHear
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechAnnoy
SndMechProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.16175
0.178565
0.029202
-0.07268
0.082061
0.165621
0.125326
0.859922
0.660156
0.619447
SndMechProdAffect
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrWithin
SndMechDistrFor
SndMechDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.06468
-0.04984
0.025555
0.385494
0.282503
0.695669
0.808927
0.901380
0.051788
0.162017
392 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q23.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS IN
C
OMPARISON OF
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS AND THE
C
AUSE OF
THE M ECHANICAL E QUIPMENT S OUND D ISTRACTION
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q95. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Mechanical Equipment Sound
Distraction for “too loud.”
Bldg ID
1
1
2
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
0.160814
0.389742 n/a p value
0.703632
0.339863 n/a
5
6
4
5
3
4
2
3
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson n/a n/a n/a
0.638476
0.553614
0.046898
-0.01890
0.335497 n/a n/a n/a
0.005808
0.021136
0.840023
0.935198
0.022647
8
9
9
10
7
8
6
7
10
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.334936
0.018193
0.010156
-0.00199
-0.07362
-0.06383
0.011557
-0.07748
-0.02345
0.022889
0.858150
0.920524
0.990144
0.647341
0.630998
0.930772
0.508764
0.841725
NCEMBT-080201 393
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q96. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Mechanical Equipment Sound
Distraction for “intermittent/unpredictable.”
Bldg ID
1
Type
Pearson
Corr n/a p value n/a
2
3
1
2
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson n/a
0.654872
0.812636
0.06472 n/a
0.110406
0.026310
0.826017
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.083666
-0.28567
-0.36282
0.154991
0.188982
-0.18281
-0.19289
0.776134
0.266348
0.152338
0.502323
0.411972
0.223976
0.199019
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.04522
-0.01408 n/a n/a
0.042951
0.050496
-0.03477
-0.03384
0.656734
0.890017 n/a n/a
0.746695
0.704088
0.767108
0.773167
394 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q97. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Mechanical Equipment Sound
Distraction for “increases /decreases.”
Bldg ID Type Corr p value
2
2
1
1
3
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.186645
0.085049 n/a n/a n/a
0.658083
0.841301 n/a n/a n/a
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a
0.252997
0.25683 n/a n/a
-0.24742
-0.37225 n/a
0.382829
0.375414 n/a n/a
0.097359
0.010850
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.219895
0.190666 n/a n/a
-0.08534
-0.08261 n/a n/a
0.028744
0.058706 n/a n/a
0.520441
0.533927 n/a n/a
Table Q98. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Mechanical Equipment Sound
Distraction for “understandable.”
Bldg ID
1
1
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr n/a n/a p value n/a n/a
3
3
2
2
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
-0.02286
-0.03327 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.822302
0.743726
9
9
8
8
10
10
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.089607
0.098130 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.444556
0.402264
NCEMBT-080201 395
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q24.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS IN
C
OMPARISON OF
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS AND THE
Q
UESTION
“I H EAR S OUNDS F ROM A IR D IFFUSER /A IR S UPPLY I N M Y W ORK A REA ”
… (SndAirHear) with follow on questions concerning the sound affecting productivity
(SndAirProdAffect), if the sound was annoying/distracting (SndAirAnnoy), and how soon the annoyance/distraction occurred (SndAirDistrWithin) and for how long (SndAirDistrFor) the annoyance/distraction continued
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q99. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 1.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.48089
-0.39491
0.507754
0.227695
0.332923
0.303822
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.750366
0.225675
0.417786
-0.27735
0
-0.18898
0
0.085697
0.667234
0.409782
0.821088
1
0.878962
1
Table Q100. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 2.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.807769
0.563104
0.755929
0.027974
0.188095
0.454371
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.866025
0.5
0.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.333333
0.666667
0.666667 n/a n/a n/a n/a
396 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q101. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 3.
Variable
SndAirHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.30211 p value
0.293823
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.007293
-0.26265
-0.1824
-0.13443
0.980259
0.409510
0.570446
0.677014
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.137335
0.210042
0
0.722222
0.740436
0.670384
0.734546
1
0.168229
0.152413
Table Q102. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.227246
0.17218
0.374578
0.286203
0.227141
0.380406
0.508737
0.186990
0.321203
0.434839
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.256022
-0.62514
-0.68885
-0.06026
-0.10784
0.376971
0.133299
0.086971
0.897891
0.817983
Table Q103. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.15536
0.001192
-0.58265
-0.72457
0.501286
0.995908
0.169827
0.065494
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.1913
-0.3118
-1
-1
-1
-1
0.681152
0.496016
NCEMBT-080201 397
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q104. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 6.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.03939
-0.05968
-0.43789
-0.34233
-0.21964
0.794960
0.693595
0.022347
0.080485
0.270994
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.06634
-0.19375
-0.07603
0.050203
-0.02115
0.742335
0.506881
0.796156
0.864667
0.942790
Table Q105. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.060341
0.126698
-0.01155
0.010965
0.552980
0.211424
0.919527
0.923593
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.05457
-0.12944
0.244803
0.290637
0.306384
0.361194
0.635135
0.258702
0.162902
0.095411
0.078010
0.035837
Table Q106. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.095069
0.146682
-0.36332
-0.42204
0.554349
0.360117
0.272087
0.196022
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-1
-1 n/a n/a n/a n/a
0
0 n/a n/a n/a n/a
398 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q107. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 9.
Variable
SndAirHear
Type
Pearson
Corr
-0.13724 p value
0.299945
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirProdAffect
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.25039
-0.36490
-0.10430
-0.15603
0.055787
0.094962
0.644148
0.488064
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0
-0.40080
-0.43781
0.113938
0.167162
1
0.221864
0.178062
0.753971
0.644381
Table Q108. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air
Supply In My Work Area” for Building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndAirHear
SndAirHear
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirAnnoy
SndAirProdAffect
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.11287
-0.13795
0.011175
-0.03200
0.017889
0.334990
0.237907
0.926847
0.792589
0.883140
SndAirProdAffect
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrWithin
SndAirDistrFor
SndAirDistrFor
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.017696
0.077735
0.142590
0.494135
0.491961
0.884396
0.615985
0.355832
0.000652
0.000694
NCEMBT-080201 399
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q25.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS IN
C
OMPARISON OF
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS AND THE
C
AUSE OF
THE A IR D IFFUSER /A IR S UPPLY S OUND D ISTRACTION
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q109. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Air Diffuser/Air Supply Sound
Distraction for “too loud.”
Bldg ID
1
1
2
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Corr
0.136366
0.425243
0.633148 p value
0.747465
0.293576
0.126919
5
6
4
5
3
4
2
3
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.524554
-0.03768
0.216025
0.531153
0.500306
-0.03223
-0.0189
-0.32213
0.226767
0.898243
0.458234
0.028237
0.040826
0.889685
0.935198
0.029019
8
9
9
16
7
8
6
7
10
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.29261
0.097102
0.091024 n/a n/a
-0.18237
-0.20571
-0.18387
-0.14627
0.048455
0.339002
0.370235 n/a n/a
0.166824
0.118037
0.114317
0.210503
400 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q110. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Air Diffuser/Air Supply Sound
Distraction for “intermittent/unpredictable.”
Bldg ID Type Corr p value
2
2
1
1
3
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.04522
0.129914 n/a n/a
-0.09533
0.915322
0.759138 n/a n/a
0.745798
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.11007
-0.37334
-0.33892
-0.26114
-0.32127
-0.03687
-0.00338
0.707967
0.139925
0.183273
0.252867
0.155588
0.807790
0.982193
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.11075
-0.10112
-0.00248
0.103575
-0.16941
-0.25253
-0.01249
-0.00322
0.275131
0.319288
0.987715
0.519297
0.199605
0.053653
0.915297
0.978097
Table Q111. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Air Diffuser/Air Supply Sound
Distraction of “increases/decreases.”
Bldg ID
1
1
Type
Pearson
Spearman
Corr n/a n/a p value n/a n/a
3
3
2
2
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a
-0.06357
0.14676 n/a n/a
0.829062
0.616615
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.234835
0.190666 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.019298
0.058706
9
9
8
8
10
10
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.0371
0
-0.14631
-0.11785
-0.18941
-0.20582
0.817857
1
0.268831
0.374035
0.103622
0.076477
NCEMBT-080201 401
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q112. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Air Diffuser/Air Supply Sound
Distraction for “understandable.”
Bldg ID Type Corr p value
2
2
1
1
3
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson n/a n/a
0.613131
0.524554 n/a n/a n/a
0.143175
0.226767 n/a
6
6
5
5
3
4
4
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
9
9
10
10
8
8
7
7
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
402 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Q26.
S
TATISTICAL
R
ESULTS IN
C
OMPARISON OF
S
OUND
M
EASUREMENTS AND THE
Q
UESTION
O F P RIVACY
… (SndPrivLevel) with follow on questions concerning privacy to have a conversation (SndPrivConv) with follow on questions concerning postponing a conversation until later (SndPrivConvLater), leaving the are to gain privacy (SndPrivConvLeave) and having privacy to have a telephone conversation
(SndPrivTel), postponing a telephone conversation until later (SndPrivTelLater),and leaving the are to gain privacy for a telephone conversation (SndPrivTelLeave)
(Bldg ID = building identification; Type = statistical analysis performed; Corr = correlation, yellow highlight = significant [p<0.05]; green highlight = moderately significant [0.05<p<0.075]; n/a = not applicable as there were no responses to this question).
Table Q113. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 1.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.328148
0.175014
-0.16535
-0.37507
0.427464
0.678489
0.723120
0.407088
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.212542
0.233021
-0.41828
-0.12502
-0.16535
-0.37507
-0.13976
0.098039
-0.30626
0
0.647272
0.615064
0.350358
0.789409
0.723120
0.407088
0.765054
0.834362
0.504119
1
NCEMBT-080201 403
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q114. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 2.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.00176
0.115406
-0.01399
0
0.997011
0.805383
0.979019
1
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.38507
-0.39728
0.24328
0.318182
-0.01399
0
-0.31907
-0.25426
-0.13082
-0.12713
0.450944
0.435437
0.642279
0.538834
0.979019
1
0.537636
0.626833
0.804885
0.810335
Q115. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 3.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.409317
0.159729
0.428574
0.230685
0.146135
0.585443
0.143969
0.448298
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.235605
0.200928
0.092103
-0.03349
0.460148
0.306028
0.311579
0.341489
-0.10342
-0.25988
0.438401
0.510395
0.764743
0.913514
0.113604
0.309206
0.300058
0.253477
0.736718
0.391190
404 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q116. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 4.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel Pearson 0.064150 0.806764
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConvLater
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.047624
0.011410
-0.0529
0.102503
0.855973
0.969120
0.857464
0.727320
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.054717
-0.37012
-0.36545
0.011410
-0.0529
0.067788
0.059033
-0.33593
-0.32522
0.852617
0.192714
0.198821
0.969120
0.857464
0.817895
0.841119
0.240293
0.256542
Table Q117. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 5.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.13251
0.00035
0.09362
0.138858
0.566920
0.998799
0.694625
0.559322
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.044899
0.01292
-0.10646
-0.19057
0.109857
0.197884
0.041974
-0.00782
-0.10523
-0.24973
0.864138
0.960747
0.684242
0.463764
0.644756
0.402986
0.868653
0.975424
0.677727
0.317596
NCEMBT-080201 405
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q118. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 6.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel Pearson -0.26109 0.079664
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConvLater
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.21363
0.205181
0.233396
0.077587
0.154004
0.237041
0.177220
0.667803
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.01689
-0.11394
-0.1346
0.097924
0.092123
0.027167
-0.06612
-0.05786
-0.06435
0.925659
0.527807
0.455162
0.581660
0.604336
0.876889
0.705908
0.741305
0.713440
Table Q119. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 7.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.10217
-0.11596
-0.10261
-0.10782
0.314274
0.253028
0.347149
0.323106
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
0.033731
0.014141
0.036713
0.046369
-0.0674
-0.07348
0.164269
0.116561
0.066244
0.020497
0.764984
0.900291
0.744883
0.681032
0.537496
0.501335
0.140287
0.297011
0.554317
0.854970
406 NCEMBT-080201
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q120. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 8.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel Pearson -0.11745 0.464571
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConvLater
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
-0.26127
0.206942
-0.06867
-0.35037
0.098947
0.225897
0.690684
0.039069
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.33175
0.399833
0.18203
0.301929
0.05288
-0.57305
-0.48441
0.386272
0.275742
0.051546
0.017324
0.295299
0.073507
0.759379
0.000321
0.003190
0.021906
0.108863
Table Q121. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 9.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.04775
-0.08409
-0.14869
-0.16085
0.719489
0.526618
0.274081
0.236310
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.08473
-0.09749
0.152198
0.143429
-0.0843
-0.07689
-0.02002
-0.03527
0.1016
0.091456
0.542418
0.483100
0.271914
0.300819
0.536783
0.573262
0.885739
0.800142
0.464760
0.510721
NCEMBT-080201 407
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
Table Q122. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy for Building 10.
Variable Type Corr p value
SndPrivLevel Pearson 0.180573 0.121066
SndPrivLevel
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConv
SndPrivConvLater
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
0.199116
0.007445
0.012370
-0.07441
0.086781
0.951587
0.919645
0.555798
SndPrivConvLater
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivConvLeave
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTel
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLater
SndPrivTelLeave
SndPrivTelLeave
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
Pearson
Spearman
-0.06323
-0.20732
-0.18939
0.085310
0.089258
0.020859
0.015418
-0.21229
-0.22089
0.616780
0.097499
0.130790
0.485823
0.465793
0.869001
0.902976
0.089558
0.077020
Q27.
C
UMULATIVE
P
ROBABILITY
D
ATA
Metric
L_99_dBA
L_95_dBA
L_90_dBA
L_80_dBA
L_50_dBA
L_33_dBA
L_10_dBA
L_5_dBA
L_99_dBC
L_95_dBC
L_90_dBC
L_80_dBC
L_50_dBC
L_33_dBC
L_10_dBC
L_5_dBC
L_99_dBC_dBA
L_95_dBC_dBA
L_90_dBC_dBA
L_80_dBC_dBA
Sound level data were compiled in the commonly used metrics listed in Section 3. Cumulative probability levels of that data, without the descriptors, were created so that manageable data tables were available for the correlation analysis.
Table Q123. Cumulative probability sound level by building
Building ID
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
62.4 60.1 54.0 62.1 57.0 61.0 62.5 58.7 61.0 58.2
57.7 56.0 49.3 55.7 52.0 53.5 54.8 53.7 57.1 54.2
54.0 54.0 48.1 53.0 48.9 50.3 52.7 51.3 54.9 52.6
49.8 51.0 47.1 49.9 45.7 47.6 51.2 48.4 53.1 51.3
47.7 48.5 44.8 45.7 40.4 45.1 47.5 42.9 50.8 48.8
46.5 45.6 42.9 44.2 38.2 44.1 46.3 40.1 49.7 47.3
45.0 43.9 40.9 40.8 35.5 42.6 44.2 36.9 48.3 44.9
44.3 43.4 40.5 39.7 34.5 42.2 43.2 34.3 47.8 43.7
69.2 70.3 69.2 68.5 67.9 67.4 72.1 69.9 68.3 68.4
68.0 69.2 68.8 66.7 64.5 65.3 69.9 67.7 66.0 67.5
67.5 68.4 68.5 66.0 63.7 64.7 68.4 66.8 65.2 66.9
66.5 67.0 68.2 65.0 62.9 62.3 67.0 64.9 64.1 66.1
64.7 65.6 65.3 62.8 61.2 58.8 63.8 57.7 61.8 61.3
64.2 64.9 61.4 61.9 60.1 57.6 63.3 55.9 60.9 59.3
62.8 63.1 59.0 60.3 57.1 56.0 62.3 51.3 59.0 56.5
62.0 62.6 58.6 59.6 55.8 55.4 62.0 40.4 58.3 55.5
20.7 22.8 24.5 23.6 29.5 22.5 22.3 29.7 16.0 20.5
19.8 21.7 23.9 22.0 27.7 20.4 21.3 27.4 14.1 18.4
19.2 21.0 23.4 21.3 26.1 18.7 20.6 25.7 13.4 17.3
18.6 20.1 22.7 20.1 24.4 16.7 19.6 22.7 12.5 16.1
408 NCEMBT-080201
L_50_dBC_dBA
L_33_dBC_dBA
L_10_dBC_dBA
L_5_dBC_dBA
L_99_NCMax
L_95_NCMax
L_90_NCMax
L_80_NCMax
L_50_NCMax
L_33_NCMax
L_10_NCMax
L_5_NCMax
L_99_RC
L_95_RC
L_90_RC
L_80_RC
L_50_RC
L_33_RC
L_10_RC
L_5_RC
L_99_SIL
L_95_SIL
L_90_SIL
L_80_SIL
L_50_SIL
L_33_SIL
L_10_SIL
L_5_SIL
APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
16.9 17.6 19.5 17.1 20.1 13.3 16.8 13.7 11.0 12.9
16.3 16.3 18.3 15.3 16.8 12.2 15.2 10.0 10.1 11.2
12.5 12.7 15.4 10.6 12.1 9.0 11.8 3.7 7.4 8.1
9.6 10.3 13.6 8.5 10.0 7.0 10.4 3.5 6.0 6.6
59.0 56.9 50.2 59.1 53.3 58.2 58.4 55.0 57.7 54.2
53.6 51.8 45.5 52.0 48.2 49.5 50.7 49.5 52.9 49.8
49.6 49.7 44.6 49.0 44.4 45.9 48.4 46.8 50.6 48.2
46.3 46.5 43.6 46.0 40.5 44.3 46.8 43.3 48.6 46.8
44.6 43.3 39.8 40.0 34.6 40.3 42.0 37.0 46.6 43.4
41.8 40.8 36.9 38.4 31.5 38.9 40.4 33.4 44.7 41.6
39.8 38.9 34.7 34.3 27.8 36.0 37.7 29.9 43.7 39.0
39.4 38.3 33.8 33.0 26.5 35.6 36.4 27.2 43.3 37.6
57.4 54.4 47.8 56.7 51.4 54.8 56.9 53.3 55.6 52.8
52.6 50.4 42.6 50.0 46.4 47.6 49.3 48.4 51.7 49.0
48.2 48.3 40.8 47.3 43.2 44.3 47.2 45.9 49.4 47.5
42.4 45.0 39.1 44.3 39.8 41.1 45.7 42.9 47.2 46.1
39.1 42.1 36.6 39.6 34.4 37.3 40.5 36.9 44.3 43.5
38.0 37.7 35.3 37.8 31.7 36.2 39.2 33.6 43.0 42.0
34.2 34.5 31.6 33.1 27.4 34.8 36.3 29.5 41.1 39.4
33.1 33.8 29.3 31.7 25.8 33.9 35.4 27.2 40.4 38.0
55.2 52.5 45.7 54.3 49.8 52.8 55.6 51.3 53.3 50.7
50.3 48.4 40.1 47.7 44.5 45.2 46.7 46.5 49.3 47.0
46.1 46.1 38.3 45.0 41.4 41.9 44.8 44.1 47.1 45.6
40.2 42.8 36.6 42.1 38.1 38.8 43.4 41.3 44.9 44.2
36.7 39.7 34.0 37.3 32.5 34.9 38.5 35.5 41.6 41.7
35.5 35.3 32.8 35.3 29.9 33.9 37.1 32.1 40.2 40.2
31.5 32.2 29.3 30.6 25.9 32.1 34.3 28.0 38.0 37.6
30.3 31.5 27.1 29.0 24.2 31.2 33.3 25.7 37.2 36.3
NCEMBT-080201 409
advertisement
Related manuals
advertisement
Table of contents
- 37 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- 40 1. LITERATURE REVIEW
- 41 1.1 Thermal Comfort/Indoor Environmental Quality
- 42 1.2 Airborne And Surface-Associated Mold
- 46 1.3 Sound
- 49 1.4 Lighting
- 52 2. THERMAL COMFORT ASSESSMENT & HYPOTHESES
- 52 2.1 Thermal Comfort/IEQ
- 52 IEQ Hypothesis # 1: ≥80% of occupants in a building will be thermally comfortable if: temperatures are 27°C ≥ To ≥ 24°C (summer) and 24.5°C ≥ To ≥ 20°C (winter) and 0.012 kg ≥ W ≥ 0.0032kg of water/kg of dry air.
- 53 IEQ Hypothesis #2: There is a significant difference in thermal perception by occupants of mornings versus afternoons.
- 53 IEQ Hypothesis #3: ≤10% of occupants will make adjustments to their work area to make it more thermally comfortable.
- 53 IEQ Hypothesis #4: If the occupants' work areas are thermally unacceptable, the occupants in that area will work less efficiently (i.e., less productively).
- 53 IEQ Hypothesis #5: The occupants of a building will be thermally comfortable if the vertical temperature gradient is ≤3.0 °C.
- 53 IEQ Hypothesis #6: <15% of building occupants should feel a draft anywhere if the draft rate/percent feeling draft is ≤15%. If the draft rate is ≥15%, ≥80% of occupants in a building should feel comfortable.
- 53 IEQ Hypothesis #7: ≤20% of occupants will make adjustments to their environment to reduce the presence of a draft in their work environment.
- 53 IEQ Hypothesis #8: Eighty percent or more of the occupants in a work area will not feel stuffy if the indoor to outdoor differential concentration of CO2 is not greater than about 700 ppm.
- 54 IEQ Hypothesis#9: Occupants who perceive the air in their work area as stuffy or stagnant will make adjustments to make their work area more comfortable.
- 54 IEQ Hypothesis#10: If the occupants feel the air in their work place as stuffy or stagnant, or smell unpleasant odors, they will likely work less efficiently.
- 54 IEQ Hypothesis#11: If occupants smell unpleasant odors in their work area, some of them will be uncomfortable and make adjustments to reduce the concentration of odor.
- 54 2.2 Airborne And Surface-Associated Mold
- 54 Mold Hypothesis#1: In outdoor air, a mixed population of airborne fungus is expected with no one genus except Cladosporium predominating and the distribution of which will vary by geographic region.
- 54 Mold Hypothesis#2: Among non-problem buildings, a mixed population of airborne fungus is expected with no one genus except Cladosporium predominating and the distribution of which will vary by geographic region.
- 54 Mold Hypothesis#3: The concentration of airborne fungal genera present in non-problem buildings should reflect the outdoor fungal population in that region.
- 55 Mold Hypothesis#4: The ranges of concentration of airborne total spores observed with non- culturable air sampling and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of culturable fungal particles isolated with culturable air sampling in non-problem buildings are expected to be similar (<1 order of magnitude, <10X difference) at different sampling locations in the building.
- 55 Mold Hypothesis#5: The ranges of concentration of airborne total spores observed with non- culturable air sampling and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of culturable fungal particles isolated with culturable air sampling in non-problem buildings are expected to be similar (<1 order of magnitude, <10X difference) on different days of sampling.
- 55 Mold Hypothesis#6: Between non-problem buildings, both types of air samples are expected to show the same genera of fungi, with <1 order of magnitude difference in concentration and absence of atypical fungi.
- 55 Mold Hypothesis#7: Among non-problem buildings, a mixed population of fungi in the surface dust is expected with no one genus except Cladosporium predominating and the distribution of which will vary by geographic region.
- 55 Mold Hypothesis#8: The concentrations of surface-associated fungal genera present in non-problem buildings are consistent among buildings.
- 56 Mold Hypothesis#9: The concentration of culturable fungi in non-problem buildings is expected to be ≤105 CFU/gram of dust.
- 56 Mold Hypothesis#10: The range of concentration of surface-associated culturable fungi in dust samples collected in non-problem buildings is expected to be similar (<1 order of magnitude, <10X difference) at different sampling locations in the building.
- 56 Mold Hypothesis#11: Within the same building at different times of day in the same location, the same genera of fungi are expected to be measured in dust samples, with up to a 1 order of magnitude difference in concentration.
- 56 Mold Hypothesis#12: Regional differences between non-problem buildings are reflected in the different surface dust composition of fungal genera.
- 56 Mold Hypothesis#13: “Indicator” fungi (i.e., indicators of water intrusion/moisture accumulation of building materials capable of promoting mold growth) are expected to be “not present” in air samples in non-problem buildings.
- 56 Mold Hypothesis#14: “Indicator” fungi (i.e., indicators of water intrusion/moisture accumulation of building materials capable of promoting mold growth) are expected to be “not present” in surface dust samples in non-problem buildings.
- 57 2.3 Sound
- 57 Sound Hypothesis# 1: Sound in a work area can annoy or distract occupants.
- 57 Sound Hypothesis#2: There is variation in an occupant’s preferences and tolerances to sounds or noise in the work area.
- 57 Sound Hypothesis#3: Sound in a work area can fluctuate during the day.
- 57 Sound Hypothesis#4: Intruding sound in a work area can come from one or more of the following sound sources: (1) sound from outside the building, (2) conversations in adjacent areas, (3) telephone/speakerphones conversations, (4) building masking system, piped-in music, paging system, (5) nearby office equipment, (6) HVAC mechanical equipment, and (7) ceiling, wall, and/or floor air-supply or return air diffusers.
- 58 Sound Hypothesis#5: Sound in the work area that comes from outside the building can annoy or distract occupants.
- 58 Sound Hypothesis#6: Annoyance or distraction from outside sound can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature (on-off cycle) of the sound, time variations in the sound intensity, or irritating or harsh tones contained in the sound.
- 58 Sound Hypothesis#7: Sound in a work area from telephone speakerphone conversations in adjacent work can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 58 Sound Hypothesis#8: Annoyance or distraction from sound from telephone conversations and speakerphones in adjacent work areas can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, the intelligibility or content of the sound, or the irritating or harsh content in the sound.
- 59 Sound Hypothesis#9: Sound in a work area from conversations in adjacent work areas can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 59 Sound Hypothesis#10: Annoyance or distraction from sound from conversations in adjacent work areas can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, the intelligibility or content of the sound or the irritating or harsh content in the sound.
- 60 Sound Hypothesis#11: Sound in a work area from building piped-in music, and background-masking system can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 60 Sound Hypothesis#12: Annoyance or distraction from sound from a building masking or piped-in music system in adjacent work areas can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, fluctuations in the sound intensity or the irritating or harsh content in the sound.
- 60 Sound Hypothesis#13: Sound in a work area from nearby office equipment (copy machines, typewriters, etc.) can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 60 Sound Hypothesis#14: Annoyance or distraction from nearby office equipment (copy machines, typewriters, etc.) can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, fluctuations in the sound intensity or the irritating or harsh tones contained in the sound.
- 61 Sound Hypothesis#15: Sound in a work area from ceiling or floor air-supply diffusers can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 61 Sound Hypothesis#16: Annoyance or distraction from air-supply or return-air diffusers can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, fluctuations in the sound intensity or the irritating or harsh tones contained in the sound.
- 61 Sound Hypothesis#17: Annoying or distracting sound from ceiling or floor air-supply diffusers can come from various room boundaries.
- 61 Sound Hypothesis#18: Annoying or distracting sound from ceiling or floor air-supply diffusers can have predominant distinguishing characteristics.
- 62 Sound Hypothesis#19: Annoying or distracting sound from ceiling or floor air-supply diffusers can originate from mechanical equipment.
- 62 Sound Hypothesis#20: Annoying or distracting sound from ceiling or floor air-supply diffusers can originate from conversations elsewhere in the building.
- 62 Sound Hypothesis#21: Sound in a work area from mechanical equipment within a building can annoy or distract occupants.
- 62 Sound Hypothesis#22: Annoyance or distraction from mechanical equipment within the building can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, fluctuations in the sound intensity or the irritating or harsh tones contained in the sound.
- 63 Sound Hypothesis#23: Annoying or distracting sound from mechanical equipment within a building can come from various room boundaries.
- 63 Sound Hypothesis#24: Annoying or distracting sound from mechanical equipment within a building can have predominant distinguishing characteristics.
- 63 Sound Hypothesis#25: Conditions that allow building occupants to clearly hear talking in person or by telephone or speakerphone can cause workers to believe that they cannot have a private conversation in their work area.
- 63 Sound Hypothesis#26: Building occupants take positive action to mitigate a distracting or annoying noise.
- 63 Sound Hypothesis#27: If building occupants believe they cannot have a private conversation in their work area, they will move to a more private area for confidential conversations.
- 63 Sound Hypothesis#28: If building occupants believe they cannot have a private conversation in their work area, they will postpone confidential conversations to a time when people are not present in adjacent areas.
- 64 2.4 Lighting
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#1: Most people will be comfortable when the lighting in their work areas is neither too bright nor too dim.
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#2: The lighting over 700 Lux on the work surface will be considered as “very bright” or “somewhat bright” and lower than 300 Lux may be considered as “very dim or dark” or “somewhat dim or dark”.
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#3: Lower than 50 Lux of the lighting at computer screens will be considered as “very dim or dark” or somewhat dim or dark”.
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#4: The uniformity of illuminance less 3 at work surfaces will be considered as uniform.
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#5: When there is too much glare on desk surfaces or workstations, and/or on my computer screen, most occupants’ productivity will be adversely affected.
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#6: Most people prefer to have natural light from outdoors come into their office or work area.
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#7: If the CRI of lighting is 75 or greater, the color of people’s faces and objects in work area will appear natural.
- 64 IESNA Lighting Handbook
- 64 Lighting Hypothesis#8: The CCT of the lighting lower than 3000 K will be evaluated as visually warm and higher than 5000 will be evaluated as visually cool.
- 65 3. METHODS
- 65 3.1 Building
- 65 3.1.1 Building Selection Criteria
- 65 3.1.2 Building Recruitment
- 65 3.1.3 Building Selection General Questions
- 65 3.1.4 Building Characterization Questionnaire
- 65 3.1.5 Procedure to Generate MLID
- 66 3.2 Indoor EnvironmentalQuality
- 66 3.2.1 Thermal Comfort
- 66 3.2.2 CO2
- 66 3.2.3. VOCs
- 66 3.3 Airborne And Surface-Associated Mold
- 67 3.4 Sound
- 67 3.5 Lighting
- 70 4. RESULTS
- 70 4.1 Building Locations
- 70 4.1 Energy Table
- 71 4.2 Overview of Responses
- 76 4.3 Thermal Comfort/IEQ
- 76 4.3.1 IEQ Hypotheses Results
- 76 IEQ Hypothesis #1: > 80% of occupants in a building will be thermally comfortable if: 27°C ≥To ≥24°C (summer) and 24.5°C≥ To ≥20°C (winter)] and 0.012 ≥ W ≥ 0.0032 kg of water/kg of dry air.
- 77 IEQ Hypothesis #2: There is a significant difference between mornings and afternoons in thermal perception by occupants.
- 78 IEQ Hypothesis #3: ≤10% of occupants will make adjustments to their work area to make it more thermally comfortable.
- 78 IEQ Hypothesis #4: If the occupants' work areas are thermally unacceptable, the occupants in that area will work less efficiently (i.e., less productively).
- 79 IEQ Hypothesis #5: The occupants of a building will be thermally comfortable if the vertical temperature gradient is ≤3.0 °C.
- 80 IEQ Hypothesis #6: There is a significant difference between mornings and afternoons in relative humidity and related occupant comfort perception.
- 80 IEQ Hypothesis #7: ≤20% of occupants will make adjustments to their environment when they are in a too dry (AH<0.0032 Pa) or too humid environment (AH>0.012 Pa).
- 81 IEQ Hypothesis #8: <15% of building occupants should feel a draft anywhere if the draft rate is ≤15%. If the draft rate is ≤15%, ≥80% of occupants in a building should feel comfortable.
- 82 IEQ Hypothesis #9: Occupants will make adjustments to their environment to reduce the presence of a draft in their work environment.
- 83 IEQ Hypothesis #10: ≥80% of occupants in a work area (zone) will not complain of stuffy air if the indoor vs. outdoor concentration difference in CO2 ≤ 700 ppm.
- 83 IEQ Hypothesis #11: ≤20% of occupants who perceive the air is stuffy or stagnant will make adjustments to their work environment to make their work area more comfortable.
- 84 IEQ Hypothesis #12: If the occupants' work areas perceive their air as stuffy or stagnant, the occupants in that area will work less efficiently (i.e., less productively).
- 84 IEQ Hypothesis #13: If occupants smell unpleasant odors in their work area, no more than (≤) 20% will be uncomfortable and make adjustments in their environment to reduce the odor.
- 85 IEQ Hypothesis #14: ≥80% of occupants will have job satisfaction when the indoor environmental quality is acceptable.
- 85 4.3.2 IEQ Summary
- 86 4.4 Airborne And Surface-Associated Mold
- 86 4.4.1 Mold Results
- 86 4.4.2 Mold Hypotheses Results
- 86 Mold Hypothesis#1: In outdoor air, a mixed population of airborne fungus is expected with no one genus except Cladosporium predominating and the distribution of which will vary by geographic region.
- 87 Mold Hypothesis#2: Among non-problem buildings, a mixed population of airborne fungus is expected with no one genus except Cladosporium predominating and the distribution of which will vary by geographic region.
- 88 Mold Hypothesis#3: The concentration of airborne fungal genera present in non-problem buildings should reflect the outdoor fungal population in that region.
- 88 Mold Hypothesis#4: The ranges of concentration of airborne total spores observed with non- culturable air sampling and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of culturable fungal particles isolated with culturable air sampling in non-problem buildings are expected to be similar (<1 order of magnitude, <10X difference) at different sampling locations in the building.
- 89 Mold Hypothesis#5: The ranges of concentration of airborne total spores observed with non- culturable air sampling and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of culturable fungal particles isolated with culturable air sampling in non-problem buildings are expected to be similar (<1 order of magnitude, <10X difference) on different days of sampling.
- 89 Mold Hypothesis#6: Between non-problem buildings, both types of air samples are expected to show the same genera of fungi, with <1 order of magnitude difference in concentration and absence of atypical fungi.
- 90 Mold Hypothesis#7: Among non-problem buildings, a mixed population of culturable fungi in the surface dust is expected with no one genus except Cladosporium predominating and the distribution of which will vary by geographic region.
- 90 Mold Hypothesis#8: The concentrations of surface-associated fungal genera present in non-problem buildings are consistent among buildings.
- 91 Mold Hypothesis#9: The concentration of culturable fungi in non-problem buildings is expected to be ≤105 CFU/gram of dust.
- 91 Mold Hypothesis#10: The range of concentration of surface-associated culturable fungi in dust samples collected in non-problem buildings is expected to be similar (<1 order of magnitude, <10X difference) at different sampling locations in the building.
- 92 Mold Hypothesis#11: Within the same building at different times of day in the same location, the same genera of fungi are expected to be measured, with up to a 1 order of magnitude difference in concentration.
- 92 Samples were only collected at one time period. Therefore, this hypothesis was not tested in the final experimental design used in this task.
- 92 Mold Hypothesis#12: Regional differences between non-problem buildings are reflected in the different surface dust composition of fungal genera, not the distribution among them.
- 92 Due to limitations on the number of buildings (i.e., ten), there were insufficient numbers of buildings in each region. Therefore, this hypothesis was not tested in the final experimental design used in this task.
- 92 Mold Hypothesis#13: “Indicator” fungi (i.e., indicators of water intrusion/moisture accumulation of building materials capable of promoting mold growth) are expected to be “not present” in air samples in non-problem buildings.
- 93 Mold Hypothesis#14: “Indicator” fungi (i.e., indicators of water intrusion/moisture accumulation of building materials capable of promoting mold growth) are expected to be “not present” in surface dust samples in non-problem buildings.
- 93 4.4.3 Mold Summary
- 94 4.5 Sound
- 94 4.5.1 Sound Results
- 94 4.5.2 Sound Hypotheses Results
- 94 Sound Hypothesis#1: Sound in a work area can annoy or distract occupants.
- 94 Sound Hypothesis#2: Annoyance or distraction from fluctuations in sound correlates with the midrange of the probability plot of sounds levels over the course of one day using the measurements of L_80 minus L_10 for sound interference level (SIL).
- 95 Sound Hypothesis#3: Sound in the work area that comes from outside the building can annoy or distract occupants.
- 96 Sound Hypothesis#4: Annoyance or distraction from outside sound can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature (on-off cycle) of the sound, time variations in the sound intensity, or irritating or harsh tones contained in the sound.
- 96 Sound Hypothesis#5: Sound in a work area from telephone/speakerphone conversations can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 97 Sound Hypothesis#6: Annoyance or distraction from sound from telephone/speakerphone conversations in adjacent work areas can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, the intelligibility or content of the sound or the irritating or harsh content in the sound.
- 98 Sound Hypothesis#7: Sound in a work area from conversations in adjacent work areas can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 98 Sound Hypothesis#8: Annoyance or distraction from sound from conversations in adjacent work areas can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, the intelligibility or content of the sound or the irritating or harsh content in the sound.
- 99 Sound Hypothesis#9: Sound in a work area from piped-in music or background masking system can annoy or distract building occupants.
- 99 Sound Hypothesis#10: Annoyance or distraction from sound from piped in music or masking sounds can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, the intelligibility or content of the sound or the irritating or harsh content in the sound.
- 100 Sound Hypothesis#11: Sound in a work area from nearby office equipment (e.g., copy machines, typewriters) annoys or distracts building occupant.
- 100 Sound Hypothesis#12: Annoyance or distraction from the sound of office equipment (e.g., copy machines, typewriters) can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, the intelligibility or content of the sound or the irritating or harsh content in the sound.
- 101 Sound Hypothesis#13: Sound in a work area from mechanical equipment within a building annoys or distracts occupants.
- 102 Sound Hypothesis#14: Annoyance or distraction from the sound of mechanical equipment within the building can be caused by the overall sound level, fluctuations in the sound intensity or harsh tones contained in the sound.
- 102 Sound Hypothesis#15: Sound in a work area from the air conditioning system (air supply or air return) within a building annoys or distracts occupants.
- 103 Sound Hypothesis#16: Annoyance or distraction from sound from ceiling or floor air-supply diffusers can be caused by the overall sound level, the intermittent nature of the sound, fluctuations in the sound intensity or the irritating or harsh tones contained in the sound.
- 103 Sound Hypothesis#17: Conditions that allow building occupants to clearly hear other people talking, having telephone and/or speakerphone conversations can cause workers to believe that they cannot have a private conversation in their work area.
- 104 Sound Hypothesis#18: If building occupants believe they cannot have a private conversation in their work area, they will move to a more private area for confidential conversations.
- 104 Sound Hypothesis#19: If building occupants believe they cannot have a private conversation in their work area, they will postpone confidential conversations to a time when people are not present in adjacent areas.
- 105 4.5.3 Sound Summary
- 105 4.6 Lighting
- 105 4.6.1 Lighting System Results
- 106 4.6.2 Lighting Measurement Results
- 110 4.6.3 Lighting Hypotheses Results
- 110 Lighting Hypothesis#1: Most people will be comfortable when the lighting in their work areas is neither too bright nor too dim.
- 110 Lighting Hypothesis#2: The lighting over 700 Lux on the work surface will be considered as “very bright” or “somewhat bright” and lower than 300 Lux may be considered as “very dim or dark” or “somewhat dim or dark.”
- 110 Lighting Hypothesis#3: Lower than 50 Lux of the lighting at computer screens will be considered as “very dim or dark” or somewhat dim or dark”.
- 110 Lighting Hypothesis#4: The uniformity of illuminance less than 3 at work surfaces will be considered as uniform.
- 110 Lighting Hypothesis#5: When there is too much glare on desk surfaces or workstations, and/or on my computer screen, most occupants’ productivity will be adversely affected.
- 111 Lighting Hypothesis#6: Most people prefer to have natural light from outdoors come into their office or work area.
- 111 Lighting Hypothesis#7: If the CRI of lighting is 75 or greater, the color of people’s faces and objects in work area will appear natural.
- 111 Lighting Hypothesis#8: The CCT of the lighting lower than 3000 K will be evaluated as visually warm and higher than 5000 will be evaluated as visually cool.
- 112 5. CONCLUSIONS
- 112 5.1 Building Characteristics
- 112 5.2 Thermal Comfort/ Indoor Environmental Quality
- 113 5.3 Airborne And Surface-Associated Mold
- 113 5.4 Sound
- 115 5.5 Lighting
- 116 5.6 Lessons Learned
- 118 6. REFERENCES
- 129 APPENDIX A: QUESTIONNAIRES REVIEWED
- 132 A1. Indoor Background Survey Questions Associated with the ASHRAE Survey
- 134 Personal Comfort
- 135 Personal Control
- 138 Health Characteristics
- 141 A2. Spagnolo and de Dear, 1988 Questionnaire.
- 142 A3. Nakano, et al., 2002 Questionnaire
- 143 A4. Center for the Built Environment Survey
- 144 APPENDIX B: BUILDING SELECTION CRITERIA
- 147 APPENDIX C: BUILDING SELECTION QUESTIONNAIRE
- 149 APPENDIX D: BUILDING CHARACTERIZATION QUESTIONNAIRE
- 156 APPENDIX E: THERMAL COMFORT SENSORS
- 156 E1. Description of Sensors
- 158 E2. Standard operating procedure for VIVO IEQ instruments (Prepared in part with information from the VIVO instruction manual)
- 158 E2.1 Set-up of VIVO Instruments
- 159 VIVO Temperature
- 159 VIVO Humidity
- 159 VIVO Draught
- 159 VIVO Field Control
- 164 E2.2 Recommended Installation Of Testing Station
- 165 E2.3 Collecting VIVO Data Using Laptop
- 167 E2.4 Output From Sensors (Both Measured And Calculated)
- 169 E2.5 Assembly Of Super Battery And Stand
- 170 E3. Types Of Raw Variables Measured For Thermal Comfort
- 174 E4. Calculated Indices For Thermal Comfort
- 178 APPENDIX F: CO2 SENSORS
- 178 F1. Description of Sensors
- 179 F2. Standard Operating Procedures for the use of the bacharach
- 180 F3. Standard Operating Procedure for the use of HOBOS
- 181 F4. Standard Operating Procedure for the use of IAQRAE
- 182 Calibration of the IAQRAE
- 184 APPENDIX G: VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS MEASUREMENTS
- 184 G1. Description of Sensor
- 184 G2. Standard Operating Procedure
- 184 G2.1 To Launch IAQRAE
- 185 G2.2 To Save Data
- 186 APPENDIX H: AIRBORNE AND SURFACE-ASSOCIATED MOLD PROTOCOLS
- 187 H1. General Description of Sampling Logistics
- 187 H2. Culturable Air Sampling Protocol
- 187 H3. Non-Culturable Air Sampling Protocol
- 187 H4. Vacuum Sampling Protocol
- 188 APPENDIX I: SOUND PROTOCOLS
- 189 I1. Instrument Selection And Description
- 190 I2. Field-Testing Procedures
- 191 I3. Sound Related Portion Of The Data Reduction And Analysis
- 194 I4. Standard Operating Procedure For Sound Measurement Instruments
- 194 I4.1 Safety Instructions
- 195 I4.2 Equipment List
- 195 I4.3 Pre-departure Checks
- 196 I4.4 Packing/Shipping Procedure
- 196 I4.5 On Site Setup
- 196 I4.6 Sound Meter Automatic Recording Setup
- 200 I4.7 Equipment Setup
- 200 I4.8 Office Sound Data Recording
- 201 I4.9 Packing/Shipping Procedure For Return To UNLV Or Next Building.
- 202 I5. Calculation Algorithms
- 202 I5.1 dBA Bumps
- 202 I5.2 NC – Noise Criteria
- 204 I5.3 NCB – Balanced Noise Criteria - Rumble
- 205 I5.4 NCB – Balanced Noise Criteria - Hiss
- 206 I5.5 RC – Room Criteria
- 209 I6. Summary of Calculated Values
- 209 I6.1 dBA Bumps
- 210 I6.2 NC – Noise Criteria
- 210 I6.3 NCB – Balanced Noise Criteria
- 210 I6.4 RC – Room Criteria
- 210 I6.5 RC Mark II (RCII) Alternate Room criteria
- 210 I6.6 CPL - Cumulative Probability Levels
- 211 APPENDIX J: LIGHTING PROTOCOLS
- 212 J1. Description of Instruments
- 212 J1.1 Illuminance Meter T-10
- 213 Names and Functions of Parts
- 213 Basic Operation
- 214 J1.2 Luminance Meter LS-100
- 215 Names and Functions of Parts
- 215 Basic Operation
- 216 J1.3 Chroma Meter CS-100A
- 217 J1.4 Spectroradiometer
- 218 Names and Functions of Parts
- 218 Basic Operation
- 218 Taking a measurement
- 219 Save a measurement
- 219 J2. Illuminance Measurements
- 220 J3. Luminance Measurements
- 221 J4. Lighting Data Entry Procedure
- 223 APPENDIX K: LIGHTING FIELD SURVEY TABLE
- 224 K1.Room Descriptions
- 224 K2. Lighting Control System Types
- 225 K3. Luminary Information
- 225 K3.1 Ambient Light 1
- 225 K3.2 Ambient Light 2
- 226 K3.3 Ambient Light 3
- 226 K3.4 Task Light 1
- 227 K3.5 Task Light 2
- 227 K3.6 Task Light 3
- 228 K4. Light Power Density
- 228 K5. Measurements of Workstations
- 228 K5.1 General Information
- 228 K5.2 Illuminance Measurements
- 229 K5.3 Luminance Measurements
- 229 K5.4 Color Measurements
- 229 K5.4.1 Color of the lighting at work surface
- 229 K5.4.2 Color of the lighting at other places
- 230 APPENDIX L- ENERGY USAGE
- 231 APPENDIX M: IEQ RESULTS
- 275 APPENDIX N: AIRBORNE AND SURFACE-ASSOCIATED MOLD RESULTS
- 315 APPENDIX O: STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR MOLD
- 316 O2. Variance Component Analysis Of Airborne Fungi
- 317 O3. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Indoor And Outdoor Airborne Fungi
- 319 O4. Ratios Among The Six Indoor Locations (Zones)
- 321 O5. Statistical Results Indoor Vs. Outdoor
- 323 O6. Water Indicating Fungi
- 324 O7. Error Plots Demonstrating Variability Among Days And Locations
- 329 APPENDIX P – SOUND RESULTS
- 379 APPENDIX Q- SOUND LEVEL DATA
- 380 Q1. dBA Bumps
- 380 Q2. dBC
- 380 Q3. dBC - dBA
- 380 Q4. NC – Noise Criteria
- 380 Q5. NCB – Balanced Noise Criteria
- 381 Q6. RC – Room Criteria
- 381 Q7. RC Mark II (RCII) Alternate Room criteria
- 381 Q8. Cumulative Probability Levels (CPL)
- 382 Q9. Covariance In Sound Measurements Using Analysis Of Covariance (Ancova)
- 385 Q10. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements With Answers To The Occupant Perception Questionnaire For The Question “Over The Last Four Weeks I Would Rate The Sound Or Noise In My Work Area As Acceptable”
- 389 Q11. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements In With Answers To The Occupant Perception Questionnaire For The Question “Throughout The Course Of The Entire Workday, The Sounds Or Noise In My Work Area Fluctuates”
- 390 Q12. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements With Answers To The Occupant Perception Questionnaire For The Question “I Hear Sounds From Outside The Building (Airplanes, Traffic, Trains, Construction, Mechanical Equipment, Sirens, Etc.) In My Work Area”
- 394 Q13. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Cause Of The Sound Distraction
- 397 Q14. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements With Answers To The Occupant Perception Questionnaire For The Question “I Hear Sounds From Telephone/Speaker Phone Conversations That Carry Into My Work Area”
- 401 Q15. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Cause Of The Telephone/Speakerphone Distraction
- 404 Q16. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Conversations That Carry Into My Work Area”
- 408 Q17. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Cause Of Conversation Distraction
- 411 Q18. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Piped In Music Or Masking Sounds In My Work Area”
- 415 Q19. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Cause Of The Piped In Music Or Masking Sound Distraction
- 418 Q20. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Office Equipment In My Work Area”
- 422 Q21. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Cause Of The Office Equipment Sound Distraction
- 425 Q22. Statistical Results In Comparison Of Sound Measurements And The Question “I Hear Sounds From Building Mechanical Equipment In My Work Area”
- 429 Q23. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Mechanical Equipment Sound Distraction
- 432 Q24. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question “I Hear Sounds From Air Diffuser/Air Supply In My Work Area”
- 436 Q25. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Cause of the Air Diffuser/Air Supply Sound Distraction
- 439 Q26. Statistical Results in Comparison of Sound Measurements and the Question Of Privacy
- 444 Q27. Cumulative Probability Data
- 446 APPENDIX R- DESCRIPTION OF LIGHTING SYSTEMS
- 447 APPENDIX S- LIGHTING RESULTS
- 453 APPENDIX T: BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS DATA
- 461 APPENDIX U: OCCUPANT PERCEPTION QUESTIONNAIRE.